Gemini

Google Gemini Price Today & AI Analysis

GeminiSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 21, 2026

Price

$0.091012

FDV $10

Contract

Live
Ad5HGcq7RxVELGxR9CdXG3kdiugAAXKWH4UXEc2UB2x6

Chain

Solana

Holders

32

Market cap

$10

More tokens on Solana

FLEXFLEXReflex Monster$0.001934+272.1%MC $1.86MPAIDPAIDPaid$0.0167-35.9%MC $16.05MZECZECZcash$1,465.42-6.6%MC $150.33MSPYXSPYXSP500 xStock$770.19+0.6%MC $73.35MCARDSCARDSCollector Crypt$0.1709-1.9%MC $337.82MJEANPHILJEANPHILJean Phil$0.003358+0.3%MC $3.26M

Google Gemini: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-21 03:45 UTC

Holder addresses

32

Top 10 supply share

19.84%

Reported liquidity

Not available
How concentrated is Google Gemini ownership?
As of 2026-09-21 03:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 19.84% of supply. It reports 32 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Google Gemini?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-21 03:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $0.00 in buys and $0.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Google Gemini liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -100.00%, from $141,124.62 (2026-09-20 19:00 UTC) to $0.02 (2026-09-20 22:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-21 03:45 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-20 19:00 UTC$141,124.62
2026-09-20 20:00 UTC$172,462.87
2026-09-20 21:00 UTC$0.02
2026-09-20 22:00 UTC$0.02

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about Gemini

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 21, 03:46 AM UTC

FDV

$10

Liquidity

Not available

Holders

32

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Google Gemini (Gemini) is a Solana token trading on a single Meteora DAMM pair with a fully diluted valuation of just $10.00 against a total supply of ~99.999 billion tokens. On-chain evidence shows an extremely troubling market state: $0.00 reported total liquidity, $0.00 in both 24h buy and sell volume, and five consecutive hourly candles with zero trading volume, indicating the market has effectively gone dormant or the liquidity pool has been drained. Only 32 holder addresses exist, with the top 10 controlling approximately 19.84% of supply. Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status are all unknown, and no sniper detection data was available. The token's name directly references the well-known 'Google Gemini' AI product without any verified affiliation disclosed in the data, which raises impersonation/branding concerns.

Key points

  • Reported total liquidity of exactly $0.00, suggesting a drained or non-functional trading pool
  • Five consecutive hours of zero-volume candles indicating a dead market
  • Anomalous first candle with a high of 0.000570930369017 far detached from subsequent price action, suggesting a possible data artifact or extreme launch-spike event
  • Unverified use of the 'Google Gemini' brand name with no confirmed affiliation
  • Extremely thin holder base of only 32 addresses
  • All authority (mint/freeze) and sniper data are unavailable, leaving major risk categories unresolved rather than confirmed safe

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

With $0.00 liquidity and zero volume across the last five hourly candles, there is no active market to project short-term price direction from. Price is likely to remain frozen at approximately 0.0000125928434718 until/unless liquidity or trading activity returns.

Target low

0.0000000000001012 (candle 1 open / absolute low observed)

Target high

0.0000173693432854 (candle 3 high, prior local resistance)

Support

0.0000125928434718

Resistance

0.0000173693432854, 0.000570930369017 (treat with caution - likely anomalous)

Medium term · 1-4 weeks

bearish

Absent a liquidity injection or renewed trading interest, the medium-term outlook is bearish-to-dormant. A token with $0 liquidity and a dead order book has a high likelihood of remaining illiquid or being effectively abandoned by the market.

Catalysts

  • Potential re-addition of liquidity to the Meteora DAMM pool
  • Social/community attention pickup around the 'Google Gemini' branding (though this carries impersonation risk)
  • Clarification or confirmation of mint/freeze authority status, which could reduce (or confirm) rug risk

Bullish factors

  • Extremely low FDV ($10) offers theoretical room for large percentage gains on minimal capital inflow if activity resumes
  • AI-branding theme could attract speculative attention if genuinely marketed (though with impersonation risk noted)

Bearish factors

  • $0.00 total liquidity reported
  • Zero trading volume for five consecutive hourly candles
  • Anomalous, likely unreliable price spike in the earliest candle suggesting data or market integrity issues
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status
  • No sniper/early-buyer data to gauge smart money sentiment
  • Extremely small holder base of 32 addresses

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the underlying data shows an inactive, illiquid market with an anomalous first candle and zero volume for the majority of the observed candle history. Reliable technical or fundamental projection is not possible without functioning price discovery, verified authority data, and holder history.

Gemini call history

Full track record →

Sep 21neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
Ad5HGc...B2x6
Total Supply
99,999,195,181.60558

Key Risks

  • Total liquidity reported at $0.00, suggesting the trading pool is drained or the market is effectively non-functional
  • Five consecutive hourly candles with zero volume, indicating trading has halted
  • Extreme, likely anomalous price spike in the first candle (high of 0.000570930369017 vs open of 1.012e-10), raising data integrity concerns
  • Mint/freeze authority status unknown - cannot rule out supply inflation or account freezing risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 9 available hourly candles show an extremely volatile opening sequence followed by a complete flatline. Candle [1] opened at 1.012e-10 and spiked intra-candle to a high of 0.000570930369017 (a multi-million-percent wick) before closing at 0.0000107, suggesting either a chaotic launch/bot-driven price discovery event or corrupted/erroneous price feed data. Candles [2]-[4] show a decay pattern: price rose briefly to a local high of 0.0000173693 (candle 3) then dropped sharply to 0.0000125928434718 by candle 4, where it has remained perfectly frozen (identical O/H/L/C) for five consecutive hours (candles 5-9) with zero volume in each. This is a dead market signature, not organic price stability.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term (last 5 hourly candles) price is perfectly flat at 0.0000125928434718 with zero trading volume - not a genuine sideways consolidation but an indication of trading having effectively stopped. Medium-term, comparing the candle [1] high (0.000570930369017) and early closes to the current frozen price, the token has collapsed by well over 95% from its intraday peak, consistent with a sharp downtrend/crash pattern typical of a failed or abandoned micro-cap launch.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

0.0000125928434718 (current frozen price, acting as de facto floor due to no trading)

Major support

1.01209139285e-10 (absolute low seen at candle 1 open)

Immediate resistance

0.0000173693432854 (candle 3 high)

Major resistance

0.000570930369017 (candle 1 high - likely an anomalous spike/wick)

Because trading has stopped entirely (five consecutive zero-volume, unchanged candles), traditional support/resistance levels are not being actively tested. The candle 1 high of 0.000570930369017 is so far above subsequent price action that it should be treated with suspicion as a possible data artifact or extremely thin-liquidity wick rather than a reliable resistance level. The most relevant near-term reference points are the candle 3 high (~0.0000174) as a prior resistance and the current flat price (~0.0000126) as the only observable support, though with zero liquidity neither level can currently be defended or tested by real trading.

Notable patterns

  • Extreme upper wick / spike-and-collapse on candle 1 (possible data anomaly or bot-driven launch spike)
  • Sharp lower-high sequence from candle 3 to candle 4 indicating rejection and decline
  • Five consecutive flat, zero-volume candles (5-9) indicating a dead/inactive market

Liquidity

Liquidity

Not available

Depth

Not assessed

Slippage risk

Not assessed

Liquidity depth and slippage risk cannot be assessed without a liquidity observation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

99,999,195,181.60558

FDV

$10.00

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Candle data shows the price moved from 1.012e-10 to a high of 0.000570930369017 and back down within a single hour, an extreme multi-order-of-magnitude swing, followed by a total freeze in trading. This is indicative of extreme, likely non-organic volatility.

  • LiquidityNot assessed

    A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control approximately 19.84% of supply across only 32 total holder addresses. While this percentage alone is not extreme, the very small holder base (32 addresses) means concentration risk per-wallet is elevated, and top-100 concentration and holder history are unavailable, limiting full assessment.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Total liquidity reported at $0.00, suggesting the trading pool is drained or the market is effectively non-functional
  • Five consecutive hourly candles with zero volume, indicating trading has halted
  • Extreme, likely anomalous price spike in the first candle (high of 0.000570930369017 vs open of 1.012e-10), raising data integrity concerns
  • Mint/freeze authority status unknown - cannot rule out supply inflation or account freezing risk
  • No sniper data available, so bot/early-dump risk is entirely unassessed
  • Only 32 total holder addresses with top-10 controlling ~19.84% of supply, reflecting a very small and potentially fragile holder base
  • Token trades on adversarial-controlled metadata (name 'Google Gemini', unverified branding association with Google/Gemini AI) which may constitute impersonation/branding risk with no verified affiliation confirmed
  • Fully diluted valuation of only $10.00 against ~100 billion token supply is an extreme outlier signaling a likely failed, abandoned, or non-serious launch

Mitigating factors

  • None of the available data provides genuine reassurance; even the 24h price change of 0% appears to reflect a lack of trading activity rather than stability
  • Top-10 concentration of ~19.84% is not extreme in isolation compared to some highly concentrated micro-caps, though the tiny holder base limits the value of this observation

Suitable for

This token exhibits characteristics consistent with an extremely high-risk, likely failed or abandoned micro-cap/memecoin launch: near-zero liquidity, a dead trading market (zero volume for 5+ consecutive hours), unknown mint/freeze authority status, no sniper coverage, and unverified branding potentially referencing a well-known third-party AI product ('Google Gemini') without confirmed affiliation. This is not suitable for any investor seeking capital preservation or genuine liquidity, and would only be relevant, if at all, to highly speculative participants explicitly comfortable with total loss of capital and understanding that the asset may be effectively untradeable.

The available data points to a token in a state of market failure or dormancy rather than a viable, actively-traded asset. With $0.00 total liquidity, zero volume across the last five hourly candles, an unknown authority/rug-risk profile, and no sniper coverage, there is insufficient credible evidence to support a constructive investment case. The name 'Google Gemini' referencing a major AI brand without verified affiliation is also a notable red flag for potential impersonation.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If liquidity were to be re-added and trading resumed, and if the token gained organic attention (e.g., riding sentiment around AI-themed tokens), there is a theoretical path to renewed price discovery given the extremely low FDV of $10 provides enormous room for percentage-based upside on tiny capital inflows.

  • Extremely low starting valuation ($10 FDV) mathematically allows for large percentage moves on small dollar inflows
  • AI-themed narrative tokens have historically attracted speculative retail interest on Solana
  • Only 32 holders currently, meaning early entrants could benefit disproportionately if the token were to be revived and gain attention

Base Case

Most likely, this token remains illiquid and untraded going forward, with the price effectively frozen due to lack of market participants, and it should be treated as a high-risk, likely non-viable holding absent new information (e.g., verified authority renouncement, new liquidity injections, or credible team/social confirmation).

  • No new liquidity is added to the Meteora DAMM pool in the near term
  • Trading volume remains near zero absent a specific catalyst
  • Authority and verification status remain unresolved without further on-chain investigation by the holder

Bear Case

High probability

The token's market has effectively died: $0.00 liquidity, zero trading volume for 5 straight hours, and a single buy/no sells in the 24h window suggest abandonment, a liquidity rug, or a broken pool. Combined with unknown mint/freeze authority and no sniper visibility, the probability of this being an unrecoverable, illiquid, and potentially unsafe asset is high.

  • $0.00 total liquidity reported on the sole trading pair
  • Zero volume for five consecutive hourly candles indicating a dead market
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves supply-inflation and freeze risks unresolved
  • Unverified branding potentially misappropriating the 'Google Gemini' name without disclosed affiliation
  • Extremely thin holder base of only 32 addresses

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 21, 03:46 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-21 03:45 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, description, social links)
  • USD price feed (single point-in-time price)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (9 most recent candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % change)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count and top-10 concentration only)

Limitations

  • No sniper data was available, so sniper concentration, PnL state, and dump risk are entirely unassessed (not merely low)
  • No holder history exists - only a single current snapshot of holder count (32) and top-10 concentration (19.84%) was provided, preventing any growth/trend or accumulation/distribution analysis
  • No wallet classification or labeling data exists, so no notable holders could be identified and whale sentiment cannot be genuinely determined
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status are all unknown - rug risk from authorities cannot be assessed and must not be assumed low
  • Reported $0.00 liquidity and $0.00 24h volume alongside a recorded '1 buy, 0 sells' create an internal inconsistency in the data that limits confidence in real-time trading figures
  • The candle 1 price spike (high of 0.000570930369017) is far outside the range of subsequent candles and may reflect a data artifact rather than genuine market activity
  • Token metadata fields (name, symbol, description) are creator-supplied and untrusted; branding claims referencing 'Google Gemini' are not verified against any official affiliation

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete, and in places internally inconsistent on-chain and market data. All figures should be independently verified before making any investment decision. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly in extremely low-liquidity or newly launched tokens, carry a high risk of total loss.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Google Gemini ownership?

As of 2026-09-21 03:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 19.84% of supply. It reports 32 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Google Gemini?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-21 03:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $0.00 in buys and $0.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Google Gemini liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -100.00%, from $141,124.62 (2026-09-20 19:00 UTC) to $0.02 (2026-09-20 22:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Google Gemini (Gemini)?

With $0.00 liquidity and zero volume across the last five hourly candles, there is no active market to project short-term price direction from. Price is likely to remain frozen at approximately 0.0000125928434718 until/unless liquidity or trading activity returns. Short-term outlook is neutral (24-48 hours), with a target range of 0.0000000000001012 (candle 1 open / absolute low observed) to 0.0000173693432854 (candle 3 high, prior local resistance).

Is Gemini a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 95/100. This token exhibits characteristics consistent with an extremely high-risk, likely failed or abandoned micro-cap/memecoin launch: near-zero liquidity, a dead trading market (zero volume for 5+ consecutive hours), unknown mint/freeze authority status, no sniper coverage, and unverified branding potentially referencing a well-known third-party AI product ('Google Gemini') without confirmed affiliation. This is not suitable for any investor seeking capital preservation or genuine liquidity, and would only be relevant, if at all, to highly speculative participants explicitly comfortable with total loss of capital and understanding that the asset may be effectively untradeable.

What are the key risks of holding Gemini?

Total liquidity reported at $0.00, suggesting the trading pool is drained or the market is effectively non-functional • Five consecutive hourly candles with zero volume, indicating trading has halted • Extreme, likely anomalous price spike in the first candle (high of 0.000570930369017 vs open of 1.012e-10), raising data integrity concerns

← Back to all predictions

Track Gemini