jelly-my-jelly Price Today & AI Analysis

jellyjellySolanaAnalysis as of Apr 30, 2026

$0.0494

-1.96% 24h

Contract

Live

FeR8VBqNRSUD5NtXAj2n3j1dAHkZHfyDktKuLXD4pump

Chain

Solana

Holders

33,919

Market cap

$49,352,198

At a $100M market cap, $JELLYJELLY would be $0.1000 (2.03x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is jellyjelly a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 26

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Creator holds

1.8%

Much of the trading comes from a farm of related wallets.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about jellyjelly

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

WingSlopWingstop Sour Patch Kids Wings$0.0₄2084-15.3%MC $19.9K

TokabuThe Spirit of Gambling$0.001635-6.3%MC $1.63M

CARSRip Cars$0.1072-3.8%MC $4.15M

MEMagic Eden$0.0603-3.2%MC $60.34M

KLEDKLEDAI$0.0126-7.0%MC $12.58M

ZECZcash$1,219.15+0.6%MC $125.45M

jelly-my-jelly: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-04-30 00:50 UTC

Holder addresses

33,636

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$4,232,932.80

How concentrated is jelly-my-jelly ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 33,636 addresses (2026-04-30 00:50 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling jelly-my-jelly?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is jelly-my-jelly liquidity falling?: As of 2026-04-30 00:50 UTC, reported liquidity was $4,232,932.80. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-04-30 00:50 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Apr 30, 12:50 AM UTC

FDV

$52,230,849

Liquidity

$4,232,932.80

Holders

33,636

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Neutral

jellyjelly (jelly-my-jelly) is a Solana meme token with mint address FeR8VBqNRSUD5NtXAj2n3j1dAHkZHfyDktKuLXD4pump, trading at ~$0.0522 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$52.2M. The token has 33,636 holders, $4.23M in liquidity on Raydium, and has been experiencing a slow but steady decline in holder count over the past 30 days (-211 holders, -0.63%). Supply concentration is extremely high — the top 10 wallets hold 72.06% and the top 100 hold 97.84% of supply — representing the most significant structural risk. No snipers were detected in the first 1,000 blocks, which is a positive signal. The token is verified, non-spam, and the metadata is immutable.

Key points

No sniper activity detected in first 1,000 blocks — clean launch
Verified contract, non-spam, immutable metadata (mutable: false)
Substantial liquidity of $4.23M on Raydium for a meme token
Fully diluted valuation of ~$52.2M with ~$0.0522 price
Extremely high supply concentration: top 10 hold 72.06%, top 100 hold 97.84%

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24–72 hours

neutral

Price has been consolidating in a tight range between ~$0.0508 and ~$0.0558 over the past 24 hours. After a sharp sell-off from the $0.0554–$0.0558 zone (candles 9–16), price has stabilized near $0.0522. Buy/sell pressure is nearly balanced (49.2% buy vs 50.8% sell), suggesting a short-term sideways to mildly bearish bias. Immediate support sits at ~$0.0508 (intraday low, candle 9) and resistance at ~$0.0528 (recent hourly highs).

Target low

$0.0490

Target high

$0.0558

Support: $0.0508 (intraday low, candle 9), $0.0519 (cluster of closes, candles 2–3), $0.0490 (psychological round level)
Resistance: $0.0528 (recent hourly highs, candles 1–5), $0.0558 (24h high, candle 16), $0.0584 (session peak, candle 16 wick)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

The 30-day holder trend is declining (-211 holders, -0.63%), and supply concentration remains dangerously high. Without a new catalyst or community growth driver, selling pressure from large holders could push price lower. The token's meme nature means sentiment-driven pumps are possible but not predictable.

Catalysts

New exchange listing or partnership announcement
Broader Solana meme coin market rally
Whale accumulation at lower price levels
Viral social media moment driving new buyer inflow

Bullish factors

No sniper activity — clean launch with no early dump risk from snipers
Verified contract and immutable metadata reduce rug risk
$4.23M liquidity provides meaningful depth for a meme token
Price has held above $0.0508 support despite 24h selling pressure
1h price change is +0.56%, suggesting short-term stabilization

Bearish factors

Top 10 holders control 72.06% of supply — extreme concentration risk
Holder count declining for 30 consecutive days net (-211 holders)
24h sell volume ($341.84K) slightly exceeds buy volume ($331.44K)
FDV of $52.2M is high relative to meme token fundamentals
Price down -2.13% over 24h on the analytics feed
Update authority not renounced (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM)

Confidence: low. Meme tokens are highly sentiment-driven and difficult to predict. The near-balanced buy/sell pressure and tight price range reduce short-term directional conviction. The 30-day declining holder trend and extreme concentration add medium-term bearish weight, but a single viral event could reverse this rapidly.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: FeR8VB...pump
Total Supply: 999,966,796.545616

Key Risks

Extreme supply concentration: top 10 hold 72.06%, single wallet holds 32.47% — any large holder exit could crash price
Persistent 30-day holder decline (-211 holders, -0.63%) with no reversal signal
Update authority not renounced; mint/freeze authority status unknown
Meme token with no stated utility — entirely sentiment-dependent valuation

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the most recent 24 hourly candles (Apr 29 01:00 UTC to Apr 30 00:00 UTC), jellyjelly opened near $0.0526 and experienced a notable rally into the $0.0554–$0.0584 zone (candles 9–16, roughly 08:00–17:00 UTC), before selling off sharply back to the $0.0508–$0.0522 range. Candle 11 (14:00 UTC) shows the highest volume at ~$105K and a large upper wick from $0.0554 to $0.0548 close — a bearish shooting star / reversal candle. Candles 12–13 show narrow-range doji-like behavior near $0.0550–$0.0551, confirming indecision at the top. The subsequent decline (candles 9–7) shows lower closes, and the final candles (1–6) show stabilization near $0.0519–$0.0523 with declining volume.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is down from the intraday high of ~$0.0584 (candle 16 wick) to current ~$0.0522. Medium-term the token is range-bound between ~$0.0490 and $0.0584, with no clear directional breakout.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

49%

Sell

51%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0519 (cluster of recent closes, candles 2–3, 10)

Major support

$0.0508 (intraday low, candle 9)

Immediate resistance

$0.0528 (recent hourly highs, candles 4–5)

Major resistance

$0.0558 (24h high zone, candles 12–16)

The $0.0508 level is the key support to watch — a break below this could accelerate selling toward $0.0490. On the upside, $0.0558 is the major resistance from the intraday high cluster. The $0.0519–$0.0523 zone is acting as near-term equilibrium.

Notable patterns

Bearish shooting star / high-volume reversal candle at 14:00 UTC (candle 11, ~$105K volume, large upper wick)
Doji cluster at the top (candles 12–13) confirming indecision near $0.0550–$0.0551
Volume climax followed by sharp volume decline — classic distribution pattern
Price stabilization / base-building in the $0.0519–$0.0523 zone over the last 6 candles
Lower highs forming from candle 16 ($0.0584 wick) through candle 1 ($0.0523) — short-term downtrend structure

Liquidity

$4,232,932.80

Depth

Moderate

Slippage risk

Medium

The token has $4.23M in total liquidity on Raydium (pair: 3bC2e2RxcfvF9oP22LvbaNsVwoS2T98q6ErCRoayQYdq), which is moderate for a meme token at this market cap tier. The liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 8.1% ($4.23M / $52.1M), which is reasonable. 24h trading activity shows 1,185 buys vs 1,370 sells, with 120 unique buyers and 139 unique sellers — a mild net outflow. Total 24h volume is approximately $673K ($331K buy + $342K sell), representing about 1.3% of FDV daily turnover, which is healthy for a meme token. Slippage risk is medium — while $4.23M is meaningful liquidity, the extreme supply concentration means a large holder dump could rapidly drain the pool. The 185 unique wallets trading in 24h indicates moderate but not exceptional community engagement.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,966,796.545616

FDV

$52,230,849.23

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Meme token with no fundamental backing. 24h price range spans from $0.0508 to $0.0584 (~14.9% intraday range). Susceptible to rapid sentiment-driven moves in either direction.
Liquiditymedium
$4.23M liquidity on Raydium is moderate for this market cap tier. However, if top holders begin selling, liquidity could be rapidly depleted. Slippage risk increases significantly for trades above ~$50K.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme supply concentration: top 10 hold 72.06%, single wallet holds 32.47% — any large holder exit could crash price
Persistent 30-day holder decline (-211 holders, -0.63%) with no reversal signal
Update authority not renounced; mint/freeze authority status unknown
Meme token with no stated utility — entirely sentiment-dependent valuation
FDV of $52.2M may be difficult to sustain without continuous new buyer inflow
Multiple wallets with round-number allocations suggest insider/team holdings that could be unlocked

Mitigating factors

Zero sniper activity — cleanest possible launch profile
Verified contract, non-spam classification
Immutable metadata (mutable: false) prevents post-launch metadata manipulation
$4.23M liquidity provides meaningful buffer against small-to-medium sell pressure
33,636 holders provides a broad base of community participants
Price has held above $0.0508 support despite net selling pressure

Suitable for

Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant investors with significant experience in Solana meme tokens. Position sizing should be small relative to portfolio. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking fundamental value, or those unable to monitor positions actively. Any investment should be treated as speculative with full loss potential.

jellyjelly is a pump.fun-originated Solana meme token with a clean launch (no snipers), moderate liquidity ($4.23M), and a verified contract. However, it faces severe structural headwinds from extreme supply concentration (top 10 = 72.06%), a persistent 30-day holder decline, and a fully diluted valuation of $52.2M that requires continuous new demand to sustain. The token is best characterized as a high-risk speculative play on meme coin sentiment within the Solana ecosystem.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A viral social media moment, influencer endorsement, or broader Solana meme coin market rally drives a surge of new buyers. The clean launch profile and verified contract attract attention from quality-focused meme coin communities. Holder count reverses and grows rapidly, price breaks above $0.0558 resistance and targets $0.08–$0.10 range.

Viral social media catalyst (Twitter/X, TikTok)
Broader Solana meme season rally lifting all boats
New exchange listing (CEX) driving volume and awareness
Whale accumulation from the $0.0508–$0.0519 support zone
Community-driven utility or narrative development

Base Case

Price continues to trade in the $0.0490–$0.0558 range with moderate volatility. Holder count continues to slowly decline at the current pace (-0.63%/month). Volume remains in the $500K–$1M/day range on active days. The token maintains its current market position without a major catalyst in either direction.

No major holder distribution events in the near term
Broader Solana market remains stable
Community engagement holds at current levels (~185 unique wallets/day)
Liquidity remains above $3M on Raydium
No new viral catalyst emerges to drive significant price movement

Bear Case

Medium probability

One or more of the top 10 holders (collectively controlling 72.06% of supply) begins distributing. The persistent holder decline accelerates, liquidity is drained, and price collapses below $0.0490 support toward $0.02–$0.03 range. The meme narrative fades without a new catalyst.

Large holder(s) begin selling — 32.47% single-wallet overhang is existential risk
Continued holder attrition accelerates beyond current -0.63%/month pace
Broader crypto market downturn reduces risk appetite for meme tokens
Competing meme tokens capture community attention and liquidity
Update authority executes adverse action (low probability but non-zero)

Analysis details

Generated

Apr 30, 12:50 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-04-30 00:50 UTC

Model confidence

Medium

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, update authority, mutability)
Raydium DEX price feed and OHLC candle data (hourly, 24 candles)
Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets, price changes across timeframes)
Holder metrics and distribution data (top 20 holders, holder count history 30 days)
Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
Historical holder series (daily, 30 days: Mar 31 – Apr 29, 2026)

Limitations

Mint authority and freeze authority status could not be definitively confirmed from provided metadata — marked as unknown
Sniper data shows 0 snipers but total sniped USD and transaction count are listed as unknown — cannot fully verify
Top holder wallet classifications are inferred from balance patterns and known addresses; definitive classification requires additional on-chain investigation
30-day OHLC history not provided — medium-term technical analysis is limited to 24-hour hourly data
No order book depth data available — slippage estimates are approximations
Social sentiment data (Reddit, website, Moralis links) not analyzed — qualitative community assessment is limited
FDV assumes full circulating supply; actual circulating supply may differ if tokens are locked

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is jelly-my-jelly (jellyjelly) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below. Much of the trading comes from a farm of related wallets. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell jelly-my-jelly (jellyjelly)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is jelly-my-jelly ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 33,636 addresses (2026-04-30 00:50 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling jelly-my-jelly?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is jelly-my-jelly liquidity falling?

As of 2026-04-30 00:50 UTC, reported liquidity was $4,232,932.80. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for jelly-my-jelly (jellyjelly)?

Is jellyjelly a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as high with a risk score of 7.5/100. Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant investors with significant experience in Solana meme tokens. Position sizing should be small relative to portfolio. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking fundamental value, or those unable to monitor positions actively. Any investment should be treated as speculative with full loss potential.

What are the key risks of holding jellyjelly?

Extreme supply concentration: top 10 hold 72.06%, single wallet holds 32.47% — any large holder exit could crash price • Persistent 30-day holder decline (-211 holders, -0.63%) with no reversal signal • Update authority not renounced; mint/freeze authority status unknown