Pokémon Price Today & AI Analysis

PokémonSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 12, 2026

$0.0₅2234

Contract

Live

Awo91Xpy8ojenaUojdbuLKV2ZfLYAr3tE4XLzj5Hpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

Market cap

$2,234

At a $1M market cap, $POKÉMON would be $0.001000 (448x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is Pokémon a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 25

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about Pokémon

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

IDBInter-Dimensional Being$0.0₅3134+0.0%MC $3.1K

ALLOXAlloX$0.0₅2217+0.0%MC $221.7K

PROOSTPIPE ROOST$0.0₅2573+0.0%MC $2.5K

TripleTROLLTroll Troll Troll Sahur$0.0₅2216+0.0%MC $2.2K

PEPEGRUGPepe Grug$0.0₅2258+0.0%MC $2.3K

ZECZcash$1,240.2+3.9%MC $127.62M

Pokémon: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-12 11:19 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$271,717.00

How concentrated is Pokémon ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Pokémon?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Pokémon liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-12 11:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $271,717.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-12 11:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 12, 11:19 AM UTC

FDV

$40,979,056

Liquidity

$271,717.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Pokémon (Awo91Xpy8ojenaUojdbuLKV2ZfLYAr3tE4XLzj5Hpump) is a PumpSwap-listed token that has gone parabolic in the last 4 hours, rising from roughly $0.0000418 to $0.041 (a reported 24h change of ~95,586%, which reflects its extremely recent launch/price discovery rather than a sustained trend). FDV sits at ~$41M against only ~$271.7K of total liquidity, an extremely thin liquidity-to-valuation ratio typical of freshly launched pump.fun-style tokens. Trading is dominated by buy pressure (91.4% buy vs 8.6% sell over 24h) with over 1,300 unique buyers, but the token has no holder distribution data, no sniper data, and unclear authority status, all of which materially limit confidence in any risk or valuation conclusion.

Key points

Uses the 'Pokémon' name/branding, which is a third-party IP and not an officially affiliated project — a naming/trademark and adversarial-labeling red flag
Extreme, likely launch-phase price action (candles show O:0.0000418 -> C:0.041 in ~4 hours) rather than organic multi-day trend
Very thin liquidity (~$271.7K) relative to $41M FDV, implying high slippage and fragility
No holder or sniper data available from upstream sources, creating a significant analytical blind spot

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

Price has expanded roughly 100x within the last 4 hourly candles on thin liquidity, with the most recent candle showing deceleration (high 0.04098, close 0.04098, versus the prior candle's much larger range). 5m change (+2.6%) is far smaller than the 1h change (+40.7%), suggesting momentum may be cooling from its most explosive phase. Given the shallow $271.7K liquidity pool, sharp reversals or wicks in either direction are likely.

Target low

$0.028

Target high

$0.055

Support: $0.0374 (candle 3 open / candle 4 low), $0.0259 (candle 2 close), $0.0250 (candle 1 close)
Resistance: $0.0410 (candle 4 high/close, current level), psychological $0.05

Medium term · 3-14 days

neutral

With only 4 hourly candles of history, there is no meaningful medium-term trend to project. Tokens that spike this violently on pump.fun/PumpSwap-style launches frequently either continue a short squeeze into a local top followed by a sharp retracement, or fade quickly once early buyers take profit. Sustained appreciation would require continued new buyer inflow (currently strong at 1,385 buyers vs 1,121 sellers) and liquidity growth beyond the current thin $271.7K base.

Catalysts

Continued organic buyer inflow / social virality (Twitter link present)
Liquidity additions that reduce slippage risk and attract larger holders
Potential loss of momentum leading to profit-taking cascade given no visible holder lockups or vesting data
Unknown mint/freeze authority status could resolve into either a rug-pull risk realization or confidence-building renouncement news

Bullish factors

Strong 24h buy pressure at 91.4% of volume with 1,385 unique buyers outnumbering 1,121 sellers
Rapid price appreciation across all 4 available candles with higher highs and higher closes each hour
Twitter/social presence suggests active community promotion driving buy-side demand

Bearish factors

Liquidity of only ~$271.7K versus a $41M FDV is extremely shallow, meaning even moderate sell orders could crash price
24h % change of ~95,586% strongly signals a brand-new, unproven token in an unstable price-discovery phase rather than sustainable growth
No data on mint/freeze authority, holder concentration, or sniper wallets — inability to rule out rug-pull or insider dump risk
5m momentum (+2.6%) is much weaker than 1h momentum (+40.7%), a possible sign of decelerating buying interest

Confidence: low. Only 4 hourly candles are available, holder and sniper data are entirely absent, and authority/verification metadata is unknown. The extreme and very recent price move makes any projection highly speculative; confidence is low.

Pokémon call history

Full track record →

Sep 12neutral@ $0.0410

24h—

7d—

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: Awo91X...pump
Total Supply: 999,927,782.73 tokens

Key Risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($271.72K) relative to $40.98M FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Unknown mint/freeze authority status prevents ruling out supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer
No holder distribution or sniper data available, eliminating visibility into concentration and insider dump risk
Parabolic, launch-phase price action (~95,586% 24h) is inherently unstable and prone to sharp reversals

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Across the 4 available hourly candles, price moved from an opening low of $0.0000418629 to a close of $0.0409820, representing a near-vertical, low-timeframe uptrend. Candle 1 shows an enormous range (O:0.0000419 -> C:0.02506), effectively a launch/price-discovery candle with volume of $210.3K. Candle 2 was a narrow-range consolidation ($0.02506-$0.02584, V:$10.0K). Candle 3 broke out again with a strong bullish body (O:0.02584 -> C:0.03739, V:$80.6K). Candle 4 continued higher but with a much smaller range and lower volume ($0.03739 -> $0.04098, V:$22.3K), suggesting the initial explosive momentum is tapering.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

All 4 candles printed higher highs and higher closes, forming a clean short-term uptrend since the token's apparent launch. However, the pattern of decreasing volume on the last two candles relative to the initial breakout raises the possibility of a stalling or consolidating uptrend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

91%

Sell

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0374 (candle 3/4 open-low zone)

Major support

$0.0250-$0.0259 (candle 1-2 close zone)

Immediate resistance

$0.0410 (current all-time high, candle 4 close)

Major resistance

$0.0500 (psychological round number above current highs)

With only 4 candles of history, support/resistance levels are provisional. The clearest support band sits at $0.0250-$0.0259 where price consolidated in candle 2 before its second breakout; a break below $0.0374 (candle 3/4 boundary) would signal a retest of that lower band. Resistance is effectively the current all-time high near $0.041, with no historical rejection data above that level.

Notable patterns

Parabolic launch candle (candle 1) followed by a tight consolidation bar (candle 2) — a classic 'flagging' pattern after an initial pump
Second breakout candle (candle 3) with a wide bullish body and high volume, followed by a smaller-bodied continuation candle (candle 4) with falling volume — potential early exhaustion signal
Sequential higher highs and higher closes across all 4 candles indicate short-term bullish structure despite waning volume

Liquidity

$271,717.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just ~$271.7K against a $40.98M fully diluted valuation is extremely shallow — a ratio of roughly 0.66%, meaning even moderately sized trades could produce significant price impact/slippage. However, 24h flow is heavily skewed toward buying: $287.27K in buy volume vs only $27.11K in sell volume (net inflow of ~$260K), and unique buyers (1,385) outnumber unique sellers (1,121). This buy-dominant flow is consistent with the token's rapid price appreciation, but the thin liquidity base means this dynamic could reverse violently if sentiment shifts or large holders exit.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,927,782.73 tokens

FDV

$40,979,056

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved from $0.0000419 to $0.0410 within 4 hourly candles (~95,586% reported 24h change), and 1h change alone was +40.7%. This is extreme volatility typical of brand-new low-liquidity launches.
Liquidityhigh
Only ~$271.72K in total liquidity against a $40.98M FDV creates a very high risk of slippage and price manipulation; large trades can move the market significantly.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($271.72K) relative to $40.98M FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Unknown mint/freeze authority status prevents ruling out supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer
No holder distribution or sniper data available, eliminating visibility into concentration and insider dump risk
Parabolic, launch-phase price action (~95,586% 24h) is inherently unstable and prone to sharp reversals
Use of 'Pokémon' branding (a well-known third-party IP) without any verified affiliation is a common pattern in opportunistic/meme-coin token launches

Mitigating factors

Strong current buy-side flow with 91.4% buy volume and more unique buyers (1,385) than sellers (1,121) over 24h
Presence of a social (Twitter) link suggests some level of community/marketing activity
Consistent higher-highs pattern across all 4 available candles suggests, for now, sustained buyer interest rather than an immediate collapse

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; not appropriate for conservative investors or those seeking exposure based on fundamentals, given the near-total absence of holder, sniper, and authority verification data combined with extreme, very recent volatility.

Pokémon (Awo91Xpy...) is an extremely fresh, high-volatility PumpSwap token that has surged ~95,586% over the reported 24h window on thin liquidity ($271.72K) and strong but narrow buy-side flow. The setup has classic hallmarks of a pump.fun-style meme launch: minimal verifiable fundamentals (unknown authorities, no holder/sniper data), aggressive early price action, and appropriation of well-known third-party IP branding. Any position here is a high-risk speculative bet on continued momentum and marketing/virality rather than a fundamentals-driven investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued viral momentum and buyer inflow push the token to new highs above the current $0.041 level, with liquidity deepening as market cap grows, potentially attracting further speculative capital rotation from meme-coin traders.

Sustained 91.4% buy-volume dominance and buyer count exceeding sellers over the last 24h
Active social media promotion (Twitter presence) that could go further viral given the recognizable 'Pokémon' branding
Pattern of higher highs across all available candles signaling short-term bullish structure

Base Case

Price consolidates or experiences a moderate pullback from current levels ($0.041) as the initial launch-phase volatility subsides, trading within the $0.025-$0.05 range while the market digests the token's viability absent fundamental verification.

No major liquidity injection or authority-renouncement confirmation occurs in the near term
Buy/sell flow remains roughly balanced to slightly buy-favored, consistent with current 91.4%/8.6% split
No confirmed rug-pull or mass insider dump occurs, but normal profit-taking from early buyers gradually increases sell pressure

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic move exhausts quickly, sniper/insider or early-buyer wallets (unverifiable due to lack of data) dump into the thin liquidity pool, causing a sharp price collapse similar to many pump.fun launches that spike and then crash within hours to days.

Extremely shallow liquidity ($271.72K) relative to $40.98M FDV magnifies downside price impact from even modest selling
Declining volume on the most recent candle despite continued price increase, a possible early exhaustion/divergence signal
Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of deployer-side rug-pull actions
Use of unaffiliated third-party IP ('Pokémon') is a recurring pattern in short-lived speculative meme-coin launches

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 12, 11:19 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-12 11:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, FDV)
PumpSwap price and pair data
Hourly OHLC candle data (4 most recent candles)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 4 hourly OHLC candles were available, providing minimal historical context for technical analysis
No holder distribution or whale concentration data was available (holder endpoints unavailable)
No sniper wallet data was available, preventing assessment of early-buyer/insider concentration or PnL
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, verification, and mutability status were all listed as unknown, preventing a definitive rug-risk determination
Token metadata (name, symbol, description, social links) is creator-supplied and untrusted; the 'Pokémon' branding and Twitter link were treated as unverified claims, not facts

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, much of which is incomplete (holder data, sniper data, and authority status are unavailable/unknown). The token exhibits extreme volatility and very shallow liquidity typical of high-risk speculative assets. Users should conduct their own independent research and verify authority/rug-risk status directly on-chain before making any investment decision. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in newly launched low-liquidity tokens, carry a high risk of total loss.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Pokémon a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Pokémon?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Pokémon ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Pokémon?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Pokémon liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-12 11:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $271,717.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Pokémon (Pokémon)?

Is Pokémon a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; not appropriate for conservative investors or those seeking exposure based on fundamentals, given the near-total absence of holder, sniper, and authority verification data combined with extreme, very recent volatility.

What are the key risks of holding Pokémon?

Extremely thin liquidity ($271.72K) relative to $40.98M FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Unknown mint/freeze authority status prevents ruling out supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer • No holder distribution or sniper data available, eliminating visibility into concentration and insider dump risk