Goku

Goku Price Prediction 2026

Goku
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 25, 2026

Dm8g1s9t28bynXtGizmCTrJkWHk3UrriwRX2QChRpump

$0.042590

+1.84%

FDV $25,894

LiveContract:Dm8g1s9t28bynXtGizmCTrJkWHk3UrriwRX2QChRpumpChain:SolanaHolders:364Market cap:$25,894

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Goku

Report snapshotas of Jun 25, 08:19 AM
FDV

$234,721

Liquidity

$50,520

Holders

295

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Goku (GOKU) is a Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap (mint: Dm8g1s9t28bynXtGizmCTrJkWHk3UrriwRX2QChRpump) with a total supply of 1 billion tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$241K. The token has experienced an explosive 424% price surge in the past 24 hours, rising from near-zero to $0.000235. However, the data reveals a deeply concerning picture: the token sat dormant with only 13 holders for the entire 30-day historical period before an abrupt spike to 295 holders in the last 24 hours. Sell pressure dominates at 66.3% of volume, top holder concentration data is unavailable, and the token is unverified with no social links. This profile is consistent with a pump-and-dump or coordinated manipulation event.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive 424% 24h price surge from a near-zero base, suggesting coordinated pump activity
Token was completely dormant (13 holders, zero net change) for 30+ days before sudden activation
Sell pressure heavily dominates at 66.3% of 24h volume ($100.3K sells vs $50.99K buys)
No top holder data available, making concentration risk impossible to quantify — a major red flag
No social links, unverified contract, and unknown update authority — minimal transparency

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token is showing severe short-term bearish signals. The most recent 5-minute change is -12.76%, and sell pressure accounts for 66.3% of 24h volume. The candle structure shows a sharp spike followed by retracement — candle [1] closed well below its high ($0.0001189 vs high of $0.0002026), and candle [2] shows a bearish close below open. With 1,721 sells vs 947 buys and 609 sellers vs 267 buyers, distribution is clearly underway. A retest of the $0.000065–$0.000068 range (pre-pump base) is plausible.

Target low$0.000044
Target high$0.000280
Support: $0.000118 (candle [1] and [2] close zone), $0.000065–$0.000068 (pre-pump consolidation base, candles [4]–[5]), $0.000044–$0.000051 (candle [7] close and candle [6] open)
Resistance: $0.000209–$0.000211 (candle [2] and [3] highs), $0.000235 (current price / 24h peak zone), $0.000280 (extrapolated extension above recent high)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

Medium-term outlook is bearish. The token has no verified contract, no social presence, no disclosed team, and was dormant for 30+ days. The pump appears speculative and unsupported by fundamentals. Without sustained buying interest or a community catalyst, price is likely to retrace toward pre-pump levels or lower. Liquidity of only $50.52K is insufficient to support the current FDV of $241K.

Catalysts
  • Any whale or early holder sell-off could collapse price given shallow $50.52K liquidity
  • Absence of social links or community means no organic demand driver
  • If top holders (data unavailable) begin distributing, price could collapse rapidly
  • Broader Solana meme cycle rotation away from low-cap tokens

Bullish factors

  • 424% 24h price surge demonstrates strong short-term momentum
  • Holder count grew from 13 to 295 in 24h, showing rapid new interest
  • 1h price change of +112.6% suggests very recent buying activity
  • PumpSwap listing provides accessible on-chain trading venue

Bearish factors

  • 66.3% sell pressure ($100.3K sells vs $50.99K buys) indicates distribution dominates
  • Token was dormant for 30+ days with only 13 holders — suggests coordinated launch/pump
  • No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Shallow liquidity of $50.52K vs $241K FDV creates extreme slippage risk
  • No social links, unverified contract, unknown update authority
  • Most recent 5m candle: -12.76% — momentum already reversing
  • No community, no utility, no verified fundamentals
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to missing top holder data, unknown update authority, no sniper data, and the extreme volatility of a token that was dormant for 30+ days. The 424% pump in 24h with dominant sell pressure makes directional prediction highly uncertain — the token could spike further on renewed speculation or collapse entirely.

Goku call history

Full track record →
Jun 25bearish
24h-66.3%
7d-59.6%
30d-80.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Reviewing the 7 hourly candles (oldest to newest, candle [7] to [1]): Candle [7] (02:00 UTC) shows a low base with open $0.0000275, high $0.0000502, close $0.0000448 — a bullish candle establishing the launch base. Candle [6] (03:00) continues upward: O $0.0000513, H $0.0000549, C $0.0000549 — small bullish candle. Candle [5] (04:00): O $0.0000579, H $0.0000721, C $0.0000670 — continued grind up. Candle [4] (05:00): O $0.0000680, H $0.0000680, C $0.0000662 — near-doji, slight bearish close, consolidation. Candle [3] (06:00): O $0.0000658, H $0.0002094, C $0.0001200 — massive spike candle with a long upper wick, closing well below the high — a classic 'shooting star' or pump-and-dump wick pattern. Candle [2] (07:00): O $0.0001189, H $0.0002112, C $0.0000658 — extremely bearish engulfing/reversal candle; opened at prior close, spiked to new high $0.0002112, then collapsed to close at $0.0000658 — a severe bearish reversal signal. Candle [1] (08:00): O $0.0000658, H $0.0002026 (note: L field appears to contain the high value per data), C $0.0001189 — partial recovery but still well below the spike high. Note: In candle [1], the L value ($0.0002026) is higher than O and C, which appears to be a data anomaly (L and H may be swapped in the raw feed). Overall pattern: sharp pump with long upper wicks and bearish closes — textbook distribution/dump candle structure.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 34%Sell 66%

Short-term trend is a downtrend following the spike high. The candle structure shows a pump peak around $0.000209–$0.000211 (candles [2] and [3]) with subsequent closes well below those highs. The medium-term trend is also bearish given the 30-day dormancy followed by a single-day pump — no sustained uptrend has been established.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000118 (candle [1] and [2] close zone)
Major$0.000044–$0.000051 (candle [7] close and candle [6] open — pre-pump base)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000209–$0.000211 (candle [2] and [3] spike highs)
Major$0.000235 (current price, near 24h high zone)

The key support cluster is the pre-pump consolidation zone of $0.000065–$0.000068 (candles [4]–[5]), which represents the base before the explosive move. A break below this would target the launch base at $0.000044–$0.000051. Resistance is defined by the spike highs at $0.000209–$0.000211. The current price of $0.000235 sits above the spike highs, suggesting either a data lag or a continued push — but the candle structure strongly suggests distribution at these levels.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / long upper wick on candle [3] — bearish reversal signal at spike high
  • Bearish engulfing / collapse candle on candle [2] — opened at $0.0001189, spiked to $0.0002112, closed at $0.0000658
  • 30+ day dormancy followed by single-session pump — classic pump-and-dump setup
  • Volume spike coinciding with price spike then declining — distribution pattern
  • Possible data anomaly in candle [1] where L > O and L > C (L and H fields may be swapped in raw data feed)

Total holders295
24h Δ+282
7d Δ+282
30d Δ+282
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is entirely concentrated in the last 24 hours, perfectly correlated with the 424% price spike. The historical data shows a flat 13 holders from 2026-05-26 through 2026-06-24 (30 consecutive days of zero net change), followed by an explosive +282 holders (+96%) in a single day. This is not organic growth — it is a sudden influx of buyers attracted by the price pump, which is a hallmark of speculative FOMO-driven accumulation rather than sustainable community building.

The holder trend data reveals a deeply unusual pattern. For the entire 30-day historical window (May 26 – June 24, 2026), the token maintained exactly 13 holders with zero net change on every single day. This suggests the token was either inactive, held by a small group of insiders, or artificially suppressed. The sudden jump to 295 holders (+282, +96%) in the last 24 hours is entirely driven by the price pump. Acquisition data shows 275 of 295 holders acquired via swap (93.2%) and 20 via transfer (6.8%), confirming these are new buyers entering through trading rather than airdrop recipients. The rapid holder growth is a lagging indicator of the price spike, not a leading indicator of organic demand. Distribution data (whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0) and top holder concentration (top10=0%, top100=0%) appear to be data gaps rather than genuine readings.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

Data unavailable

Top holder data not provided by data source

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token — the data source returned no top 20 holders. The supply concentration fields show top10=0% and top100=0%, which are almost certainly data gaps rather than genuine readings (a token cannot have 0% concentration in its top holders). This is a significant analytical limitation and a red flag in itself — lack of holder transparency makes it impossible to assess whale risk, insider holdings, or potential dump risk. Given the 30-day dormancy with 13 holders and the sudden pump, it is highly probable that a small number of wallets hold a disproportionate share of supply. The 'very_concentrated' classification is assigned as a conservative risk assumption given the data gap and the token's behavioral profile.

Liquidity$50,520
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$50,990
Sell$100,300
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers267
Unique sellers609

Market health is poor. Total liquidity of $50.52K is extremely shallow relative to the $241K FDV — a ratio of roughly 1:4.8, meaning the market cap is nearly 5x the available liquidity. This creates severe slippage risk for any meaningful position size. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: sell volume ($100.3K) is nearly double buy volume ($50.99K), and unique sellers (609) outnumber unique buyers (267) by more than 2:1. The sell-to-buy ratio of 1,721 sells vs 947 buys further confirms sustained distribution pressure. The token trades on PumpSwap (pair H7nxGJbGafpCf2rp8wzqTMkz8aboW5znhVQF18AxtuQp), which is a permissionless venue with no additional vetting. The combination of shallow liquidity, dominant sell pressure, and a 2:1 seller-to-buyer ratio indicates a market in active distribution, not accumulation.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000 (1 billion)
FDV$241,470

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a fixed supply of 1 billion tokens with a current FDV of ~$241K. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is not verified. The token is marked as 'mutable: false' and 'master edition: false', which are minor positive signals suggesting the metadata cannot be easily changed. However, mint authority and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data — both are listed as unknown. The absence of social links, unverified contract status, and unknown authority structure means rug risk from authorities cannot be properly assessed. Investors should treat authority risk as elevated until on-chain authority accounts are independently verified as renounced. The token was launched via PumpFun (indicated by the 'pump' suffix in the mint address), which typically involves a bonding curve mechanism before graduating to a DEX — the token appears to have graduated to PumpSwap.

Volatility
high

424% price surge in 24 hours followed by immediate -12.76% reversal in 5 minutes. Hourly candles show swings of 200%+ from low to high within single candles. Extreme volatility makes position sizing and risk management nearly impossible.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $50.52K against a $241K FDV. Any sell order of meaningful size will cause severe slippage. The liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~21% is dangerously low for a token experiencing this level of trading activity.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is entirely unavailable (top10=0%, top100=0% appear to be data gaps). The token had only 13 holders for 30+ days, strongly implying extreme concentration among insiders. Without verifiable holder data, concentration risk must be assumed to be very high.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, but the 30-day dormancy with 13 holders followed by a sudden pump is a classic insider pre-positioning pattern. The 66.3% sell pressure and 609 sellers vs 267 buyers strongly suggests early holders are dumping into retail demand.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown', mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The token is unverified and has no social links. 'Mutable: false' is a minor positive signal. Overall authority risk is elevated due to lack of transparency, though the PumpFun launch mechanism typically involves some standardized authority handling.

Key risks

  • Token dormant for 30+ days with 13 holders — strong indicator of coordinated pump-and-dump
  • No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • 66.3% sell pressure with 609 sellers vs 267 buyers — active distribution underway
  • Shallow liquidity ($50.52K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk
  • No social links, unverified contract, unknown update authority — zero transparency
  • Mint and freeze authority status unknown — potential rug vector
  • Price already reversing: -12.76% in last 5 minutes despite 424% 24h gain
  • No utility, no community, no verified team — pure speculative meme token

Mitigating factors

  • Token metadata marked as 'mutable: false' — metadata cannot be easily altered
  • Launched via PumpFun/PumpSwap which has standardized launch mechanics
  • Holder count growing rapidly (295 total) suggesting some genuine market interest
  • 1h price change of +112.6% shows very recent buying activity still present
  • Total supply is fixed at 1 billion — no inflation risk if mint authority is renounced
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for extreme volatility and potential total loss. This is not an investment — it is a high-risk speculative trade with significant indicators of manipulation.

Goku (GOKU) is a high-risk Solana meme token exhibiting multiple hallmarks of a coordinated pump-and-dump: 30+ days of dormancy with 13 holders, explosive single-day activation, dominant sell pressure, missing holder concentration data, and no social or community infrastructure. The bull case relies entirely on continued speculative momentum; the bear case — which is strongly supported by on-chain data — is that early holders are distributing into retail FOMO buyers and the price will retrace sharply.

Bull case (low)

Continued speculative momentum drives further price appreciation if the token gains viral attention on social media or is picked up by influencers, pushing the FDV toward $500K–$1M+ in the short term.

  • Viral social media attention or influencer promotion (not currently evidenced)
  • Broader Solana meme season driving indiscriminate buying
  • Rapid holder growth (295 in 24h) could accelerate if momentum continues
  • 1h price change of +112.6% shows buying is still active in the very short term

Base case

The token experiences continued high volatility with further price swings in both directions over the next 24–72 hours, ultimately settling significantly below the current price as sell pressure overwhelms new buyers. The token may retain a small speculative community but fails to establish sustainable demand.

  • Sell pressure continues to dominate (66%+ of volume)
  • No major catalyst (influencer, listing, partnership) emerges to drive sustained buying
  • Liquidity remains shallow, amplifying price swings in both directions
  • Early holders continue distributing into any price recovery attempts

Bear case (high)

Early holders and insiders dump remaining supply into retail buyers, price collapses back to pre-pump levels ($0.000044–$0.000068) or lower, and the token returns to dormancy or dies entirely.

  • 66.3% sell pressure with 609 sellers vs 267 buyers — distribution already underway
  • 30-day dormancy with 13 holders strongly implies insider pre-positioning for a dump
  • Shallow $50.52K liquidity cannot absorb significant sell pressure
  • No community, no social links, no utility — no organic demand floor
  • Price already reversing: -12.76% in last 5 minutes

GeneratedJun 25, 08:19 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of approximately 2026-06-25T08:00–08:30 UTC. Historical holder data covers 2026-05-26 through 2026-06-24. OHLC data covers 2026-06-25T02:00–08:00 UTC (7 hourly candles).
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint: Dm8g1s9t28bynXtGizmCTrJkWHk3UrriwRX2QChRpump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (H7nxGJbGafpCf2rp8wzqTMkz8aboW5znhVQF18AxtuQp)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (7 candles, USD-denominated)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buyer/seller counts, price changes)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Top 20 holder data entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • Sniper analysis returned no data — early buyer PnL and sell-through rate unknown
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status all unknown — rug risk from authorities unverifiable
  • Supply concentration fields (top10=0%, top100=0%) appear to be data gaps, not genuine readings
  • Only 7 hourly candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Token is very new (activated within last 24h) — limited price history for pattern analysis
  • Candle [1] appears to have L and H values swapped in the raw data feed — noted as anomaly
  • No social links or community data available for sentiment analysis

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed shows multiple high-risk indicators. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

Key Risks

Token dormant for 30+ days with 13 holders — strong indicator of coordinated pump-and-dump
No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be quantified
66.3% sell pressure with 609 sellers vs 267 buyers — active distribution underway
Shallow liquidity ($50.52K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. However, the broader on-chain picture is concerning: the token was dormant with 13 holders for 30+ days before a sudden 24h activation, which is consistent with a coordinated launch by insiders who may have pre-positioned. The 66.3% sell pressure and 609 unique sellers vs 267 unique buyers suggests early holders or insiders are distributing into new retail demand. Without sniper data, the exact profit-taking risk from early buyers cannot be quantified, but circumstantial evidence strongly suggests it is elevated.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results.

Likely distributing — the 30-day dormancy with only 13 holders followed by a sudden pump strongly implies early holders are selling into the price spike. Sell volume ($100.3K) is nearly double buy volume ($50.99K) over 24h, with 1,721 sells vs 947 buys.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Goku (Goku)?

The token is showing severe short-term bearish signals. The most recent 5-minute change is -12.76%, and sell pressure accounts for 66.3% of 24h volume. The candle structure shows a sharp spike followed by retracement — candle [1] closed well below its high ($0.0001189 vs high of $0.0002026), and candle [2] shows a bearish close below open. With 1,721 sells vs 947 buys and 609 sellers vs 267 buyers, distribution is clearly underway. A retest of the $0.000065–$0.000068 range (pre-pump base) is plausible. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000044 to $0.000280.

Is Goku a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for extreme volatility and potential total loss. This is not an investment — it is a high-risk speculative trade with significant indicators of manipulation.

How are Goku holders trending?

Goku currently has 295 holders and is growing (24h: 282, 7d: 282, 30d: 282). The holder trend data reveals a deeply unusual pattern. For the entire 30-day historical window (May 26 – June 24, 2026), the token maintained exactly 13 holders with zero net change on every single day. This suggests the token was either inactive, held by a small group of insiders, or artificially suppressed. The sudden jump to 295 holders (+282, +96%) in the last 24 hours is entirely driven by the price pump. Acquisition data shows 275 of 295 holders acquired via swap (93.2%) and 20 via transfer (6.8%), confirming these are new buyers entering through trading rather than airdrop recipients. The rapid holder growth is a lagging indicator of the price spike, not a leading indicator of organic demand. Distribution data (whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0) and top holder concentration (top10=0%, top100=0%) appear to be data gaps rather than genuine readings.

What does sniper activity look like for Goku?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding Goku?

Token dormant for 30+ days with 13 holders — strong indicator of coordinated pump-and-dump • No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be quantified • 66.3% sell pressure with 609 sellers vs 267 buyers — active distribution underway

Track Goku