Gambling

Aura Gambling Price Today & AI Analysis

Gambling
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 14, 2026

ERtshh2mi4hhdJjSc44ZQLK1KtTe8GARDs9LUmEmpump

$0.055848

FDV $5,847

LiveContract:ERtshh2mi4hhdJjSc44ZQLK1KtTe8GARDs9LUmEmpumpChain:SolanaHolders:180Market cap:$5,847

More tokens on Solana

STEAK

STEAK

Steak

$0.0524640.0%
MC $2.5K
MCJAK

MCJAK

CONOR MCJAK

$0.0524550.0%
MC $2.5K
CHIPOTLAI

CHIPOTLAI

CHIPOTLAI MAX

$0.0522340.0%
MC $2.2K
kawadoge

kawadoge

Chiikawa Doge

$0.0521230.0%
MC $2.0K
CASHLESS

CASHLESS

CASHLESS

$0.0536040.2%
MC $3.6K
STONK

STONK

STONK

$0.303648.5%
MC $258.92M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Gambling

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jun 14, 02:49 PM
FDV

$47,441

Liquidity

$31,979

Holders

242

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Aura Gambling (Gambling) is a PumpSwap-listed Solana memecoin with a micro-cap FDV of ~$47.4K and total liquidity of ~$32K. The token launched quietly, sat dormant at 85 holders for roughly a month, then exploded to 389 holders on June 13 before pulling back to 242 by June 14. Price spiked to ~$0.000102 intraday before retracing sharply to ~$0.0000474. Sell pressure dominates heavily (68.3% sell volume), liquidity is extremely shallow, and supply concentration is high. No verified contract, no social links, no description, and update authority is unknown — all significant red flags for a very high-risk speculative asset.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme dormancy followed by sudden holder explosion (+286 holders in a single day on June 13)
Very high sell pressure: 68.3% of 24h volume is sells ($246.93K vs $114.84K buys)
Top 10 holders control 42.82% of supply; top 100 control 90.69%
Liquidity is critically shallow at ~$32K against $47.4K FDV
No social links, no description, unverified contract — minimal project transparency

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

Price has retraced from the intraday high of ~$0.000102 (candle 14) to ~$0.0000474. Sell pressure is dominant at 68.3% of volume. The last two candles show modest recovery but volume is declining sharply (5,642 and 12,241 vs 48,840–69,713 during the spike). The path of least resistance is further downside unless fresh buy volume emerges.

Target low$0.000029
Target high$0.000055
Support: $0.000033–$0.000034 (candles 4, 11, 12 lows), $0.000029–$0.000030 (candle 4 low, candle 8 low)
Resistance: $0.000050–$0.000051 (candle 3 high), $0.000061–$0.000062 (candles 17–18 highs), $0.000078–$0.000088 (candles 13–15 range)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

The token was completely dormant for ~30 days before a single-day pump. Without sustained community development, social presence, or utility, the probability of a sustained recovery is low. The sharp holder decline from 389 to 242 within 24 hours suggests early buyers are exiting rapidly.

Catalysts
  • Renewed social media attention or influencer promotion
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally
  • Liquidity addition by project team or whales
  • Unexpected utility or partnership announcement

Bullish factors

  • 24h price is up 41.77% from prior day baseline
  • 5m price change is +5.43%, suggesting short-term momentum
  • 6h change is +6.34%, indicating some recovery from intraday lows
  • Holder count grew +157 over 7 days (65%)

Bearish factors

  • 68.3% of 24h volume is sell pressure ($246.93K sells vs $114.84K buys)
  • Holders dropped from 389 to 242 (-147) in under 24 hours — mass exit
  • Liquidity is only ~$32K, making large exits extremely slippage-prone
  • Price crashed from ~$0.000102 to ~$0.0000336 (candles 12–14 to 11) — a ~67% intraday drop
  • No social links, no description, unverified contract
  • Token was dormant for ~30 days before the pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the token's extremely short active trading history (effectively 1–2 days of real activity), absence of any project fundamentals, unknown update authority, and highly manipulable micro-cap liquidity. Price targets are derived purely from recent OHLC levels.

Gambling call history

Full track record →
Jun 14bearish
24h-35.0%
7d-53.1%
30d-87.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

18 hourly candles reviewed. Candle 18 (21:00 June 13) shows a massive bullish engulfing from $0.0000266 low to $0.0000620 high — the initial pump candle with very high volume ($45.8K). Candles 15–16 (23:00–00:00) show continuation with volume peaking at $69.7K and $48.8K respectively, reaching highs of $0.0000585 and $0.0000783. Candle 14 (01:00 June 14) marks the absolute peak at $0.000102 with $24.3K volume. Candles 12–13 (02:00–03:00) show a sharp bearish reversal — candle 12 opens at $0.0000840 and crashes to close at $0.0000338 on $26K volume, a clear bearish engulfing/crash candle. Candles 4–11 form a base/consolidation range between $0.0000297 and $0.0000410. Candles 1–3 show a modest recovery attempt, with candle 3 being a strong bullish candle (open $0.0000377, high $0.0000507, close $0.0000458) on $8.9K volume.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
neutral

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 32%Sell 68%

Short-term (last 3 candles) shows a modest recovery from the post-crash lows, forming higher lows. Medium-term (18-candle view) is clearly a downtrend from the $0.000102 peak, with price currently at roughly 46% of the peak. The overall structure is a classic pump-and-dump pattern: explosive spike followed by rapid distribution.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000033–$0.000034 (multiple candle lows in candles 4, 11, 12)
Major$0.000029–$0.000030 (candles 4 and 8 absolute lows)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000050–$0.000051 (candle 3 high of $0.0000507)
Major$0.000061–$0.000062 (candles 17–18 highs)

The $0.000033–$0.000034 zone has acted as support across multiple candles (4, 11, 12) and represents the key near-term floor. A break below $0.000029 would signal capitulation. On the upside, $0.000050 is the first meaningful resistance from candle 3's high, with the $0.000061 zone representing the pre-peak consolidation area.

Notable patterns

  • Bullish engulfing at launch (candle 18) — massive volume spike initiating the pump
  • Bearish crash candle (candle 12) — opens at $0.0000840, closes at $0.0000338, ~60% intracandle collapse
  • Multi-candle base formation (candles 4–11) in $0.000030–$0.000041 range suggesting accumulation/distribution
  • Declining volume on recovery (candles 1–3) — bearish divergence
  • Classic pump-and-dump price structure: parabolic spike followed by sharp retracement to ~46% of peak

Total holders242
24h Δ+26
7d Δ+65
30d Δ+65
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

Holder growth is strongly correlated with the price pump event on June 13. The token had exactly 85 holders for the entire period from May 15 to June 11 (28 days of zero change), then surged to 389 on June 13 (+286, +74% in one day) coinciding with the price spike to $0.000102. However, holders have since dropped to 242 by June 14, suggesting the growth was speculative and is now reversing. The 1h change of -22 holders (-9.1%) confirms accelerating exits.

The holder history reveals a stark pattern: complete dormancy for ~30 days (85 holders, zero change from May 15 to June 11), followed by an explosive single-day gain of +286 holders on June 13 coinciding with the price pump. This is a textbook pump-and-dump holder pattern. The subsequent rapid decline from 389 to 242 holders within 24 hours (-147 holders, -37.8%) confirms mass exit behavior. The 7d and 30d growth figures of +65% are misleading as they are entirely attributable to the single pump event. Growth is NOT accelerating — it is actively reversing.

Top 10 hold42.82%
Top 100 hold90.69%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

8XqkhTDrGX3uXHGsotXRS2uoqSydfswuK7G4wTTUKCdV

DEX liquidity pool — this address matches the PumpSwap pair address listed in the price data

19.97%

HUxmENqFCVWw43aPEyZMhNPg1W5qGdCDQVaSfZjnP8Yf

Individual whale or early buyer

2.98%

7xcGK4vBKUbHT8rCkEG29N16A9jqUf82fUypfE57acgs

Individual whale or early buyer

2.85%

5uDWaFKzbFzUEVBpBKUhi5NQSErPmk1XxGx5vs3NcpMi

Individual whale or early buyer

2.63%

3zV5KfCrLQq2SfDYyDL1VDjLKoEFFMA6BJge7NAiQdz4

Individual whale or early buyer

2.58%

The top holder at 19.97% (address 8XqkhTDrGX3uXHGsotXRS2uoqSydfswuK7G4wTTUKCdV) is the PumpSwap liquidity pool pair address — this is protocol-locked liquidity, not a selling threat. Excluding the LP, the remaining top 9 holders each hold 2.20%–2.98%, a surprisingly even distribution among individual wallets. However, top 10 still control 42.82% of supply and top 100 control 90.69%, indicating extreme concentration. With 1,291 unique sellers vs 464 buyers in 24h and holders declining from 389 to 242, the overall whale/holder sentiment is clearly distributing. The even spread among holders 2–10 may suggest coordinated wallets or a structured distribution mechanism.

Liquidity$31,980
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$114,840
Sell$246,930
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers464
Unique sellers1,291

Liquidity is critically shallow at ~$32K against a $47.4K FDV — the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 67%, which sounds reasonable but in absolute dollar terms means any trade above a few hundred dollars will cause significant slippage. The 24h trading volume of ~$361.8K ($114.84K buys + $246.93K sells) is approximately 11x the total liquidity, indicating extremely high turnover relative to pool depth. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow): sell volume is 2.15x buy volume. The 1,291 unique sellers vs 464 unique buyers (2.78:1 ratio) confirms broad-based distribution. Market health is poor — this is a token in active distribution/exit phase with insufficient liquidity to support orderly exits for all holders.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,988,266.91
FDV$47,440.72

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~999.99M tokens (effectively 1 billion), a standard memecoin supply figure. FDV is micro-cap at ~$47.4K. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is unverified. Mutable is set to false, which is a mild positive indicator suggesting metadata cannot be changed. However, mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data — these are critical unknowns for a token of this risk profile. The 'ERtshh2mi4hhdJjSc44ZQLK1KtTe8GARDs9LUmEmpump' mint address ending in 'pump' suggests it was launched via Pump.fun, where mint authority is typically burned upon bonding curve graduation. However, this cannot be confirmed without on-chain authority verification. No description, no social links, and no verified contract compound the tokenomics risk.

Volatility
high

Price swung from ~$0.0000266 to ~$0.000102 and back to ~$0.0000336 within 12 hours — an intraday range of ~283% peak-to-trough. Extreme volatility makes position sizing and exit timing extremely difficult.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only ~$32K. Any sell order above ~$500–$1,000 will incur significant slippage. With 24h volume of ~$362K against $32K liquidity, the pool is being rapidly drained and replenished, creating unpredictable depth.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 42.82% of supply; top 100 control 90.69%. Excluding the LP pool (19.97%), holders 2–10 each hold 2.20%–2.98%. While individually modest, collectively these wallets could coordinate to dump significant supply.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available. However, the token was dormant for 30 days before the pump, suggesting potential pre-planned accumulation. The rapid holder decline from 389 to 242 in 24h indicates early buyers are already exiting aggressively.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown', contract is unverified, and mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The 'pump' suffix suggests Pump.fun origin where mint authority is typically burned, but this is unconfirmed. Mutable=false is a mild positive.

Key risks

  • Extreme liquidity shallowness ($32K) creates high slippage and exit risk for any meaningful position
  • Dominant sell pressure (68.3% of volume, 2.78:1 seller-to-buyer ratio) signals active distribution
  • Holder count already declining sharply from peak (389 → 242, -37.8% in <24h)
  • 30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump is a classic pump-and-dump pattern
  • Unknown update authority and unverified contract — cannot confirm mint/freeze authority renouncement
  • No social links, no description, no community infrastructure — zero fundamental support
  • Micro-cap FDV ($47.4K) makes price trivially manipulable by any single large holder

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable=false suggests metadata cannot be altered
  • Pump.fun origin (inferred from mint address) typically involves burned mint authority upon graduation
  • LP pool holds 19.97% of supply, providing some baseline liquidity
  • Top 2–10 holders show relatively even distribution (2.20%–2.98% each) rather than one dominant whale outside the LP
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand memecoin mechanics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana micro-cap token risks. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump scheme.

Aura Gambling (Gambling) is a high-risk Solana memecoin that experienced a classic pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days of dormancy, a single explosive day of price and holder growth, followed by rapid distribution. With $32K liquidity, 68.3% sell pressure, holders declining from 389 to 242 in under 24h, and zero project fundamentals, the risk-reward profile is extremely unfavorable for new entrants. The only viable thesis is short-term speculative trading with strict stop-losses.

Bull case (low)

A renewed wave of social media attention or influencer promotion triggers a second pump, driving price back toward the $0.000061–$0.000078 resistance zone. Fresh liquidity enters the pool, stabilizing the token above $0.000047.

  • Viral social media moment or influencer call
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting all micro-caps
  • Coordinated whale accumulation at current lows
  • Pump.fun or PumpSwap trending list placement

Base case

Price consolidates in the $0.000029–$0.000047 range for several days as the initial pump excitement fades. Holder count stabilizes around 150–200. Token trades with low volume and high volatility, gradually drifting lower as liquidity thins. Eventually becomes dormant again unless a new catalyst emerges.

  • No major new catalyst emerges in the near term
  • Sell pressure moderates but remains dominant
  • Liquidity pool remains intact at current levels
  • Token does not attract significant new community or utility development

Bear case (high)

Continued holder exodus and sell pressure drain the liquidity pool further. Price breaks below the $0.000029–$0.000030 support zone, triggering a cascade to near-zero as remaining holders exit. Token becomes effectively illiquid.

  • Sustained 68.3% sell pressure with no new buyer catalyst
  • Continued holder decline (already -147 in 24h)
  • Shallow liquidity unable to absorb ongoing sell pressure
  • No fundamentals, community, or utility to attract long-term holders
  • Potential coordinated dump by top holders 2–10

GeneratedJun 14, 02:49 PM
Data freshnessPrice and candle data current as of candle close ~14:00 UTC June 14, 2026. Holder data reflects state at time of data pull. Historical holder series covers May 15 – June 13, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals, mutability)
  • PumpSwap pair price and liquidity data
  • 18 hourly OHLC candles (June 13–14, 2026)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • 30-day daily historical holder series
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Sniper/smart money data unavailable — early buyer PnL and concentration cannot be assessed
  • Update authority status is 'unknown' — mint and freeze authority renouncement cannot be confirmed
  • Token has only ~1–2 days of active trading history, making technical analysis statistically unreliable
  • No social links or project description available — fundamental analysis is impossible
  • Micro-cap liquidity ($32K) means price is highly manipulable and OHLC data may not reflect true market depth
  • Holder classifications are inferred from address patterns and context, not verified labels
  • The 30-day holder series shows zero change for 28 days, suggesting the token may have been pre-minted and held by insiders before public launch

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap memecoins, carry extreme risk of total loss. The analyst has no position in this token. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,988,266.91

Key Risks

•Extreme liquidity shallowness ($32K) creates high slippage and exit risk for any meaningful position
•Dominant sell pressure (68.3% of volume, 2.78:1 seller-to-buyer ratio) signals active distribution
•Holder count already declining sharply from peak (389 → 242, -37.8% in <24h)
•30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump is a classic pump-and-dump pattern

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data was provided for this token. Smart money signals are therefore limited to observable on-chain behavior. The dominant signal is heavy sell pressure: 7,457 sells vs 4,382 buys in 24h, with 1,291 unique sellers vs 464 unique buyers. This 2.78:1 seller-to-buyer ratio strongly suggests early holders and pump participants are distributing into any price strength. The sharp holder decline from 389 to 242 within 24 hours confirms rapid exit behavior.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available for this token.

Strongly negative — the holder count peaked at 389 on June 13 and dropped to 242 by June 14, a loss of 147 holders (-37.8%) in under 24 hours. This indicates early buyers who entered during the pump are aggressively exiting.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Aura Gambling (Gambling)?

Price has retraced from the intraday high of ~$0.000102 (candle 14) to ~$0.0000474. Sell pressure is dominant at 68.3% of volume. The last two candles show modest recovery but volume is declining sharply (5,642 and 12,241 vs 48,840–69,713 during the spike). The path of least resistance is further downside unless fresh buy volume emerges. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000029 to $0.000055.

Is Gambling a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand memecoin mechanics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana micro-cap token risks. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump scheme.

How are Gambling holders trending?

Aura Gambling currently has 242 holders and is growing (24h: 26, 7d: 65, 30d: 65). The holder history reveals a stark pattern: complete dormancy for ~30 days (85 holders, zero change from May 15 to June 11), followed by an explosive single-day gain of +286 holders on June 13 coinciding with the price pump. This is a textbook pump-and-dump holder pattern. The subsequent rapid decline from 389 to 242 holders within 24 hours (-147 holders, -37.8%) confirms mass exit behavior. The 7d and 30d growth figures of +65% are misleading as they are entirely attributable to the single pump event. Growth is NOT accelerating — it is actively reversing.

What does sniper activity look like for Gambling?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding Gambling?

Extreme liquidity shallowness ($32K) creates high slippage and exit risk for any meaningful position • Dominant sell pressure (68.3% of volume, 2.78:1 seller-to-buyer ratio) signals active distribution • Holder count already declining sharply from peak (389 → 242, -37.8% in <24h)

← Back to all predictions

Track Gambling