TCG

Pokémon Price Today & AI Analysis

TCGSolanaAnalysis as of May 3, 2026

Price

$0.052465

Contract

Live
CBLpK9s2RzRdpD4M1xrsm8nWQQqCo59kDRVyFtQmpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

165

Market cap

$2,463

More tokens on Solana

GringottGringottGringott$0.053843-0.2%MC $3.7KCAMCAMCAMERAMEME$0.052639+0.0%MC $2.6KOmnimalsOmnimalsOmnimals$0.055150-0.5%MC $4.3KFav glowFav glowOKX Wallet makes my skin glow$0.052326+8.5%MC $2.3K67BC67BC67 Bull Coin$0.052262+0.0%MC $2.3KRAYRAYRaydium$2.1+5.4%MC $1.16B

Pokémon: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-03 07:47 UTC

Holder addresses

312

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$8,989.31
How concentrated is Pokémon ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 312 addresses (2026-05-03 07:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Pokémon?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Pokémon liquidity falling?
As of 2026-05-03 07:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $8,989.31. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-03 07:47 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about TCG

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of May 3, 07:47 AM UTC

FDV

$13,584

Liquidity

$8,989.31

Holders

312

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Pokémon (TCG) is a meme/brand-name token on Solana launched via PumpSwap with mint address CBLpK9s2RzRdpD4M1xrsm8nWQQqCo59kDRVyFtQmpump. With a fully diluted valuation of only ~$13.6K and total liquidity of ~$8.99K, this is an extremely micro-cap token. The token has experienced a severe 56.4% price decline in the past 24 hours, with 72% sell pressure dominating trading activity. Holder count surged from 41 to 368 on May 1st before dropping back to 312, suggesting a pump-and-dump dynamic. The update authority has NOT been renounced (held by TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM), and the contract is unverified. The top holder (the PumpSwap liquidity pool) controls 33.56% of supply, and the top 10 wallets collectively hold 60.02%.

Key points

  • Extremely low FDV (~$13.6K) and liquidity (~$8.99K) — ultra micro-cap with high manipulation risk
  • Severe 24h price decline of -56.4% with 72% sell pressure indicating active distribution
  • Holder base exploded from 41 to 368 in a single day (May 1) then dropped to 312 — classic pump-and-dump pattern
  • Top 10 holders control 60.02% of supply; top 100 control 97.97% — extreme concentration
  • Update authority not renounced; contract unverified — elevated rug risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

Price is in a clear downtrend from a high of ~$0.0000317 (candle 24) to the current ~$0.0000136, a decline of ~57% over 24 hours. Sell pressure at 72% and 420 sells vs 281 buys confirm continued distribution. A minor 5m bounce of +3.6% and 1h bounce of +1.6% may represent a dead-cat bounce. The path of least resistance remains downward given the overwhelming sell pressure and declining holder count.

Target low

$0.0000100

Target high

$0.0000175

Support

$0.0000136 (current price / recent low), $0.0000127 (candle 4 low), $0.0000100 (psychological round number)

Resistance

$0.0000175 (candle 6 close), $0.0000225 (candle 7 close / candle 13 close area), $0.0000251 (candle 8 high — 24h peak)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

The token was dormant with only 41 holders for the entire month of April before a sudden spike on May 1. This pattern is consistent with a coordinated pump. With 97.97% of supply held by the top 100 wallets, ongoing distribution by early holders is likely. Unless a significant catalyst emerges (e.g., viral social media traction, exchange listing), the token is likely to continue declining toward negligible value.

Catalysts

  • Viral social media campaign leveraging the Pokémon brand name
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all micro-caps
  • New exchange or DEX listing increasing liquidity and visibility
  • Coordinated community buyback effort

Bullish factors

  • Minor short-term bounce signals (+3.6% in 5m, +1.6% in 1h) suggest possible temporary relief rally
  • Pokémon brand name has broad cultural recognition that could attract speculative interest
  • Some snipers remain in profit (39.3%, 37.5%, 17.4% realized PnL), suggesting not all early money has exited
  • Token is mutable=false, reducing some manipulation vectors

Bearish factors

  • Price down -56.4% in 24 hours with 72% sell pressure (420 sells vs 281 buys)
  • Holder count dropped -54 (-17%) in 24 hours — active exit
  • Top 10 holders control 60.02%; top 100 control 97.97% — extreme concentration risk
  • Total liquidity only $8.99K — any meaningful sell order will cause severe slippage
  • Update authority not renounced — potential rug vector
  • Token was dormant for entire April (41 holders, zero change) before sudden pump — highly suspicious
  • Multiple snipers showing large realized losses (-70.8%, -69.2%, -53.3%) suggesting they are still holding and may dump

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extremely small market cap and liquidity, making price highly susceptible to single-wallet manipulation. Sniper data is largely incomplete (amounts unknown), and the token's history is only ~2 days old with meaningful trading activity. The meme coin space is inherently unpredictable.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
CBLpK9...pump
Total Supply
999,666,525.75

Key Risks

  • Extreme price decline (-56.4% in 24h) with no clear bottom established
  • Total liquidity of only $8.99K — catastrophic slippage risk for any meaningful position
  • Top 10 holders control 60.02% of supply — extreme dump risk
  • Token was dormant for 27 days before a sudden pump — highly suspicious launch pattern

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 24-hour OHLC series (candles 24→1, oldest to newest) shows a clear bearish trend. The token opened around $0.0000317 (candle 24) and has declined to $0.0000136 (candle 1), a ~57% drop. The highest point was candle 24's open/high at $0.0000317. Candle 8 (00:00 UTC May 3) printed a high of $0.0000251, representing a lower high after the initial peak — confirming a downtrend of lower highs and lower lows. Candles 5–7 show a sharp sell-off from $0.0000226 to $0.0000130 with high volume (955–1827 USD/hr). The most recent candles (1–2) show very low volume (205–249 USD) and tight ranges, suggesting price exhaustion but no clear reversal signal.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Both short-term and medium-term trends are firmly bearish. The token has printed a series of lower highs and lower lows over the past 24 hours, declining from $0.0000317 to $0.0000136. No bullish reversal pattern has been confirmed. The slight uptick in the last 5m/1h is insufficient to call a trend change.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

28%

Sell

72%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000136 (current price, recent candle low)

Major support

$0.0000127 (candle 4 intraday low — $0.000012707)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000175 (candle 6 close — $0.000014949, candle 7 close area)

Major resistance

$0.0000251 (candle 8 high — $0.0000251178, 24h peak)

The $0.0000136 level is the current price and recent low, acting as immediate support. A break below $0.0000127 (candle 4 low) would signal further downside with little structural support. On the upside, $0.0000175 is the first meaningful resistance from the candle 6–7 close zone. The $0.0000251 level (candle 8 high) represents the 24h peak and major resistance that would require a significant catalyst to reclaim.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish cascade: series of lower highs and lower lows across all 24 candles
  • High-volume distribution candles at 14:00–20:00 UTC May 2 (candles 12, 14, 18 each >2,000 USD volume) followed by price collapse
  • Dead-cat bounce candidate: candles 8–9 showed a brief recovery to $0.0000251 before resuming downtrend
  • Volume exhaustion: last 2 candles show dramatically reduced volume (205–249 USD) suggesting selling pressure is tapering
  • Bearish engulfing pattern visible in candle 7→8 sequence where price briefly recovered then was overwhelmed by sellers in candle 7 (open $0.0000226, close $0.0000175 on 1,827 USD volume)

Liquidity

Liquidity

$8,989.31

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $8.99K is dangerously shallow — any trade above a few hundred dollars will cause significant slippage. The 24h sell volume ($15.99K) is 2.57x the buy volume ($6.23K), confirming strong net outflow. Unique sellers (212) outnumber unique buyers (103) by more than 2:1. The FDV of $13.22K is barely above the liquidity pool value of $8.99K, meaning the liquidity pool represents ~68% of the entire market cap — a sign of an extremely illiquid and fragile market. The pair trades on PumpSwap (69jiwmRZWa3Msg5TSPM3goD9vTSv7rrV3oE8oXjbbrQe), which is a permissionless AMM. Any large holder exiting would drain the pool significantly and cause catastrophic price impact.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,666,525.75

FDV

$13,584.16

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price declined -56.4% in 24 hours from a high of ~$0.0000317 to ~$0.0000136. The token has demonstrated extreme intraday volatility with swings of 50%+ within single hours (e.g., candle 17: low $0.0000156, high $0.0000249). This level of volatility is consistent with micro-cap meme tokens subject to pump-and-dump dynamics.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $8.99K on a single PumpSwap pool. The FDV ($13.22K) barely exceeds the liquidity pool value, meaning the market is extremely thin. Any sell order above ~$500 would cause severe slippage. Exit liquidity for larger holders is essentially non-existent.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extreme price decline (-56.4% in 24h) with no clear bottom established
  • Total liquidity of only $8.99K — catastrophic slippage risk for any meaningful position
  • Top 10 holders control 60.02% of supply — extreme dump risk
  • Token was dormant for 27 days before a sudden pump — highly suspicious launch pattern
  • Update authority not renounced — metadata manipulation possible
  • Unverified contract with unauthorized use of Pokémon IP — legal/delisting risk
  • Multiple snipers still holding at significant losses — potential future dump pressure
  • Holder count declining rapidly (-17% in 24h) — active exit by participants

Mitigating factors

  • Token marked as mutable=false, reducing some metadata manipulation risk
  • PumpFun launch mechanism typically burns mint authority upon graduation
  • Some snipers have already exited profitably, reducing future sniper dump pressure
  • The Pokémon brand has broad cultural recognition that could attract new speculative buyers
  • Minor short-term price stabilization signals (5m +3.6%, 1h +1.6%) suggest temporary selling exhaustion

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap meme token dynamics on Solana. Position sizes should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket only).

TCG (Pokémon) is an ultra-micro-cap meme token on Solana that appears to have undergone a classic pump-and-dump cycle. The token sat dormant for 27 days with 41 holders before exploding to 368 holders on May 1, followed by a -56.4% price collapse within 24 hours. With $8.99K in liquidity, 60% supply concentration in the top 10 wallets, and overwhelming sell pressure (72%), the risk/reward profile is extremely unfavorable. The only speculative case rests on the Pokémon brand name attracting new buyers, but this is offset by severe structural weaknesses.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A viral social media campaign or broader Solana meme coin rally attracts new buyers to the Pokémon brand name, causing a short-term price recovery of 2–5x from current levels. Early snipers who are still in profit provide a floor by holding, and new retail FOMO drives volume.

  • Viral Pokémon/TCG cultural moment driving speculative interest
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting micro-caps
  • Coordinated community buyback or influencer promotion
  • Oversold conditions attracting contrarian buyers

Base Case

The token stabilizes at current depressed levels (~$0.0000100–$0.0000136) with minimal trading activity, gradually losing remaining holders as interest fades. The token becomes effectively illiquid and dormant, similar to its April state, but at a much lower price.

  • Selling pressure gradually exhausts as most motivated sellers have already exited
  • No new significant catalyst emerges to drive fresh buying interest
  • Remaining holders are long-term bagholders unwilling to sell at current losses
  • Liquidity pool remains intact but thin, preventing complete price discovery collapse

Bear Case

High probability

Continued distribution by top holders and remaining snipers drains the $8.99K liquidity pool, causing price to collapse toward zero. The unauthorized Pokémon IP usage leads to platform delistings. Holder count continues declining as participants exit.

  • Top 10 holders (60.02% of supply) continuing to distribute
  • Remaining loss-making snipers dumping on any price recovery
  • Liquidity pool drainage making exit impossible for remaining holders
  • Platform action against unauthorized Pokémon IP usage
  • No fundamental utility or development activity evident

Analysis details

Generated

May 3, 07:47 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-03 07:47 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, authority, supply, decimals)
  • PumpSwap DEX OHLC candle data (24 hourly candles)
  • Trading analytics (volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Historical holder time series (30 days daily)
  • Top 20 holder wallet data with balances and percentages
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)
  • Price feed (USD and SOL-denominated)

Limitations

  • Sniper USD amounts sniped are unknown — sniper concentration percentage is estimated and imprecise
  • Mint authority and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — classified as unknown
  • Token is only ~2 days old with meaningful trading activity, limiting historical pattern analysis
  • No order book data available — slippage estimates are approximations based on liquidity pool size
  • Social sentiment data not available beyond the presence of Twitter/website links
  • The update authority wallet (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM) has not been analyzed for historical behavior
  • Holder acquisition breakdown (swap=298, transfer=14) does not identify specific whale wallet origins

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The analyst has no position in TCG. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Pokémon ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 312 addresses (2026-05-03 07:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Pokémon?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Pokémon liquidity falling?

As of 2026-05-03 07:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $8,989.31. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Pokémon (TCG)?

Price is in a clear downtrend from a high of ~$0.0000317 (candle 24) to the current ~$0.0000136, a decline of ~57% over 24 hours. Sell pressure at 72% and 420 sells vs 281 buys confirm continued distribution. A minor 5m bounce of +3.6% and 1h bounce of +1.6% may represent a dead-cat bounce. The path of least resistance remains downward given the overwhelming sell pressure and declining holder count. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000100 to $0.0000175.

Is TCG a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap meme token dynamics on Solana. Position sizes should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket only).

What are the key risks of holding TCG?

Extreme price decline (-56.4% in 24h) with no clear bottom established • Total liquidity of only $8.99K — catastrophic slippage risk for any meaningful position • Top 10 holders control 60.02% of supply — extreme dump risk

← Back to all predictions

Track TCG