puffercat Price Today & AI Analysis

puffercatSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 30, 2026

$0.0₅2720

-1.21% 24h

Contract

Live

EUGsb7SNoJ3CPoW1Hr7e2A3nGmMtBGGxge56uBR8pump

Chain

Solana

Holders

383

Market cap

$2,648

At a $1M market cap, $PUFFERCAT would be $0.001027 (378x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is puffercat a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 25

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

0.02%1 bundler, 6 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about puffercat

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

OGGIEThe OG Frog$0.0₅2628+0.6%MC $2.6K

PAYDAYPAYDAY$0.0₅3298+1.5%MC $3.1K

TUZKITUZKI$0.0₅3185+0.6%MC $3.2K

DarkAIDarkAI$0.0₅2060-0.5%MC $2.1K

BFRGBlue Frog$0.0₅3384+0.0%MC $3.3K

ZECZcash$1,296.48-0.6%MC $133.24M

puffercat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-30 17:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$46,159.91

How concentrated is puffercat ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling puffercat?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is puffercat liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-30 17:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $46,159.91. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-30 17:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 30, 05:16 PM UTC

FDV

$134,735

Liquidity

$46,159.91

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

puffercat (puffercat) is a Pump.fun-launched meme token on Solana (mint: EUGsb7SNoJ3CPoW1Hr7e2A3nGmMtBGGxge56uBR8pump) currently trading at ~$0.0001382 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$134–151K. The token has experienced an explosive 277% 24h price surge, but this is accompanied by severe red flags: holder data returns zero across all metrics and all 30 days of historical data, top-holder data is unavailable, and sniper data is absent. Trading analytics show heavily skewed sell pressure (71.1% sell vs 28.9% buy) with sell volume ($497K) nearly 2.5× buy volume ($202K). Liquidity is extremely shallow at $46K. The combination of missing holder data, extreme sell dominance, and a pump-and-dump price pattern makes this a very high-risk token.

Key points

Explosive 277% 24h price pump on very low liquidity ($46K)
Severe sell-side dominance: 71.1% sell pressure, 8,524 sells vs 3,569 buys in 24h
Holder data entirely unavailable (0 holders reported across all timeframes — data gap or indexing failure)
Pump.fun origin with PumpSwap pair — typical meme/speculative launch profile
No social links, no verified contract, no description — minimal project transparency

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token pumped ~277% in 24h, reaching an intra-hour high of $0.000207 before pulling back to ~$0.000138. The most recent candle (hour 1) shows a significant wick from $0.000207 down to $0.000086, closing at $0.000157 — a classic shooting-star/bearish reversal signal. With sell volume nearly 2.5× buy volume and 2,261 sellers vs 627 buyers, short-term price action is likely to continue downward toward the $0.000086–$0.000031 support zone.

Target low

$0.000031

Target high

$0.000207

Support: $0.000086 (hourly candle 1 low), $0.000031 (hourly candle 2 low), $0.000029 (hourly candle 3 low)
Resistance: $0.000174 (hourly candle 2 close / candle 1 open zone), $0.000207 (hourly candle 1 & 2 highs — double top)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

Without a growing holder base, meaningful liquidity, or community/social presence, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. The token exhibits a classic pump-and-dump profile. Unless new catalysts emerge (listings, community growth, liquidity injection), the medium-term trajectory is continued decline toward near-zero.

Catalysts

Unexpected viral social media attention
Listing on a centralized exchange (very unlikely at this market cap)
Liquidity pool deepening by a major holder
Broader Solana meme-coin market rally

Bullish factors

277% 24h price surge demonstrates speculative demand exists
5m price change of +41.5% and 1h change of +72.6% show very recent momentum
$201K in buy volume over 24h indicates some buyer participation
PumpSwap listing provides basic DEX accessibility

Bearish factors

Sell volume ($497K) is 2.47× buy volume ($202K) — heavy distribution
8,524 sells vs 3,569 buys — sellers outnumber buyers 2.4:1
Liquidity only $46K — extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position
Zero holder data reported — possible data anomaly or very early/thin token
No social links, no description, unverified contract
Shooting-star candle pattern on hourly chart signals reversal
Pump.fun token with no stated utility or roadmap

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) complete absence of holder data making demand-side analysis impossible, (2) only 3 hourly candles available for technical analysis, (3) extreme volatility typical of micro-cap meme tokens makes price targets highly unreliable, and (4) missing sniper/whale data removes key on-chain signals.

puffercat call history

Full track record →

Jul 30bearish@ $0.000138

24h-95.3%

7d-98.0%

30d-97.4%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: EUGsb7...pump
Total Supply: 974,836,793.754349

Key Risks

Complete absence of holder data — cannot assess distribution or insider risk
Extreme sell-side dominance (71.1% sell pressure, 3.6:1 seller-to-buyer ratio)
Critically shallow liquidity ($46K) relative to trading volume ($698K/24h)
Classic pump-and-dump price pattern with shooting-star reversal candle

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 3 (15:00 UTC): narrow-range candle, O:$0.0000308, H:$0.0000400, L:$0.0000294, C:$0.0000358 — small bullish body, low volume ($19K), consolidation phase. Candle 2 (16:00 UTC): explosive breakout candle, O:$0.0000357, H:$0.0002036, L:$0.0000312, C:$0.0001736 — massive upper wick relative to body, volume surged to $508K, classic pump candle with long upper shadow suggesting distribution at highs. Candle 3 (17:00 UTC): O:$0.0001779, H:$0.0002067, L:$0.0000864, C:$0.0001574 — bearish candle, price failed to hold above open, large lower wick, volume declining to $106K. Pattern: shooting star / bearish engulfing setup forming at the top of a rapid pump.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

The token is in a very short-term pump phase that appears to be rolling over. The most recent candle closed below its open with a large lower wick, and volume is declining sharply from the peak $508K candle. The medium-term trend is bearish given the sell-side dominance and lack of holder base.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

29%

Sell

71%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000086 (candle 1 low / intra-hour wick low)

Major support

$0.000029–$0.000031 (candle 2 & 3 lows — pre-pump base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000174–$0.000178 (candle 1 open / candle 2 close zone)

Major resistance

$0.000204–$0.000207 (double top — candle 1 & 2 highs)

The $0.000086 level is the first meaningful support, representing the intra-hour wick low of the most recent candle. A break below this would likely see a retest of the pre-pump base at $0.000029–$0.000031. On the upside, the $0.000204–$0.000207 zone acted as a double top across two consecutive candles and represents strong resistance.

Notable patterns

Shooting star / bearish reversal candle at hourly high (candle 1, 17:00 UTC)
Double top formation at $0.000204–$0.000207 across candles 1 and 2
Volume climax on pump candle (candle 2) followed by sharp volume decline — exhaustion signal
Large upper wicks on both candles 1 and 2 indicating sustained selling pressure at highs
Pre-pump base consolidation visible in candle 3 (15:00 UTC) before explosive breakout

Liquidity

$46,159.91

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $46.16K against a FDV of ~$134–151K — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of roughly 30%, which is low for a meme token. Any trade above a few hundred dollars will experience significant slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: sell volume ($497K) is 2.47× buy volume ($202K), and sellers (2,261) outnumber buyers (627) by 3.6:1. Total 24h volume of ~$698K is approximately 15× the available liquidity, indicating extremely high turnover relative to pool depth. The pair trades on PumpSwap (BiCeKb3mEmzDNqk1zwjrDq4dJzX1ruUzVSLxXGvttgSC). Market health is poor: the token is being actively distributed into thin liquidity, creating high slippage and crash risk for any remaining holders.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

974,836,793.754349

FDV

$134,735 (metadata) / $151,470 (analytics)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
277% price surge in 24h followed by a shooting-star reversal candle. 5m change of +41.5% and 1h change of +72.6% indicate extreme short-term volatility. The token can lose the majority of its value rapidly.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $46.16K against $698K in 24h trading volume. Liquidity-to-volume ratio is ~6.6%, meaning the pool is being churned at an unsustainable rate. Large exits will face severe slippage and may be impossible to execute at quoted prices.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Complete absence of holder data — cannot assess distribution or insider risk
Extreme sell-side dominance (71.1% sell pressure, 3.6:1 seller-to-buyer ratio)
Critically shallow liquidity ($46K) relative to trading volume ($698K/24h)
Classic pump-and-dump price pattern with shooting-star reversal candle
No social links, no description, unverified contract — zero project transparency
Pump.fun origin with no stated utility, roadmap, or team
Mint/freeze authority status unconfirmed — potential rug vector

Mitigating factors

Token metadata is marked 'Mutable: false' — metadata cannot be altered
'Possible spam: false' flag from the data provider
Token is actively trading on PumpSwap with real volume — not a ghost token
FDV is very low (~$134K) meaning absolute loss exposure is limited at small position sizes

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for immediate total loss. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

puffercat is a Pump.fun meme token in the midst of a speculative pump with no fundamental backing, no visible community, no holder data, and severe sell-side dominance. The investment case is purely speculative momentum-based, and the risk/reward is highly unfavorable given the current technical setup and market structure.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral momentum continuation: the token attracts social media attention, new buyers pile in, liquidity deepens, and the price sustains above $0.000138 and challenges the $0.000207 double-top resistance.

Viral spread on Crypto Twitter/Telegram meme communities
Influencer promotion driving new buyer inflow
Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifting all micro-caps
Liquidity providers adding depth to the PumpSwap pool

Base Case

Gradual price decay: the pump fades, volume drops off, and the token drifts lower over days/weeks, settling at a fraction of the pump high with minimal trading activity.

No major new catalysts emerge
Sell pressure moderates but buyers remain scarce
Liquidity stays thin, making price discovery unreliable
Token remains unverified with no community development

Bear Case

High probability

Pump exhaustion and dump: sell pressure continues to dominate, liquidity is drained, price collapses back to pre-pump levels of $0.000029–$0.000031 or lower, and the token becomes illiquid.

Continued 71.1% sell-side dominance draining liquidity
No new buyer catalysts to sustain momentum
Shallow $46K liquidity pool unable to absorb selling
Early holders/insiders distributing into the pump as evidenced by 3.6:1 seller-to-buyer ratio

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 30, 05:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-30 17:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (Solana token registry)
PumpSwap DEX pair data (BiCeKb3mEmzDNqk1zwjrDq4dJzX1ruUzVSLxXGvttgSC)
OHLC hourly candle data (3 candles)
24h trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)
Holder metrics API
Historical holder series (30 days)
Sniper analysis endpoint

Limitations

Holder data entirely unavailable (0 reported across all metrics and 30-day history) — likely indexing failure, not true zero holders
Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
No sniper/early buyer data available — smart money signals are inferred from trading analytics only
Top holder / whale map data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
Mint and freeze authority status not confirmed — authority risk is estimated
Update authority listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm renouncement
FDV discrepancy between metadata ($134.7K) and analytics ($151.5K) — minor but noted
Token is very new and low-profile — data provider coverage may be incomplete

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data used contains significant gaps (holder data, sniper data, whale map) that materially limit analytical confidence. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is puffercat a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell puffercat?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is puffercat ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling puffercat?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is puffercat liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-30 17:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $46,159.91. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for puffercat (puffercat)?

Is puffercat a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for immediate total loss. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

What are the key risks of holding puffercat?

Complete absence of holder data — cannot assess distribution or insider risk • Extreme sell-side dominance (71.1% sell pressure, 3.6:1 seller-to-buyer ratio) • Critically shallow liquidity ($46K) relative to trading volume ($698K/24h)