How concentrated is Hooked ownership?

As of 2026-09-28 21:15 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 12.57% of supply, out of 3,520 holder addresses.

Are large holders selling Hooked?

In the 24 hours to 2026-09-28 21:15 UTC, DEX buys were $1,648,902.00 and sells $1,607,369.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.

Is Hooked liquidity falling?

Liquidity fell 1.83%, from $99,611.91 (2026-09-28 20:00 UTC) to $97,792.37 (2026-09-28 21:00 UTC).

Hooked Price Today & AI Analysis

HOOKEDSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 28, 2026

$0.000346

-9.05% 24h

Contract

Live

C1mBfBoDkwWfd6uTFZp62ARHLjeVp3bDpCDMfMZtPngE

Chain

Solana

Holders

11,132

Market cap

$315,549

At a $1M market cap, $HOOKED would be $0.001097 (3.17x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is HOOKED a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 12

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about HOOKED

3 free answers a day

Hooked: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-09-28 21:15 UTC

Holder addresses

3,520

Top 10 supply share

12.57%

Reported liquidity

$53,672.00

How concentrated is Hooked ownership?: As of 2026-09-28 21:15 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 12.57% of supply, out of 3,520 holder addresses.
Are large holders selling Hooked?: In the 24 hours to 2026-09-28 21:15 UTC, DEX buys were $1,648,902.00 and sells $1,607,369.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.
Is Hooked liquidity falling?: Liquidity fell 1.83%, from $99,611.91 (2026-09-28 20:00 UTC) to $97,792.37 (2026-09-28 21:00 UTC).

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Unhosted token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-28 21:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)	Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-28 20:00 UTC	$99,611.91
2026-09-28 21:00 UTC	$97,792.37

A liquidity change compares the first and last samples, which may be less than 24 hours apart. USD liquidity also moves with asset prices, not only with deposits and withdrawals.

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

2026-09-28 21:15 UTCSell · $11.722W4cVZaT…21gUtwWallet 7hZLMEyV…6G46FS
2026-09-28 21:15 UTCBuy · $11.425DeyJnHp…nWEV8EWallet 8WHsjoYX…rn5zKp
2026-09-28 21:15 UTCBuy · $10.892VMmF3if…tJxM9RWallet bxtK8rqr…SVrCwS
2026-09-28 21:15 UTCSell · $986.55iy6VsYWS…z3b1JaWallet 8dppJhzr…53tELz
2026-09-28 21:15 UTCBuy · $102.7137K9HY6w…vpyMDqWallet HkcDy3dH…eq6zGh
2026-09-28 21:15 UTCBuy · $203.94582cKdKs…gkb72HWallet 2CiVkWRR…dP61bf
2026-09-28 21:15 UTCBuy · $177.393ikoVCV5…2qkP4bWallet HPMgHDGd…X9XGiL
2026-09-28 21:15 UTCSell · $1.702pToN7Jw…hefA3QWallet C14ujapU…jCurWv
2026-09-28 21:15 UTCBuy · $11.414smZn7dG…CP8cnNWallet E9vdqkSn…AfACtp
2026-09-28 21:14 UTCBuy · $5.719NoBuDj1…TFc7V1Wallet 4gZtypku…W7dQLi

Report snapshot

as of Sep 28, 09:16 PM UTC

FDV

$1,232,421

Liquidity

$53,672.00

Holders

3,520

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

HOOKED (C1mBfBoDkwWfd6uTFZp62ARHLjeVp3bDpCDMfMZtPngE) is a newly-launched Solana token trading on a Meteora DAMM pool, notable for embedding a custom transfer hook that runs logic on every trade. It has just undergone an extreme +1768% 24h price spike to a high of $0.00213 before pulling back to ~$0.00124, on very thin liquidity of ~$53.67K against a $1.23M fully diluted valuation. Critical due-diligence data — mint/freeze authority status, sniper wallet activity, and holder history — are all unavailable, leaving significant unresolved risk.

Key points

Implements an on-chain Solana transfer hook enforcing custom trade-time rules, a differentiator versus standard SPL tokens
Experienced an extreme, near-vertical price spike (+1768% 24h, +118% 1h) followed by a sharp volume decay (~89%) typical of pump-and-fade launch dynamics
Very thin liquidity (~$53.67K) relative to volume (~$3.26M/24h) and FDV ($1.23M), creating high slippage and volatility risk
Top-10 holder concentration is a comparatively modest 12.57%, though broader concentration (top-100) and holder history are unavailable

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

Given the fading volume and volatile pullback from the $0.00213 spike high to ~$0.00124, near-term price action is likely to remain choppy and range-bound between the recent low and high, with directional bias unclear given only two candles of data.

Target low

$0.00090

Target high

$0.00160

Support: $0.00099, $0.0000041 (extreme pre-pump base, unlikely but structurally present)
Resistance: $0.00147, $0.00213

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the token's very short trading history (data covers only ~2 hours of candles). Sustained upside would require continued volume and liquidity growth, while a lack of new catalysts or liquidity could see price drift toward pre-spike levels.

Catalysts

Liquidity additions to the Meteora DAMM pool reducing slippage risk
Clarification/verification of mint and freeze authority status
Broader adoption or attention around the transfer-hook mechanic
Continued buyer-dominant flow versus renewed selling pressure

Bullish factors

More unique buyers (6,095) than sellers (4,148) in the last 24h
Buy volume (50.6%) slightly exceeds sell volume (49.4%)
Novel transfer-hook token design may attract speculative/niche interest
Modest top-10 holder concentration (12.57%) relative to typical new launches

Bearish factors

~89% volume decay between the two available candles, suggesting fading momentum
Extremely thin liquidity ($53.67K) vulnerable to sharp downside moves
Unknown mint/freeze authority and unverified contract status
No sniper coverage data to rule out concentrated early-wallet dump risk
Classic post-pump retracement pattern already visible (high $0.00213 to $0.00124 close)

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the dataset includes only two hourly candles, no sniper/holder history data, and unresolved authority/verification status — all of which are critical inputs for a reliable price forecast on a token this new and volatile.

HOOKED call history

Full track record →

Sep 28neutral@ $0.00124

24h—

7d—

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: C1mBfB...PngE
Total Supply: 991,122,113.81 HOOKED

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$53.67K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and potential for sharp price swings on modest order sizes
Unknown mint/freeze authority status means the possibility of further token minting or account freezing cannot be ruled out
No sniper/early-buyer data available, so the risk of concentrated early wallets dumping on new buyers cannot be assessed
Token implements a custom Solana transfer hook ('rules built into the token itself') whose logic is not verified in this data set and could impose unexpected transfer constraints or fees

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle [1] (20:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000041 and spiked to a high of $0.00213 before closing at $0.00131 on massive volume (~$4.51M) — an extreme, near-vertical launch/pump candle with a huge range (~518x from open to high). Candle [2] (21:00 UTC) opened at $0.00131, pushed to a high of $0.00147, dropped to a low of $0.00099, and closed at $0.00124, on much lower volume (~$517K) — a smaller-bodied candle showing consolidation/retracement after the initial spike, with a long lower wick suggesting dip-buying support near $0.00099.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The available 2-hour window shows an explosive short-term uptrend (24h change +1768.5%, 1h change +118.1%) followed by a pullback and stabilization. With only two candles, no reliable medium-term trend can be established beyond calling it a fresh, highly volatile launch phase.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00099 (candle [2] low)

Major support

$0.0000041 (candle [1] open / origin low, effectively pre-pump base)

Immediate resistance

$0.00147 (candle [2] high)

Major resistance

$0.00213 (candle [1] high, the all-time high in this dataset)

With only two hourly candles, support/resistance levels are provisional. The $0.00099 low of the most recent candle acts as near-term support; a break below could open a retest of much lower levels given the token's newness. The $0.00147–$0.00213 zone represents recent highs and likely resistance, with $0.00213 being the extreme spike high that may not be easily reclaimed without fresh volume.

Notable patterns

Parabolic spike candle with long upper wick (candle 1) indicative of a launch pump and subsequent rejection from highs
Long lower wick on candle 2 suggesting a dip-buy/support test near $0.00099
Sharp volume decay (~89%) between candle 1 and candle 2, consistent with fading initial hype
Extremely wide intra-candle range in candle 1 (over 500x from open to high) typical of illiquid new listings

Liquidity

$53,672.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of only ~$53.67K is extremely thin relative to a 24h trading volume of roughly $3.26M combined (buy+sell), implying the pool is being churned dozens of times over in a single day — a strong indicator of high volatility and high slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade. Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.6% vs 49.4%), and buyer count (6,095) outpaces seller count (4,148), suggesting more distinct wallets are buying than selling, but this doesn't guarantee net positive price impact given the shallow liquidity. The mismatch between a $1.23M FDV and $53.67K of liquidity is a material risk: large orders, whether buys or sells, could move price dramatically, and this is consistent with the observed candle behavior (huge intra-hour wicks).

Supply & authorities

Total supply

991,122,113.81 HOOKED

FDV

$1.23M

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +1768.5% and 1h change of +118.1%, combined with a first candle ranging from $0.0000041 to $0.00213 (over 500x), indicate extreme volatility typical of a very fresh, thinly-traded launch.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only ~$53.67K against ~$3.26M in combined 24h volume and a $1.23M FDV, meaning the pool can be easily moved by moderate-sized trades, creating high slippage and exit risk.
Concentrationunknown
Only top-10 concentration (12.57%) is available; top-100 concentration and wallet classification data are not provided, so full concentration risk cannot be assessed. The available top-10 figure alone is not sufficient to rule out risk further down the holder list.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$53.67K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and potential for sharp price swings on modest order sizes
Unknown mint/freeze authority status means the possibility of further token minting or account freezing cannot be ruled out
No sniper/early-buyer data available, so the risk of concentrated early wallets dumping on new buyers cannot be assessed
Token implements a custom Solana transfer hook ('rules built into the token itself') whose logic is not verified in this data set and could impose unexpected transfer constraints or fees
Extreme recent volatility (+1768% 24h, spike to $0.00213 then pullback to ~$0.00124) suggests speculative, possibly unsustainable price action typical of very new launches
Holder count snapshot (3,520) has no historical trend data, preventing assessment of whether the holder base is growing organically or is a one-time airdrop/bot artifact

Mitigating factors

Top-10 holder concentration of 12.57% is comparatively modest versus many new token launches where top holders often exceed 30-50%
24h buyer count (6,095) exceeds seller count (4,148), and buy/sell volume is roughly balanced (50.6%/49.4%), suggesting broad-based participation rather than one-sided dumping in the available window
Token has social presence (Twitter, website) suggesting some public-facing project effort, though this does not verify legitimacy

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders comfortable with extreme volatility, thin liquidity, and significant unresolved due-diligence gaps (authorities, sniper coverage, holder history). Not suitable for risk-averse investors or those seeking stable, well-documented assets. Position sizing should be minimal given the very high overall risk profile.

HOOKED is a brand-new, extremely volatile Solana token that just experienced a parabolic launch spike (+1768% 24h) followed by a pullback, trading on a shallow ~$53.67K liquidity pool against a $1.23M FDV. Data gaps around mint/freeze authorities, sniper wallets, and holder history prevent a full risk clearance, and the token's custom transfer-hook mechanism adds an additional layer of unverified complexity. Any thesis here is inherently speculative and short-term in nature.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buying pressure and social/community interest (Twitter, website presence) continue to outpace selling, and the transfer-hook mechanic proves to be a genuine differentiating feature that attracts sustained trader interest, the token could retest or exceed its recent high of $0.00213, especially given more buyers (6,095) than sellers (4,148) in the last 24h.

Continued buyer-dominant order flow (50.6% buy vs 49.4% sell volume, more unique buyers than sellers)
Novelty of an on-chain transfer-hook-enforced token mechanic drawing speculative attention
Relatively modest top-10 concentration (12.57%) reducing (but not eliminating) single-whale dump risk

Base Case

Price likely continues to consolidate in a wide range between the recent low (~$0.00099) and high (~$0.00213) as the market digests the initial pump, with volatility remaining elevated and liquidity remaining thin, absent new catalysts or resolved due-diligence items.

No major liquidity injection occurs in the short term
No resolution yet on mint/freeze authority or contract verification status
Sniper/holder coverage remains unavailable, keeping uncertainty elevated
Trading activity continues at a reduced pace relative to the initial launch spike

Bear Case

High probability

Given the extreme volume decay (~89% drop between the two available candles) after the initial pump, the token could continue to fade toward its pre-spike levels or the immediate support at ~$0.00099, especially if speculative buyers exit and the shallow liquidity amplifies downside moves.

Sharp volume decline signaling fading initial hype
Extremely thin liquidity ($53.67K) making the price vulnerable to sharp drops on moderate sell orders
Unknown mint/freeze authority status and unverified transfer-hook logic creating latent tail risk
Classic pump-and-fade pattern visible in the two available candles (huge spike then partial retracement)

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 28, 09:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-28 21:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (mint, decimals, supply)
Meteora DAMM pair price/volume data
Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles provided)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Unhosted holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles were provided, severely limiting technical trend analysis
No sniper/early-buyer data was available, preventing assessment of sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
No holder history was provided — only a current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration; growth trends, whale classification, and top-100 concentration could not be assessed
Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status were all unknown; rug risk from authorities could not be determined
Token metadata fields (name, symbol, description) are self-reported by the token creator and are treated as untrusted, unverified claims, including the description of the transfer-hook mechanism, which was not independently verified against on-chain program logic

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data and is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency tokens, especially newly launched, low-liquidity tokens like HOOKED, carry very high risk of substantial or total loss. Conduct independent due diligence, including direct verification of mint/freeze authorities and contract code, before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Hooked (HOOKED) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 12, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Hooked (HOOKED)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 12, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for Hooked (HOOKED)?

Is HOOKED a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders comfortable with extreme volatility, thin liquidity, and significant unresolved due-diligence gaps (authorities, sniper coverage, holder history). Not suitable for risk-averse investors or those seeking stable, well-documented assets. Position sizing should be minimal given the very high overall risk profile.

What are the key risks of holding HOOKED?

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$53.67K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and potential for sharp price swings on modest order sizes • Unknown mint/freeze authority status means the possibility of further token minting or account freezing cannot be ruled out • No sniper/early-buyer data available, so the risk of concentrated early wallets dumping on new buyers cannot be assessed