ARROW

ARROW Price Prediction 2026

ARROW
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 9, 2026

G6cHLEwYHyZJXBhKpSWMU6RUtcq9HM9UTn2cTEdKpump

$0.041518

+1.07%

FDV $15,177

LiveContract:G6cHLEwYHyZJXBhKpSWMU6RUtcq9HM9UTn2cTEdKpumpChain:SolanaHolders:1,467Market cap:$15,177

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about ARROW

Report snapshotas of Jul 9, 05:17 AM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$33,993

Holders

216

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

ARROW (G6cHLEwYHyZJXBhKpSWMU6RUtcq9HM9UTn2cTEdKpump) is a PumpFun-launched Solana token currently priced at ~$0.000206, with a fully diluted valuation of ~$203K and only $34K in liquidity. The token has experienced a 102% 24h price surge, but this is accompanied by severe red flags: 70.3% sell pressure, deeply contradictory holder data (current holders reported as 216 vs. 30-day historical flat at 867 with a -651 drop in 24h/7d/30d simultaneously), zero top-holder data, zero supply concentration data, and a mutable contract with unknown update authority. The data profile is highly anomalous and suggests either a data indexing failure, token manipulation, or a very high-risk micro-cap with extremely thin liquidity.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme price volatility: +102% in 24h on very thin $34K liquidity
Deeply contradictory holder metrics: current count of 216 vs. 30-day historical flat at 867, with -651 reported across 24h/7d/30d simultaneously
Sell pressure dominates at 70.3% of 24h volume ($112.55K sells vs. $47.53K buys)
Total supply reported as 1 (integer, 0 decimals) — highly unusual tokenomics
No top holder data, no supply concentration data, and no sniper data available — severely limits analysis confidence
Mutable contract with unknown update authority — elevated rug risk

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The 5-minute price change of -14.97% and dominant sell pressure (70.3% of 24h volume) suggest the recent 102% pump is likely a short-lived spike on thin liquidity. With only $34K in total liquidity, even modest sell orders can cause severe drawdowns. The OHLC data shows extreme intracandle volatility with wicks suggesting failed breakouts.

Target low$0.000040
Target high$0.000210
Support: $0.000040 (candle [1] and [3] open/low), $0.000102 (candle [2] low)
Resistance: $0.000107 (candle [3] high), $0.000187 (candle [1] low — data anomaly, likely actual high)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

The 30-day holder history shows zero organic growth (flat at 867 for the entire period), and the current holder count has collapsed to 216. There is no evidence of community building, utility adoption, or sustained buying interest. Without a catalyst or fundamental development, the medium-term outlook is bearish.

Catalysts
  • Any verifiable product launch or launchpad utility demonstration
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting micro-caps
  • Whale accumulation (currently undetectable due to missing top-holder data)

Bullish factors

  • 102% 24h price gain demonstrates speculative momentum exists
  • 1,376 buy transactions in 24h shows some active buyer participation
  • 973 unique buyers in 24h indicates broader-than-expected interest for a 216-holder token

Bearish factors

  • 70.3% sell pressure ($112.55K sells vs. $47.53K buys) in 24h
  • Only $33.99K total liquidity — extreme slippage risk
  • Holder count collapsed from 867 (historical) to 216 (current) — massive holder exodus
  • 30-day holder history completely flat at 867 with zero organic growth
  • No top-holder data available — cannot assess concentration or whale behavior
  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — rug risk unquantifiable
  • 5-minute price already down -14.97% from recent peak
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is a highly anomalous tokenomics structure
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to severely incomplete data: no top-holder information, no supply concentration metrics, contradictory holder counts, unknown update authority, and only 3 OHLC candles available. The anomalous data profile makes reliable price modeling impossible.

ARROW call history

Full track record →
Jul 9bearish
24h+16.6%
7d-78.8%
30d-93.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available (2026-07-09 03:00–05:00 UTC). The OHLC data contains anomalies: in candle [1] (05:00), the Low ($0.000187) is higher than the High ($0.000104), which is physically impossible and suggests a data feed error or inverted field labeling. Treating the higher value as the actual high: Candle [3] (03:00) opened at $0.0000401, spiked to $0.000107, and closed at $0.000102 — a strong bullish candle. Candle [2] (04:00) opened at $0.000104, barely moved, then closed back at $0.0000401 — a bearish engulfing/collapse candle with volume of $103,991 (the highest of the three). Candle [1] (05:00) shows another attempted recovery. The pattern suggests a pump-and-dump cycle within a 3-hour window.

Trend

Short-term
sideways
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 30%Sell 70%

Short-term price action is extremely volatile and directionless within a narrow micro-cap range. The medium-term trend is bearish given the collapse in holder count and flat 30-day holder history with no organic growth.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000040 (repeated open/low across candles [1] and [3])
Major$0.000040 (only identifiable floor in available data)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000107 (candle [3] high)
Major$0.000187 (candle [1] anomalous high — if valid, represents the 3-candle peak)

The $0.000040 level acts as a base that price has returned to multiple times within the 3-hour window, making it the key support. Resistance clusters around $0.000104–$0.000107 based on candle highs. The current price of $0.000206 is significantly above all candle data, suggesting the price moved sharply after the last available candle — this gap between OHLC data and current price is itself a red flag.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish engulfing: Candle [2] opened at the prior close high and collapsed back to the base — high-volume distribution signal
  • Pump-and-dump cycle visible within 3-hour window: spike to $0.000107, collapse to $0.0000401, partial recovery
  • Anomalous OHLC data in candle [1] (Low > High) suggests data feed issues or manipulation
  • Current price ($0.000206) is ~2x above the highest candle value in available data — unexplained gap

Total holders216
24h Δ-651
7d Δ-651
30d Δ-651
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

Inverse and anomalous: despite a 102% price increase in 24h, holder count has collapsed by 651 (reported identically across 24h, 7d, and 30d windows). This identical figure across all timeframes is statistically impossible under normal conditions and strongly suggests a data anomaly, a token migration/relaunch event, or mass wallet consolidation. The 30-day historical series shows a perfectly flat 867 holders for the entire period with zero daily change, which is also highly abnormal for any active token.

The holder data is deeply contradictory and unreliable. The 30-day historical series shows exactly 867 holders every single day from June 9 to July 8, 2026 — zero net change across 30 consecutive days. The current reported holder count is 216, implying a sudden -651 drop. This -651 figure is reported identically for 24h, 7d, and 30d change windows, which is mathematically impossible if the drop occurred gradually. Possible explanations: (1) a token migration or relaunch that invalidated old holder accounts, (2) a data indexing failure, (3) mass wallet consolidation. The acquisition data (swap=-257, transfer=473) also shows negative swap-based acquisition, which is unusual. Investors should treat all holder metrics as unreliable for this token.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available — data source returned empty results

0.00%

No top holder data is available for this token. The supply concentration metrics report 0% for both top 10 and top 100 holders, which is impossible for any real token and confirms a data availability failure rather than actual distribution. The token has a total supply of 1 with 0 decimals, which is an extremely unusual structure — it may indicate a non-fungible or semi-fungible token design, or a data error in the supply field. Without top holder data, whale behavior, concentration risk, and distribution health cannot be properly assessed. The 'very_concentrated' classification is assigned as a conservative default given the data vacuum and the anomalous supply structure.

Liquidity$33,990
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$47,530
Sell$112,550
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers973
Unique sellers941

Liquidity is critically shallow at $33.99K against a $203K FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of approximately 16.7%, which is very low. Any trade of meaningful size will cause severe slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $112.55K in sell volume vs. $47.53K in buy volume represents a net outflow of ~$65K, or roughly 1.9x more selling than buying. Despite slightly more unique buyers (973) than sellers (941), sellers executed 2,412 transactions vs. 1,376 buy transactions — sellers are trading more aggressively and in larger average sizes. The token trades on PumpSwap (pair 2kgp6eoGqJUEvXTmMmMow45syg3mBvq9TdLXc34uJJ9M), consistent with a PumpFun-launched micro-cap. Market health is poor: thin liquidity, dominant sell pressure, and a price that is 2x above the most recent OHLC candle data without explanation.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (0 decimals)
FDV$203,120

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a total supply of 1 with 0 decimals, which is an extremely anomalous structure for a fungible token. This could indicate: (1) a data error in the supply field, (2) a non-standard token design, or (3) the token represents a single indivisible unit. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the contract is mutable — this means the token metadata can be changed by whoever holds the update authority, which is a significant rug risk vector. Neither mint authority nor freeze authority renouncement status can be confirmed from the available data. The contract is not verified and is mutable. The FDV of $203K is calculated against the anomalous supply of 1, making the FDV figure unreliable. Social links (Telegram, Twitter, website) are present, which is a minor positive signal, but the unverified, mutable contract with unknown authority is a major concern.

Volatility
high

102% 24h price gain followed by -14.97% in 5 minutes on $34K liquidity. OHLC candles show extreme intracandle swings. Price is currently 2x above the most recent candle data without explanation.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $33.99K against $203K FDV. Liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~16.7%. Any meaningful position exit will cause severe slippage and price impact.

Concentration
high

No top holder data available. Supply concentration reported as 0% for top 10 and top 100 — a data failure that prevents proper concentration assessment. The anomalous total supply of 1 with 0 decimals further obscures the true distribution picture.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, preventing direct assessment. However, the 70.3% sell pressure, 2,412 sell transactions vs. 1,376 buys, and the collapse in holder count from 867 to 216 are all consistent with early holder distribution/dumping behavior.

Authority
high

Update authority is unknown, contract is mutable and unverified. Neither mint nor freeze authority renouncement can be confirmed. This represents maximum authority risk — the token can be modified, frozen, or potentially exploited by whoever holds the unknown update authority.

Key risks

  • Unknown and unrenounced update authority on a mutable, unverified contract
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is anomalous and may indicate data errors or non-standard token design
  • Holder count collapsed from 867 to 216 — possible mass exit or token migration event
  • 30-day holder history perfectly flat at 867 with zero change — statistically impossible under normal conditions, suggests data manipulation or indexing failure
  • 70.3% sell pressure with $65K net outflow in 24h
  • Only $33.99K liquidity — extreme slippage and exit risk
  • Current price ($0.000206) is ~2x above highest OHLC candle value — unexplained price gap
  • No top holder, concentration, or sniper data available — analysis is severely data-limited

Mitigating factors

  • Social links present (Telegram, Twitter, website) — some community infrastructure exists
  • 973 unique buyers in 24h shows some genuine market interest
  • PumpSwap listing provides basic DEX liquidity access
  • Not flagged as possible spam by data provider
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford total loss. The combination of unknown authority, mutable contract, anomalous data, thin liquidity, and dominant sell pressure makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

ARROW is an extremely high-risk micro-cap PumpFun token with a $203K FDV and only $34K in liquidity. The token's data profile is riddled with anomalies: a total supply of 1 with 0 decimals, a 30-day holder history that is perfectly flat (statistically impossible), a sudden collapse in holder count from 867 to 216, no top-holder or concentration data, and an unknown mutable update authority. The 102% 24h price gain is driven by speculative momentum on thin liquidity, not fundamentals. Sell pressure dominates at 70.3%. This is a highly speculative, data-deficient token with maximum authority risk.

Bull case (low)

Speculative momentum continuation: if the ARROW launchpad concept gains traction and the team delivers a working product, early speculators could see further short-term price appreciation on thin liquidity.

  • Broader Solana memecoin/launchpad narrative momentum
  • Successful product launch or verifiable utility demonstration
  • Whale accumulation (currently undetectable)
  • Viral social media attention driving new buyer inflow

Base case

Continued decline with occasional speculative pumps: the token continues to trade as a low-liquidity micro-cap with periodic pump-and-dump cycles, gradually losing holders and liquidity until it becomes illiquid.

  • No major product development or community catalyst emerges
  • Sell pressure continues to dominate buy pressure
  • Liquidity remains thin and does not attract institutional or whale interest
  • Holder count continues to decline from current 216

Bear case (high)

Rug pull or complete collapse: the unknown update authority, mutable contract, anomalous holder data, and dominant sell pressure could culminate in a rug pull, token migration abandonment, or complete liquidity drain.

  • Unknown update authority could modify or freeze the token at any time
  • Holder count collapse from 867 to 216 suggests mass exit already underway
  • 70.3% sell pressure with $65K net outflow in 24h
  • Thin $34K liquidity means a single large sell can collapse the price
  • No verifiable product, utility, or team transparency

GeneratedJul 9, 05:17 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of analysis time. OHLC data covers 2026-07-09 03:00–05:00 UTC (3 hours). Historical holder data covers 2026-06-09 to 2026-07-08 (30 days daily). Sniper data unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics
  • Hourly OHLC price feed (3 candles)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No top holder data returned — whale map and concentration analysis are severely limited
  • Supply concentration reported as 0% for top 10 and top 100 — likely a data indexing failure
  • Holder metrics are deeply contradictory (current 216 vs. 30-day flat 867) — reliability is very low
  • No sniper data available — smart money signals cannot be assessed
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is anomalous — FDV and tokenomics analysis may be based on erroneous supply data
  • Update authority is unknown — authority risk cannot be fully quantified
  • Current price ($0.000206) is ~2x above the highest value in available OHLC candles — unexplained gap suggests data lag or missing candles
  • OHLC candle [1] contains an impossible Low > High value — data feed quality is questionable

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. All data is sourced from third-party APIs and may contain errors, delays, or inaccuracies. The token data was treated as untrusted evidence per analysis protocol — token name, description, and metadata fields may have been set by the token creator and should not be taken at face value. Investing in micro-cap Solana tokens carries extreme risk of total loss. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decision.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (0 decimals)

Key Risks

Unknown and unrenounced update authority on a mutable, unverified contract
Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is anomalous and may indicate data errors or non-standard token design
Holder count collapsed from 867 to 216 — possible mass exit or token migration event
30-day holder history perfectly flat at 867 with zero change — statistically impossible under normal conditions, suggests data manipulation or indexing failure

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be assessed from sniper activity. The broader trading data shows 2,412 sell transactions vs. 1,376 buy transactions in 24h, with 941 unique sellers vs. 973 unique buyers — suggesting that while buyer count is slightly higher, sellers are transacting more frequently, consistent with distribution behavior. The absence of sniper data, combined with the anomalous holder metrics, severely limits confidence in any smart money assessment.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results.

Unknown — no sniper or early buyer PnL data available. The 30-day flat holder history at 867 followed by a sudden collapse to 216 suggests early holders may have exited en masse.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for ARROW (ARROW)?

The 5-minute price change of -14.97% and dominant sell pressure (70.3% of 24h volume) suggest the recent 102% pump is likely a short-lived spike on thin liquidity. With only $34K in total liquidity, even modest sell orders can cause severe drawdowns. The OHLC data shows extreme intracandle volatility with wicks suggesting failed breakouts. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000040 to $0.000210.

Is ARROW a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford total loss. The combination of unknown authority, mutable contract, anomalous data, thin liquidity, and dominant sell pressure makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

How are ARROW holders trending?

ARROW currently has 216 holders and is declining (24h: -651, 7d: -651, 30d: -651). The holder data is deeply contradictory and unreliable. The 30-day historical series shows exactly 867 holders every single day from June 9 to July 8, 2026 — zero net change across 30 consecutive days. The current reported holder count is 216, implying a sudden -651 drop. This -651 figure is reported identically for 24h, 7d, and 30d change windows, which is mathematically impossible if the drop occurred gradually. Possible explanations: (1) a token migration or relaunch that invalidated old holder accounts, (2) a data indexing failure, (3) mass wallet consolidation. The acquisition data (swap=-257, transfer=473) also shows negative swap-based acquisition, which is unusual. Investors should treat all holder metrics as unreliable for this token.

What does sniper activity look like for ARROW?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding ARROW?

Unknown and unrenounced update authority on a mutable, unverified contract • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is anomalous and may indicate data errors or non-standard token design • Holder count collapsed from 867 to 216 — possible mass exit or token migration event

Track ARROW