FOOTFAN

FootFan Price Prediction 2026

FOOTFAN
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 13, 2026

FTsxSayCXp9qtVXW9qpMSx5Dw1UrzwYF2E8ET4gQpump

$0.051474

FDV $1,472

LiveContract:FTsxSayCXp9qtVXW9qpMSx5Dw1UrzwYF2E8ET4gQpumpChain:SolanaHolders:66Market cap:$1,472

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about FOOTFAN

Report snapshotas of Jun 13, 10:17 AM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$17,860

Holders

151

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

FOOTFAN (FTsxSayCXp9qtVXW9qpMSx5Dw1UrzwYF2E8ET4gQpump) is an extremely high-risk Solana meme/spam token launched on PumpSwap. The token has experienced a catastrophic -95.13% price collapse in 24 hours, dropping from ~$0.0000359 to ~$0.00000176. Total liquidity stands at only $17.86K against a fully diluted valuation of $1.76K, indicating the market cap has already fallen below liquidity. The token exhibits numerous red flags: a total supply of 1 (with fractional balances suggesting the displayed supply figure is misleading or the decimals/supply data is anomalous), unverified contract, mutable metadata with unknown update authority, and deeply abnormal holder percentage figures (top holder shows 11,524,596,944,845,700% of supply). The holder data is internally inconsistent and likely corrupted or manipulated. This token presents extreme risk and shows characteristics consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Catastrophic 24h price collapse of -95.13%, from ~$0.0000359 to ~$0.00000176
Anomalous holder percentage data — top holder shows trillions of percent of supply, indicating corrupted or manipulated on-chain data
Total liquidity of only $17.86K with FDV of $1.76K — market cap has fallen below liquidity pool value
Metadata is mutable with unknown update authority, posing rug/freeze risk
Historical holder count was flat at 39 for 30 days before a sudden spike to 151 in the last 24h — consistent with artificial activity

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token has already collapsed -95.13% in 24 hours. The most recent hourly candle (10:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000770 and closed at $0.00000176, a near-total wipeout within a single hour. The 5-minute change is -45.53%, indicating continued freefall. With only $17.86K in liquidity and sell pressure at 51.8%, further downside is highly probable. Price is essentially at or near zero.

Target low$0.0000001
Target high$0.000005
Support: $0.00000162 (hourly candle low, candle [1]), $0.0000000 (effective floor)
Resistance: $0.00000796 (candle [2] open), $0.0000137 (candle [2] high midpoint), $0.0000966 (candle [1] high)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Given the near-total price collapse, extremely thin liquidity ($17.86K), mutable and unverified contract, and no evidence of organic community growth over the prior 30 days (flat at 39 holders), recovery is highly unlikely. The token shows all hallmarks of a completed pump-and-dump cycle.

Catalysts
  • Any remaining liquidity withdrawal would push price to effectively zero
  • Mutable metadata could be updated to further manipulate token presentation
  • No social or fundamental catalysts identified in the data

Bullish factors

  • 24h buyer count (1,790) is nearly equal to seller count (1,786), suggesting some residual demand
  • 24h buy volume of $250.91K shows some participants are still entering
  • Holder count grew from 39 to 151 in 24h (+74%), though this may be artificial

Bearish factors

  • Price collapsed -95.13% in 24 hours
  • 5-minute price change is -45.53%, indicating active freefall at time of analysis
  • Total liquidity of only $17.86K — extremely shallow, high slippage risk
  • FDV ($1.76K) is now below liquidity pool value, a deeply distressed signal
  • Sell volume ($269.85K) exceeds buy volume ($250.91K) with 51.8% sell pressure
  • Metadata is mutable with unknown update authority
  • Historical holder count was flat at 39 for 30 consecutive days before sudden spike — no organic growth
  • Anomalous holder percentage data suggests corrupted or manipulated on-chain state
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to severely corrupted/anomalous holder percentage data, only 2 OHLC candles available, and the extreme volatility of this micro-cap token. The directional bias (bearish) is high-confidence, but precise price targets are unreliable given the near-zero price and thin liquidity.

FOOTFAN call history

Full track record →
Jun 13bearish
24h-6.7%
7d-13.6%
30d-5.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (09:00 UTC): O=$0.0000253, H=$0.0000137 (note: high $0.000136580 > open, strong upward wick), C=$0.0000798 — a bullish candle with significant upper wick. Candle [1] (10:00 UTC): O=$0.0000770, H=$0.0000954, L=$0.00000162, C=$0.00000176 — a massive bearish engulfing/crash candle. The open was near the prior close, briefly made a new high ($0.0000954), then collapsed to a low of $0.00000162, closing near the low. This is a classic 'blow-off top and crash' pattern. The candle body is almost entirely red, with a tiny lower wick, indicating near-total capitulation within the hour.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 48%Sell 52%

Both available candles, when read together, show a sharp pump followed by an immediate and severe dump. The short-term and medium-term trend is decisively bearish/downtrend. There is no technical basis for a trend reversal given the available data.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.00000162 (candle [1] hourly low)
Major$0.0000000 (effective zero — no meaningful support below current price)
Resistance
Immediate$0.00000796 (candle [2] open, $0.0000253)
Major$0.0000954 (candle [1] high — the blow-off top)

The only meaningful support is the candle [1] low of $0.00000162, which is essentially the current price. There is no established support below this level. Resistance exists at the candle [2] open (~$0.0000253) and the blow-off top high (~$0.0000954). Recovery to either resistance level would require a 14x–54x move from current price, which is extremely unlikely given the liquidity and market conditions.

Notable patterns

  • Blow-off top and crash: candle [1] briefly made a new high before collapsing to near-zero within the same hour
  • Massive bearish engulfing candle: candle [1] opened near candle [2] close and closed near the session low
  • Volume climax in candle [2] followed by sharp volume decline in candle [1] — classic pump-and-dump volume signature
  • No higher highs or accumulation patterns visible — only a single pump spike followed by collapse

Total holders151
24h Δ+74
7d Δ+74
30d Δ+74
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder count grew +74% in the last 24 hours (from 39 to 151), but this growth coincided with a -95.13% price collapse — a strongly negative correlation. The 30-day historical data shows the holder count was completely flat at 39 for the entire period from 2026-05-14 to 2026-06-12, with zero net change on any day. The sudden spike to 151 holders in the last 24 hours is anomalous and likely reflects bot activity, airdrop distribution, or artificial inflation rather than genuine organic adoption.

The holder history is deeply suspicious. For 30 consecutive days (2026-05-14 to 2026-06-12), the holder count was frozen at exactly 39 with zero net change on every single day. Then, in the last 24 hours, holders jumped to 151 (+112, +74%). This pattern is inconsistent with organic growth and is a strong red flag. The 1-hour change of -246 (-160%) is mathematically anomalous (cannot lose more holders than exist) and suggests data corruption or a tracking artifact. The distribution data (whales=319, sharks=73, dolphins=317, fish=122, octopus=51) sums to 882 categories across only 151 holders, which is also internally inconsistent and likely corrupted. No meaningful holder trend analysis can be performed with confidence.

Top 10 hold26.04%
Top 100 hold56.67%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

HSz7RdT6LcCpWLsnNKri3xktp6q36F5if8uRqJFd2D5r

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address — matches the trading pair address listed in price data)

26.04%

CQpdHFqAZopFPmmyFbQphV5LY3ieUURa6WYzQiGyTQE6

Individual whale or early buyer

4.56%

3sFiLKJjNqjYGgfR1CQFY8SzYTeAVasQpLJPpzBQN8Ab

Individual whale or early buyer

4.33%

137PhmBQiaKbTXQvVYRJhKs8Nyr1JtKmA6d1CaSmVt8Z

Individual whale or early buyer

4.19%

9RPNDkgTHVBPKkt2pMMhUahf7FGtpDkbLdHSdVJm1VYh

Individual whale or early buyer

3.91%

The top 10 holders control 26.04% of supply and the top 100 control 56.67%. The largest single holder (HSz7RdT6LcCpWLsnNKri3xktp6q36F5if8uRqJFd2D5r) is the PumpSwap liquidity pool address, which matches the trading pair address in the price data. CRITICAL NOTE: The holder percentage figures in the raw data are wildly anomalous — the top holder shows 11,524,596,944,845,700% of supply, which is physically impossible. The 26.04% top-10 figure from the supply concentration section appears to be the correct normalized figure and is used here. The anomalous raw balance figures suggest either a decimal/supply reporting error or data corruption. With the liquidity pool as the top holder and multiple individual whales holding 3-4% each, distribution is concentrated. The price collapse suggests whales are actively distributing/selling.

Liquidity$17,860
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$250,910
Sell$269,850
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers1,790
Unique sellers1,786

Liquidity is critically thin at $17.86K total. The FDV of $1.76K has fallen below the liquidity pool value, indicating the token is essentially worthless relative to its own liquidity. The 24h trading volume ($520.76K combined) is approximately 29x the total liquidity, indicating extreme churn and high slippage risk for any meaningful position. Sell volume ($269.85K, 51.8%) slightly exceeds buy volume ($250.91K, 48.2%), confirming net outflow. The number of unique buyers (1,790) and sellers (1,786) are nearly identical, suggesting wash trading or bot activity may be inflating volume figures. Any attempt to exit a position of meaningful size would face severe slippage given the shallow liquidity pool.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (formatted) — NOTE: Raw balance figures in holder data show values in the trillions, suggesting the formatted supply of '1' may reflect a display artifact with 0 decimals. The actual on-chain supply appears to be in the hundreds of trillions of base units.
FDV$1,760

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token metadata lists decimals as 0 and total supply (formatted) as 1, yet holder balances show values in the tens of trillions. This is a severe internal inconsistency — either the supply data is corrupted, the decimals field is incorrect, or the formatted supply figure is misleading. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the token is mutable, meaning metadata can be changed at any time by whoever holds the update authority. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data. The combination of mutable metadata, unknown authorities, and unverified contract creates significant rug risk. The FDV of $1,760 is negligible and has already fallen below the liquidity pool value of $17,860.

Volatility
high

Price collapsed -95.13% in 24 hours. The most recent hourly candle shows a blow-off top followed by near-total collapse within a single hour. 5-minute change is -45.53%, indicating active freefall.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $17.86K. The FDV ($1,760) has fallen below the liquidity pool value. 24h volume is ~29x total liquidity, indicating extreme slippage risk for any exit attempt.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 26.04% of supply; top 100 control 56.67%. The largest holder is the DEX liquidity pool. Multiple individual whales hold 3-4% each and appear to be distributing.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available. However, the price action (sharp pump followed by -95% collapse) is highly consistent with a sniper/early buyer dump. Risk is elevated by inference from price action.

Authority
high

Metadata is mutable with unknown update authority. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. The contract is unverified. These factors create significant rug pull and freeze risk.

Key risks

  • Near-total price collapse (-95.13% in 24h) with continued freefall (-45.53% in 5 minutes)
  • Critically thin liquidity ($17.86K) — any sell pressure will cause extreme slippage
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull risk
  • Unverified contract — no code audit or transparency
  • Anomalous and internally inconsistent on-chain data (holder percentages in trillions, supply/decimal mismatch) — possible data manipulation or corrupted state
  • 30 days of zero holder growth followed by sudden artificial-looking spike — no organic community
  • FDV has fallen below liquidity pool value — token is effectively insolvent

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buyer count (1,790) nearly matches seller count (1,786) — some residual two-sided market exists
  • Token is listed on PumpSwap with a functioning trading pair
  • Social links (telegram, twitter, website) are listed, suggesting some minimal project presence
Suitable for: This token is NOT suitable for any investor. It exhibits all hallmarks of a completed pump-and-dump scheme: near-zero liquidity, -95% price collapse, anomalous on-chain data, mutable/unverified contract, and no evidence of organic community growth. Only participants who can afford a total loss of capital should consider any interaction, and even then, the risk/reward is extremely unfavorable at current price levels.

FOOTFAN presents no credible investment thesis. The token has experienced a near-total price collapse (-95.13% in 24h), has critically thin liquidity ($17.86K), anomalous and internally inconsistent on-chain data, mutable metadata with unknown authorities, and 30 days of zero organic holder growth. The trading pattern is consistent with a completed pump-and-dump cycle. There is no fundamental value proposition, no verified contract, and no evidence of genuine community or utility.

Bull case (low)

Speculative dead-cat bounce: If remaining liquidity attracts momentum traders, a brief technical bounce from deeply oversold levels is possible.

  • Token is at near-zero price, attracting speculative micro-cap gamblers
  • Buyer count (1,790) nearly matches seller count (1,786), suggesting some residual demand
  • Social media presence (telegram, twitter, website) could generate brief renewed interest

Base case

Token trades near zero with minimal volume, gradually losing all remaining liquidity as participants exit. No recovery to prior price levels.

  • No new catalysts or marketing campaigns emerge
  • Remaining holders gradually exit through the thin liquidity pool
  • Update authority does not execute a rug pull (liquidity removal) immediately
  • Token remains technically tradeable but at effectively zero value

Bear case (high)

Complete collapse to zero: Remaining liquidity is withdrawn by the pool operator, or continued sell pressure exhausts the $17.86K liquidity pool, rendering the token untradeable.

  • FDV ($1,760) already below liquidity pool value ($17,860) — token is effectively insolvent
  • Mutable metadata and unknown update authority enable rug pull at any time
  • No organic community growth for 30+ days prior to the pump event
  • Continued freefall: -45.53% in the last 5 minutes at time of analysis
  • Anomalous on-chain data suggests possible manipulation or technical failure

GeneratedJun 13, 10:17 AM
Data freshnessMost recent candle: 2026-06-13T10:00:00.000Z. Holder data and trading analytics appear current as of analysis time. Historical holder series covers 2026-05-14 to 2026-06-12.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Mint: FTsxSayCXp9qtVXW9qpMSx5Dw1UrzwYF2E8ET4gQpump)
  • PumpSwap trading pair data (HSz7RdT6LcCpWLsnNKri3xktp6q36F5if8uRqJFd2D5r)
  • OHLC candle data (hourly, 2 candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buyer/seller counts, liquidity)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Historical holder series (30 days daily)
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (no data available)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Holder percentage figures in raw data are anomalous (values in trillions of percent) — normalized supply concentration figures used instead
  • Total supply of '1' with 0 decimals is inconsistent with holder balance data showing trillions of base units — supply/decimal data may be corrupted
  • No sniper data available — smart money analysis is severely limited
  • 1-hour holder change of -246 (-160%) is mathematically impossible and indicates data corruption
  • Distribution category totals (882) exceed total holder count (151) — data inconsistency
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm mint/freeze authority status
  • Metadata is mutable — on-chain state could change after analysis

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. The data analyzed contains multiple anomalies and inconsistencies that reduce analytical confidence. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens on Solana, carry extreme risk of total loss. This token exhibits characteristics consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Always conduct your own due diligence.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (formatted) — NOTE: Raw balance figures in holder data show values in the trillions, suggesting the formatted supply of '1' may reflect a display artifact with 0 decimals. The actual on-chain supply appears to be in the hundreds of trillions of base units.

Key Risks

Near-total price collapse (-95.13% in 24h) with continued freefall (-45.53% in 5 minutes)
Critically thin liquidity ($17.86K) — any sell pressure will cause extreme slippage
Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull risk
Unverified contract — no code audit or transparency

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for FOOTFAN. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. The absence of sniper data, combined with the token's extreme price collapse and anomalous on-chain metrics, limits confidence in any smart money assessment. The trading pattern (high volume pump followed by immediate crash) is consistent with coordinated early buyer exit, but this cannot be confirmed without sniper data.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available for this token.

Unknown — no sniper data available. However, the -95.13% price collapse strongly suggests early buyers (if any profited) have already exited, leaving late entrants with near-total losses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for FootFan (FOOTFAN)?

The token has already collapsed -95.13% in 24 hours. The most recent hourly candle (10:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000770 and closed at $0.00000176, a near-total wipeout within a single hour. The 5-minute change is -45.53%, indicating continued freefall. With only $17.86K in liquidity and sell pressure at 51.8%, further downside is highly probable. Price is essentially at or near zero. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000001 to $0.000005.

Is FOOTFAN a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.5/100. This token is NOT suitable for any investor. It exhibits all hallmarks of a completed pump-and-dump scheme: near-zero liquidity, -95% price collapse, anomalous on-chain data, mutable/unverified contract, and no evidence of organic community growth. Only participants who can afford a total loss of capital should consider any interaction, and even then, the risk/reward is extremely unfavorable at current price levels.

How are FOOTFAN holders trending?

FootFan currently has 151 holders and is growing (24h: 74, 7d: 74, 30d: 74). The holder history is deeply suspicious. For 30 consecutive days (2026-05-14 to 2026-06-12), the holder count was frozen at exactly 39 with zero net change on every single day. Then, in the last 24 hours, holders jumped to 151 (+112, +74%). This pattern is inconsistent with organic growth and is a strong red flag. The 1-hour change of -246 (-160%) is mathematically anomalous (cannot lose more holders than exist) and suggests data corruption or a tracking artifact. The distribution data (whales=319, sharks=73, dolphins=317, fish=122, octopus=51) sums to 882 categories across only 151 holders, which is also internally inconsistent and likely corrupted. No meaningful holder trend analysis can be performed with confidence.

What does sniper activity look like for FOOTFAN?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding FOOTFAN?

Near-total price collapse (-95.13% in 24h) with continued freefall (-45.53% in 5 minutes) • Critically thin liquidity ($17.86K) — any sell pressure will cause extreme slippage • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull risk

Track FOOTFAN