How concentrated is Backpacknami-chan ownership?

As of 2026-09-27 13:15 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 37.76% of supply, out of 701 holder addresses.

Are large holders selling Backpacknami-chan?

In the 24 hours to 2026-09-27 13:15 UTC, DEX buys were $600,802.00 and sells $580,064.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.

Is Backpacknami-chan liquidity falling?

Liquidity fell 25.20%, from $25,634.25 (2026-09-27 11:00 UTC) to $19,175.11 (2026-09-27 13:00 UTC).

Backpacknami-chan Price Today & AI Analysis

BackpacknamiSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 27, 2026

$0.0₅2287

-2.09% 24h

Contract

Live

AuqagzhTqC6uBLraRb3rx2fwCCBAXCmfRm4btemyPXJb

Chain

Solana

Holders

193

Market cap

$2,286

At a $1M market cap, $BACKPACKNAMI would be $0.001000 (437x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is Backpacknami a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 8

Transfer fee

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 1% fee and the owner can still raise it.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

1%Every buy and sell · can be raised

Launch wallets hold

2.1%2 bundlers, 3 insiders still holding

The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about Backpacknami

3 free answers a day

Backpacknami-chan: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-09-27 13:15 UTC

Holder addresses

701

Top 10 supply share

37.76%

Reported liquidity

$19,173.00

How concentrated is Backpacknami-chan ownership?: As of 2026-09-27 13:15 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 37.76% of supply, out of 701 holder addresses.
Are large holders selling Backpacknami-chan?: In the 24 hours to 2026-09-27 13:15 UTC, DEX buys were $600,802.00 and sells $580,064.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.
Is Backpacknami-chan liquidity falling?: Liquidity fell 25.20%, from $25,634.25 (2026-09-27 11:00 UTC) to $19,175.11 (2026-09-27 13:00 UTC).

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Unhosted token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-27 13:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)	Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-27 11:00 UTC	$25,634.25
2026-09-27 12:00 UTC	$12,929.56
2026-09-27 13:00 UTC	$19,175.11

A liquidity change compares the first and last samples, which may be less than 24 hours apart. USD liquidity also moves with asset prices, not only with deposits and withdrawals.

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

2026-09-27 13:15 UTCBuy · $63.584Y7oxZni…cQCTs3Wallet 45fxb9HK…LW8s7z
2026-09-27 13:15 UTCBuy · $121.825qDRjq6B…N7fBy4Wallet 8z6echJS…Zz5X3Z
2026-09-27 13:15 UTCBuy · $99.585q6BHyaK…6zfU61Wallet DJ9mXhKU…dMZGxa
2026-09-27 13:15 UTCBuy · $99.082rUxyCWm…hhtMUXWallet FjSpvAEV…FSWvmx
2026-09-27 13:15 UTCBuy · $2.434VERBMaq…6DR7fsWallet 6NJojUNd…YngrH3
2026-09-27 13:15 UTCBuy · $49.755CQoiogm…9C2GWAWallet 9RYrWXhL…VG1SsH
2026-09-27 13:15 UTCBuy · $9.80uFnP7eQV…8CnouxWallet 79brkGeE…w34V5n
2026-09-27 13:15 UTCBuy · $16.545JHtFoqG…XFeuaSWallet DLQdX4zb…HJUR4a
2026-09-27 13:15 UTCBuy · $13.872CDVN7H1…Ve8j5EWallet 4WHNgNkv…eci29M
2026-09-27 13:15 UTCBuy · $99.002vtAEpk7…DpBX7rWallet BCVpubM3…MBLoQX

Report snapshot

as of Sep 27, 01:16 PM UTC

FDV

$146,116

Liquidity

$19,173.00

Holders

701

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Backpacknami-chan (Backpacknami) is a micro-cap Solana meme token trading on a single Raydium CPMM pool with a mint of AuqagzhTqC6uBLraRb3rx2fwCCBAXCmfRm4btemyPXJb. It has an FDV of ~$146K, total liquidity of only ~$19.17K, and has experienced extreme intraday volatility (24h price change of +182.6%, but a 5m move of -24.4%). The token shows classic hallmarks of a newly-launched, thinly-traded meme coin: violent hourly candle swings, high churn in buy/sell counts, and unverifiable contract/authority status. No holder history, wallet classification, or sniper coverage is available, which significantly limits confidence in any distribution or smart-money read.

Key points

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$19.17K) relative to FDV (~$146K), implying high slippage and fragility
24h price move of +182.6% coupled with a violent intra-hour reversal pattern (candle 1 spiked ~47x intra-candle then collapsed)
Contract verification, mint/freeze authority, and mutability status are all unknown — a material transparency gap
No sniper or holder-history data available, preventing any assessment of early-buyer behavior or distribution trend
Top-10 holders control ~37.8% of supply out of only 701 total holder addresses, a fairly concentrated base for a token this small

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

The most recent three hourly candles show a whipsaw pattern: an extreme spike from ~$0.0000071 to $0.000339 then a violent collapse to $0.0000518, followed by a bounce back to $0.000146. This is consistent with a low-liquidity pool being pushed by a handful of large trades rather than organic demand. Given the -24.4% move in just the last 5 minutes, downside continuation risk is elevated, but the thin liquidity also means sharp bounces are equally possible in either direction.

Target low

$0.0000658

Target high

$0.000270

Support: $0.0000658 (candle 3 low), $0.0000517 (candle 2 low)
Resistance: $0.000269 (candle 1/2 high cluster), $0.000339 (candle 1 high, all-time high in sample)

Medium term · 3-7 days

bearish

Absent verified authority renouncement, deep liquidity, or holder growth data, medium-term sustainability is speculative. Meme tokens with this liquidity-to-FDV ratio and volatility profile frequently mean-revert toward liquidity-pool-implied fair value as early participants take profits, unless sustained volume and liquidity additions occur.

Catalysts

Potential liquidity additions or removals from the Raydium CPMM pool
Continued social/twitter-driven attention given the single listed social link
Any on-chain confirmation (or lack thereof) of mint/freeze authority status could sharply reprice risk perception
Broader Solana meme-coin market sentiment

Bullish factors

24h buy volume ($600.80K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($580.06K), a 50.9%/49.1% split indicating marginal net buy pressure
24h buyer count (3,023) exceeds seller count (2,627), suggesting more unique participants are entering than exiting
24h price change is strongly positive (+182.6%) over the full day despite recent pullback

Bearish factors

Total liquidity of just ~$19.17K is extremely shallow relative to $146.12K FDV, making the price highly manipulable and prone to slippage
5m price change is -24.4%, showing an active reversal in progress at the time of the snapshot
Candle data shows a violent pump-and-dump pattern within a single hour (open $0.0000071 to high $0.000339 to close $0.000269, then crushed to $0.0000518 the next hour)
Contract verification, spam flag, mutability, and update authority are all unknown, offering no reassurance against rug/mint risk

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles are available, sniper and holder-history data are absent, and authority/verification status is entirely unknown. The extreme, possibly manipulated-looking price action (47x intra-candle spike) further reduces confidence in any directional call.

Backpacknami call history

Full track record →

Sep 27neutral@ $0.000146

24h—

7d—

30d-97.7%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: Auqagz...PXJb
Total Supply: 999,999,363.79

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$19.17K) relative to FDV and trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Violent, pump-and-dump-like price action across the available 3-hour candle sample
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out future dilution or account freezing
No sniper data available to assess early-buyer dump risk despite a price pattern consistent with sniper-driven volatility

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (11:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000715, spiked to a high of $0.000339 (a ~47x intra-candle move), then closed at $0.000269 — a massive wick suggesting a sharp pump followed by partial profit-taking, on volume of ~$694.8K. Candle 2 (12:00 UTC) opened at the prior close ($0.000269), barely ticked up to $0.000269 high, then collapsed to a low of $0.0000518 before closing at $0.0000667 — a bearish reversal/dump candle erasing most of candle 1's gains, on volume of ~$416.1K. Candle 3 (13:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000667, rallied to a high of $0.000258, then pulled back to close at $0.000146 — a partial recovery on lighter volume (~$88.7K), leaving price roughly in the middle of the prior range.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price action is dominated by a sharp pump-then-dump sequence (candle 1 to candle 2), with a partial recovery in candle 3 that still closes well below the candle 1 close and high. Medium-term (across the 3-candle sample) price is oscillating within a wide range roughly between $0.0000517 and $0.000339, without a clear sustained directional trend — effectively sideways-to-volatile chop at the macro level despite the large percentage swings.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000658 (candle 3 low)

Major support

$0.0000517 (candle 2 low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000269 (candle 1 close / candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.000339 (candle 1 high)

With only 3 candles of data, these levels are provisional. The $0.0000517-$0.0000658 zone has acted as a floor across the last two candles, while the $0.000269-$0.000339 zone has repeatedly capped upside. A sustained break above $0.000339 or below $0.0000517 would signal a new directional move, but given the extremely limited sample size this should be treated as a rough guide only.

Notable patterns

Large upper-wick spike candle (candle 1) resembling a pump-and-dump / possible wash-trading wick
Bearish reversal candle following the spike (candle 2), erasing most gains
Partial recovery / indecision candle (candle 3) closing mid-range
Declining volume across the 3-candle sequence, suggesting fading momentum

Liquidity

$19,173.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of only ~$19.17K against a 24h trading volume north of $1.18M combined (buy + sell) is a stark mismatch — implying the pool is being turned over dozens of times per day, which is a strong indicator of high slippage risk and susceptibility to sharp price manipulation on relatively modest trade sizes. Buy volume ($600.80K) marginally exceeds sell volume ($580.06K), a slight net inflow, and unique buyers (3,023) outnumber unique sellers (2,627), which is a mildly positive signal on participation breadth. However, given the FDV of $146.12K is roughly 7.6x total liquidity, even modest sell pressure could cause outsized price impact. This liquidity profile is characteristic of a fragile, early-stage meme token rather than an established, liquid market.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,363.79

FDV

$146,116

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +182.6%, 1h change of +43.7%, and 5m change of -24.4% demonstrate extreme, whipsaw-like volatility. The 3-candle OHLC sample shows a ~47x intra-candle spike followed by an ~85% collapse and partial recovery within just three hours.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only ~$19.17K against $146.12K FDV and over $1.18M in combined 24h volume, indicating the pool can be moved dramatically by modest-sized trades and that exiting a meaningful position could incur severe slippage.
Concentrationmedium
Top 10 holders control ~37.76% of supply across 701 total holder addresses. This is a moderate concentration level for a micro-cap token, though top-100 concentration and any wallet classification (team, exchange, LP) are unavailable, limiting the precision of this assessment.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$19.17K) relative to FDV and trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Violent, pump-and-dump-like price action across the available 3-hour candle sample
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out future dilution or account freezing
No sniper data available to assess early-buyer dump risk despite a price pattern consistent with sniper-driven volatility
Moderate holder concentration (top 10 = 37.76%) with no visibility into who those holders are
Unverified contract status and unknown spam classification

Mitigating factors

24h buyer count (3,023) modestly exceeds seller count (2,627), suggesting broad-based retail participation rather than a single dominant seller
24h buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume (50.9% vs 49.1%), indicating marginal net demand over the trailing day
701 distinct holder addresses suggests supply is not held by an extremely small handful of wallets, though this alone does not confirm decentralization

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total loss. It is not appropriate for risk-averse investors, those seeking stable or predictable returns, or anyone unable to actively monitor extremely volatile positions. Given the unknown authority status and absent sniper/holder-history data, standard due diligence checks cannot currently be completed.

Backpacknami-chan is an ultra-high-risk, low-liquidity Solana meme token exhibiting classic early-stage volatility and data-transparency gaps. The name references a Backpack (wallet/exchange) co-founder association per its description, which may drive social-media-fueled speculative interest, but this claim is unverified and originates from the token's own (untrusted) description field. Any investment thesis here is almost purely speculative and short-term momentum-driven rather than fundamentals-driven, given the near-total absence of verifiable tokenomics and holder-history data.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If social attention around the 'Backpack Co-founder' association intensifies (per the single Twitter link) and buy-side momentum continues to modestly outpace sell-side (as seen in the 50.9%/49.1% 24h split and higher buyer count), the token could see further speculative pumps similar to the +182.6% 24h move, especially given how thin liquidity amplifies both upside and downside moves.

Continued or renewed social media/Twitter-driven hype
Net positive buyer count and marginal net buy volume in the 24h window
Low absolute price and high float could attract momentum/gamba traders chasing volatility

Base Case

Price continues to chop within the observed $0.0000517–$0.000339 range with high volatility and no clear sustained trend, as thin liquidity causes exaggerated moves in both directions without strong conviction from either buyers or sellers overall.

No major liquidity injection or withdrawal occurs in the near term
Social/hype cycle neither meaningfully accelerates nor completely dies out
No confirmed rug event (mint/freeze exploit) occurs, though this cannot be ruled out given unknown authority status

Bear Case

High probability

The pump-and-dump pattern visible in the 3-candle sample (spike to $0.000339 then crash to $0.0000517) repeats or extends, especially if early holders or unidentified snipers exit into the shallow $19.17K liquidity pool, causing severe price impact and potential liquidity withdrawal.

Extremely shallow liquidity relative to trading volume and FDV
Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open dilution or freeze risk
Unverified contract and unknown spam classification
Declining hourly volume trend (from $694.8K to $88.7K) suggesting fading initial hype
No sniper visibility despite price action consistent with bot-driven volatility

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 27, 01:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-27 13:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Token metadata (mint, symbol, supply, description)
USD price and 24h/1h/5m percentage change data
Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent candles, Raydium CPMM pool 9y2Qvwh9oTJXEtiY1hTSc1R768fV5VdUjrPgbssSyjpA)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers, total liquidity, FDV)
Sniper analysis feed (returned no data)
Unhosted holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count and top-10 concentration only)

Limitations

Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were available, severely limiting technical trend analysis
No sniper wallet data was available at all, preventing any smart-money or dump-risk assessment
No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available; only a current snapshot holder count and top-10 concentration were provided
Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, spam classification, and mutability status were all unknown, preventing a genuine rug-risk assessment
Top-100 holder concentration and any wallet classification/labeling data were unavailable
Token description and social claims (e.g., 'Backpack Co-founder' association) are unverified, creator-supplied, untrusted claims and were not treated as factual

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided at the time of analysis, much of which is incomplete or unavailable (notably sniper data, holder history, and authority checks). Cryptocurrency, and especially micro-cap meme tokens with shallow liquidity, carry an extremely high risk of substantial or total loss. Conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Backpacknami-chan (Backpacknami) a scam?

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 1% fee and the owner can still raise it. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Nov 8, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Backpacknami-chan (Backpacknami)?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 1% transfer fee, and the owner can still raise it. Checked Nov 8, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for Backpacknami-chan (Backpacknami)?

Is Backpacknami a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total loss. It is not appropriate for risk-averse investors, those seeking stable or predictable returns, or anyone unable to actively monitor extremely volatile positions. Given the unknown authority status and absent sniper/holder-history data, standard due diligence checks cannot currently be completed.

What are the key risks of holding Backpacknami?

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$19.17K) relative to FDV and trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Violent, pump-and-dump-like price action across the available 3-hour candle sample • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out future dilution or account freezing