Grand Meme Coin Price Today & AI Analysis

GMCSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 18, 2026

$0.0₅2316

Contract

Live

EZGf9XNqTbAVgFH4F6Q8ua4Yk9vG3ExKFR7gKVZ5pump

Chain

Solana

Holders

Market cap

$2,315

At a $1M market cap, $GMC would be $0.001001 (432x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is GMC a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 2

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about GMC

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

BULLDUCbullstable coin$0.0₅2235+0.0%MC $2.2K

KekiusKekius Max$0.0₅4380-0.4%MC $4.4K

MOONMoonBank$0.0₅2309+0.0%MC $2.3K

WHALECUPThe World Whale Cup$0.0₅1987+0.0%MC $2.0K

BOLDCOINBoldCoin$0.0₅4603+0.0%MC $4.4K

uniuni$0.009229-64.9%MC $9.23M

Grand Meme Coin: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-18 20:17 UTC

Holder addresses

1,271

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$52,392.13

How concentrated is Grand Meme Coin ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,271 addresses (2026-06-18 20:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Grand Meme Coin?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Grand Meme Coin liquidity falling?: As of 2026-06-18 20:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $52,392.13. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-18 20:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 18, 08:17 PM UTC

FDV

$190,495

Liquidity

$52,392.13

Holders

1,271

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Grand Meme Coin (GMC) is an unverified Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap (mint: EZGf9XNqTbAVgFH4F6Q8ua4Yk9vG3ExKFR7gKVZ5pump). The token currently trades at ~$0.000190 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$190K–$273K (discrepancy between metadata and analytics sources). It experienced a dramatic 104% 24h price surge but has since retraced ~45% in the last hour. The token sat dormant at 91 holders for the entire 30-day historical window before an explosive single-day jump to 1,271 holders (+1,180, +93%), which is a highly anomalous pattern. Liquidity is extremely shallow at $52.39K, top holder data is unavailable, sniper data is unavailable, and the contract is unverified. These combined signals indicate a very high-risk speculative asset.

Key points

Explosive single-day holder surge from 91 to 1,271 (+1,180) after 30 days of complete stagnation — highly anomalous
104% 24h price pump followed by immediate ~45% hourly retracement — classic pump-and-dump pattern
Extremely shallow liquidity of only $52.39K against ~$2.1M in 24h combined volume — severe slippage risk
No verified contract, no social links, no description, unknown update authority — minimal transparency
Top holder distribution data entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token pumped 104% over 24h but has already retraced ~45.6% in the most recent hour. With only $52.39K in liquidity, 7,365 sell transactions vs 5,918 buy transactions, and more unique sellers (2,341) than buyers (3,035 buyers but higher sell count), the short-term momentum is clearly turning bearish. The price is likely to continue declining toward prior support levels unless new buying catalysts emerge.

Target low

$0.000014

Target high

$0.000094

Support: $0.000014 (candle low / launch-level support), $0.000072 (recent intraday low from candle 4)
Resistance: $0.000094 (repeated OHLC high across multiple candles), $0.000097 (candle 5 high)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Given the token's 30-day dormancy followed by a single-day speculative spike, the medium-term outlook is bearish. Without verified fundamentals, social presence, or meaningful liquidity, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. The holder surge may represent bot activity or coordinated promotion rather than organic adoption.

Catalysts

Any new social media campaign or influencer promotion (upside risk)
Liquidity withdrawal by early holders (downside risk)
Broader Solana meme coin market sentiment shift
Failure to maintain holder count above 1,000 would signal rapid unwinding

Bullish factors

104% 24h price gain demonstrates speculative momentum exists
1,180 new holders in a single day shows rapid awareness spread
Nearly balanced buy/sell volume (49.5% vs 50.5%) suggests not a one-sided dump yet
3,035 unique buyers in 24h indicates broad participation

Bearish factors

45.6% price drop in the most recent hour signals momentum reversal
30 days of complete stagnation at 91 holders before the spike is deeply suspicious
Liquidity of only $52.39K is dangerously thin for $2.1M in 24h volume
More sell transactions (7,365) than buy transactions (5,918) in 24h
No verified contract, no description, no social links — zero fundamental backing
Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk unknown
OHLC data shows erratic price oscillation between $0.000014 and $0.000284 — extreme volatility

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) missing top holder data preventing concentration analysis, (2) no sniper data, (3) unknown update authority, (4) extremely thin liquidity making price highly manipulable, and (5) anomalous holder growth pattern that may not reflect genuine organic demand.

GMC call history

Full track record →

Jun 18bearish@ $0.000190

24h-99.1%

7d-99.2%

30d-99.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: EZGf9X...pump
Total Supply: 999,999,956.88

Key Risks

Complete data opacity: no top holders, no sniper data, unknown authority status, unverified contract
Anomalous holder growth pattern (91 flat for 30 days → +1,180 in 24h) strongly suggests coordinated/artificial activity
Critically shallow liquidity ($52.39K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk
Post-pump volume collapse (97% drop in one hour) signals momentum exhaustion and potential dump

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 5 most recent hourly candles (16:00–20:00 UTC on 2026-06-18) reveal extreme intraday volatility and an unusual OHLC structure. Notably, in several candles the Low value is numerically HIGHER than the High value as reported (e.g., candle 1: H=0.0000935, L=0.0002045), which suggests the data feed may have H/L fields inverted or the price action is extremely erratic. Treating the larger value as the true high and smaller as the true low: candle highs range from ~$0.0000967 to ~$0.000284, while candle lows cluster around $0.0000143–$0.0000719. Volume spiked dramatically in candles 2–4 (~$675K–$705K per hour) versus candles 1 and 5 (~$21K–$22K), indicating the pump occurred in the middle hours and is now fading. The most recent candle (20:00) shows a sharp volume collapse to $22K, consistent with post-pump exhaustion.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is clearly bearish following the pump peak. The 1h price change of -45.6% with collapsing volume in the most recent candle confirms a downtrend is underway. Medium-term is effectively sideways/unknown given the token was dormant for 30 days prior to this event.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

51%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000072 (candle 4 low)

Major support

$0.000014 (recurring candle open/low — apparent floor/launch price)

Immediate resistance

$0.000094 (repeated candle high across candles 1–3)

Major resistance

$0.000284 (candle 3 high — the pump peak)

The $0.000014 level appears as a recurring open/low across multiple candles and likely represents the pre-pump baseline price. The $0.000094 level has acted as a repeated ceiling/pivot. The $0.000284 level represents the absolute pump peak and is unlikely to be revisited without fresh catalysts. Current price of $0.000190 sits between the $0.000094 resistance and $0.000284 peak, in a zone with no clear support.

Notable patterns

Post-pump volume exhaustion: 97% volume collapse from peak ($705K) to most recent candle ($22K)
Repeated price oscillation between $0.000014 and $0.000094 across multiple candles suggests a ping-pong pattern between two price levels
Potential inverted H/L data in OHLC feed — data quality concern
Classic pump-and-dump candle structure: low volume base → explosive volume spike → immediate volume collapse
No higher highs pattern — price failed to sustain above $0.000094 in most candles

Liquidity

$52,392.13

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $52.39K on a single PumpSwap pair (DdwRAroxNH14eKcySatSEbpiymn5GVgWKcEWzFxZxAUR). With $2.12M in combined 24h volume against only $52.39K in liquidity, the volume-to-liquidity ratio is approximately 40:1 — an extreme imbalance indicating the pool is being heavily churned and any significant trade will cause massive slippage. The net flow is marginally negative (sell volume $1.07M vs buy volume $1.05M), confirming slight outflow pressure. While unique buyers (3,035) outnumber unique sellers (2,341), the total sell transaction count (7,365) far exceeds buy transactions (5,918), suggesting sellers are executing more frequently — consistent with distribution behavior. The FDV discrepancy between metadata ($190.5K) and analytics ($272.9K) may reflect price movement during data collection.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,956.88

FDV

$190,494.61

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
104% pump followed by 45.6% hourly retracement. OHLC candles show price oscillating between $0.000014 and $0.000284 — a 20x range within hours. Extreme volatility makes position sizing nearly impossible.
Liquidityhigh
Only $52.39K in total liquidity against $2.12M in 24h volume (40:1 ratio). Any sell order of meaningful size will cause catastrophic slippage. Exit liquidity is severely limited.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Complete data opacity: no top holders, no sniper data, unknown authority status, unverified contract
Anomalous holder growth pattern (91 flat for 30 days → +1,180 in 24h) strongly suggests coordinated/artificial activity
Critically shallow liquidity ($52.39K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk
Post-pump volume collapse (97% drop in one hour) signals momentum exhaustion and potential dump
No social presence, no description, no community — zero fundamental value proposition
FDV of ~$190K makes this trivially easy to manipulate with small capital
Rapid holder loss already underway: -200 holders (-16%) in just the last hour

Mitigating factors

Token marked as 'Mutable: false' — metadata cannot be altered post-deployment
Launched via Pump.fun which has a standard, publicly auditable bonding curve mechanism
Nearly balanced buy/sell volume (49.5%/50.5%) suggests not a fully one-sided dump yet
3,035 unique buyers in 24h shows some genuine market participation

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for complete capital loss. This is NOT financial advice.

GMC is a high-risk, anonymous meme token that exhibits multiple hallmarks of a coordinated pump-and-dump scheme: 30 days of dormancy followed by a single-day holder explosion, a 104% price spike with immediate reversal, critically shallow liquidity, and complete data opacity. There is no identifiable fundamental value proposition. The only viable thesis is pure short-term speculation, and even that carries extreme risk given the current post-pump positioning.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued speculative momentum drives a second wave of buying, pushing price back toward the $0.000284 pump peak or beyond. New social media attention or influencer promotion attracts fresh capital into the thin liquidity pool, amplifying price moves.

Fresh social media or influencer catalyst emerges
Broader Solana meme coin market enters a risk-on phase
Thin liquidity amplifies any new buying pressure significantly
Original 91 holders choose to hold rather than distribute

Base Case

Price continues to retrace from the pump peak, stabilizing somewhere between $0.000014 and $0.000094 as speculative interest fades. Holder count gradually declines from 1,271 back toward a lower equilibrium. The token persists as a low-activity, low-liquidity asset with occasional speculative spikes.

No new major catalysts emerge in the near term
Early holders gradually distribute over days rather than hours
A small core of speculative holders remains active
Liquidity pool is not fully withdrawn

Bear Case

High probability

The pump fully unwinds as early holders distribute into remaining buyers. Liquidity is withdrawn, holders drop back toward the pre-pump baseline of 91, and price collapses to the $0.000014 floor or lower. Token becomes effectively illiquid.

Post-pump volume exhaustion already evident (97% volume drop in one hour)
No fundamental value or community to sustain demand
Early holders (original 91) likely sitting on large unrealized gains and motivated to sell
-200 holder loss in last hour signals the unwind has already begun
No liquidity backstop — $52.39K pool can be drained quickly

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 18, 08:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-18 20:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (Solana mint account)
PumpSwap DEX pair data (pair: DdwRAroxNH14eKcySatSEbpiymn5GVgWKcEWzFxZxAUR)
Hourly OHLC candle data (5 candles, 2026-06-18 16:00–20:00 UTC)
24h trading analytics (volume, buyer/seller counts, price changes)
Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
Holder distribution metrics
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Top 20 holder data is entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
Sniper analysis endpoint returned no data — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
Update authority status is 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority renouncement cannot be confirmed
OHLC data shows potentially inverted H/L values in multiple candles — data quality concern
Only 5 hourly candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
FDV discrepancy between metadata ($190.5K) and analytics ($272.9K) suggests data was collected at different price points
Historical holder data only goes back 30 days and shows suspicious flat-line pattern that may indicate data gaps rather than true holder counts
No social links or project documentation available for qualitative assessment

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total capital loss. The analyst has no position in GMC. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Grand Meme Coin (GMC) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 2, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Grand Meme Coin (GMC)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 2, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Grand Meme Coin ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,271 addresses (2026-06-18 20:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Grand Meme Coin?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Grand Meme Coin liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-18 20:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $52,392.13. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Grand Meme Coin (GMC)?

Is GMC a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for complete capital loss. This is NOT financial advice.

What are the key risks of holding GMC?

Complete data opacity: no top holders, no sniper data, unknown authority status, unverified contract • Anomalous holder growth pattern (91 flat for 30 days → +1,180 in 24h) strongly suggests coordinated/artificial activity • Critically shallow liquidity ($52.39K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk