Backpacknami

Backpacknami-chan Price Today & AI Analysis

BackpacknamiSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 27, 2026

Price

$0.000146

+182.61% 24h

Contract

Live
AuqagzhTqC6uBLraRb3rx2fwCCBAXCmfRm4btemyPXJb

Chain

Solana

Holders

701

Market cap

$146,116

More tokens on Solana

DBRDBRdeBridge$0.0225+2.3%MC $225.35MRAYRAYRaydium$2.07-2.1%MC $1.15BPEACHYPEACHYPeachy Keenan$0.045222+6.2%MC $50.3Kooo$0.000973+1962.5%MC $972.9KAROSAROSAROS$6.33+56.0%MC $6.33Be/acce/accEffective Accelerationism$0.0126+706.8%MC $12.43M

Backpacknami-chan: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-27 13:15 UTC

Holder addresses

701

Top 10 supply share

37.76%

Reported liquidity

$19,173.00
How concentrated is Backpacknami-chan ownership?
As of 2026-09-27 13:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 37.76% of supply. It reports 701 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Backpacknami-chan?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-27 13:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $600,802.00 in buys and $580,064.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Backpacknami-chan liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -25.20%, from $25,634.25 (2026-09-27 11:00 UTC) to $19,175.11 (2026-09-27 13:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-27 13:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-27 11:00 UTC$25,634.25
2026-09-27 12:00 UTC$12,929.56
2026-09-27 13:00 UTC$19,175.11

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about Backpacknami

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 27, 01:16 PM UTC

FDV

$146,116

Liquidity

$19,173.00

Holders

701

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Backpacknami-chan (Backpacknami) is a micro-cap Solana meme token trading on a single Raydium CPMM pool with a mint of AuqagzhTqC6uBLraRb3rx2fwCCBAXCmfRm4btemyPXJb. It has an FDV of ~$146K, total liquidity of only ~$19.17K, and has experienced extreme intraday volatility (24h price change of +182.6%, but a 5m move of -24.4%). The token shows classic hallmarks of a newly-launched, thinly-traded meme coin: violent hourly candle swings, high churn in buy/sell counts, and unverifiable contract/authority status. No holder history, wallet classification, or sniper coverage is available, which significantly limits confidence in any distribution or smart-money read.

Key points

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$19.17K) relative to FDV (~$146K), implying high slippage and fragility
  • 24h price move of +182.6% coupled with a violent intra-hour reversal pattern (candle 1 spiked ~47x intra-candle then collapsed)
  • Contract verification, mint/freeze authority, and mutability status are all unknown — a material transparency gap
  • No sniper or holder-history data available, preventing any assessment of early-buyer behavior or distribution trend
  • Top-10 holders control ~37.8% of supply out of only 701 total holder addresses, a fairly concentrated base for a token this small

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

The most recent three hourly candles show a whipsaw pattern: an extreme spike from ~$0.0000071 to $0.000339 then a violent collapse to $0.0000518, followed by a bounce back to $0.000146. This is consistent with a low-liquidity pool being pushed by a handful of large trades rather than organic demand. Given the -24.4% move in just the last 5 minutes, downside continuation risk is elevated, but the thin liquidity also means sharp bounces are equally possible in either direction.

Target low

$0.0000658

Target high

$0.000270

Support

$0.0000658 (candle 3 low), $0.0000517 (candle 2 low)

Resistance

$0.000269 (candle 1/2 high cluster), $0.000339 (candle 1 high, all-time high in sample)

Medium term · 3-7 days

bearish

Absent verified authority renouncement, deep liquidity, or holder growth data, medium-term sustainability is speculative. Meme tokens with this liquidity-to-FDV ratio and volatility profile frequently mean-revert toward liquidity-pool-implied fair value as early participants take profits, unless sustained volume and liquidity additions occur.

Catalysts

  • Potential liquidity additions or removals from the Raydium CPMM pool
  • Continued social/twitter-driven attention given the single listed social link
  • Any on-chain confirmation (or lack thereof) of mint/freeze authority status could sharply reprice risk perception
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market sentiment

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume ($600.80K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($580.06K), a 50.9%/49.1% split indicating marginal net buy pressure
  • 24h buyer count (3,023) exceeds seller count (2,627), suggesting more unique participants are entering than exiting
  • 24h price change is strongly positive (+182.6%) over the full day despite recent pullback

Bearish factors

  • Total liquidity of just ~$19.17K is extremely shallow relative to $146.12K FDV, making the price highly manipulable and prone to slippage
  • 5m price change is -24.4%, showing an active reversal in progress at the time of the snapshot
  • Candle data shows a violent pump-and-dump pattern within a single hour (open $0.0000071 to high $0.000339 to close $0.000269, then crushed to $0.0000518 the next hour)
  • Contract verification, spam flag, mutability, and update authority are all unknown, offering no reassurance against rug/mint risk

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles are available, sniper and holder-history data are absent, and authority/verification status is entirely unknown. The extreme, possibly manipulated-looking price action (47x intra-candle spike) further reduces confidence in any directional call.

Backpacknami call history

Full track record →

Sep 27neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
Auqagz...PXJb
Total Supply
999,999,363.79

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$19.17K) relative to FDV and trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Violent, pump-and-dump-like price action across the available 3-hour candle sample
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out future dilution or account freezing
  • No sniper data available to assess early-buyer dump risk despite a price pattern consistent with sniper-driven volatility

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (11:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000715, spiked to a high of $0.000339 (a ~47x intra-candle move), then closed at $0.000269 — a massive wick suggesting a sharp pump followed by partial profit-taking, on volume of ~$694.8K. Candle 2 (12:00 UTC) opened at the prior close ($0.000269), barely ticked up to $0.000269 high, then collapsed to a low of $0.0000518 before closing at $0.0000667 — a bearish reversal/dump candle erasing most of candle 1's gains, on volume of ~$416.1K. Candle 3 (13:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000667, rallied to a high of $0.000258, then pulled back to close at $0.000146 — a partial recovery on lighter volume (~$88.7K), leaving price roughly in the middle of the prior range.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price action is dominated by a sharp pump-then-dump sequence (candle 1 to candle 2), with a partial recovery in candle 3 that still closes well below the candle 1 close and high. Medium-term (across the 3-candle sample) price is oscillating within a wide range roughly between $0.0000517 and $0.000339, without a clear sustained directional trend — effectively sideways-to-volatile chop at the macro level despite the large percentage swings.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000658 (candle 3 low)

Major support

$0.0000517 (candle 2 low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000269 (candle 1 close / candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.000339 (candle 1 high)

With only 3 candles of data, these levels are provisional. The $0.0000517-$0.0000658 zone has acted as a floor across the last two candles, while the $0.000269-$0.000339 zone has repeatedly capped upside. A sustained break above $0.000339 or below $0.0000517 would signal a new directional move, but given the extremely limited sample size this should be treated as a rough guide only.

Notable patterns

  • Large upper-wick spike candle (candle 1) resembling a pump-and-dump / possible wash-trading wick
  • Bearish reversal candle following the spike (candle 2), erasing most gains
  • Partial recovery / indecision candle (candle 3) closing mid-range
  • Declining volume across the 3-candle sequence, suggesting fading momentum

Liquidity

Liquidity

$19,173.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of only ~$19.17K against a 24h trading volume north of $1.18M combined (buy + sell) is a stark mismatch — implying the pool is being turned over dozens of times per day, which is a strong indicator of high slippage risk and susceptibility to sharp price manipulation on relatively modest trade sizes. Buy volume ($600.80K) marginally exceeds sell volume ($580.06K), a slight net inflow, and unique buyers (3,023) outnumber unique sellers (2,627), which is a mildly positive signal on participation breadth. However, given the FDV of $146.12K is roughly 7.6x total liquidity, even modest sell pressure could cause outsized price impact. This liquidity profile is characteristic of a fragile, early-stage meme token rather than an established, liquid market.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,363.79

FDV

$146,116

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +182.6%, 1h change of +43.7%, and 5m change of -24.4% demonstrate extreme, whipsaw-like volatility. The 3-candle OHLC sample shows a ~47x intra-candle spike followed by an ~85% collapse and partial recovery within just three hours.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only ~$19.17K against $146.12K FDV and over $1.18M in combined 24h volume, indicating the pool can be moved dramatically by modest-sized trades and that exiting a meaningful position could incur severe slippage.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top 10 holders control ~37.76% of supply across 701 total holder addresses. This is a moderate concentration level for a micro-cap token, though top-100 concentration and any wallet classification (team, exchange, LP) are unavailable, limiting the precision of this assessment.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$19.17K) relative to FDV and trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Violent, pump-and-dump-like price action across the available 3-hour candle sample
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out future dilution or account freezing
  • No sniper data available to assess early-buyer dump risk despite a price pattern consistent with sniper-driven volatility
  • Moderate holder concentration (top 10 = 37.76%) with no visibility into who those holders are
  • Unverified contract status and unknown spam classification

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buyer count (3,023) modestly exceeds seller count (2,627), suggesting broad-based retail participation rather than a single dominant seller
  • 24h buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume (50.9% vs 49.1%), indicating marginal net demand over the trailing day
  • 701 distinct holder addresses suggests supply is not held by an extremely small handful of wallets, though this alone does not confirm decentralization

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total loss. It is not appropriate for risk-averse investors, those seeking stable or predictable returns, or anyone unable to actively monitor extremely volatile positions. Given the unknown authority status and absent sniper/holder-history data, standard due diligence checks cannot currently be completed.

Backpacknami-chan is an ultra-high-risk, low-liquidity Solana meme token exhibiting classic early-stage volatility and data-transparency gaps. The name references a Backpack (wallet/exchange) co-founder association per its description, which may drive social-media-fueled speculative interest, but this claim is unverified and originates from the token's own (untrusted) description field. Any investment thesis here is almost purely speculative and short-term momentum-driven rather than fundamentals-driven, given the near-total absence of verifiable tokenomics and holder-history data.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If social attention around the 'Backpack Co-founder' association intensifies (per the single Twitter link) and buy-side momentum continues to modestly outpace sell-side (as seen in the 50.9%/49.1% 24h split and higher buyer count), the token could see further speculative pumps similar to the +182.6% 24h move, especially given how thin liquidity amplifies both upside and downside moves.

  • Continued or renewed social media/Twitter-driven hype
  • Net positive buyer count and marginal net buy volume in the 24h window
  • Low absolute price and high float could attract momentum/gamba traders chasing volatility

Base Case

Price continues to chop within the observed $0.0000517–$0.000339 range with high volatility and no clear sustained trend, as thin liquidity causes exaggerated moves in both directions without strong conviction from either buyers or sellers overall.

  • No major liquidity injection or withdrawal occurs in the near term
  • Social/hype cycle neither meaningfully accelerates nor completely dies out
  • No confirmed rug event (mint/freeze exploit) occurs, though this cannot be ruled out given unknown authority status

Bear Case

High probability

The pump-and-dump pattern visible in the 3-candle sample (spike to $0.000339 then crash to $0.0000517) repeats or extends, especially if early holders or unidentified snipers exit into the shallow $19.17K liquidity pool, causing severe price impact and potential liquidity withdrawal.

  • Extremely shallow liquidity relative to trading volume and FDV
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open dilution or freeze risk
  • Unverified contract and unknown spam classification
  • Declining hourly volume trend (from $694.8K to $88.7K) suggesting fading initial hype
  • No sniper visibility despite price action consistent with bot-driven volatility

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 27, 01:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-27 13:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint, symbol, supply, description)
  • USD price and 24h/1h/5m percentage change data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent candles, Raydium CPMM pool 9y2Qvwh9oTJXEtiY1hTSc1R768fV5VdUjrPgbssSyjpA)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers, total liquidity, FDV)
  • Sniper analysis feed (returned no data)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count and top-10 concentration only)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were available, severely limiting technical trend analysis
  • No sniper wallet data was available at all, preventing any smart-money or dump-risk assessment
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available; only a current snapshot holder count and top-10 concentration were provided
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, spam classification, and mutability status were all unknown, preventing a genuine rug-risk assessment
  • Top-100 holder concentration and any wallet classification/labeling data were unavailable
  • Token description and social claims (e.g., 'Backpack Co-founder' association) are unverified, creator-supplied, untrusted claims and were not treated as factual

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided at the time of analysis, much of which is incomplete or unavailable (notably sniper data, holder history, and authority checks). Cryptocurrency, and especially micro-cap meme tokens with shallow liquidity, carry an extremely high risk of substantial or total loss. Conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Backpacknami-chan ownership?

As of 2026-09-27 13:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 37.76% of supply. It reports 701 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Backpacknami-chan?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-27 13:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $600,802.00 in buys and $580,064.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Backpacknami-chan liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -25.20%, from $25,634.25 (2026-09-27 11:00 UTC) to $19,175.11 (2026-09-27 13:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Backpacknami-chan (Backpacknami)?

The most recent three hourly candles show a whipsaw pattern: an extreme spike from ~$0.0000071 to $0.000339 then a violent collapse to $0.0000518, followed by a bounce back to $0.000146. This is consistent with a low-liquidity pool being pushed by a handful of large trades rather than organic demand. Given the -24.4% move in just the last 5 minutes, downside continuation risk is elevated, but the thin liquidity also means sharp bounces are equally possible in either direction. Short-term outlook is neutral (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000658 to $0.000270.

Is Backpacknami a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total loss. It is not appropriate for risk-averse investors, those seeking stable or predictable returns, or anyone unable to actively monitor extremely volatile positions. Given the unknown authority status and absent sniper/holder-history data, standard due diligence checks cannot currently be completed.

What are the key risks of holding Backpacknami?

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$19.17K) relative to FDV and trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Violent, pump-and-dump-like price action across the available 3-hour candle sample • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out future dilution or account freezing

← Back to all predictions

Track Backpacknami