Granular

Granular Price Today & AI Analysis

Granular
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 18, 2026

CKkuaqSiezUfHesGPTgiAdSGtYuxcEEjBxbCmiNgpump

$0.052485

-2.72%

FDV $2,484

LiveContract:CKkuaqSiezUfHesGPTgiAdSGtYuxcEEjBxbCmiNgpumpChain:SolanaHolders:409Market cap:$2,484

More tokens on Solana

Cancer

Cancer

Cancer Coin

$0.0519410.0%
MC $1.9K
🤖

🤖

🤖

$0.0519900.0%
MC $2.0K
DJT

DJT

Donald J. Trump

$0.05202612.2%
MC $2.0K
AALON

AALON

AALon

$0.0519870.0%
MC $2.0K
Bombardino

Bombardino

Bombardino Crocodilo

$0.0522610.0%
MC $2.3K
fone

fone

apeonfone

$0.033130.4%
MC $32.73M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Granular

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 18, 07:19 AM
FDV

$89,459

Liquidity

$39,331

Holders

949

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Granular (GRANULAR) is a Pump.fun-launched Solana memecoin (mint: CKkuaqSiezUfHesGPTgiAdSGtYuxcEEjBxbCmiNgpump) with a total supply of 1 billion tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$89.5K at the time of analysis. The token has experienced a sharp 41.76% price spike in the last 24 hours, but the data reveals severe red flags: extremely thin liquidity ($39.33K), heavily skewed sell pressure (69% sell / 31% buy), a massive holder anomaly (historical data shows only 16 holders for 30 consecutive days, yet current metrics report 949 holders with +933 added in the last hour), and zero top-holder data available. These inconsistencies strongly suggest data anomalies, possible wash trading, or a very early-stage token with unreliable on-chain indexing. The token is unverified, has no contract audit, and carries very high risk.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme 24h price spike of +41.76% on very thin $39.33K liquidity
Severe data inconsistency: 30 days of flat 16 holders followed by a sudden +933 holder jump in 1 hour
Heavily sell-dominated trading: 69% sell pressure, 3,189 sells vs 1,324 buys in 24h
No top holder data, no supply concentration data, and no sniper data available — extremely opaque ownership structure
Launched on PumpSwap (Pump.fun ecosystem), unverified contract, mutable=false

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–48 hours

The token has spiked +41.76% in 24h but faces overwhelming sell pressure (69% of volume). With only $39.33K in liquidity, even modest sell orders can cause severe price impact. The most recent hourly candle (07:00 UTC) shows a high of $0.0001127 and a close of $0.0000915, well below the wick high, indicating sellers are active at elevated prices. Short-term direction is bearish as profit-taking and sell dominance are likely to push price back toward the prior range.

Target low$0.000029
Target high$0.000113
Support: $0.0000650 (candle [1] low), $0.0000294 (candle [2] open/low — prior base)
Resistance: $0.0000915 (candle [1] close / current price area), $0.0001127 (candle [1] intraday high — upper wick resistance)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

Without a verified contract, meaningful liquidity depth, or a clear utility/narrative, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. The holder data anomaly (16 holders for 30 days, then +933 in 1 hour) raises serious concerns about organic adoption. If sell pressure continues to dominate and liquidity remains shallow, the token risks returning to near-launch prices.

Catalysts
  • Genuine community/narrative development that drives organic buyer interest
  • Liquidity deepening above $200K to reduce slippage risk
  • Resolution of holder data anomalies confirming real organic growth
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting all small-caps

Bullish factors

  • Strong 24h price appreciation of +41.76% signals speculative interest
  • 5-minute price momentum is positive (+1.63%)
  • 1,056 unique wallets active in 24h suggests some breadth of participation
  • Mutable=false metadata reduces one vector of rug risk

Bearish factors

  • 69% sell pressure dominates 24h volume ($153.38K sells vs $68.87K buys)
  • Liquidity of only $39.33K creates extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position
  • Holder data anomaly (16 holders for 30 days, +933 in 1 hour) is a major red flag for data integrity or manipulation
  • No top holder data — ownership concentration is completely opaque
  • Unverified contract, no audit, no description, update authority unknown
  • FDV of $89.5K is micro-cap with no fundamental backing
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis; (2) severe data inconsistencies in holder metrics that undermine trend analysis; (3) no top holder or sniper data to assess distribution; (4) extremely thin liquidity making price highly manipulable.

Granular call history

Full track record →
Jul 18bearish
24h-94.8%
7d-97.2%
30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (06:00 UTC): O=$0.0000294, H=$0.0000886, L=$0.0000294, C=$0.0000697 — a strong bullish candle with a large upper wick, opening at the low and closing near mid-range, suggesting initial buying enthusiasm met with selling. Candle [1] (07:00 UTC): O=$0.0000707, H=$0.0001127, L=$0.0000650, C=$0.0000915 — price gapped up from the prior close, made a new high of $0.0001127, but closed at $0.0000915, well below the wick high. This upper-wick rejection pattern at the intraday high is bearish in the short term, indicating sellers absorbed the breakout attempt.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 31%Sell 69%

The 2-candle window shows a short-term uptrend from $0.0000294 to a high of $0.0001127, but with significant upper-wick rejections on both candles. Medium-term trend is indeterminate given only 2 data points; classified as sideways pending more data.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000650 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.0000294 (candle [2] open/low — launch base)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000915 (candle [1] close — current price area)
Major$0.0001127 (candle [1] intraday high — upper wick)

The $0.0000650 level (candle [1] low) is the nearest support. A break below this opens a path to the $0.0000294 base. On the upside, $0.0000915 (current close) acts as near-term resistance, with the major wick high at $0.0001127 being the key level bulls need to reclaim and hold.

Notable patterns

  • Upper-wick rejection on candle [1]: price reached $0.0001127 but closed at $0.0000915 — bearish shooting star / wick rejection
  • Upper-wick rejection on candle [2]: price reached $0.0000886 but closed at $0.0000697 — consistent seller presence at highs
  • Gap-up open on candle [1] relative to candle [2] close ($0.0000707 open vs $0.0000697 close) — minor continuation gap
  • Only 2 candles available — pattern analysis is severely limited and should not be relied upon for trading decisions

Total holders949
24h Δ+933
7d Δ+933
30d Δ+933
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The reported +933 holder surge in 1 hour coincides with the 41.76% price spike. However, the historical data shows exactly 16 holders every single day for 30 consecutive days (June 18 – July 17, 2026) with zero net change on any day. This is a severe data anomaly. Either the on-chain indexer was not tracking this token for 30 days and has now caught up, or the holder count data is unreliable. The apparent correlation between the price spike and holder surge cannot be trusted as organic.

The holder data presents a critical red flag. For 30 consecutive days (June 18 – July 17, 2026), the token showed exactly 16 holders with zero net change every day. Then, in a single 1-hour window, 933 new holders were added — representing a 5,831% increase. This pattern is inconsistent with organic growth and may indicate: (1) a data indexing lag where the provider only recently began tracking this token; (2) a coordinated wallet creation event; or (3) data corruption. The current reported total of 949 holders cannot be verified against the historical series. Investors should treat all holder metrics for this token as unreliable until confirmed by independent sources. Supply distribution data (whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus) all show 0, and top10/top100 concentration is reported as 0% — further evidence of incomplete data indexing.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

No top holder data is available for Granular. The API returned no entries for the top 20 holders, and supply concentration metrics show 0% for both top 10 and top 100 — which is almost certainly a data indexing issue rather than a genuine reflection of distribution. With 1 billion tokens in supply and only $39.33K in liquidity, the actual ownership structure is completely opaque. The absence of this data is itself a risk factor, as it prevents any assessment of whale concentration, insider holdings, or potential dump risk. Investors should assume concentration risk is HIGH until proven otherwise, given the token's micro-cap status and Pump.fun origin.

Liquidity$39,330
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$68,870
Sell$153,380
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers346
Unique sellers931

Liquidity is critically shallow at $39.33K on PumpSwap (pair: 9dK4r1ocurbq8fsSzADpAyPtzW3LqjFvuTFe2ggSYP7a). The FDV-to-liquidity ratio is approximately 2.27x, meaning the entire market cap is only ~2.3x the liquidity pool — extremely thin. Any position larger than a few hundred dollars will experience significant slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $153.38K in sells vs $68.87K in buys, a net outflow of ~$84.5K. The seller-to-buyer ratio is 2.69:1 (931 sellers vs 346 buyers), confirming distribution dominance. Despite the price spike, the market microstructure is bearish — more participants are exiting than entering. Total 24h volume of ~$222K is substantial relative to the $39.33K liquidity pool, indicating high turnover and volatility risk.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000 (1 billion)
FDV$89,458.70

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Granular has a total supply of 1 billion tokens with an FDV of ~$89.5K at current prices ($0.0000895/token). The token was launched via Pump.fun (mint address ends in 'pump'), which typically uses a bonding curve mechanism before graduating to a DEX. The metadata shows 'Mutable: false', which is a positive signal indicating token metadata cannot be changed. However, the update authority is listed as 'unknown', preventing a definitive assessment of mint and freeze authority status. On Pump.fun tokens, mint authority is typically burned upon bonding curve graduation, but this cannot be confirmed from the available data. The token is unverified (no contract verification), has no description, and social links (Twitter, website, Moralis) are listed but not evaluated. The micro-cap FDV of $89.5K means even small capital flows can cause extreme price volatility.

Volatility
high

Price moved from $0.0000294 to $0.0001127 (283% range) within 2 hours on $39.33K liquidity. 24h change of +41.76% on micro-cap with thin liquidity indicates extreme volatility. Any large sell order can cause catastrophic price drops.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $39.33K is critically shallow. The FDV/liquidity ratio of ~2.27x means the pool can be drained rapidly. High slippage expected on any trade above ~$500. 24h volume of ~$222K is 5.6x the liquidity pool size.

Concentration
high

No top holder data is available, making concentration completely opaque. Historical data showed only 16 holders for 30 days. The anomalous +933 holder spike in 1 hour cannot be verified. Pump.fun tokens frequently have insiders holding large undisclosed positions.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, preventing direct assessment. However, the 69% sell pressure, 2.69:1 seller-to-buyer ratio, and net outflow of ~$84.5K in 24h strongly suggest early holders or insiders are actively distributing into the price spike.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown' — cannot confirm mint or freeze authority status. 'Mutable: false' is a positive signal. Pump.fun tokens typically burn mint authority on graduation, but this is unconfirmed. The unverified contract adds additional uncertainty.

Key risks

  • Critically shallow liquidity ($39.33K) creates extreme price impact and exit risk
  • Severe holder data anomaly (16 holders for 30 days → +933 in 1 hour) suggests data manipulation or unreliable indexing
  • No top holder data — ownership concentration is completely opaque
  • Overwhelming sell pressure: 69% of 24h volume is sells, net outflow of ~$84.5K
  • Unverified contract with unknown update authority
  • Micro-cap FDV of $89.5K with no utility, no description, and no verified fundamentals
  • Pump.fun origin with potential for rapid price collapse post-bonding curve graduation

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable: false metadata reduces risk of metadata-based rug
  • Token is listed as 'possible spam: false' by the data provider
  • Social links (Twitter, website) exist, suggesting some level of project presence
  • 1,056 unique wallets active in 24h shows some breadth of participation
  • 5-minute momentum is positive (+1.63%), suggesting very short-term buying interest
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced crypto traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap Pump.fun memecoins, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are using only a small speculative allocation. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone seeking capital preservation. This is NOT financial advice.

Granular is a micro-cap Pump.fun memecoin with a 24h price spike of +41.76% but severe structural weaknesses: $39.33K liquidity, 69% sell pressure, opaque ownership, and deeply anomalous holder data. The risk/reward profile is extremely unfavorable for most investors. Any thesis for investment is purely speculative and momentum-based, with no fundamental backing.

Bull case (low)

Momentum continuation: The 41.76% price spike attracts further speculative attention, new buyers pile in, liquidity deepens, and the token achieves a 5–10x from current levels (~$0.00045–$0.00090) before a correction.

  • Viral social media attention driving new buyer inflows
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting micro-caps
  • Liquidity providers adding depth to reduce slippage
  • Genuine community formation around the Granular brand

Base case

Gradual fade: The initial excitement subsides, sell pressure continues to dominate, price drifts down 30–50% from current levels over the next 1–2 weeks, settling in the $0.000045–$0.000065 range as speculative interest wanes.

  • Sell pressure remains dominant but not catastrophic
  • Liquidity stays roughly stable at current thin levels
  • No major new catalyst (positive or negative) emerges
  • Holder base stabilizes around current ~949 level

Bear case (high)

Distribution collapse: Insiders and early holders continue selling into the price spike, liquidity is drained, and price collapses back to near-launch levels (~$0.0000294 or lower), representing a ~67% decline from current price.

  • Continued 69% sell pressure exhausts buyer demand
  • Shallow $39.33K liquidity unable to absorb sell orders
  • No fundamental utility or narrative to sustain interest
  • Holder data anomalies reflect wash trading or coordinated pump-and-dump activity

GeneratedJul 18, 07:19 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of analysis time. OHLC data covers only the 2 most recent hourly candles (06:00–08:00 UTC July 18, 2026). Historical holder data covers June 18 – July 17, 2026 (30 days daily). Sniper data unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics (pair: 9dK4r1ocurbq8fsSzADpAyPtzW3LqjFvuTFe2ggSYP7a)
  • Hourly OHLC price data (2 candles)
  • On-chain holder metrics and historical holder series (30 days)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely limited and unreliable
  • No top holder data returned — whale map and concentration analysis are based on absence of data, not confirmed figures
  • Holder data contains a severe anomaly (16 holders for 30 days, +933 in 1 hour) that undermines all holder trend analysis
  • No sniper data available — smart money signals cannot be assessed
  • Update authority is 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed
  • Supply concentration reported as 0% for top 10 and top 100 — almost certainly a data indexing issue, not reality
  • Token is unverified with no contract audit — on-chain behavior cannot be fully validated
  • FDV and price data may be subject to manipulation given thin liquidity

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap memecoins, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data used contains significant anomalies and gaps that limit analytical confidence. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

Key Risks

•Critically shallow liquidity ($39.33K) creates extreme price impact and exit risk
•Severe holder data anomaly (16 holders for 30 days → +933 in 1 hour) suggests data manipulation or unreliable indexing
•No top holder data — ownership concentration is completely opaque
•Overwhelming sell pressure: 69% of 24h volume is sells, net outflow of ~$84.5K

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for Granular. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. The absence of sniper data, combined with no top holder information and anomalous holder metrics, makes it impossible to assess early buyer behavior with confidence. The heavily sell-dominated 24h trading (3,189 sells vs 1,324 buys, 931 unique sellers vs 346 unique buyers) suggests that whoever holds supply is actively distributing rather than accumulating.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available for this token.

Unknown — no sniper or top holder data available. The 2.7x ratio of sellers to buyers (931 vs 346) in 24h implies early participants or insiders may be distributing into the price spike.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Granular (Granular)?

The token has spiked +41.76% in 24h but faces overwhelming sell pressure (69% of volume). With only $39.33K in liquidity, even modest sell orders can cause severe price impact. The most recent hourly candle (07:00 UTC) shows a high of $0.0001127 and a close of $0.0000915, well below the wick high, indicating sellers are active at elevated prices. Short-term direction is bearish as profit-taking and sell dominance are likely to push price back toward the prior range. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–48 hours), with a target range of $0.000029 to $0.000113.

Is Granular a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced crypto traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap Pump.fun memecoins, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are using only a small speculative allocation. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone seeking capital preservation. This is NOT financial advice.

How are Granular holders trending?

Granular currently has 949 holders and is growing (24h: 933, 7d: 933, 30d: 933). The holder data presents a critical red flag. For 30 consecutive days (June 18 – July 17, 2026), the token showed exactly 16 holders with zero net change every day. Then, in a single 1-hour window, 933 new holders were added — representing a 5,831% increase. This pattern is inconsistent with organic growth and may indicate: (1) a data indexing lag where the provider only recently began tracking this token; (2) a coordinated wallet creation event; or (3) data corruption. The current reported total of 949 holders cannot be verified against the historical series. Investors should treat all holder metrics for this token as unreliable until confirmed by independent sources. Supply distribution data (whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus) all show 0, and top10/top100 concentration is reported as 0% — further evidence of incomplete data indexing.

What does sniper activity look like for Granular?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding Granular?

Critically shallow liquidity ($39.33K) creates extreme price impact and exit risk • Severe holder data anomaly (16 holders for 30 days → +933 in 1 hour) suggests data manipulation or unreliable indexing • No top holder data — ownership concentration is completely opaque

← Back to all predictions

Track Granular