RATWIF

ratwifhat Price Today & AI Analysis

RATWIFSolanaAnalysis as of May 7, 2026

Price

$0.052152

FDV $2,151

Contract

Live
B4eAiVxxWMkBUrTkVNGMjqeHPcbqtpzfK52d3NAWpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

60

Market cap

$2,151

More tokens on Solana

LihLihLih$0.052677-0.7%MC $2.6K1jimothy1jimothy1 jimothy can change your life$0.052988+0.0%MC $3.0KPACPACPhotorealistic Autism Creature$0.051989+0.0%MC $2.0KDIAMONDDIAMONDDIAMOND HANDS$0.000103+0.0%MC $103.3KJINQIANJINQIANMoney Mushroom$0.047227+0.0%MC $691.5KSTONKSTONKSTONK$0.3161-4.3%MC $260.36M

ratwifhat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-07 20:48 UTC

Holder addresses

130

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

Not available
How concentrated is ratwifhat ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 130 addresses (2026-05-07 20:48 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling ratwifhat?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is ratwifhat liquidity falling?
Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-07 20:48 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about RATWIF

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of May 7, 08:48 PM UTC

FDV

$0

Liquidity

Not available

Holders

130

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

ratwifhat (RATWIF) is a meme token on Solana launched via PumpFun/PumpSwap (mint: B4eAiVxxWMkBUrTkVNGMjqeHPcbqtpzfK52d3NAWpump). The token has experienced a catastrophic 96.38% price collapse within 24 hours, dropping from ~$0.000114 to ~$0.00000286. With only 130 holders, $0 reported liquidity, extreme supply concentration (top 10 wallets hold 97.09% of supply), and an unverified, mutable contract with unknown update authority, RATWIF presents an extremely high-risk profile consistent with a classic pump-and-dump meme token.

Key points

  • Catastrophic 24h price crash of -96.38%, suggesting a completed pump-and-dump cycle
  • Extreme supply concentration: top 10 holders control 97.09% of total supply
  • Reported total liquidity of $0.00 on PumpSwap, making exit nearly impossible
  • Only 130 total holders with the token dormant for ~30 days before a sudden 24h spike
  • 20 identified snipers, majority in profit, indicating coordinated early accumulation

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24–72 hours

bearish

The token has already crashed 96.38% in 24 hours. The most recent hourly candle (20:00 UTC) shows a massive wick from a high of $0.000203 down to a close of $0.00000286, confirming a completed dump. With $0 reported liquidity and sell pressure at 51.4%, further downside or complete abandonment is the most likely near-term outcome. A brief 15% bounce was observed in the last 5 minutes, but this is likely noise in an illiquid market.

Target low

$0.000000500

Target high

$0.000010000

Support

$0.000002234 (hourly candle low, 20:00 UTC), $0.000000500 (estimated floor given near-zero liquidity)

Resistance

$0.000037841 (prior candle open, 19:00 UTC), $0.000116376 (prior candle close, 19:00 UTC), $0.000203303 (hourly high, 20:00 UTC — peak of pump)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Given the token's history of 30 days of complete stagnation at 53 holders before a single-day spike, and the subsequent crash, medium-term recovery is highly unlikely without a new coordinated pump. The mutable contract and unknown authority add further uncertainty. Holders who did not exit during the pump are likely trapped with minimal liquidity to sell into.

Catalysts

  • A new coordinated social media campaign (Telegram mentioned in socials)
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all tokens
  • Whale accumulation at depressed prices (speculative)

Bullish factors

  • Brief 5-minute price bounce of +15% suggests some residual buying interest
  • 24h buyer count (2,433) exceeds seller count (2,026), though sell volume is slightly higher
  • 20 snipers still holding partial positions may provide a price floor

Bearish factors

  • 96.38% price crash in 24 hours — classic pump-and-dump signature
  • Total reported liquidity is $0.00, making meaningful price recovery structurally impossible without new capital
  • Top 10 holders control 97.09% of supply — any sell decision by a whale is catastrophic
  • Token was dormant for 30+ days (53 holders, zero change) before the pump event
  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — rug risk remains elevated
  • Sell volume ($597.9K) slightly exceeds buy volume ($564.25K) over 24h

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) $0 reported liquidity making price discovery unreliable, (2) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available for technical analysis, (3) the token appears to be in a post-pump collapse phase where price action is driven by thin order books and a handful of large holders, not organic market forces.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
B4eAiV...pump
Total Supply
1 (with 0 decimals — note: holder balances in the quadrillions suggest the formatted supply of '1' is misleading; the raw on-chain supply appears to be in the hundreds of quadrillions based on holder balances, e.g. top holder balance: 807,110,226,859,003)

Key Risks

  • Complete loss of capital — token has already crashed 96.38% and liquidity is reported at $0
  • Whale/team dump risk: wallets CS8wTpBmLpH95VnPCMP2JbeV31voYYGSQkWyXa99et1U (7.91%) and BM9CcyErJcu2mjrFvUsRRrD3snGeHDDVirJLvL6EjvMN (5.02%) hold large concentrated positions
  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — potential for metadata manipulation or rug
  • Zero liquidity makes exit impossible for any meaningful position size

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available. Candle [2] (19:00 UTC): O=$0.0000378, H=$0.0001492, L=$0.0000378, C=$0.0001164 — a strong bullish candle with a long upper wick, suggesting the pump was already losing momentum. Candle [1] (20:00 UTC): O=$0.0001134, H=$0.0002033, L=$0.0000022, C=$0.0000029 — a massive bearish engulfing/crash candle. The open was near the prior close, price briefly spiked to a new high of $0.000203 (the pump peak), then collapsed 98.6% from high to low within the same hour, closing near the absolute low. This is a textbook 'blow-off top' or 'rug candle' pattern.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Both available candles, when read together, show a completed pump-and-dump cycle. The medium-term trend is also bearish given 30 days of dormancy followed by a single-session spike and crash. No uptrend structure exists.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

49%

Sell

51%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000002234 (hourly candle low, 20:00 UTC)

Major support

$0.000000500 (estimated structural floor given near-zero liquidity)

Immediate resistance

$0.000037841 (prior candle open / 19:00 UTC open)

Major resistance

$0.000203303 (absolute pump high, 20:00 UTC candle high)

The only meaningful support is the recent candle low of $0.000002234. All former price levels from the pump phase now act as resistance. The pump high of $0.000203 is extremely unlikely to be revisited without a new coordinated campaign. The current price of ~$0.00000286 is just above the candle low, indicating the token is trading at the bottom of its recent range.

Notable patterns

  • Blow-off top / rug candle: massive upper wick followed by close near the absolute low in candle [1]
  • Bearish engulfing: candle [1] opens near candle [2]'s close and closes far below candle [2]'s open
  • No higher highs or higher lows — no uptrend structure present
  • Volume spike on crash candle consistent with coordinated dump execution

Liquidity

Liquidity

Not available

Depth

Not assessed

Slippage risk

Not assessed

Liquidity depth and slippage risk cannot be assessed without a liquidity observation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1 (with 0 decimals — note: holder balances in the quadrillions suggest the formatted supply of '1' is misleading; the raw on-chain supply appears to be in the hundreds of quadrillions based on holder balances, e.g. top holder balance: 807,110,226,859,003)

FDV

$0.00 (as reported; effectively near-zero given current price)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    96.38% price crash in 24 hours. The token moved from ~$0.000114 open to a high of $0.000203 and then collapsed to $0.00000286 — a 98.6% drop from peak within a single hourly candle. Extreme volatility is the defining characteristic of this token.

  • LiquidityNot assessed

    A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Complete loss of capital — token has already crashed 96.38% and liquidity is reported at $0
  • Whale/team dump risk: wallets CS8wTpBmLpH95VnPCMP2JbeV31voYYGSQkWyXa99et1U (7.91%) and BM9CcyErJcu2mjrFvUsRRrD3snGeHDDVirJLvL6EjvMN (5.02%) hold large concentrated positions
  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — potential for metadata manipulation or rug
  • Zero liquidity makes exit impossible for any meaningful position size
  • Token was dormant for 30+ days before pump — no organic community or utility
  • Sniper wallets continue to hold residual positions and may sell remaining bags

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buyer count (2,433) exceeds seller count (2,026), suggesting some residual demand
  • 20 snipers with mostly positive PnL have already sold significant portions, reducing future dump pressure from this cohort
  • PumpFun launch mechanism provides some initial structure (bonding curve)
  • Token is not flagged as spam by the data provider

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of any capital deployed. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for complete loss. Given the post-crash state and zero liquidity, even speculative entry carries extreme risk.

RATWIF is a classic PumpFun meme token that has completed a pump-and-dump cycle. The token launched, attracted sniper bots and early buyers, pumped aggressively within a short window, and then crashed 96.38% in 24 hours. With zero reported liquidity, 97.09% supply concentration in the top 10 wallets, a mutable unverified contract, and 30 days of prior dormancy, there is no credible fundamental investment thesis. Any remaining interest is purely speculative.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A new coordinated social media campaign (leveraging the Telegram community) drives a second pump wave, attracting fresh retail buyers and temporarily restoring price to the $0.000037–$0.000116 range (prior candle levels).

  • Renewed Telegram/social media promotion
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Low absolute price ($0.00000286) attracting lottery-ticket speculators
  • Residual sniper holders providing a price floor

Base Case

The token trades at near-zero prices ($0.000001–$0.000005) with minimal volume and sporadic micro-pumps driven by thin liquidity. It gradually fades into obscurity over the next 7–30 days as holders give up and the token becomes effectively dead.

  • No new coordinated promotion campaign
  • Remaining whale holders (CS8wTpBmLpH95VnPCMP2JbeV31voYYGSQkWyXa99et1U, BM9CcyErJcu2mjrFvUsRRrD3snGeHDDVirJLvL6EjvMN) do not aggressively dump remaining bags
  • Liquidity remains near zero
  • No new utility or partnership announcements

Bear Case

High probability

The token continues to bleed out with zero new buyers, liquidity remains at $0, and the price drifts to effectively zero as remaining holders abandon their positions. The mutable contract is exploited or the token is simply forgotten.

  • Zero reported liquidity makes recovery structurally impossible without new capital injection
  • 30-day dormancy pattern suggests no organic community — the pump was entirely coordinated
  • Mutable contract with unknown authority creates ongoing rug risk
  • Snipers and whales have already extracted value; no incentive to support price
  • 96.38% crash has likely destroyed retail confidence

Analysis details

Generated

May 7, 08:48 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-07 20:48 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint: B4eAiVxxWMkBUrTkVNGMjqeHPcbqtpzfK52d3NAWpump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (pair: 9StnmjdmuffkQtmPPSXzEwSmJ4Z9Z3N5LtUACKjtLAGE)
  • Hourly OHLC price data (2 candles, 2026-05-07 19:00–20:00 UTC)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30 days daily)
  • Top 20 holder distribution data
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may be a data lag or reporting artifact, but taken at face value
  • Sniper USD amounts sniped are 'unknown' — exact sniper concentration % cannot be precisely calculated
  • Total supply metadata ('1' with 0 decimals) contradicts raw holder balance data — supply figures are unreliable
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are all unknown — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
  • The -677 holder change in 1 hour is likely a data anomaly and has been noted but not used as a primary signal
  • No order book depth data available — slippage estimates are qualitative
  • Historical holder data only goes back 30 days and shows zero change for the entire period prior to the last 24 hours

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The analyst has no position in RATWIF. All data is sourced from the inputs provided and may contain errors or omissions. Do not make investment decisions based solely on this report.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is ratwifhat ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 130 addresses (2026-05-07 20:48 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling ratwifhat?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is ratwifhat liquidity falling?

Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for ratwifhat (RATWIF)?

The token has already crashed 96.38% in 24 hours. The most recent hourly candle (20:00 UTC) shows a massive wick from a high of $0.000203 down to a close of $0.00000286, confirming a completed dump. With $0 reported liquidity and sell pressure at 51.4%, further downside or complete abandonment is the most likely near-term outcome. A brief 15% bounce was observed in the last 5 minutes, but this is likely noise in an illiquid market. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000000500 to $0.000010000.

Is RATWIF a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.4/100. This token is suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of any capital deployed. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for complete loss. Given the post-crash state and zero liquidity, even speculative entry carries extreme risk.

What are the key risks of holding RATWIF?

Complete loss of capital — token has already crashed 96.38% and liquidity is reported at $0 • Whale/team dump risk: wallets CS8wTpBmLpH95VnPCMP2JbeV31voYYGSQkWyXa99et1U (7.91%) and BM9CcyErJcu2mjrFvUsRRrD3snGeHDDVirJLvL6EjvMN (5.02%) hold large concentrated positions • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — potential for metadata manipulation or rug

← Back to all predictions

Track RATWIF