CHIKI MONSTERS Price Today & AI Analysis

CHIKISolanaAnalysis as of Jun 19, 2026

$0.0₅4249

-0.01% 24h

Contract

Live

CPYrgdAYWFQD74ZtsR8mEBWW7qnrXnegcn7gDMobpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

175

Market cap

$4,242

At a $1M market cap, $CHIKI would be $0.001002 (236x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is CHIKI a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 1

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

7.2%11 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about CHIKI

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

BombardinoBombardino Crocodilo$0.0₅2551+0.0%MC $2.5K

SS$0.0₅2230+0.0%MC $2.2K

MOOBULLMoo bull$0.0₅2515+0.0%MC $2.5K

TNUTTrench Nut$0.0₅1972+0.0%MC $2.0K

ScribbankScribblebank$0.0₅2082+0.0%MC $2.1K

uniuni$0.008895-66.1%MC $8.90M

CHIKI MONSTERS: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-19 15:47 UTC

Holder addresses

505

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$58,852.89

How concentrated is CHIKI MONSTERS ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 505 addresses (2026-06-19 15:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling CHIKI MONSTERS?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is CHIKI MONSTERS liquidity falling?: As of 2026-06-19 15:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $58,852.89. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-19 15:47 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 19, 03:47 PM UTC

FDV

$338,838

Liquidity

$58,852.89

Holders

505

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

CHIKI MONSTERS (CHIKI) is a very early-stage Solana memecoin/gaming token launched on PumpSwap with a total supply of ~999.6M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$339K. The token has experienced an explosive 439% price surge in the past 24 hours, driven almost entirely by sell-side pressure (81.8% sell volume). Holder count has grown rapidly from a stagnant base of 35 wallets (held flat for ~28 days) to 505 in the past 24–48 hours, suggesting a very recent viral event or coordinated pump. Top holder data and sniper data are unavailable, limiting concentration analysis. The token is extremely high risk.

Key points

Explosive 439% 24h price surge from a very low base
Holder count grew 93% in 7 days, almost entirely in the last 48 hours
Stagnant holder base of exactly 35 wallets for ~28 days prior to the surge — highly anomalous
Overwhelming sell pressure: 81.8% of 24h volume is sells (1,561 sell transactions vs 412 buys)
Very thin liquidity at $58.85K total, creating extreme slippage risk
Top holder and concentration data unavailable — cannot assess whale risk directly

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has already surged 439% in 24h and is showing 230% gain in the last hour alone, but sell pressure dominates at 81.8% of volume. The OHLC data shows a sharp spike followed by a close well below the high (candle [1]: opened at $0.0001242, hit a high of $0.0001242, then closed at $0.0000606 — a bearish close near the low). With thin liquidity ($58.85K) and overwhelming sell transactions (1,561 vs 412 buys), a sharp retracement is the most probable short-term outcome.

Target low

$0.000044

Target high

$0.000175

Support: $0.000044 (candle [2] low), $0.000061 (candle [1] close / candle [2] open)
Resistance: $0.000124 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close), $0.000175 (candle [2] high — recent spike top)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Without a verified product, meaningful liquidity, or sustained organic holder growth, the medium-term outlook is bearish. The token sat dormant with exactly 35 holders for 28 days before the recent pump, which is a classic pump-and-dump setup. Sustained price appreciation would require real utility delivery, exchange listings, or continued community growth — none of which are evidenced in the current data.

Catalysts

Delivery of the described 3D voxel game world and SOL reward mechanics
Significant liquidity additions to reduce slippage risk
Organic holder growth beyond the current pump-driven spike
Broader Solana memecoin/gaming sector momentum

Bullish factors

439% price surge demonstrates strong short-term speculative interest
Holder count grew from 35 to 505 (+470) in ~48 hours — rapid community formation
5m price change of +29.6% and 1h change of +230.8% show active momentum
Gaming/utility narrative (3D voxel world, SOL rewards) could attract speculative buyers

Bearish factors

81.8% of 24h volume is sell pressure ($111.31K sells vs $24.83K buys)
1,561 sell transactions vs only 412 buy transactions in 24h
Token was completely stagnant (35 holders, zero change) for 28 consecutive days before the pump — classic pre-pump dormancy
Total liquidity is only $58.85K — extremely thin, high slippage risk
Top holder data unavailable — cannot rule out extreme concentration
Unverified contract, unknown update authority
Price closed near the low of candle [1], indicating distribution at the top

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available for technical analysis, (2) top holder and sniper data are unavailable, (3) the token is extremely new with a very short price history, and (4) the 6h and 24h price change fields both show 0% in the analytics section despite the 24h metadata showing +439%, suggesting data inconsistency.

CHIKI call history

Full track record →

Jun 19bearish@ $0.000339

24h-82.2%

7d-96.3%

30d-95.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: CPYrgd...pump
Total Supply: 999,586,034

Key Risks

Extreme sell pressure: 81.8% of 24h volume is sells, with 1,561 sell transactions vs 412 buys
Token was completely dormant (35 holders, zero change) for 28 consecutive days before the pump — classic pump-and-dump setup
Top holder data unavailable — cannot assess concentration or insider selling
Total liquidity of only $58.85K creates extreme slippage and exit risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (14:00 UTC): O=$0.0000606, H=$0.0001750, L=$0.0000436, C=$0.0001248 — a large bullish candle with a long lower wick, suggesting a volatile spike with recovery. Candle [1] (15:00 UTC): O=$0.0001242, H=$0.0001242, L=$0.0000983, C=$0.0000606 — a bearish candle that opened at the high and closed near the low, a strong bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern indicating distribution and selling pressure at the top. The sequence shows a pump followed by immediate distribution.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The most recent candle is strongly bearish, closing at $0.0000606 after opening at $0.0001242 — a ~51% intracandle decline. The prior candle was bullish but with extreme volatility. With only 2 candles available, medium-term trend is classified as sideways given the 28-day dormancy period prior to the recent spike.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

18%

Sell

82%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000061 (candle [1] close, candle [2] open)

Major support

$0.000044 (candle [2] absolute low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000124 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close)

Major resistance

$0.000175 (candle [2] spike high — recent all-time high)

The $0.000044 level represents the lowest traded price in the available data and is the key support floor. The $0.000061 level is a pivot between the two candles. Resistance sits at $0.000124 (the open of the bearish candle) and $0.000175 (the spike top). A failure to reclaim $0.000124 would likely lead to a retest of $0.000044.

Notable patterns

Bearish shooting star / bearish engulfing on candle [1]: opened at the high ($0.0001242) and closed near the low ($0.0000606) — strong distribution signal
High-volume bearish candle following a bullish spike — classic pump-and-dump candle sequence
28-day price dormancy followed by a vertical spike — consistent with coordinated pump activity
Candle [2] lower wick to $0.0000436 suggests a brief capitulation before the pump, followed by recovery

Liquidity

$58,852.89

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Market health is poor. Total liquidity of $58.85K is extremely shallow relative to the 24h trading volume of ~$136K, meaning large trades will experience severe slippage. The net flow is strongly negative: $111.31K in sell volume vs $24.83K in buy volume represents an 81.8% sell dominance. There are 2.57x more sellers (571) than buyers (222), and 3.79x more sell transactions (1,561) than buy transactions (412). This is a clear outflow environment. The FDV of $331–339K against $58.85K liquidity gives a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~17.8%, which is low but not unusual for a very early PumpSwap token. The pair trades on PumpSwap (ACvdA6HU6ZCqDu7RaBhU5T8vhH5HWUfjGH6rxyA8wGq), a decentralized venue with no guaranteed liquidity depth.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,586,034

FDV

$338,838

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price surged 439% in 24h and 230% in 1h, with a 51% intracandle decline on the most recent hourly candle. Extreme volatility is confirmed by the OHLC data and price change metrics.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $58.85K against $136K+ in 24h trading volume. Large trades will cause severe slippage. The shallow liquidity pool on PumpSwap provides minimal price support.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme sell pressure: 81.8% of 24h volume is sells, with 1,561 sell transactions vs 412 buys
Token was completely dormant (35 holders, zero change) for 28 consecutive days before the pump — classic pump-and-dump setup
Top holder data unavailable — cannot assess concentration or insider selling
Total liquidity of only $58.85K creates extreme slippage and exit risk
Unverified contract with unknown authority status
No evidence of delivered product despite gaming/utility claims
Price already showing sharp reversal from the pump high (51% intracandle decline on most recent candle)

Mitigating factors

Token metadata marked as immutable ('mutable: false') — metadata cannot be changed
PumpFun launch mechanism typically includes automatic LP burn upon graduation
Rapid holder growth (35 to 505 in ~48h) shows genuine speculative interest
Gaming/utility narrative (3D voxel world, SOL rewards) provides a potential long-term story
Social links present (Twitter, website, Moralis) suggesting some level of project presence

Suitable for

Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits multiple high-risk characteristics including extreme volatility, thin liquidity, dominant sell pressure, anomalous pre-pump dormancy, and unavailable concentration data. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without a strict risk management strategy.

CHIKI MONSTERS is a high-risk, early-stage speculative token that has experienced a violent pump with dominant sell pressure. The investment case hinges entirely on whether the recent price action represents the beginning of a sustained trend or (more likely, given the data) a classic pump-and-dump. The 28-day dormancy followed by explosive growth is the single most concerning data point. Any investment must be treated as pure speculation with high probability of significant loss.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

CHIKI becomes a legitimate gaming token with a delivered 3D voxel product, attracting a sustained community. The current pump is the beginning of a broader trend, holder growth continues organically, and liquidity deepens as the project gains visibility.

Successful delivery of the 3D voxel game world and SOL reward mechanics
Continued organic holder growth beyond the current speculative spike
Significant liquidity additions reducing slippage risk
Broader Solana gaming/memecoin sector tailwinds
Influencer or community-driven viral adoption

Base Case

The token experiences a partial retracement from the pump high, stabilizing at a lower level with a small but active community. Price consolidates in the $0.000044–$0.000124 range. The project either delivers minimal utility or fades into low-activity status, with holders gradually declining as speculators exit.

Some organic community forms around the gaming narrative
Liquidity remains thin but stable
No major rug pull or complete abandonment
Price finds support near the candle [2] low of $0.000044
Holder count stabilizes between 200–400 after the speculative wave passes

Bear Case

High probability

The current pump is a coordinated pump-and-dump. Early holders (the original 35 wallets) distribute their holdings into the FOMO-driven buying, price collapses back toward or below pre-pump levels (~$0.000044 or lower), and the token returns to dormancy or is abandoned.

28-day dormancy with exactly 35 holders strongly suggests coordinated pre-pump accumulation
81.8% sell pressure and 571 sellers vs 222 buyers confirms active distribution
Bearish shooting star candle pattern on the most recent hourly candle
Thin $58.85K liquidity cannot absorb sustained selling
No verified product or utility delivery evidenced in the data

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 19, 03:47 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-19 15:47 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Moralis token metadata API
PumpSwap on-chain price feed
Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles)
Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell breakdown, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and historical holder series (30 days daily)
Top 20 holder list (unavailable)
Sniper analysis (unavailable)

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
Top 20 holder data unavailable — cannot assess concentration, whale behavior, or insider holdings
Sniper analysis data unavailable — cannot assess early buyer PnL or dump risk from snipers
Supply concentration metrics show 0% for top 10 and top 100, which is likely a data artifact
Update authority status is 'unknown' — cannot confirm mint/freeze authority renouncement
Price change fields for 6h and 24h show 0% in analytics despite 24h metadata showing +439% — data inconsistency noted
The token is extremely new with very limited price history, making predictions highly speculative
No independent verification of the described gaming product or utility

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially early-stage tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analyst has no position in CHIKI and receives no compensation from the project.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is CHIKI MONSTERS (CHIKI) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell CHIKI MONSTERS (CHIKI)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is CHIKI MONSTERS ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 505 addresses (2026-06-19 15:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling CHIKI MONSTERS?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is CHIKI MONSTERS liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-19 15:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $58,852.89. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for CHIKI MONSTERS (CHIKI)?

Is CHIKI a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits multiple high-risk characteristics including extreme volatility, thin liquidity, dominant sell pressure, anomalous pre-pump dormancy, and unavailable concentration data. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without a strict risk management strategy.

What are the key risks of holding CHIKI?

Extreme sell pressure: 81.8% of 24h volume is sells, with 1,561 sell transactions vs 412 buys • Token was completely dormant (35 holders, zero change) for 28 consecutive days before the pump — classic pump-and-dump setup • Top holder data unavailable — cannot assess concentration or insider selling