Grindfun Price Today & AI Analysis

GRINDFUNSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 14, 2026

$0.0₅4602

-1.66% 24h

Contract

Live

B3SUGXHxn4aEfHzT6nLpzrRKTUmCjA4AsDeHUgCEpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

123

Market cap

$4,599

At a $1M market cap, $GRINDFUN would be $0.001001 (217x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is GRINDFUN a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 24

Watch insiders

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 20% of the supply.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

20%1 sniper, 10 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about GRINDFUN

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

LihLih$0.0₅2433+0.0%MC $2.3K

1jimothy1 jimothy can change your life$0.0₅2964+0.0%MC $3.0K

ALLOXAlloX$0.0₅6068-52.4%MC $606.8K

CPUCompute Network$0.0₅4096+0.0%MC $4.1K

RATWIFratwifhat$0.0₅2555+0.0%MC $2.6K

ZECZcash$1,295.95+6.3%MC $133.22M

Grindfun: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-14 13:49 UTC

Holder addresses

353

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$30,638.60

How concentrated is Grindfun ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 353 addresses (2026-06-14 13:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Grindfun?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Grindfun liquidity falling?: As of 2026-06-14 13:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $30,638.60. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-14 13:49 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 14, 01:49 PM UTC

FDV

$43,207

Liquidity

$30,638.60

Holders

353

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

GRINDFUN (Grindfun) is a micro-cap Solana meme/gaming token (mint: B3SUGXHxn4aEfHzT6nLpzrRKTUmCjA4AsDeHUgCEpump) with a fully diluted valuation of ~$43.2K and total liquidity of ~$30.6K. The token launched on PumpSwap and experienced a sharp intraday pump-and-dump pattern on June 14, 2026 — spiking from ~$0.000032 to a high of ~$0.000092 before retracing to ~$0.000043. Holder count exploded from 48 (static for 30 days) to 353 within a single 24-hour window, a highly anomalous pattern. Sell pressure dominates at 81.6% of 24h volume. The token is extremely high risk.

Key points

Described as a browser-based 3D mining game on Solana — utility claim unverified on-chain
Holder count was completely flat at 48 for 30 days then surged +305 in 24h — suggests coordinated launch event
Top 10 holders control 52.53% of supply; top 100 control 91.94%
81.6% sell pressure vs 18.4% buy pressure in 24h despite 37.6% price gain — divergence signals distribution
Liquidity ($30.6K) is dangerously thin relative to FDV ($43.2K)

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

Price has already retraced ~53% from its intraday high of ~$0.0000918 to the current ~$0.0000432. The 6h change is -34.8%, confirming a sharp downtrend. With 81.6% sell pressure, thin liquidity of $30.6K, and a heavily concentrated holder base, further downside is likely in the near term. The 1h change of -2.8% and 5m of +1.3% suggest a brief dead-cat bounce is possible but the dominant trend is bearish.

Target low

$0.000029

Target high

$0.000055

Support: $0.000042 (current close / recent low cluster), $0.000031 (candle 14 open/close, prior base), $0.000028 (candle 13 low — absolute recent low)
Resistance: $0.000055 (candle 3 open, candle 11 close area), $0.000069 (candle 4 open, candle 5 close), $0.000092 (candle 9 high — intraday peak)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

The token was dormant for 30 days with only 48 holders before a single-day surge. Without sustained organic demand, game utility validation, or new catalysts, the token is likely to drift back toward its pre-pump base or lower. The extremely thin liquidity pool means any moderate sell order can move price significantly downward.

Catalysts

Verified game launch or playable product release could attract genuine users
Broader Solana meme/gaming sector rally
Exchange listing or partnership announcement
Sustained holder growth beyond the initial 24h spike

Bullish factors

24h price is +37.6% despite heavy sell pressure, showing some demand absorption
Unique buyer count (16,193) far exceeds unique sellers (4,164), suggesting broad retail interest
Gaming/utility narrative may attract niche community
Social links present (Telegram, Twitter, website) indicating some project infrastructure

Bearish factors

81.6% sell pressure ($235K sell vs $52.9K buy volume in 24h)
Price down -34.8% in 6h — sharp post-pump retracement underway
Top 10 holders control 52.53% of supply — extreme concentration
Holder count was 0 growth for 30 days before a single-day spike — artificial or coordinated
Liquidity of $30.6K is dangerously shallow; large slippage risk
Unverified contract, unknown update authority
FDV ($43.2K) barely exceeds liquidity ($30.6K) — near-zero premium

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the token's extremely short active trading history (effectively 1 day of real activity), absence of sniper data, unknown update authority, and the highly anomalous holder pattern. Price action is driven by speculation rather than fundamentals.

GRINDFUN call history

Full track record →

Jun 14bearish@ $0.0000432

24h-90.5%

7d-92.0%

30d-91.9%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: B3SUGX...pump
Total Supply: 999,553,186.93

Key Risks

Extreme supply concentration — top 10 hold 52.53%, creating dump risk
Critically shallow liquidity ($30.6K) with high slippage on any meaningful exit
Anomalous holder pattern (48 static for 30 days, +305 in 1 day) suggests coordinated pump
81.6% sell pressure in 24h — active distribution by large holders into retail

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

14 hourly candles analyzed (June 14, 2026 00:00–13:00 UTC). The token opened the day at ~$0.0000322 (candle 14), then staged a dramatic rally through candles 13–9, reaching an intraday high of ~$0.0000918 (candle 9, 05:00 UTC) — a ~185% move from open. From that peak, price has been in a consistent downtrend through candles 8–1, closing the most recent candle at ~$0.0000432. Candle 9 shows a massive upper wick (open $0.0000549, high $0.0000906, close $0.0000824) — a classic shooting-star/topping pattern. Candle 8 (06:00) also shows a large upper wick (high $0.0000919, close $0.0000756). Candle 4 (10:00) is a large bearish candle: open $0.0000690, close $0.0000445, with high = open — a bearish engulfing/marubozu top. Candle 1 (13:00, most recent) shows a wide-range bearish candle: open $0.0000485, low $0.0000396, close $0.0000432 — continued selling.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

After a sharp intraday pump from $0.0000314 to $0.0000918 (candles 14–9), the token has been in a clear downtrend for the last 8 candles, making lower highs and lower lows. The medium-term trend is also bearish given the 30-day dormancy followed by a single-day spike and immediate retracement.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

18%

Sell

82%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000042 (recent close cluster, candle 1 close)

Major support

$0.000028 (candle 13 absolute low — lowest point in the 14-candle series)

Immediate resistance

$0.000055 (candle 11 close / candle 3 open area)

Major resistance

$0.000092 (candle 9 high — intraday peak, likely strong overhead resistance)

The $0.000042 level is acting as near-term support (current price). A break below $0.000040 (candle 1 low: $0.0000396) opens the path to $0.000031–$0.000028 (the pre-pump base). Overhead, $0.000055 is the first meaningful resistance, with the intraday high of $0.000092 representing a major ceiling that would require significant new buying to reclaim.

Notable patterns

Shooting star / topping candle at candle 9 (05:00 UTC) — high wick, close well below high
Bearish engulfing at candle 4 (10:00 UTC) — open equals high, sharp close lower
Volume climax at candles 11–13 followed by volume collapse — classic pump-and-dump signature
Lower highs and lower lows from candle 8 onward — confirmed downtrend structure
Dead-cat bounce potential at current $0.000042 support given +1.3% 5m tick

Liquidity

$30,638.60

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $30.6K — less than the FDV of $43.2K. This means any moderately sized sell order will cause severe slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $235K in sell volume vs $52.9K in buy volume represents a net outflow of ~$182K. Despite 16,193 unique buyers vs only 4,164 unique sellers, the sell volume is 4.4x the buy volume, indicating that sellers are transacting in much larger average sizes — consistent with whale distribution into retail. The buy/sell transaction count ratio (17,244 buys vs 7,250 sells) further confirms many small retail buyers are absorbing a smaller number of large sell orders. Market health is poor: shallow liquidity, dominant sell pressure, and a post-pump price trajectory all signal deteriorating conditions.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,553,186.93

FDV

$43,206.67

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved +185% intraday then retraced -53% within hours. 6h change is -34.8%. Extreme volatility typical of micro-cap pump-and-dump dynamics.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $30.6K — less than the FDV. Any sell order above a few hundred dollars will incur significant slippage. Exit risk is very high for any position of meaningful size.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme supply concentration — top 10 hold 52.53%, creating dump risk
Critically shallow liquidity ($30.6K) with high slippage on any meaningful exit
Anomalous holder pattern (48 static for 30 days, +305 in 1 day) suggests coordinated pump
81.6% sell pressure in 24h — active distribution by large holders into retail
Unverified contract and unknown authority status
No sniper data available — early holder behavior cannot be fully assessed
Micro-cap FDV ($43.2K) with no verified on-chain utility

Mitigating factors

Token is marked mutable:false — metadata cannot be changed
Social presence exists (Telegram, Twitter, website) — some project infrastructure
Unique buyer count (16,193) shows broad retail interest, providing some demand base
Gaming/utility narrative (browser mining game) could attract niche community if product is real
PumpSwap listing provides some baseline liquidity infrastructure

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

GRINDFUN is a high-risk micro-cap Solana token that experienced a single-day pump-and-dump pattern on June 14, 2026. The token was dormant for 30 days before a coordinated price spike attracted 305 new retail holders in 24 hours. Dominant sell pressure, extreme supply concentration, and critically thin liquidity make this a speculative instrument with very high loss probability. The gaming utility narrative is unverified on-chain.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The GrindFun browser mining game launches with a functional, engaging product that drives genuine user acquisition. The community grows organically, liquidity deepens, and the token finds utility as an in-game reward mechanism. A broader Solana gaming sector rally amplifies gains.

Verified, playable game product with real user engagement
Sustained organic holder growth beyond the initial 24h spike
Liquidity pool deepening through LP incentives or protocol growth
Positive Solana ecosystem sentiment and gaming sector momentum

Base Case

Price stabilizes in the $0.000030–$0.000045 range as the initial pump fully unwinds. A small community of 300–500 holders remains. The project makes occasional social media updates but fails to achieve significant traction. Token trades at low volumes with periodic volatility spikes.

Some retail holders remain engaged with the gaming narrative
No major new catalyst in the next 30 days
Liquidity remains thin but stable around current levels
Early insiders have largely completed distribution

Bear Case

High probability

The initial pump was entirely coordinated by insiders who have now largely distributed their holdings. Retail buyers are left holding a depreciating asset with no liquidity to exit. The token drifts back to pre-pump levels (~$0.000031) or lower, and the project goes dormant again.

Continued dominant sell pressure from concentrated early holders
No new catalysts or product delivery to sustain demand
Thin liquidity accelerating price decline on any selling
Retail FOMO buyers exiting as losses mount

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 14, 01:49 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-14 13:49 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (mint, decimals, supply, mutability)
PumpSwap price feed (USD and WSOL pair)
14 hourly OHLC candles (June 14, 2026 00:00–13:00 UTC)
24h trading analytics (volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and distribution data
Top 20 holder addresses and balances
30-day historical holder series (daily)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Sniper data unavailable — early buyer behavior inferred from holder/volume patterns only
Update authority status is 'unknown' — mint and freeze authority cannot be confirmed
Contract is unverified — smart contract risk cannot be fully assessed
Only 14 hours of active trading history available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
Holder classification is inferred from address patterns and context, not verified labels
Gaming utility claim (browser mining game) is unverified on-chain — description is from token creator and may be misleading
30-day holder history shows only 48 holders until June 14 — limited baseline for trend analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed comes from on-chain sources and third-party APIs which may contain errors or be manipulated. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Grindfun (GRINDFUN) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 20% of the supply. Checked Oct 24, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Grindfun (GRINDFUN)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 24, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Grindfun ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 353 addresses (2026-06-14 13:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Grindfun?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Grindfun liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-14 13:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $30,638.60. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Grindfun (GRINDFUN)?

Is GRINDFUN a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

What are the key risks of holding GRINDFUN?

Extreme supply concentration — top 10 hold 52.53%, creating dump risk • Critically shallow liquidity ($30.6K) with high slippage on any meaningful exit • Anomalous holder pattern (48 static for 30 days, +305 in 1 day) suggests coordinated pump