WALTER

WALTER WORM Price Today & AI Analysis

WALTERSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 23, 2026

Price

$0.000870

+3390.84% 24h · FDV $870,396

Contract

Live
AbkkkbRU8SZ69sZWsykkeutL1sf1Ds1fiu1yDQ8mMVo7

Chain

Holders

1,223

Market cap

$870,396

More tokens on Solana

WALTER WORM: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-23 11:16 UTC

Holder addresses

1,223

Top 10 supply share

18.55%

Reported liquidity

$42,005.00
How concentrated is WALTER WORM ownership?
As of 2026-09-23 11:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 18.55% of supply. It reports 1,223 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling WALTER WORM?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 11:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $495,995.00 in buys and $461,163.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is WALTER WORM liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +878.62%, from $5,091.08 (2026-09-22 12:00 UTC) to $49,822.55 (2026-09-23 11:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-23 11:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-22 12:00 UTC$5,091.08
2026-09-22 13:00 UTC$5,154.81
2026-09-22 15:00 UTC$5,156.46
2026-09-22 16:00 UTC$5,153.61
2026-09-22 17:00 UTC$5,160.43
2026-09-22 18:00 UTC$5,175.25
2026-09-22 20:00 UTC$5,197.21
2026-09-22 21:00 UTC$5,181.19
2026-09-22 22:00 UTC$5,169.99
2026-09-23 01:00 UTC$5,189.33
2026-09-23 05:00 UTC$5,188.02
2026-09-23 07:00 UTC$5,180.92
2026-09-23 09:00 UTC$5,161.80
2026-09-23 10:00 UTC$35,707.76
2026-09-23 11:00 UTC$49,822.55

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about WALTER

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Sep 23, 11:18 AM UTC

FDV

$870,396

Liquidity

$42,005.00

Holders

1,223

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

WALTER (WALTER WORM) is a Solana memecoin trading on a Meteora DAMM pool with an FDV of ~$870.40K and total liquidity of only ~$42.01K. The most recent hourly candles show an extreme, anomalous price move—from roughly $0.0000078 to as high as $0.00097 within the final two hours of the provided series—coinciding with a reported 24h change of ~3390%. Trading analytics show roughly balanced buy/sell flow (51.8%/48.2%) on ~$957K combined 24h volume, but core due-diligence inputs (mint/freeze authority, sniper data, holder history) are unavailable, leaving significant blind spots.

Key points

  • Playable mini-game ('Walter Run') tied to the token concept, per the (untrusted) project description — unverified utility claim
  • Extreme, concentrated price spike in the final 1-2 hourly candles rather than a gradual trend, unusual even for memecoins
  • Thin liquidity (~$42K) relative to FDV (~$870K), a structural fragility not unique to this token but pronounced here
  • Nearly balanced 24h buy/sell pressure despite the price spike, suggesting broad participation rather than one-sided panic (though data can't confirm coordination)

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-72 hours

bearish

The parabolic move from ~$0.0000078 to ~$0.00087-0.00098 within roughly the last two candles is extreme and historically this pattern (near-flat price action for hours followed by a vertical spike on a thin ~$42K liquidity pool) is prone to sharp mean-reversion or a fast unwind as short-term traders and any early holders take profit. Support levels are speculative given the lack of prior price history at these levels.

Target low

$0.00035

Target high

$0.00098

Support

$0.000589 (candle 23 open/low region), $0.00078 (pre-spike consolidation level)

Resistance

$0.00098 (candle 24 high), $0.00074 (candle 23 high)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

Catalysts

  • Any liquidity additions/removals in the Meteora DAMM pool
  • Resolution of unknown mint/freeze authority status (renouncement would reduce rug risk; active authority would raise it)
  • Continued or waning momentum from the mini-game utility narrative
  • Whether buy/sell wallet counts (1,813 buyers vs 1,140 sellers) continue to favor buyers

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume ($496.00K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($461.16K), a 51.8/48.2 split favoring buyers
  • Buyer count (1,813) exceeds seller count (1,140) in the 24h window
  • 5m change remains positive (+11.4%), suggesting some continued momentum at the time of the snapshot

Bearish factors

  • Price spike of ~3390% in a single hour on thin ~$42K liquidity is a classic setup for sharp reversion
  • Total liquidity is small relative to daily volume, meaning large sells can crater price quickly
  • No confirmation of renounced mint/freeze authority leaves dilution/freeze risk open
  • Lack of any sniper or holder-history data prevents ruling out coordinated early-buyer dumping

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the available OHLC history is extremely short (24 hourly candles) with most candles flat/zero-volume before an unexplained vertical spike, liquidity is thin, and critical risk inputs (authorities, sniper activity, holder history) are entirely missing. Any price projection is speculative.

WALTER call history

Full track record →

Sep 23bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
Abkkkb...MVo7
Total Supply
999,999,999 WALTER (6 decimals)

Key Risks

  • Extreme, anomalous price spike (~3390% in 1h/24h) suggests either a low-liquidity pump, a pricing/data artifact, or a coordinated move — high probability of violent reversal.
  • Very thin total liquidity (~$42K) relative to FDV (~$870K) and 24h volume (~$957K combined), creating high slippage and manipulation risk.
  • Mint/freeze authority status is completely unknown — cannot rule out further token minting or account freezing.
  • No sniper coverage available, so early-buyer dumping risk is a genuine unknown rather than a cleared risk.

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Of the 24 hourly candles, the first 22 show very low volatility and often zero volume (flat O=H=L=C in several hours), with price drifting slowly from ~$0.0000074 to ~$0.0000078 — a tight, low-liquidity consolidation range. The final two candles [23] and [24] show an explosive, near-vertical move: candle 23 opens at $0.00000782 and closes at $0.000589 (volume 690,821), and candle 24 ranges from a low of $0.000560 to a high of $0.00098, closing at $0.00085 (volume 366,753). This is a dramatic breakout/gap pattern with no comparable prior volume, sitting far outside the preceding multi-hour range.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Short-term trend is sharply up due to the two explosive candles, but this comes after 20+ hours of flat/sideways price action with negligible volume, meaning the 'trend' is really a single breakout event rather than a sustained directional move. Medium-term trend is technically up only because of this same recent spike distorting the reference base.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

52%

Sell

48%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000589 (candle 23 open/low, pre-breakout base)

Major support

$0.0000078 (pre-spike multi-hour consolidation zone)

Immediate resistance

$0.00098 (candle 24 high, most recent peak)

Major resistance

$0.00098 (all-time high in the provided data window)

The token has effectively re-based two orders of magnitude higher within a single hour. Because there is no price history at these new levels, support/resistance markers are provisional — the $0.000589 candle-23 open is the most relevant near-term support, while the $0.00098 candle-24 high is the only resistance reference available from this dataset.

Notable patterns

  • Long flat/doji-like consolidation across candles 1-22 with several zero-volume hours
  • Explosive breakout candle (23) with a >75x intra-candle range expansion
  • Wide-range candle (24) with a high-low spread of ~$0.00042, indicating high volatility and potential wick-driven exhaustion at the top

Liquidity

Liquidity

$42,005.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of ~$42.01K is very shallow relative to both the $870.40K FDV and the ~$957K in combined 24h volume — a liquidity-to-volume ratio suggesting the pool is being cycled through roughly 22x in a single day, which is characteristic of high-slippage, high-manipulation-risk conditions. Buy volume ($496.00K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($461.16K), a net inflow bias (51.8% vs 48.2%), and buyer count (1,813) exceeds seller count (1,140), which is a mildly bullish flow signal, but the shallow pool means this activity could easily have been what drove the extreme candle-23/24 price spike rather than reflecting durable demand.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,999 WALTER (6 decimals)

FDV

$870.40K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price moved from ~$0.0000078 to $0.00087 within the last two hourly candles (a >100x spike), with the 1h/24h change both reported at ~3390%. This is extreme, likely unsustainable volatility, possibly a liquidity/pricing anomaly or a thin-book pump.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only ~$42.01K against a $870.40K FDV. This is a thin pool relative to the 24h traded volume (~$496K buy + $461K sell), meaning large orders can move price dramatically and slippage on meaningful size will be severe.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control 18.55% of supply among 1,223 holder addresses per the current Codex snapshot. This is a single-point-in-time figure with no historical trend data, so accumulation/distribution behavior cannot be assessed. No wallet classification data is available to confirm whether these are exchanges, LPs, or individuals.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extreme, anomalous price spike (~3390% in 1h/24h) suggests either a low-liquidity pump, a pricing/data artifact, or a coordinated move — high probability of violent reversal.
  • Very thin total liquidity (~$42K) relative to FDV (~$870K) and 24h volume (~$957K combined), creating high slippage and manipulation risk.
  • Mint/freeze authority status is completely unknown — cannot rule out further token minting or account freezing.
  • No sniper coverage available, so early-buyer dumping risk is a genuine unknown rather than a cleared risk.
  • No historical holder trend data exists; the single holder snapshot (1,223 holders, top-10 at 18.55%) cannot be used to infer accumulation, distribution, or organic growth.
  • Memecoin with no verified contract status and adversarial-controlled metadata/description fields (untrusted per data-handling rules).

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy count (3,646) modestly exceeds sell count (3,091) and buy volume (51.8%) slightly exceeds sell volume (48.2%), indicating no acute net sell-off in the aggregate order flow captured.
  • Holder base of 1,223 addresses and top-10 concentration of 18.55% is not extreme in isolation, though it cannot be verified as healthy without history.

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly speculative participants with full risk capital who understand memecoin and thin-liquidity dynamics; unsuitable for risk-averse or capital-preservation-focused investors given unknown authority status, thin liquidity, and an unexplained extreme price spike.

WALTER is a newly viral-looking Solana memecoin whose price just underwent an extreme, unexplained spike (~3390% in the final hour of available data) on a thin ~$42K liquidity base. Order flow is roughly balanced-to-slightly-buyer-favored, and holder count (1,223) with top-10 concentration (18.55%) is not extreme on its face, but almost every other due-diligence input — mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history — is unavailable. This combination of a violent, likely unsustainable price move and major data blind spots makes this a highly speculative, high-risk setup rather than an evidenced investment case.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the recent volume surge reflects genuine, broad-based new demand (supported by buyers outnumbering sellers 1,813 to 1,140 and 51.8% buy-volume share) and if liquidity is added to the Meteora pool while mint/freeze authority turn out to be renounced, WALTER could stabilize at a materially higher valuation than its pre-spike base and attract continued speculative memecoin interest, potentially aided by the 'Walter Run' mini-game narrative.

  • Sustained buyer-dominant order flow (1,813 buyers vs 1,140 sellers)
  • Liquidity growth beyond the current shallow $42.01K
  • Confirmation of renounced mint/freeze authorities
  • Continued attention/marketing around the mini-game utility angle

Base Case

Price likely remains highly volatile and choppy around the newly established range as the market digests the spike, with liquidity remaining thin and both buy and sell pressure staying elevated; a partial retracement from the $0.00098 high is plausible while the token seeks a new equilibrium.

  • No major new liquidity is added in the near term
  • Authority status remains unverified, keeping risk elevated
  • Trading activity (buys/sells) stays roughly balanced as seen in the 24h data
  • No confirmed rug event occurs, but volatility remains extreme

Bear Case

High probability

The vertical, two-candle price spike on thin liquidity reverses sharply as early participants and any concentrated holders take profit, sellers overwhelm the shallow $42.01K pool, and price retraces most or all of the recent gain back toward the pre-spike $0.0000078 range or lower.

  • Extreme overbought short-term momentum after a >100x intra-day move
  • Very shallow liquidity relative to volume, amplifying downside moves
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaving open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezes
  • No sniper/holder-history visibility to rule out coordinated dumping

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 23, 11:18 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-23 11:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals) — partially unknown fields
  • USD price feed and 24h/1h/5m % change data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (24 most recent hours) from Meteora DAMM pair 46KX59VSQzFqiSVJEWFTMPZtHocT49tAUWs4ybxuSGmp
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • No sniper data was available, preventing any assessment of early-buyer concentration or dumping risk.
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was provided — only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration.
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, verified-contract, and mutability status were all explicitly unknown — no rug-risk-from-authority determination could be made.
  • Only 24 hourly candles were available, dominated in volume terms by the final two candles, limiting the reliability of trend/pattern analysis.
  • Token metadata (name, description, social links) originates from the token creator and is treated as untrusted, potentially adversarial marketing content, not verified fact.
  • No top-100 holder concentration figure was provided despite being referenced in the schema; treated as unavailable rather than zero-in-reality.

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data and is provided for informational purposes only. It is NOT financial advice and should not be used as the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency and memecoin trading carries substantial risk of total loss, especially for tokens exhibiting extreme volatility, thin liquidity, and unverified contract authorities such as this one. Conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before acting.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is WALTER WORM ownership?

As of 2026-09-23 11:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 18.55% of supply. It reports 1,223 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling WALTER WORM?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 11:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $495,995.00 in buys and $461,163.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is WALTER WORM liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +878.62%, from $5,091.08 (2026-09-22 12:00 UTC) to $49,822.55 (2026-09-23 11:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for WALTER WORM (WALTER)?

The parabolic move from ~$0.0000078 to ~$0.00087-0.00098 within roughly the last two candles is extreme and historically this pattern (near-flat price action for hours followed by a vertical spike on a thin ~$42K liquidity pool) is prone to sharp mean-reversion or a fast unwind as short-term traders and any early holders take profit. Support levels are speculative given the lack of prior price history at these levels. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-72 hours), with a target range of $0.00035 to $0.00098.

Is WALTER a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly speculative participants with full risk capital who understand memecoin and thin-liquidity dynamics; unsuitable for risk-averse or capital-preservation-focused investors given unknown authority status, thin liquidity, and an unexplained extreme price spike.

What are the key risks of holding WALTER?

Extreme, anomalous price spike (~3390% in 1h/24h) suggests either a low-liquidity pump, a pricing/data artifact, or a coordinated move — high probability of violent reversal. • Very thin total liquidity (~$42K) relative to FDV (~$870K) and 24h volume (~$957K combined), creating high slippage and manipulation risk. • Mint/freeze authority status is completely unknown — cannot rule out further token minting or account freezing.

← Back to all predictions

Track WALTER