Aura Gambling Price Today & AI Analysis

Q: Can I sell Aura Gambling (Gambling)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 24, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

Q: Is Gambling a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand memecoin mechanics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana micro-cap token risks. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump scheme.

GamblingSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 14, 2026

$0.0₅3374

Contract

Live

ERtshh2mi4hhdJjSc44ZQLK1KtTe8GARDs9LUmEmpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

154

Market cap

$3,373

At a $1M market cap, $GAMBLING would be $0.001000 (296x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is Gambling a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 24

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about Gambling

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

StartpupStartpup$0.0₅2755+0.3%MC $2.7K

MCJAKCONOR MCJAK$0.0₅2499+0.0%MC $2.5K

CHIPOTLAICHIPOTLAI MAX$0.0₅2743+0.0%MC $2.7K

kawadogeChiikawa Doge$0.0₅2123+0.0%MC $2.0K

threehalvesthreehalves$0.0₅4227+0.0%MC $4.2K

FrongusFrongus$0.000223+439.8%MC $215.3K

Aura Gambling: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-14 14:49 UTC

Holder addresses

242

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$31,978.51

How concentrated is Aura Gambling ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 242 addresses (2026-06-14 14:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Aura Gambling?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Aura Gambling liquidity falling?: As of 2026-06-14 14:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $31,978.51. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-14 14:49 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 14, 02:49 PM UTC

FDV

$47,441

Liquidity

$31,978.51

Holders

242

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Aura Gambling (Gambling) is a PumpSwap-listed Solana memecoin with a micro-cap FDV of ~$47.4K and total liquidity of ~$32K. The token launched quietly, sat dormant at 85 holders for roughly a month, then exploded to 389 holders on June 13 before pulling back to 242 by June 14. Price spiked to ~$0.000102 intraday before retracing sharply to ~$0.0000474. Sell pressure dominates heavily (68.3% sell volume), liquidity is extremely shallow, and supply concentration is high. No verified contract, no social links, no description, and update authority is unknown — all significant red flags for a very high-risk speculative asset.

Key points

Extreme dormancy followed by sudden holder explosion (+286 holders in a single day on June 13)
Very high sell pressure: 68.3% of 24h volume is sells ($246.93K vs $114.84K buys)
Top 10 holders control 42.82% of supply; top 100 control 90.69%
Liquidity is critically shallow at ~$32K against $47.4K FDV
No social links, no description, unverified contract — minimal project transparency

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

Price has retraced from the intraday high of ~$0.000102 (candle 14) to ~$0.0000474. Sell pressure is dominant at 68.3% of volume. The last two candles show modest recovery but volume is declining sharply (5,642 and 12,241 vs 48,840–69,713 during the spike). The path of least resistance is further downside unless fresh buy volume emerges.

Target low

$0.000029

Target high

$0.000055

Support: $0.000033–$0.000034 (candles 4, 11, 12 lows), $0.000029–$0.000030 (candle 4 low, candle 8 low)
Resistance: $0.000050–$0.000051 (candle 3 high), $0.000061–$0.000062 (candles 17–18 highs), $0.000078–$0.000088 (candles 13–15 range)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

The token was completely dormant for ~30 days before a single-day pump. Without sustained community development, social presence, or utility, the probability of a sustained recovery is low. The sharp holder decline from 389 to 242 within 24 hours suggests early buyers are exiting rapidly.

Catalysts

Renewed social media attention or influencer promotion
Broader Solana memecoin market rally
Liquidity addition by project team or whales
Unexpected utility or partnership announcement

Bullish factors

24h price is up 41.77% from prior day baseline
5m price change is +5.43%, suggesting short-term momentum
6h change is +6.34%, indicating some recovery from intraday lows
Holder count grew +157 over 7 days (65%)

Bearish factors

68.3% of 24h volume is sell pressure ($246.93K sells vs $114.84K buys)
Holders dropped from 389 to 242 (-147) in under 24 hours — mass exit
Liquidity is only ~$32K, making large exits extremely slippage-prone
Price crashed from ~$0.000102 to ~$0.0000336 (candles 12–14 to 11) — a ~67% intraday drop
No social links, no description, unverified contract
Token was dormant for ~30 days before the pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the token's extremely short active trading history (effectively 1–2 days of real activity), absence of any project fundamentals, unknown update authority, and highly manipulable micro-cap liquidity. Price targets are derived purely from recent OHLC levels.

Gambling call history

Full track record →

Jun 14bearish@ $0.0000474

24h-35.0%

7d-53.1%

30d-87.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: ERtshh...pump
Total Supply: 999,988,266.91

Key Risks

Extreme liquidity shallowness ($32K) creates high slippage and exit risk for any meaningful position
Dominant sell pressure (68.3% of volume, 2.78:1 seller-to-buyer ratio) signals active distribution
Holder count already declining sharply from peak (389 → 242, -37.8% in <24h)
30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump is a classic pump-and-dump pattern

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

18 hourly candles reviewed. Candle 18 (21:00 June 13) shows a massive bullish engulfing from $0.0000266 low to $0.0000620 high — the initial pump candle with very high volume ($45.8K). Candles 15–16 (23:00–00:00) show continuation with volume peaking at $69.7K and $48.8K respectively, reaching highs of $0.0000585 and $0.0000783. Candle 14 (01:00 June 14) marks the absolute peak at $0.000102 with $24.3K volume. Candles 12–13 (02:00–03:00) show a sharp bearish reversal — candle 12 opens at $0.0000840 and crashes to close at $0.0000338 on $26K volume, a clear bearish engulfing/crash candle. Candles 4–11 form a base/consolidation range between $0.0000297 and $0.0000410. Candles 1–3 show a modest recovery attempt, with candle 3 being a strong bullish candle (open $0.0000377, high $0.0000507, close $0.0000458) on $8.9K volume.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term (last 3 candles) shows a modest recovery from the post-crash lows, forming higher lows. Medium-term (18-candle view) is clearly a downtrend from the $0.000102 peak, with price currently at roughly 46% of the peak. The overall structure is a classic pump-and-dump pattern: explosive spike followed by rapid distribution.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

32%

Sell

68%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000033–$0.000034 (multiple candle lows in candles 4, 11, 12)

Major support

$0.000029–$0.000030 (candles 4 and 8 absolute lows)

Immediate resistance

$0.000050–$0.000051 (candle 3 high of $0.0000507)

Major resistance

$0.000061–$0.000062 (candles 17–18 highs)

The $0.000033–$0.000034 zone has acted as support across multiple candles (4, 11, 12) and represents the key near-term floor. A break below $0.000029 would signal capitulation. On the upside, $0.000050 is the first meaningful resistance from candle 3's high, with the $0.000061 zone representing the pre-peak consolidation area.

Notable patterns

Bullish engulfing at launch (candle 18) — massive volume spike initiating the pump
Bearish crash candle (candle 12) — opens at $0.0000840, closes at $0.0000338, ~60% intracandle collapse
Multi-candle base formation (candles 4–11) in $0.000030–$0.000041 range suggesting accumulation/distribution
Declining volume on recovery (candles 1–3) — bearish divergence
Classic pump-and-dump price structure: parabolic spike followed by sharp retracement to ~46% of peak

Liquidity

$31,978.51

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at ~$32K against a $47.4K FDV — the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 67%, which sounds reasonable but in absolute dollar terms means any trade above a few hundred dollars will cause significant slippage. The 24h trading volume of ~$361.8K ($114.84K buys + $246.93K sells) is approximately 11x the total liquidity, indicating extremely high turnover relative to pool depth. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow): sell volume is 2.15x buy volume. The 1,291 unique sellers vs 464 unique buyers (2.78:1 ratio) confirms broad-based distribution. Market health is poor — this is a token in active distribution/exit phase with insufficient liquidity to support orderly exits for all holders.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,988,266.91

FDV

$47,440.72

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price swung from ~$0.0000266 to ~$0.000102 and back to ~$0.0000336 within 12 hours — an intraday range of ~283% peak-to-trough. Extreme volatility makes position sizing and exit timing extremely difficult.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only ~$32K. Any sell order above ~$500–$1,000 will incur significant slippage. With 24h volume of ~$362K against $32K liquidity, the pool is being rapidly drained and replenished, creating unpredictable depth.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme liquidity shallowness ($32K) creates high slippage and exit risk for any meaningful position
Dominant sell pressure (68.3% of volume, 2.78:1 seller-to-buyer ratio) signals active distribution
Holder count already declining sharply from peak (389 → 242, -37.8% in <24h)
30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump is a classic pump-and-dump pattern
Unknown update authority and unverified contract — cannot confirm mint/freeze authority renouncement
No social links, no description, no community infrastructure — zero fundamental support
Micro-cap FDV ($47.4K) makes price trivially manipulable by any single large holder

Mitigating factors

Mutable=false suggests metadata cannot be altered
Pump.fun origin (inferred from mint address) typically involves burned mint authority upon graduation
LP pool holds 19.97% of supply, providing some baseline liquidity
Top 2–10 holders show relatively even distribution (2.20%–2.98% each) rather than one dominant whale outside the LP

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand memecoin mechanics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana micro-cap token risks. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump scheme.

Aura Gambling (Gambling) is a high-risk Solana memecoin that experienced a classic pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days of dormancy, a single explosive day of price and holder growth, followed by rapid distribution. With $32K liquidity, 68.3% sell pressure, holders declining from 389 to 242 in under 24h, and zero project fundamentals, the risk-reward profile is extremely unfavorable for new entrants. The only viable thesis is short-term speculative trading with strict stop-losses.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A renewed wave of social media attention or influencer promotion triggers a second pump, driving price back toward the $0.000061–$0.000078 resistance zone. Fresh liquidity enters the pool, stabilizing the token above $0.000047.

Viral social media moment or influencer call
Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting all micro-caps
Coordinated whale accumulation at current lows
Pump.fun or PumpSwap trending list placement

Base Case

Price consolidates in the $0.000029–$0.000047 range for several days as the initial pump excitement fades. Holder count stabilizes around 150–200. Token trades with low volume and high volatility, gradually drifting lower as liquidity thins. Eventually becomes dormant again unless a new catalyst emerges.

No major new catalyst emerges in the near term
Sell pressure moderates but remains dominant
Liquidity pool remains intact at current levels
Token does not attract significant new community or utility development

Bear Case

High probability

Continued holder exodus and sell pressure drain the liquidity pool further. Price breaks below the $0.000029–$0.000030 support zone, triggering a cascade to near-zero as remaining holders exit. Token becomes effectively illiquid.

Sustained 68.3% sell pressure with no new buyer catalyst
Continued holder decline (already -147 in 24h)
Shallow liquidity unable to absorb ongoing sell pressure
No fundamentals, community, or utility to attract long-term holders
Potential coordinated dump by top holders 2–10

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 14, 02:49 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-14 14:49 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals, mutability)
PumpSwap pair price and liquidity data
18 hourly OHLC candles (June 13–14, 2026)
24h trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and distribution data
Top 20 holder addresses and balances
30-day daily historical holder series
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Sniper/smart money data unavailable — early buyer PnL and concentration cannot be assessed
Update authority status is 'unknown' — mint and freeze authority renouncement cannot be confirmed
Token has only ~1–2 days of active trading history, making technical analysis statistically unreliable
No social links or project description available — fundamental analysis is impossible
Micro-cap liquidity ($32K) means price is highly manipulable and OHLC data may not reflect true market depth
Holder classifications are inferred from address patterns and context, not verified labels
The 30-day holder series shows zero change for 28 days, suggesting the token may have been pre-minted and held by insiders before public launch

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap memecoins, carry extreme risk of total loss. The analyst has no position in this token. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Aura Gambling (Gambling) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 24, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Aura Gambling (Gambling)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 24, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Aura Gambling ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 242 addresses (2026-06-14 14:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Aura Gambling?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Aura Gambling liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-14 14:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $31,978.51. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Aura Gambling (Gambling)?

Is Gambling a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand memecoin mechanics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana micro-cap token risks. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump scheme.

What are the key risks of holding Gambling?

Extreme liquidity shallowness ($32K) creates high slippage and exit risk for any meaningful position • Dominant sell pressure (68.3% of volume, 2.78:1 seller-to-buyer ratio) signals active distribution • Holder count already declining sharply from peak (389 → 242, -37.8% in <24h)