Chinese Digital Oil Fund Price Today & AI Analysis

CDOFSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 14, 2026

$0.0₄7424

-0.33% 24h

Contract

Live

CDoFug7K6gYgiotXw1vcyfc9p4rdAxnbbj2DcH5AE4az

Chain

Solana

Holders

6,917

Market cap

$74,240

At a $1M market cap, $CDOF would be $0.001000 (13.5x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is CDOF a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 27

Watch insiders

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 78% of the supply.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

78%117 insiders still holding

Wallets linked to the creator hold a large share.
The liquidity could not be measured.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about CDOF

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

sultansultan$0.0₅6354+0.5%MC $6.4K

CUPSEYThe First Trencher$0.0₄1260-0.3%MC $12.6K

DEBTDEBT COIN$0.0₅5427-0.1%MC $5.4K

BLOCKBlockFall$0.0₅4096-0.9%MC $3.9K

KINETICKinetic$0.0₅3066-2.3%MC $2.9K

ZECZcash$1,296.79+6.1%MC $133.31M

Chinese Digital Oil Fund: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-14 23:19 UTC

Holder addresses

7,471

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$115,703.40

How concentrated is Chinese Digital Oil Fund ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 7,471 addresses (2026-06-14 23:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Chinese Digital Oil Fund?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Chinese Digital Oil Fund liquidity falling?: As of 2026-06-14 23:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $115,703.40. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-14 23:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 14, 11:19 PM UTC

FDV

$1,400,403

Liquidity

$115,703.40

Holders

7,471

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Chinese Digital Oil Fund (CDOF) is a Solana SPL token (mint: CDoFug7K6gYgiotXw1vcyfc9p4rdAxnbbj2DcH5AE4az) trading on Meteora Dynamic AMM v2. The token has experienced a catastrophic price collapse of ~89.55% in the past 24 hours, dropping from ~$0.01374 to ~$0.00140. Despite rapid holder growth over 30 days (from 423 to 7,471 holders, +94%), the price action signals a severe dump event. Liquidity is thin at $115.70K, sell pressure dominates at 65.7%, and the top 100 holders control 92.03% of supply — a highly concentrated distribution. No social links, no verified contract, and an unrecognized update authority raise significant red flags.

Key points

Catastrophic 89.55% price drop in 24 hours indicating a likely dump event
Extremely concentrated supply: top 100 holders control 92.03%
Rapid holder growth from 423 to 7,471 in ~30 days, suggesting coordinated onboarding
Very thin liquidity at $115.70K against $1.40M FDV
No social links, unverified contract, mutable metadata authority not renounced
Top 20 holders each hold ~1.01–1.28% with suspiciously uniform balances (~10M tokens each)

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24–72 hours

bearish

The token has already collapsed ~89.55% in 24 hours. The current price of ~$0.00140 is near the candle [1] close. With 65.7% sell pressure, dominant sell volume ($261.79K vs $136.52K buys), and a 5-minute change of -8.13%, further downside is highly probable in the short term. The thin liquidity pool ($115.70K) means even modest sell orders can cause outsized price impact.

Target low

$0.00050

Target high

$0.00200

Support: $0.00140 (current close, candle [1]), $0.00085 (candle [2] low)
Resistance: $0.00153 (candle [1] high), $0.01160 (candle [2] open / pre-crash level), $0.01387 (candle [2]–[3] highs, prior range top)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Unless significant new buying interest emerges, the token is likely to continue declining or remain depressed. The uniform top-holder distribution (~10M tokens each across 20 wallets) suggests coordinated actors who may continue distributing. Holder growth has been slowing (from +706/day on June 10 to +46/day on June 13), and the crash may accelerate holder exits.

Catalysts

Any coordinated whale sell-off from the 20 near-equal top holders
Continued absence of social presence or utility narrative
Liquidity pool depletion if LPs withdraw post-crash
Potential recovery if new speculative interest enters, though unlikely without catalysts

Bullish factors

Holder count grew +94% in 30 days, showing some community interest
24h buyer count (273) is close to seller count (254), suggesting not all participants are exiting
Buy transaction count (1,526) exceeds sell transaction count (1,033), indicating some accumulation activity

Bearish factors

Price collapsed ~89.55% in 24 hours — a classic dump signal
Sell volume ($261.79K) nearly doubles buy volume ($136.52K)
Top 100 holders control 92.03% of supply — extreme concentration risk
Liquidity is only $115.70K, making the token highly susceptible to further price impact
No social links, no verified contract, no utility described beyond vague 'Digital Oil' branding
Holder growth is decelerating sharply (from +706/day to +46/day in recent days)

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the speculative and opaque nature of this token, thin liquidity making price highly manipulable, no fundamental utility or verified project backing, and the post-crash price discovery phase being inherently unpredictable.

CDOF call history

Full track record →

Jun 14bearish@ $0.00140

24h-50.2%

7d-76.1%

30d-88.5%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: CDoFug...E4az
Total Supply: 999,999,185.44

Key Risks

Near-total price collapse (~89.55%) in 24 hours consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump
Extreme supply concentration: top 100 hold 92.03%, top 20 wallets have suspiciously uniform ~10M token balances
Critically thin liquidity ($115.70K) making further price crashes likely on any significant selling
No social links, no verified contract, no demonstrated utility or team transparency

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 24-hour OHLC series reveals a token that traded in a tight range of ~$0.01360–$0.01387 for candles [3]–[24] (approximately 22 hours), then experienced a catastrophic breakdown in candle [2] (22:00 UTC, June 14) where price crashed from an open of $0.01379 to a low of $0.000847 and closed at $0.001164 on massive volume of $211,822 — the highest volume candle by far. Candle [1] (23:00 UTC) shows a partial recovery attempt from $0.001160 open to a high of $0.001529 before closing at $0.001400, but remains 89%+ below the prior range. The pre-crash candles show extremely low volatility (tight bodies, minimal wicks), consistent with price being held artificially stable before a coordinated dump.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

The short-term and medium-term trends are both decisively bearish following the ~89.55% crash in candle [2]. The prior 22-hour sideways range (~$0.01360–$0.01387) has been completely invalidated. Price is now in a new, much lower range with no established support structure.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

34%

Sell

66%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00140 (current close, candle [1] close)

Major support

$0.000847 (candle [2] low — the crash wick bottom)

Immediate resistance

$0.001529 (candle [1] high)

Major resistance

$0.01160–$0.01387 (pre-crash trading range, candles [3]–[24])

The pre-crash range of $0.01360–$0.01387 now acts as massive overhead resistance. Immediate support is the current price level (~$0.00140); the crash wick low of ~$0.000847 is the next major support. A recovery to the pre-crash range would require ~10x from current levels and is highly unlikely without a fundamental catalyst.

Notable patterns

Artificial price stability (22 hours of tight range ~$0.01360–$0.01387) followed by a coordinated dump — classic 'pump and dump' pattern
Bearish engulfing / crash candle [2]: massive red candle engulfing all prior price action with 10x normal volume
Dead-cat bounce attempt in candle [1]: partial recovery from crash low but closing well below pre-crash levels
Elevated volume in candle [23] (~$61,106) may indicate early distribution before the main dump
Pre-crash candles show doji-like characteristics with minimal body movement, suggesting price manipulation or thin order book

Liquidity

$115,703.40

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically thin at $115.70K on a single Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pool (pair: 2j8vA5LuscSdjQ8gt4HUz2cUkttBRFpdswhvoUqFRh5V). The FDV of $1.40M against $115.70K liquidity gives a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of only ~8.3%, meaning the market is highly susceptible to price manipulation and slippage. The 24h sell volume ($261.79K) is nearly double the buy volume ($136.52K), confirming strong net outflow. Despite more buy transactions (1,526) than sell transactions (1,033), the higher average sell size indicates larger holders are exiting while smaller retail buyers are accumulating in small amounts. The 5-minute price change of -8.13% on what is presumably low volume confirms extreme slippage risk. Any significant sell order will move the price dramatically.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,185.44

FDV

$1,400,402.94

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
The token lost ~89.55% of its value in a single 24-hour period. The 5-minute change of -8.13% at current levels confirms extreme ongoing volatility. Pre-crash price was ~$0.01374; current price is ~$0.00140.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $115.70K on a single DEX pool. The liquidity-to-FDV ratio is ~8.3%. Large orders will cause severe slippage, and LP withdrawal could effectively destroy the market.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Near-total price collapse (~89.55%) in 24 hours consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump
Extreme supply concentration: top 100 hold 92.03%, top 20 wallets have suspiciously uniform ~10M token balances
Critically thin liquidity ($115.70K) making further price crashes likely on any significant selling
No social links, no verified contract, no demonstrated utility or team transparency
Holder growth decelerating and reversing (-108 in last hour) post-crash
Update authority not renounced; mint/freeze authority status unknown
Single DEX pool dependency — LP withdrawal would eliminate all liquidity

Mitigating factors

Token marked as 'Mutable: false', providing some metadata protection
7,471 total holders provides some distribution breadth
Buy transaction count (1,526) exceeds sell count (1,033), suggesting some retail accumulation interest
Not flagged as spam by the data provider

Suitable for

This token is NOT suitable for most investors. Only highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand the risks of micro-cap, post-crash Solana tokens should consider any position, and only with capital they can afford to lose entirely. The evidence strongly suggests a pump-and-dump scheme.

CDOF presents an extremely high-risk profile consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump scheme. The token experienced artificial price stability for ~22 hours before a single catastrophic dump candle erased ~89.55% of value. The uniform top-holder distribution, thin liquidity, absent social presence, and decelerating holder growth all point to a token designed to extract value from retail participants rather than deliver genuine utility. Any investment thesis must be grounded in speculation only.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Speculative recovery: If the crash was caused by a single large seller and remaining holders hold firm, the token could stabilize and attract new speculative buyers drawn by the low price (~$0.00140) and the 'Digital Oil' narrative. A recovery to 20–30% of pre-crash levels (~$0.0027–$0.0041) is theoretically possible.

New speculative buying interest attracted by the low post-crash price
Coordinated community effort to rebuild liquidity and holder confidence
Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting all tokens
Remaining top holders choosing to hold rather than continue distributing

Base Case

Prolonged low-price stagnation: The token stabilizes at a fraction of its pre-crash price ($0.00100–$0.00200) with minimal trading activity, thin liquidity, and slow holder attrition. The project neither recovers meaningfully nor goes to zero immediately, but gradually fades into irrelevance.

Some retail holders continue to hold hoping for recovery
Liquidity pool remains intact at reduced levels
No new major sell events from top holders in the near term
No new marketing or utility development to attract buyers

Bear Case

High probability

Continued collapse: The remaining concentrated holders (top 100 control 92.03%) continue distributing into any price recovery, liquidity providers withdraw their capital, and the token approaches zero. This is the most likely outcome given the evidence.

Continued selling by the 20 near-identical top wallets (likely coordinated insiders)
LP withdrawal from the single Meteora pool eliminating all liquidity
Accelerating holder exits post-crash (-108 in last hour)
No utility, no social presence, no team transparency to rebuild confidence

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 14, 11:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-14 23:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, authority, supply, decimals)
Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pool data (pair: 2j8vA5LuscSdjQ8gt4HUz2cUkttBRFpdswhvoUqFRh5V)
24-hour OHLC candle data (hourly, USD)
Trading analytics (volume, buyer/seller counts, price changes)
Holder metrics and distribution data
Historical holder time series (30 days daily)
Top 20 holder addresses and balances
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Sniper/early buyer data is unavailable — smart money signals are inferred from holder distribution patterns only
Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from provided metadata fields
Wallet classifications (insider vs. independent) are inferred from balance uniformity patterns, not confirmed on-chain identity
No social or off-chain data available to assess team legitimacy or project roadmap
Single liquidity pool data only — no cross-DEX aggregation available
Historical OHLC data limited to 24 hourly candles — longer-term technical analysis is not possible
The 'Mutable: false' flag interpretation may vary depending on on-chain program state

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens on Solana, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The evidence presented strongly suggests manipulative trading patterns. Always conduct your own due diligence before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Chinese Digital Oil Fund (CDOF) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 78% of the supply. Wallets linked to the creator hold a large share. The liquidity could not be measured. Checked Oct 27, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Chinese Digital Oil Fund (CDOF)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 27, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Chinese Digital Oil Fund ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 7,471 addresses (2026-06-14 23:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Chinese Digital Oil Fund?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Chinese Digital Oil Fund liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-14 23:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $115,703.40. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Chinese Digital Oil Fund (CDOF)?

Is CDOF a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is NOT suitable for most investors. Only highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand the risks of micro-cap, post-crash Solana tokens should consider any position, and only with capital they can afford to lose entirely. The evidence strongly suggests a pump-and-dump scheme.

What are the key risks of holding CDOF?

Near-total price collapse (~89.55%) in 24 hours consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump • Extreme supply concentration: top 100 hold 92.03%, top 20 wallets have suspiciously uniform ~10M token balances • Critically thin liquidity ($115.70K) making further price crashes likely on any significant selling