CDOF

Chinese Digital Oil Fund Price Today & AI Analysis

CDOF
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 14, 2026

CDoFug7K6gYgiotXw1vcyfc9p4rdAxnbbj2DcH5AE4az

$0.047507

-0.01%

FDV $75,065

LiveContract:CDoFug7K6gYgiotXw1vcyfc9p4rdAxnbbj2DcH5AE4azChain:SolanaHolders:7,067Market cap:$75,065

More tokens on Solana

CASHBLEP

CASHBLEP

Cash Blep

$0.0524750.0%
MC $2.5K
SHROOMIE

SHROOMIE

SHROOMIE

$0.0516030.0%
MC $1.6K
USAPL

USAPL

unapple coin

$0.0531523.4%
MC $3.2K
LEVY

LEVY

Levy on Sol

$0.0521270.0%
MC $2.1K
WormTower

WormTower

The Worm Tower

$0.0516600.0%
MC $1.5K
STONK

STONK

STONK

$0.303648.5%
MC $258.92M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about CDOF

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jun 14, 11:19 PM
FDV

$1,400,403

Liquidity

$115,703

Holders

7,471

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Chinese Digital Oil Fund (CDOF) is a Solana SPL token (mint: CDoFug7K6gYgiotXw1vcyfc9p4rdAxnbbj2DcH5AE4az) trading on Meteora Dynamic AMM v2. The token has experienced a catastrophic price collapse of ~89.55% in the past 24 hours, dropping from ~$0.01374 to ~$0.00140. Despite rapid holder growth over 30 days (from 423 to 7,471 holders, +94%), the price action signals a severe dump event. Liquidity is thin at $115.70K, sell pressure dominates at 65.7%, and the top 100 holders control 92.03% of supply — a highly concentrated distribution. No social links, no verified contract, and an unrecognized update authority raise significant red flags.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Catastrophic 89.55% price drop in 24 hours indicating a likely dump event
Extremely concentrated supply: top 100 holders control 92.03%
Rapid holder growth from 423 to 7,471 in ~30 days, suggesting coordinated onboarding
Very thin liquidity at $115.70K against $1.40M FDV
No social links, unverified contract, mutable metadata authority not renounced
Top 20 holders each hold ~1.01–1.28% with suspiciously uniform balances (~10M tokens each)

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
24–72 hours

The token has already collapsed ~89.55% in 24 hours. The current price of ~$0.00140 is near the candle [1] close. With 65.7% sell pressure, dominant sell volume ($261.79K vs $136.52K buys), and a 5-minute change of -8.13%, further downside is highly probable in the short term. The thin liquidity pool ($115.70K) means even modest sell orders can cause outsized price impact.

Target low$0.00050
Target high$0.00200
Support: $0.00140 (current close, candle [1]), $0.00085 (candle [2] low)
Resistance: $0.00153 (candle [1] high), $0.01160 (candle [2] open / pre-crash level), $0.01387 (candle [2]–[3] highs, prior range top)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Unless significant new buying interest emerges, the token is likely to continue declining or remain depressed. The uniform top-holder distribution (~10M tokens each across 20 wallets) suggests coordinated actors who may continue distributing. Holder growth has been slowing (from +706/day on June 10 to +46/day on June 13), and the crash may accelerate holder exits.

Catalysts
  • Any coordinated whale sell-off from the 20 near-equal top holders
  • Continued absence of social presence or utility narrative
  • Liquidity pool depletion if LPs withdraw post-crash
  • Potential recovery if new speculative interest enters, though unlikely without catalysts

Bullish factors

  • Holder count grew +94% in 30 days, showing some community interest
  • 24h buyer count (273) is close to seller count (254), suggesting not all participants are exiting
  • Buy transaction count (1,526) exceeds sell transaction count (1,033), indicating some accumulation activity

Bearish factors

  • Price collapsed ~89.55% in 24 hours — a classic dump signal
  • Sell volume ($261.79K) nearly doubles buy volume ($136.52K)
  • Top 100 holders control 92.03% of supply — extreme concentration risk
  • Liquidity is only $115.70K, making the token highly susceptible to further price impact
  • No social links, no verified contract, no utility described beyond vague 'Digital Oil' branding
  • Holder growth is decelerating sharply (from +706/day to +46/day in recent days)
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the speculative and opaque nature of this token, thin liquidity making price highly manipulable, no fundamental utility or verified project backing, and the post-crash price discovery phase being inherently unpredictable.

CDOF call history

Full track record →
Jun 14bearish
24h-50.2%
7d-76.1%
30d-88.5%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

The 24-hour OHLC series reveals a token that traded in a tight range of ~$0.01360–$0.01387 for candles [3]–[24] (approximately 22 hours), then experienced a catastrophic breakdown in candle [2] (22:00 UTC, June 14) where price crashed from an open of $0.01379 to a low of $0.000847 and closed at $0.001164 on massive volume of $211,822 — the highest volume candle by far. Candle [1] (23:00 UTC) shows a partial recovery attempt from $0.001160 open to a high of $0.001529 before closing at $0.001400, but remains 89%+ below the prior range. The pre-crash candles show extremely low volatility (tight bodies, minimal wicks), consistent with price being held artificially stable before a coordinated dump.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 34%Sell 66%

The short-term and medium-term trends are both decisively bearish following the ~89.55% crash in candle [2]. The prior 22-hour sideways range (~$0.01360–$0.01387) has been completely invalidated. Price is now in a new, much lower range with no established support structure.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.00140 (current close, candle [1] close)
Major$0.000847 (candle [2] low — the crash wick bottom)
Resistance
Immediate$0.001529 (candle [1] high)
Major$0.01160–$0.01387 (pre-crash trading range, candles [3]–[24])

The pre-crash range of $0.01360–$0.01387 now acts as massive overhead resistance. Immediate support is the current price level (~$0.00140); the crash wick low of ~$0.000847 is the next major support. A recovery to the pre-crash range would require ~10x from current levels and is highly unlikely without a fundamental catalyst.

Notable patterns

  • Artificial price stability (22 hours of tight range ~$0.01360–$0.01387) followed by a coordinated dump — classic 'pump and dump' pattern
  • Bearish engulfing / crash candle [2]: massive red candle engulfing all prior price action with 10x normal volume
  • Dead-cat bounce attempt in candle [1]: partial recovery from crash low but closing well below pre-crash levels
  • Elevated volume in candle [23] (~$61,106) may indicate early distribution before the main dump
  • Pre-crash candles show doji-like characteristics with minimal body movement, suggesting price manipulation or thin order book

Total holders7,471
24h Δ+2.1
7d Δ+36
30d Δ+94
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

Holder growth and price are now inversely correlated: holders grew rapidly (+94% in 30 days) while price has collapsed ~89.55% in the last 24 hours. The rapid holder accumulation phase (May 26–June 10) coincided with the token's stable price range, but the crash has now decoupled growth from price performance. Recent holder growth is decelerating sharply: from +706/day (June 10) to +512 (June 11), +298 (June 12), +46 (June 13), and -108 in the last hour — signaling the growth phase is ending and exits are beginning.

Holder growth was flat at 423 from May 15–25, then exploded starting May 26 (+109 in one day, +43% single-day growth). This sudden activation after a dormant period is suspicious and may indicate a coordinated marketing push or airdrop-like distribution. Growth peaked around June 10 (+706 holders/day, +11%) and has been decelerating since. The 30-day growth of +94% (from 423 to 7,471) is impressive in absolute terms but the quality of holders is questionable given the uniform top-holder balances and post-crash exit behavior. The -108 holder change in the last hour is a warning sign of accelerating exits.

Top 10 hold10.77%
Top 100 hold92.03%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

3EodmRjkf4Msoeh1Nu76MdFUSWseKhkHnMaNWJ6p7m1k

individual whale / possible insider

1.28%

HLnpSz9h2S4hiLQ43rnSD9XkcUThA7B8hQMKmDaiTLcC

individual whale / possible insider

1.24%

2vpNeTHaWG1JnQkdizRqYZEvWzw1b2nySLr6X6cRz3AJ

individual whale / possible insider

1.04%

SLQFXgBdgwFTjZhk135cRrooHn3NPViA66hGinK4mQh

individual whale / possible insider

1.03%

7ZWgzhQoyMEsswiXGUJvYjUL1zKAoSzRfbTjxbjdUvG2

individual whale / possible insider

1.03%

The top 100 holders control 92.03% of supply — an extreme concentration level. More concerning is the uniformity of the top 20 holders: addresses [3]–[20] each hold approximately 10.1M–10.4M tokens (~1.01–1.04%), while [1] and [2] hold slightly more (12.8M and 12.4M). This near-identical distribution across 18+ wallets is highly unusual and strongly suggests these are controlled by the same entity or a coordinated group. The crash pattern (stable price → massive dump) is consistent with these wallets having distributed into retail buyers. The overall whale sentiment is 'distributing' based on the price action and volume data.

Liquidity$115,700
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$136,520
Sell$261,790
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers273
Unique sellers254

Liquidity is critically thin at $115.70K on a single Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pool (pair: 2j8vA5LuscSdjQ8gt4HUz2cUkttBRFpdswhvoUqFRh5V). The FDV of $1.40M against $115.70K liquidity gives a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of only ~8.3%, meaning the market is highly susceptible to price manipulation and slippage. The 24h sell volume ($261.79K) is nearly double the buy volume ($136.52K), confirming strong net outflow. Despite more buy transactions (1,526) than sell transactions (1,033), the higher average sell size indicates larger holders are exiting while smaller retail buyers are accumulating in small amounts. The 5-minute price change of -8.13% on what is presumably low volume confirms extreme slippage risk. Any significant sell order will move the price dramatically.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,999,185.44
FDV$1,400,402.94

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is approximately 1 billion tokens (999,999,185.44). The update authority is 4zqUdpDVTmTHVVt2AFHsueYmtjg42xMRW5dSY3D9ApkN — this is NOT a burn address (not 11111... or a known renounced address), meaning the metadata can potentially be updated. The token is marked as 'Mutable: false' which provides some protection against metadata changes, but the mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the provided data alone — classified as 'unknown'. The contract is unverified and the token has no social links, adding to the opacity. The FDV of $1.40M against $115.70K liquidity and a post-crash price of $0.00140 suggests the market cap is largely theoretical given the thin trading environment.

Volatility
high

The token lost ~89.55% of its value in a single 24-hour period. The 5-minute change of -8.13% at current levels confirms extreme ongoing volatility. Pre-crash price was ~$0.01374; current price is ~$0.00140.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $115.70K on a single DEX pool. The liquidity-to-FDV ratio is ~8.3%. Large orders will cause severe slippage, and LP withdrawal could effectively destroy the market.

Concentration
high

Top 100 holders control 92.03% of supply. The top 20 holders each hold suspiciously uniform amounts (~10.1M–12.8M tokens), strongly suggesting coordinated wallet control by insiders.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available. However, the uniform top-holder distribution and crash pattern are consistent with coordinated insider dumping. The risk is assessed as medium rather than high only due to data unavailability.

Authority
medium

Update authority (4zqUdpDVTmTHVVt2AFHsueYmtjg42xMRW5dSY3D9ApkN) is not renounced. Mint and freeze authority status is unknown. The token is marked 'Mutable: false' which partially mitigates metadata risk, but full authority renunciation cannot be confirmed.

Key risks

  • Near-total price collapse (~89.55%) in 24 hours consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump
  • Extreme supply concentration: top 100 hold 92.03%, top 20 wallets have suspiciously uniform ~10M token balances
  • Critically thin liquidity ($115.70K) making further price crashes likely on any significant selling
  • No social links, no verified contract, no demonstrated utility or team transparency
  • Holder growth decelerating and reversing (-108 in last hour) post-crash
  • Update authority not renounced; mint/freeze authority status unknown
  • Single DEX pool dependency — LP withdrawal would eliminate all liquidity

Mitigating factors

  • Token marked as 'Mutable: false', providing some metadata protection
  • 7,471 total holders provides some distribution breadth
  • Buy transaction count (1,526) exceeds sell count (1,033), suggesting some retail accumulation interest
  • Not flagged as spam by the data provider
Suitable for: This token is NOT suitable for most investors. Only highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand the risks of micro-cap, post-crash Solana tokens should consider any position, and only with capital they can afford to lose entirely. The evidence strongly suggests a pump-and-dump scheme.

CDOF presents an extremely high-risk profile consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump scheme. The token experienced artificial price stability for ~22 hours before a single catastrophic dump candle erased ~89.55% of value. The uniform top-holder distribution, thin liquidity, absent social presence, and decelerating holder growth all point to a token designed to extract value from retail participants rather than deliver genuine utility. Any investment thesis must be grounded in speculation only.

Bull case (low)

Speculative recovery: If the crash was caused by a single large seller and remaining holders hold firm, the token could stabilize and attract new speculative buyers drawn by the low price (~$0.00140) and the 'Digital Oil' narrative. A recovery to 20–30% of pre-crash levels (~$0.0027–$0.0041) is theoretically possible.

  • New speculative buying interest attracted by the low post-crash price
  • Coordinated community effort to rebuild liquidity and holder confidence
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting all tokens
  • Remaining top holders choosing to hold rather than continue distributing

Base case

Prolonged low-price stagnation: The token stabilizes at a fraction of its pre-crash price ($0.00100–$0.00200) with minimal trading activity, thin liquidity, and slow holder attrition. The project neither recovers meaningfully nor goes to zero immediately, but gradually fades into irrelevance.

  • Some retail holders continue to hold hoping for recovery
  • Liquidity pool remains intact at reduced levels
  • No new major sell events from top holders in the near term
  • No new marketing or utility development to attract buyers

Bear case (high)

Continued collapse: The remaining concentrated holders (top 100 control 92.03%) continue distributing into any price recovery, liquidity providers withdraw their capital, and the token approaches zero. This is the most likely outcome given the evidence.

  • Continued selling by the 20 near-identical top wallets (likely coordinated insiders)
  • LP withdrawal from the single Meteora pool eliminating all liquidity
  • Accelerating holder exits post-crash (-108 in last hour)
  • No utility, no social presence, no team transparency to rebuild confidence

GeneratedJun 14, 11:19 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-06-14T23:00:00Z. Price and holder data may have changed since snapshot.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, authority, supply, decimals)
  • Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pool data (pair: 2j8vA5LuscSdjQ8gt4HUz2cUkttBRFpdswhvoUqFRh5V)
  • 24-hour OHLC candle data (hourly, USD)
  • Trading analytics (volume, buyer/seller counts, price changes)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Historical holder time series (30 days daily)
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Sniper/early buyer data is unavailable — smart money signals are inferred from holder distribution patterns only
  • Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from provided metadata fields
  • Wallet classifications (insider vs. independent) are inferred from balance uniformity patterns, not confirmed on-chain identity
  • No social or off-chain data available to assess team legitimacy or project roadmap
  • Single liquidity pool data only — no cross-DEX aggregation available
  • Historical OHLC data limited to 24 hourly candles — longer-term technical analysis is not possible
  • The 'Mutable: false' flag interpretation may vary depending on on-chain program state

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens on Solana, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The evidence presented strongly suggests manipulative trading patterns. Always conduct your own due diligence before making any investment decision.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,999,185.44

Key Risks

•Near-total price collapse (~89.55%) in 24 hours consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump
•Extreme supply concentration: top 100 hold 92.03%, top 20 wallets have suspiciously uniform ~10M token balances
•Critically thin liquidity ($115.70K) making further price crashes likely on any significant selling
•No social links, no verified contract, no demonstrated utility or team transparency

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for CDOF. However, the on-chain holder distribution raises significant concerns: the top 20 holders each hold remarkably uniform balances of approximately 10.1M–12.8M tokens (1.01%–1.28% each), which is highly atypical and suggests coordinated wallet creation or a structured distribution scheme. The crash pattern — 22 hours of artificial price stability followed by a single massive dump candle — is consistent with coordinated insider selling. The 65.7% sell pressure and $261.79K sell volume vs $136.52K buy volume confirm net distribution.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — the sniper analysis endpoint returned no data for this token.

Likely negative — the uniform top-holder wallet structure and the timing of the crash suggest early/coordinated buyers have been distributing. The 24h holder count dropped by 108 in the last hour, indicating exits are accelerating post-crash.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Chinese Digital Oil Fund (CDOF)?

The token has already collapsed ~89.55% in 24 hours. The current price of ~$0.00140 is near the candle [1] close. With 65.7% sell pressure, dominant sell volume ($261.79K vs $136.52K buys), and a 5-minute change of -8.13%, further downside is highly probable in the short term. The thin liquidity pool ($115.70K) means even modest sell orders can cause outsized price impact. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.00050 to $0.00200.

Is CDOF a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is NOT suitable for most investors. Only highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand the risks of micro-cap, post-crash Solana tokens should consider any position, and only with capital they can afford to lose entirely. The evidence strongly suggests a pump-and-dump scheme.

How are CDOF holders trending?

Chinese Digital Oil Fund currently has 7,471 holders and is growing (24h: 2.1, 7d: 36, 30d: 94). Holder growth was flat at 423 from May 15–25, then exploded starting May 26 (+109 in one day, +43% single-day growth). This sudden activation after a dormant period is suspicious and may indicate a coordinated marketing push or airdrop-like distribution. Growth peaked around June 10 (+706 holders/day, +11%) and has been decelerating since. The 30-day growth of +94% (from 423 to 7,471) is impressive in absolute terms but the quality of holders is questionable given the uniform top-holder balances and post-crash exit behavior. The -108 holder change in the last hour is a warning sign of accelerating exits.

What does sniper activity look like for CDOF?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding CDOF?

Near-total price collapse (~89.55%) in 24 hours consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump • Extreme supply concentration: top 100 hold 92.03%, top 20 wallets have suspiciously uniform ~10M token balances • Critically thin liquidity ($115.70K) making further price crashes likely on any significant selling

← Back to all predictions

Track CDOF