Milk Dragon Nailong Price Today & AI Analysis

奶龙SolanaAnalysis as of Sep 14, 2026

$0.0₅2131

Contract

Live

DfFsUA5HBM8KfmNp2CXiMJAYgD1NRB6Gs5qAHBptpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

Market cap

$2,130

At a $1M market cap, $奶龙 would be $0.001000 (469x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is 奶龙 a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 28

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about 奶龙

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

MINMAXMINMAX ONE$0.0₅2224+0.0%MC $2.2K

PULTCatapult Trade$0.0₅2180+0.0%MC $218.0K KKENZOWATCH THE CLIP U NGAS$0.0₅2037+2.2%MC $2.0K

KOJOKojo The Squirrel$0.0₅2566+0.0%MC $2.4K

𝕏Money𝕏 Money$0.0₅6823+0.0%MC $6.8K

MPLXMetaplex$0.0670+36.4%MC $31.56M

Milk Dragon Nailong: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-14 10:19 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$93,225.00

How concentrated is Milk Dragon Nailong ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Milk Dragon Nailong?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Milk Dragon Nailong liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-14 10:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $93,225.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-14 10:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 14, 10:19 AM UTC

FDV

$4,840,632

Liquidity

$93,225.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Milk Dragon Nailong (奶龙) is a meme token launched via pump.fun and now trading on PumpSwap, currently priced at $0.00484 after an extreme reported 24h gain of over 11,250%. The token shows a $4.84M fully diluted valuation against only $93.22K in total liquidity, with strong but narrow-window buy-side dominance (85.5% buy volume vs 14.5% sell). Critical risk-assessment data — holder distribution, whale concentration, sniper activity, and mint/freeze authority status — is entirely unavailable, making this an extremely high-uncertainty, high-risk speculative token.

Key points

Extreme parabolic 24h price move (+11,250%) on very thin liquidity ($93.22K)
Self-reported fee-distributor mechanism claiming to route creator fees to holders, unverified
Complete absence of holder, whale, and sniper data, unusual gaps that prevent standard risk verification
Broad-based 24h participation (2,965 buyers vs 2,725 sellers) despite the extreme price move

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

Given the parabolic 24h move (+11,250%) coupled with sharply declining volume in the most recent candle (down ~88% from the peak hour), short-term price action is likely to either consolidate near current levels ($0.0046-0.0049) or face a corrective pullback as early buyers take profit. The high buy-pressure reading (85.5%) could sustain a push slightly higher, but thin liquidity ($93.22K) makes both continuation and reversal moves exaggerated.

Target low

$0.0035

Target high

$0.0060

Support: $0.0046515, $0.00389
Resistance: $0.0048456, $0.0060 (psychological/extension level)

Medium term · 3-14 days

bearish

Meme tokens exhibiting this magnitude of single-day gain on pump.fun-derived liquidity pools historically tend to retrace a significant portion of the spike as speculative momentum fades and initial buyers exit, especially with only $93.22K in liquidity unable to support sustained demand at these valuations. Without verified holder distribution or sniper data to confirm broad, sticky ownership, the base case leans toward mean reversion.

Catalysts

Potential liquidity additions or removals by the creator/LPs
Continued social/community momentum (untracked — no social links currently listed)
Profit-taking by early buyers/snipers if concentrated positions exist (unverifiable currently)
Broader Solana meme-coin market sentiment shifts

Bullish factors

Strong 24h buy pressure (85.5% of volume) with more buyers (2,965) than sellers (2,725)
Broad participation across thousands of unique wallets rather than a single dominant actor
Active, functioning trading pair on PumpSwap despite thin liquidity

Bearish factors

Extreme, likely unsustainable +11,250% 24h price move consistent with blow-off top patterns
Sharp volume decline (~88%) across the last 3 hours despite continued price appreciation — bearish divergence
Very thin liquidity ($93.22K) relative to $4.84M FDV, unable to support sustained buying without high slippage
No verifiable holder, whale, or sniper data to rule out concentrated dump risk
Unknown mint/freeze authority and contract verification status leave rug-pull risk unconfirmed

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to only 3 hourly candles being available, complete absence of holder/whale/sniper data, unknown contract authority status, and the inherently unpredictable nature of meme-token price action following an extreme parabolic move. Any prediction here is directional and illustrative rather than a precise quantitative forecast.

奶龙 call history

Full track record →

Sep 14neutral@ $0.00484

24h—

7d—

30d-100.0%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: DfFsUA...pump
Total Supply: 999,531,918.22 (formatted)

Key Risks

Extreme, likely unsustainable price spike (+11,250% in 24h) typical of pump-and-dump patterns
Shallow liquidity ($93.22K) relative to $4.84M FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk
No verifiable holder/whale concentration data — concentration risk unknown but presumed high
No sniper/early-buyer data available to assess dump risk from bots

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (08:00 UTC) shows an explosive move from open $0.0000417 to close $0.00389 (high=close), a ~9,230% single-hour gain on volume of $82.25K — an extreme bullish marubozu-like candle with no upper wick, indicating relentless buying with no pullback. Candle 2 (09:00) continued higher, opening at $0.00389 and closing at $0.00465 (high=close again), on lower volume ($33.28K), still fully bullish with no wick, showing sustained but decelerating momentum. Candle 3 (10:00) shows clear deceleration: open $0.00465, high $0.004846, low $0.0046515, close $0.0048426 — a small-bodied candle with a minor upper wick and tiny lower wick, volume collapsing to $9.77K (an ~88% drop from candle 1), suggesting momentum exhaustion after the initial parabolic spike.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Short-term trend remains up across all 3 candles, but the sharp volume decline (from $82.25K to $9.77K) and narrowing candle range in the most recent hour signal the initial vertical move is losing steam. With only 3 hours of data, medium-term trend cannot be reliably established beyond noting the overall move originated from near-zero levels.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

86%

Sell

15%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0046515 (candle 3 low)

Major support

$0.0000417 (candle 1 open, pre-spike base)

Immediate resistance

$0.0048456 (candle 3 high)

Major resistance

$0.00484-0.00490 area (current all-time high zone, untested above)

With only 3 candles, support/resistance levels are provisional. Immediate support sits at the candle 3 low of $0.0046515; a break below could trigger fast downside back toward the candle 2 open near $0.00389. Immediate resistance is the current high of $0.0048456; a decisive break above with renewed volume would be needed to confirm continuation rather than exhaustion. The pre-spike base near $0.0000417 represents the token's prior trading range and would be a severe downside level if the entire move unwinds.

Notable patterns

Marubozu-style bullish candles (candles 1 and 2) with no upper wicks, indicating one-directional buying with no intra-hour selling pressure
Sharp volume decay across the 3-candle window (~88% decline), a bearish divergence against continued price appreciation
Candle 3 shows a small-bodied, narrow-range candle after two large expansion candles — consistent with early-stage momentum exhaustion or consolidation atop a parabolic move

Liquidity

$93,225.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $93.22K against a fully diluted valuation of $4.84M represents extremely thin market depth relative to token valuation (liquidity/FDV ratio under 2%). This means even moderate-sized trades can cause outsized price impact — consistent with the extreme 1h (+17.5%) and 24h (+11,250%) price swings observed. 24h buy volume ($98.54K) outweighs sell volume ($16.70K) by roughly 5.9x, and buy pressure sits at 85.5% vs 14.5% sell pressure, with more unique buyers (2,965) than sellers (2,725). This signals a strong net inflow and aggressive speculative buying, but such imbalances in a shallow pool are also classic conditions preceding sharp reversals once early buyers begin taking profit. Slippage risk is high given the pool size.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,531,918.22 (formatted)

FDV

$4,840,632

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved over 11,250% in 24h and +17.5% in the last hour alone, with candle 1 showing a move from $0.0000417 to $0.00389 within a single hour — this is extreme, parabolic, low-liquidity price action typical of freshly launched pump.fun tokens, not sustainable organic growth.
Liquidityhigh
Only $93.22K total liquidity against a $4.84M FDV creates a very high risk of slippage and price collapse if any meaningfully sized holder exits.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme, likely unsustainable price spike (+11,250% in 24h) typical of pump-and-dump patterns
Shallow liquidity ($93.22K) relative to $4.84M FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk
No verifiable holder/whale concentration data — concentration risk unknown but presumed high
No sniper/early-buyer data available to assess dump risk from bots
Mint/freeze authority and contract verification status all unknown, leaving rug-pull vectors unconfirmed
Self-reported tokenomics claims (fee distributor, no creator claim) are unverified marketing statements from an adversarial/unknown creator
No social links provided, reducing ability to verify legitimacy or community engagement

Mitigating factors

24h buy pressure (85.5%) currently exceeds sell pressure (14.5%), suggesting net demand rather than active mass exit at this moment
More unique buyers (2,965) than sellers (2,725) in 24h, indicating broad participation rather than a single whale-driven pump
Token trades on PumpSwap with an active, liquid-enough pair to support tens of thousands of daily transactions

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly speculative, risk-tolerant traders explicitly seeking short-term momentum plays on newly launched meme tokens, and only with position sizing that assumes total loss of capital is possible. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking fundamental value exposure, or anyone unable to verify contract authorities and holder distribution independently before entry.

Milk Dragon Nailong (奶龙) is a pump.fun-origin meme token on PumpSwap that has experienced an extreme, likely unsustainable 24h price surge (+11,250%) on relatively thin liquidity ($93.22K) against a $4.84M FDV. Current order flow shows strong net buying pressure (85.5% buy vs 14.5% sell) with broad participation (2,965 buyers vs 2,725 sellers in 24h), but critical risk data — holder concentration, whale distribution, sniper activity, and contract authority status — is entirely unavailable, making this a high-uncertainty, high-risk speculative bet rather than a fundamentally analyzable investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued viral/meme momentum and sustained buy pressure push price higher as new buyers pile in, with the fee-distributor mechanism (if legitimate) creating an incentive loop for holders to stay in rather than sell.

Sustained buy-side dominance (85.5% buy volume share) could continue attracting momentum traders
Broad buyer participation (2,965 unique buyers in 24h) suggests more than a single-actor pump
Meme-coin virality on Solana/PumpSwap can occasionally sustain multi-day rallies if narrative and community engagement grow

Base Case

Price remains highly volatile with elevated but decelerating gains or a partial retracement as initial momentum fades, buy/sell pressure gradually normalizes, and liquidity remains a binding constraint on any large directional move.

No major exogenous catalyst (listing, influencer promotion, etc.) sustains the current buy-pressure imbalance indefinitely
Liquidity providers do not meaningfully deepen the pool in the near term
Absence of verified authority/holder data continues to suppress institutional or larger-wallet participation, keeping the token in a retail-speculative regime

Bear Case

High probability

The +11,250% 24h move is a classic thin-liquidity pump that reverses sharply as early buyers and any concentrated holders (unverified but presumed likely) take profit into a $93.22K liquidity pool, causing a fast, deep price collapse.

Liquidity of only $93.22K cannot absorb meaningful sell pressure without severe price impact
Unknown mint/freeze authority and unverified contract status leave open the possibility of adversarial control
No verifiable holder distribution data — high concentration must be assumed as a base case for very new pump.fun tokens
Extreme parabolic candle action (e.g., hour 1 moving from $0.0000417 to $0.00389) is a hallmark of unsustainable speculative spikes

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 14, 10:19 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-14 10:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, description)
USD price and 24h/1h/5m percent change data
Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent hours)
Trading analytics: liquidity, buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No holder distribution or whale concentration data available — holder endpoints retired
No sniper/early-buyer data available — endpoint returned empty
Only 3 hourly OHLC candles provided, insufficient for robust multi-day technical analysis
Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, mutability, and update authority all unknown
Token metadata (name, description, fee-distributor claims) is self-reported by an unverified/potentially adversarial creator and not independently confirmed
6h price change data was unavailable

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially unavailable on-chain data and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency trading, especially in newly launched, low-liquidity meme tokens, carries a very high risk of substantial or total loss. Always conduct independent due diligence and verify contract authorities, liquidity, and holder distribution through live on-chain tools before trading.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Milk Dragon Nailong (奶龙) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Milk Dragon Nailong (奶龙)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Milk Dragon Nailong ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Milk Dragon Nailong?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Milk Dragon Nailong liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-14 10:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $93,225.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Milk Dragon Nailong (奶龙)?

Is 奶龙 a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly speculative, risk-tolerant traders explicitly seeking short-term momentum plays on newly launched meme tokens, and only with position sizing that assumes total loss of capital is possible. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking fundamental value exposure, or anyone unable to verify contract authorities and holder distribution independently before entry.

What are the key risks of holding 奶龙?

Extreme, likely unsustainable price spike (+11,250% in 24h) typical of pump-and-dump patterns • Shallow liquidity ($93.22K) relative to $4.84M FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk • No verifiable holder/whale concentration data — concentration risk unknown but presumed high