SCRIBBLIFy

Scribblification Price Today & AI Analysis

SCRIBBLIFySolanaAnalysis as of May 3, 2026

Price

$0.052302

FDV $2,298

Contract

Live
EeqtMYkiHVwxMRjhmopPfmY9Rm7G3s8Le3UZ2JswBFXo

Chain

Solana

Holders

80

Market cap

$2,298

More tokens on Solana

DAIDAIDAI - The World Cup Token$0.053580+20.7%MC $3.6KAchiAchiAchi$0.052229+0.0%MC $2.2KDUMBDUMBDumb Money$0.051841+0.0%MC $1.8K$SAVEUS$SAVEUSBefore GTA, Saved America$0.051666+0.0%MC $1.7K$DHS$DHSDiamondHandsStatue$0.051497+0.0%MC $1.5KRAYRAYRaydium$1.99+8.6%MC $1.10B

Scribblification: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-03 09:50 UTC

Holder addresses

164

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$5,085.27
How concentrated is Scribblification ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 164 addresses (2026-05-03 09:50 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Scribblification?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Scribblification liquidity falling?
As of 2026-05-03 09:50 UTC, reported liquidity was $5,085.27. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-03 09:50 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about SCRIBBLIFy

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of May 3, 09:50 AM UTC

FDV

$3,072

Liquidity

$5,085.27

Holders

164

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Scribblification (SCRIBBLIFy) is a micro-cap Solana meme/novelty token launched on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of approximately $3,072–$4,330 USD. The token has experienced a sharp 24h price decline of ~36–45% from recent highs near $0.00000593, with extremely thin liquidity ($5.09K total), heavy sell pressure (79.5% of 24h volume), and a highly concentrated holder base (top 10 hold 90.22% of supply). The token is very early-stage, having only broken out of a dormant 16-holder base on April 29–30, 2026, and is now shedding holders rapidly (-26 in 24h). Overall risk is very high.

Key points

  • Extreme supply concentration: top 10 wallets hold 90.22%, with the #1 holder (likely the DEX liquidity pool ASapKNNwpv3c8PqEhE5eBb8bJZnqnBF4FLtESBZY4RuU) holding 71.20% of supply
  • Token was dormant at 16 holders for ~26 days before a sudden burst of activity on April 29–30, 2026
  • Sniper cohort is mixed: 9 of 20 snipers show positive realized PnL (up to +100.8%), while 7 show losses, indicating partial but not complete exit by early buyers
  • Fully diluted valuation is only ~$3,072–$4,330 USD, making this an ultra-micro-cap with extreme volatility risk
  • Sell pressure dominates: 79.5% of 24h volume is sells, with 83 sellers vs. 19 buyers

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24–72 hours

bearish

Price has fallen from a 20-candle high of ~$0.00000593 (candle [20]) to the current ~$0.00000307, a decline of ~48%. Sell pressure is overwhelming (79.5% of volume), holders are dropping (-26 in 24h), and liquidity is razor-thin at $5.09K. A brief 1h uptick of +7.78% is insufficient to reverse the dominant downtrend. Further downside toward the $0.0000025–$0.0000028 range is likely unless buy volume surges materially.

Target low

$0.0000020

Target high

$0.0000038

Support

$0.0000028 (candle [3] open/close cluster), $0.0000025 (psychological round level below recent lows), $0.0000020 (extreme bear case / near-zero liquidity floor)

Resistance

$0.0000035 (candle [7]–[8] close cluster), $0.0000044–$0.0000047 (candle [12]–[14] consolidation zone), $0.0000054–$0.0000059 (candle [18]–[20] peak zone / all-time high area)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Without a significant catalyst — new exchange listing, viral social media moment, or coordinated buy campaign — the token is likely to continue declining or become illiquid. The holder base is contracting rapidly, smart money snipers have largely taken profits, and the FDV is already sub-$5K. Recovery to prior highs would require a 2x+ move against a backdrop of deteriorating fundamentals.

Catalysts

  • Viral social media campaign on Twitter (token has Twitter link)
  • New DEX listing or aggregator feature increasing visibility
  • Coordinated whale accumulation from one of the top non-LP holders
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifting all micro-caps

Bullish factors

  • Brief 1h price recovery of +7.78% suggests some residual buying interest
  • 7 of 20 snipers still hold positions (not fully exited), limiting immediate dump pressure from that cohort
  • Token is not flagged as spam and has social links (Twitter, Moralis)
  • 30d holder growth of +148 (from 16 to 164) shows the token attracted real interest

Bearish factors

  • 24h price decline of -36.6% to -45.4% (depending on measurement window)
  • 79.5% of 24h volume is sell-side; 83 sellers vs. only 19 buyers
  • Holders dropped -26 (-16%) in 24h, accelerating the exit trend
  • Total liquidity only $5.09K — any meaningful sell order causes severe slippage
  • Top 10 holders control 90.22% of supply, creating extreme dump risk
  • FDV of ~$3,072–$4,330 leaves little room for price appreciation without new capital
  • Sniper #9 (AgmLJBMDCqWynYnQiPCuj9ewsNNsBJXyzoUhD9LJzN51) sold $7,901 at +75.7% PnL — already extracted significant value
  • Token was dormant for 26 days before launch activity, suggesting pre-planned deployment

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the ultra-micro-cap nature of this token ($3–4K FDV), extremely thin liquidity ($5.09K), missing sniper cost-basis data (all 'sniped: unknown'), and the token's very short trading history (active only since ~April 29, 2026). Price action at this scale is highly susceptible to single-wallet manipulation.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
EeqtMY...BFXo
Total Supply
999,894,831.46

Key Risks

  • Ultra-thin liquidity ($5.09K) makes exit nearly impossible for any position above $200 without significant slippage
  • Top 10 holders control 90.22% of supply — extreme dump risk from whale exits
  • Token was dormant for 26 days before sudden activity — suggests pre-planned or coordinated launch
  • Sniper #9 extracted $7,901 (largest single exit) at +75.7% PnL, likely a major contributor to the price decline

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 20 available hourly candles (May 2–3, 2026) show a clear peak-and-decline structure. The token reached its highest point in candle [20] (May 2, 10:00 UTC) with a high of $0.00000593, followed by a sustained series of lower highs and lower lows through candle [1] (May 3, 09:00 UTC) at $0.00000307. Candles [16] and [18] show the highest volume (954 and 703 USD respectively) and wide-range bars coinciding with the price peak and initial breakdown — classic distribution candles. Candles [1]–[3] show very low volume (0.03–22 USD), indicating near-total illiquidity in the most recent hours.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Both short-term and medium-term trends are clearly bearish. The price has made consistent lower highs and lower lows across all 20 candles, declining from $0.00000593 to $0.00000307 — a ~48% drop. There is no evidence of a reversal pattern; the most recent candles show price stabilizing at depressed levels with minimal volume.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

21%

Sell

80%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000028 (candle [3] open/close cluster, May 3 06:00 UTC)

Major support

$0.0000020 (psychological floor; below all observed candle lows)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000035 (candle [7]–[8] close zone, May 2 22:00–23:00 UTC)

Major resistance

$0.0000054–$0.0000059 (candle [18]–[20] peak distribution zone)

The most critical support is the $0.0000028 level where candles [2]–[3] clustered. A break below this opens the path to $0.0000020 or lower. Resistance at $0.0000035 aligns with the May 2 late-night consolidation. The $0.0000054–$0.0000059 zone represents the prior peak and would require a near-2x recovery to retest.

Notable patterns

  • Descending staircase of lower highs and lower lows across all 20 candles — confirmed downtrend
  • High-volume distribution candles at peak ([16] $954 USD, [18] $703 USD) followed by volume collapse — classic pump-and-dump distribution signature
  • Candle [8] (May 2, 22:00): wide-range bullish engulfing bar ($0.00000313–$0.00000345) with $400 volume — brief counter-trend bounce quickly faded
  • Candles [1]–[3] show near-zero volume ($0.03–$22 USD) — price discovery has essentially halted at current levels
  • Gap between candle [2] (07:00) and candle [1] (09:00) with no candle at 08:00 — zero trading activity in that hour

Liquidity

Liquidity

$5,085.27

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $5,090 on PumpSwap (pair ASapKNNwpv3c8PqEhE5eBb8bJZnqnBF4FLtESBZY4RuU) is insufficient to support any meaningful position size without severe slippage. The 24h sell volume of ~$2,960 against buy volume of only $762.79 represents a net outflow ratio of nearly 4:1. With 83 sellers vs. 19 buyers and 113 sell transactions vs. 34 buy transactions, the market is in clear distribution mode. The FDV of $4,330 (per trading analytics) vs. $3,072 (per metadata) discrepancy likely reflects price movement during data collection. Any sell order above ~$100–200 USD would likely move the price by 5–10%+ given the shallow liquidity pool.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,894,831.46

FDV

$3,072.15

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price declined ~48% from peak to current in under 24 hours. The 24h change ranges from -36.6% to -45.4% depending on measurement window. With only $5.09K liquidity, single trades can move price by double-digit percentages.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $5,090 on a single PumpSwap pool. There are no secondary markets or CEX listings. Any position above ~$200 faces severe slippage. Exit liquidity is critically limited.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Ultra-thin liquidity ($5.09K) makes exit nearly impossible for any position above $200 without significant slippage
  • Top 10 holders control 90.22% of supply — extreme dump risk from whale exits
  • Token was dormant for 26 days before sudden activity — suggests pre-planned or coordinated launch
  • Sniper #9 extracted $7,901 (largest single exit) at +75.7% PnL, likely a major contributor to the price decline
  • Holder count declining rapidly: -26 in 24h, -54 the prior day — accelerating exodus
  • Unverified contract with minimal description ('.') and no meaningful project documentation
  • Update authority not renounced; mint/freeze authority status unknown
  • 24h sell volume ($2,960) is 3.9x buy volume ($762.79) — sustained selling pressure

Mitigating factors

  • Token is not flagged as spam by the data provider
  • Mutable: false flag limits metadata manipulation risk
  • Token has social links (Twitter, Moralis) suggesting some community presence
  • Some snipers remain in profit without having sold, suggesting not all early buyers are rushing to exit
  • The 1h price uptick of +7.78% shows residual buying interest exists

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, conservative portfolios, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana micro-cap meme token dynamics. Maximum position size should be limited to amounts one is fully prepared to lose entirely.

SCRIBBLIFy is a ultra-micro-cap Solana meme token that experienced a brief pump-and-dump cycle, rising from dormancy to a peak FDV of ~$5–6K before collapsing ~48% in under 24 hours. The token exhibits nearly every hallmark of a high-risk speculative micro-cap: extreme supply concentration, razor-thin liquidity, rapid holder exodus, dominant sell pressure, and a dormant pre-launch period suggesting coordinated deployment. The investment thesis is almost entirely speculative, with no fundamental value proposition evident from the available data.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A viral social media moment or coordinated community effort drives a new wave of buyers into the token, pushing the FDV back toward the $6–10K range (a 2–3x from current levels). The remaining profitable snipers hold their positions, and new retail buyers absorb the sell pressure.

  • Viral Twitter/social media campaign leveraging the token's existing social links
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifting all micro-caps
  • Coordinated accumulation by one or more of the top non-LP whale holders
  • New DEX aggregator listing increasing discoverability

Base Case

The token stabilizes at current depressed price levels ($0.0000025–$0.0000035) with minimal trading activity, retaining a small community of 100–150 holders. It neither recovers to prior highs nor collapses to zero, instead becoming a low-activity token with occasional small pumps and dumps.

  • Sell pressure moderates as the most motivated sellers have already exited
  • A small core of holders (the 39 'whales' and 42 'dolphins' in the distribution) maintain positions
  • Liquidity remains above $2–3K, enabling minimal trading
  • No major new catalyst emerges in either direction

Bear Case

High probability

Continued holder exodus and sell pressure drain the remaining liquidity, pushing the price toward zero. Remaining profitable snipers exit their positions, the LP becomes too thin to support trading, and the token becomes effectively illiquid and abandoned.

  • Accelerating holder decline (-26 in 24h, -54 the prior day) continues
  • Remaining profitable snipers (e.g., #17 at +55.2%, #6 at +21.4%) exit their positions
  • No new catalysts emerge to attract fresh capital
  • Liquidity pool drains below viable trading threshold (<$1K)
  • Token follows the typical PumpSwap micro-cap lifecycle of pump → dump → abandonment

Analysis details

Generated

May 3, 09:50 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-03 09:50 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, update authority, mutability)
  • PumpSwap DEX price and liquidity data (pair ASapKNNwpv3c8PqEhE5eBb8bJZnqnBF4FLtESBZY4RuU)
  • Hourly OHLCV candle data (20 candles, May 2–3, 2026)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets, transaction counts)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data (total holders, acquisition method, concentration)
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • 30-day daily historical holder series
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers, realized PnL data)

Limitations

  • Sniper cost-basis and initial position sizes are entirely unknown ('sniped: unknown') — sniper concentration percent cannot be accurately computed
  • Mint authority and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided — rug risk from authorities is marked unknown
  • Only 20 hourly candles are available — insufficient for robust technical analysis across multiple timeframes
  • The token has an extremely short active trading history (~4 days), limiting the reliability of any trend analysis
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($3,072) and trading analytics ($4,330) suggests price volatility during data collection
  • No information on team identity, project roadmap, or utility — analysis is purely on-chain/quantitative
  • Holder classification (whale/shark/dolphin/fish/octopus) thresholds are not defined in the source data

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially ultra-micro-cap tokens like SCRIBBLIFy, carry extreme risk of total loss. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. The analyst has no position in this token.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Scribblification ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 164 addresses (2026-05-03 09:50 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Scribblification?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Scribblification liquidity falling?

As of 2026-05-03 09:50 UTC, reported liquidity was $5,085.27. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Scribblification (SCRIBBLIFy)?

Price has fallen from a 20-candle high of ~$0.00000593 (candle [20]) to the current ~$0.00000307, a decline of ~48%. Sell pressure is overwhelming (79.5% of volume), holders are dropping (-26 in 24h), and liquidity is razor-thin at $5.09K. A brief 1h uptick of +7.78% is insufficient to reverse the dominant downtrend. Further downside toward the $0.0000025–$0.0000028 range is likely unless buy volume surges materially. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.0000020 to $0.0000038.

Is SCRIBBLIFy a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, conservative portfolios, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana micro-cap meme token dynamics. Maximum position size should be limited to amounts one is fully prepared to lose entirely.

What are the key risks of holding SCRIBBLIFy?

Ultra-thin liquidity ($5.09K) makes exit nearly impossible for any position above $200 without significant slippage • Top 10 holders control 90.22% of supply — extreme dump risk from whale exits • Token was dormant for 26 days before sudden activity — suggests pre-planned or coordinated launch

← Back to all predictions

Track SCRIBBLIFy