FEBUISM

Febu Economic Model Price Today & AI Analysis

FEBUISM
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 11, 2026

D26f969Jfwh1m7yATNfmrNeTz8Qp3piq88bHsn4Epump

$0.051958

+0.87%

FDV $1,954

LiveContract:D26f969Jfwh1m7yATNfmrNeTz8Qp3piq88bHsn4EpumpChain:SolanaHolders:191Market cap:$1,954

More tokens on Solana

HENRY

HENRY

Justice For Henry Nowak

$0.04267216.6%
MC $26.7K
SISYPUSS

SISYPUSS

The Sisypuss

$0.0416349.1%
MC $15.8K
Looks

Looks

Looks at you

$0.0595210.1%
MC $9.2K
Fro

Fro

Afroman

$0.0481677.6%
MC $81.6K
Burqa

Burqa

Infinite Voter Glitch

$0.0524360.8%
MC $2.4K
TRUMP

TRUMP

OFFICIAL TRUMP

$2.531.4%
MC $2.53B

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about FEBUISM

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 11, 10:47 AM
FDV

$9,922

Liquidity

$24,173

Holders

438

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

FEBUISM (Febu Economic Model) is a PumpFun-launched Solana memecoin with a total supply of ~999.9M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of approximately $7.88K–$9.9K. The token experienced a dramatic pump-and-dump event on 2026-07-11, with price surging from ~$0.0000315 to a high of ~$0.0000589 before collapsing over 86% within 6 hours to its current price of ~$0.0000099. Sell pressure is overwhelming at 77% of 24h volume ($210.49K sells vs $62.89K buys). Liquidity is extremely thin at $24.17K. The token has no verified contract, no description, unknown update authority, and top holder data is unavailable — all significant red flags.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme pump-and-dump price action: -86% in 6 hours, -73% in 24 hours
Overwhelming sell pressure: 77% sell volume ($210.49K) vs 23% buy volume ($62.89K)
Holder base was flat at 114 for 30 days, then spiked +324 (74%) in 24h — consistent with a coordinated pump event
Extremely thin liquidity at $24.17K with high slippage risk
No top holder data available, no supply concentration metrics, no verified contract

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token is in severe post-pump distribution. Price has collapsed from a high of ~$0.0000589 (candle [6] high) to ~$0.0000099 — a drop of ~83% from peak. The most recent candle shows a 30% 1h recovery, but this is likely a dead-cat bounce within a dominant downtrend. Sell pressure at 77% of volume and 5,214 sell transactions vs 2,104 buys confirm continued distribution. Immediate support is the recent low around $0.0000055 (candle [1] low); a break below could see further capitulation.

Target low$0.0000040
Target high$0.0000130
Support: $0.0000055 (candle [1] low), $0.0000053 (candle [2] low / candle [3] low cluster)
Resistance: $0.0000109 (candle [4] high area), $0.0000174 (candle [5] open), $0.0000530 (candle [6] open / prior pump level)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Given the token's history of 30 days of zero holder growth (flat at 114 holders) followed by a single-day pump-and-dump, there is no evidence of organic community development or utility. The FDV of ~$7.88K and liquidity of $24.17K suggest the token is unlikely to attract meaningful capital. Without a catalyst, price is expected to drift toward near-zero.

Catalysts
  • Any renewed social media promotion could trigger another short-lived pump
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally could provide temporary lift
  • Absence of any utility or roadmap makes sustained recovery highly unlikely

Bullish factors

  • 1h price recovered +30.25% suggesting some residual buying interest
  • Holder count grew +324 in 24h, indicating new participants entered
  • 2,104 buy transactions in 24h shows some demand still exists

Bearish factors

  • Price down -86% in 6 hours and -73% in 24 hours — classic dump pattern
  • Sell volume ($210.49K) is 3.35x buy volume ($62.89K)
  • 5,214 sell transactions vs 2,104 buy transactions
  • Liquidity only $24.17K — any meaningful sell will crater price further
  • 30 days of zero holder growth prior to pump suggests no organic community
  • No verified contract, no description, unknown update authority
  • FDV of ~$7.88K is extremely low — near-zero market cap
Confidence: medium. Confidence is medium because the OHLC data clearly shows a completed pump-and-dump cycle with strong sell pressure, but the 30% 1h bounce introduces short-term uncertainty. The lack of top holder data and sniper data limits precision in predicting exact price floors.

FEBUISM call history

Full track record →
Jul 11bearish
24h-65.9%
7d-83.1%
30d-84.0%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

9 hourly candles covering 2026-07-11T02:00Z to 2026-07-11T10:00Z. The sequence shows a classic pump-and-dump: candles [9]–[7] show price rising from ~$0.0000315 open to a peak high of ~$0.0000589 (candle [6] high), with volume surging to $68.6K (candle [7]) and $142.9K (candle [8]). Candle [6] is a massive bearish engulfing/shooting star: opened at $0.0000534, hit high of $0.0000589, then collapsed to close at $0.0000160 — a wick-heavy bearish reversal candle with $25.6K volume. Candles [5]–[1] show a staircase of lower highs and lower lows: $0.0000173 → $0.0000110 → $0.0000073 → $0.0000071 → $0.0000086, confirming a sustained downtrend. The most recent candle [1] shows a slight recovery (O:$0.0000067, C:$0.0000079) but remains far below the pump peak.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 23%Sell 77%

Both short-term and medium-term trends are firmly bearish. The token completed a full pump-and-dump cycle within 8 hours. Lower highs and lower lows dominate candles [6] through [1]. The 30-day historical context shows no prior uptrend — this was a single-event spike followed by collapse.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000055 (candle [1] low / candle [3] low cluster)
Major$0.0000030 (estimated capitulation floor given FDV trajectory)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000109 (candle [4] high)
Major$0.0000174 (candle [5] open / candle [6] close area)

The $0.0000053–$0.0000055 zone represents a key support cluster where candles [2] and [3] found lows. A break below this level would open the door to further capitulation. Resistance at $0.0000109 corresponds to candle [4]'s high; the $0.0000174 level marks the candle [5] open and candle [6] close, representing the first major overhead supply zone from the dump.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing at candle [6]: opened $0.0000534, high $0.0000589, closed $0.0000160 — classic pump reversal candle
  • Staircase of lower highs and lower lows from candle [6] to candle [1] — confirmed downtrend
  • Volume climax at candle [8] ($142.9K) during distribution phase — smart money exit signal
  • Dead-cat bounce pattern: candle [1] shows +17.4% body recovery after extreme oversold conditions
  • Volume decay: 9 consecutive candles of declining volume post-peak — exhaustion pattern

Total holders438
24h Δ+324
7d Δ+324
30d Δ+324
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count was completely flat at 114 for the entire 30-day historical period (June 11 – July 10, 2026), showing zero organic growth. The +324 holder spike (+74%) occurred simultaneously with the pump-and-dump event on July 11, 2026. This means ALL holder growth is directly correlated with the price pump — new holders entered during the spike and are now likely holding at a loss. This is a negative signal: holder growth driven by a pump event rather than organic adoption.

The historical holder data reveals a deeply concerning pattern: 114 holders for 30 consecutive days with zero net change, followed by a sudden +324 holder increase (+74%) in a single 24-hour period coinciding with a -73% price crash. This is the hallmark of a pump-and-dump: a small group of 114 holders held the token dormant, a coordinated pump attracted 324 new retail buyers, and the original holders distributed into the new demand. The current 438 holders are predominantly new entrants who bought during or after the pump and are now underwater.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

N/A

Top holder data unavailable — no on-chain holder breakdown provided

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for FEBUISM — the API returned no top holders and supply concentration metrics show 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which likely reflects a data gap rather than true uniform distribution. Given the pump-and-dump price action, the 30-day dormant holder base of 114, and the overwhelming sell pressure (77% of volume), the inferred sentiment of original holders is 'distributing.' The absence of whale map data is itself a red flag, as it prevents assessment of concentration risk. The distribution health is classified as 'very_concentrated' by inference: a 30-day flat holder count of 114 with zero growth suggests a tightly controlled supply prior to the pump event.

Liquidity$24,170
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$62,890
Sell$210,490
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers702
Unique sellers1,949

Liquidity is critically thin at $24.17K on a single PumpSwap pair (4K3HqcBMdmCmpdJQXy32WjgcRHKSFZNQ3tkcj4YXYTaT). With a FDV of only $7.88K and liquidity of $24.17K, the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 3:1, which is unusual and suggests the pool may be imbalanced post-dump. Any sell order of meaningful size will cause extreme slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $210.49K in sells vs $62.89K in buys — a net outflow of ~$147.6K. Unique sellers (1,949) outnumber unique buyers (702) by 2.78:1. The market health is poor: thin liquidity, dominant sell pressure, and a post-pump price structure all indicate an unhealthy market with high exit risk for current holders.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,866,781.62
FDV$7,880 (per trading analytics) / $9,922 (per metadata)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

FEBUISM has a total supply of ~999.87M tokens with 6 decimals, consistent with a standard PumpFun launch. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the contract is unverified, making it impossible to confirm whether mint or freeze authorities have been renounced. The token is marked as 'mutable: false' which is a mild positive signal (metadata cannot be changed), but without confirmed authority renouncement, rug risk from authorities cannot be assessed. The FDV discrepancy between metadata ($9,922) and trading analytics ($7,880) reflects price movement between data pulls. No description is provided, and social links are limited to Twitter and Moralis. The absence of a verified contract and unknown authority status are significant tokenomics red flags.

Volatility
high

Price dropped -86% in 6 hours and -73% in 24 hours. The token went from ~$0.0000589 peak to ~$0.0000099 current — an 83% collapse from peak. Extreme volatility is confirmed by OHLC data.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $24.17K on a single PumpSwap pool. With 24h sell volume of $210.49K already processed, remaining liquidity is critically thin. Large exits will face severe slippage.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is unavailable, preventing direct assessment. However, the 30-day flat holder count of 114 strongly implies concentrated ownership prior to the pump. The sudden +324 holder spike during the dump suggests original holders distributed to new retail buyers.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available. However, the pump-and-dump price pattern and volume profile (peak volume during sell-off) are consistent with coordinated early-buyer distribution. Risk is elevated but cannot be precisely quantified without sniper data.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown' and the contract is unverified. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The token is marked 'mutable: false' which provides some protection, but the overall authority picture is opaque.

Key risks

  • Completed pump-and-dump cycle: -86% in 6 hours with $210.49K in sell volume
  • Critically thin liquidity ($24.17K) — high slippage risk on any exit
  • 30 days of zero organic holder growth followed by pump-driven spike — no genuine community
  • No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential rug risk
  • Unverified contract with no description or whitepaper
  • FDV of ~$7.88K — near-zero market cap with no fundamental value basis
  • 1,949 unique sellers vs 702 unique buyers in 24h — overwhelming distribution pressure

Mitigating factors

  • Token marked as 'mutable: false' — metadata cannot be altered
  • Not flagged as spam by data provider
  • Some residual buying activity (2,104 buy transactions, 702 unique buyers) suggests not completely abandoned
  • 1h price recovery of +30.25% suggests some short-term support
Suitable for: This token is NOT suitable for any risk-averse investor. It may only be considered by highly experienced traders with strict stop-losses who are aware they are speculating on a post-pump token with near-zero fundamental value. The overwhelming evidence points to a completed pump-and-dump event. Any remaining position should be treated as near-total-loss risk.

FEBUISM presents no credible investment thesis. The token exhibits all hallmarks of a coordinated pump-and-dump: 30 days of dormancy at 114 holders, a sudden price spike to $0.0000589, followed by an -86% collapse within 6 hours. Sell volume ($210.49K) dwarfs buy volume ($62.89K) by 3.35x. Liquidity is critically thin at $24.17K. There is no verified contract, no description, no utility, and no evidence of organic community development. The FDV of ~$7.88K reflects near-zero market value.

Bull case (low)

A second pump wave is triggered by renewed social media promotion, attracting new retail buyers and temporarily pushing price back toward the $0.0000174–$0.0000530 range.

  • Residual social media attention from the initial pump could attract new buyers
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally could lift all boats temporarily
  • The 1h +30.25% recovery suggests some buyers are still active

Base case

Price stabilizes in the $0.0000050–$0.0000100 range with minimal trading activity as the token fades into obscurity, with occasional minor pumps and dumps driven by low-liquidity volatility.

  • Some residual buyers continue to provide minimal support at current levels
  • No major new catalyst emerges to drive a second pump
  • Liquidity remains thin, preventing large price moves in either direction
  • Token does not get delisted or abandoned entirely in the near term

Bear case (high)

Price continues to decline toward near-zero as remaining holders exit through the thin $24.17K liquidity pool, with no new buyers to absorb sell pressure.

  • Dominant sell pressure: 77% of 24h volume is sells
  • No organic community, utility, or fundamental value
  • Critically thin liquidity amplifies downside price impact
  • Original 114 holders likely already distributed — no support base
  • New 324 holders entered at pump prices and face large unrealized losses

GeneratedJul 11, 10:47 AM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-07-11T10:00Z. OHLC data covers the most recent 9 hourly candles. Holder data is current as of the same timestamp.
Model confidence
medium

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Mint: D26f969Jfwh1m7yATNfmrNeTz8Qp3piq88bHsn4Epump)
  • Price feed and 24h change data
  • Hourly OHLC candles (9 candles, 2026-07-11T02:00Z to 2026-07-11T10:00Z)
  • Trading analytics (volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30 days daily)
  • PumpSwap pair data (4K3HqcBMdmCmpdJQXy32WjgcRHKSFZNQ3tkcj4YXYTaT)
  • Moralis and Twitter social links (referenced in metadata)

Limitations

  • Top holder data is entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be directly quantified
  • Sniper analysis data is unavailable — early buyer behavior cannot be precisely assessed
  • Update authority status is 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority renouncement cannot be confirmed
  • Only 9 hourly OHLC candles available — limited technical analysis window
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($9,922) and trading analytics ($7,880) suggests data was pulled at different times
  • Supply concentration metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%) likely reflect a data gap rather than true uniform distribution
  • No contract verification or audit data available
  • Social sentiment data (Twitter) not directly analyzed

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap memecoins, carry extreme risk of total loss. The evidence strongly suggests this token has undergone a pump-and-dump event. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Always conduct your own due diligence.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,866,781.62

Key Risks

•Completed pump-and-dump cycle: -86% in 6 hours with $210.49K in sell volume
•Critically thin liquidity ($24.17K) — high slippage risk on any exit
•30 days of zero organic holder growth followed by pump-driven spike — no genuine community
•No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for FEBUISM. However, the on-chain trading analytics paint a clear picture: 5,214 sell transactions vs 2,104 buy transactions in 24h, with $210.49K in sell volume vs $62.89K in buy volume. The volume pattern — peaking at $142.9K during the dump phase (candle [8]) — strongly suggests early buyers or coordinated actors distributed their holdings into retail demand during the pump. The 30-day flat holder count (114 holders) followed by a sudden +324 holder spike in 24h is consistent with a coordinated pump attracting new retail buyers who are now holding bags.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available for this token.

Early buyers who participated in the pump (candles [7]–[9], price range $0.0000304–$0.0000528) are likely in significant loss at current price of ~$0.0000099. Those who bought at the very beginning of the pump cycle (candle [9] open ~$0.0000315) are down ~68% from entry. Only buyers from candles [1]–[3] (price ~$0.0000053–$0.0000079) may be near breakeven or slightly profitable.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Febu Economic Model (FEBUISM)?

The token is in severe post-pump distribution. Price has collapsed from a high of ~$0.0000589 (candle [6] high) to ~$0.0000099 — a drop of ~83% from peak. The most recent candle shows a 30% 1h recovery, but this is likely a dead-cat bounce within a dominant downtrend. Sell pressure at 77% of volume and 5,214 sell transactions vs 2,104 buys confirm continued distribution. Immediate support is the recent low around $0.0000055 (candle [1] low); a break below could see further capitulation. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000040 to $0.0000130.

Is FEBUISM a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is NOT suitable for any risk-averse investor. It may only be considered by highly experienced traders with strict stop-losses who are aware they are speculating on a post-pump token with near-zero fundamental value. The overwhelming evidence points to a completed pump-and-dump event. Any remaining position should be treated as near-total-loss risk.

How are FEBUISM holders trending?

Febu Economic Model currently has 438 holders and is growing (24h: 324, 7d: 324, 30d: 324). The historical holder data reveals a deeply concerning pattern: 114 holders for 30 consecutive days with zero net change, followed by a sudden +324 holder increase (+74%) in a single 24-hour period coinciding with a -73% price crash. This is the hallmark of a pump-and-dump: a small group of 114 holders held the token dormant, a coordinated pump attracted 324 new retail buyers, and the original holders distributed into the new demand. The current 438 holders are predominantly new entrants who bought during or after the pump and are now underwater.

What does sniper activity look like for FEBUISM?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding FEBUISM?

Completed pump-and-dump cycle: -86% in 6 hours with $210.49K in sell volume • Critically thin liquidity ($24.17K) — high slippage risk on any exit • 30 days of zero organic holder growth followed by pump-driven spike — no genuine community

← Back to all predictions

Track FEBUISM