INUTILITY

inutility Price Today & AI Analysis

INUTILITY
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Sep 16, 2026

FkDqBb1Vz6iZH9aSD5RBV5ctPQGrF2Ye6NVJ4sXncYMF

$0.000173

+333.21%

FDV $172,521

LiveContract:FkDqBb1Vz6iZH9aSD5RBV5ctPQGrF2Ye6NVJ4sXncYMFChain:SolanaHolders:572Market cap:$172,521

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about INUTILITY

Report snapshotas of Sep 16, 09:47 PM
FDV

$172,521

Liquidity

$17,873

Holders

0

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

INUTILITY (INUTILITY) is a newly-active, extremely volatile Solana meme token trading on a single shallow Raydium CPMM pool ($17.87K liquidity) against a $172.52K fully diluted valuation. Hourly candles show wild swings (low $0.0000037 to high $0.00045), with 24h price up 333% but 1h price down 49%, painting a picture of a speculative, low-liquidity token in early, chaotic price discovery. Critical transparency data — holder distribution, sniper activity, and authority renouncement status — is unavailable, which materially limits the ability to assess rug and concentration risk.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Token explicitly self-describes as 'A useless inu', signaling no utility claim beyond speculation
Trading occurs on a single Raydium CPMM pool with very thin liquidity relative to FDV
Price action shows extreme intra-day volatility uncharacteristic of established tokens
No verifiable holder, whale, or sniper data exists to corroborate distribution health

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1-24 hours

The most recent hourly candle shows price retreating from a high of $0.000449 to a close of $0.000173, and the 1h change is -49.2%, suggesting the token is cooling off sharply from a rapid speculative spike. Given the extremely thin liquidity, further sharp swings in either direction are likely.

Target low$0.00006
Target high$0.00025
Support: $0.0000965 (candle 3 low), $0.0000249 (candle 2 low)
Resistance: $0.000284 (candle 3 high), $0.000449 (candle 2 high)

Medium term

neutral
3-14 days

Without holder and sniper transparency, medium-term trajectory is highly uncertain. Sustainability depends on whether buy pressure (currently a slight edge at 51.2%) persists and whether liquidity deepens beyond the current $17.87K pool.

Catalysts
  • Potential liquidity additions or removals from the pool
  • Continued viral/speculative attention on social media (Twitter link present)
  • Any change in balance between the 4,215 buys vs 3,549 sells trend

Bullish factors

  • 24h price change is +333%, indicating strong recent speculative demand
  • Buy volume ($353.4K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($336.61K) over 24h
  • Buyer count (1,799) modestly exceeds seller count (1,617) in 24h, suggesting net new interest

Bearish factors

  • 1h price change of -49.2% shows sharp reversal from recent highs
  • Extremely thin liquidity ($17.87K) makes the price prone to sharp drops on modest sell pressure
  • No fundamental utility described beyond meme/speculative appeal
  • Lack of transparency on holder concentration and authority status increases downside tail risk
Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles and a single snapshot of 24h trading analytics are available; no historical trend, holder, or sniper data exists to validate directional conviction. The token's extreme volatility and shallow liquidity make any prediction inherently speculative.

INUTILITY call history

Full track record →
Sep 16bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 opened at $0.00000367 and spiked to a high of $0.0001925 before closing at $0.0000682, indicating an explosive initial pump. Candle 2 opened at $0.0000682 and spiked further to $0.000449 (the highest print in the dataset) before pulling back to close at $0.000202, showing a long upper wick / rejection pattern. Candle 3 opened at $0.000202, ranged between $0.0000966 and $0.000285, and closed at $0.000173 — a smaller-bodied candle suggesting consolidation after the parabolic move and partial retracement.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
uptrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 51%Sell 49%

Zooming into the last few hours, price is pulling back from a parabolic spike (downtrend short-term), while the broader 24h change of +333% frames the medium-term trend as an uptrend off a very low base. This is typical of an initial pump-and-partial-retrace pattern in a newly liquid meme token.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000966 (candle 3 low)
Major$0.0000037 (candle 1 open/low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000284 (candle 3 high)
Major$0.000449 (candle 2 high)

Price is currently trapped between the candle 3 low ($0.0000966) as immediate support and the candle 3 high ($0.000284) as immediate resistance, following a rejection from the $0.000449 major resistance set in candle 2. A break below $0.0000966 could open a path back toward the $0.0000037-$0.0000249 lower base; a break above $0.000284 could retest the $0.000449 high.

Notable patterns

  • Long upper wick / shooting-star-like rejection on candle 2 after tagging $0.000449 high
  • Sharp parabolic spike followed by partial retracement (pump-and-fade pattern)
  • Decreasing volume across successive candles suggesting fading momentum

Liquidity$17.87K
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$353.40K
Sell$336.61K
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers1,799
Unique sellers1,617

Total liquidity of just $17.87K is extremely thin relative to the $172.52K fully diluted valuation and the ~$690K combined 24h trading volume, implying the pool is likely being cycled through many times over and that any moderately sized trade could cause significant slippage. Despite the thin pool, 24h volume is fairly balanced with a slight buy-side edge (51.2% buy vs 48.8% sell, $353.40K vs $336.61K), and buyers (1,799) modestly outnumber sellers (1,617), pointing to a mild net inflow in participant terms. However, this balance can shift very quickly given the shallow liquidity base, as evidenced by the -49.2% 1h price swing.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,982,336.71 INUTILITY
FDV$172.52K

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are all listed as unknown in the available metadata, and verified contract / mutability status are also unknown. Without confirmation that mint and freeze authorities have been renounced, there remains an unquantified risk that supply could be inflated or accounts frozen. Total supply is fixed at approximately 999.98M tokens with 6 decimals, and FDV stands at $172.52K against only $17.87K of liquidity — a large gap that increases risk of price impact and makes the FDV figure a weak indicator of realizable market value.

Volatility
high

Price moved from a low of $0.0000037 to a high of $0.00045 within 3 hourly candles, and 1h change alone is -49.2% while 24h change is +333.2%. This is extreme volatility even by memecoin standards.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only ~$17.87K against a $172.52K FDV, meaning even modest trade sizes could move price sharply. This is a shallow single Raydium CPMM pool.

Concentration
high

No holder or whale distribution data is available for this token, so concentration cannot be verified. Absence of transparency here is itself a risk factor and should be treated cautiously rather than assumed benign.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available for this token, so sniper-driven dump risk cannot be quantified. Given the newly-listed, highly volatile price action, undetected early-buyer dumping remains a plausible risk even without direct evidence.

Authority
medium

Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are all listed as unknown in the metadata. Without confirmation of renouncement, the possibility of further minting or freezing cannot be ruled out.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$17.87K) relative to FDV (~$172.52K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Violent price swings within hours (-49.2% in 1h, +333.2% in 24h) indicative of a highly speculative, likely newly-launched token
  • No holder distribution data available, preventing verification of whale concentration or rug risk from large holders
  • Mint/freeze authority status unknown, leaving open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
  • No sniper data available, so early-buyer dumping behavior cannot be assessed
  • Token description ('A useless inu') signals a low-utility, purely speculative/meme-driven asset with no stated fundamental value driver

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy/sell volumes are fairly balanced (51.2% buy vs 48.8% sell), suggesting no overwhelming one-sided dumping in aggregate 24h flow
  • Trading activity shows a reasonably high number of unique buyers (1,799) and sellers (1,617) in 24h, indicating some organic two-sided market participation rather than a single actor dominating
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who can tolerate total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors, retirement allocations, or anyone unable to actively monitor extremely volatile positions. Position sizing should be minimal given the combination of shallow liquidity, unknown authorities, and absent holder transparency.

INUTILITY is a highly speculative, self-described 'useless' meme token exhibiting explosive but decaying volatility, thin liquidity, and near-total absence of on-chain transparency data (holders, snipers, authorities). Any position should be treated as a high-risk speculative bet rather than an investment, sized accordingly, and monitored continuously given the token's demonstrated capacity for 49%+ hourly moves in either direction.

Bull case (low)

Continued viral/social momentum (leveraging its Twitter presence) drives sustained buyer interest, buy pressure remains net positive (currently 51.2% vs 48.8%), and liquidity providers deepen the pool, reducing slippage and enabling the token to hold gains from its recent +333% 24h move.

  • Sustained or renewed social media virality
  • Net positive buyer count trend (1,799 buyers vs 1,617 sellers in 24h)
  • Possible liquidity pool deepening attracting larger participants

Base case

Price continues to whipsaw within a wide range bound roughly by the $0.0000037–$0.000449 range observed in the available candles, with volume gradually declining as speculative interest wanes, absent a new catalyst.

  • No major new liquidity injections or listings occur in the near term
  • Trading remains dominated by short-term speculators rather than long-term holders
  • No verified changes to mint/freeze authority status become available

Bear case (high)

The parabolic spike proves to be an unsustainable pump, sell pressure overwhelms the shallow $17.87K pool, and price collapses back toward its earlier lows (as low as $0.0000037 seen in candle 1), consistent with the already-observed -49.2% 1h decline.

  • Extremely thin liquidity amplifying downside moves
  • Decreasing hourly volume signaling fading interest (370K→312K→74.7K)
  • No utility or fundamental value proposition beyond speculation ('A useless inu')
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaving open supply or freeze risk
  • Absence of holder/whale/sniper transparency preventing risk verification

GeneratedSep 16, 09:47 PM
Data freshnessPrice and OHLC data current as of 2026-09-16T21:00:00Z; only 3 hourly candles were available, limiting historical technical context.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata
  • USD price snapshot
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (last 3 candles)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • No holder distribution or holder growth data available — holderTrends and whaleMap sections are empty by necessity
  • No sniper wallet data available — smart money signals could not be quantified
  • Only 3 hourly candles provided, insufficient for robust technical pattern or trend confirmation
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, and contract verification status are all unknown
  • 6h price change and native price/24h $ change were unavailable

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (holders, snipers, authorities). Cryptocurrency and meme-token investments carry very high risk of total loss, especially for tokens with shallow liquidity and unverified authority/holder data. Conduct independent due diligence before making any investment decision.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,982,336.71 INUTILITY

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$17.87K) relative to FDV (~$172.52K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Violent price swings within hours (-49.2% in 1h, +333.2% in 24h) indicative of a highly speculative, likely newly-launched token
No holder distribution data available, preventing verification of whale concentration or rug risk from large holders
Mint/freeze authority status unknown, leaving open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data was provided for this token, so sniper concentration, PnL state, and sell-through behavior cannot be assessed. This data gap should be treated as a limitation, not as evidence of safety.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

unknown

Unable to determine early buyer sentiment without sniper wallet data; however, aggregate 24h buyer count (1,799) modestly exceeds seller count (1,617), which offers a very indirect and weak proxy for net accumulation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for inutility (INUTILITY)?

The most recent hourly candle shows price retreating from a high of $0.000449 to a close of $0.000173, and the 1h change is -49.2%, suggesting the token is cooling off sharply from a rapid speculative spike. Given the extremely thin liquidity, further sharp swings in either direction are likely. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.00006 to $0.00025.

Is INUTILITY a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who can tolerate total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors, retirement allocations, or anyone unable to actively monitor extremely volatile positions. Position sizing should be minimal given the combination of shallow liquidity, unknown authorities, and absent holder transparency.

What does sniper activity look like for INUTILITY?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding INUTILITY?

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$17.87K) relative to FDV (~$172.52K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Violent price swings within hours (-49.2% in 1h, +333.2% in 24h) indicative of a highly speculative, likely newly-launched token • No holder distribution data available, preventing verification of whale concentration or rug risk from large holders

Track INUTILITY