CUPSEY

The First Trencher Price Prediction 2026

CUPSEY
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 28, 2026

BwAU6gsimrFhJrRcZqKxQJayfnkyyan63WNCJRWYpump

$0.042302

+31.95%

FDV $22,980

LiveContract:BwAU6gsimrFhJrRcZqKxQJayfnkyyan63WNCJRWYpumpChain:SolanaHolders:1,577Market cap:$22,980

More tokens on Solana

CapyDuck

CapyDuck

Capybara Duck

$0.05540166.4%
MC $5.2K
OGDOGE

OGDOGE

The Original Doge

$0.00314117.1%
MC $2.90M
PONKE

PONKE

PONKE

$0.01473.3%
MC $8.15M
BAYLA

BAYLA

BAYLA

$0.0005764.1%
MC $571.5K
GLOW

GLOW

Gold Aura

$0.04441411.5%
MC $43.3K
ANTFUN

ANTFUN

AntFun

$0.04242.2%
MC $375.84M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about CUPSEY

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jun 28, 05:16 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$102,868

Holders

1,700

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

CUPSEY (The First Trencher) is a Pump.fun-launched Solana meme token with a total supply of 1 (likely 1 with 0 decimals, suggesting a fractional/NFT-like structure or a data anomaly). The token has experienced an extreme 448% price spike in 24 hours, but the underlying data reveals severe red flags: 75.1% sell pressure, a near-zero close on the most recent candle ($0.0000313), mutable metadata with unknown update authority, no top holder data, and a holder history that was flat at 26 for 30 days before a sudden +1,674 holder surge in the last hour. This pattern is consistent with a pump-and-dump or coordinated manipulation event.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme 448% 24h price spike followed by a near-total collapse in the most recent candle (close ~$0.0000313 vs open ~$0.00110)
Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals — highly anomalous tokenomics suggesting possible data error or intentional obfuscation
Holder count was frozen at exactly 26 for 30 consecutive days, then jumped +1,674 in a single hour — a hallmark of artificial activity
75.1% sell pressure with 4,340 sells vs 1,191 buys in 24h — overwhelming distribution
Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk is elevated
No top holder data available, preventing concentration analysis

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The most recent hourly candle (candle [1]) opened at ~$0.00110, spiked to a high of ~$0.00218, then collapsed to a close of ~$0.0000313 — a ~97% intra-candle crash. The current reported price of ~$0.00148 appears to be a partial recovery or data lag. With 75.1% sell pressure, 4,340 sells vs 1,191 buys, and a near-zero recent close, the short-term outlook is strongly bearish.

Target low$0.000031 (recent candle low/close)
Target high$0.00218 (recent candle high, unlikely to reclaim)
Support: $0.000031 (recent candle close / multi-candle low), $0.000031 (floor observed in candle [2] open)
Resistance: $0.00148 (current reported price), $0.00218 (candle [1] high / all-time high observed)

Medium term

bearish
1–30 days

Given the structural anomalies — 30 days of zero holder growth, a sudden artificial-looking holder surge, mutable metadata, unknown authority, and overwhelming sell pressure — medium-term price recovery is highly unlikely without a new coordinated pump. The token lacks organic community growth or utility.

Catalysts
  • Any new coordinated social media pump campaign
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all assets
  • Unexpected viral attention

Bullish factors

  • 448% 24h price gain demonstrates speculative interest exists
  • 1,700 total holders (per current snapshot) suggests some community formation
  • $102.87K liquidity provides some exit capacity
  • PumpSwap listing provides accessible trading venue

Bearish factors

  • Most recent candle closed at ~$0.0000313 — a ~97% intra-candle collapse from the high
  • 75.1% sell pressure: 4,340 sells vs 1,191 buys in 24h
  • Holder count was exactly 26 for 30 consecutive days — strongly suggests artificial/bot activity
  • +1,674 holders added in a single hour is anomalous and likely inorganic
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk elevated
  • No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is a major data anomaly
  • No social links, no verified contract, no description
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme anomalies in the data: the total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is likely a data error or obfuscation, top holder data is unavailable, the holder history is clearly artificial, and the price action shows a near-complete intra-candle collapse. These factors make reliable price modeling impossible.

CUPSEY call history

Full track record →
Jun 28bearish
24h-83.6%
7d-96.7%
30d-99.0%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (16:00 UTC): O=$0.0000313, H=$0.001666, L=$0.0000313, C=$0.001078, V=$455K — a massive bullish engulfing/spike candle from a near-zero base, closing near the midpoint of its range. Candle [1] (17:00 UTC): O=$0.001101, H=$0.002178, L=$0.001039, C=$0.0000313, V=$67K — a bearish engulfing/shooting star that opened near the prior close, spiked to a new high of $0.002178, then collapsed to close at $0.0000313, nearly identical to the prior candle's open. This is a classic 'pump and dump' candle pattern: a spike to all-time high followed by near-total collapse.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 25%Sell 75%

The two-candle sequence shows a sharp pump followed by an equally sharp dump. The close of the most recent candle ($0.0000313) is at the absolute low of the observed range, indicating a strong short-term downtrend. The 30-day historical holder stagnation suggests no meaningful medium-term uptrend exists.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000031 (candle [1] close and candle [2] open/low)
Major$0.000031 (only observed floor in the data)
Resistance
Immediate$0.00148 (current reported price / approximate candle [2] close area)
Major$0.002178 (candle [1] all-time high)

Support is effectively at the near-zero floor of ~$0.0000313, which has been tested twice. Resistance exists at the current price (~$0.00148) and the all-time high of ~$0.00218. The wide spread between support and resistance reflects extreme volatility and thin liquidity.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing in candle [1]: opened near prior close, spiked to ATH, collapsed to near-zero close — classic pump-and-dump candle
  • Candle [2] shows a near-zero open with a massive wick to the upside — initial pump ignition candle
  • Volume declining from pump candle to dump candle — distribution pattern
  • Price % change shown as 0% across all timeframes (5m, 1h, 6h, 24h) despite extreme volatility — possible data feed anomaly or stale price reporting

Total holders1,700
24h Δ+1674
7d Δ+1674
30d Δ+1674
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count was frozen at exactly 26 for all 30 days of historical data (May 29 – June 27, 2026), then surged by +1,674 (98% of current holders) in a single hour coinciding with the price pump. This is a near-perfect correlation between the artificial price spike and the holder surge, strongly suggesting bot-driven or wash-trade-driven holder inflation rather than organic community growth.

The historical holder data is a major red flag. For 30 consecutive days, the holder count was exactly 26 with zero net change. Then, in the 1-hour window coinciding with the price pump, 1,674 new holders appeared — representing 98% of the current 1,700 total. This pattern is inconsistent with organic adoption and is highly consistent with coordinated manipulation, airdrop farming, or bot activity designed to create the appearance of a growing community. The distribution data shows 0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, and 0 octopus — all zeroes — which is anomalous and may indicate a data reporting failure or that all holders hold negligible amounts.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

No top holder data is available for this token — the API returned no results for the top 20 holders. The supply concentration metrics show top10=0% and top100=0%, which is almost certainly a data anomaly given the total supply of 1 with 0 decimals. This lack of transparency is itself a risk signal. Without holder data, it is impossible to assess whale concentration, identify team/treasury wallets, or evaluate dump risk from large holders. The distribution health is classified as 'very_concentrated' by default given the data vacuum and the anomalous tokenomics (total supply of 1).

Liquidity$102.87K
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$131.07K
Sell$395.53K
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers278
Unique sellers1,338

Total liquidity of $102.87K is shallow relative to the $395.53K in 24h sell volume, meaning the pool has been significantly stressed. The FDV of $1.25M against $102.87K liquidity implies an 8.2% liquidity-to-FDV ratio — moderate but concerning given the sell pressure. Net flow is strongly negative: sell volume ($395.53K) is 3x buy volume ($131.07K), and unique sellers (1,338) outnumber unique buyers (278) by nearly 5:1. Slippage risk is high for any meaningful position size given the shallow pool and extreme sell pressure. The pair trades on PumpSwap (5xKxYzu4UdRKQ7Q1LFYivCDgRwdGhZC5UrDza8WEdDKx), which is a lower-liquidity venue than major DEXes.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (with 0 decimals — highly anomalous; likely a data error or intentional obfuscation)
FDV$1.25M (per trading analytics; metadata shows $0.00 FDV — discrepancy)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The tokenomics data is deeply anomalous. The total supply is reported as 1 with 0 decimals, which would make the token non-divisible and effectively an NFT-like asset — yet it is trading as a fungible token with thousands of holders. This is almost certainly a data reporting error, but it cannot be ruled out as intentional obfuscation. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the metadata is mutable — meaning the token creator retains the ability to modify token metadata, which is a significant rug risk vector. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown, preventing a full authority risk assessment. The contract is unverified. There are no social links and no description. The FDV discrepancy ($0.00 in metadata vs $1.25M in trading analytics) further undermines data reliability. All authority-related risks are elevated to 'high' given the unknowns and mutable metadata.

Volatility
high

The token experienced a ~97% intra-candle collapse in candle [1] (from high $0.002178 to close $0.0000313) and a 448% 24h gain — extreme volatility in both directions. Price % change shown as 0% across all timeframes is a data anomaly that may mask further instability.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of $102.87K is shallow. Sell volume ($395.53K) exceeded total liquidity in 24h, indicating the pool is under severe stress. High slippage risk for any position of meaningful size.

Concentration
high

No top holder data is available, making concentration risk unassessable. The total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is anomalous. The distribution metrics show 0% concentration for top 10 and top 100, which is a data anomaly rather than a healthy distribution signal.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available. However, the 4,340 sells vs 1,191 buys, 1,338 unique sellers vs 278 unique buyers, and the intra-candle collapse all indicate active dumping by early entrants, consistent with sniper/early buyer exit behavior.

Authority
high

Metadata is mutable with unknown update authority. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. Unverified contract. No social links or description. These factors collectively represent a high rug-pull risk vector.

Key risks

  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — creator can modify token properties
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is a major data anomaly suggesting possible obfuscation
  • Holder count frozen at exactly 26 for 30 days then +1,674 in 1 hour — strongly artificial
  • 75.1% sell pressure with sellers outnumbering buyers 5:1 by unique wallet count
  • Near-total intra-candle price collapse (~97% from high to close in candle [1])
  • No top holder data — concentration and team wallet risk cannot be assessed
  • No social links, no description, unverified contract — zero transparency
  • Shallow liquidity ($102.87K) relative to sell volume ($395.53K in 24h)
  • Price feed anomaly: 0% change shown across all timeframes despite extreme volatility

Mitigating factors

  • $102.87K liquidity provides some exit capacity for small positions
  • PumpSwap listing provides accessible trading venue
  • 1,700 reported holders (though likely inflated) provides some distribution appearance
  • 24h buy volume of $131.07K shows some speculative demand exists
Suitable for: This token is unsuitable for virtually all investor profiles. The combination of artificial holder growth, extreme sell pressure, mutable/unknown authorities, anomalous tokenomics, and a near-total price collapse makes this a very high risk asset consistent with pump-and-dump activity. Only the most risk-tolerant, experienced traders with strict position sizing and stop-loss discipline should consider any exposure, and only with capital they can afford to lose entirely.

CUPSEY (The First Trencher) presents a profile overwhelmingly consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme. The token was dormant for 30 days with exactly 26 holders, then experienced a coordinated pump with +1,674 holders and a 448% price spike in a single hour, followed by a near-total price collapse. Sell pressure is 75.1%, sellers outnumber buyers 5:1, metadata is mutable with unknown authority, and no top holder data is available. There is no identifiable utility, community, or fundamental value proposition.

Bull case (low)

A second coordinated pump wave attracts new retail buyers, temporarily pushing price back toward the $0.00218 ATH. Viral social media attention could drive short-term speculative inflows.

  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • New coordinated social media campaign
  • Viral attention from the 'trencher' meme narrative
  • Low absolute price ($0.00148) attracting lottery-ticket buyers

Base case

The token stabilizes at a fraction of its pump high, trading in a low-liquidity range between $0.0000313 and $0.00148 with declining volume and holder attrition as speculators exit.

  • No new coordinated pump occurs
  • Liquidity pool remains intact
  • Creator does not execute a rug pull via metadata mutation
  • Some residual speculative interest maintains minimal trading activity

Bear case (high)

The pump fully unwinds, price returns to the near-zero floor (~$0.0000313) or lower as remaining holders exit. Liquidity drains, the token becomes untradeable, and the project is abandoned.

  • Overwhelming sell pressure (75.1%) continues
  • Artificial holder base provides no organic buying support
  • Mutable metadata enables rug pull by creator
  • No utility, community, or development activity evident
  • Shallow liquidity cannot absorb continued selling

GeneratedJun 28, 05:16 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-06-28T17:00 UTC. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, limiting technical analysis depth. Historical holder data covers May 29 – June 27, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (mint, decimals, supply, authority)
  • Price feed (USD spot price, 24h change)
  • OHLC candle data (hourly, 2 candles)
  • Trading analytics (volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics (total, acquisition method, distribution tiers)
  • Historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Top holder data (unavailable — no data returned)
  • Sniper analysis (unavailable — no data returned)

Limitations

  • Only 2 OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely limited
  • No top holder data returned — whale/concentration analysis impossible
  • No sniper data available — smart money analysis relies on indirect signals only
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is anomalous and may indicate a data error
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
  • Price % change shown as 0% across all timeframes despite extreme volatility — possible data feed issue
  • Holder distribution tiers all show 0 — possible data reporting failure
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($0.00) and trading analytics ($1.25M)

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in newly launched meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The data analyzed shows multiple red flags consistent with pump-and-dump activity. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Always conduct your own research.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (with 0 decimals — highly anomalous; likely a data error or intentional obfuscation)

Key Risks

•Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — creator can modify token properties
•Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is a major data anomaly suggesting possible obfuscation
•Holder count frozen at exactly 26 for 30 days then +1,674 in 1 hour — strongly artificial
•75.1% sell pressure with sellers outnumbering buyers 5:1 by unique wallet count

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. The broader trading data, however, shows overwhelming sell pressure (75.1%, 4,340 sells vs 1,191 buys) and a near-total price collapse in the most recent candle, suggesting that early buyers who caught the pump are actively distributing. The ratio of 1,338 unique sellers to only 278 unique buyers in 24h strongly implies distribution by early entrants.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results.

Likely distributing — the 4,340 sells vs 1,191 buys and 1,338 unique sellers vs 278 unique buyers indicate early buyers are exiting aggressively. The intra-candle collapse from $0.002178 to $0.0000313 in candle [1] confirms a rapid exit event.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for The First Trencher (CUPSEY)?

The most recent hourly candle (candle [1]) opened at ~$0.00110, spiked to a high of ~$0.00218, then collapsed to a close of ~$0.0000313 — a ~97% intra-candle crash. The current reported price of ~$0.00148 appears to be a partial recovery or data lag. With 75.1% sell pressure, 4,340 sells vs 1,191 buys, and a near-zero recent close, the short-term outlook is strongly bearish. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000031 (recent candle low/close) to $0.00218 (recent candle high, unlikely to reclaim).

Is CUPSEY a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is unsuitable for virtually all investor profiles. The combination of artificial holder growth, extreme sell pressure, mutable/unknown authorities, anomalous tokenomics, and a near-total price collapse makes this a very high risk asset consistent with pump-and-dump activity. Only the most risk-tolerant, experienced traders with strict position sizing and stop-loss discipline should consider any exposure, and only with capital they can afford to lose entirely.

How are CUPSEY holders trending?

The First Trencher currently has 1,700 holders and is growing (24h: 1674, 7d: 1674, 30d: 1674). The historical holder data is a major red flag. For 30 consecutive days, the holder count was exactly 26 with zero net change. Then, in the 1-hour window coinciding with the price pump, 1,674 new holders appeared — representing 98% of the current 1,700 total. This pattern is inconsistent with organic adoption and is highly consistent with coordinated manipulation, airdrop farming, or bot activity designed to create the appearance of a growing community. The distribution data shows 0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, and 0 octopus — all zeroes — which is anomalous and may indicate a data reporting failure or that all holders hold negligible amounts.

What does sniper activity look like for CUPSEY?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding CUPSEY?

Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — creator can modify token properties • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is a major data anomaly suggesting possible obfuscation • Holder count frozen at exactly 26 for 30 days then +1,674 in 1 hour — strongly artificial

← Back to all predictions

Track CUPSEY