fredward

fredward the duck Price Today & AI Analysis

fredward
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 21, 2026

D4QYDUW4AEbLS2Qz22iHuSKsT7X5QhKm25a5YYFejr8z

$0.053342

-0.95%

FDV $3,306

LiveContract:D4QYDUW4AEbLS2Qz22iHuSKsT7X5QhKm25a5YYFejr8zChain:SolanaHolders:288Market cap:$3,306

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about fredward

Report snapshotas of Jul 21, 04:17 PM
FDV

$136,084

Liquidity

$45,526

Holders

1,092

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

fredward the duck (FREDWARD) is a micro-cap Solana meme token trading at $0.000136 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$136K. The token launched on PumpSwap and has experienced an explosive but highly suspicious single-day holder surge of +1,008 holders (+92%) in the past 24 hours — after sitting completely dormant at 84 holders for the entire prior 30-day period. This pattern, combined with 92% sell pressure ($720.94K sells vs $62.92K buys), extremely shallow liquidity ($45.53K), and a -17.15% 24h price decline, raises serious red flags about coordinated activity, wash trading, or a pump-and-dump in progress.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive 92% holder growth in 24h after 30 days of complete stagnation at 84 holders — highly anomalous
Extreme sell pressure: 92% of 24h volume ($720.94K) is selling vs only 8% buying ($62.92K)
Micro-cap with only $45.53K total liquidity — extremely shallow and high slippage risk
Top holder concentration data unavailable (reported as 0%), limiting distribution analysis
No sniper data available; token is unverified with unknown update authority

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
24–72 hours

The token is under severe sell pressure with 92% of 24h volume being sells ($720.94K) versus only $62.92K in buys. The price dropped -17.15% in the past 24h and is trading at $0.000136. With only $45.53K in liquidity, any continued selling will cause rapid price deterioration. The recent 5m (+4.09%) and 1h (+7.83%) upticks may represent brief relief bounces within a broader downtrend.

Target low$0.000059 (prior candle open, key support)
Target high$0.000141 (recent 1h candle high)
Support: $0.000094 (1h candle low), $0.000060 (prior candle open/low)
Resistance: $0.000141 (recent 1h high), $0.000098 (prior candle open)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

Given the token's 30-day dormancy followed by a suspicious single-day spike in holders and overwhelming sell pressure, the medium-term outlook is bearish. The FDV of ~$136K is extremely small, liquidity is shallow, and there is no verified contract or meaningful on-chain fundamentals to support sustained price appreciation.

Catalysts
  • Any viral social media attention could temporarily spike price
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally could lift all boats briefly
  • Liquidity removal by LPs would accelerate price collapse

Bullish factors

  • Short-term 5m and 1h price momentum is positive (+4.09% and +7.83% respectively)
  • Rapid holder growth (1,008 new holders in 24h) could indicate genuine viral interest
  • Token is mutable=false, reducing some manipulation vectors

Bearish factors

  • 92% sell pressure by volume ($720.94K sells vs $62.92K buys)
  • Price down -17.15% in 24h despite holder surge — sellers dominating
  • Only $45.53K total liquidity — extremely shallow, high slippage
  • 30 days of complete dormancy (84 holders, zero change) before sudden spike is highly suspicious
  • Unverified contract, unknown update authority
  • No top holder data available — concentration risk unknown
  • FDV of only ~$136K with no described utility or roadmap
Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, top holder data is missing (reported as 0%), sniper data is unavailable, and the anomalous holder surge makes on-chain signals unreliable. Confidence in any directional prediction is therefore low.

fredward call history

Full track record →
Jul 21bearish
24h-89.8%
7d-97.5%
30d

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (15:00 UTC): O=$0.0000597, H=$0.0000977, L=$0.0000597, C=$0.0000977 — a strong bullish candle with close at the high, suggesting initial buying momentum. Candle [1] (16:00 UTC): O=$0.0000988, H=$0.000141, L=$0.0000942, C=$0.000136 — opened above prior close (gap up), made a new high at $0.000141, but closed below the high, forming a slight upper wick. This is a continuation candle with a bearish upper shadow, suggesting sellers emerged near the high. Volume collapsed dramatically from 782,002 (candle 2) to 11,338 (candle 1), indicating the buying surge has faded sharply.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 8%Sell 92%

The 2-candle window shows a short-term price spike (higher highs and higher closes over 2 hours), but the broader 24h context shows a -17.15% decline, indicating the medium-term trend is down. The volume collapse in the most recent candle is a warning sign that the short-term bounce may be exhausting.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000094 (candle 1 low)
Major$0.0000597 (candle 2 open/low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000141 (candle 1 high)
Major$0.000141 (only 2 candles available; this is the all-time high in the data window)

With only 2 hourly candles available, key levels are derived from the OHLC extremes. The $0.000094 level (candle 1 low) is immediate support; a break below this would target the $0.0000597 prior candle open. Resistance sits at the $0.000141 recent high. Given the volume collapse, a retest of support is more likely than a breakout above resistance.

Notable patterns

  • Bullish engulfing-style move in candle 2 (close at high)
  • Upper wick on candle 1 indicating seller resistance near $0.000141
  • Volume divergence: price rising while volume collapses 98.6% — bearish signal
  • Gap-up open on candle 1 relative to candle 2 close — potential exhaustion gap

Total holders1,092
24h Δ+92
7d Δ+92
30d Δ+92
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count surged +1,008 (+92%) in the past 24 hours, yet the price declined -17.15% over the same period. This negative correlation between holder growth and price is a major red flag — it suggests the new 'holders' may be wallets receiving dust, airdrop-style distributions, or wash-trade artifacts rather than genuine buyers accumulating at higher prices. Alternatively, it could indicate a coordinated pump attempt where insiders distributed to many wallets while selling into the market.

The historical holder data reveals a deeply suspicious pattern: the token sat at exactly 84 holders with zero change (0 net delta, 0% change) for every single day across the entire 30-day historical window (June 21 – July 20, 2026). Then, in a single 24-hour period (July 21), holders exploded from 84 to 1,092 — a gain of 1,008 holders. This is not organic growth; it is an anomalous, near-instantaneous event. The fact that 1,075 of 1,092 holders acquired via swap (vs only 17 via transfer) suggests these are real swap transactions, but the timing and scale relative to 30 days of complete dormancy is highly suspicious. The distribution data showing 0% concentration for all tiers (whales, sharks, dolphins, fish, octopus) and 0% for top 10/top 100 is likely a data reporting issue rather than genuinely perfect distribution.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token — the API returned no top 20 holders, and the supply concentration metrics report 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which is almost certainly a data gap rather than a genuine reflection of perfect distribution. With 997.6M total supply and 1,092 holders, the average holding is ~913K tokens (~$0.125 per wallet at current price), but without actual holder breakdown, concentration risk cannot be properly assessed. Given the token's micro-cap nature, PumpSwap origin, and suspicious holder surge, concentration risk is assumed to be HIGH until proven otherwise. The 'distributing' sentiment is inferred from the overwhelming sell pressure (92% of volume).

Liquidity$45,530
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$62,920
Sell$720,940
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers293
Unique sellers2,783

Market health is extremely poor. Total liquidity of $45.53K is dangerously shallow relative to the $720.94K in 24h sell volume — sellers have been moving volume that is nearly 16x the total liquidity pool. This implies significant price impact on any meaningful trade. The buy/sell ratio is severely imbalanced: 2,783 unique sellers vs only 293 unique buyers, with sell volume ($720.94K) outpacing buy volume ($62.92K) by ~11.5:1. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow). The token trades on PumpSwap (pair BbcLV1Mop1foqt3WwVczEPSReWBpgyzQc6TJhu1n7USC), a permissionless DEX with no circuit breakers. High slippage risk means even moderate sell orders will move the price significantly downward. This is not a healthy market structure.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply997,608,616.921127
FDV$136,084.27

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~997.6M tokens with an FDV of ~$136K at current prices. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, preventing a definitive assessment of mint and freeze authority status. The token is marked as mutable=false, which is a mild positive signal suggesting the metadata cannot be changed. However, without confirmed renouncement of mint and freeze authorities on-chain, the risk from authorities remains unknown. The token is unverified (verified contract: false) and has no description, which is typical of low-effort meme tokens. The FDV of $136K is extremely small, making this a nano-cap asset with very high volatility and manipulation risk. Social links (website, moralis) are listed but not independently verifiable here.

Volatility
high

Price moved ~128% in 2 hours based on available candles, then declined -17.15% over 24h. Extreme intraday volatility on a nano-cap token with $45.53K liquidity.

Liquidity
high

Only $45.53K total liquidity against $720.94K in 24h sell volume. Any significant sell order will cause severe price impact and slippage. Exit liquidity is extremely limited.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is unavailable (reported as 0% for all tiers), which is a data gap. With only 1,092 holders and a PumpSwap origin, concentration is presumed high. The suspicious 30-day dormancy followed by a single-day +1,008 holder surge suggests possible coordinated wallet activity.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available, so direct sniper dump risk cannot be quantified. However, the 92% sell pressure and 2,783 unique sellers in 24h indicate broad distribution/dumping behavior regardless of sniper activity.

Authority
medium

Update authority is listed as 'unknown'. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed as renounced. Token is unverified. Mutable=false provides some reassurance on metadata, but on-chain authority risks remain unresolved.

Key risks

  • Extreme sell pressure: 92% of 24h volume is selling ($720.94K vs $62.92K buys)
  • Suspicious holder pattern: 30 days of zero growth followed by +1,008 holders in 24h — possible wash activity or coordinated pump
  • Nano-cap liquidity ($45.53K) — extremely vulnerable to price manipulation and exit failures
  • No top holder data available — concentration risk is unquantifiable but presumed high
  • Unverified contract with unknown update/mint/freeze authority status
  • No utility, description, or roadmap — pure speculative meme token
  • Price already down -17.15% in 24h despite holder surge — insiders likely distributing

Mitigating factors

  • Token is marked mutable=false, reducing metadata manipulation risk
  • 1,075 of 1,092 holders acquired via swap (not airdrop), suggesting some genuine market participation
  • Short-term price momentum is positive (5m: +4.09%, 1h: +7.83%) — brief relief bounce possible
  • Possible spam flag is false per metadata
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token risks. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket only). This is NOT financial advice.

FREDWARD is a nano-cap Solana meme token with an FDV of ~$136K that exhibits multiple high-risk characteristics: 30 days of complete dormancy followed by a suspicious single-day holder explosion, overwhelming sell pressure (92% of volume), extremely shallow liquidity ($45.53K), and no verifiable fundamentals. The risk/reward profile is highly unfavorable at current levels given the dominant sell-side activity.

Bull case (low)

Viral meme momentum drives genuine retail FOMO, absorbing sell pressure and pushing price toward or above the $0.000141 recent high. If the holder surge represents genuine organic discovery (e.g., viral social media post), continued inflows could sustain price.

  • Viral social media catalyst (Twitter/X, TikTok) driving retail attention
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all micro-caps
  • Whale accumulation at current depressed prices
  • Sell pressure exhaustion leading to short squeeze

Base case

The token experiences a brief speculative spike followed by a gradual decline as sell pressure continues. Price stabilizes somewhere between $0.000060–$0.000100 as the initial excitement fades, with the holder count plateauing. The token remains a low-liquidity, high-risk meme with no clear catalyst for sustained growth.

  • Sell pressure moderates but does not reverse
  • Liquidity remains at current shallow levels
  • No major viral catalyst emerges
  • Token does not get listed on any centralized exchange
  • Authority risks do not materialize in the short term

Bear case (high)

Sell pressure continues to dominate, liquidity is removed by LPs, and the price collapses back toward or below the $0.0000597 prior candle low. The suspicious holder surge proves to be wash activity, and the token returns to dormancy or is abandoned.

  • Continued 92% sell pressure exhausts buy-side liquidity
  • LP liquidity removal collapses the price floor
  • Holder surge proves to be coordinated/artificial — no real demand
  • Broader market downturn reduces risk appetite for nano-cap memes
  • Unknown authority risks materialize (mint/freeze)

GeneratedJul 21, 04:17 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of July 21, 2026 ~16:00–17:00 UTC. Historical holder data covers June 21 – July 20, 2026 (30 days daily). Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (Mint: D4QYDUW4AEbLS2Qz22iHuSKsT7X5QhKm25a5YYFejr8z)
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics (pair BbcLV1Mop1foqt3WwVczEPSReWBpgyzQc6TJhu1n7USC)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles, July 21 2026)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Trading volume and buyer/seller analytics

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top 20 holder data is entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be properly quantified
  • Sniper data is unavailable — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
  • Update/mint/freeze authority status is unknown — tokenomics security cannot be fully evaluated
  • Supply concentration reported as 0% for all tiers — likely a data gap, not genuine perfect distribution
  • The anomalous holder surge (84 → 1,092 in 24h after 30 days of zero growth) makes historical trend analysis unreliable
  • No verified contract or on-chain program audit available

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially nano-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past on-chain patterns do not guarantee future price performance.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply997,608,616.921127

Key Risks

Extreme sell pressure: 92% of 24h volume is selling ($720.94K vs $62.92K buys)
Suspicious holder pattern: 30 days of zero growth followed by +1,008 holders in 24h — possible wash activity or coordinated pump
Nano-cap liquidity ($45.53K) — extremely vulnerable to price manipulation and exit failures
No top holder data available — concentration risk is unquantifiable but presumed high

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for FREDWARD. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper activity. The broader trading analytics do show that 2,783 unique sellers vs only 293 unique buyers participated in the last 24h, with sell volume ($720.94K) dwarfing buy volume ($62.92K) by a ratio of ~11.5:1. This strongly suggests early holders or insiders are distributing into any buying interest.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available for this token.

Cannot be determined from sniper data (unavailable). However, the extreme sell-to-buy ratio (11,001 sell transactions vs 1,531 buy transactions in 24h) and the -17.15% price decline suggest early buyers or insiders are aggressively exiting positions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for fredward the duck (fredward)?

The token is under severe sell pressure with 92% of 24h volume being sells ($720.94K) versus only $62.92K in buys. The price dropped -17.15% in the past 24h and is trading at $0.000136. With only $45.53K in liquidity, any continued selling will cause rapid price deterioration. The recent 5m (+4.09%) and 1h (+7.83%) upticks may represent brief relief bounces within a broader downtrend. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000059 (prior candle open, key support) to $0.000141 (recent 1h candle high).

Is fredward a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token risks. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket only). This is NOT financial advice.

How are fredward holders trending?

fredward the duck currently has 1,092 holders and is growing (24h: 92, 7d: 92, 30d: 92). The historical holder data reveals a deeply suspicious pattern: the token sat at exactly 84 holders with zero change (0 net delta, 0% change) for every single day across the entire 30-day historical window (June 21 – July 20, 2026). Then, in a single 24-hour period (July 21), holders exploded from 84 to 1,092 — a gain of 1,008 holders. This is not organic growth; it is an anomalous, near-instantaneous event. The fact that 1,075 of 1,092 holders acquired via swap (vs only 17 via transfer) suggests these are real swap transactions, but the timing and scale relative to 30 days of complete dormancy is highly suspicious. The distribution data showing 0% concentration for all tiers (whales, sharks, dolphins, fish, octopus) and 0% for top 10/top 100 is likely a data reporting issue rather than genuinely perfect distribution.

What does sniper activity look like for fredward?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding fredward?

Extreme sell pressure: 92% of 24h volume is selling ($720.94K vs $62.92K buys) • Suspicious holder pattern: 30 days of zero growth followed by +1,008 holders in 24h — possible wash activity or coordinated pump • Nano-cap liquidity ($45.53K) — extremely vulnerable to price manipulation and exit failures

Track fredward