Ensum

Ensum Price Prediction 2026

Ensum
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 18, 2026

DQLiiYdmusjfBD45BWtrneFkMoNS1udAVpU3x4zXpump

$0.051560

FDV $1,558

LiveContract:DQLiiYdmusjfBD45BWtrneFkMoNS1udAVpU3x4zXpumpChain:SolanaHolders:129Market cap:$1,558

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Ensum

Report snapshotas of Jun 18, 04:17 AM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$40,084

Holders

647

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Ensum (Ensum) is an unverified Solana token minted at DQLiiYdmusjfBD45BWtrneFkMoNS1udAVpU3x4zXpump with a total supply of 1 (indivisible, 0 decimals), trading at ~$0.000108 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$108K. The token launched on PumpSwap and has experienced a dramatic 147% 24h price spike, but is accompanied by overwhelming sell pressure (72.2% sell volume), extremely thin liquidity ($40K), and a highly anomalous holder history — flat at 15 holders for nearly a month before an explosive +620 holder surge in the last 24 hours. The contract is unverified, mutable, and update authority is unknown. These signals collectively point to a very high-risk speculative asset with significant manipulation and rug-pull indicators.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Total supply of exactly 1 token with 0 decimals — an extremely unusual tokenomic structure
Holder count was frozen at exactly 15 for ~30 days, then surged +620 in 24 hours — highly anomalous
72.2% sell pressure vs 27.8% buy pressure despite a 147% 24h price pump
Mutable contract with unknown update authority — elevated rug risk
No top holder data available and supply concentration reported as 0% — data gap raises red flags
Liquidity of only $40K against $108K FDV — shallow and easily manipulated

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token just printed a massive 147% pump candle but is now showing a sharp reversal: the most recent hourly candle (04:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000793, spiked to $0.0001237, then collapsed to close at $0.0000231 — a severe bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern. The 5-minute price change is already -5.4%. With 72.2% sell pressure and 3,548 sells vs 1,310 buys in 24h, the short-term outlook is strongly bearish.

Target low$0.000018
Target high$0.000108
Support: $0.0000231 (recent hourly close), $0.0000181 (hourly low from 03:00 candle)
Resistance: $0.0000815 (03:00 candle close), $0.0001237 (04:00 candle high / all-time high in data)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Given the thin liquidity ($40K), overwhelming sell pressure, anomalous holder history, and lack of verified fundamentals, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. The pump appears to be a short-lived speculative event. Without new catalysts or liquidity injection, price is likely to drift toward or below the pre-pump range.

Catalysts
  • Any new liquidity injection or exchange listing could temporarily reverse trend
  • Continued sell-off by early holders could accelerate decline
  • Mutable contract changes could trigger panic selling

Bullish factors

  • 147% 24h price surge demonstrates speculative momentum exists
  • Rapid holder growth (+620 in 24h) could indicate viral attention
  • PumpSwap listing provides some accessibility

Bearish factors

  • 72.2% sell pressure — sellers vastly outnumber buyers (3,548 sells vs 1,310 buys)
  • Most recent hourly candle shows a shooting star / bearish reversal from $0.0001237 high to $0.0000231 close
  • Only $40K liquidity — any moderate sell order causes severe slippage
  • Holder count was static at 15 for 30 days — suggests artificial or dormant token
  • Unverified, mutable contract with unknown update authority
  • No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed
Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, providing minimal technical basis. The token's anomalous structure (supply=1, 0 decimals, frozen holder count) makes standard price modeling unreliable. Confidence is low due to data scarcity and extreme manipulation signals.

Ensum call history

Full track record →
Jun 18bearish
24h-95.5%
7d-97.8%
30d-98.4%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (03:00 UTC): O=$0.0000231, H=$0.0001029, L=$0.0000181, C=$0.0000815 — a strong bullish candle with a long lower wick, suggesting a bounce from lows. Candle [1] (04:00 UTC): O=$0.0000793, H=$0.0001237, L=$0.0000701, C=$0.0000231 — a classic shooting star / bearish engulfing pattern. Price opened near the prior close, surged to a new high of $0.0001237, then collapsed to close at $0.0000231, near the session low. This is a textbook bearish reversal signal after the pump.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 28%Sell 72%

The short-term trend has reversed sharply bearish after the pump candle. The most recent close ($0.0000231) is significantly below the prior close ($0.0000815), confirming a downtrend in the immediate term. Medium-term is effectively sideways given the token was dormant for ~30 days prior.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000231 (04:00 UTC candle close / recent low close)
Major$0.0000181 (03:00 UTC candle absolute low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000815 (03:00 UTC candle close)
Major$0.0001237 (04:00 UTC candle high — all-time high in available data)

The $0.0000181–$0.0000231 zone represents the most recent support cluster. A break below $0.0000181 would signal further downside with no visible support. Resistance at $0.0000815 (prior close) and $0.0001237 (pump high) would need significant buying pressure to reclaim.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing on the 04:00 UTC candle — classic pump-and-dump reversal signal
  • High-volume pump candle (03:00 UTC, 171K volume) followed by lower-volume distribution candle (04:00 UTC, 46K volume)
  • Price closed near session low on the most recent candle — bearish close
  • Long upper wick on 04:00 UTC candle indicates strong rejection at $0.0001237

Total holders647
24h Δ+620
7d Δ+632
30d Δ+632
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The explosive holder growth (+620 in 24h, +96%) is tightly correlated with the 147% price pump on June 18. However, this growth is almost entirely concentrated in the last 24 hours — the token had exactly 15 holders for the entire preceding 30-day period (May 19 – June 14), then 27 on June 16, 19 on June 17, and 647 at current count. This pattern is highly anomalous and suggests the holder surge is driven by the pump event rather than organic adoption.

The historical holder data reveals a deeply suspicious pattern: the token maintained exactly 15 holders with zero net change for approximately 30 consecutive days (May 19 – June 14, 2026). This is statistically improbable for an organically active token and strongly suggests the token was dormant, held by insiders, or artificially maintained. The sudden explosion to 647 holders (+632 over 30d, with +620 in the last 24h alone) coincides precisely with the price pump. The 7d and 30d growth figures are nearly identical (632 vs 632), confirming virtually all growth occurred in the last 24 hours. This pattern is consistent with a coordinated pump event designed to attract retail participants.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available from the data source

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token — no top 20 holders were returned, and supply concentration is reported as 0% for both top 10 and top 100. This is a significant data gap and itself a red flag. For a token with total supply of 1 (indivisible, 0 decimals), the concept of percentage concentration is mathematically unusual — the single token unit must be held by one address at any time, making standard concentration metrics meaningless. The distribution health is flagged as very_concentrated by default given the extreme tokenomic structure. The absence of holder data prevents any meaningful whale sentiment analysis. Investors should treat this data gap as a risk factor.

Liquidity$40,080
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$64,160
Sell$166,260
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers298
Unique sellers989

Liquidity is critically shallow at $40K against a $108K FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~37%, which sounds reasonable but in absolute terms means any trade above a few thousand dollars will cause severe slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: sell volume ($166K) is 2.59x buy volume ($64K), with 989 unique sellers vs only 298 unique buyers. The total 24h volume ($230K) is nearly 6x the total liquidity pool, indicating extremely high turnover relative to depth. This is a hallmark of a pump-and-dump scenario where liquidity is being drained. The pair trades on PumpSwap (8DG5R2sZMu7K9BXQkThYXyqG11k7xE2fqQnzVk5wHjrV), a permissionless DEX with no listing requirements.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1
FDV$108,000

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Ensum has an extraordinarily unusual tokenomic structure: total supply of exactly 1 token with 0 decimals, meaning the token is completely indivisible. This makes standard tokenomic analysis (percentage holdings, distribution curves) largely inapplicable. The contract is explicitly marked as unverified and mutable, with update authority listed as 'unknown' — this is a high-risk configuration as the contract could be modified post-deployment. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from available data, so both are marked unknown. The mutable flag combined with unknown update authority means the token's rules could theoretically be changed by whoever holds that authority. The FDV of $108K is entirely dependent on the current speculative price with no underlying utility or verified fundamentals. The PumpFun-style mint address suffix ('pump') is consistent with a PumpFun-launched token.

Volatility
high

147% price pump in 24h followed by an immediate shooting star reversal candle. The token swung from $0.0000181 to $0.0001237 and back to $0.0000231 within two hourly candles — extreme intraday volatility.

Liquidity
high

Only $40K total liquidity on a single PumpSwap pool. 24h volume ($230K) is ~5.7x the liquidity pool. Any meaningful exit will cause severe slippage and price impact.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is entirely unavailable. The token has a total supply of 1 indivisible unit, making concentration analysis structurally unusual. The 30-day dormancy with exactly 15 holders suggests insider concentration prior to the pump.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available. However, the pattern of 15 static holders for 30 days followed by a coordinated pump is consistent with insider accumulation and planned distribution. The 72.2% sell pressure supports active dumping.

Authority
high

Contract is mutable with unknown update authority. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. This configuration allows potential post-deployment modifications, freeze of holder accounts, or additional minting — all classic rug-pull vectors.

Key risks

  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or contract modification
  • Total supply of 1 indivisible token — highly unusual structure with no precedent for legitimate use cases
  • 30-day holder freeze at exactly 15 followed by sudden pump — strong manipulation signal
  • 72.2% sell pressure with 989 sellers vs 298 buyers — active distribution into retail
  • Shallow $40K liquidity — severe slippage risk on any meaningful trade
  • No top holder data available — cannot assess concentration or insider risk
  • Unverified contract with no description or whitepaper
  • Shooting star reversal candle at the pump high — technical breakdown in progress

Mitigating factors

  • Token is not flagged as spam by the data provider
  • Has social links (Twitter, Moralis) suggesting some level of community presence
  • PumpSwap listing provides basic DEX accessibility
  • Price has shown ability to generate significant short-term momentum (+147% in 24h)
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for total loss. The combination of manipulation signals, unknown authorities, thin liquidity, and anomalous tokenomics places this in the highest risk category.

Ensum presents as a high-risk speculative pump event on Solana's PumpSwap with no verified fundamentals, an anomalous tokenomic structure (supply=1, 0 decimals), and strong on-chain signals of coordinated manipulation. The 30-day dormancy followed by a sudden pump-and-dump pattern, combined with 72.2% sell pressure and unknown contract authorities, makes this an extremely dangerous asset. Any investment thesis must be grounded in pure speculation rather than fundamental value.

Bull case (low)

The pump attracts continued viral attention, new buyers overwhelm sellers, and the token achieves a higher FDV on sustained momentum. Early buyers who entered below $0.00005 could see significant short-term gains if momentum continues.

  • Viral social media attention driving new buyer inflows
  • Continued holder growth sustaining buy pressure
  • Broader Solana memecoin market momentum
  • Unique tokenomic structure (supply=1) becoming a novelty narrative

Base case

The token experiences continued volatility with gradual price decay as sell pressure outweighs new buyers. Price stabilizes somewhere in the $0.000020–$0.000060 range as speculative interest fades, with occasional pump attempts that fail to sustain new highs.

  • No rug pull or contract modification occurs
  • Some residual speculative interest maintains minimal trading activity
  • Liquidity remains at current shallow levels
  • No major exchange listing or partnership announcement

Bear case (high)

The pump has already peaked (shooting star at $0.0001237), insiders and early holders continue distributing, liquidity drains, and the price collapses back toward or below pre-pump levels (~$0.000018–$0.000044). The mutable contract could be exploited for a rug pull.

  • 72.2% sell pressure already dominating market structure
  • Shooting star reversal candle confirming distribution at the top
  • Thin $40K liquidity cannot absorb continued selling
  • Unknown contract authority could execute rug pull at any time
  • No fundamental value proposition or verified use case

GeneratedJun 18, 04:17 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of analysis time. OHLC data covers the 2 most recent hourly candles (03:00–05:00 UTC June 18, 2026). Historical holder data covers May 19 – June 17, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics
  • Hourly OHLC price candles (2 candles available)
  • Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
  • 24h trading volume and wallet analytics
  • Holder distribution and acquisition data

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No top holder data returned — whale map and concentration analysis severely limited
  • No sniper analysis data available — smart money signals based on indirect inference only
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status all unknown — authority risk cannot be precisely quantified
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates structural anomalies in standard tokenomic metrics
  • Supply concentration reported as 0% for top 10 and top 100 — likely a data artifact rather than true distribution
  • No description, whitepaper, or verified contract — fundamental analysis not possible
  • Price % change shown as 0% for 1h, 6h, and 24h in analytics despite 147% 24h change in price data — possible data inconsistency

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk of total loss. The analyst has no position in this token. All data is sourced from third-party providers and may contain errors or omissions. Past price performance does not guarantee future results. This token exhibits multiple high-risk signals and should be approached with extreme caution.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1

Key Risks

Mutable contract with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or contract modification
Total supply of 1 indivisible token — highly unusual structure with no precedent for legitimate use cases
30-day holder freeze at exactly 15 followed by sudden pump — strong manipulation signal
72.2% sell pressure with 989 sellers vs 298 buyers — active distribution into retail

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper analysis data was provided for Ensum. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper activity. However, the on-chain trading data tells a concerning story: 989 unique sellers vs 298 unique buyers in 24h, with sell volume ($166K) more than 2.5x buy volume ($64K). This distribution pattern is consistent with early holders or insiders distributing into retail buying pressure generated by the pump.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available for this token.

Cannot be determined from sniper data (unavailable). The anomalous holder history — exactly 15 holders for ~30 days followed by a sudden +620 surge — suggests the original 15 holders may have been insiders or bots who accumulated before the pump event.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Ensum (Ensum)?

The token just printed a massive 147% pump candle but is now showing a sharp reversal: the most recent hourly candle (04:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000793, spiked to $0.0001237, then collapsed to close at $0.0000231 — a severe bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern. The 5-minute price change is already -5.4%. With 72.2% sell pressure and 3,548 sells vs 1,310 buys in 24h, the short-term outlook is strongly bearish. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000018 to $0.000108.

Is Ensum a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for total loss. The combination of manipulation signals, unknown authorities, thin liquidity, and anomalous tokenomics places this in the highest risk category.

How are Ensum holders trending?

Ensum currently has 647 holders and is growing (24h: 620, 7d: 632, 30d: 632). The historical holder data reveals a deeply suspicious pattern: the token maintained exactly 15 holders with zero net change for approximately 30 consecutive days (May 19 – June 14, 2026). This is statistically improbable for an organically active token and strongly suggests the token was dormant, held by insiders, or artificially maintained. The sudden explosion to 647 holders (+632 over 30d, with +620 in the last 24h alone) coincides precisely with the price pump. The 7d and 30d growth figures are nearly identical (632 vs 632), confirming virtually all growth occurred in the last 24 hours. This pattern is consistent with a coordinated pump event designed to attract retail participants.

What does sniper activity look like for Ensum?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding Ensum?

Mutable contract with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or contract modification • Total supply of 1 indivisible token — highly unusual structure with no precedent for legitimate use cases • 30-day holder freeze at exactly 15 followed by sudden pump — strong manipulation signal

Track Ensum