Granular Price Today & AI Analysis

GranularSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 18, 2026

$0.0₅2437

Contract

Live

CKkuaqSiezUfHesGPTgiAdSGtYuxcEEjBxbCmiNgpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

390

Market cap

$2,436

At a $1M market cap, $GRANULAR would be $0.001000 (411x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is Granular a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 16

Not checked

This contract has not been tested for honeypots or taxes yet.

The honeypot and tax test has not run on this contract yet, so no red flags here does not mean a clean contract. Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. Taxes come from a test trade through one pool and can change if the owner changes them.

Ask Unhosted AI about Granular

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

HeliumOnly Up$0.0₅5128+0.0%MC $5.1K

🤖🤖$0.0₅2843+0.0%MC $2.8K

CRATCRYING CAT$0.0₅3236+0.0%MC $3.2K

DJTDonald J. Trump$0.0₅2238+0.0%MC $2.2K

CardtopiaCardtopia$0.0₅3118+0.0%MC $3.1K

FTRFlying Tesla Roadster$0.003856+106.5%MC $3.71M

Granular: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-18 07:19 UTC

Holder addresses

949

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$39,330.59

How concentrated is Granular ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 949 addresses (2026-07-18 07:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Granular?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Granular liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-18 07:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $39,330.59. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-18 07:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 18, 07:19 AM UTC

FDV

$89,459

Liquidity

$39,330.59

Holders

949

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Granular (GRANULAR) is a Pump.fun-launched Solana memecoin (mint: CKkuaqSiezUfHesGPTgiAdSGtYuxcEEjBxbCmiNgpump) with a total supply of 1 billion tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$89.5K at the time of analysis. The token has experienced a sharp 41.76% price spike in the last 24 hours, but the data reveals severe red flags: extremely thin liquidity ($39.33K), heavily skewed sell pressure (69% sell / 31% buy), a massive holder anomaly (historical data shows only 16 holders for 30 consecutive days, yet current metrics report 949 holders with +933 added in the last hour), and zero top-holder data available. These inconsistencies strongly suggest data anomalies, possible wash trading, or a very early-stage token with unreliable on-chain indexing. The token is unverified, has no contract audit, and carries very high risk.

Key points

Extreme 24h price spike of +41.76% on very thin $39.33K liquidity
Severe data inconsistency: 30 days of flat 16 holders followed by a sudden +933 holder jump in 1 hour
Heavily sell-dominated trading: 69% sell pressure, 3,189 sells vs 1,324 buys in 24h
No top holder data, no supply concentration data, and no sniper data available — extremely opaque ownership structure
Launched on PumpSwap (Pump.fun ecosystem), unverified contract, mutable=false

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–48 hours

bearish

The token has spiked +41.76% in 24h but faces overwhelming sell pressure (69% of volume). With only $39.33K in liquidity, even modest sell orders can cause severe price impact. The most recent hourly candle (07:00 UTC) shows a high of $0.0001127 and a close of $0.0000915, well below the wick high, indicating sellers are active at elevated prices. Short-term direction is bearish as profit-taking and sell dominance are likely to push price back toward the prior range.

Target low

$0.000029

Target high

$0.000113

Support: $0.0000650 (candle [1] low), $0.0000294 (candle [2] open/low — prior base)
Resistance: $0.0000915 (candle [1] close / current price area), $0.0001127 (candle [1] intraday high — upper wick resistance)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

Without a verified contract, meaningful liquidity depth, or a clear utility/narrative, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. The holder data anomaly (16 holders for 30 days, then +933 in 1 hour) raises serious concerns about organic adoption. If sell pressure continues to dominate and liquidity remains shallow, the token risks returning to near-launch prices.

Catalysts

Genuine community/narrative development that drives organic buyer interest
Liquidity deepening above $200K to reduce slippage risk
Resolution of holder data anomalies confirming real organic growth
Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting all small-caps

Bullish factors

Strong 24h price appreciation of +41.76% signals speculative interest
5-minute price momentum is positive (+1.63%)
1,056 unique wallets active in 24h suggests some breadth of participation
Mutable=false metadata reduces one vector of rug risk

Bearish factors

69% sell pressure dominates 24h volume ($153.38K sells vs $68.87K buys)
Liquidity of only $39.33K creates extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position
Holder data anomaly (16 holders for 30 days, +933 in 1 hour) is a major red flag for data integrity or manipulation
No top holder data — ownership concentration is completely opaque
Unverified contract, no audit, no description, update authority unknown
FDV of $89.5K is micro-cap with no fundamental backing

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis; (2) severe data inconsistencies in holder metrics that undermine trend analysis; (3) no top holder or sniper data to assess distribution; (4) extremely thin liquidity making price highly manipulable.

Granular call history

Full track record →

Jul 18bearish@ $0.0000895

24h-94.8%

7d-97.2%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: CKkuaq...pump
Total Supply: 1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

Key Risks

Critically shallow liquidity ($39.33K) creates extreme price impact and exit risk
Severe holder data anomaly (16 holders for 30 days → +933 in 1 hour) suggests data manipulation or unreliable indexing
No top holder data — ownership concentration is completely opaque
Overwhelming sell pressure: 69% of 24h volume is sells, net outflow of ~$84.5K

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (06:00 UTC): O=$0.0000294, H=$0.0000886, L=$0.0000294, C=$0.0000697 — a strong bullish candle with a large upper wick, opening at the low and closing near mid-range, suggesting initial buying enthusiasm met with selling. Candle [1] (07:00 UTC): O=$0.0000707, H=$0.0001127, L=$0.0000650, C=$0.0000915 — price gapped up from the prior close, made a new high of $0.0001127, but closed at $0.0000915, well below the wick high. This upper-wick rejection pattern at the intraday high is bearish in the short term, indicating sellers absorbed the breakout attempt.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The 2-candle window shows a short-term uptrend from $0.0000294 to a high of $0.0001127, but with significant upper-wick rejections on both candles. Medium-term trend is indeterminate given only 2 data points; classified as sideways pending more data.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

31%

Sell

69%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000650 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.0000294 (candle [2] open/low — launch base)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000915 (candle [1] close — current price area)

Major resistance

$0.0001127 (candle [1] intraday high — upper wick)

The $0.0000650 level (candle [1] low) is the nearest support. A break below this opens a path to the $0.0000294 base. On the upside, $0.0000915 (current close) acts as near-term resistance, with the major wick high at $0.0001127 being the key level bulls need to reclaim and hold.

Notable patterns

Upper-wick rejection on candle [1]: price reached $0.0001127 but closed at $0.0000915 — bearish shooting star / wick rejection
Upper-wick rejection on candle [2]: price reached $0.0000886 but closed at $0.0000697 — consistent seller presence at highs
Gap-up open on candle [1] relative to candle [2] close ($0.0000707 open vs $0.0000697 close) — minor continuation gap
Only 2 candles available — pattern analysis is severely limited and should not be relied upon for trading decisions

Liquidity

$39,330.59

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $39.33K on PumpSwap (pair: 9dK4r1ocurbq8fsSzADpAyPtzW3LqjFvuTFe2ggSYP7a). The FDV-to-liquidity ratio is approximately 2.27x, meaning the entire market cap is only ~2.3x the liquidity pool — extremely thin. Any position larger than a few hundred dollars will experience significant slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $153.38K in sells vs $68.87K in buys, a net outflow of ~$84.5K. The seller-to-buyer ratio is 2.69:1 (931 sellers vs 346 buyers), confirming distribution dominance. Despite the price spike, the market microstructure is bearish — more participants are exiting than entering. Total 24h volume of ~$222K is substantial relative to the $39.33K liquidity pool, indicating high turnover and volatility risk.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

FDV

$89,458.70

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved from $0.0000294 to $0.0001127 (283% range) within 2 hours on $39.33K liquidity. 24h change of +41.76% on micro-cap with thin liquidity indicates extreme volatility. Any large sell order can cause catastrophic price drops.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $39.33K is critically shallow. The FDV/liquidity ratio of ~2.27x means the pool can be drained rapidly. High slippage expected on any trade above ~$500. 24h volume of ~$222K is 5.6x the liquidity pool size.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Critically shallow liquidity ($39.33K) creates extreme price impact and exit risk
Severe holder data anomaly (16 holders for 30 days → +933 in 1 hour) suggests data manipulation or unreliable indexing
No top holder data — ownership concentration is completely opaque
Overwhelming sell pressure: 69% of 24h volume is sells, net outflow of ~$84.5K
Unverified contract with unknown update authority
Micro-cap FDV of $89.5K with no utility, no description, and no verified fundamentals
Pump.fun origin with potential for rapid price collapse post-bonding curve graduation

Mitigating factors

Mutable: false metadata reduces risk of metadata-based rug
Token is listed as 'possible spam: false' by the data provider
Social links (Twitter, website) exist, suggesting some level of project presence
1,056 unique wallets active in 24h shows some breadth of participation
5-minute momentum is positive (+1.63%), suggesting very short-term buying interest

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced crypto traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap Pump.fun memecoins, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are using only a small speculative allocation. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone seeking capital preservation. This is NOT financial advice.

Granular is a micro-cap Pump.fun memecoin with a 24h price spike of +41.76% but severe structural weaknesses: $39.33K liquidity, 69% sell pressure, opaque ownership, and deeply anomalous holder data. The risk/reward profile is extremely unfavorable for most investors. Any thesis for investment is purely speculative and momentum-based, with no fundamental backing.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Momentum continuation: The 41.76% price spike attracts further speculative attention, new buyers pile in, liquidity deepens, and the token achieves a 5–10x from current levels (~$0.00045–$0.00090) before a correction.

Viral social media attention driving new buyer inflows
Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting micro-caps
Liquidity providers adding depth to reduce slippage
Genuine community formation around the Granular brand

Base Case

Gradual fade: The initial excitement subsides, sell pressure continues to dominate, price drifts down 30–50% from current levels over the next 1–2 weeks, settling in the $0.000045–$0.000065 range as speculative interest wanes.

Sell pressure remains dominant but not catastrophic
Liquidity stays roughly stable at current thin levels
No major new catalyst (positive or negative) emerges
Holder base stabilizes around current ~949 level

Bear Case

High probability

Distribution collapse: Insiders and early holders continue selling into the price spike, liquidity is drained, and price collapses back to near-launch levels (~$0.0000294 or lower), representing a ~67% decline from current price.

Continued 69% sell pressure exhausts buyer demand
Shallow $39.33K liquidity unable to absorb sell orders
No fundamental utility or narrative to sustain interest
Holder data anomalies reflect wash trading or coordinated pump-and-dump activity

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 18, 07:19 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-18 07:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Moralis on-chain token metadata API
PumpSwap DEX trading analytics (pair: 9dK4r1ocurbq8fsSzADpAyPtzW3LqjFvuTFe2ggSYP7a)
Hourly OHLC price data (2 candles)
On-chain holder metrics and historical holder series (30 days)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely limited and unreliable
No top holder data returned — whale map and concentration analysis are based on absence of data, not confirmed figures
Holder data contains a severe anomaly (16 holders for 30 days, +933 in 1 hour) that undermines all holder trend analysis
No sniper data available — smart money signals cannot be assessed
Update authority is 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed
Supply concentration reported as 0% for top 10 and top 100 — almost certainly a data indexing issue, not reality
Token is unverified with no contract audit — on-chain behavior cannot be fully validated
FDV and price data may be subject to manipulation given thin liquidity

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap memecoins, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data used contains significant anomalies and gaps that limit analytical confidence. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Granular a scam?

This contract has not been tested for honeypots or taxes yet. Checked Oct 16, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

How concentrated is Granular ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 949 addresses (2026-07-18 07:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Granular?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Granular liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-18 07:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $39,330.59. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Granular (Granular)?

Is Granular a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced crypto traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap Pump.fun memecoins, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are using only a small speculative allocation. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone seeking capital preservation. This is NOT financial advice.

What are the key risks of holding Granular?

Critically shallow liquidity ($39.33K) creates extreme price impact and exit risk • Severe holder data anomaly (16 holders for 30 days → +933 in 1 hour) suggests data manipulation or unreliable indexing • No top holder data — ownership concentration is completely opaque