Tokens

Tokens Price Today & AI Analysis

TokensSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 19, 2026

Price

$0.000144

+214.20% 24h · FDV $131,623

Contract

Live
C3b3fpyRWsJf3bo6vay2vo1bQ7CezwumZwTrP82Lpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,232

Market cap

$131,623

More tokens on Solana

BRRRBRRRBRRR$0.001757+3974.0%MC $1.76MDDNUTKrispy Kreme, Inc. Common Stock - Backpack Securities$3.1+0.2%MC $117.6K$WIF$WIFdogwifhat$0.2141+15.2%MC $213.90MCYPHCYPHCypherpunk Technologies - Backpack Securities$3.49-5.7%MC $448.6KALCHALCHAlchemist AI$0.0398+15.3%MC $39.76MZECZECZcash$1,568.94+8.3%MC $160.58M

Tokens: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-19 22:16 UTC

Holder addresses

1,232

Top 10 supply share

31.73%

Reported liquidity

$17,697.00
How concentrated is Tokens ownership?
As of 2026-09-19 22:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 31.73% of supply. It reports 1,232 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Tokens?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-19 22:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $745,923.00 in buys and $730,349.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Tokens liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +203.06%, from $6,219.54 (2026-09-19 20:00 UTC) to $18,848.85 (2026-09-19 22:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-19 22:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-19 20:00 UTC$6,219.54
2026-09-19 21:00 UTC$21,823.11
2026-09-19 22:00 UTC$18,848.85

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about Tokens

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 19, 10:17 PM UTC

FDV

$131,623

Liquidity

$17,697.00

Holders

1,232

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Tokens (Tokens) is a Pump.fun-derived SPL token trading on PumpSwap with a tiny liquidity pool (~$17.7K) and a fully diluted valuation of roughly $131.6K. Price has been extremely volatile, up ~214% in 24h per the reported figure, but the 3 available hourly candles show wild intra-hour swings (e.g., a candle ranging from $0.0000041 to $0.0000667 to a close of $0.0000196) that are more indicative of a newly-launched, thinly-traded, high-volatility asset than a stable trend. Authority/renouncement data, holder history, and sniper coverage are all unavailable, which materially limits confidence in any risk or growth claims.

Key points

  • Extremely small liquidity pool (~$17.7K) relative to 24h volume of >$1.47M combined buy+sell, implying high slippage and price impact risk
  • 24h price change of +214% is likely driven by a handful of large hourly candle spikes rather than sustained, broad-based demand
  • Mint/freeze authority status and rug risk from authorities are unknown — no on-chain verification was available
  • Holder base of 1,232 addresses with top-10 holding ~31.7% of supply, but no historical trend data to confirm accumulation or distribution
  • Marketing claims (AI token utility, fee redistribution) are unverified creator-supplied claims and should be treated as unconfirmed marketing rather than fact

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

The token just experienced a massive volatility spike (candle range from ~$0.0000041 to ~$0.000747 within a single hour) followed by a pullback to ~$0.0001438. With only three hourly candles available and a very shallow liquidity pool (~$17.7K), short-term price action is likely to remain highly erratic and dominated by large individual trades rather than organic trend continuation.

Target low

$0.00007

Target high

$0.00025

Support

$0.0000949 (intra-candle low of most recent hour), $0.0000167 (prior candle low)

Resistance

$0.000251 (recent candle high), $0.000747 (extreme spike high, likely an outlier/wick)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the absence of extended OHLC history, holder growth trends, and authority verification. Sustainability will depend on whether liquidity deepens, buy/sell pressure remains balanced (currently near 50/50), and whether the token's stated AI-utility narrative attracts sustained holder growth beyond the current 1,232 addresses.

Catalysts

  • Potential liquidity additions or migration to deeper pools
  • Marketing/utility rollout (AI model access claims) driving organic demand
  • Broader memecoin/PumpSwap market sentiment
  • Risk of large holders (top 10 hold ~31.7%) exiting positions given no lock-up or vesting data available

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume ($745.92K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($730.35K), a marginal net positive skew
  • 3,650 unique buyers vs 2,992 unique sellers in 24h suggests broader buyer participation
  • Token has an active narrative (AI model access utility) and social presence (Twitter, website) that could support demand if verified

Bearish factors

  • Liquidity of only ~$17.7K is extremely shallow relative to >$1.47M in 24h volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Extreme intra-hour volatility (single-hour range from $0.0000041 to $0.0000667 to $0.0000196) signals an immature, thinly-traded, possibly manipulated market
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or trading freezes
  • No sniper or historical holder data available to assess early-buyer dumping risk
  • Top 10 holders control ~31.7% of supply with no visibility into lock-ups or vesting

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles and no historical holder or sniper data are available, and authority renouncement status is unknown. The reported 24h price change (+214%) is disproportionate to the visible candle data and liquidity depth, suggesting either a data anomaly, a very recent launch, or an extremely thin, manipulable market. Confidence in any directional prediction is therefore low.

Tokens call history

Full track record →

Sep 19neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
C3b3fp...pump
Total Supply
915,072,364.12 Tokens

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$17.7K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unverified mint/freeze authority status — no confirmation that supply cannot be inflated or trading frozen
  • Extreme short-term volatility with candle wicks suggesting possible wash trading or thin-book manipulation
  • Top-10 holder concentration of ~31.73% with no visibility into lock-ups, vesting, or identity of these holders

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only three hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (20:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000407, spiked to a high of $0.0000667, then closed near the open-range at $0.0000196 — a long-upper-wick candle suggesting a sharp pump quickly faded. Candle 2 (21:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000196, spiked dramatically to $0.000747 (nearly 40x the open) before closing at $0.000157 — an extreme wick/spike pattern typical of a low-liquidity pool absorbing a large buy order and then reverting. Candle 3 (22:00 UTC) opened at $0.000157, ranged between $0.0000948 and $0.000251, and closed at $0.0001438, showing continued high volatility but a narrower relative range than candle 2.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price action shows a strong upward move from candle 1 to candle 2's peak, but subsequent price action in candle 3 shows consolidation/pullback rather than continuation, suggesting the medium-term trend is directionless/sideways pending more data.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000948 (low of most recent candle)

Major support

$0.0000167 (low of candle 2)

Immediate resistance

$0.000251 (high of most recent candle)

Major resistance

$0.000747 (extreme spike high of candle 2, likely an outlier)

Support levels are derived from the lows of the two most recent hourly candles ($0.0000948 and $0.0000167), while resistance is drawn from recent highs ($0.000251) and the extreme wick high ($0.000747). The wide gap between these levels reflects the token's very high volatility and thin liquidity, meaning any support/resistance levels should be treated as provisional given only 3 candles of data.

Notable patterns

  • Long upper-wick spike candle (candle 2) suggestive of a pump-and-fade / possible wash-trading or single large buy absorbed by shallow liquidity
  • Volume climax followed by sharp volume decay (candle 2 to candle 3), consistent with exhaustion after a speculative spike
  • Narrowing range in candle 3 relative to candle 2 could indicate consolidation, but sample size is too small to confirm

Liquidity

Liquidity

$17,697.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of only ~$17.70K is extremely shallow relative to the reported 24h combined trading volume of over $1.47M, implying a very high liquidity-to-volume mismatch (volume is roughly 83x liquidity). This mismatch typically produces high slippage on even modest-sized trades and increases vulnerability to price manipulation, as seen in the extreme intra-hour candle spikes. Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.5% vs 49.5%), and unique buyers (3,650) modestly exceed unique sellers (2,992) in the 24h window, suggesting broad participation but not overwhelming net accumulation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

915,072,364.12 Tokens

FDV

$131,623

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Hourly candles show extreme swings, including one candle ranging from $0.0000041 to $0.0000667 and another spiking to $0.000747 before closing at $0.000157 — moves of multiple hundred percent within single hours.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of ~$17.70K is very shallow compared to >$1.47M in 24h trading volume, creating a high risk of slippage and price manipulation on trades of even modest size.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control ~31.73% of supply, a moderate-to-high concentration; however, top-100 concentration and any wallet classification/lock-up data are unavailable, so full concentration risk cannot be assessed.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$17.7K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unverified mint/freeze authority status — no confirmation that supply cannot be inflated or trading frozen
  • Extreme short-term volatility with candle wicks suggesting possible wash trading or thin-book manipulation
  • Top-10 holder concentration of ~31.73% with no visibility into lock-ups, vesting, or identity of these holders
  • No sniper data available to assess early-buyer dump risk
  • Token description contains unverified marketing claims (AI model access utility) from an adversarial/untrusted source that should not be taken at face value
  • Only a single current holder snapshot (1,232 addresses) exists — no historical trend to confirm organic, sustained growth

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy and sell volumes are roughly balanced (50.5%/49.5%), which does not show one-sided dumping pressure at the aggregate level
  • Unique buyer count (3,650) exceeds unique seller count (2,992) in the 24h window, indicating broad-based participation rather than a single large actor dominating trade flow
  • Token has visible social presence (Twitter, website), though this does not verify legitimacy

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. It is not appropriate for conservative investors, those seeking stable or predictable returns, or anyone unable to withstand extreme volatility and thin-liquidity slippage. Given unresolved authority risk and missing sniper/holder-history data, position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

Tokens is a highly speculative, newly volatile PumpSwap-listed token with shallow liquidity, an unverified authority structure, and an unproven AI-utility narrative. The available data shows a dramatic (and likely unsustainable) price spike accompanied by near-balanced buy/sell flow, moderate holder concentration, and multiple unresolved data gaps (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history) that materially limit confidence in any investment case.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the token's AI-model-access utility narrative gains real traction and liquidity deepens meaningfully beyond the current $17.7K, sustained organic demand from the 3,650+ daily unique buyers could support a higher valuation base and reduce volatility over time.

  • Utility claim (discounted/free AI model access for 10,000+ token holders) could attract a genuine user base if delivered and verified
  • Buy volume slightly outpacing sell volume (50.5% vs 49.5%) and buyers outnumbering sellers (3,650 vs 2,992) in 24h
  • Active social presence (Twitter, website) could support community-driven growth

Base Case

Absent new catalysts or liquidity growth, the token likely continues to trade with high volatility and thin liquidity, oscillating within the recent candle range (~$0.00009–$0.00025) without a clear sustained directional trend, pending more data on holder behavior and authority status.

  • No material change in liquidity depth in the near term
  • Buy/sell volume remains roughly balanced as observed in the 24h window
  • No new verified information emerges on mint/freeze authority or sniper activity that would materially change the risk profile

Bear Case

High probability

Given the extremely shallow liquidity, unresolved authority risk, and an extreme, likely unsustainable price spike (candle high of $0.000747 versus a close of $0.0001438), the token could rapidly retrace toward pre-spike levels, especially if large holders (top 10 at ~31.7%) or unidentified early buyers exit positions.

  • Shallow $17.7K liquidity pool makes the token highly susceptible to sharp downside moves on modest sell orders
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open unresolved rug/dilution risk
  • No sniper or holder-history data to rule out coordinated early-buyer dumping
  • Volume already decayed ~91% from its candle-2 peak, suggesting the initial buying frenzy has faded

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 19, 10:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-19 22:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • PumpSwap pair pricing data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were provided, insufficient for robust technical analysis or reliable support/resistance identification
  • No sniper data was available, preventing assessment of early-buyer/sniper concentration or profit-taking risk
  • No historical holder count data exists, preventing any holder growth trend or accumulation/distribution analysis
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status are all unknown, leaving rug-risk-from-authorities unresolved
  • Top-100 holder concentration and wallet classification data were not available
  • Token description and social claims are creator-supplied and unverified, and are treated as untrusted marketing data, not fact

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (sniper data, holder history, authority verification). The token exhibits extreme volatility and very shallow liquidity, characteristics associated with very high risk of loss. Users should conduct their own independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Tokens ownership?

As of 2026-09-19 22:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 31.73% of supply. It reports 1,232 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Tokens?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-19 22:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $745,923.00 in buys and $730,349.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Tokens liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +203.06%, from $6,219.54 (2026-09-19 20:00 UTC) to $18,848.85 (2026-09-19 22:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Tokens (Tokens)?

The token just experienced a massive volatility spike (candle range from ~$0.0000041 to ~$0.000747 within a single hour) followed by a pullback to ~$0.0001438. With only three hourly candles available and a very shallow liquidity pool (~$17.7K), short-term price action is likely to remain highly erratic and dominated by large individual trades rather than organic trend continuation. Short-term outlook is neutral (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.00007 to $0.00025.

Is Tokens a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 85/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. It is not appropriate for conservative investors, those seeking stable or predictable returns, or anyone unable to withstand extreme volatility and thin-liquidity slippage. Given unresolved authority risk and missing sniper/holder-history data, position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

What are the key risks of holding Tokens?

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$17.7K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Unverified mint/freeze authority status — no confirmation that supply cannot be inflated or trading frozen • Extreme short-term volatility with candle wicks suggesting possible wash trading or thin-book manipulation

← Back to all predictions

Track Tokens