HOUSEM

The Black House Price Today & AI Analysis

HOUSEM
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 17, 2026

AZ1fowC7PCS4rKJCY7UFuDqwvGNRRxzJj9BQxiHfpump

$0.054099

-3.27%

FDV $4,087

LiveContract:AZ1fowC7PCS4rKJCY7UFuDqwvGNRRxzJj9BQxiHfpumpChain:SolanaHolders:676Market cap:$4,087

More tokens on Solana

YEN

YEN

The Asian Bull

$0.0571310.7%
MC $7.1K
ZAYED

ZAYED

The Golden Bull

$0.0534140.8%
MC $3.4K
GAMER

GAMER

GamerZONE

$0.0413621.1%
MC $13.6K
Samamfa

Samamfa

Samamfa

$0.0567970.4%
MC $6.8K
ELMO

ELMO

Elmo

$0.0534482.2%
MC $3.4K
TRUMP

TRUMP

OFFICIAL TRUMP

$2.693.3%
MC $2.69B

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about HOUSEM

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 17, 03:17 PM
FDV

$345,729

Liquidity

$60,785

Holders

916

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

HOUSEM (The Black House) is a Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens and a current FDV of ~$345.7K. The token has experienced an extraordinary 797.9% price surge within 24 hours, exploding from near-zero to $0.000346. However, this spike is extremely recent — the historical holder data shows the token sat dormant at just 21 holders for the entire prior 30-day period, with 895 of its 916 current holders acquired within the last 24 hours. Liquidity is very shallow at $60.79K, top holder concentration data is unavailable, and no sniper data exists. The token exhibits all hallmarks of a very early-stage, high-risk pump event.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive 797.9% price surge in 24 hours from a near-zero base
Token was completely dormant for 30+ days with only 21 holders before today's pump
895 out of 916 total holders (98%) acquired within the last 24 hours
Very shallow liquidity of only $60.79K against $345.7K FDV — a 5.7x FDV/liquidity ratio
No verified contract, no social links, no description — minimal project transparency
Mutable=false metadata is a minor positive, but update authority is unknown

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token has already surged ~797.9% in 24 hours and is showing near-balanced buy/sell pressure (49.6% buy vs 50.4% sell) with sell transactions outnumbering buys 3,452 vs 2,284. The 1-hour candle shows a high of $0.000410 with a close of $0.000357, suggesting some rejection at the top. With shallow liquidity ($60.79K) and 895 new holders acquired in the last 24 hours, profit-taking pressure is likely to intensify. Short-term downside risk is elevated.

Target low$0.000035
Target high$0.000410
Support: $0.000277 (1h candle low), $0.000035 (prior 24h open/base)
Resistance: $0.000394 (14:00 candle high), $0.000410 (15:00 candle high — recent peak)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Given the token's 30-day dormancy prior to this pump, absence of any project fundamentals, social links, or description, and extremely thin liquidity, sustaining the current price level is unlikely without continued speculative inflows. Most pump-and-dump patterns on PumpSwap resolve with 80–95% retracements from peak. A return toward pre-pump levels near $0.000035 is the base expectation unless new catalysts emerge.

Catalysts
  • Continued speculative retail inflow if the token gains social media traction
  • Any project announcement or utility reveal (currently none exist)
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Whale accumulation at current levels (no data to support this currently)

Bullish factors

  • 797.9% price surge demonstrates strong initial speculative demand
  • 1,137 unique buyers in 24 hours shows broad retail participation
  • Sell volume only marginally exceeds buy volume (50.4% vs 49.6%), suggesting buying pressure has not fully collapsed
  • Holder count grew from 21 to 916 in 24 hours — rapid community formation

Bearish factors

  • Token was dormant for 30+ days with only 21 holders — no organic growth history
  • Liquidity of $60.79K is extremely shallow relative to $345.7K FDV
  • Sell transactions (3,452) significantly outnumber buy transactions (2,284)
  • No project description, social links, or verified contract
  • Update authority is unknown — potential rug risk
  • Top holder concentration data unavailable — distribution health unknown
  • Price % change shown as 0% for 5m, 6h, and 24h in analytics (data inconsistency) raises data reliability concerns
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: only 2 hourly OHLC candles available for technical analysis, no sniper data, no top holder data, no project description or social links, and the extreme recency of the price move. The token's behavior is driven entirely by speculative momentum with no fundamental anchor.

HOUSEM call history

Full track record →
Jul 17bearish
24h-97.6%
7d-98.8%
30d-99.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available. Candle [2] (14:00 UTC) was the explosive breakout candle: O=$0.0000351, H=$0.000395, L=$0.0000349, C=$0.000325 — a massive bullish candle with a range of ~10x from low to high, closing near the upper third. Volume was enormous at $697,633. Candle [1] (15:00 UTC) opened at $0.000319, reached a new high of $0.000410, but closed at $0.000357 on much lower volume ($78,133). The second candle shows a higher high ($0.000410 vs $0.000395) but lower volume and a close below the high — a potential shooting star / bearish wick pattern suggesting exhaustion at the top.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 50%Sell 50%

Short-term trend is technically up given the explosive breakout candle, but with only 2 candles and the token dormant for 30 days prior, the medium-term trend is effectively sideways/unknown. The second candle's bearish wick at the high is an early warning sign of potential reversal.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000277 (15:00 candle low)
Major$0.000035 (pre-pump base, 14:00 candle low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000394–$0.000395 (14:00 candle high)
Major$0.000410 (15:00 candle high — all-time high)

The all-time high of $0.000410 is the only meaningful resistance. Below current price, $0.000277 is the nearest support from the 15:00 candle low. A break below $0.000277 would open a path back toward the pre-pump base near $0.000035. The gap between $0.000035 and $0.000277 is essentially air — there is no established support structure in this zone given the token's dormancy.

Notable patterns

  • Explosive breakout candle (14:00): near-10x range from low to high in a single hour
  • Bearish wick / shooting star signal on 15:00 candle: higher high but close well below the high
  • Volume exhaustion: 88.8% volume decline from candle 1 to candle 2
  • Bullish-to-bearish divergence: price made higher high while volume collapsed
  • Gap structure: no price history between $0.000035 and $0.000277 — no support in this zone

Total holders916
24h Δ+98
7d Δ+98
30d Δ+98
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is perfectly correlated with the price pump — both occurred simultaneously within the last 24 hours. The token had exactly 21 holders for the entire 30-day historical period (June 17 – July 16, 2026) with zero net change on any day. Then within a single 24-hour window, holders surged from 21 to 916 (+895, +98%). This is not organic growth — it is entirely pump-driven retail FOMO. The 1-hour holder change of +565 (+62%) is particularly alarming, suggesting the majority of new holders entered very recently at elevated prices.

The holder history is stark: 21 holders for 30 consecutive days with zero growth, followed by an explosive +895 holders (+98%) in 24 hours. This pattern is characteristic of a coordinated pump event rather than organic project development. The 1-hour figure of +565 new holders suggests the pump is still attracting new entrants at the time of analysis. Acquisition method is almost entirely via swap (911 of 916 holders), confirming these are market buyers rather than airdrop or transfer recipients. The distribution data shows 0% in all whale/shark/dolphin/fish/octopus categories and 0% top10/top100 concentration — this data appears to be missing or unavailable rather than genuinely zero, which limits concentration analysis.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for HOUSEM — no top 20 holders were returned, and the supply concentration metrics show 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which almost certainly reflects a data gap rather than genuine perfect distribution. This is a significant analytical blind spot. Without knowing who holds the supply, it is impossible to assess concentration risk, identify team/treasury wallets, or evaluate whale selling pressure. Given the token's 30-day dormancy with only 21 holders, those original holders likely hold a disproportionate share of supply. The 'very_concentrated' classification would be more appropriate if data were available, but 'concentrated' is used conservatively given the data gap. Investors should treat the missing holder data as a red flag rather than a clean bill of health.

Liquidity$60,790
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$396,440
Sell$403,460
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers1,137
Unique sellers996

Liquidity is critically shallow at $60.79K against a $345.73K FDV — a ratio of approximately 5.7x FDV to liquidity. This means any meaningful sell order will cause severe slippage. The 24h trading volume of ~$799.9K ($396.44K buy + $403.46K sell) is approximately 13x the total liquidity pool, indicating extremely high turnover relative to depth. Net flow is marginally negative (sell volume $403.46K vs buy volume $396.44K), confirming slight selling pressure dominance. Notably, while unique buyers (1,137) exceed unique sellers (996), sell transactions (3,452) far outnumber buy transactions (2,284) — suggesting sellers are executing more frequent, smaller transactions, which is consistent with distribution behavior. The PumpSwap pair (5Z8zi47YaJE3ARqb8GiE39joXKjQXjnf3fsLnEtvV8fz) is the sole liquidity venue, creating single-point-of-failure risk.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000 HOUSEM
FDV$345,728.57

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

HOUSEM has a standard 1 billion token supply with 6 decimals, typical of PumpFun/PumpSwap launches. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, which prevents a definitive assessment of mint and freeze authority status. The token is marked as 'Mutable: false', which is a minor positive — it suggests the token metadata cannot be changed. However, 'Mutable: false' does not necessarily mean mint or freeze authorities are renounced. The contract is unverified and there are no social links or project description, providing zero fundamental context. The FDV of $345.73K is modest but entirely speculative given the token's lack of utility or community history. The absence of authority data should be treated as elevated risk rather than neutral.

Volatility
high

797.9% price increase in 24 hours from a near-zero base. Only 2 hourly candles of price history exist. Extreme volatility is inherent to this asset class and this specific token's behavior.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $60.79K. 24h volume of ~$800K is 13x the liquidity pool. Any position of meaningful size will face severe slippage on exit. Single DEX venue (PumpSwap) with no alternative liquidity.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is entirely unavailable. The token had only 21 holders for 30+ days before the pump — those original holders likely hold a concentrated share of supply and are sitting on massive unrealized gains. Distribution health cannot be verified.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, but the 30-day dormancy with 21 original holders creates an equivalent risk: early holders at near-zero cost basis represent a significant overhang. Sell transactions (3,452) already outnumber buy transactions (2,284) in 24 hours.

Authority
high

Update authority is 'unknown'. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed as renounced. Unverified contract. No social links or project description. These factors collectively represent elevated rug pull risk.

Key risks

  • Token was dormant for 30+ days with 21 holders — pump appears coordinated rather than organic
  • Liquidity of $60.79K is critically insufficient to support $345.73K FDV without severe slippage
  • Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Update authority unknown — mint/freeze authority renouncement unconfirmed
  • No project description, social links, or verified contract — zero fundamental backing
  • 895 of 916 holders (98%) entered in the last 24 hours at elevated prices — mass exit risk
  • Sell transactions (3,452) outnumber buy transactions (2,284) by 51% — distribution pattern
  • Volume exhaustion signal: 88.8% drop in hourly volume from peak candle

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable: false metadata reduces risk of metadata manipulation
  • 1,137 unique buyers in 24 hours shows genuine retail interest, not just bot activity
  • Near-balanced buy/sell volume (49.6%/50.4%) suggests the pump has not fully collapsed yet
  • FDV of $345.73K is relatively low — limited absolute dollar downside compared to larger caps
  • PumpSwap listing provides some baseline of legitimacy over pure OTC trading
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced traders with a very high risk tolerance who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in micro-cap meme token trading. Position sizing should be minimal (well under 1% of portfolio). This is not an investment — it is a speculative trade with casino-level risk.

HOUSEM is a high-risk speculative meme token that experienced a sudden 797.9% pump after 30+ days of complete dormancy. There is no fundamental investment thesis — no utility, no team transparency, no community history, and no project description. The only thesis is purely momentum-based speculation. The risk/reward is extremely asymmetric to the downside for new entrants at current prices.

Bull case (low)

Continued momentum and viral spread: If the token gains social media traction (Twitter/Telegram), the pump continues to attract new buyers, and the FDV expands toward $1M–$5M range before a correction. Early 24h buyers who entered near $0.000035–$0.000100 could see further gains.

  • Viral social media spread driving FOMO buying
  • Broader Solana meme coin market in risk-on mode
  • Original 21 holders choosing to hold rather than sell, reducing supply pressure
  • New whale accumulation at current levels

Base case

Short-term consolidation followed by gradual decline: The token consolidates in the $0.000200–$0.000350 range for 24–72 hours as momentum fades, then gradually declines toward $0.000050–$0.000100 over the following week as new buyer interest wanes and early holders continue distributing.

  • No major new catalysts emerge (no viral social media, no exchange listing)
  • Liquidity remains thin and does not significantly increase
  • Early holders gradually distribute rather than dumping all at once
  • Broader Solana market remains neutral

Bear case (high)

Rapid pump-and-dump collapse: The original 21 holders and early pump participants sell into the retail FOMO, liquidity is insufficient to absorb selling pressure, and the price collapses 80–95% back toward pre-pump levels near $0.000035. The 895 new holders are left holding near-worthless tokens.

  • Original 21 holders selling concentrated positions into thin liquidity
  • Volume exhaustion already visible (88.8% hourly volume decline)
  • Sell transactions already outnumber buy transactions (3,452 vs 2,284)
  • No fundamental support to prevent price collapse
  • Shallow liquidity ($60.79K) amplifies downside moves

GeneratedJul 17, 03:17 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of 2026-07-17T15:00 UTC. OHLC data covers only the most recent 2 hourly candles. Historical holder data covers June 17 – July 16, 2026 (30 days prior to pump).
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (Mint: AZ1fowC7PCS4rKJCY7UFuDqwvGNRRxzJj9BQxiHfpump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (5Z8zi47YaJE3ARqb8GiE39joXKjQXjnf3fsLnEtvV8fz)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles, 2026-07-17 14:00–15:00 UTC)
  • 24-hour trading analytics
  • Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
  • Holder acquisition and distribution data

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely limited
  • Top holder data entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — authority renouncement cannot be confirmed
  • Supply concentration shows 0% for top10/top100 — likely a data gap, not genuine distribution
  • No project description, social links, or team information available
  • Price % change fields show 0% for 5m/6h/24h despite obvious price movement — possible data inconsistency in source
  • Token is extremely new to active trading — all patterns are based on <2 hours of price history

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in HOUSEM. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000 HOUSEM

Key Risks

•Token was dormant for 30+ days with 21 holders — pump appears coordinated rather than organic
•Liquidity of $60.79K is critically insufficient to support $345.73K FDV without severe slippage
•Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed
•Update authority unknown — mint/freeze authority renouncement unconfirmed

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for HOUSEM. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. What can be inferred from trading analytics: 3,452 sell transactions vs 2,284 buy transactions in 24 hours suggests early participants are actively distributing. The token was dormant at 21 holders for 30+ days before today's pump, meaning those original 21 holders had ample time to accumulate at near-zero prices and are likely sitting on significant unrealized gains — representing a substantial overhang risk even without formal sniper data.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available for this token.

The 21 original holders who held the token during its 30-day dormancy period are likely in significant profit given the ~797.9% price surge. Their sell behavior is unknown but they represent a concentrated profit-taking risk. The 895 new holders who entered in the last 24 hours are at varying cost bases, with those who bought early in the pump potentially also in profit.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for The Black House (HOUSEM)?

The token has already surged ~797.9% in 24 hours and is showing near-balanced buy/sell pressure (49.6% buy vs 50.4% sell) with sell transactions outnumbering buys 3,452 vs 2,284. The 1-hour candle shows a high of $0.000410 with a close of $0.000357, suggesting some rejection at the top. With shallow liquidity ($60.79K) and 895 new holders acquired in the last 24 hours, profit-taking pressure is likely to intensify. Short-term downside risk is elevated. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000035 to $0.000410.

Is HOUSEM a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced traders with a very high risk tolerance who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in micro-cap meme token trading. Position sizing should be minimal (well under 1% of portfolio). This is not an investment — it is a speculative trade with casino-level risk.

How are HOUSEM holders trending?

The Black House currently has 916 holders and is growing (24h: 98, 7d: 98, 30d: 98). The holder history is stark: 21 holders for 30 consecutive days with zero growth, followed by an explosive +895 holders (+98%) in 24 hours. This pattern is characteristic of a coordinated pump event rather than organic project development. The 1-hour figure of +565 new holders suggests the pump is still attracting new entrants at the time of analysis. Acquisition method is almost entirely via swap (911 of 916 holders), confirming these are market buyers rather than airdrop or transfer recipients. The distribution data shows 0% in all whale/shark/dolphin/fish/octopus categories and 0% top10/top100 concentration — this data appears to be missing or unavailable rather than genuinely zero, which limits concentration analysis.

What does sniper activity look like for HOUSEM?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding HOUSEM?

Token was dormant for 30+ days with 21 holders — pump appears coordinated rather than organic • Liquidity of $60.79K is critically insufficient to support $345.73K FDV without severe slippage • Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed

← Back to all predictions

Track HOUSEM