Hex

Hex on Solana Price Prediction 2026

Hex
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 7, 2026

CtuShQdgEYN7S3raAxJi2QBnpobWea3pv9PaGyRgpump

$0.054708

+69.40%

FDV $4,708

LiveContract:CtuShQdgEYN7S3raAxJi2QBnpobWea3pv9PaGyRgpumpChain:SolanaHolders:258Market cap:$4,708

More tokens on Solana

BINDY

BINDY

Bindy

$0.05797426.5%
MC $8.0K
AMERICA

AMERICA

America Is Back

$0.0452267.5%
MC $52.3K
HypurrClaw

HypurrClaw

HypurrClaw

$0.0411640.7%
MC $11.6K
1000x

1000x

1000x

$0.05912011.2%
MC $9.1K
LIGMA

LIGMA

Ligma Balls

$0.05279426.6%
MC $2.8K
BOME

BOME

BOOK OF MEME

$0.0012951.4%
MC $89.19M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Hex

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 7, 01:19 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$89,839

Holders

18

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Hex on Solana (HEX, mint: CtuShQdgEYN7S3raAxJi2QBnpobWea3pv9PaGyRgpump) is an extremely anomalous PumpSwap token exhibiting multiple severe red flags. The token reports a total supply of 1 (with 0 decimals), a fully diluted value of $0.00 in metadata yet a trading analytics FDV of $871K, and only 18 current holders — down sharply from 181 just days ago. The 24h price change of +2,266% is contradicted by the OHLC data and the analytics panel showing 0% 24h change, indicating data inconsistency likely caused by manipulation or wash trading. Sell pressure dominates at 66.1% of volume. No top holder data, no social links, unverified contract, mutable metadata, and unknown update authority compound the risk picture. This token presents an extremely high-risk profile consistent with a pump-and-dump or rug-pull scenario.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Total supply reported as 1 whole token (0 decimals) — highly unusual and likely indicative of a misconfigured or deceptive token structure
Holder count collapsed from 181 to 18 in under 24 hours (-910%), suggesting mass exits or wallet consolidation
Price data is internally contradictory: 24h change shown as both +2,266% and 0% across different data fields
No top holder data available, no social links, unverified contract, and mutable metadata with unknown update authority
Sell pressure at 66.1% with 1,086 sells vs 711 buys in 24h despite a reported massive price spike

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token has experienced an extreme intraday spike (candle [9] opened at ~$0.0000322 and recent candles show prices near $0.000087, with the current price at $0.000843 — a level far above all OHLC candle data provided, suggesting the price feed may be stale or manipulated). Sell pressure dominates at 66.1%. With only 18 holders remaining and a collapsing holder base, further downside is the most probable short-term outcome. The OHLC data shows the highest candle high at ~$0.000633 (candle [1] L field appears anomalous — likely a data error), with a realistic recent high around $0.000087. The current reported price of $0.000843 is ~10x above the highest OHLC candle value, which is a major inconsistency.

Target low$0.000032
Target high$0.000087
Support: $0.000041 (candles [6]–[8] cluster), $0.000032 (candle [9] open / recent low)
Resistance: $0.000087 (candle [1]–[3] highs), $0.000633 (anomalous candle [1] low — possible data artifact)

Medium term

bearish
1–30 days

The structural anomalies — 1-token supply, collapsing holder count, no verified contract, mutable metadata, zero social presence, and dominant sell pressure — make a sustained recovery extremely unlikely. The token lacks the fundamental characteristics of a legitimate project.

Catalysts
  • Any remaining holders exiting would further collapse price and liquidity
  • No identifiable positive catalysts given absence of social links, team information, or roadmap
  • Liquidity of only $89.84K is shallow and could be withdrawn at any time

Bullish factors

  • Short-term momentum indicators show a 906% 1h gain and 14.93% 5m gain per analytics panel (though reliability is questionable)
  • Total liquidity of $89.84K provides some minimal trading depth
  • 451 unique buyers in 24h suggests some speculative interest

Bearish factors

  • Sell pressure dominates at 66.1% (1,086 sells vs 711 buys)
  • Holder count collapsed from 181 to 18 (-910%) in under 24 hours
  • No top holder data, no social links, unverified and mutable contract
  • Total supply of 1 token with 0 decimals is structurally anomalous
  • Contradictory price data across data sources undermines reliability
  • FDV listed as $0.00 in metadata vs $871K in analytics — major discrepancy
  • No sniper data available, obscuring early buyer behavior
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to severe internal data inconsistencies (contradictory 24h price change figures, OHLC values far below current reported price, anomalous supply of 1 token), missing top holder data, and no sniper data. The data environment is too unreliable to make high-confidence price predictions.

Hex call history

Full track record →
Jul 7bearish
24h-69.6%
7d-91.9%
30d-99.7%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

9 hourly candles are available (2026-07-07T03:00 through 2026-07-07T13:00 UTC). Candle [9] (03:00) shows a wide-range bullish candle: open $0.0000322, high $0.0000666, close $0.0000444, with very high volume (45,652 units) — a strong initial pump. Candles [4]–[8] (04:00–09:00) show consolidation in the $0.0000411–$0.0000466 range with very low volume (0.79–1,363 units), indicating minimal activity. Candle [3] (11:00) shows a bullish close at $0.0000870 with negligible volume (157 units). Candle [2] (12:00) is a bearish candle: open $0.0000871, close $0.0000717, with high volume (83,613 units) — a significant sell-off. Candle [1] (13:00) shows open $0.0000717, high $0.0000871, close $0.0000871 with moderate volume (19,016 units). NOTE: Candle [1]'s Low field ($0.000633) appears to be a data anomaly — it is higher than the High, which is physically impossible; this value should be treated as erroneous. The current reported price of $0.000843 is approximately 10x above the highest OHLC candle value of $0.0000871, suggesting either a very recent spike after the last candle or a data feed error.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 34%Sell 66%

Short-term price action shows an upward spike from $0.0000322 to $0.0000871 within the 9-candle window, but the move is accompanied by dominant sell volume in the most recent high-volume candle. Medium-term trend is effectively sideways/unknown given the token's very short observable history and data inconsistencies.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000041 (candles [6]–[8] consolidation zone)
Major$0.000032 (candle [9] open — recent absolute low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000087 (candles [1]–[3] highs)
Major$0.000843 (current reported price — far above OHLC data, treat with caution)

The $0.000041–$0.000046 range served as a consolidation zone across multiple low-volume candles and represents the nearest meaningful support. The $0.000032 level is the lowest observed price in the dataset. Resistance at $0.000087 aligns with the recent candle highs. The current reported price of $0.000843 is an outlier relative to all OHLC data and may reflect a very recent spike or data error.

Notable patterns

  • Wide-range bullish candle at open (candle [9]) followed by consolidation — classic pump initiation pattern
  • High-volume bearish candle [2] at the recent high — distribution/sell-off signal
  • Anomalous Low value in candle [1] ($0.000633 > High $0.000087) — data integrity issue, possible feed manipulation or error
  • Volume cluster at candle [9] and [2] with near-zero volume in between — consistent with coordinated pump-and-dump activity
  • Current price ($0.000843) is ~10x above all OHLC candle highs — extreme divergence suggesting either a post-candle spike or corrupted price feed

Total holders18
24h Δ-163
7d Δ-163
30d Δ-163
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

Paradoxically, the reported price has spiked +2,266% in 24h while holders collapsed by 163 (-910%). This inverse relationship — rising price with falling holders — is a classic distribution signal where a small number of actors pump price while the majority of holders exit. The historical data shows 181 holders stable for the entire 30-day period prior to the current date, followed by a sudden collapse to 18.

The historical holder series shows exactly 181 holders with zero net change every single day from 2026-06-07 through 2026-07-06 — 30 consecutive days of complete stasis. This is highly abnormal for any legitimate token and suggests either the holder tracking was non-functional, the token was dormant/inactive, or the data is unreliable. The sudden drop to 18 holders (a loss of 163, or -90%) coinciding with the price spike is a severe red flag. Growth is not accelerating — it is sharply declining.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available — the data source returned no top holders for this token

0.00%

No top holder data is available for this token. The supply concentration metrics show top10=0% and top100=0%, which is inconsistent with a token that has only 18 holders and a total supply of 1. These figures are almost certainly data artifacts rather than accurate readings. With only 18 holders and a total supply of 1 (0 decimals), the token's distribution is effectively impossible to analyze meaningfully — a single indivisible token cannot be held by multiple parties in the traditional sense. This structural anomaly makes the whale map analysis unreliable. The token's distribution should be considered 'very concentrated' by default given these constraints.

Liquidity$89,840
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$51,560
Sell$100,680
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers451
Unique sellers524

Total liquidity of $89.84K on PumpSwap (pair 4N2pE1UCuR3ELp5C7vsRW6d44wqgBc12VduBGNkAKpzj) is shallow relative to the 24h trading volume of ~$152K combined. The sell-to-buy volume ratio of approximately 1.95:1 ($100.68K sells vs $51.56K buys) confirms net outflow. With 524 unique sellers vs 451 unique buyers, more participants are exiting than entering. Slippage risk is high given the shallow liquidity pool — any significant sell order could move the price dramatically. The liquidity could also be withdrawn by the pool creator at any time given the unverified, mutable contract nature of this token.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (0 decimals)
FDV$871,030 (per analytics) / $0.00 (per metadata) — severe discrepancy

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token's tokenomics are deeply anomalous. A total supply of 1 with 0 decimals means the token is a single indivisible unit — this is not a standard fungible token structure and is inconsistent with the trading activity showing hundreds of buyers and sellers. This likely indicates either: (1) the supply data is incorrect/corrupted, (2) the token uses a non-standard structure, or (3) this is a deliberately deceptive setup. The FDV discrepancy ($0.00 in metadata vs $871K in analytics) further undermines data reliability. Update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the contract is mutable, meaning token metadata can be changed at any time — a significant rug risk factor. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be determined from the available data. No social links, no verified contract, and a generic description ('The Future of Finance is Here') provide no additional confidence.

Volatility
high

Reported 24h price change of +2,266% with contradictory data across sources. OHLC candles show extreme intraday swings. Current price ($0.000843) is ~10x above the highest OHLC candle value ($0.000087), indicating extreme volatility or data manipulation.

Liquidity
high

Only $89.84K in total liquidity on a single PumpSwap pool. Sell volume ($100.68K) already exceeds total liquidity in 24h. High slippage risk on any meaningful position. Liquidity can be withdrawn at any time by the pool creator.

Concentration
high

Only 18 current holders (down from 181). No top holder data available. Total supply of 1 indivisible token is structurally anomalous. Effective concentration is unknown but almost certainly extreme given the tiny holder count.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, but the pattern of a 30-day dormant period followed by a sudden price spike and holder collapse is consistent with coordinated pump-and-dump activity. The 66.1% sell pressure and net outflow confirm distribution behavior.

Authority
high

Update authority is 'unknown', contract is mutable (metadata can be changed), contract is unverified, and mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. This represents maximum authority risk — the token creator retains unknown but potentially full control over the token.

Key risks

  • Total supply of 1 (0 decimals) is structurally anomalous and inconsistent with observed trading activity
  • Holder count collapsed 90% (181 → 18) in under 24 hours while price spiked — classic pump-and-dump signal
  • Contradictory price data: 24h change shown as both +2,266% and 0% in different data fields
  • Current price ($0.000843) is ~10x above all OHLC candle highs — extreme data inconsistency
  • Mutable, unverified contract with unknown update authority — rug risk is unquantifiable
  • No social links, no team information, no roadmap — zero accountability
  • Sell pressure dominates at 66.1% with net outflow confirmed
  • 30 consecutive days of zero holder change prior to current date — suggests token was dormant or data was frozen
  • FDV discrepancy: $0.00 (metadata) vs $871K (analytics)

Mitigating factors

  • Token is not flagged as 'possible spam' by the data provider (though this may not be reliable)
  • Some genuine trading activity exists (686 unique wallets in 24h, $152K combined volume)
  • $89.84K liquidity provides minimal but non-zero exit opportunity for small positions
Suitable for: This token is NOT suitable for any investor. The combination of structural anomalies (1-token supply, 0 decimals), data inconsistencies, collapsing holder base, dominant sell pressure, mutable unverified contract, and patterns consistent with pump-and-dump activity make this an extremely high-risk asset. Only those prepared to lose 100% of their investment should consider any interaction with this token, and even then, the risk-reward profile is deeply unfavorable.

Hex on Solana presents no credible investment thesis. The token exhibits nearly every hallmark of a pump-and-dump or rug-pull scheme: anomalous supply structure, collapsing holder base, contradictory price data, mutable unverified contract, zero social presence, and dominant sell pressure. The 30-day period of complete holder stasis followed by a sudden spike and mass exit is a textbook distribution pattern. There is no identifiable utility, team, roadmap, or community to support a long-term value proposition.

Bull case (low)

Speculative momentum trade: If the price spike is genuine and momentum continues, short-term traders who entered at very low prices (near $0.000032–$0.000041) may realize gains. The 5m price change of +14.93% suggests very short-term momentum.

  • Continued speculative buying from momentum traders unaware of fundamentals
  • Possible viral social media attention (though no social links currently exist)
  • Short-term price momentum (+14.93% in 5m per analytics)

Base case

Continued decline with occasional volatility spikes: The token drifts lower as remaining holders exit, with periodic low-volume price spikes driven by bots or wash trading. Eventually becomes illiquid and abandoned.

  • No new organic demand materializes given zero social presence
  • Remaining 18 holders gradually exit over days to weeks
  • Liquidity remains thin and subject to withdrawal
  • No legitimate project development occurs

Bear case (high)

Complete collapse: The remaining 18 holders exit, liquidity is withdrawn, and the token becomes worthless. Given the structural anomalies and distribution patterns, this is the most probable outcome.

  • 90% holder collapse already underway
  • 66.1% sell pressure with net outflow
  • Mutable contract allows rug pull at any time
  • No fundamental value proposition or community
  • Anomalous token structure undermines legitimacy

GeneratedJul 7, 01:19 PM
Data freshnessData appears current as of 2026-07-07T13:00 UTC based on the most recent OHLC candle timestamp. However, multiple internal inconsistencies (contradictory 24h price change, OHLC values far below current price, anomalous supply figures) suggest data quality issues.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint: CtuShQdgEYN7S3raAxJi2QBnpobWea3pv9PaGyRgpump)
  • Price feed (USD and native WSOL)
  • OHLC hourly candles (9 candles, 2026-07-07T03:00–13:00 UTC)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics (current count, acquisition method, distribution)
  • Historical holder series (30 days daily, 2026-06-07 through 2026-07-06)
  • Top holders data (unavailable — no data returned)
  • Sniper analysis (unavailable — no data returned)
  • PumpSwap pair data (pair: 4N2pE1UCuR3ELp5C7vsRW6d44wqgBc12VduBGNkAKpzj)

Limitations

  • Top holder data is unavailable — whale concentration and individual holder behavior cannot be assessed
  • Sniper data is unavailable — early buyer behavior and smart money signals cannot be quantified
  • Total supply of 1 (0 decimals) is structurally inconsistent with observed multi-party trading — data may be corrupted or misleading
  • Contradictory 24h price change figures (+2,266% vs 0%) across data fields undermine price analysis reliability
  • Current reported price ($0.000843) is ~10x above all OHLC candle highs — possible data feed lag or manipulation
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
  • 30 consecutive days of zero holder change in historical data is anomalous and may indicate data collection issues
  • No social links or external information available to corroborate on-chain data
  • Candle [1] Low value ($0.000633) exceeds its High ($0.000087) — physically impossible, indicating a data error in the OHLC feed

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. The data analyzed contains multiple severe inconsistencies and anomalies that significantly reduce analytical confidence. This token exhibits characteristics consistent with high-risk speculative assets and potential fraudulent schemes. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Always conduct your own due diligence before making any investment decision.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (0 decimals)

Key Risks

•Total supply of 1 (0 decimals) is structurally anomalous and inconsistent with observed trading activity
•Holder count collapsed 90% (181 → 18) in under 24 hours while price spiked — classic pump-and-dump signal
•Contradictory price data: 24h change shown as both +2,266% and 0% in different data fields
•Current price ($0.000843) is ~10x above all OHLC candle highs — extreme data inconsistency

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper activity. The overall trading pattern — a sharp price spike with dominant sell pressure (66.1%), collapsing holder count (-910% in 24h), and high sell volume ($100.68K vs $51.56K buy volume) — is consistent with early buyers distributing into retail demand. However, without sniper data, this cannot be confirmed quantitatively.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — sniper analysis endpoint returned no data for this token.

Unknown due to missing sniper data. The sharp holder decline from 181 to 18 suggests early participants have largely exited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Hex on Solana (Hex)?

The token has experienced an extreme intraday spike (candle [9] opened at ~$0.0000322 and recent candles show prices near $0.000087, with the current price at $0.000843 — a level far above all OHLC candle data provided, suggesting the price feed may be stale or manipulated). Sell pressure dominates at 66.1%. With only 18 holders remaining and a collapsing holder base, further downside is the most probable short-term outcome. The OHLC data shows the highest candle high at ~$0.000633 (candle [1] L field appears anomalous — likely a data error), with a realistic recent high around $0.000087. The current reported price of $0.000843 is ~10x above the highest OHLC candle value, which is a major inconsistency. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000032 to $0.000087.

Is Hex a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.5/100. This token is NOT suitable for any investor. The combination of structural anomalies (1-token supply, 0 decimals), data inconsistencies, collapsing holder base, dominant sell pressure, mutable unverified contract, and patterns consistent with pump-and-dump activity make this an extremely high-risk asset. Only those prepared to lose 100% of their investment should consider any interaction with this token, and even then, the risk-reward profile is deeply unfavorable.

How are Hex holders trending?

Hex on Solana currently has 18 holders and is declining (24h: -163, 7d: -163, 30d: -163). The historical holder series shows exactly 181 holders with zero net change every single day from 2026-06-07 through 2026-07-06 — 30 consecutive days of complete stasis. This is highly abnormal for any legitimate token and suggests either the holder tracking was non-functional, the token was dormant/inactive, or the data is unreliable. The sudden drop to 18 holders (a loss of 163, or -90%) coinciding with the price spike is a severe red flag. Growth is not accelerating — it is sharply declining.

What does sniper activity look like for Hex?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding Hex?

Total supply of 1 (0 decimals) is structurally anomalous and inconsistent with observed trading activity • Holder count collapsed 90% (181 → 18) in under 24 hours while price spiked — classic pump-and-dump signal • Contradictory price data: 24h change shown as both +2,266% and 0% in different data fields

← Back to all predictions

Track Hex