Q

QuantumCoin Price Prediction 2026

Q
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 22, 2026

BCNSwbxk5q25UFU1oLYTd25MQVTq9NNPRHxoxjPgpump

$0.054132

+18.30%

FDV $3,367

LiveContract:BCNSwbxk5q25UFU1oLYTd25MQVTq9NNPRHxoxjPgpumpChain:SolanaHolders:248Market cap:$3,367

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Q

Report snapshotas of Jun 22, 04:17 PM
FDV

$95,305

Liquidity

$39,871

Holders

420

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

QuantumCoin (Q) is a Solana-based token (mint: BCNSwbxk5q25UFU1oLYTd25MQVTq9NNPRHxoxjPgpump) with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$95,305. The token was dormant for nearly a month with only 3 holders, then exploded to 420 holders in the last 24 hours alongside a 72% price spike. Trading activity is heavily sell-dominated (77.9% sell pressure, 8,731 sells vs 1,135 buys), liquidity is extremely shallow at $39.87K, and top holder data is unavailable. The description references a third-party deployment tool (j7tracker.io), the contract is unverified, and update authority is unknown — all significant red flags.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme dormancy followed by sudden 24h holder explosion (+417 holders, +99%) — highly anomalous
Overwhelming sell pressure: 77.9% sell volume ($209.99K sells vs $59.48K buys) in 24h
Extremely shallow liquidity at $39.87K against $88.27K FDV — high slippage risk
Token was deployed via third-party tool j7tracker.io with unverified contract and unknown update authority
No top holder data available, supply concentration metrics show 0% for top 10 and top 100 — data gap raises transparency concerns

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token surged ~145.9% in the last hour and 72% over 24h, but sell pressure is overwhelming at 77.9% of volume. The most recent candle (16:00 UTC) shows a high of $0.0001208 and a close of $0.0000953, well below the wick high, indicating sellers absorbed the pump. With 8,731 sells vs 1,135 buys and only $39.87K in liquidity, further downside is likely in the near term.

Target low$0.000022
Target high$0.000120
Support: $0.0000770 (candle [1] low), $0.0000222 (candle [2] low — recent floor)
Resistance: $0.0001034 (candle [2] high), $0.0001208 (candle [1] all-time high in data)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

The token spent 30 days with only 3 holders before a sudden spike. This pattern is consistent with coordinated pump activity. Without genuine organic adoption, sustained utility, or meaningful liquidity, the medium-term outlook is bearish. The FDV of ~$95K is fragile given the shallow liquidity base.

Catalysts
  • Any genuine exchange listing or partnership announcement
  • Significant liquidity injection above $500K
  • Organic community growth beyond the current 420 holders

Bullish factors

  • Price up 72.17% in 24h and 145.9% in 1h — strong short-term momentum
  • Holder count grew from 3 to 420 in 24h (+417, +99%) — rapid adoption signal (though suspicious)
  • 5-minute price change of +10.84% suggests continued short-term buying interest

Bearish factors

  • 77.9% sell pressure ($209.99K sells vs $59.48K buys) — sellers dominating
  • 8,731 sells vs 1,135 buys — sell transactions outnumber buys 7.7:1
  • Liquidity of only $39.87K is extremely shallow relative to trading volume
  • 30 days of complete dormancy (3 holders, zero change) before sudden spike is a classic pump signal
  • Unverified contract, unknown update authority, deployed via third-party tool
  • No top holder transparency — supply concentration data unavailable
  • 6h and 24h price change both show 0% in analytics (data inconsistency raises questions)
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: missing top holder data, unknown update authority, no sniper data, only 2 OHLC candles available, and highly anomalous on-chain behavior (30-day dormancy followed by sudden spike). The data is insufficient to make reliable price projections.

Q call history

Full track record →
Jun 22bearish
24h-46.4%
7d-93.6%
30d-95.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available. Candle [2] (15:00 UTC): O=$0.0000306, H=$0.0001033, L=$0.0000222, C=$0.0000811 — a massive bullish candle with a long upper wick, indicating strong buying followed by partial profit-taking. Candle [1] (16:00 UTC): O=$0.0000822, H=$0.0001208, L=$0.0000770, C=$0.0000953 — price opened near candle [2]'s close, pushed to a new high of $0.0001208, but closed well below the high, forming a shooting star / bearish wick pattern. This suggests distribution at the top.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 22%Sell 78%

Short-term trend is technically upward given the 72% 24h gain and higher close in candle [1] vs candle [2]. However, the medium-term picture is sideways-to-bearish: the token was flat for 30 days at near-zero activity, and the current spike has characteristics of a pump rather than sustained trend establishment.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000770 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.0000222 (candle [2] low — recent absolute floor)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0001034 (candle [2] high)
Major$0.0001208 (candle [1] high — recent peak)

The $0.0000770 level acted as intra-hour support in candle [1]. A break below this opens a path to the candle [2] low of $0.0000222. On the upside, $0.0001034 and $0.0001208 are the key resistance levels from the two available candles. Given the shooting-star formation at $0.0001208, this level is likely to cap near-term upside.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish upper wick on candle [1] at $0.0001208 high — distribution signal
  • Massive volume spike in candle [2] ($210K) followed by 83.6% volume collapse in candle [1] — bearish volume divergence
  • Price opened candle [1] near candle [2] close, suggesting continuation attempt that stalled
  • 30-day flat base followed by vertical price spike — classic pump-and-dump pattern structure

Total holders420
24h Δ+417
7d Δ+417
30d Δ+417
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder explosion from 3 to 420 (+417, +99%) occurred simultaneously with the 72% price pump in the last 24 hours. This tight correlation between holder growth and price spike is consistent with a coordinated pump event rather than organic adoption. The token had exactly 3 holders for the entire 30-day historical period (May 23 – June 21, 2026) with zero net change each day, then suddenly gained 417 holders in a single day.

Holder growth is technically accelerating — from 0 new holders per day for 30 consecutive days to +417 in a single 24-hour window. However, this pattern is a major red flag rather than a bullish signal. A 30-day dormancy period with only 3 holders followed by a sudden mass-holder event is a hallmark of coordinated pump activity. The acquisition method shows 416 of 420 holders acquired via swap (99%), with only 4 via transfer and 0 via airdrop. Distribution data shows 0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, and 0 octopus — and top 10/top 100 concentration is reported as 0%, which is a data anomaly likely reflecting incomplete indexing rather than genuine equal distribution.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available — the top holders endpoint returned no results for this token

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for QuantumCoin (Q). The reported top 10 and top 100 concentration of 0% is almost certainly a data indexing gap rather than a genuine reflection of equal distribution — a token with 420 holders and $39.87K liquidity is unlikely to have perfectly equal supply distribution. The absence of this data is itself a transparency concern. Given the 30-day dormancy with only 3 holders, it is highly probable that the original 3 holders control a significant portion of supply, but this cannot be confirmed from available data. Distribution health is classified as 'very_concentrated' based on the known history of 3 founding holders and the lack of any contrary evidence.

Liquidity$39,870
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$59,480
Sell$209,990
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers421
Unique sellers1,499

Liquidity is critically shallow at $39.87K on PumpSwap (pair: 6iVfdmevfeZqDbzJ9p26fZkcKHFazhWpX). The FDV of $88.27K–$95.3K is more than double the available liquidity, meaning any meaningful sell order will cause severe slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $209.99K in sell volume vs $59.48K in buy volume — a net outflow of approximately $150.5K. Unique sellers (1,499) vastly outnumber unique buyers (421), and total sell transactions (8,731) dwarf buys (1,135) by a 7.7:1 ratio. This is a deeply unhealthy market structure indicative of active distribution. The volume-to-liquidity ratio is extreme: 24h total volume (~$269K) is approximately 6.75x the total liquidity pool, suggesting the pool is being churned rapidly and is at high risk of depletion.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000 Q
FDV$95,305.02

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

QuantumCoin has a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens with an FDV of ~$95,305 at the current price of $0.0000953. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the token is marked as 'mutable: false' — the immutability flag is a mild positive, but without confirmed authority renouncement, rug risk from authorities cannot be assessed. The contract is unverified (verified: false), which is a significant concern. The token was deployed via https://j7tracker.io, a third-party deployment tool, which reduces transparency about the deployment process and initial token distribution. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown from available data. The 'possible spam' flag is false, but the unverified contract and third-party deployment tool warrant caution. The combination of unknown authorities, unverified contract, and anomalous holder behavior elevates tokenomic risk substantially.

Volatility
high

Price surged 145.9% in 1 hour and 72.17% in 24h. Only 2 OHLC candles available, both showing extreme intraday ranges. The token is capable of violent moves in both directions given its micro-cap status and shallow liquidity.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $39.87K on PumpSwap. The 24h trading volume of ~$269K is 6.75x the liquidity pool. Any significant sell order will cause severe slippage. Exiting a meaningful position at current prices would be extremely difficult.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is unavailable, but the token had only 3 holders for 30 consecutive days before the pump. These founding holders likely control a large but unquantifiable portion of supply. The reported 0% top-10 concentration is a data gap, not evidence of healthy distribution.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available. However, the 30-day dormancy with 3 holders followed by a sudden pump, combined with 77.9% sell pressure and 8,731 sell transactions, strongly suggests early holders are actively dumping into retail demand.

Authority
high

Update authority is 'unknown'. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The contract is unverified. The token was deployed via a third-party tool (j7tracker.io). These factors make it impossible to rule out rug pull capability by the deployer.

Key risks

  • Unknown mint/freeze/update authority — rug pull risk cannot be excluded
  • Unverified contract deployed via third-party tool (j7tracker.io)
  • 30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern
  • Overwhelming sell pressure: 77.9% of 24h volume is sells, 8,731 sells vs 1,135 buys
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($39.87K) with high slippage risk on any meaningful trade
  • No top holder transparency — founding 3 holders may control majority of supply
  • Volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~6.75x indicates pool stress and potential for rapid price collapse
  • Holder explosion from 3 to 420 in 24h is anomalous and consistent with coordinated activity

Mitigating factors

  • Token is marked as mutable: false, providing some protection against metadata changes
  • No spam flag from the data provider
  • Social links (Twitter, Moralis) exist, suggesting some public presence
  • Price has shown genuine upward momentum in the short term (72% 24h gain)
  • 416 of 420 holders acquired via swap, suggesting real on-chain transactions rather than pure airdrops
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap, low-liquidity Solana tokens and can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than a negligible speculative allocation. The risk profile is consistent with a potential pump-and-dump scheme.

QuantumCoin (Q) presents an extremely high-risk speculative profile. The token was dormant for 30 days with 3 holders, then experienced a coordinated-looking pump with 420 holders and a 72% price spike in 24 hours. Sell pressure dominates at 77.9%, liquidity is critically shallow, and key transparency data (top holders, authority status) is missing. The risk/reward is highly unfavorable for new entrants at current prices.

Bull case (low)

Short-term momentum continuation: If the 10.84% 5-minute price gain and 1-hour surge attract additional retail FOMO buyers, price could test the $0.0001208 resistance level again. A genuine community forms around the token and liquidity deepens organically.

  • Continued short-term buying momentum (5m: +10.84%)
  • Rapid holder growth attracting further attention
  • Potential viral social media activity via Twitter presence
  • Low absolute price ($0.0000953) attracting lottery-ticket buyers

Base case

Gradual price decay with high volatility: The initial pump fades as sell pressure continues to dominate. Price stabilizes somewhere between $0.0000400–$0.0000700 as momentum buyers and sellers reach equilibrium. Token remains a low-liquidity micro-cap with limited organic utility.

  • Sell pressure moderates but remains dominant
  • No additional coordinated buying campaigns
  • Liquidity pool remains intact at ~$39.87K
  • No rug pull event from unknown authorities
  • Holder count stabilizes around 300–500 as some early buyers exit

Bear case (high)

Pump-and-dump collapse: The founding 3 holders (who controlled 100% of supply for 30 days) dump remaining holdings into the current retail wave. Price collapses back toward the candle [2] low of $0.0000222 or lower as liquidity is exhausted. Token becomes illiquid and abandoned.

  • 77.9% sell pressure with 8,731 sell transactions already executed
  • Unknown authorities enabling potential rug pull
  • Critically shallow $39.87K liquidity unable to absorb continued selling
  • Historical pattern of 30-day dormancy is consistent with pre-pump accumulation by insiders
  • Volume declining 83.6% from candle [2] to candle [1] — pump losing steam

GeneratedJun 22, 04:17 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of 2026-06-22T16:xx UTC. OHLC data covers only the most recent 2 hourly candles. Historical holder data covers 30 days ending June 21, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (mint: BCNSwbxk5q25UFU1oLYTd25MQVTq9NNPRHxoxjPgpump)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (6iVfdmevfeZqDbzJ9p26fZkcKHFazhWpX)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles, 2026-06-22 15:00–16:00 UTC)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Historical holder data (30-day daily series, May 23 – June 22, 2026)
  • Holder acquisition and distribution metrics
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top holder data entirely unavailable — cannot assess supply concentration
  • Sniper data unavailable — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
  • Update, mint, and freeze authority status are unknown — rug risk unquantifiable
  • Supply concentration metrics report 0% for top 10 and top 100, which is likely a data indexing gap
  • 6h and 24h price change both show 0% in analytics despite clear price movement — possible data inconsistency
  • Token is very new with limited on-chain history
  • Third-party deployment tool (j7tracker.io) reduces deployment transparency

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens on Solana, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data used is sourced from on-chain metrics and third-party providers and may contain errors or gaps. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decision. The analyst and this platform bear no responsibility for any financial losses incurred.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000 Q

Key Risks

Unknown mint/freeze/update authority — rug pull risk cannot be excluded
Unverified contract deployed via third-party tool (j7tracker.io)
30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern
Overwhelming sell pressure: 77.9% of 24h volume is sells, 8,731 sells vs 1,135 buys

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for QuantumCoin (Q). As per methodology, sniperConcentrationPercent is set to 0 and related fields are marked unknown. The absence of sniper data, combined with the token's 30-day dormancy and sudden holder explosion, makes it impossible to assess early buyer behavior with confidence. The overwhelming sell pressure (77.9% of 24h volume) and 8,731 sell transactions vs 1,135 buys suggest that whoever accumulated early is actively distributing.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — the sniper analysis endpoint returned no results for this token.

Unknown — no sniper data available. However, the extreme sell-to-buy transaction ratio (7.7:1) and 77.9% sell volume dominance strongly imply early holders or insiders are distributing into retail buying interest.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for QuantumCoin (Q)?

The token surged ~145.9% in the last hour and 72% over 24h, but sell pressure is overwhelming at 77.9% of volume. The most recent candle (16:00 UTC) shows a high of $0.0001208 and a close of $0.0000953, well below the wick high, indicating sellers absorbed the pump. With 8,731 sells vs 1,135 buys and only $39.87K in liquidity, further downside is likely in the near term. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000022 to $0.000120.

Is Q a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap, low-liquidity Solana tokens and can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than a negligible speculative allocation. The risk profile is consistent with a potential pump-and-dump scheme.

How are Q holders trending?

QuantumCoin currently has 420 holders and is growing (24h: 417, 7d: 417, 30d: 417). Holder growth is technically accelerating — from 0 new holders per day for 30 consecutive days to +417 in a single 24-hour window. However, this pattern is a major red flag rather than a bullish signal. A 30-day dormancy period with only 3 holders followed by a sudden mass-holder event is a hallmark of coordinated pump activity. The acquisition method shows 416 of 420 holders acquired via swap (99%), with only 4 via transfer and 0 via airdrop. Distribution data shows 0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, and 0 octopus — and top 10/top 100 concentration is reported as 0%, which is a data anomaly likely reflecting incomplete indexing rather than genuine equal distribution.

What does sniper activity look like for Q?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding Q?

Unknown mint/freeze/update authority — rug pull risk cannot be excluded • Unverified contract deployed via third-party tool (j7tracker.io) • 30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern

Track Q