SOL world

All love SOL. SOL's world now Price Prediction 2026

SOL world
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 27, 2026

AxTnbH2ccb8FDRX4YYbjkFdVXc8kecCVD2TM1k87pump

$0.051523

FDV $1,523

LiveContract:AxTnbH2ccb8FDRX4YYbjkFdVXc8kecCVD2TM1k87pumpChain:SolanaHolders:74Market cap:$1,523

More tokens on Solana

TripleTROLL

TripleTROLL

Troll Troll Troll Sahur

$0.0517900.0%
MC $1.8K
PEPEGRUG

PEPEGRUG

Pepe Grug

$0.0514530.0%
MC $1.5K
WISP

WISP

Spiral Wisp

$0.0518450.0%
MC $1.8K
POPSEM

POPSEM

Popsem

$0.0531050.0%
MC $3.1K
GUIN

GUIN

GuinGuin

$0.0516030.0%
MC $1.6K
XST

XST

XST

$0.057656.5%
MC $57.58M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about SOL world

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jun 27, 09:16 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$48,617

Holders

789

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

SOL World (symbol: SOL world, mint: AxTnbH2ccb8FDRX4YYbjkFdVXc8kecCVD2TM1k87pump) is an extremely low-cap, unverified Solana meme/spam token launched on PumpSwap. The token has a total supply of 1 (indivisible, 0 decimals), a fully diluted valuation of ~$201.54, and only $48.62K in liquidity. The data reveals severe anomalies: 784 of 789 holders appeared within the last hour (99% of all holders), sell pressure dominates at 94.8% of 24h volume, and top holder/concentration data is entirely unavailable. The token's metadata is mutable, update authority is unknown, and the contract is unverified. These are hallmarks of a newly launched, highly speculative, and potentially manipulated token.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Total supply of exactly 1 token with 0 decimals — highly unusual tokenomics
99% of all 789 holders acquired within the last 1 hour, suggesting a coordinated launch or airdrop event
94.8% sell pressure in 24h ($280.69K sell vs $15.36K buy volume) despite a 102% price pump
Fully diluted valuation of only ~$201.54 with $48.62K liquidity — extreme illiquidity relative to trading volume
No top holder data available and supply concentration reported as 0% for top 10 and top 100 — data anomaly

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token pumped ~102% in 24h but is already showing a -4.09% drop in the last 5 minutes. With 94.8% sell pressure, 2,584 sells vs 281 buys, and only $48.62K liquidity, the price is highly vulnerable to rapid collapse. The most recent candle (hour 1) shows a close at the high ($0.000201543), but the prior candle (hour 2) had an enormous range from $0.0000257 to $0.000216 — a classic pump candle. Continuation is unlikely given the sell dominance.

Target low$0.000050
Target high$0.000210
Support: $0.000196 (hour 1 open / hour 2 close), $0.0000257 (hour 2 open / session low)
Resistance: $0.000201543 (current price / hour 1 high), $0.000216 (hour 2 high / session high)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Given the structural anomalies — 0 decimals, total supply of 1, no verified contract, mutable metadata, unknown update authority, and overwhelming sell pressure — medium-term price sustainability is extremely unlikely. The token has no organic holder growth history (flat at 5 holders for 30 days before a sudden 784-holder spike), suggesting artificial activity. A return toward near-zero is the most probable medium-term outcome.

Catalysts
  • Any whale or early holder exit will collapse price given shallow liquidity
  • Lack of verified contract or credible project fundamentals
  • Continued sell pressure from the 504 unique sellers already active in 24h
  • Potential rug or abandonment given mutable metadata and unknown update authority

Bullish factors

  • Price has already pumped 102% in 24h, showing some demand exists
  • Only 2 candles available — the most recent closed at its high, suggesting short-term momentum
  • Low absolute price ($0.000201) means small capital can move price significantly

Bearish factors

  • 94.8% sell pressure — 2,584 sells vs 281 buys in 24h
  • Only $48.62K total liquidity — extremely shallow, high slippage risk
  • 99% of holders appeared in the last hour — highly suspicious, likely coordinated
  • No verified contract, mutable metadata, unknown update authority
  • Historical holder count was flat at 5 for 30+ days before sudden spike
  • FDV of only ~$201.54 — near-zero fundamental value
  • Price % change shown as 0% for 1h, 6h, and 24h in analytics despite 102% 24h change — data inconsistency suggesting possible manipulation or data feed issues
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme data anomalies: missing top holder data, 0% concentration figures that are likely data errors, a total supply of 1 with 0 decimals making standard price modeling inapplicable, and only 2 OHLC candles available for technical analysis. The token's behavior is highly irregular and difficult to model reliably.

SOL world call history

Full track record →
Jun 27bearish
24h-99.2%
7d-99.1%
30d-99.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available. Candle 2 (20:00 UTC) was an explosive pump candle: open $0.0000257, high $0.000216, low $0.0000257, close $0.000196 — a massive bullish body with a long upper wick, indicating strong buying followed by partial profit-taking. Volume was $222,910. Candle 1 (21:00 UTC) is a narrow-range candle: open $0.000196, high $0.000201, low $0.000196, close $0.000201 — a small bullish candle closing at its high, but on dramatically reduced volume ($67,667). The pattern suggests the initial pump momentum is fading.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 5%Sell 95%

Short-term trend is technically up given the 102% pump, but the narrow range of candle 1 and the -4.09% drop in the last 5 minutes suggest the uptrend is stalling. Medium-term trend is effectively sideways-to-down given the overwhelming sell pressure and lack of fundamental support.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000196 (candle 1 open = candle 2 close)
Major$0.0000257 (candle 2 open / session low — pre-pump base)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000201543 (candle 1 high / current price)
Major$0.000216 (candle 2 high / session high)

Immediate support sits at $0.000196 (the open of candle 1 and close of candle 2). A break below this level would expose the token to a rapid decline toward the pre-pump base of $0.0000257. Immediate resistance is the current price/candle 1 high at $0.000201543, with major resistance at the session high of $0.000216. Given the shallow liquidity, these levels can be breached quickly in either direction.

Notable patterns

  • Explosive pump candle (candle 2): open equals low, large body, upper wick — classic pump-and-dump initiation pattern
  • Volume exhaustion: ~70% volume drop from candle 2 to candle 1 while price consolidates near highs — bearish divergence
  • Upper wick rejection on candle 2 at $0.000216 — sellers active at the top
  • Narrow-range candle 1 closing at its high on low volume — potential bull trap before reversal
  • Only 2 candles available — insufficient data for robust pattern confirmation

Total holders789
24h Δ+784
7d Δ+784
30d Δ+784
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The 784-holder spike occurred simultaneously with the 102% price pump in the last 24h (and specifically the last 1h based on the +784 in 1h data). This correlation is suspicious — it suggests the holder increase may be artificial (e.g., coordinated distribution, airdrop, or wash activity) rather than organic retail adoption driven by price discovery.

The historical holder data shows the token was completely stagnant at exactly 5 holders for the entire 30-day observation window (May 28 – June 26, 2026), with zero net change on every single day. Then, within the last 1 hour of data, 784 new holders appeared simultaneously — representing a 99% increase in total holders in a single hour. This is a severe anomaly. Organic token adoption does not produce this pattern. The most likely explanations are: (1) a coordinated airdrop to create artificial holder count, (2) a bot-driven distribution scheme, or (3) a data artifact. Combined with the 94.8% sell pressure, this pattern is a major red flag.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available — the top holders endpoint returned no data for this token

0.00%

No top holder data is available for this token. The supply concentration metrics report 0% for both top 10 and top 100 holders, which is almost certainly a data anomaly rather than a genuine reflection of distribution — a token with a total supply of 1 (indivisible) must be held by a single wallet at any given time, making 0% concentration figures nonsensical. The distribution is classified as 'very_concentrated' by inference: with a total supply of 1 and 0 decimals, the entire supply is held by one address. The 'whale=0, shark=0, dolphin=0, fish=0, octopus=0' distribution breakdown further confirms data unavailability. The overwhelming sell pressure (94.8%) suggests the dominant holder(s) are in distribution mode.

Liquidity$48,620
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$15,360
Sell$280,690
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers91
Unique sellers504

Market health is extremely poor. Total liquidity of $48.62K is dwarfed by 24h sell volume of $280.69K — sellers have moved nearly 6x the total liquidity pool in a single day. The buy/sell ratio is severely imbalanced: 504 unique sellers vs 91 unique buyers, with 2,584 sell transactions vs 281 buy transactions. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow). Slippage risk is high — any meaningful position exit will move the price significantly given the shallow pool. The token trades on PumpSwap (pair 2v5Q6y1qy6CksdnvngDfiCp2hk86w8mTPwtD3mVKgMbz), a platform associated with newly launched, speculative tokens. The FDV of ~$201.54 against $48.62K liquidity means liquidity is actually ~241x the FDV — an unusual and suspicious ratio suggesting the liquidity pool may be artificially inflated relative to the token's market cap.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (0 decimals — indivisible)
FDV$201.54

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The tokenomics of this token are highly anomalous. The total supply is exactly 1 with 0 decimals, meaning the token is completely indivisible — there is only one unit of this token in existence. This is an extremely unusual structure for a tradeable token and raises serious questions about its legitimacy and purpose. The FDV is only ~$201.54, making it one of the lowest-value tokens possible. The metadata is marked as mutable (Mutable: true), the update authority is listed as 'unknown', and the contract is unverified. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data. The combination of mutable metadata and unknown update authority means the token's properties could be changed at any time by the creator, representing a high rug risk. The token is not a master edition NFT but has NFT-like supply characteristics.

Volatility
high

The token pumped 102% in 24h and dropped 4.09% in 5 minutes. With only $48.62K liquidity and a total supply of 1 indivisible token, price swings are extreme and unpredictable. The pump candle (candle 2) had a range from $0.0000257 to $0.000216 — an 8.4x range in a single hour.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $48.62K. Sell volume in 24h ($280.69K) is nearly 6x the total liquidity. Any significant exit will cause severe slippage. The shallow pool on PumpSwap provides minimal price support.

Concentration
high

With a total supply of 1 indivisible token, concentration is by definition 100% in a single wallet. Top holder data is unavailable, but the tokenomics make extreme concentration mathematically certain. The 5 original holders (present for 30+ days) likely control the entire supply.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available. However, the 5 wallets that held the token for 30+ days before the pump are the functional equivalent of snipers — they had exclusive access during the accumulation phase and are now likely distributing into the pump, as evidenced by the 94.8% sell pressure.

Authority
high

Metadata is mutable (Mutable: true), update authority is unknown, and the contract is unverified. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. These factors mean the token creator retains the ability to modify the token, freeze accounts, or mint additional supply — all classic rug pull vectors.

Key risks

  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals — fundamentally broken tokenomics for a tradeable asset
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull risk
  • 94.8% sell pressure — insiders/early holders actively dumping
  • 784 holders appeared in 1 hour after 30+ days of stagnation — highly suspicious, likely artificial
  • No top holder data available — cannot assess true concentration
  • Only $48.62K liquidity against $280.69K in 24h sell volume — extreme slippage risk
  • Unverified contract on PumpSwap — no audit or credibility signals
  • FDV of only $201.54 — near-zero fundamental value
  • Price % change data inconsistency (shows 0% for 1h/6h/24h despite 102% pump) — possible data manipulation or feed error

Mitigating factors

  • Token is flagged as 'possible spam: false' by the data provider (though this is a low bar)
  • Social links (Twitter, website, Moralis) exist, suggesting some minimal creator presence
  • The 102% price pump shows there is some market demand, however speculative
Suitable for: This token is unsuitable for virtually all investors. It may only be considered by highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand they are likely participating in a pump-and-dump scheme, can afford to lose 100% of their capital, and are trading with negligible position sizes. This is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone seeking capital preservation.

SOL World presents no credible investment thesis. The token exhibits nearly every hallmark of a pump-and-dump scheme: a total supply of 1 indivisible token, 30+ days of dormancy followed by a sudden 784-holder spike in 1 hour, 94.8% sell pressure, mutable unverified metadata, unknown update authority, and a FDV of only ~$201.54. The 102% price pump is almost certainly a coordinated event by the original 5 holders distributing into manufactured demand. There is no evidence of utility, community, or sustainable value creation.

Bull case (low)

Speculative momentum continuation: if the pump attracts additional retail FOMO buyers in the short term, the price could briefly test or exceed the session high of $0.000216 before collapsing.

  • Continued retail FOMO from the 102% pump narrative
  • Low absolute price ($0.000201) attracting micro-cap speculators
  • Social media attention from Twitter/website links

Base case

Gradual price decay: selling pressure continues to outpace buying, price drifts down from current $0.000201 toward the $0.000050–$0.000100 range over the next 24–72 hours as the pump fades and no new catalysts emerge.

  • No new coordinated buying campaigns emerge
  • Liquidity remains at current levels (~$48.62K)
  • The 504 unique sellers continue to exit positions
  • No viral social media event creates a second pump wave

Bear case (high)

Rapid collapse to near-zero: the original 5 holders complete their distribution, liquidity is withdrawn, and the price returns to pre-pump levels (~$0.0000257) or lower. Potential total loss for anyone who bought during the pump.

  • 94.8% sell pressure already in progress
  • Mutable metadata allows creator to modify or abandon the token
  • No fundamental value — FDV of $201.54
  • Shallow $48.62K liquidity cannot absorb continued selling
  • Historical precedent: tokens with this pattern almost universally collapse

GeneratedJun 27, 09:16 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-06-27T21:00:00 UTC. OHLC data covers the last 2 hourly candles. Historical holder data covers May 28 – June 26, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics
  • Hourly OHLC price feed (2 candles)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Trading volume and buyer/seller analytics
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No top holder data available — concentration and whale analysis is severely limited
  • Sniper data unavailable — smart money signals based on sniper analysis are not possible
  • Supply concentration reported as 0% for top 10 and top 100 — likely a data error given total supply of 1
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm mint/freeze authority status
  • The 784-holder spike in 1 hour may be a data artifact or reporting delay rather than a genuine on-chain event
  • Price % change fields show 0% for 1h/6h/24h despite a 102% 24h pump — possible data feed inconsistency
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is an unusual structure that makes standard tokenomics analysis inapplicable

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap and newly launched tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed contains multiple anomalies and red flags consistent with manipulative trading patterns. Do not invest based solely on this analysis. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (0 decimals — indivisible)

Key Risks

•Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals — fundamentally broken tokenomics for a tradeable asset
•Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull risk
•94.8% sell pressure — insiders/early holders actively dumping
•784 holders appeared in 1 hour after 30+ days of stagnation — highly suspicious, likely artificial

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. However, the broader trading data is deeply concerning: 504 unique sellers vs 91 unique buyers in 24h, with sell volume ($280.69K) representing 94.8% of total volume. This strongly suggests that whoever accumulated early (possibly the 5 holders present for 30+ days before the spike) is distributing aggressively into the pump. The sudden appearance of 784 new holders in 1 hour is anomalous and may reflect a coordinated distribution or airdrop to create the appearance of organic adoption.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available — the sniper analysis endpoint returned no data for this token.

Highly negative — the overwhelming sell pressure (94.8%) and 2,584 sells vs 281 buys in 24h suggest early holders or insiders are aggressively exiting. The token had only 5 holders for 30+ days, meaning those original 5 holders had ample time to accumulate before the pump.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for All love SOL. SOL's world now (SOL world)?

The token pumped ~102% in 24h but is already showing a -4.09% drop in the last 5 minutes. With 94.8% sell pressure, 2,584 sells vs 281 buys, and only $48.62K liquidity, the price is highly vulnerable to rapid collapse. The most recent candle (hour 1) shows a close at the high ($0.000201543), but the prior candle (hour 2) had an enormous range from $0.0000257 to $0.000216 — a classic pump candle. Continuation is unlikely given the sell dominance. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000050 to $0.000210.

Is SOL world a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.4/100. This token is unsuitable for virtually all investors. It may only be considered by highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand they are likely participating in a pump-and-dump scheme, can afford to lose 100% of their capital, and are trading with negligible position sizes. This is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone seeking capital preservation.

How are SOL world holders trending?

All love SOL. SOL's world now currently has 789 holders and is growing (24h: 784, 7d: 784, 30d: 784). The historical holder data shows the token was completely stagnant at exactly 5 holders for the entire 30-day observation window (May 28 – June 26, 2026), with zero net change on every single day. Then, within the last 1 hour of data, 784 new holders appeared simultaneously — representing a 99% increase in total holders in a single hour. This is a severe anomaly. Organic token adoption does not produce this pattern. The most likely explanations are: (1) a coordinated airdrop to create artificial holder count, (2) a bot-driven distribution scheme, or (3) a data artifact. Combined with the 94.8% sell pressure, this pattern is a major red flag.

What does sniper activity look like for SOL world?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding SOL world?

Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals — fundamentally broken tokenomics for a tradeable asset • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull risk • 94.8% sell pressure — insiders/early holders actively dumping

← Back to all predictions

Track SOL world