GRAMS Price Today & AI Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available, all within the token's apparent launch window. Candle 1 (17:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000041 and spiked intra-candle to a high of $0.00022 before closing at $0.000203 — a massive expansion candle typical of initial price discovery after launch, on volume of $160.99K. Candle 2 (18:00 UTC) opened at $0.000203 and rallied hard to a high of $0.00169, closing at $0.00144 — another strong bullish expansion candle with a huge wick, on the largest volume seen ($1.47M), indicating aggressive buying followed by some profit-taking off the highs. Candle 3 (19:00 UTC, most recent) opened at $0.00144, pushed to a marginal new high of $0.001695, then sold off sharply to a low of $0.000915 before recovering to close at $0.001224 — a wide-range candle with a long upper wick and a lower close relative to candle 2's close, signaling fading momentum and profit-taking after the initial parabolic move, on reduced volume of $175.06K.

Medium-term (across the full 3-hour window) the trend remains a steep uptrend, with price up over 2,419% in 24h. However, the most recent hourly candle shows a pullback from the intra-window high of $0.001695 down to a close of $0.001224, a roughly 28% retracement from the peak — suggesting short-term momentum is stalling or reversing after the initial parabolic spike.

Key Price Levels

Immediate support sits at the candle 3 low of $0.000915; a break below could see a retest of the $0.000203 level where the initial launch consolidation occurred. Immediate resistance is the recent double-touched high near $0.001695; a clean break above this could open the path back toward the candle 1 wick high of $0.00022 which was already exceeded, making the $0.0017-0.0022 zone the next major resistance band.

Total liquidity of just $52.41K is extremely thin relative to the $1.22M fully diluted valuation and the $848.99K/$788.75K in 24h buy/sell volume — implying volume-to-liquidity turnover of roughly 31x in a single day, a hallmark of a newly launched, highly speculative pool on Raydium CPMM. Buy volume ($848.99K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($788.75K), producing a mild net inflow (51.8% buy pressure vs 48.2% sell pressure), and buyers (2,965) outnumber sellers (2,246) 24h, suggesting more net demand than supply in the short term. However, with liquidity this shallow, even moderate-sized trades can produce severe slippage and price impact in either direction, and the pool is vulnerable to a single large sell or liquidity removal event causing a sharp collapse.

Metadata fields for update authority, mint authority, freeze authority, verified contract status, and mutability are all marked 'unknown' in the provided data. This prevents any definitive assessment of rug risk stemming from token authorities. Total supply is fixed at ~1 billion tokens (999,999,999.999999) with 6 decimals, and FDV sits at ~$1.22M against only $52.41K of liquidity — a large FDV-to-liquidity gap typical of freshly launched 'stonk-fun' style tokens. Absent verification of renounced mint/freeze authorities, investors should treat this as an unverified/higher-risk contract until confirmed on-chain independently.

GRAMS is a brand-new, highly speculative token launched on StonkFun and trading on Raydium CPMM, currently in the midst of a parabolic price move (+2419.8% 24h) on very thin liquidity ($52.41K). The near-term setup shows net buying pressure (51.8% buy vs 48.2% sell) but the most recent hourly candle shows a sharp pullback from highs, and critical risk data (holder distribution, sniper activity, mint/freeze authority status) is entirely unavailable, making this an extremely high-uncertainty, high-risk speculative play rather than a fundamentals-based investment.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, incomplete on-chain data for a very newly launched, highly volatile, low-liquidity token. Significant data gaps (holder distribution, sniper activity, authority status) mean key risk factors could not be verified. Any investment decision should involve independent due diligence, and users should be prepared for the possibility of total capital loss given the risk profile identified.