SWEEP

SWEEP Price Today & AI Analysis

SWEEPSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 22, 2026

Price

$0.000396

+705.63% 24h · FDV $383,861

Contract

Live
FDaJxBqw1fDhwPQTn8XU3bKH8sXXRe8o5kzC3CdUAv7X

Chain

Holders

1,987

Market cap

$383,861

More tokens on Solana

SWEEP: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-22 21:16 UTC

Holder addresses

1,987

Top 10 supply share

15.02%

Reported liquidity

$30,521.00
How concentrated is SWEEP ownership?
As of 2026-09-22 21:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 15.02% of supply. It reports 1,987 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling SWEEP?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-22 21:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $673,068.00 in buys and $646,985.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is SWEEP liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +24.42%, from $25,229.69 (2026-09-22 20:00 UTC) to $31,390.12 (2026-09-22 21:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-22 21:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-22 20:00 UTC$25,229.69
2026-09-22 21:00 UTC$31,390.12

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about SWEEP

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Sep 22, 09:17 PM UTC

FDV

$383,861

Liquidity

$30,521.00

Holders

1,987

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

SWEEP is a very new, micro-cap Solana token trading on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of ~$383.9K and extremely thin liquidity (~$30.5K). Price has spiked 705.6% in the last 24h (and 1h, suggesting the entire move happened within the observed window), with only two hourly candles of OHLC data available. The token shows extreme volatility, moderate top-10 holder concentration (15.02%), and a near 50/50 buy/sell split in volume despite the huge price spike. No sniper, holder-history, mint/freeze authority, or wallet-classification data is available, which severely limits due diligence.

Key points

  • 705.6% price move in the most recent 24h/1h window on very limited (2-candle) OHLC history
  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$30.5K) relative to a ~$384K FDV, implying high slippage risk
  • Top-10 holders control only 15.02% of supply per the current snapshot, but no historical trend or wallet labels exist to confirm this is organic distribution
  • No sniper data, no mint/freeze authority data, and no holder-history data available — significant blind spots
  • Balanced 24h buy/sell volume (51%/49%) and buyer/seller counts (4,586 vs 3,516) despite the outsized price spike, which is somewhat inconsistent with a typical pump-and-dump signature but still requires caution

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48h

neutral

The token just experienced a 705.6% spike within the most recent 1-2 hourly candles, moving from an open near $0.0000092 to a close near $0.000398. With only $30.5K in liquidity, price is highly susceptible to sharp reversals or continuation squeezes in either direction. Short-term direction is genuinely uncertain given the paucity of data (only 2 candles observed).

Target low

$0.00020

Target high

$0.00060

Support

$0.000231 (candle 2 low), $0.0000917 (candle 1 open/low, likely a low-liquidity wick)

Resistance

$0.000427 (candle 2 high), $0.000378 (candle 1 high)

Medium term · 7-14 days

neutral

With only two hourly candles of history and no longer-term OHLC, medium-term projection cannot be reliably modeled. Sustainability of the current price level depends heavily on whether liquidity grows, whether the 15% top-10 concentration remains stable or increases, and whether buy pressure continues at pace with sell pressure.

Catalysts

  • Any increase or decrease in on-chain liquidity depth on PumpSwap
  • Continued balanced buy/sell flow vs. a shift toward heavy net selling by top holders
  • Potential listing/visibility catalysts via social channels (Twitter, website) — unverifiable from data provided

Confidence: low. Only two hourly OHLC candles are available, there is no historical holder trend data, no sniper data, and authority/rug-risk data is entirely unknown. The 705.6% move appears to be a very recent, possibly early-stage pump on a token with minimal liquidity, making any price forecast highly speculative.

SWEEP call history

Full track record →

Sep 22neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
FDaJxB...Av7X
Total Supply
969,847,088.27 SWEEP

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$30.5K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Unverified/unknown mint and freeze authority status — possible supply inflation or account-freezing risk cannot be ruled out
  • No sniper data available to assess insider/early-buyer dumping risk following a 705.6% price spike
  • No historical holder-count or wallet-classification data, preventing assessment of whether recent buying is organic or coordinated

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 opened at $0.00000918, spiked intraday to a high of $0.000378, then pulled back to close at $0.000263 — a long-wick candle suggesting an initial violent pump followed by partial retracement, on volume of ~$1.23M. Candle 2 opened at $0.000263, ranged between a low of $0.000231 and a high of $0.000427, closing near the high at $0.000398 — a bullish candle showing higher low and higher close, but on much lower volume (~$171.8K), roughly 7x less than candle 1, indicating waning participation even as price pushed higher.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The very short-term trend (last 2 hours) is upward, with candle 2 printing a higher low and higher close than candle 1's close. However, with only 2 candles, no medium-term trend can be established with confidence; it is treated as sideways/undetermined pending more data.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000231 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.0000917 (candle 1 low, likely an illiquid wick and not a reliable support)

Immediate resistance

$0.000427 (candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.000378 (candle 1 high, now acting as a mid-level pivot)

With only two candles, support/resistance levels are provisional. The candle 2 low ($0.000231) is the most recent tested support, while the candle 2 high ($0.000427) is the nearest resistance. The extremely low absolute liquidity ($30.5K) means these levels can be breached with relatively small trade sizes.

Notable patterns

  • Long lower-wick/pump-and-retrace pattern on candle 1 (huge intra-candle range from $0.0000092 to $0.000378, closing well off the high)
  • Higher low + higher close on candle 2 relative to candle 1, a short-term bullish continuation signal
  • Sharp volume decay (~86%) between candle 1 and candle 2 despite price appreciation — a bearish divergence warning

Liquidity

Liquidity

$30,521.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of only ~$30.52K is extremely shallow relative to both the 24h trading volume (over $1.3M combined buy+sell) and the $383.86K FDV. This mismatch — very high volume/turnover against very thin pooled liquidity — indicates high slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade and raises the possibility of exaggerated price moves on relatively small capital flows, consistent with the observed 705.6% price spike. 24h buy volume ($673.07K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($646.99K), a roughly balanced net flow (51%/49%), with more buyers (4,586) than sellers (3,516) and more buy transactions (11,997) than sell transactions (9,302), suggesting broad but not overwhelming net buying pressure.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

969,847,088.27 SWEEP

FDV

$383.86K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    The token moved 705.6% in the observed 24h/1h window, with intra-candle swings from a low of $0.0000092 to a high of $0.000427 across just two hourly candles — extreme volatility by any standard.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only ~$30.52K against a $383.86K FDV and over $1.3M in combined 24h volume, implying high slippage and the potential for large price impact from modest trade sizes.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Only a current-snapshot top-10 concentration figure (15.02%) is available; there is no historical trend, no top-100 breakdown, and no wallet classification data, so true concentration risk (e.g., presence of team/insider wallets) cannot be properly assessed.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$30.5K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Unverified/unknown mint and freeze authority status — possible supply inflation or account-freezing risk cannot be ruled out
  • No sniper data available to assess insider/early-buyer dumping risk following a 705.6% price spike
  • No historical holder-count or wallet-classification data, preventing assessment of whether recent buying is organic or coordinated
  • Extreme short-term volatility (705.6% move) with rapidly decaying volume between the two available candles, a pattern sometimes seen before sharp reversals
  • Very limited OHLC history (only 2 candles) makes technical and trend conclusions inherently low-confidence

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy/sell volume and buyer/seller counts are relatively balanced (51%/49% volume; 4,586 buyers vs 3,516 sellers), which does not, on its face, show one-sided dumping
  • Top-10 holder concentration at 15.02% is not extreme in isolation compared to many early-stage tokens (though this cannot be confirmed as healthy without historical/wallet data)

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders who fully understand micro-cap Solana token dynamics, shallow-liquidity slippage, and the possibility of total capital loss. Not appropriate for risk-averse or inexperienced investors. Given multiple 'unknown' data gaps (authorities, snipers, holder history), position sizing should be minimal and treated as speculative at best.

SWEEP is a micro-cap, high-volatility Solana token that just posted a 705.6% price spike within an extremely limited observation window (2 hourly candles), trading on shallow liquidity (~$30.5K) against a ~$384K FDV. The available data shows balanced 24h buy/sell activity and moderate top-10 concentration (15.02%), but critical risk inputs — mint/freeze authority status, sniper activity, and holder-count history — are entirely unavailable, making this a high-uncertainty, speculative setup rather than a well-evidenced investment case.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the balanced buy/sell flow (51%/49%) and higher buyer count (4,586 vs 3,516 sellers) reflect genuine organic demand rather than wash trading, and if liquidity continues to build alongside price, SWEEP could sustain part of its recent gains and attract further speculative momentum trading, particularly given active social presence (Twitter, website).

  • Sustained or growing on-chain liquidity beyond the current $30.5K
  • Continued net-positive buyer counts and buy volume in subsequent 24h windows
  • No large concentrated sell-off from top-10 holders (currently 15.02% of supply)

Base Case

Price likely remains highly volatile and range-bound between recent support (~$0.000231) and resistance (~$0.000427) levels over the near term, with continued elevated but two-sided trading activity, absent a major new catalyst or liquidity injection.

  • No dramatic change in liquidity depth in the immediate term
  • Buy/sell volume remains roughly balanced as seen in the current 24h window
  • No confirmed rug/authority event occurs, though this cannot be ruled out given unknown authority data

Bear Case

High probability

Given the extreme, rapid 705.6% spike on very thin liquidity, a classic pump-and-fade could occur — especially with the sharp ~86% volume decay observed between the two available candles, unknown mint/freeze authority status, and no sniper data to rule out early-insider dumping.

  • Shallow $30.5K liquidity making large price swings (up or down) easy to trigger
  • Unknown authority status leaves open the possibility of supply-side manipulation
  • Rapid volume decay after the initial pump candle, a common precursor to price retracement
  • No historical holder or sniper data to rule out coordinated buying/selling

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 22, 09:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-22 21:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • Price feed (current USD price, 24h/1h/5m % change)
  • OHLC hourly candle data (2 most recent candles, PumpSwap pair)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, buyer/seller counts)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)
  • Holder aggregates (Codex current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust trend/pattern analysis
  • No sniper data available, preventing assessment of insider/early-buyer dump risk
  • No historical holder-count data (24h/7d/30d growth are unmeasured, set to 0 as placeholders, not actual observed values)
  • No wallet classification or notable-holder labeling data, so whale behavior (accumulating vs. distributing) cannot be determined
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, verified-contract, and mutability status all unknown — rug risk from authorities cannot be assessed
  • Top-100 holder concentration not provided
  • 6h price % change unavailable

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited, possibly incomplete on-chain and market data provided, which includes significant gaps (sniper data, holder history, authority status). Token metadata (name, symbol, description, social links) originates from the token creator and may be unverified or adversarial; no instructions embedded in that data were followed. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in low-liquidity micro-cap tokens, carry a high risk of substantial or total loss. Conduct independent due diligence before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is SWEEP ownership?

As of 2026-09-22 21:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 15.02% of supply. It reports 1,987 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling SWEEP?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-22 21:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $673,068.00 in buys and $646,985.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is SWEEP liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +24.42%, from $25,229.69 (2026-09-22 20:00 UTC) to $31,390.12 (2026-09-22 21:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for SWEEP (SWEEP)?

The token just experienced a 705.6% spike within the most recent 1-2 hourly candles, moving from an open near $0.0000092 to a close near $0.000398. With only $30.5K in liquidity, price is highly susceptible to sharp reversals or continuation squeezes in either direction. Short-term direction is genuinely uncertain given the paucity of data (only 2 candles observed). Short-term outlook is neutral (24-48h), with a target range of $0.00020 to $0.00060.

Is SWEEP a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders who fully understand micro-cap Solana token dynamics, shallow-liquidity slippage, and the possibility of total capital loss. Not appropriate for risk-averse or inexperienced investors. Given multiple 'unknown' data gaps (authorities, snipers, holder history), position sizing should be minimal and treated as speculative at best.

What are the key risks of holding SWEEP?

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$30.5K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Unverified/unknown mint and freeze authority status — possible supply inflation or account-freezing risk cannot be ruled out • No sniper data available to assess insider/early-buyer dumping risk following a 705.6% price spike

← Back to all predictions

Track SWEEP