GMC

Grand Meme Coin Price Today & AI Analysis

GMCSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 18, 2026

Price

$0.052234

FDV $2,233

Contract

Live
EZGf9XNqTbAVgFH4F6Q8ua4Yk9vG3ExKFR7gKVZ5pump

Chain

Holders

91

Market cap

$2,233

More tokens on Solana

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about GMC

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Jun 18, 08:17 PM UTC

FDV

$190,495

Liquidity

$52,392

Holders

1,271

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Grand Meme Coin (GMC) is an unverified Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap (mint: EZGf9XNqTbAVgFH4F6Q8ua4Yk9vG3ExKFR7gKVZ5pump). The token currently trades at ~$0.000190 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$190K–$273K (discrepancy between metadata and analytics sources). It experienced a dramatic 104% 24h price surge but has since retraced ~45% in the last hour. The token sat dormant at 91 holders for the entire 30-day historical window before an explosive single-day jump to 1,271 holders (+1,180, +93%), which is a highly anomalous pattern. Liquidity is extremely shallow at $52.39K, top holder data is unavailable, sniper data is unavailable, and the contract is unverified. These combined signals indicate a very high-risk speculative asset.

Key points

  • Explosive single-day holder surge from 91 to 1,271 (+1,180) after 30 days of complete stagnation — highly anomalous
  • 104% 24h price pump followed by immediate ~45% hourly retracement — classic pump-and-dump pattern
  • Extremely shallow liquidity of only $52.39K against ~$2.1M in 24h combined volume — severe slippage risk
  • No verified contract, no social links, no description, unknown update authority — minimal transparency
  • Top holder distribution data entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token pumped 104% over 24h but has already retraced ~45.6% in the most recent hour. With only $52.39K in liquidity, 7,365 sell transactions vs 5,918 buy transactions, and more unique sellers (2,341) than buyers (3,035 buyers but higher sell count), the short-term momentum is clearly turning bearish. The price is likely to continue declining toward prior support levels unless new buying catalysts emerge.

Target low

$0.000014

Target high

$0.000094

Support

$0.000014 (candle low / launch-level support), $0.000072 (recent intraday low from candle 4)

Resistance

$0.000094 (repeated OHLC high across multiple candles), $0.000097 (candle 5 high)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Given the token's 30-day dormancy followed by a single-day speculative spike, the medium-term outlook is bearish. Without verified fundamentals, social presence, or meaningful liquidity, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. The holder surge may represent bot activity or coordinated promotion rather than organic adoption.

Catalysts

  • Any new social media campaign or influencer promotion (upside risk)
  • Liquidity withdrawal by early holders (downside risk)
  • Broader Solana meme coin market sentiment shift
  • Failure to maintain holder count above 1,000 would signal rapid unwinding

Bullish factors

  • 104% 24h price gain demonstrates speculative momentum exists
  • 1,180 new holders in a single day shows rapid awareness spread
  • Nearly balanced buy/sell volume (49.5% vs 50.5%) suggests not a one-sided dump yet
  • 3,035 unique buyers in 24h indicates broad participation

Bearish factors

  • 45.6% price drop in the most recent hour signals momentum reversal
  • 30 days of complete stagnation at 91 holders before the spike is deeply suspicious
  • Liquidity of only $52.39K is dangerously thin for $2.1M in 24h volume
  • More sell transactions (7,365) than buy transactions (5,918) in 24h
  • No verified contract, no description, no social links — zero fundamental backing
  • Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk unknown
  • OHLC data shows erratic price oscillation between $0.000014 and $0.000284 — extreme volatility

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) missing top holder data preventing concentration analysis, (2) no sniper data, (3) unknown update authority, (4) extremely thin liquidity making price highly manipulable, and (5) anomalous holder growth pattern that may not reflect genuine organic demand.

GMC call history

Full track record →

Jun 18bearish
24h-99.1%
7d-99.2%
30d-99.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
EZGf9X...pump
Total Supply
999,999,956.88

Key Risks

  • Complete data opacity: no top holders, no sniper data, unknown authority status, unverified contract
  • Anomalous holder growth pattern (91 flat for 30 days → +1,180 in 24h) strongly suggests coordinated/artificial activity
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($52.39K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk
  • Post-pump volume collapse (97% drop in one hour) signals momentum exhaustion and potential dump

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidenceLow risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be assessed from sniper activity. The anomalous holder pattern (91 holders for 30 days, then +1,180 in one day) could indicate coordinated bot activity or a promotional push rather than organic smart money accumulation. The near-equal buy/sell volume split and higher sell transaction count (7,365 sells vs 5,918 buys) suggests early participants may already be distributing.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration
0.00%
PnL state
Unknown
Sell-through rate
Unknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results

Unknown — no sniper data available. The 30-day dormancy period followed by a sudden holder explosion suggests early holders (the original 91) may have been waiting for a coordinated pump event. Their current PnL state cannot be determined from available data.

Deep Analysis

The 5 most recent hourly candles (16:00–20:00 UTC on 2026-06-18) reveal extreme intraday volatility and an unusual OHLC structure. Notably, in several candles the Low value is numerically HIGHER than the High value as reported (e.g., candle 1: H=0.0000935, L=0.0002045), which suggests the data feed may have H/L fields inverted or the price action is extremely erratic. Treating the larger value as the true high and smaller as the true low: candle highs range from ~$0.0000967 to ~$0.000284, while candle lows cluster around $0.0000143–$0.0000719. Volume spiked dramatically in candles 2–4 (~$675K–$705K per hour) versus candles 1 and 5 (~$21K–$22K), indicating the pump occurred in the middle hours and is now fading. The most recent candle (20:00) shows a sharp volume collapse to $22K, consistent with post-pump exhaustion.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is clearly bearish following the pump peak. The 1h price change of -45.6% with collapsing volume in the most recent candle confirms a downtrend is underway. Medium-term is effectively sideways/unknown given the token was dormant for 30 days prior to this event.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

51%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000072 (candle 4 low)

Major support

$0.000014 (recurring candle open/low — apparent floor/launch price)

Immediate resistance

$0.000094 (repeated candle high across candles 1–3)

Major resistance

$0.000284 (candle 3 high — the pump peak)

The $0.000014 level appears as a recurring open/low across multiple candles and likely represents the pre-pump baseline price. The $0.000094 level has acted as a repeated ceiling/pivot. The $0.000284 level represents the absolute pump peak and is unlikely to be revisited without fresh catalysts. Current price of $0.000190 sits between the $0.000094 resistance and $0.000284 peak, in a zone with no clear support.

Notable patterns

  • Post-pump volume exhaustion: 97% volume collapse from peak ($705K) to most recent candle ($22K)
  • Repeated price oscillation between $0.000014 and $0.000094 across multiple candles suggests a ping-pong pattern between two price levels
  • Potential inverted H/L data in OHLC feed — data quality concern
  • Classic pump-and-dump candle structure: low volume base → explosive volume spike → immediate volume collapse
  • No higher highs pattern — price failed to sustain above $0.000094 in most candles

Holder growth

Total holders

1,271

24h Δ

+1180

7d Δ

+1180

30d Δ

+1180

Accelerating Growth

Yes

Correlation with price

The holder surge is perfectly correlated with the 104% price pump — both occurred simultaneously in the last 24 hours after 30 days of complete stagnation. This simultaneous spike in both price and holders is a hallmark of coordinated promotion or bot-driven activity rather than organic growth. The -200 holder drop in the last hour (-16%) mirrors the -45.6% price retracement, suggesting holders are exiting alongside the price decline.

The historical holder data shows an absolutely flat line at exactly 91 holders from 2026-05-19 through 2026-06-17 (30 consecutive days of zero change). Then in a single 24-hour window, holders jumped by +1,180 to 1,271 — a 93% increase. This is an extreme anomaly. Legitimate organic growth does not follow this pattern. The sudden spike after prolonged dormancy, combined with the simultaneous price pump, strongly suggests a coordinated event (bot swarms, airdrop campaign, or paid promotion). The -200 holder loss in just the last hour (-16%) as price retraces is also alarming and suggests many of these new 'holders' are transient speculators or bots already exiting.

Concentration

Top 10 hold

0.00%

Top 100 hold

0.00%

Sentiment

Mixed

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token — the API returned no top holders list. The supply concentration metrics show top10=0% and top100=0%, which is almost certainly a data artifact rather than a genuine reflection of distribution. Without holder data, concentration risk cannot be properly assessed. Given the token's very small liquidity ($52.39K), shallow market depth, and anomalous holder growth pattern, it is highly probable that supply is significantly concentrated among a small number of wallets. The 'Distribution' breakdown shows zeros across all categories (whales, sharks, dolphins, fish, octopus), further confirming data unavailability rather than genuine even distribution. This data gap is itself a risk signal.

Notable holders

  • Top holder data unavailable — no data returned by APIN/A0.00%

Liquidity

Liquidity

$52,390

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $52.39K on a single PumpSwap pair (DdwRAroxNH14eKcySatSEbpiymn5GVgWKcEWzFxZxAUR). With $2.12M in combined 24h volume against only $52.39K in liquidity, the volume-to-liquidity ratio is approximately 40:1 — an extreme imbalance indicating the pool is being heavily churned and any significant trade will cause massive slippage. The net flow is marginally negative (sell volume $1.07M vs buy volume $1.05M), confirming slight outflow pressure. While unique buyers (3,035) outnumber unique sellers (2,341), the total sell transaction count (7,365) far exceeds buy transactions (5,918), suggesting sellers are executing more frequently — consistent with distribution behavior. The FDV discrepancy between metadata ($190.5K) and analytics ($272.9K) may reflect price movement during data collection.

Flow (24h)

Buy volume

$1,050,000

Sell volume

$1,070,000

Net flow

Outflow

Unique buyers

3,035

Unique sellers

2,341

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,956.88

FDV

$190,494.61

Mint authority

Active

Freeze authority

Active

Total supply is approximately 1 billion tokens (999,999,956.88), a standard meme coin supply figure. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is unverified — this means mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The token is marked as 'Mutable: false' which is a mild positive signal (metadata cannot be changed), but without confirmed authority renouncement, the risk of mint or freeze actions remains unknown. No social links, no description, and no verified contract make this token essentially anonymous. The 'pump' suffix in the mint address (EZGf9XNqTbAVgFH4F6Q8ua4Yk9vG3ExKFR7gKVZ5pump) indicates it was launched via Pump.fun, which has a standard bonding curve mechanism — but graduation to PumpSwap does not guarantee safety. FDV of ~$190K–$273K is extremely small, making the token highly susceptible to price manipulation.

  • Volatilityhigh

    104% pump followed by 45.6% hourly retracement. OHLC candles show price oscillating between $0.000014 and $0.000284 — a 20x range within hours. Extreme volatility makes position sizing nearly impossible.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Only $52.39K in total liquidity against $2.12M in 24h volume (40:1 ratio). Any sell order of meaningful size will cause catastrophic slippage. Exit liquidity is severely limited.

  • Concentrationhigh

    Top holder data is entirely unavailable, making concentration risk unquantifiable. The 30-day dormancy at 91 holders followed by a sudden spike strongly implies the original 91 holders hold a dominant share of supply and may be distributing into the pump.

  • Sniper Dumphigh

    No sniper data available, but the pump-and-dump price pattern, post-pump volume collapse, and simultaneous holder/price spike are consistent with coordinated early-buyer distribution. The -200 holder loss in one hour as price retraces is a warning sign.

  • Authorityhigh

    Update authority is 'unknown', contract is unverified, mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. No social links or description. The token is essentially anonymous with no accountability mechanisms.

Key risks

  • Complete data opacity: no top holders, no sniper data, unknown authority status, unverified contract
  • Anomalous holder growth pattern (91 flat for 30 days → +1,180 in 24h) strongly suggests coordinated/artificial activity
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($52.39K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk
  • Post-pump volume collapse (97% drop in one hour) signals momentum exhaustion and potential dump
  • No social presence, no description, no community — zero fundamental value proposition
  • FDV of ~$190K makes this trivially easy to manipulate with small capital
  • Rapid holder loss already underway: -200 holders (-16%) in just the last hour

Mitigating factors

  • Token marked as 'Mutable: false' — metadata cannot be altered post-deployment
  • Launched via Pump.fun which has a standard, publicly auditable bonding curve mechanism
  • Nearly balanced buy/sell volume (49.5%/50.5%) suggests not a fully one-sided dump yet
  • 3,035 unique buyers in 24h shows some genuine market participation

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for complete capital loss. This is NOT financial advice.

GMC is a high-risk, anonymous meme token that exhibits multiple hallmarks of a coordinated pump-and-dump scheme: 30 days of dormancy followed by a single-day holder explosion, a 104% price spike with immediate reversal, critically shallow liquidity, and complete data opacity. There is no identifiable fundamental value proposition. The only viable thesis is pure short-term speculation, and even that carries extreme risk given the current post-pump positioning.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued speculative momentum drives a second wave of buying, pushing price back toward the $0.000284 pump peak or beyond. New social media attention or influencer promotion attracts fresh capital into the thin liquidity pool, amplifying price moves.

  • Fresh social media or influencer catalyst emerges
  • Broader Solana meme coin market enters a risk-on phase
  • Thin liquidity amplifies any new buying pressure significantly
  • Original 91 holders choose to hold rather than distribute

Base Case

Price continues to retrace from the pump peak, stabilizing somewhere between $0.000014 and $0.000094 as speculative interest fades. Holder count gradually declines from 1,271 back toward a lower equilibrium. The token persists as a low-activity, low-liquidity asset with occasional speculative spikes.

  • No new major catalysts emerge in the near term
  • Early holders gradually distribute over days rather than hours
  • A small core of speculative holders remains active
  • Liquidity pool is not fully withdrawn

Bear Case

High probability

The pump fully unwinds as early holders distribute into remaining buyers. Liquidity is withdrawn, holders drop back toward the pre-pump baseline of 91, and price collapses to the $0.000014 floor or lower. Token becomes effectively illiquid.

  • Post-pump volume exhaustion already evident (97% volume drop in one hour)
  • No fundamental value or community to sustain demand
  • Early holders (original 91) likely sitting on large unrealized gains and motivated to sell
  • -200 holder loss in last hour signals the unwind has already begun
  • No liquidity backstop — $52.39K pool can be drained quickly

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 18, 08:17 PM UTC

Data freshness

Data reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-06-18T20:00 UTC. Price and holder metrics may have changed since data collection.

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Solana mint account)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (pair: DdwRAroxNH14eKcySatSEbpiymn5GVgWKcEWzFxZxAUR)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (5 candles, 2026-06-18 16:00–20:00 UTC)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buyer/seller counts, price changes)
  • Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
  • Holder distribution metrics
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Top 20 holder data is entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • Sniper analysis endpoint returned no data — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
  • Update authority status is 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority renouncement cannot be confirmed
  • OHLC data shows potentially inverted H/L values in multiple candles — data quality concern
  • Only 5 hourly candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($190.5K) and analytics ($272.9K) suggests data was collected at different price points
  • Historical holder data only goes back 30 days and shows suspicious flat-line pattern that may indicate data gaps rather than true holder counts
  • No social links or project documentation available for qualitative assessment

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total capital loss. The analyst has no position in GMC. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Grand Meme Coin (GMC)?

The token pumped 104% over 24h but has already retraced ~45.6% in the most recent hour. With only $52.39K in liquidity, 7,365 sell transactions vs 5,918 buy transactions, and more unique sellers (2,341) than buyers (3,035 buyers but higher sell count), the short-term momentum is clearly turning bearish. The price is likely to continue declining toward prior support levels unless new buying catalysts emerge. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000014 to $0.000094.

Is GMC a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for complete capital loss. This is NOT financial advice.

How are GMC holders trending?

Grand Meme Coin currently has 1,271 holders and is growing (24h: 1180, 7d: 1180, 30d: 1180). The historical holder data shows an absolutely flat line at exactly 91 holders from 2026-05-19 through 2026-06-17 (30 consecutive days of zero change). Then in a single 24-hour window, holders jumped by +1,180 to 1,271 — a 93% increase. This is an extreme anomaly. Legitimate organic growth does not follow this pattern. The sudden spike after prolonged dormancy, combined with the simultaneous price pump, strongly suggests a coordinated event (bot swarms, airdrop campaign, or paid promotion). The -200 holder loss in just the last hour (-16%) as price retraces is also alarming and suggests many of these new 'holders' are transient speculators or bots already exiting.

What does sniper activity look like for GMC?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding GMC?

Complete data opacity: no top holders, no sniper data, unknown authority status, unverified contract • Anomalous holder growth pattern (91 flat for 30 days → +1,180 in 24h) strongly suggests coordinated/artificial activity • Critically shallow liquidity ($52.39K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk

← Back to all predictions

Track GMC