Bababoi

巴巴博一 Price Today & AI Analysis

Bababoi
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 26, 2026

7sBkh1NqMYsEuDXfqziyMdCUbcQpurLP6cyS7m9epump

$0.043112

+12.10%

FDV $26,364

LiveContract:7sBkh1NqMYsEuDXfqziyMdCUbcQpurLP6cyS7m9epumpChain:SolanaHolders:205Market cap:$26,364

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Bababoi

Report snapshotas of May 26, 09:47 PM
FDV

$308,516

Liquidity

$45,571

Holders

212

Snipers

38

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

巴巴博一 (Bababoi) is a Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap (pair JAmA6B77hrusBtW8RHRj46MrY7iN2Tnynk98ELW5uThd) with a total supply of ~847.3M tokens. The token has experienced an explosive 24h price surge of ~498%, rising from ~$0.000060 to ~$0.000364. Despite the dramatic pump, the token exhibits very thin liquidity ($45.57K), a small holder base (212 wallets), heavy sell pressure (64.3% sell volume), and significant concentration risk. The project has no description, an unverified contract, and unknown update authority, placing it firmly in the high-risk speculative category.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
~498% 24h price surge driven by a concentrated pump event starting around 17:00–19:00 UTC on May 26, 2026
Extremely thin liquidity of only $45.57K on PumpSwap, creating severe slippage risk
Top 10 holders control 33.76% of supply; top 100 control 82.28%, indicating high concentration
Sell pressure dominates at 64.3% of 24h volume ($72.96K sells vs $40.59K buys)
Only 212 total holders — a very nascent and fragile holder base
Mutable metadata is false, providing some immutability assurance despite unknown update authority

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token has already pumped ~498% in 24h and is showing early signs of reversal: the most recent hourly candle (21:00 UTC) closed at $0.0000630 — well below its open of $0.000132 — and sell pressure dominates at 64.3%. The 1h price change is already -2.84%. A retracement toward the pre-pump base (~$0.000060–$0.000063) is the most probable near-term outcome given the sell-heavy order flow and thin liquidity.

Target low$0.000060
Target high$0.000275
Support: $0.000063 (recent candle low / pre-pump consolidation zone), $0.000060 (multi-candle base from candles 7–10)
Resistance: $0.000132 (recent open/close cluster, candles 1–3), $0.000247 (candle 3 high), $0.000274 (candle 1 high — intraday peak)

Medium term

bearish
3–14 days

Without a sustained catalyst, new liquidity inflows, or community growth beyond 212 holders, the token is likely to retrace the majority of its pump gains. Historical holder data shows the base was declining from ~184 (May 7) to ~144 (May 25) before the pump, suggesting organic demand was weak. Continued sell pressure from early buyers and snipers (most in loss, some taking profits) will weigh on price.

Catalysts
  • Unexpected viral social media traction driving new buyer inflows
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all small caps
  • Whale accumulation at lower prices stabilizing the floor
  • Liquidity deepening via new LP additions

Bullish factors

  • Explosive 498% 24h price move demonstrates the token can attract speculative interest
  • 5m price change still positive at +6.52%, suggesting very short-term momentum
  • Holder count grew +68 (+32%) in 24h, showing new buyer interest during the pump
  • PumpSwap listing provides accessible entry/exit for retail traders
  • Mutable=false provides some metadata immutability assurance

Bearish factors

  • 64.3% sell pressure ($72.96K sells vs $40.59K buys) in 24h — sellers dominating
  • Most recent hourly candle closed sharply lower ($0.000063 close vs $0.000132 open)
  • Only $45.57K total liquidity — any meaningful sell order will crater the price
  • 212 total holders is an extremely thin base; 1h holder count dropped -19 (-9%)
  • Top 10 hold 33.76%, top 100 hold 82.28% — extreme concentration risk
  • Majority of snipers (15 of 20 with known PnL) are at a loss, with several at -44% to -65%
  • No project description, unverified contract, unknown update authority
  • Historical holder trend was declining for ~3 weeks before the pump
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) extremely thin liquidity making price highly manipulable, (2) only 10 hourly candles of meaningful price history available, (3) unknown update authority and unverified contract limiting on-chain transparency, (4) meme token dynamics are inherently unpredictable and driven by social sentiment rather than fundamentals.

Deep Analysis

10 hourly candles are available. Candles 6–10 (06:00–16:00 UTC) show extremely low volume ($0.33–$640) and flat price action around $0.000060–$0.000062, representing the pre-pump base. The pump ignites at candle 5 (17:00 UTC) with a spike to $0.000078, then accelerates sharply through candles 4–2 (18:00–20:00 UTC), reaching an intraday high of $0.000247 (candle 3) and $0.000274 (candle 1). Candle 1 (21:00 UTC) is a strong bearish candle: opens at $0.000132, reaches a high of $0.000132 (no upper wick), but the L/C values suggest the close was $0.000063 — a near full-body bearish reversal candle. Note: the OHLC data appears to have L and H fields swapped in some candles (L > H), which may indicate a data feed anomaly; analysis is based on the range implied by the values provided.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 36%Sell 64%

Short-term trend is technically 'up' given the 498% 24h gain, but the most recent candle signals a sharp reversal. The medium-term (30-day) trend was a declining holder base and flat/declining price before the pump, suggesting the underlying trend remains bearish once pump momentum fades.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000063 (recent candle close / pre-pump consolidation ceiling)
Major$0.000060 (multi-hour base from candles 7–10, May 26 06:00–12:00 UTC)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000132 (candle 1–3 open/close cluster)
Major$0.000274 (candle 1 intraday high — the pump peak)

The $0.000060–$0.000063 zone served as a multi-hour base before the pump and is now the key support to watch. A break below $0.000060 would signal complete pump reversal. On the upside, $0.000132 is the first meaningful resistance (where candles 1–3 clustered), and $0.000274 marks the absolute pump peak.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump signature: near-zero volume base followed by explosive volume spike and rapid price reversal
  • Bearish engulfing / shooting star on candle 1 (21:00 UTC): opened at $0.000132, closed near $0.000063 — a ~52% intracandle decline
  • Volume climax at candle 2 (20:00 UTC, $65,187) followed by declining volume — classic distribution top
  • Flat base consolidation (candles 6–10) before breakout — the base was ~$0.000060 for 6+ hours
  • No sustained higher-high structure: the pump appears to be a single-event spike rather than an organic uptrend

Total holders212
24h Δ+32
7d Δ+30
30d Δ+26
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The 24h holder growth of +68 (+32%) is directly correlated with the 498% price pump — new buyers entered during the spike. However, the 1h holder count dropped -19 (-9%), suggesting rapid profit-taking and exits as the price began to reverse. Prior to the pump (April 26 – May 25), the holder base was largely flat-to-declining, ranging from ~144 to ~184, with a net decline from ~184 (May 7) to ~144 (May 25). This indicates the pump-driven holder growth is likely transient.

Holder growth appears entirely pump-driven rather than organic. The 30-day historical data shows a declining trend from ~184 holders (May 7) to ~144 (May 25) — a loss of ~40 holders over 18 days. The 24h surge of +68 holders reversed this trend dramatically, but the immediate -19 holder drop in the most recent hour signals rapid exit behavior. Growth is technically 'accelerating' in the 24h window due to the pump, but the underlying organic trend was negative. The distribution skews heavily toward whales (98) and dolphins (69), with relatively few fish (27) and octopus (11), suggesting the holder base is dominated by larger positions rather than broad retail adoption.

Top 10 hold33.76%
Top 100 hold82.28%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

JAmA6B77hrusBtW8RHRj46MrY7iN2Tnynk98ELW5uThd

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address)

8.05%

2iPW98YGj9MBLqGMPPSM88wA2wEXuWYsWJhtUvN7EKCc

Individual whale / early holder

4.31%

4nKcXaT9rN85mBaUqVHaDRzHsyDA6a9H9LsY8jdDbdyg

Individual whale / early holder

4.30%

BZ8EfZcqvk5DxyzgM7R7ZVbQcY1tLov8r4yaGNmz6qDC

Individual whale / early holder

3.99%

9FHxwPTst74MSZoK1YxjcXte1Y1CRDTcsLKfHPGCeoHG

Individual whale / early holder

3.78%

The top 10 holders control 33.76% of supply and the top 100 control 82.28%, indicating a highly concentrated distribution. The largest single holder (8.05%, address JAmA6B77...) is the PumpSwap liquidity pool pair address — this is protocol-held liquidity, not a whale. Holders 2–10 are individual wallets holding 2.76%–4.31% each, consistent with early buyers or team-adjacent wallets. The near-identical balances of holders 2 and 3 (4.31% and 4.30%) are notable and may suggest coordinated accumulation or a split wallet strategy. With 82.28% of supply in the top 100 wallets and only 212 total holders, the token is extremely concentrated. Whale sentiment is mixed: some are holding (no large sell signals in top holders), but the dominant 24h sell pressure (64.3%) suggests mid-tier holders are distributing.

Liquidity$45,570
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$40,590
Sell$72,960
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers85
Unique sellers287

Liquidity is critically thin at $45.57K on a single PumpSwap pool. With a fully diluted valuation of ~$282–308K, the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 14.8–16.1%, which is low and means even modest sell orders will cause significant price impact. The 24h sell volume of $72.96K already exceeds total liquidity, confirming that the pump was driven by thin-book price action rather than deep market support. The buyer-to-seller ratio is severely skewed: 85 unique buyers vs 287 unique sellers (3.4:1 seller dominance), and 245 buy transactions vs 731 sell transactions (3:1 sell dominance). Net flow is clearly outflow. High slippage risk means any position of meaningful size cannot be exited without significant price impact. Market health is poor.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply847,322,324.77
FDV$308,516

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~847.3M tokens with a current FDV of ~$308.5K at the pumped price ($282.8K per trading analytics). The token has 6 decimals, standard for Solana SPL tokens. Update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and mutable is set to false — the immutability of metadata is a mild positive signal. However, mint authority and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the available data, so they cannot be confirmed as renounced. The unverified contract status and absence of a project description are red flags. No tokenomics documentation (vesting, allocation, team share) is available. The lack of transparency around authority keys means rug risk from authorities cannot be assessed and should be treated as elevated until confirmed otherwise.

Volatility
high

498% price surge in 24h followed by immediate reversal signals extreme volatility. The token can lose 50%+ of its value within a single hourly candle, as demonstrated by candle 1 (21:00 UTC) which saw a ~52% intracandle decline.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $45.57K on a single PumpSwap pool. The 24h sell volume ($72.96K) already exceeds total liquidity. Any position above ~$1,000–2,000 will face severe slippage. Exit risk is extremely high.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 33.76% of supply; top 100 control 82.28%. With only 212 total holders, a handful of wallets could devastate the price if they sell. Holders 2 and 3 have near-identical balances (~4.3% each), suggesting possible coordinated holdings.

SniperDump
medium

20 snipers were identified. Most are at a loss (15/20 negative PnL), reducing immediate dump pressure from this cohort. However, 3 snipers are in profit (including one at +644.9%) and may sell into any price recovery. Several snipers holding $0 balance have already exited.

Authority
medium

Update authority is unknown; mint and freeze authority status are unconfirmed. Mutable=false provides some assurance on metadata immutability, but the inability to confirm renounced mint/freeze authority means the risk of supply manipulation or account freezing cannot be ruled out. Unverified contract adds to this concern.

Key risks

  • Extreme price volatility — 498% pump followed by immediate reversal signals unsustainable price action
  • Critically thin liquidity ($45.57K) making exit nearly impossible at scale without severe slippage
  • Dominant sell pressure: 287 unique sellers vs 85 buyers; 731 sell txns vs 245 buy txns in 24h
  • High supply concentration: top 100 wallets hold 82.28% of supply
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential for supply manipulation or account freezing
  • No project description, unverified contract, no documented tokenomics or team
  • Holder base was declining for 3 weeks before the pump — no organic growth foundation
  • 1h holder count dropped -19 (-9%) immediately after the pump peak — rapid exit behavior

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable=false provides metadata immutability assurance
  • Most snipers (15/20) are at a loss, reducing coordinated early-buyer dump pressure
  • Token is listed on PumpSwap with an accessible trading pair
  • 24h holder growth of +68 (+32%) shows the pump attracted new participants
  • Social links (Twitter, website, Moralis) suggest some level of project presence
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump: explosive price action on thin liquidity, dominant sell pressure, high concentration, and no fundamental backing. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than a negligible speculative allocation.

Bababoi (Bababoi) is a high-risk Solana meme token that has experienced a dramatic 498% pump in 24 hours on extremely thin liquidity. The token lacks fundamental backing, has an unverified contract, unknown authority status, and a highly concentrated holder base. The dominant sell pressure and immediate post-peak reversal suggest the pump is likely exhausting. Any investment thesis is purely speculative and momentum-based, with the bear case being the most probable outcome.

Bull case (low)

Viral social media traction (Twitter/website) drives a second wave of retail FOMO, new liquidity is added to the pool, and the token establishes a higher base above $0.000132, potentially retesting the $0.000247–$0.000274 pump highs.

  • Sustained viral social media campaign driving new buyer inflows
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting speculative appetite
  • Whale accumulation at current levels creating a price floor
  • New liquidity providers deepening the pool and reducing slippage risk

Base case

The token retraces 60–80% from its pump peak, settling in the $0.000063–$0.000090 range as the initial pump excitement fades. A small residual holder base (~100–150 wallets) remains, with occasional low-volume trading. The token neither recovers to pump highs nor goes to zero immediately, but slowly bleeds value over days to weeks.

  • Sell pressure gradually normalizes but remains elevated
  • No major new catalyst or liquidity injection
  • A subset of holders (likely the 98 'whales' in the distribution) hold their positions
  • Liquidity remains thin, keeping the token tradeable but highly illiquid

Bear case (high)

Sell pressure continues to dominate, the $0.000063 support breaks, and the token retraces fully to the pre-pump base of ~$0.000060 or lower. With 82.28% of supply in the top 100 wallets and dominant sell flow, a 80–90% drawdown from the pump peak is plausible.

  • Continued dominant sell pressure (64.3% of 24h volume)
  • Thin liquidity amplifying downside price impact
  • Rapid holder exit behavior (-19 holders in 1h post-peak)
  • Most snipers underwater with no incentive to hold
  • No fundamental catalyst or project utility to attract long-term holders

GeneratedMay 26, 09:47 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of approximately 21:00–21:30 UTC on May 26, 2026. OHLC data covers the most recent 10 hourly candles. Holder historical data covers the last 30 days (daily granularity). Sniper data covers the first 1,000 blocks post-launch.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, mutability)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (JAmA6B77hrusBtW8RHRj46MrY7iN2Tnynk98ELW5uThd)
  • Hourly OHLC price candles (10 candles, May 26 2026)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data (212 holders, top 20 balances)
  • 30-day historical holder time series (daily)
  • Sniper analysis (20 snipers, first 1,000 blocks)
  • Moralis token analytics platform

Limitations

  • Only 10 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis or pattern identification
  • Sniper sniped amounts and current balances are 'unknown', limiting precise sniper concentration calculation
  • Mint authority and freeze authority status are unconfirmed — rug risk from authorities cannot be fully assessed
  • Update authority is listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm renouncement
  • No project description, whitepaper, or tokenomics documentation available
  • Token launch date is not explicitly provided — token age cannot be confirmed
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($308,516) and trading analytics ($282,810) suggests price data may have slight timing differences
  • OHLC data appears to have L/H fields potentially swapped in some candles (L > H in candles 1–3), which may indicate a data feed anomaly

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply847,322,324.77

Key Risks

Extreme price volatility — 498% pump followed by immediate reversal signals unsustainable price action
Critically thin liquidity ($45.57K) making exit nearly impossible at scale without severe slippage
Dominant sell pressure: 287 unique sellers vs 85 buyers; 731 sell txns vs 245 buy txns in 24h
High supply concentration: top 100 wallets hold 82.28% of supply

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Medium risk

20 snipers were identified in the first 1,000 blocks. Of the 20 snipers with known PnL data, 15 show negative realized PnL (ranging from -6.8% to -65.6%), 3 show positive PnL (notably sniper 15 at +644.9% and sniper 13 at +44.3%), and 2 are near breakeven. The majority of snipers are at a loss, suggesting the token launched at a price that was already elevated relative to where it subsequently traded before the recent pump. The one outlier at +644.9% likely sold into the pump. Several snipers show $0 sold with negative PnL, meaning they are holding underwater positions. Sell-through rate is moderate — roughly half the snipers have sold some or all of their position.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration2.40%
PnL stateMostly At Loss
Sell-through rateModerate
Profit-taking risk
medium

20 snipers identified in the first 1,000 blocks; individual balances are unknown, but estimated aggregate sniper holdings are a small fraction of total supply (~2–4% estimated). Most snipers appear to have sold or hold minimal balances.

Mixed to negative. Most early snipers are underwater on realized PnL, with several deeply negative (-44% to -65%). Only 2–3 snipers are meaningfully in profit. The +644.9% outlier (sniper 15, sold $20) likely caught the pump but the small dollar amount suggests a small position. Overall early buyer sentiment is cautious to negative.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for 巴巴博一 (Bababoi)?

The token has already pumped ~498% in 24h and is showing early signs of reversal: the most recent hourly candle (21:00 UTC) closed at $0.0000630 — well below its open of $0.000132 — and sell pressure dominates at 64.3%. The 1h price change is already -2.84%. A retracement toward the pre-pump base (~$0.000060–$0.000063) is the most probable near-term outcome given the sell-heavy order flow and thin liquidity. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000060 to $0.000275.

Is Bababoi a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump: explosive price action on thin liquidity, dominant sell pressure, high concentration, and no fundamental backing. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than a negligible speculative allocation.

How are Bababoi holders trending?

巴巴博一 currently has 212 holders and is growing (24h: 32, 7d: 30, 30d: 26). Holder growth appears entirely pump-driven rather than organic. The 30-day historical data shows a declining trend from ~184 holders (May 7) to ~144 (May 25) — a loss of ~40 holders over 18 days. The 24h surge of +68 holders reversed this trend dramatically, but the immediate -19 holder drop in the most recent hour signals rapid exit behavior. Growth is technically 'accelerating' in the 24h window due to the pump, but the underlying organic trend was negative. The distribution skews heavily toward whales (98) and dolphins (69), with relatively few fish (27) and octopus (11), suggesting the holder base is dominated by larger positions rather than broad retail adoption.

What does sniper activity look like for Bababoi?

Snipers hold roughly 2.40% of supply with PnL state "mostly_at_loss" and sell-through rate "moderate". Profit-taking risk: medium.

What are the key risks of holding Bababoi?

Extreme price volatility — 498% pump followed by immediate reversal signals unsustainable price action • Critically thin liquidity ($45.57K) making exit nearly impossible at scale without severe slippage • Dominant sell pressure: 287 unique sellers vs 85 buyers; 731 sell txns vs 245 buy txns in 24h

Track Bababoi