The Charging Bison Price Today & AI Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available, and they show prices in the $0.000027–$0.000048 range — dramatically lower than the reported current price of ~$0.000287. This suggests either significant data lag in the OHLC feed or an extreme intra-hour spike occurred after the last recorded candle. Within the available candles: Candle 3 (18:00) opened at $0.0000339, reached a high of $0.0000470, and closed at $0.0000470 — a bullish candle. Candle 2 (19:00) opened at $0.0000481, failed to make a new high (H=$0.0000481 = open), and closed lower at $0.0000339 — a bearish candle. Candle 1 (20:00) opened at $0.0000339, spiked to $0.0000481 high, but the L field ($0.000104) appears to be a data error (low > open/close is impossible). Volume increased from ~29K to ~61K in the most recent candle, suggesting accelerating activity. NOTE: The OHLC data appears to have a data quality issue (candle 1 low > high) and does not reflect the current price level — technical analysis from these candles alone is severely limited.

Short-term trend is technically upward given the 829% 24h price surge, but the token was completely flat (31 holders, no price movement) for the prior 30 days. The medium-term trend is effectively sideways-to-dormant with a single violent spike. The sustainability of this uptrend is highly questionable given sell pressure dominance.

Key Price Levels

Key levels are difficult to establish reliably due to the extreme price gap between OHLC candle data (~$0.000027–$0.000048) and the current reported price (~$0.000287). If the current price is accurate, the $0.000048 level (prior candle highs) represents a major support zone ~83% below current price, highlighting the extreme downside risk.

Holder growth is dramatic but highly suspicious. The token maintained exactly 31 holders with zero net change every single day from June 12 to July 11 (30 days of complete stagnation). Then within 24 hours, holders surged to 568 (+537, +95%). Within just the last hour, +324 new holders joined (+57% of current total). This pattern is consistent with a viral pump event attracting FOMO buyers rather than genuine community development. Acquisition method is predominantly swap (558 of 568 holders), confirming these are active traders/speculators rather than airdrop recipients or organic transfers. The distribution data shows 0 whales, sharks, dolphins, fish, or octopus — and top 10/100 concentration at 0% — which appears to be a data anomaly rather than genuine equal distribution, as top holder data is entirely unavailable.

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token — the API returned no top 20 holders. The supply concentration metrics show 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which is almost certainly a data anomaly rather than genuine equal distribution (a token cannot have 0% concentration in its top holders). This is a significant red flag as it prevents any assessment of whale concentration, insider holdings, or potential dump risk from large holders. Given the token's PumpFun origin, mutable metadata, and unknown update authority, the inability to verify holder distribution substantially increases risk. The 'distribution health' is marked as very_concentrated as a conservative assessment given the data gap — the true distribution is unknown and potentially highly concentrated among the original 31 pre-pump holders.

Liquidity is critically shallow at only $57.86K on a single PumpSwap pair (EaCGx9Xioat9Ck8w7feotF4p1Jkge8CxyEcJqxHi7xvd). With a FDV of $286.77K, the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 20% — extremely low. Any sell order of meaningful size will cause severe price impact. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $86.71K in sells vs $41.06K in buys represents a net outflow of ~$45.65K. Sellers outnumber buyers 2.15:1 (723 sellers vs 339 buyers), and sell transactions outnumber buy transactions 2.15:1 (1,844 sells vs 858 buys). This is a clear distribution pattern where early holders are offloading to new FOMO buyers. The market health is poor despite the price surge — the price increase is being driven by thin liquidity amplifying small buy orders, not by genuine demand depth.

Tokenomics data contains significant anomalies. The total supply is reported as 1 with 0 decimals — this is almost certainly a metadata display issue rather than a literal single-token supply. The FDV of $286.77K at a price of $0.000287 implies a true supply of approximately 1 billion tokens, consistent with typical PumpFun launches. The contract is explicitly marked as unverified and mutable (Mutable: true), and the update authority is listed as 'unknown' — this means the token's metadata can be changed by whoever holds the update authority, which is a significant rug risk vector. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be determined from available data, so both are marked unknown. The combination of mutable metadata, unknown authority, unverified contract, and PumpFun origin places this token in the high rug-risk category. The 'pump' suffix in the mint address confirms PumpFun origin.

BISON is a PumpFun meme token experiencing a viral pump event after 30+ days of complete dormancy. The investment case is purely speculative momentum trading with extreme downside risk. The token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump: thin liquidity, unknown authorities, mutable contract, dominant sell pressure, and a sudden viral spike from a dormant base. Any investment thesis must be predicated on exiting before the inevitable retracement.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The data used contains acknowledged gaps and anomalies. Never invest more than you can afford to lose completely. This analysis does not recommend buying, selling, or holding any token.