How concentrated is Pokémon ownership?

The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 312 holder addresses (2026-05-03 07:47 UTC).

Are large holders selling Pokémon?

Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.

Is Pokémon liquidity falling?

This report saved one reading, $8,989.31 (2026-05-03 07:47 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

Pokémon Price Today & AI Analysis

TCGSolanaAnalysis as of May 3, 2026

$0.0₅1996

-12.22% 24h

Contract

Live

CBLpK9s2RzRdpD4M1xrsm8nWQQqCo59kDRVyFtQmpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

161

Market cap

$1,994

At a $1M market cap, $TCG would be $0.001001 (502x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is TCG a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 9

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

0.02%1 insider still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about TCG

3 free answers a day

Pokémon: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-05-03 07:47 UTC

Holder addresses

312

Top 10 supply share

Not in this report

Reported liquidity

$8,989.31

How concentrated is Pokémon ownership?: The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 312 holder addresses (2026-05-03 07:47 UTC).
Are large holders selling Pokémon?: Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.
Is Pokémon liquidity falling?: This report saved one reading, $8,989.31 (2026-05-03 07:47 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-03 07:47 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 3, 07:47 AM UTC

FDV

$13,584

Liquidity

$8,989.31

Holders

312

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Pokémon (TCG) is a meme/brand-name token on Solana launched via PumpSwap with mint address CBLpK9s2RzRdpD4M1xrsm8nWQQqCo59kDRVyFtQmpump. With a fully diluted valuation of only ~$13.6K and total liquidity of ~$8.99K, this is an extremely micro-cap token. The token has experienced a severe 56.4% price decline in the past 24 hours, with 72% sell pressure dominating trading activity. Holder count surged from 41 to 368 on May 1st before dropping back to 312, suggesting a pump-and-dump dynamic. The update authority has NOT been renounced (held by TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM), and the contract is unverified. The top holder (the PumpSwap liquidity pool) controls 33.56% of supply, and the top 10 wallets collectively hold 60.02%.

Key points

Extremely low FDV (~$13.6K) and liquidity (~$8.99K) — ultra micro-cap with high manipulation risk
Severe 24h price decline of -56.4% with 72% sell pressure indicating active distribution
Holder base exploded from 41 to 368 in a single day (May 1) then dropped to 312 — classic pump-and-dump pattern
Top 10 holders control 60.02% of supply; top 100 control 97.97% — extreme concentration
Update authority not renounced; contract unverified — elevated rug risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

Price is in a clear downtrend from a high of ~$0.0000317 (candle 24) to the current ~$0.0000136, a decline of ~57% over 24 hours. Sell pressure at 72% and 420 sells vs 281 buys confirm continued distribution. A minor 5m bounce of +3.6% and 1h bounce of +1.6% may represent a dead-cat bounce. The path of least resistance remains downward given the overwhelming sell pressure and declining holder count.

Target low

$0.0000100

Target high

$0.0000175

Support: $0.0000136 (current price / recent low), $0.0000127 (candle 4 low), $0.0000100 (psychological round number)
Resistance: $0.0000175 (candle 6 close), $0.0000225 (candle 7 close / candle 13 close area), $0.0000251 (candle 8 high — 24h peak)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

The token was dormant with only 41 holders for the entire month of April before a sudden spike on May 1. This pattern is consistent with a coordinated pump. With 97.97% of supply held by the top 100 wallets, ongoing distribution by early holders is likely. Unless a significant catalyst emerges (e.g., viral social media traction, exchange listing), the token is likely to continue declining toward negligible value.

Catalysts

Viral social media campaign leveraging the Pokémon brand name
Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all micro-caps
New exchange or DEX listing increasing liquidity and visibility
Coordinated community buyback effort

Bullish factors

Minor short-term bounce signals (+3.6% in 5m, +1.6% in 1h) suggest possible temporary relief rally
Pokémon brand name has broad cultural recognition that could attract speculative interest
Some snipers remain in profit (39.3%, 37.5%, 17.4% realized PnL), suggesting not all early money has exited
Token is mutable=false, reducing some manipulation vectors

Bearish factors

Price down -56.4% in 24 hours with 72% sell pressure (420 sells vs 281 buys)
Holder count dropped -54 (-17%) in 24 hours — active exit
Top 10 holders control 60.02%; top 100 control 97.97% — extreme concentration risk
Total liquidity only $8.99K — any meaningful sell order will cause severe slippage
Update authority not renounced — potential rug vector
Token was dormant for entire April (41 holders, zero change) before sudden pump — highly suspicious
Multiple snipers showing large realized losses (-70.8%, -69.2%, -53.3%) suggesting they are still holding and may dump

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extremely small market cap and liquidity, making price highly susceptible to single-wallet manipulation. Sniper data is largely incomplete (amounts unknown), and the token's history is only ~2 days old with meaningful trading activity. The meme coin space is inherently unpredictable.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: CBLpK9...pump
Total Supply: 999,666,525.75

Key Risks

Extreme price decline (-56.4% in 24h) with no clear bottom established
Total liquidity of only $8.99K — catastrophic slippage risk for any meaningful position
Top 10 holders control 60.02% of supply — extreme dump risk
Token was dormant for 27 days before a sudden pump — highly suspicious launch pattern

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 24-hour OHLC series (candles 24→1, oldest to newest) shows a clear bearish trend. The token opened around $0.0000317 (candle 24) and has declined to $0.0000136 (candle 1), a ~57% drop. The highest point was candle 24's open/high at $0.0000317. Candle 8 (00:00 UTC May 3) printed a high of $0.0000251, representing a lower high after the initial peak — confirming a downtrend of lower highs and lower lows. Candles 5–7 show a sharp sell-off from $0.0000226 to $0.0000130 with high volume (955–1827 USD/hr). The most recent candles (1–2) show very low volume (205–249 USD) and tight ranges, suggesting price exhaustion but no clear reversal signal.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Both short-term and medium-term trends are firmly bearish. The token has printed a series of lower highs and lower lows over the past 24 hours, declining from $0.0000317 to $0.0000136. No bullish reversal pattern has been confirmed. The slight uptick in the last 5m/1h is insufficient to call a trend change.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

28%

Sell

72%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000136 (current price, recent candle low)

Major support

$0.0000127 (candle 4 intraday low — $0.000012707)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000175 (candle 6 close — $0.000014949, candle 7 close area)

Major resistance

$0.0000251 (candle 8 high — $0.0000251178, 24h peak)

The $0.0000136 level is the current price and recent low, acting as immediate support. A break below $0.0000127 (candle 4 low) would signal further downside with little structural support. On the upside, $0.0000175 is the first meaningful resistance from the candle 6–7 close zone. The $0.0000251 level (candle 8 high) represents the 24h peak and major resistance that would require a significant catalyst to reclaim.

Notable patterns

Bearish cascade: series of lower highs and lower lows across all 24 candles
High-volume distribution candles at 14:00–20:00 UTC May 2 (candles 12, 14, 18 each >2,000 USD volume) followed by price collapse
Dead-cat bounce candidate: candles 8–9 showed a brief recovery to $0.0000251 before resuming downtrend
Volume exhaustion: last 2 candles show dramatically reduced volume (205–249 USD) suggesting selling pressure is tapering
Bearish engulfing pattern visible in candle 7→8 sequence where price briefly recovered then was overwhelmed by sellers in candle 7 (open $0.0000226, close $0.0000175 on 1,827 USD volume)

Liquidity

$8,989.31

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $8.99K is dangerously shallow — any trade above a few hundred dollars will cause significant slippage. The 24h sell volume ($15.99K) is 2.57x the buy volume ($6.23K), confirming strong net outflow. Unique sellers (212) outnumber unique buyers (103) by more than 2:1. The FDV of $13.22K is barely above the liquidity pool value of $8.99K, meaning the liquidity pool represents ~68% of the entire market cap — a sign of an extremely illiquid and fragile market. The pair trades on PumpSwap (69jiwmRZWa3Msg5TSPM3goD9vTSv7rrV3oE8oXjbbrQe), which is a permissionless AMM. Any large holder exiting would drain the pool significantly and cause catastrophic price impact.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,666,525.75

FDV

$13,584.16

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price declined -56.4% in 24 hours from a high of ~$0.0000317 to ~$0.0000136. The token has demonstrated extreme intraday volatility with swings of 50%+ within single hours (e.g., candle 17: low $0.0000156, high $0.0000249). This level of volatility is consistent with micro-cap meme tokens subject to pump-and-dump dynamics.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $8.99K on a single PumpSwap pool. The FDV ($13.22K) barely exceeds the liquidity pool value, meaning the market is extremely thin. Any sell order above ~$500 would cause severe slippage. Exit liquidity for larger holders is essentially non-existent.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme price decline (-56.4% in 24h) with no clear bottom established
Total liquidity of only $8.99K — catastrophic slippage risk for any meaningful position
Top 10 holders control 60.02% of supply — extreme dump risk
Token was dormant for 27 days before a sudden pump — highly suspicious launch pattern
Update authority not renounced — metadata manipulation possible
Unverified contract with unauthorized use of Pokémon IP — legal/delisting risk
Multiple snipers still holding at significant losses — potential future dump pressure
Holder count declining rapidly (-17% in 24h) — active exit by participants

Mitigating factors

Token marked as mutable=false, reducing some metadata manipulation risk
PumpFun launch mechanism typically burns mint authority upon graduation
Some snipers have already exited profitably, reducing future sniper dump pressure
The Pokémon brand has broad cultural recognition that could attract new speculative buyers
Minor short-term price stabilization signals (5m +3.6%, 1h +1.6%) suggest temporary selling exhaustion

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap meme token dynamics on Solana. Position sizes should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket only).

TCG (Pokémon) is an ultra-micro-cap meme token on Solana that appears to have undergone a classic pump-and-dump cycle. The token sat dormant for 27 days with 41 holders before exploding to 368 holders on May 1, followed by a -56.4% price collapse within 24 hours. With $8.99K in liquidity, 60% supply concentration in the top 10 wallets, and overwhelming sell pressure (72%), the risk/reward profile is extremely unfavorable. The only speculative case rests on the Pokémon brand name attracting new buyers, but this is offset by severe structural weaknesses.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A viral social media campaign or broader Solana meme coin rally attracts new buyers to the Pokémon brand name, causing a short-term price recovery of 2–5x from current levels. Early snipers who are still in profit provide a floor by holding, and new retail FOMO drives volume.

Viral Pokémon/TCG cultural moment driving speculative interest
Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting micro-caps
Coordinated community buyback or influencer promotion
Oversold conditions attracting contrarian buyers

Base Case

The token stabilizes at current depressed levels (~$0.0000100–$0.0000136) with minimal trading activity, gradually losing remaining holders as interest fades. The token becomes effectively illiquid and dormant, similar to its April state, but at a much lower price.

Selling pressure gradually exhausts as most motivated sellers have already exited
No new significant catalyst emerges to drive fresh buying interest
Remaining holders are long-term bagholders unwilling to sell at current losses
Liquidity pool remains intact but thin, preventing complete price discovery collapse

Bear Case

High probability

Continued distribution by top holders and remaining snipers drains the $8.99K liquidity pool, causing price to collapse toward zero. The unauthorized Pokémon IP usage leads to platform delistings. Holder count continues declining as participants exit.

Top 10 holders (60.02% of supply) continuing to distribute
Remaining loss-making snipers dumping on any price recovery
Liquidity pool drainage making exit impossible for remaining holders
Platform action against unauthorized Pokémon IP usage
No fundamental utility or development activity evident

Analysis details

Generated

May 3, 07:47 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-03 07:47 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, authority, supply, decimals)
PumpSwap DEX OHLC candle data (24 hourly candles)
Trading analytics (volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and distribution data
Historical holder time series (30 days daily)
Top 20 holder wallet data with balances and percentages
Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)
Price feed (USD and SOL-denominated)

Limitations

Sniper USD amounts sniped are unknown — sniper concentration percentage is estimated and imprecise
Mint authority and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — classified as unknown
Token is only ~2 days old with meaningful trading activity, limiting historical pattern analysis
No order book data available — slippage estimates are approximations based on liquidity pool size
Social sentiment data not available beyond the presence of Twitter/website links
The update authority wallet (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM) has not been analyzed for historical behavior
Holder acquisition breakdown (swap=298, transfer=14) does not identify specific whale wallet origins

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The analyst has no position in TCG. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Pokémon (TCG) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 9, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Pokémon (TCG)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 9, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for Pokémon (TCG)?

Is TCG a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap meme token dynamics on Solana. Position sizes should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket only).

What are the key risks of holding TCG?

Extreme price decline (-56.4% in 24h) with no clear bottom established • Total liquidity of only $8.99K — catastrophic slippage risk for any meaningful position • Top 10 holders control 60.02% of supply — extreme dump risk