Scribbank

Scribblebank Price Prediction 2026

Scribbank
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 24, 2026

CQ6jfDBTweXRkyQPsfUJYfvBw68ixNg9mzesYQN9pump

$0.051451

FDV $1,450

LiveContract:CQ6jfDBTweXRkyQPsfUJYfvBw68ixNg9mzesYQN9pumpChain:SolanaHolders:59Market cap:$1,450

More tokens on Solana

MOOBULL

MOOBULL

Moo bull

$0.0516210.0%
MC $1.6K
TNUT

TNUT

Trench Nut

$0.0514450.0%
MC $1.4K
WORLDKINS

WORLDKINS

World Kintara Coin

$0.0523100.0%
MC $2.3K
MOONPEPE

MOONPEPE

MOONPEPE

$0.0522280.0%
MC $2.2K
SOLNUT

SOLNUT

SOLANA NUT

$0.0521350.5%
MC $2.1K
arc

arc

AI Rig Complex

$0.060614.9%
MC $60.63M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Scribbank

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of May 24, 08:17 AM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$0

Holders

686

Snipers

44

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Scribblebank (Scribbank) is an extremely new PumpFun-launched Solana memecoin (mint: CQ6jfDBTweXRkyQPsfUJYfvBw68ixNg9mzesYQN9pump) that appears to have launched within the last 24 hours, given that all 686 holders were acquired within the past hour. The token trades on PumpSwap at ~$0.0001195 with an 81.4% 24h price gain, but exhibits severe data anomalies: the reported total supply is '1' with percentage holdings in the quadrillions, suggesting a decimal/formatting issue in the on-chain data. Liquidity is reported as $0.00, raising serious concerns about tradability and exit risk. The token has no verified contract, no social links, no description, and a mutable metadata authority — all hallmarks of an extremely high-risk speculative asset.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Launched within the last 24 hours — all 686 holders acquired simultaneously in a single burst
Severe on-chain data anomalies: total supply reported as '1' with holder percentages in quadrillions, indicating a decimals/formatting discrepancy
Zero reported on-chain liquidity ($0.00) despite ~$324K in 24h combined buy/sell volume
81.4% price surge in 24h driven by speculative momentum on PumpSwap
20 identified snipers, majority in profit — elevated early-buyer dump risk

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token just posted an 81.4% gain in 24h but is already showing a -6.3% decline in the last 5 minutes. With $0 reported liquidity, 20 snipers mostly in profit, and sell volume ($165.94K) slightly exceeding buy volume ($158.69K), short-term price action is likely to be volatile and skewed to the downside as early buyers take profits. The hourly candle [1] shows a bearish close (O: $0.0001417, C: $0.0001195) — a red candle after the spike.

Target low$0.000032
Target high$0.000143
Support: $0.0000328 (candle [2] open / session low), $0.0001195 (current price / candle [1] close)
Resistance: $0.0001417 (candle [1] open / recent high), $0.0001432 (candle [2] high — all-time high observed)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Without verified contract status, social presence, liquidity depth, or a clear use case, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. Memecoin launches of this type typically see rapid pump-and-dump cycles. If sniper wallets continue to sell, the price could retrace to near-launch levels or collapse entirely.

Catalysts
  • Sniper profit-taking exhaustion could stabilize price temporarily
  • Any viral social media attention could trigger a secondary pump
  • Broader Solana memecoin market sentiment

Bullish factors

  • Strong 81.4% 24h price gain showing speculative demand
  • 1,360 buys vs 1,489 sells — relatively balanced, not a one-sided dump yet
  • 905 unique buyers vs 621 unique sellers — more buyers than sellers by wallet count
  • PumpSwap listing provides some accessibility

Bearish factors

  • Zero reported on-chain liquidity — extreme slippage and exit risk
  • All 686 holders acquired in a single burst — no organic growth history
  • Sell volume ($165.94K) exceeds buy volume ($158.69K)
  • 20 snipers, majority in profit, representing significant overhang
  • No verified contract, no social links, no description, mutable metadata
  • Token is less than 24 hours old with no established community
  • -6.3% price drop in last 5 minutes at time of analysis
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) severe data anomalies in supply/holder percentage figures making quantitative modeling unreliable; (2) zero reported liquidity contradicting observed trading volume; (3) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis; (4) token is less than 24 hours old with no track record.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, severely limiting technical analysis. Candle [2] (07:00 UTC): O: $0.0000328, H: $0.0001432, L: $0.0000328, C: $0.0001380 — a massive bullish candle with a long lower wick, representing the initial launch pump (+320% intra-hour). Candle [1] (08:00 UTC): O: $0.0001417, H: $0.0001417, L: $0.0001195, C: $0.0001195 — a bearish red candle with no upper wick, indicating sellers took control immediately after the peak. The open of candle [1] equals its high, and the close equals its low — a full bearish candle suggesting distribution pressure after the pump.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 49%Sell 51%

Short-term trend has turned bearish after the initial pump candle. The second hourly candle is a full red candle closing at its low ($0.0001195), and the 5-minute price change is -6.3%. Medium-term trend is indeterminate given only 2 candles of history — classified as sideways pending more data.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0001195 (candle [1] close / current price)
Major$0.0000328 (candle [2] open / session absolute low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0001417 (candle [1] open / recent swing high)
Major$0.0001432 (candle [2] all-time high)

The all-time high of $0.0001432 set in candle [2] represents the key resistance. Immediate support is the current price level of $0.0001195 (candle [1] close). A break below this level targets the candle [2] open at $0.0000328, which would represent an ~73% decline from current levels. The gap between $0.0000328 and $0.0001195 is essentially empty air with no consolidation history.

Notable patterns

  • Massive bullish launch candle (candle [2]): open equals low, close near high — classic pump initiation
  • Bearish full-body red candle (candle [1]): open equals high, close equals low — distribution/selling pressure post-pump
  • Bearish volume divergence: volume increased on the down candle
  • No consolidation or base formation — price went straight up then straight down

Total holders686
24h Δ+686
7d Δ+686
30d Δ+686
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

All 686 holders were acquired within the last hour (100% growth in 1h, 24h, 7d, and 30d), coinciding with the token's launch pump. The historical holder series shows zero holders for all 30 prior days, confirming this is a brand-new token. Holder growth and price spike are perfectly correlated as both occurred simultaneously at launch — this is not organic growth but rather a single launch event.

The token has 686 total holders, all acquired via swap (683) or transfer (3) within the past hour. The 30-day historical holder data shows 0 holders for every prior day, confirming the token launched within the last hour of the analysis timestamp. There is no meaningful holder growth trend to analyze — this is a single-event launch. The distribution breakdown (0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, 0 octopus) contradicts the 686 holder count, suggesting a data classification issue. The supply concentration percentages (top 10 = 27,235,380,025,242,600%) are clearly corrupted/anomalous due to the total supply being reported as '1' with 0 decimals — actual balances in the hundreds of trillions suggest a massive decimal discrepancy in the metadata.

Top 10 hold100.00%
Top 100 hold100.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

BdUbi8urCxF4jwXBJ64HmmqHBf3CdZxSqoA3DQmFuUv9

DEX liquidity pool — this address matches the PumpSwap pair address listed in the price data (Pair: BdUbi8urCxF4jwXBJ64HmmqHBf3CdZxSqoA3DQmFuUv9), suggesting this is the primary liquidity pool contract holding the largest share of tokens

100.00%

AZjBNSkNNkgMfCpjPxETzPhAx4nwY9LoCRbc2b6cDHF1

Individual whale or early buyer — second largest holder with balance of 29.4T units

100.00%

4b9EHe1Xy3awLpfXz7F1G5s2kNBmUvnGfQ7tr6BJ9W5n

Individual whale or early buyer — third largest holder with balance of 20.3T units

100.00%

8enT274qRWXLFnReNd7mzv7DaDoUc4hxaVxxxFK8q6je

Individual whale or early buyer — fourth largest holder with balance of 19.4T units

100.00%

DNuaJgHNDzD1uRhM6MVj9x9w8eAxWvdbjtmcbiyscDP9

Individual whale or early buyer — fifth largest holder with balance of 18.6T units

100.00%

The whale map data is severely distorted by the total supply anomaly (reported as '1' with 0 decimals, while actual balances are in the hundreds of trillions). Percentage figures are meaningless as reported. The top holder (BdUbi8urCxF4jwXBJ64HmmqHBf3CdZxSqoA3DQmFuUv9) matches the PumpSwap pair address, classifying it as the DEX liquidity pool. The remaining top holders appear to be individual wallets that acquired tokens at launch. With 686 total holders and the top 20 holding enormous raw balances, concentration is extremely high. The distribution health is very concentrated. Sentiment is mixed — the LP holds the largest share (expected), while individual large holders represent significant dump risk.

Liquidity$0.00 (as reported — likely a data error given $324K+ in 24h volume)
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$158,690
Sell$165,940
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers905
Unique sellers621

The reported total liquidity of $0.00 is a critical red flag, though it may reflect a data reporting lag or API limitation for PumpSwap pools. Despite this, the token recorded $158.69K in buy volume and $165.94K in sell volume over 24h across 1,360 buys and 1,489 sells. Net flow is slightly negative (outflow), with sell volume exceeding buy volume by ~$7.25K. Notably, there are more unique buyers (905) than unique sellers (621), suggesting that while more wallets are buying, sellers are transacting in larger average sizes. The 5-minute price drop of -6.3% with zero reported liquidity implies extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position size. The PumpSwap pair (BdUbi8urCxF4jwXBJ64HmmqHBf3CdZxSqoA3DQmFuUv9) is the trading venue, but without confirmed liquidity depth data, large trades face severe price impact.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (as reported with 0 decimals — almost certainly a metadata error; actual token balances in the hundreds of trillions suggest the true supply is orders of magnitude larger, likely in the billions or trillions range with decimals misreported as 0)
FDV$0.00 (reported — unreliable due to supply data anomaly)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The tokenomics data contains severe anomalies. The total supply is reported as '1' with 0 decimals, yet individual holder balances show values in the tens of trillions (e.g., top holder balance: 114,042,027,338,695). This is a fundamental data inconsistency — either the decimals field is wrong (should likely be 6 or 9, making the true supply ~114 trillion base units = ~114 million tokens at 6 decimals), or the metadata is corrupted. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the token is marked as mutable, meaning metadata can be changed by whoever holds the update authority — a significant rug risk factor. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown from the provided data. The PumpFun mint address suffix ('pump') is consistent with a PumpFun launch, where mint authority is typically burned after bonding curve completion, but this cannot be confirmed from the data provided. The FDV of $0.00 is unreliable. Investors should treat all tokenomics figures with extreme caution.

Volatility
high

The token surged ~320% in a single hour then retraced, with a -6.3% move in 5 minutes. Only 2 hourly candles of price history exist. Extreme volatility is inherent to sub-24-hour PumpFun launches.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity reported as $0.00. Even if this is a data error, the shallow PumpSwap pool for a brand-new token means large trades will face severe slippage. Exit risk is very high for any position above a few hundred dollars.

Concentration
high

All 686 holders were acquired in a single launch event. The top holder is the DEX LP, and the next largest holders are individual wallets with enormous raw balances. Supply concentration is extreme, and the percentage data is corrupted by the total supply anomaly.

SniperDump
high

20 identified snipers, 17 of whom show positive realized PnL (ranging from +5.8% to +125%). Several snipers still hold positions (e.g., wallets with $264–$378 in remaining balance). The largest sniper sold $5,259 worth. Continued sniper selling represents a persistent overhang.

Authority
high

Update authority is 'unknown' and the token is marked as mutable — metadata can be altered. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. No verified contract. These factors create significant rug pull and manipulation risk.

Key risks

  • Zero reported on-chain liquidity — extreme exit risk
  • Token is less than 24 hours old with no track record, community, or use case
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector
  • 20 snipers mostly in profit with potential to dump at any time
  • Severe on-chain data anomalies (supply reported as '1', percentages in quadrillions) — data integrity concerns
  • No social links, no description, no verified contract — anonymous and unverified project
  • Sell volume exceeds buy volume; price already declining from peak
  • PumpFun launch mechanics favor early buyers and insiders over retail

Mitigating factors

  • PumpFun launch mechanism provides some standardization and initial liquidity bootstrapping
  • 905 unique buyers in 24h shows some genuine market interest
  • 81.4% price gain demonstrates speculative demand exists
  • More unique buyers (905) than sellers (621) by wallet count
  • Some snipers have already exited, reducing future overhang
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand PumpFun memecoin mechanics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of monitoring positions in real-time. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana memecoin trading. Position sizes should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket only).

Scribblebank (Scribbank) is a brand-new, anonymous PumpFun memecoin with no fundamentals, no verified contract, no social presence, and severe on-chain data anomalies. The only investment thesis is purely speculative momentum — the token pumped 81.4% at launch and may attract further speculative interest. However, the risk/reward is extremely unfavorable for new entrants given zero liquidity, sniper overhang, and declining price momentum.

Bull case (low)

Secondary pump driven by viral social media attention or broader Solana memecoin market momentum causes a 2–5x move from current levels, allowing early buyers to exit profitably.

  • Viral social media catalyst (Twitter/X, Telegram) drives new buyer inflow
  • Broader Solana memecoin season lifts all boats
  • Sniper selling exhausts quickly, removing overhead supply
  • Token gains listing on a memecoin aggregator or influencer attention

Base case

Token experiences continued volatility over the next 24–48 hours with gradual price erosion as sniper selling and early holder profit-taking outpace new buyer inflow. Price stabilizes at a fraction of the peak (~$0.00003–$0.00006) with minimal trading activity.

  • No major social media catalyst emerges
  • Sniper selling continues at current pace
  • Liquidity remains shallow, limiting large trades
  • 686 holder base does not grow significantly beyond launch cohort

Bear case (high)

Sniper wallets and large early holders dump their positions into any remaining buy pressure, price collapses 80–99% from current levels back toward launch price ($0.0000328 or lower), and the token becomes illiquid and abandoned.

  • 17 of 20 snipers in profit with no incentive to hold
  • Zero reported liquidity means any selling causes outsized price impact
  • No community, no use case, no social presence to sustain interest
  • Mutable metadata could be exploited by unknown authority
  • Historical pattern: >95% of PumpFun launches fail within 7 days

GeneratedMay 24, 08:17 AM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-05-24T08:00 UTC. Token appears to have launched within the hour prior to this timestamp.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint: CQ6jfDBTweXRkyQPsfUJYfvBw68ixNg9mzesYQN9pump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (BdUbi8urCxF4jwXBJ64HmmqHBf3CdZxSqoA3DQmFuUv9)
  • Hourly OHLC price data (2 candles: 07:00–08:00 UTC, 2026-05-24)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • 30-day historical holder series
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • Sniper analysis (20 snipers, first 1,000 blocks)

Limitations

  • Total supply reported as '1' with 0 decimals is almost certainly a metadata error — all percentage calculations based on this figure are invalid
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 may be a data lag/API issue for PumpSwap — actual liquidity depth unknown
  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely limited
  • Sniper balance and total sniped USD amounts are unknown — sniper concentration cannot be precisely quantified
  • All 30 days of historical holder data show 0 holders, confirming token is brand new but preventing trend analysis
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are unknown — rug risk cannot be fully assessed
  • Distribution classification (0 whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus) contradicts 686 holder count — data classification system may not apply to this token type
  • Holder percentage figures (e.g., top 10 = 27,235,380,025,242,600%) are clearly corrupted and cannot be used for concentration analysis

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially newly launched memecoins, carry extreme risk of total loss. The data anomalies identified in this report significantly reduce analytical confidence. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Past price performance (81.4% gain) is not indicative of future results. This report was generated by an AI system and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (as reported with 0 decimals — almost certainly a metadata error; actual token balances in the hundreds of trillions suggest the true supply is orders of magnitude larger, likely in the billions or trillions range with decimals misreported as 0)

Key Risks

•Zero reported on-chain liquidity — extreme exit risk
•Token is less than 24 hours old with no track record, community, or use case
•Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector
•20 snipers mostly in profit with potential to dump at any time

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

20 snipers were identified in the first 1,000 blocks. Sniper concentration as a percentage of total supply cannot be computed precisely due to unknown sniper balance data and the total supply anomaly (reported as '1'). Of the 20 snipers, 17 show positive realized PnL percentages, with gains ranging from +5.8% to +125.0%. Only 2 snipers (wallets [5] and [7]) show negative PnL (-5.2% and -10.0% respectively). One sniper (wallet [2]) shows 0% PnL with a $0 balance, suggesting a full exit at breakeven or data gap. The majority of snipers are in profit and several still hold positions, representing a meaningful overhang of potential sell pressure.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateMostly In Profit
Sell-through rateModerate
Profit-taking risk
high

Sniper balances unknown; sell amounts range from $1 to $5,259 across 20 identified snipers. Largest seller: wallet 5K3N1vqmdgPNfk79SXJdmdhbR2q5KvcunZiWd6D7iTUT sold $5,259 (realized PnL: +5.8%). Second largest: 3vNb7Lo9Xc8DBKhBfvzq8q1zUUca42BTDATRJmYrwrJK sold $2,350 (+76.9%). Total identified sniper sells: ~$11,211.

Mixed-to-bearish. Most snipers are in profit and several have already sold significant portions. The largest sniper sell ($5,259 at +5.8% PnL) suggests some are taking modest profits quickly. High-PnL snipers (125%, 110.6%, 100%, 91%) who have already sold represent successful exits. Remaining holders with positive unrealized PnL (e.g., wallets [8] $378 balance, [9] $264 balance) may sell at any time.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Scribblebank (Scribbank)?

The token just posted an 81.4% gain in 24h but is already showing a -6.3% decline in the last 5 minutes. With $0 reported liquidity, 20 snipers mostly in profit, and sell volume ($165.94K) slightly exceeding buy volume ($158.69K), short-term price action is likely to be volatile and skewed to the downside as early buyers take profits. The hourly candle [1] shows a bearish close (O: $0.0001417, C: $0.0001195) — a red candle after the spike. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000032 to $0.000143.

Is Scribbank a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand PumpFun memecoin mechanics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of monitoring positions in real-time. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana memecoin trading. Position sizes should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket only).

How are Scribbank holders trending?

Scribblebank currently has 686 holders and is growing (24h: 686, 7d: 686, 30d: 686). The token has 686 total holders, all acquired via swap (683) or transfer (3) within the past hour. The 30-day historical holder data shows 0 holders for every prior day, confirming the token launched within the last hour of the analysis timestamp. There is no meaningful holder growth trend to analyze — this is a single-event launch. The distribution breakdown (0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, 0 octopus) contradicts the 686 holder count, suggesting a data classification issue. The supply concentration percentages (top 10 = 27,235,380,025,242,600%) are clearly corrupted/anomalous due to the total supply being reported as '1' with 0 decimals — actual balances in the hundreds of trillions suggest a massive decimal discrepancy in the metadata.

What does sniper activity look like for Scribbank?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "mostly_in_profit" and sell-through rate "moderate". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding Scribbank?

Zero reported on-chain liquidity — extreme exit risk • Token is less than 24 hours old with no track record, community, or use case • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector

← Back to all predictions

Track Scribbank