SCRIBBLIFy

Scribblification Price Prediction 2026

SCRIBBLIFy
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 3, 2026

EeqtMYkiHVwxMRjhmopPfmY9Rm7G3s8Le3UZ2JswBFXo

$0.051769

FDV $1,767

LiveContract:EeqtMYkiHVwxMRjhmopPfmY9Rm7G3s8Le3UZ2JswBFXoChain:SolanaHolders:82Market cap:$1,767

More tokens on Solana

USDF

USDF

USDF

$0.0001170.0%
MC $117.1K
DAI

DAI

DAI - The World Cup Token

$0.0523812.5%
MC $2.4K
DUMB

DUMB

Dumb Money

$0.0513600.0%
MC $1.4K
$SAVEUS

$SAVEUS

Before GTA, Saved America

$0.0514531.3%
MC $1.5K
$DHS

$DHS

DiamondHandsStatue

$0.0514240.0%
MC $1.4K
CATE

CATE

Catecoin

$0.02510.3%
MC $24.15M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about SCRIBBLIFy

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of May 3, 09:50 AM
FDV

$3,072

Liquidity

$5,085

Holders

164

Snipers

36

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Scribblification (SCRIBBLIFy) is a micro-cap Solana meme/novelty token launched on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of approximately $3,072–$4,330 USD. The token has experienced a sharp 24h price decline of ~36–45% from recent highs near $0.00000593, with extremely thin liquidity ($5.09K total), heavy sell pressure (79.5% of 24h volume), and a highly concentrated holder base (top 10 hold 90.22% of supply). The token is very early-stage, having only broken out of a dormant 16-holder base on April 29–30, 2026, and is now shedding holders rapidly (-26 in 24h). Overall risk is very high.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme supply concentration: top 10 wallets hold 90.22%, with the #1 holder (likely the DEX liquidity pool ASapKNNwpv3c8PqEhE5eBb8bJZnqnBF4FLtESBZY4RuU) holding 71.20% of supply
Token was dormant at 16 holders for ~26 days before a sudden burst of activity on April 29–30, 2026
Sniper cohort is mixed: 9 of 20 snipers show positive realized PnL (up to +100.8%), while 7 show losses, indicating partial but not complete exit by early buyers
Fully diluted valuation is only ~$3,072–$4,330 USD, making this an ultra-micro-cap with extreme volatility risk
Sell pressure dominates: 79.5% of 24h volume is sells, with 83 sellers vs. 19 buyers

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
24–72 hours

Price has fallen from a 20-candle high of ~$0.00000593 (candle [20]) to the current ~$0.00000307, a decline of ~48%. Sell pressure is overwhelming (79.5% of volume), holders are dropping (-26 in 24h), and liquidity is razor-thin at $5.09K. A brief 1h uptick of +7.78% is insufficient to reverse the dominant downtrend. Further downside toward the $0.0000025–$0.0000028 range is likely unless buy volume surges materially.

Target low$0.0000020
Target high$0.0000038
Support: $0.0000028 (candle [3] open/close cluster), $0.0000025 (psychological round level below recent lows), $0.0000020 (extreme bear case / near-zero liquidity floor)
Resistance: $0.0000035 (candle [7]–[8] close cluster), $0.0000044–$0.0000047 (candle [12]–[14] consolidation zone), $0.0000054–$0.0000059 (candle [18]–[20] peak zone / all-time high area)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Without a significant catalyst — new exchange listing, viral social media moment, or coordinated buy campaign — the token is likely to continue declining or become illiquid. The holder base is contracting rapidly, smart money snipers have largely taken profits, and the FDV is already sub-$5K. Recovery to prior highs would require a 2x+ move against a backdrop of deteriorating fundamentals.

Catalysts
  • Viral social media campaign on Twitter (token has Twitter link)
  • New DEX listing or aggregator feature increasing visibility
  • Coordinated whale accumulation from one of the top non-LP holders
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifting all micro-caps

Bullish factors

  • Brief 1h price recovery of +7.78% suggests some residual buying interest
  • 7 of 20 snipers still hold positions (not fully exited), limiting immediate dump pressure from that cohort
  • Token is not flagged as spam and has social links (Twitter, Moralis)
  • 30d holder growth of +148 (from 16 to 164) shows the token attracted real interest

Bearish factors

  • 24h price decline of -36.6% to -45.4% (depending on measurement window)
  • 79.5% of 24h volume is sell-side; 83 sellers vs. only 19 buyers
  • Holders dropped -26 (-16%) in 24h, accelerating the exit trend
  • Total liquidity only $5.09K — any meaningful sell order causes severe slippage
  • Top 10 holders control 90.22% of supply, creating extreme dump risk
  • FDV of ~$3,072–$4,330 leaves little room for price appreciation without new capital
  • Sniper #9 (AgmLJBMDCqWynYnQiPCuj9ewsNNsBJXyzoUhD9LJzN51) sold $7,901 at +75.7% PnL — already extracted significant value
  • Token was dormant for 26 days before launch activity, suggesting pre-planned deployment
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the ultra-micro-cap nature of this token ($3–4K FDV), extremely thin liquidity ($5.09K), missing sniper cost-basis data (all 'sniped: unknown'), and the token's very short trading history (active only since ~April 29, 2026). Price action at this scale is highly susceptible to single-wallet manipulation.

Deep Analysis

The 20 available hourly candles (May 2–3, 2026) show a clear peak-and-decline structure. The token reached its highest point in candle [20] (May 2, 10:00 UTC) with a high of $0.00000593, followed by a sustained series of lower highs and lower lows through candle [1] (May 3, 09:00 UTC) at $0.00000307. Candles [16] and [18] show the highest volume (954 and 703 USD respectively) and wide-range bars coinciding with the price peak and initial breakdown — classic distribution candles. Candles [1]–[3] show very low volume (0.03–22 USD), indicating near-total illiquidity in the most recent hours.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 21%Sell 80%

Both short-term and medium-term trends are clearly bearish. The price has made consistent lower highs and lower lows across all 20 candles, declining from $0.00000593 to $0.00000307 — a ~48% drop. There is no evidence of a reversal pattern; the most recent candles show price stabilizing at depressed levels with minimal volume.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000028 (candle [3] open/close cluster, May 3 06:00 UTC)
Major$0.0000020 (psychological floor; below all observed candle lows)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000035 (candle [7]–[8] close zone, May 2 22:00–23:00 UTC)
Major$0.0000054–$0.0000059 (candle [18]–[20] peak distribution zone)

The most critical support is the $0.0000028 level where candles [2]–[3] clustered. A break below this opens the path to $0.0000020 or lower. Resistance at $0.0000035 aligns with the May 2 late-night consolidation. The $0.0000054–$0.0000059 zone represents the prior peak and would require a near-2x recovery to retest.

Notable patterns

  • Descending staircase of lower highs and lower lows across all 20 candles — confirmed downtrend
  • High-volume distribution candles at peak ([16] $954 USD, [18] $703 USD) followed by volume collapse — classic pump-and-dump distribution signature
  • Candle [8] (May 2, 22:00): wide-range bullish engulfing bar ($0.00000313–$0.00000345) with $400 volume — brief counter-trend bounce quickly faded
  • Candles [1]–[3] show near-zero volume ($0.03–$22 USD) — price discovery has essentially halted at current levels
  • Gap between candle [2] (07:00) and candle [1] (09:00) with no candle at 08:00 — zero trading activity in that hour

Total holders164
24h Δ-16
7d Δ+90
30d Δ+90
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth and price are positively correlated: the explosive holder growth from 16 to 223 (April 29–May 1) coincided with the price peak near $0.00000593. The subsequent holder decline (-54 on May 2, -26 in the most recent 24h) mirrors the price collapse. The acceleration of holder exits (-26 in 24h vs. -54 the prior day) suggests the decline is ongoing but may be moderating slightly.

The holder history reveals a striking pattern: the token sat dormant at exactly 16 holders from April 3 through April 28, 2026 — a full 26 days of zero activity. On April 29–30, holders surged from 16 to 78 (+62, +79%), then exploded to 223 on May 1 (+145, +65%). This was followed by a sharp reversal: -54 on May 2 (-32%) and a further -26 in the most recent 24h (-16%), bringing the total to 164. The 7d and 30d growth figures (+148, +90%) are technically positive but mask the rapid current deterioration. Growth is now clearly decelerating and reversing — the token is in a holder exodus phase consistent with post-pump distribution.

Top 10 hold90.22%
Top 100 hold99.99%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

ASapKNNwpv3c8PqEhE5eBb8bJZnqnBF4FLtESBZY4RuU

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address — matches the trading pair address listed in metadata)

71.20%

APUnpSv4HDpNPfed4dPqAnz75REWYbM5vTHaTnApLe1P

Individual whale / early holder

3.47%

9hqBffHAVqeaQP647CAeTCd1YtjBeUEgqB4aziHL4h2S

Individual whale / early holder

3.09%

5zqfRFBa7cvJexsJw8Rqz4gikNCFEy8UiC92NXh4Y6ZN

Individual whale / early holder

3.00%

B4HpqF8sHpU7iGKz3rQmV2oWccDwpuChB9AYTFT7AoQj

Individual whale / early holder

2.20%

Supply concentration is extreme. The #1 holder (ASapKNNwpv3c8PqEhE5eBb8bJZnqnBF4FLtESBZY4RuU, 71.20%) is the PumpSwap liquidity pool pair address — this is expected for a PumpSwap-launched token where the bonding curve/LP holds the majority of supply. Excluding the LP, the next 9 holders collectively control ~19% of supply, with the largest individual wallet at 3.47%. The top 100 wallets hold 99.99% of supply, leaving essentially nothing for the broader market. The distribution classification of 39 whales, 10 sharks, 42 dolphins, 17 fish, and 10 octopus suggests a fragmented but top-heavy holder base. Sentiment is distributing based on the -26 holder decline in 24h and dominant sell volume.

Liquidity$5,090
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$762.79
Sell$2,960
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers19
Unique sellers83

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $5,090 on PumpSwap (pair ASapKNNwpv3c8PqEhE5eBb8bJZnqnBF4FLtESBZY4RuU) is insufficient to support any meaningful position size without severe slippage. The 24h sell volume of ~$2,960 against buy volume of only $762.79 represents a net outflow ratio of nearly 4:1. With 83 sellers vs. 19 buyers and 113 sell transactions vs. 34 buy transactions, the market is in clear distribution mode. The FDV of $4,330 (per trading analytics) vs. $3,072 (per metadata) discrepancy likely reflects price movement during data collection. Any sell order above ~$100–200 USD would likely move the price by 5–10%+ given the shallow liquidity pool.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,894,831.46
FDV$3,072.15

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a total supply of ~999.9 million (effectively 1 billion) with 6 decimals. The FDV is only ~$3,072 at current prices, making this an ultra-micro-cap. The update authority is TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM — this is NOT the standard burn address (11111111111111111111111111111111), meaning the metadata is not fully renounced. However, the token is marked as 'mutable: false', which limits metadata changes. Mint authority and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the data, so they are marked as unknown. The contract is unverified and has a minimal description ('.'). No airdrop distribution was used (0 airdrop acquisitions); all holders acquired via swap (162) or transfer (2). The tokenomics are otherwise unremarkable for a PumpSwap meme token — 1B supply, no vesting or allocation data provided.

Volatility
high

Price declined ~48% from peak to current in under 24 hours. The 24h change ranges from -36.6% to -45.4% depending on measurement window. With only $5.09K liquidity, single trades can move price by double-digit percentages.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $5,090 on a single PumpSwap pool. There are no secondary markets or CEX listings. Any position above ~$200 faces severe slippage. Exit liquidity is critically limited.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 90.22% of supply; top 100 control 99.99%. Excluding the LP pool (71.20%), the next largest holder controls 3.47%. A coordinated exit by even 2–3 top holders could collapse the price entirely.

SniperDump
medium

20 snipers identified in the first 1,000 blocks. Of these, 9 show positive PnL and several still hold unknown balances. Sniper #9 already extracted $7,901 at +75.7% PnL. Remaining profitable snipers (e.g., #17 at +55.2% with $0 sold, #6 at +21.4%) represent latent dump risk. However, many snipers have already exited, reducing but not eliminating this risk.

Authority
medium

Update authority (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM) is not the burn address, meaning metadata could potentially be updated. However, 'mutable: false' flag limits this risk. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown, which introduces uncertainty.

Key risks

  • Ultra-thin liquidity ($5.09K) makes exit nearly impossible for any position above $200 without significant slippage
  • Top 10 holders control 90.22% of supply — extreme dump risk from whale exits
  • Token was dormant for 26 days before sudden activity — suggests pre-planned or coordinated launch
  • Sniper #9 extracted $7,901 (largest single exit) at +75.7% PnL, likely a major contributor to the price decline
  • Holder count declining rapidly: -26 in 24h, -54 the prior day — accelerating exodus
  • Unverified contract with minimal description ('.') and no meaningful project documentation
  • Update authority not renounced; mint/freeze authority status unknown
  • 24h sell volume ($2,960) is 3.9x buy volume ($762.79) — sustained selling pressure

Mitigating factors

  • Token is not flagged as spam by the data provider
  • Mutable: false flag limits metadata manipulation risk
  • Token has social links (Twitter, Moralis) suggesting some community presence
  • Some snipers remain in profit without having sold, suggesting not all early buyers are rushing to exit
  • The 1h price uptick of +7.78% shows residual buying interest exists
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, conservative portfolios, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana micro-cap meme token dynamics. Maximum position size should be limited to amounts one is fully prepared to lose entirely.

SCRIBBLIFy is a ultra-micro-cap Solana meme token that experienced a brief pump-and-dump cycle, rising from dormancy to a peak FDV of ~$5–6K before collapsing ~48% in under 24 hours. The token exhibits nearly every hallmark of a high-risk speculative micro-cap: extreme supply concentration, razor-thin liquidity, rapid holder exodus, dominant sell pressure, and a dormant pre-launch period suggesting coordinated deployment. The investment thesis is almost entirely speculative, with no fundamental value proposition evident from the available data.

Bull case (low)

A viral social media moment or coordinated community effort drives a new wave of buyers into the token, pushing the FDV back toward the $6–10K range (a 2–3x from current levels). The remaining profitable snipers hold their positions, and new retail buyers absorb the sell pressure.

  • Viral Twitter/social media campaign leveraging the token's existing social links
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifting all micro-caps
  • Coordinated accumulation by one or more of the top non-LP whale holders
  • New DEX aggregator listing increasing discoverability

Base case

The token stabilizes at current depressed price levels ($0.0000025–$0.0000035) with minimal trading activity, retaining a small community of 100–150 holders. It neither recovers to prior highs nor collapses to zero, instead becoming a low-activity token with occasional small pumps and dumps.

  • Sell pressure moderates as the most motivated sellers have already exited
  • A small core of holders (the 39 'whales' and 42 'dolphins' in the distribution) maintain positions
  • Liquidity remains above $2–3K, enabling minimal trading
  • No major new catalyst emerges in either direction

Bear case (high)

Continued holder exodus and sell pressure drain the remaining liquidity, pushing the price toward zero. Remaining profitable snipers exit their positions, the LP becomes too thin to support trading, and the token becomes effectively illiquid and abandoned.

  • Accelerating holder decline (-26 in 24h, -54 the prior day) continues
  • Remaining profitable snipers (e.g., #17 at +55.2%, #6 at +21.4%) exit their positions
  • No new catalysts emerge to attract fresh capital
  • Liquidity pool drains below viable trading threshold (<$1K)
  • Token follows the typical PumpSwap micro-cap lifecycle of pump → dump → abandonment

GeneratedMay 3, 09:50 AM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately May 3, 2026, 09:00 UTC. Most recent price candle is from 09:00 UTC May 3. Holder metrics reflect a snapshot near that time.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, update authority, mutability)
  • PumpSwap DEX price and liquidity data (pair ASapKNNwpv3c8PqEhE5eBb8bJZnqnBF4FLtESBZY4RuU)
  • Hourly OHLCV candle data (20 candles, May 2–3, 2026)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets, transaction counts)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data (total holders, acquisition method, concentration)
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • 30-day daily historical holder series
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers, realized PnL data)

Limitations

  • Sniper cost-basis and initial position sizes are entirely unknown ('sniped: unknown') — sniper concentration percent cannot be accurately computed
  • Mint authority and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided — rug risk from authorities is marked unknown
  • Only 20 hourly candles are available — insufficient for robust technical analysis across multiple timeframes
  • The token has an extremely short active trading history (~4 days), limiting the reliability of any trend analysis
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($3,072) and trading analytics ($4,330) suggests price volatility during data collection
  • No information on team identity, project roadmap, or utility — analysis is purely on-chain/quantitative
  • Holder classification (whale/shark/dolphin/fish/octopus) thresholds are not defined in the source data

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially ultra-micro-cap tokens like SCRIBBLIFy, carry extreme risk of total loss. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. The analyst has no position in this token.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,894,831.46

Key Risks

•Ultra-thin liquidity ($5.09K) makes exit nearly impossible for any position above $200 without significant slippage
•Top 10 holders control 90.22% of supply — extreme dump risk from whale exits
•Token was dormant for 26 days before sudden activity — suggests pre-planned or coordinated launch
•Sniper #9 extracted $7,901 (largest single exit) at +75.7% PnL, likely a major contributor to the price decline

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

Of the 20 identified snipers, 9 show positive realized PnL (ranging from +1.8% to +100.8%) and 7 show negative PnL (ranging from -8.9% to -76.5%), with 4 at or near breakeven/zero. The mixed PnL state suggests the token had a genuine price run that rewarded early buyers, but many latecomers are underwater. Sniper #9's $7,901 exit at +75.7% is the dominant smart-money event and likely contributed significantly to the price decline. Several snipers still hold unknown balances, representing latent sell pressure.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateMixed
Sell-through rateModerate
Profit-taking risk
high

Sniper cost-basis and initial position sizes are unknown (all 'sniped: unknown'). However, sell-side data shows sniper #9 (AgmLJBMDCqWynYnQiPCuj9ewsNNsBJXyzoUhD9LJzN51) sold $7,901 at +75.7% PnL — the largest realized exit. Sniper #15 sold $1,748 at +52.3% and sniper #16 sold $627 at +55.0%. These three snipers alone extracted ~$10,276 in sell proceeds.

Mixed-to-negative. While some early snipers captured significant profits (sniper #9: +75.7%, sniper #19: +100.8%, sniper #18: +85.2%), the majority of snipers by count are either at a loss or have exited entirely. The overall tone suggests the smart money that entered early has largely distributed, leaving retail holders exposed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Scribblification (SCRIBBLIFy)?

Price has fallen from a 20-candle high of ~$0.00000593 (candle [20]) to the current ~$0.00000307, a decline of ~48%. Sell pressure is overwhelming (79.5% of volume), holders are dropping (-26 in 24h), and liquidity is razor-thin at $5.09K. A brief 1h uptick of +7.78% is insufficient to reverse the dominant downtrend. Further downside toward the $0.0000025–$0.0000028 range is likely unless buy volume surges materially. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.0000020 to $0.0000038.

Is SCRIBBLIFy a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, conservative portfolios, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana micro-cap meme token dynamics. Maximum position size should be limited to amounts one is fully prepared to lose entirely.

How are SCRIBBLIFy holders trending?

Scribblification currently has 164 holders and is declining (24h: -16, 7d: 90, 30d: 90). The holder history reveals a striking pattern: the token sat dormant at exactly 16 holders from April 3 through April 28, 2026 — a full 26 days of zero activity. On April 29–30, holders surged from 16 to 78 (+62, +79%), then exploded to 223 on May 1 (+145, +65%). This was followed by a sharp reversal: -54 on May 2 (-32%) and a further -26 in the most recent 24h (-16%), bringing the total to 164. The 7d and 30d growth figures (+148, +90%) are technically positive but mask the rapid current deterioration. Growth is now clearly decelerating and reversing — the token is in a holder exodus phase consistent with post-pump distribution.

What does sniper activity look like for SCRIBBLIFy?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "mixed" and sell-through rate "moderate". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding SCRIBBLIFy?

Ultra-thin liquidity ($5.09K) makes exit nearly impossible for any position above $200 without significant slippage • Top 10 holders control 90.22% of supply — extreme dump risk from whale exits • Token was dormant for 26 days before sudden activity — suggests pre-planned or coordinated launch

← Back to all predictions

Track SCRIBBLIFy