RATWIF

ratwifhat Price Prediction 2026

RATWIF
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 7, 2026

B4eAiVxxWMkBUrTkVNGMjqeHPcbqtpzfK52d3NAWpump

$0.051593

FDV $1,593

LiveContract:B4eAiVxxWMkBUrTkVNGMjqeHPcbqtpzfK52d3NAWpumpChain:SolanaHolders:64Market cap:$1,593

More tokens on Solana

GRINDFUN

GRINDFUN

Grindfun

$0.0534872.0%
MC $3.5K
CPU

CPU

Compute Network

$0.0533180.0%
MC $3.3K
PAC

PAC

Photorealistic Autism Creature

$0.0513410.0%
MC $1.3K
CHRISTINA

CHRISTINA

The Time Traveller

$0.0515450.0%
MC $1.5K
KEY

KEY

Key

$0.0520250.0%
MC $2.0K
arc

arc

AI Rig Complex

$0.060614.9%
MC $60.63M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about RATWIF

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of May 7, 08:48 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$0

Holders

130

Snipers

39

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

ratwifhat (RATWIF) is a meme token on Solana launched via PumpFun/PumpSwap (mint: B4eAiVxxWMkBUrTkVNGMjqeHPcbqtpzfK52d3NAWpump). The token has experienced a catastrophic 96.38% price collapse within 24 hours, dropping from ~$0.000114 to ~$0.00000286. With only 130 holders, $0 reported liquidity, extreme supply concentration (top 10 wallets hold 97.09% of supply), and an unverified, mutable contract with unknown update authority, RATWIF presents an extremely high-risk profile consistent with a classic pump-and-dump meme token.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Catastrophic 24h price crash of -96.38%, suggesting a completed pump-and-dump cycle
Extreme supply concentration: top 10 holders control 97.09% of total supply
Reported total liquidity of $0.00 on PumpSwap, making exit nearly impossible
Only 130 total holders with the token dormant for ~30 days before a sudden 24h spike
20 identified snipers, majority in profit, indicating coordinated early accumulation

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
24–72 hours

The token has already crashed 96.38% in 24 hours. The most recent hourly candle (20:00 UTC) shows a massive wick from a high of $0.000203 down to a close of $0.00000286, confirming a completed dump. With $0 reported liquidity and sell pressure at 51.4%, further downside or complete abandonment is the most likely near-term outcome. A brief 15% bounce was observed in the last 5 minutes, but this is likely noise in an illiquid market.

Target low$0.000000500
Target high$0.000010000
Support: $0.000002234 (hourly candle low, 20:00 UTC), $0.000000500 (estimated floor given near-zero liquidity)
Resistance: $0.000037841 (prior candle open, 19:00 UTC), $0.000116376 (prior candle close, 19:00 UTC), $0.000203303 (hourly high, 20:00 UTC — peak of pump)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Given the token's history of 30 days of complete stagnation at 53 holders before a single-day spike, and the subsequent crash, medium-term recovery is highly unlikely without a new coordinated pump. The mutable contract and unknown authority add further uncertainty. Holders who did not exit during the pump are likely trapped with minimal liquidity to sell into.

Catalysts
  • A new coordinated social media campaign (Telegram mentioned in socials)
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all tokens
  • Whale accumulation at depressed prices (speculative)

Bullish factors

  • Brief 5-minute price bounce of +15% suggests some residual buying interest
  • 24h buyer count (2,433) exceeds seller count (2,026), though sell volume is slightly higher
  • 20 snipers still holding partial positions may provide a price floor

Bearish factors

  • 96.38% price crash in 24 hours — classic pump-and-dump signature
  • Total reported liquidity is $0.00, making meaningful price recovery structurally impossible without new capital
  • Top 10 holders control 97.09% of supply — any sell decision by a whale is catastrophic
  • Token was dormant for 30+ days (53 holders, zero change) before the pump event
  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — rug risk remains elevated
  • Sell volume ($597.9K) slightly exceeds buy volume ($564.25K) over 24h
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) $0 reported liquidity making price discovery unreliable, (2) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available for technical analysis, (3) the token appears to be in a post-pump collapse phase where price action is driven by thin order books and a handful of large holders, not organic market forces.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available. Candle [2] (19:00 UTC): O=$0.0000378, H=$0.0001492, L=$0.0000378, C=$0.0001164 — a strong bullish candle with a long upper wick, suggesting the pump was already losing momentum. Candle [1] (20:00 UTC): O=$0.0001134, H=$0.0002033, L=$0.0000022, C=$0.0000029 — a massive bearish engulfing/crash candle. The open was near the prior close, price briefly spiked to a new high of $0.000203 (the pump peak), then collapsed 98.6% from high to low within the same hour, closing near the absolute low. This is a textbook 'blow-off top' or 'rug candle' pattern.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 49%Sell 51%

Both available candles, when read together, show a completed pump-and-dump cycle. The medium-term trend is also bearish given 30 days of dormancy followed by a single-session spike and crash. No uptrend structure exists.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000002234 (hourly candle low, 20:00 UTC)
Major$0.000000500 (estimated structural floor given near-zero liquidity)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000037841 (prior candle open / 19:00 UTC open)
Major$0.000203303 (absolute pump high, 20:00 UTC candle high)

The only meaningful support is the recent candle low of $0.000002234. All former price levels from the pump phase now act as resistance. The pump high of $0.000203 is extremely unlikely to be revisited without a new coordinated campaign. The current price of ~$0.00000286 is just above the candle low, indicating the token is trading at the bottom of its recent range.

Notable patterns

  • Blow-off top / rug candle: massive upper wick followed by close near the absolute low in candle [1]
  • Bearish engulfing: candle [1] opens near candle [2]'s close and closes far below candle [2]'s open
  • No higher highs or higher lows — no uptrend structure present
  • Volume spike on crash candle consistent with coordinated dump execution

Total holders130
24h Δ+59
7d Δ+59
30d Δ+59
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

The 24h holder increase of +77 (59%) coincides exactly with the pump event, suggesting new buyers were attracted by the price spike. However, the 1-hour holder change of -677 (-520%) is alarming and suggests a massive wave of holders exited within the last hour, likely post-crash. The 30-day historical data shows the token was completely stagnant at 53 holders from April 7 through May 6, with zero net change for the entire period. All growth is concentrated in the last 24 hours and is directly correlated with the pump-and-dump event.

The holder history is stark: 53 holders with zero change for 30 consecutive days (April 7 – May 6, 2026), followed by a sudden spike to 130 holders (+77, +59%) in the last 24 hours. This pattern is consistent with a coordinated pump event attracting new buyers. The -677 holder change in the last 1 hour is a data anomaly that may reflect a reporting artifact or a mass exit event post-crash. Growth is not accelerating in any organic sense — it is entirely event-driven by the pump. The distribution shows 18 whales, 9 sharks, 68 dolphins, 30 fish, and 24 octopus-classified holders among 130 total.

Top 10 hold97.09%
Top 100 hold99.93%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

9StnmjdmuffkQtmPPSXzEwSmJ4Z9Z3N5LtUACKjtLAGE

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address — matches the trading pair address listed in price data)

80.71%

CS8wTpBmLpH95VnPCMP2JbeV31voYYGSQkWyXa99et1U

Individual whale / potential team wallet

7.91%

BM9CcyErJcu2mjrFvUsRRrD3snGeHDDVirJLvL6EjvMN

Individual whale / potential team wallet

5.02%

Foz15u7uHJUm2Jvz39mJtRMUBEfF1r5pvwPVQVkZUZBA

Individual whale

0.91%

Gv7c8tUJGW5itkR4jr3vHpXnhMxni1HT8J55pNpbXLEi

Individual whale

0.91%

Supply concentration is extreme. The top holder (9StnmjdmuffkQtmPPSXzEwSmJ4Z9Z3N5LtUACKjtLAGE) holds 80.71% of supply and matches the PumpSwap pair address listed in the price data — this is likely the DEX liquidity pool contract itself, meaning the vast majority of circulating supply is locked in the pool. The next two largest holders (CS8wTpBmLpH95VnPCMP2JbeV31voYYGSQkWyXa99et1U at 7.91% and BM9CcyErJcu2mjrFvUsRRrD3snGeHDDVirJLvL6EjvMN at 5.02%) are unclassified wallets that together hold ~13% of supply — a significant concentration risk. The top 10 wallets collectively hold 97.09% and the top 100 hold 99.93%, leaving only 0.07% of supply distributed beyond the top 100. The overall whale sentiment is distributing, consistent with the post-pump sell-off observed in price action.

Liquidity$0.00 (as reported)
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$564,250
Sell$597,900
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers2,433
Unique sellers2,026

The reported total liquidity of $0.00 is the most alarming data point in this analysis. Despite $1.16M+ in combined 24h trading volume (4,733 buys, 4,953 sells), the pool reports zero liquidity depth. This is consistent with a PumpFun/PumpSwap token where liquidity was thin to begin with and has been largely drained during the dump. The net flow is negative (sell volume $597.9K > buy volume $564.25K), confirming capital outflow. While unique buyers (2,433) outnumber unique sellers (2,026), the sell volume dominance suggests sellers are transacting in larger average sizes. Slippage risk is extremely high — any meaningful sell order will move the price dramatically in a pool with near-zero liquidity. The market health is critically impaired.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (with 0 decimals — note: holder balances in the quadrillions suggest the formatted supply of '1' is misleading; the raw on-chain supply appears to be in the hundreds of quadrillions based on holder balances, e.g. top holder balance: 807,110,226,859,003)
FDV$0.00 (as reported; effectively near-zero given current price)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The metadata reports a total supply of '1' with 0 decimals, but this is contradicted by the holder balance data which shows the top holder alone holds 807,110,226,859,003 raw units. This discrepancy strongly suggests a data formatting issue — the actual supply is likely in the hundreds of quadrillions of base units. The contract is unverified, mutable (Mutable: true), and the update authority is listed as 'unknown'. Mutability means the token metadata can be changed by whoever holds the update authority — a significant rug risk vector. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the provided data, so both are marked 'unknown'. The FDV is reported as $0.00, consistent with the near-zero price and ambiguous supply figures. This token was launched via PumpFun (pump suffix in mint address), which typically uses a bonding curve mechanism.

Volatility
high

96.38% price crash in 24 hours. The token moved from ~$0.000114 open to a high of $0.000203 and then collapsed to $0.00000286 — a 98.6% drop from peak within a single hourly candle. Extreme volatility is the defining characteristic of this token.

Liquidity
high

Total reported liquidity is $0.00. Despite over $1.16M in 24h trading volume, the pool has been effectively drained. Any holder attempting to sell faces catastrophic slippage or inability to exit.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 97.09% of supply; top 100 control 99.93%. Even excluding the likely DEX pool address (80.71%), the next two wallets hold ~13% combined. A single whale decision to sell can move the price to zero.

SniperDump
high

20 identified snipers, nearly all in profit with positive realized PnL percentages ranging from 1.9% to 324.6%. The largest sellers (DT2MmU: $3,649; E6yRAU: $2,877; 2qTd9o: $1,024) have already taken profits. Remaining sniper positions represent ongoing dump risk.

Authority
high

Contract is unverified and mutable (Mutable: true). Update authority is unknown. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The combination of mutability and unknown authority creates significant rug risk — metadata, and potentially token behavior, could be altered by an unknown party.

Key risks

  • Complete loss of capital — token has already crashed 96.38% and liquidity is reported at $0
  • Whale/team dump risk: wallets CS8wTpBmLpH95VnPCMP2JbeV31voYYGSQkWyXa99et1U (7.91%) and BM9CcyErJcu2mjrFvUsRRrD3snGeHDDVirJLvL6EjvMN (5.02%) hold large concentrated positions
  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — potential for metadata manipulation or rug
  • Zero liquidity makes exit impossible for any meaningful position size
  • Token was dormant for 30+ days before pump — no organic community or utility
  • Sniper wallets continue to hold residual positions and may sell remaining bags

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buyer count (2,433) exceeds seller count (2,026), suggesting some residual demand
  • 20 snipers with mostly positive PnL have already sold significant portions, reducing future dump pressure from this cohort
  • PumpFun launch mechanism provides some initial structure (bonding curve)
  • Token is not flagged as spam by the data provider
Suitable for: This token is suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of any capital deployed. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for complete loss. Given the post-crash state and zero liquidity, even speculative entry carries extreme risk.

RATWIF is a classic PumpFun meme token that has completed a pump-and-dump cycle. The token launched, attracted sniper bots and early buyers, pumped aggressively within a short window, and then crashed 96.38% in 24 hours. With zero reported liquidity, 97.09% supply concentration in the top 10 wallets, a mutable unverified contract, and 30 days of prior dormancy, there is no credible fundamental investment thesis. Any remaining interest is purely speculative.

Bull case (low)

A new coordinated social media campaign (leveraging the Telegram community) drives a second pump wave, attracting fresh retail buyers and temporarily restoring price to the $0.000037–$0.000116 range (prior candle levels).

  • Renewed Telegram/social media promotion
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Low absolute price ($0.00000286) attracting lottery-ticket speculators
  • Residual sniper holders providing a price floor

Base case

The token trades at near-zero prices ($0.000001–$0.000005) with minimal volume and sporadic micro-pumps driven by thin liquidity. It gradually fades into obscurity over the next 7–30 days as holders give up and the token becomes effectively dead.

  • No new coordinated promotion campaign
  • Remaining whale holders (CS8wTpBmLpH95VnPCMP2JbeV31voYYGSQkWyXa99et1U, BM9CcyErJcu2mjrFvUsRRrD3snGeHDDVirJLvL6EjvMN) do not aggressively dump remaining bags
  • Liquidity remains near zero
  • No new utility or partnership announcements

Bear case (high)

The token continues to bleed out with zero new buyers, liquidity remains at $0, and the price drifts to effectively zero as remaining holders abandon their positions. The mutable contract is exploited or the token is simply forgotten.

  • Zero reported liquidity makes recovery structurally impossible without new capital injection
  • 30-day dormancy pattern suggests no organic community — the pump was entirely coordinated
  • Mutable contract with unknown authority creates ongoing rug risk
  • Snipers and whales have already extracted value; no incentive to support price
  • 96.38% crash has likely destroyed retail confidence

GeneratedMay 7, 08:48 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of approximately 2026-05-07T20:00 UTC. Holder historical data covers April 7 – May 6, 2026 (daily). Only 2 hourly OHLC candles provided.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint: B4eAiVxxWMkBUrTkVNGMjqeHPcbqtpzfK52d3NAWpump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (pair: 9StnmjdmuffkQtmPPSXzEwSmJ4Z9Z3N5LtUACKjtLAGE)
  • Hourly OHLC price data (2 candles, 2026-05-07 19:00–20:00 UTC)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30 days daily)
  • Top 20 holder distribution data
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may be a data lag or reporting artifact, but taken at face value
  • Sniper USD amounts sniped are 'unknown' — exact sniper concentration % cannot be precisely calculated
  • Total supply metadata ('1' with 0 decimals) contradicts raw holder balance data — supply figures are unreliable
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are all unknown — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
  • The -677 holder change in 1 hour is likely a data anomaly and has been noted but not used as a primary signal
  • No order book depth data available — slippage estimates are qualitative
  • Historical holder data only goes back 30 days and shows zero change for the entire period prior to the last 24 hours

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The analyst has no position in RATWIF. All data is sourced from the inputs provided and may contain errors or omissions. Do not make investment decisions based solely on this report.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (with 0 decimals — note: holder balances in the quadrillions suggest the formatted supply of '1' is misleading; the raw on-chain supply appears to be in the hundreds of quadrillions based on holder balances, e.g. top holder balance: 807,110,226,859,003)

Key Risks

•Complete loss of capital — token has already crashed 96.38% and liquidity is reported at $0
•Whale/team dump risk: wallets CS8wTpBmLpH95VnPCMP2JbeV31voYYGSQkWyXa99et1U (7.91%) and BM9CcyErJcu2mjrFvUsRRrD3snGeHDDVirJLvL6EjvMN (5.02%) hold large concentrated positions
•Mutable contract with unknown update authority — potential for metadata manipulation or rug
•Zero liquidity makes exit impossible for any meaningful position size

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

medium confidence
High risk

Of the 20 identified snipers, the vast majority show positive realized PnL percentages, confirming they entered early at very low cost basis and have been selling into the pump. The two largest sellers by USD volume are DT2MmUjCwLTcP6etg8Utre1mv5nLjh3UvPU7gFpuTKYk ($3,649 sold, +15.6% PnL) and E6yRAUuGjpAdgS5cLcFT6Vbgm34rpqUAoFFp9PqNrvkP ($2,877 sold, +48.5% PnL). Only 2 snipers show 0% realized PnL (likely haven't sold yet or broke even). The high sell-through rate among snipers is a strong signal that informed early buyers have largely exited, leaving retail holders holding the bag. Exact sniper supply concentration cannot be computed as individual sniped amounts in USD/tokens are unknown, but the 20 snipers across 1,000 blocks with near-universal profitability is a red flag.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration5.20%
PnL stateMostly In Profit
Sell-through rateHigh
Profit-taking risk
high

20 identified snipers; most have sold significant portions. Top realized PnL examples: HaYrig3 +324.6%, F7RV6a +207.6%, 2qTd9o +141.8%, 3SkBCx +137.1%, 9e7Vh1 +92.9%, CAdoKe +81.3%, DQmMna +58.5%, 9znjJd +59.4%, E6yRAU +48.5% (sold $2,877), DT2MmU +15.6% (sold $3,649).

Early buyers (snipers) are overwhelmingly in profit and have been actively selling. Sentiment among this cohort is distributive — they accumulated early, pumped, and are exiting. Remaining retail holders acquired during or after the pump at much higher prices.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for ratwifhat (RATWIF)?

The token has already crashed 96.38% in 24 hours. The most recent hourly candle (20:00 UTC) shows a massive wick from a high of $0.000203 down to a close of $0.00000286, confirming a completed dump. With $0 reported liquidity and sell pressure at 51.4%, further downside or complete abandonment is the most likely near-term outcome. A brief 15% bounce was observed in the last 5 minutes, but this is likely noise in an illiquid market. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000000500 to $0.000010000.

Is RATWIF a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.4/100. This token is suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of any capital deployed. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for complete loss. Given the post-crash state and zero liquidity, even speculative entry carries extreme risk.

How are RATWIF holders trending?

ratwifhat currently has 130 holders and is growing (24h: 59, 7d: 59, 30d: 59). The holder history is stark: 53 holders with zero change for 30 consecutive days (April 7 – May 6, 2026), followed by a sudden spike to 130 holders (+77, +59%) in the last 24 hours. This pattern is consistent with a coordinated pump event attracting new buyers. The -677 holder change in the last 1 hour is a data anomaly that may reflect a reporting artifact or a mass exit event post-crash. Growth is not accelerating in any organic sense — it is entirely event-driven by the pump. The distribution shows 18 whales, 9 sharks, 68 dolphins, 30 fish, and 24 octopus-classified holders among 130 total.

What does sniper activity look like for RATWIF?

Snipers hold roughly 5.20% of supply with PnL state "mostly_in_profit" and sell-through rate "high". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding RATWIF?

Complete loss of capital — token has already crashed 96.38% and liquidity is reported at $0 • Whale/team dump risk: wallets CS8wTpBmLpH95VnPCMP2JbeV31voYYGSQkWyXa99et1U (7.91%) and BM9CcyErJcu2mjrFvUsRRrD3snGeHDDVirJLvL6EjvMN (5.02%) hold large concentrated positions • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — potential for metadata manipulation or rug

← Back to all predictions

Track RATWIF