inutility Price Today & AI Analysis

INUTILITYSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 16, 2026

$0.0₅5021

-11.78% 24h

Contract

Live

FkDqBb1Vz6iZH9aSD5RBV5ctPQGrF2Ye6NVJ4sXncYMF

Chain

Solana

Holders

206

Market cap

$5,020

At a $1M market cap, $INUTILITY would be $0.001000 (199x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is INUTILITY a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 28

Transfer fee

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

3%Every buy and sell · can be raised

The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about INUTILITY

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

QuamfyQuamfy$0.0₅9153-9.6%MC $9.2K

SerEl Ser de Valle de Juárez$0.0₅3560-37.1%MC $3.4K

APIAPI$0.0₅6150-10.0%MC $6.0K

SAPIJIJUThe Frog$0.000173-0.6%MC $172.5K

VerityVerity$0.0₅4241-28.5%MC $4.1K

ZECZcash$1,263.5+1.1%MC $129.40M

inutility: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-16 21:47 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$17,873.00

How concentrated is inutility ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling inutility?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is inutility liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-16 21:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $17,873.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-16 21:47 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 16, 09:47 PM UTC

FDV

$172,521

Liquidity

$17,873.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

INUTILITY (INUTILITY) is a newly-active, extremely volatile Solana meme token trading on a single shallow Raydium CPMM pool ($17.87K liquidity) against a $172.52K fully diluted valuation. Hourly candles show wild swings (low $0.0000037 to high $0.00045), with 24h price up 333% but 1h price down 49%, painting a picture of a speculative, low-liquidity token in early, chaotic price discovery. Critical transparency data — holder distribution, sniper activity, and authority renouncement status — is unavailable, which materially limits the ability to assess rug and concentration risk.

Key points

Token explicitly self-describes as 'A useless inu', signaling no utility claim beyond speculation
Trading occurs on a single Raydium CPMM pool with very thin liquidity relative to FDV
Price action shows extreme intra-day volatility uncharacteristic of established tokens
No verifiable holder, whale, or sniper data exists to corroborate distribution health

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

The most recent hourly candle shows price retreating from a high of $0.000449 to a close of $0.000173, and the 1h change is -49.2%, suggesting the token is cooling off sharply from a rapid speculative spike. Given the extremely thin liquidity, further sharp swings in either direction are likely.

Target low

$0.00006

Target high

$0.00025

Support: $0.0000965 (candle 3 low), $0.0000249 (candle 2 low)
Resistance: $0.000284 (candle 3 high), $0.000449 (candle 2 high)

Medium term · 3-14 days

neutral

Without holder and sniper transparency, medium-term trajectory is highly uncertain. Sustainability depends on whether buy pressure (currently a slight edge at 51.2%) persists and whether liquidity deepens beyond the current $17.87K pool.

Catalysts

Potential liquidity additions or removals from the pool
Continued viral/speculative attention on social media (Twitter link present)
Any change in balance between the 4,215 buys vs 3,549 sells trend

Bullish factors

24h price change is +333%, indicating strong recent speculative demand
Buy volume ($353.4K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($336.61K) over 24h
Buyer count (1,799) modestly exceeds seller count (1,617) in 24h, suggesting net new interest

Bearish factors

1h price change of -49.2% shows sharp reversal from recent highs
Extremely thin liquidity ($17.87K) makes the price prone to sharp drops on modest sell pressure
No fundamental utility described beyond meme/speculative appeal
Lack of transparency on holder concentration and authority status increases downside tail risk

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles and a single snapshot of 24h trading analytics are available; no historical trend, holder, or sniper data exists to validate directional conviction. The token's extreme volatility and shallow liquidity make any prediction inherently speculative.

INUTILITY call history

Full track record →

Sep 16bearish@ $0.000173

24h-53.8%

7d-84.3%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: FkDqBb...cYMF
Total Supply: 999,982,336.71 INUTILITY

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$17.87K) relative to FDV (~$172.52K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Violent price swings within hours (-49.2% in 1h, +333.2% in 24h) indicative of a highly speculative, likely newly-launched token
No holder distribution data available, preventing verification of whale concentration or rug risk from large holders
Mint/freeze authority status unknown, leaving open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 opened at $0.00000367 and spiked to a high of $0.0001925 before closing at $0.0000682, indicating an explosive initial pump. Candle 2 opened at $0.0000682 and spiked further to $0.000449 (the highest print in the dataset) before pulling back to close at $0.000202, showing a long upper wick / rejection pattern. Candle 3 opened at $0.000202, ranged between $0.0000966 and $0.000285, and closed at $0.000173 — a smaller-bodied candle suggesting consolidation after the parabolic move and partial retracement.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Zooming into the last few hours, price is pulling back from a parabolic spike (downtrend short-term), while the broader 24h change of +333% frames the medium-term trend as an uptrend off a very low base. This is typical of an initial pump-and-partial-retrace pattern in a newly liquid meme token.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000966 (candle 3 low)

Major support

$0.0000037 (candle 1 open/low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000284 (candle 3 high)

Major resistance

$0.000449 (candle 2 high)

Price is currently trapped between the candle 3 low ($0.0000966) as immediate support and the candle 3 high ($0.000284) as immediate resistance, following a rejection from the $0.000449 major resistance set in candle 2. A break below $0.0000966 could open a path back toward the $0.0000037-$0.0000249 lower base; a break above $0.000284 could retest the $0.000449 high.

Notable patterns

Long upper wick / shooting-star-like rejection on candle 2 after tagging $0.000449 high
Sharp parabolic spike followed by partial retracement (pump-and-fade pattern)
Decreasing volume across successive candles suggesting fading momentum

Liquidity

$17,873.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $17.87K is extremely thin relative to the $172.52K fully diluted valuation and the ~$690K combined 24h trading volume, implying the pool is likely being cycled through many times over and that any moderately sized trade could cause significant slippage. Despite the thin pool, 24h volume is fairly balanced with a slight buy-side edge (51.2% buy vs 48.8% sell, $353.40K vs $336.61K), and buyers (1,799) modestly outnumber sellers (1,617), pointing to a mild net inflow in participant terms. However, this balance can shift very quickly given the shallow liquidity base, as evidenced by the -49.2% 1h price swing.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,982,336.71 INUTILITY

FDV

$172.52K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved from a low of $0.0000037 to a high of $0.00045 within 3 hourly candles, and 1h change alone is -49.2% while 24h change is +333.2%. This is extreme volatility even by memecoin standards.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only ~$17.87K against a $172.52K FDV, meaning even modest trade sizes could move price sharply. This is a shallow single Raydium CPMM pool.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$17.87K) relative to FDV (~$172.52K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Violent price swings within hours (-49.2% in 1h, +333.2% in 24h) indicative of a highly speculative, likely newly-launched token
No holder distribution data available, preventing verification of whale concentration or rug risk from large holders
Mint/freeze authority status unknown, leaving open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
No sniper data available, so early-buyer dumping behavior cannot be assessed
Token description ('A useless inu') signals a low-utility, purely speculative/meme-driven asset with no stated fundamental value driver

Mitigating factors

24h buy/sell volumes are fairly balanced (51.2% buy vs 48.8% sell), suggesting no overwhelming one-sided dumping in aggregate 24h flow
Trading activity shows a reasonably high number of unique buyers (1,799) and sellers (1,617) in 24h, indicating some organic two-sided market participation rather than a single actor dominating

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who can tolerate total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors, retirement allocations, or anyone unable to actively monitor extremely volatile positions. Position sizing should be minimal given the combination of shallow liquidity, unknown authorities, and absent holder transparency.

INUTILITY is a highly speculative, self-described 'useless' meme token exhibiting explosive but decaying volatility, thin liquidity, and near-total absence of on-chain transparency data (holders, snipers, authorities). Any position should be treated as a high-risk speculative bet rather than an investment, sized accordingly, and monitored continuously given the token's demonstrated capacity for 49%+ hourly moves in either direction.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued viral/social momentum (leveraging its Twitter presence) drives sustained buyer interest, buy pressure remains net positive (currently 51.2% vs 48.8%), and liquidity providers deepen the pool, reducing slippage and enabling the token to hold gains from its recent +333% 24h move.

Sustained or renewed social media virality
Net positive buyer count trend (1,799 buyers vs 1,617 sellers in 24h)
Possible liquidity pool deepening attracting larger participants

Base Case

Price continues to whipsaw within a wide range bound roughly by the $0.0000037–$0.000449 range observed in the available candles, with volume gradually declining as speculative interest wanes, absent a new catalyst.

No major new liquidity injections or listings occur in the near term
Trading remains dominated by short-term speculators rather than long-term holders
No verified changes to mint/freeze authority status become available

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic spike proves to be an unsustainable pump, sell pressure overwhelms the shallow $17.87K pool, and price collapses back toward its earlier lows (as low as $0.0000037 seen in candle 1), consistent with the already-observed -49.2% 1h decline.

Extremely thin liquidity amplifying downside moves
Decreasing hourly volume signaling fading interest (370K→312K→74.7K)
No utility or fundamental value proposition beyond speculation ('A useless inu')
Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaving open supply or freeze risk
Absence of holder/whale/sniper transparency preventing risk verification

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 16, 09:47 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-16 21:47 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata
USD price snapshot
Hourly OHLC candle data (last 3 candles)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No holder distribution or holder growth data available — holderTrends and whaleMap sections are empty by necessity
No sniper wallet data available — smart money signals could not be quantified
Only 3 hourly candles provided, insufficient for robust technical pattern or trend confirmation
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, and contract verification status are all unknown
6h price change and native price/24h $ change were unavailable

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (holders, snipers, authorities). Cryptocurrency and meme-token investments carry very high risk of total loss, especially for tokens with shallow liquidity and unverified authority/holder data. Conduct independent due diligence before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is inutility (INUTILITY) a scam?

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell inutility (INUTILITY)?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 3% transfer fee, and the owner can still raise it. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is inutility ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling inutility?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is inutility liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-16 21:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $17,873.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for inutility (INUTILITY)?

Is INUTILITY a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who can tolerate total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors, retirement allocations, or anyone unable to actively monitor extremely volatile positions. Position sizing should be minimal given the combination of shallow liquidity, unknown authorities, and absent holder transparency.

What are the key risks of holding INUTILITY?

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$17.87K) relative to FDV (~$172.52K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Violent price swings within hours (-49.2% in 1h, +333.2% in 24h) indicative of a highly speculative, likely newly-launched token • No holder distribution data available, preventing verification of whale concentration or rug risk from large holders