Pokémon

Pokémon Price Today & AI Analysis

Pokémon
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Sep 12, 2026

Awo91Xpy8ojenaUojdbuLKV2ZfLYAr3tE4XLzj5Hpump

$0.0410

+95586.62%

FDV $40,979,056

LiveContract:Awo91Xpy8ojenaUojdbuLKV2ZfLYAr3tE4XLzj5HpumpChain:SolanaHolders:2,611Market cap:$40,979,056

More tokens on Solana

KET

KET

KET

$0.0048153.6%
MC $4.81M
MADE

MADE

SelfMade by SP3ND

$0.0013222.1%
MC $1.30M
ZDOG

ZDOG

Anonymous Dog

$0.00048929.4%
MC $483.5K
Bonk

Bonk

Bonk

$0.0526676.7%
MC $234.68M
$WIF

$WIF

dogwifhat

$0.19054.2%
MC $190.32M
STONK

STONK

STONK

$0.303648.5%
MC $258.92M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Pokémon

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Sep 12, 11:19 AM
FDV

$40,979,056

Liquidity

$271,717

Holders

0

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Pokémon (Awo91Xpy8ojenaUojdbuLKV2ZfLYAr3tE4XLzj5Hpump) is a PumpSwap-listed token that has gone parabolic in the last 4 hours, rising from roughly $0.0000418 to $0.041 (a reported 24h change of ~95,586%, which reflects its extremely recent launch/price discovery rather than a sustained trend). FDV sits at ~$41M against only ~$271.7K of total liquidity, an extremely thin liquidity-to-valuation ratio typical of freshly launched pump.fun-style tokens. Trading is dominated by buy pressure (91.4% buy vs 8.6% sell over 24h) with over 1,300 unique buyers, but the token has no holder distribution data, no sniper data, and unclear authority status, all of which materially limit confidence in any risk or valuation conclusion.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Neutral
Uses the 'Pokémon' name/branding, which is a third-party IP and not an officially affiliated project — a naming/trademark and adversarial-labeling red flag
Extreme, likely launch-phase price action (candles show O:0.0000418 -> C:0.041 in ~4 hours) rather than organic multi-day trend
Very thin liquidity (~$271.7K) relative to $41M FDV, implying high slippage and fragility
No holder or sniper data available from upstream sources, creating a significant analytical blind spot

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term

neutral
1-24 hours

Price has expanded roughly 100x within the last 4 hourly candles on thin liquidity, with the most recent candle showing deceleration (high 0.04098, close 0.04098, versus the prior candle's much larger range). 5m change (+2.6%) is far smaller than the 1h change (+40.7%), suggesting momentum may be cooling from its most explosive phase. Given the shallow $271.7K liquidity pool, sharp reversals or wicks in either direction are likely.

Target low$0.028
Target high$0.055
Support: $0.0374 (candle 3 open / candle 4 low), $0.0259 (candle 2 close), $0.0250 (candle 1 close)
Resistance: $0.0410 (candle 4 high/close, current level), psychological $0.05

Medium term

neutral
3-14 days

With only 4 hourly candles of history, there is no meaningful medium-term trend to project. Tokens that spike this violently on pump.fun/PumpSwap-style launches frequently either continue a short squeeze into a local top followed by a sharp retracement, or fade quickly once early buyers take profit. Sustained appreciation would require continued new buyer inflow (currently strong at 1,385 buyers vs 1,121 sellers) and liquidity growth beyond the current thin $271.7K base.

Catalysts
  • Continued organic buyer inflow / social virality (Twitter link present)
  • Liquidity additions that reduce slippage risk and attract larger holders
  • Potential loss of momentum leading to profit-taking cascade given no visible holder lockups or vesting data
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status could resolve into either a rug-pull risk realization or confidence-building renouncement news

Bullish factors

  • Strong 24h buy pressure at 91.4% of volume with 1,385 unique buyers outnumbering 1,121 sellers
  • Rapid price appreciation across all 4 available candles with higher highs and higher closes each hour
  • Twitter/social presence suggests active community promotion driving buy-side demand

Bearish factors

  • Liquidity of only ~$271.7K versus a $41M FDV is extremely shallow, meaning even moderate sell orders could crash price
  • 24h % change of ~95,586% strongly signals a brand-new, unproven token in an unstable price-discovery phase rather than sustainable growth
  • No data on mint/freeze authority, holder concentration, or sniper wallets — inability to rule out rug-pull or insider dump risk
  • 5m momentum (+2.6%) is much weaker than 1h momentum (+40.7%), a possible sign of decelerating buying interest
Confidence: low. Only 4 hourly candles are available, holder and sniper data are entirely absent, and authority/verification metadata is unknown. The extreme and very recent price move makes any projection highly speculative; confidence is low.

Pokémon call history

Full track record →
Sep 12neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Across the 4 available hourly candles, price moved from an opening low of $0.0000418629 to a close of $0.0409820, representing a near-vertical, low-timeframe uptrend. Candle 1 shows an enormous range (O:0.0000419 -> C:0.02506), effectively a launch/price-discovery candle with volume of $210.3K. Candle 2 was a narrow-range consolidation ($0.02506-$0.02584, V:$10.0K). Candle 3 broke out again with a strong bullish body (O:0.02584 -> C:0.03739, V:$80.6K). Candle 4 continued higher but with a much smaller range and lower volume ($0.03739 -> $0.04098, V:$22.3K), suggesting the initial explosive momentum is tapering.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
uptrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 91%Sell 9%

All 4 candles printed higher highs and higher closes, forming a clean short-term uptrend since the token's apparent launch. However, the pattern of decreasing volume on the last two candles relative to the initial breakout raises the possibility of a stalling or consolidating uptrend.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0374 (candle 3/4 open-low zone)
Major$0.0250-$0.0259 (candle 1-2 close zone)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0410 (current all-time high, candle 4 close)
Major$0.0500 (psychological round number above current highs)

With only 4 candles of history, support/resistance levels are provisional. The clearest support band sits at $0.0250-$0.0259 where price consolidated in candle 2 before its second breakout; a break below $0.0374 (candle 3/4 boundary) would signal a retest of that lower band. Resistance is effectively the current all-time high near $0.041, with no historical rejection data above that level.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic launch candle (candle 1) followed by a tight consolidation bar (candle 2) — a classic 'flagging' pattern after an initial pump
  • Second breakout candle (candle 3) with a wide bullish body and high volume, followed by a smaller-bodied continuation candle (candle 4) with falling volume — potential early exhaustion signal
  • Sequential higher highs and higher closes across all 4 candles indicate short-term bullish structure despite waning volume

Liquidity$271.72K
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$287.27K (91.4% of volume, 4,958 buys)
Sell$27.11K (8.6% of volume, 2,120 sells)
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers1,385
Unique sellers1,121

Total liquidity of just ~$271.7K against a $40.98M fully diluted valuation is extremely shallow — a ratio of roughly 0.66%, meaning even moderately sized trades could produce significant price impact/slippage. However, 24h flow is heavily skewed toward buying: $287.27K in buy volume vs only $27.11K in sell volume (net inflow of ~$260K), and unique buyers (1,385) outnumber unique sellers (1,121). This buy-dominant flow is consistent with the token's rapid price appreciation, but the thin liquidity base means this dynamic could reverse violently if sentiment shifts or large holders exit.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,927,782.73 tokens
FDV$40,979,056

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Update authority, mint authority, freeze authority, mutability, verification status, and 'possible spam' flags are all listed as unknown in the provided metadata. This is a significant gap: without confirmation that mint/freeze authorities are renounced, there is no way to rule out the possibility of arbitrary supply inflation or account freezing by the token deployer. Total supply is ~999.93M tokens with a $40.98M FDV at the current $0.04098 price. The token trades under the name/symbol 'Pokémon,' which references a well-known third-party media franchise; this branding was supplied by the token creator and is a common pattern in speculative meme-coin launches that appropriate recognizable IP without affiliation, which itself is a risk signal rather than a fundamental attribute.

Volatility
high

Price moved from $0.0000419 to $0.0410 within 4 hourly candles (~95,586% reported 24h change), and 1h change alone was +40.7%. This is extreme volatility typical of brand-new low-liquidity launches.

Liquidity
high

Only ~$271.72K in total liquidity against a $40.98M FDV creates a very high risk of slippage and price manipulation; large trades can move the market significantly.

Concentration
high

No holder or whale distribution data is available, but given the token's very recent launch and thin liquidity, concentration among early buyers/deployer wallets should be assumed elevated until verified. Absence of data is itself a risk factor, not a mitigant.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available to rule out coordinated early-buyer dumping. Given the parabolic price action and thin liquidity, the risk of sniper or insider sell pressure crashing price cannot be assessed and should be treated with caution.

Authority
high

Update authority, mint authority renouncement, and freeze authority renouncement are all listed as unknown. Without confirmation of renouncement, the deployer could theoretically mint additional supply or freeze accounts, which is a material rug-pull risk factor.

Key risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($271.72K) relative to $40.98M FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status prevents ruling out supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer
  • No holder distribution or sniper data available, eliminating visibility into concentration and insider dump risk
  • Parabolic, launch-phase price action (~95,586% 24h) is inherently unstable and prone to sharp reversals
  • Use of 'Pokémon' branding (a well-known third-party IP) without any verified affiliation is a common pattern in opportunistic/meme-coin token launches

Mitigating factors

  • Strong current buy-side flow with 91.4% buy volume and more unique buyers (1,385) than sellers (1,121) over 24h
  • Presence of a social (Twitter) link suggests some level of community/marketing activity
  • Consistent higher-highs pattern across all 4 available candles suggests, for now, sustained buyer interest rather than an immediate collapse
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; not appropriate for conservative investors or those seeking exposure based on fundamentals, given the near-total absence of holder, sniper, and authority verification data combined with extreme, very recent volatility.

Pokémon (Awo91Xpy...) is an extremely fresh, high-volatility PumpSwap token that has surged ~95,586% over the reported 24h window on thin liquidity ($271.72K) and strong but narrow buy-side flow. The setup has classic hallmarks of a pump.fun-style meme launch: minimal verifiable fundamentals (unknown authorities, no holder/sniper data), aggressive early price action, and appropriation of well-known third-party IP branding. Any position here is a high-risk speculative bet on continued momentum and marketing/virality rather than a fundamentals-driven investment.

Bull case (low)

Continued viral momentum and buyer inflow push the token to new highs above the current $0.041 level, with liquidity deepening as market cap grows, potentially attracting further speculative capital rotation from meme-coin traders.

  • Sustained 91.4% buy-volume dominance and buyer count exceeding sellers over the last 24h
  • Active social media promotion (Twitter presence) that could go further viral given the recognizable 'Pokémon' branding
  • Pattern of higher highs across all available candles signaling short-term bullish structure

Base case

Price consolidates or experiences a moderate pullback from current levels ($0.041) as the initial launch-phase volatility subsides, trading within the $0.025-$0.05 range while the market digests the token's viability absent fundamental verification.

  • No major liquidity injection or authority-renouncement confirmation occurs in the near term
  • Buy/sell flow remains roughly balanced to slightly buy-favored, consistent with current 91.4%/8.6% split
  • No confirmed rug-pull or mass insider dump occurs, but normal profit-taking from early buyers gradually increases sell pressure

Bear case (high)

The parabolic move exhausts quickly, sniper/insider or early-buyer wallets (unverifiable due to lack of data) dump into the thin liquidity pool, causing a sharp price collapse similar to many pump.fun launches that spike and then crash within hours to days.

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($271.72K) relative to $40.98M FDV magnifies downside price impact from even modest selling
  • Declining volume on the most recent candle despite continued price increase, a possible early exhaustion/divergence signal
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of deployer-side rug-pull actions
  • Use of unaffiliated third-party IP ('Pokémon') is a recurring pattern in short-lived speculative meme-coin launches

GeneratedSep 12, 11:19 AM
Data freshnessPrice and candle data current as of the most recent hourly candle (2026-09-12T11:00:00Z); analytics reflect trailing 24h window as provided.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, FDV)
  • PumpSwap price and pair data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (4 most recent candles)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 4 hourly OHLC candles were available, providing minimal historical context for technical analysis
  • No holder distribution or whale concentration data was available (holder endpoints unavailable)
  • No sniper wallet data was available, preventing assessment of early-buyer/insider concentration or PnL
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, verification, and mutability status were all listed as unknown, preventing a definitive rug-risk determination
  • Token metadata (name, symbol, description, social links) is creator-supplied and untrusted; the 'Pokémon' branding and Twitter link were treated as unverified claims, not facts

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, much of which is incomplete (holder data, sniper data, and authority status are unavailable/unknown). The token exhibits extreme volatility and very shallow liquidity typical of high-risk speculative assets. Users should conduct their own independent research and verify authority/rug-risk status directly on-chain before making any investment decision. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in newly launched low-liquidity tokens, carry a high risk of total loss.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,927,782.73 tokens

Key Risks

•Extremely thin liquidity ($271.72K) relative to $40.98M FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
•Unknown mint/freeze authority status prevents ruling out supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer
•No holder distribution or sniper data available, eliminating visibility into concentration and insider dump risk
•Parabolic, launch-phase price action (~95,586% 24h) is inherently unstable and prone to sharp reversals

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper wallet data was provided for this token, so it is not possible to assess early-buyer concentration, PnL positioning, or sell-through behavior from sniper cohorts. This is a meaningful blind spot for a token exhibiting such an extreme, fresh price spike, since sniper/insider dumping is a common risk in these scenarios.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

unknown - no sniper data available

Unknown directly, but aggregate 24h trading data shows a favorable buyer/seller ratio (1,385 unique buyers vs 1,121 unique sellers, and 4,958 buys vs 2,120 sells), implying net positive sentiment among broader market participants even though sniper-specific behavior cannot be isolated.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Pokémon (Pokémon)?

Price has expanded roughly 100x within the last 4 hourly candles on thin liquidity, with the most recent candle showing deceleration (high 0.04098, close 0.04098, versus the prior candle's much larger range). 5m change (+2.6%) is far smaller than the 1h change (+40.7%), suggesting momentum may be cooling from its most explosive phase. Given the shallow $271.7K liquidity pool, sharp reversals or wicks in either direction are likely. Short-term outlook is neutral (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.028 to $0.055.

Is Pokémon a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; not appropriate for conservative investors or those seeking exposure based on fundamentals, given the near-total absence of holder, sniper, and authority verification data combined with extreme, very recent volatility.

What does sniper activity look like for Pokémon?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding Pokémon?

Extremely thin liquidity ($271.72K) relative to $40.98M FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Unknown mint/freeze authority status prevents ruling out supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer • No holder distribution or sniper data available, eliminating visibility into concentration and insider dump risk

← Back to all predictions

Track Pokémon