INTC

Intel - Backpack Securities - DE Price Today & AI Analysis

INTCSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 20, 2026

Price

$0.041390

+126.08% 24h · FDV $1,389,982

Contract

Live
FH32EfzBKJhz2JDp3TQVccPKj7WVeq3cr2DvHjkoo9zc

Chain

Holders

3,362

Market cap

$1,389,982

More tokens on Solana

Intel - Backpack Securities - DE: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-20 12:15 UTC

Holder addresses

3,362

Top 10 supply share

14.77%

Reported liquidity

$176,853.00
How concentrated is Intel - Backpack Securities - DE ownership?
As of 2026-09-20 12:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 14.77% of supply. It reports 3,362 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Intel - Backpack Securities - DE?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-20 12:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $7,096,906.00 in buys and $7,008,236.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Intel - Backpack Securities - DE liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +27.49%, from $138,713.62 (2026-09-20 10:00 UTC) to $176,852.90 (2026-09-20 12:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-20 12:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-20 10:00 UTC$138,713.62
2026-09-20 11:00 UTC$171,390.07
2026-09-20 12:00 UTC$176,852.90

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about INTC

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Sep 20, 12:16 PM UTC

FDV

$1,389,982

Liquidity

$176,853.00

Holders

3,362

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

INTC ("Intel - Backpack Securities - DE") is a micro-cap SPL token trading on PumpSwap (pair 4C9gU6EUFDZY6o9WAz3wjwW4f6MpMJdACmcENfBkFttm) with a current price of $0.0000138998 and a fully diluted valuation of roughly $1.39M. The token has just experienced an extreme, likely low-liquidity-driven price spike (+126% in 24h, one hourly candle showing a move from ~9.9e-11 to as high as 0.00235 before collapsing back to ~1e-6-1.4e-5), which is a classic signature of a very thin, newly-seeded pool rather than organic demand. Total liquidity is only ~$176.85K against a $1.39M FDV, and holder concentration data is limited to a single snapshot (3,362 holder addresses, top-10 holding ~14.77% of supply). No sniper data, no authority-renouncement data, and no holder-history/classification data are available, which materially limits confidence in this analysis. The name, description, and lack of verified social links / verified-contract status are unconfirmed claims made by the token creator and should not be treated as validated facts.

Key points

  • Extreme recent volatility: 24h price change of +126%, with an hourly candle range spanning several orders of magnitude (9.9e-11 to 0.00235), suggesting a very early-stage or possibly manipulated pool
  • Thin liquidity ($176.85K) relative to $1.39M FDV, implying high slippage and fragility
  • High buy/sell trade-count imbalance: 12,697 buys vs 7,756 sells, but only 145 unique sellers vs 3,411 unique buyers 24h — consistent with early speculative accumulation but also with wash-trading patterns
  • No sniper, authority, or holder-history data available — key rug/manipulation risk indicators are unknown, not confirmed safe
  • Top-10 holders control only ~14.77% of supply per the single available snapshot, which on its face looks decentralized, but this cannot be corroborated with trend data

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-72 hours

neutral

The token just underwent a violent repricing event (hourly candle low of 9.9e-11 rocketing to a high of 0.00235 then settling near 0.0000139), which is symptomatic of a brand-new/thin PumpSwap pool rather than sustainable trend. Near-term price action is likely to remain highly volatile and could retrace sharply or continue erratic swings given the shallow $176.85K liquidity base.

Target low

0.0000070

Target high

0.0000210

Support

0.0000133 (recent hourly low/close cluster), 0.0000098 (prior candle open)

Resistance

0.0000141 (most recent hourly high), 0.0000236 (candle spike high, likely an outlier/wick)

Medium term · 1-4 weeks

bearish

Absent verified fundamentals (no socials, no verified contract, no authority data, no sustained holder growth history), tokens exhibiting this pump pattern on PumpSwap with thin liquidity frequently mean-revert or fade as early buyers take profit. Without new catalysts or liquidity growth, medium-term downside risk outweighs upside.

Catalysts

  • Potential liquidity additions or CEX/DEX aggregator listings could support price
  • Continued retail buyer interest (3,411 unique 24h buyers) could sustain momentum short-term
  • Any clarification on contract verification, authority renouncement, or team identity could reduce risk premium and support price
  • Conversely, profit-taking from the 145 active sellers, most of whom traded during a >100% pump, is a strong bearish catalyst

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume ($7.10M) slightly exceeds sell volume ($7.01M), a marginal net positive at 50.3%/49.7%
  • Large disparity between buyers (3,411) and sellers (145) 24h suggests broad new interest, though this could also reflect early-stage FOMO rather than durable demand
  • Top-10 concentration of 14.77% is relatively low for a micro-cap token, on the single snapshot available

Bearish factors

  • Extreme intraday volatility (candle spanning ~9.9e-11 to 0.00235) signals an unstable, likely manipulated or newly-launched thin pool
  • Liquidity of only $176.85K against $1.39M FDV creates high slippage risk and vulnerability to large sell orders
  • No mint/freeze authority data, no sniper data, and no verified contract status — key rug-pull risk factors are entirely unknown
  • 145 sellers moving significant volume relative to buyer count could represent early insiders/snipers cashing out into retail demand

Confidence: low. Only three hourly candles and a single holder snapshot are available; there is no historical trend data, no sniper data, and no authority verification. The extreme volatility observed makes any projection highly speculative.

INTC call history

Full track record →

Sep 20neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
FH32Ef...o9zc
Total Supply
99,999,999,997.65 (raw units, 6 decimals)

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($176.85K) relative to reported volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
  • No sniper data available to assess insider dumping risk despite an extremely volatile opening candle
  • Only a single holder snapshot with no historical trend, limiting ability to detect accumulation/distribution patterns

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 shows an extreme wick from near-zero (9.9e-11) up to 0.00235 before closing at 0.00000976 — indicative of a bootstrapping/seeding event or a thin-liquidity flash spike. Candle 2 opened at 0.00000976, ran up to a high of 0.0000135, and closed near the high at 0.0000134 (bullish candle). Candle 3 opened at 0.0000134, made a marginal new high of 0.0000141, dipped to a low of 0.0000134, and closed at 0.0000139 — a smaller-bodied continuation candle with reduced volume (1.71M vs 6.54M and 5.86M in prior hours), suggesting momentum is decelerating.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price action (last 2 hours) shows higher lows and higher highs, forming a short-term uptrend off the initial spike/reset. However, with only 3 candles of data, no medium-term trend can be reliably established; classified as sideways/undetermined pending more history.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

0.0000134 (candle 3 low / candle 2 close area)

Major support

0.0000098 (candle 2 open, near pre-spike level)

Immediate resistance

0.0000141 (candle 3 high)

Major resistance

0.00235 (candle 1 wick high, likely an anomalous outlier not a reliable technical level)

Price is currently consolidating just under its recent hourly high of 0.0000141, with support forming near 0.0000134. The candle 1 high of 0.00235 is almost two orders of magnitude above current price and most likely reflects a flash-print/outlier rather than a tradable resistance zone; it should be treated with caution.

Notable patterns

  • Extreme wick/outlier candle on candle 1, consistent with pool seeding or a flash manipulation print
  • Two consecutive bullish candles with higher highs and higher lows (candles 2 and 3), a short-term bullish continuation pattern
  • Decelerating volume on the latest candle despite price making a marginal new high — a potential bearish divergence signal

Liquidity

Liquidity

$176,853.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of ~$176.85K is very shallow relative to both the $1.39M FDV and the enormous 24h trading volume of ~$14.11M combined (buy+sell). This mismatch between reported volume and pool depth is a red flag: such volume could not be absorbed by this liquidity without extreme price impact, which aligns with the observed 126% 24h price swing. Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.3% buy vs 49.7% sell), but the stark asymmetry between unique buyers (3,411) and unique sellers (145) suggests either a large cohort of small retail buyers entering against a small number of large sellers, or volume/wallet figures that warrant skepticism given the shallow liquidity base. Slippage risk is high for any meaningfully sized trade.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

99,999,999,997.65 (raw units, 6 decimals)

FDV

$1,389,982

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +126% and an hourly candle wick spanning roughly 4 orders of magnitude (9.9e-11 to 0.00235) indicate extreme, likely unstable price behavior typical of a very early-stage or thinly-traded pool.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only ~$176.85K against $1.39M FDV and ~$14.11M combined 24h volume is shallow; large trades would likely cause significant slippage and the pool could be vulnerable to rapid drain.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Only a single snapshot showing top-10 holders at ~14.77% of supply is available; top-100 concentration and any historical accumulation/distribution trends are unavailable, so true concentration risk cannot be fully assessed.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($176.85K) relative to reported volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
  • No sniper data available to assess insider dumping risk despite an extremely volatile opening candle
  • Only a single holder snapshot with no historical trend, limiting ability to detect accumulation/distribution patterns
  • No verified contract status, no social links, and no description provided — very limited due-diligence trail on this token's legitimacy
  • Extreme 126% 24h price swing suggests the token may be in an unstable, early post-launch phase prone to sharp reversals

Mitigating factors

  • Top-10 holder concentration of 14.77% (single snapshot) is not unusually high for a micro-cap token, though this cannot be confirmed as a trend
  • 24h buy and sell volumes are roughly balanced (50.3%/49.7%), which does not show an obvious one-sided dump in progress
  • A relatively high number of unique 24h buyers (3,411) versus few sellers (145) suggests broad retail participation rather than concentrated selling, though this is not fully verifiable

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. It is not appropriate for conservative investors or those seeking exposure to established, verified projects, given the combination of shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, and multiple unknown risk factors (authorities, sniper activity, holder history).

INTC is a highly speculative, newly volatile micro-cap token on PumpSwap with a thin liquidity base and numerous unresolved due-diligence gaps (authority status, sniper activity, holder history). Any investment thesis here is fundamentally speculative and should be sized and risk-managed accordingly.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the current retail buying momentum (3,411 unique 24h buyers vs. 145 sellers) continues and liquidity providers deepen the pool, price could extend its short-term uptrend, with speculative capital rotating into the token on continued PumpSwap/social attention.

  • Sustained broad-based retail buyer interest outpacing sellers
  • Growth in liquidity depth reducing slippage and attracting larger buyers
  • Possible future verification of contract/authority status that reduces perceived risk
  • Continued short-term bullish candle structure (higher highs/higher lows over last 2 hours)

Base Case

Price likely continues to exhibit high volatility and consolidates within a wide range around current levels ($0.0000070–$0.0000210) over the next few days as the market digests the initial pump, absent new catalysts or liquidity growth.

  • No major liquidity injections or authority disclosures occur in the near term
  • Trading remains dominated by short-term speculative retail flow rather than long-term holders
  • No confirmed rug-pull or authority-based supply/freeze event occurs during the observation window

Bear Case

High probability

The extreme initial price spike (from near-zero to 0.00235 before settling near 0.0000139) is unwound as early holders or unidentified large sellers take profit into the shallow $176.85K liquidity pool, causing a sharp price collapse.

  • Decelerating hourly volume despite marginal new price highs (bearish divergence)
  • Extremely shallow liquidity relative to volume and FDV, making the token vulnerable to large sell orders
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status and absent sniper data leave open the possibility of insider dumping or supply manipulation
  • Lack of verified contract, socials, or project description reduces confidence in long-term viability

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 20, 12:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-20 12:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, decimals, supply, FDV)
  • USD price and 24h change data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent candles) from PumpSwap pair
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
  • Codex holder aggregate snapshot (holder count, top-10 concentration)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were provided, severely limiting technical trend analysis
  • No sniper wallet data was available, preventing assessment of insider/sniper dumping risk
  • No mint or freeze authority verification data was available
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available, only a single current snapshot
  • No top-100 holder concentration, wallet classification, or notable-holder labeling data was available
  • No verified-contract, mutability, or social-link data was available to assess project legitimacy
  • Reported 24h volume (~$14.11M combined) appears disproportionately large relative to total liquidity (~$176.85K), which may indicate data inconsistencies, wash trading, or an extremely thin/volatile pool

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, possibly incomplete or adversarially-supplied on-chain data and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in micro-cap and newly-launched tokens, carry a very high risk of total capital loss. Conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Intel - Backpack Securities - DE ownership?

As of 2026-09-20 12:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 14.77% of supply. It reports 3,362 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Intel - Backpack Securities - DE?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-20 12:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $7,096,906.00 in buys and $7,008,236.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Intel - Backpack Securities - DE liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +27.49%, from $138,713.62 (2026-09-20 10:00 UTC) to $176,852.90 (2026-09-20 12:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Intel - Backpack Securities - DE (INTC)?

The token just underwent a violent repricing event (hourly candle low of 9.9e-11 rocketing to a high of 0.00235 then settling near 0.0000139), which is symptomatic of a brand-new/thin PumpSwap pool rather than sustainable trend. Near-term price action is likely to remain highly volatile and could retrace sharply or continue erratic swings given the shallow $176.85K liquidity base. Short-term outlook is neutral (24-72 hours), with a target range of 0.0000070 to 0.0000210.

Is INTC a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. It is not appropriate for conservative investors or those seeking exposure to established, verified projects, given the combination of shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, and multiple unknown risk factors (authorities, sniper activity, holder history).

What are the key risks of holding INTC?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($176.85K) relative to reported volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing • No sniper data available to assess insider dumping risk despite an extremely volatile opening candle

← Back to all predictions

Track INTC