The Black House Price Today & AI Analysis

Q: Is HOUSEM a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced traders with a very high risk tolerance who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in micro-cap meme token trading. Position sizing should be minimal (well under 1% of portfolio). This is not an investment — it is a speculative trade with casino-level risk.

HOUSEMSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 17, 2026

$0.0₅3828

Contract

Live

AZ1fowC7PCS4rKJCY7UFuDqwvGNRRxzJj9BQxiHfpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

655

Market cap

$3,816

At a $1M market cap, $HOUSEM would be $0.001003 (262x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Ask Unhosted AI about HOUSEM

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

meritcoinmeritcoin$0.0₅3793+0.0%MC $3.0K

USOHUnited States Oil Holdings$0.0₅2068+0.0%MC $2.1K

goyslopgoyslop$0.0₅7407-10.4%MC $7.4K

GlimGlim$0.0₅8010+0.0%MC $5.7K

KUMARThe Kumar Method$0.0₅3550+0.0%MC $3.5K

PUMPPump$0.004541-4.6%MC $1.61B

The Black House: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-17 15:17 UTC

Holder addresses

916

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$60,785.41

How concentrated is The Black House ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 916 addresses (2026-07-17 15:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling The Black House?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is The Black House liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-17 15:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $60,785.41. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-17 15:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 17, 03:17 PM UTC

FDV

$345,729

Liquidity

$60,785.41

Holders

916

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

HOUSEM (The Black House) is a Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens and a current FDV of ~$345.7K. The token has experienced an extraordinary 797.9% price surge within 24 hours, exploding from near-zero to $0.000346. However, this spike is extremely recent — the historical holder data shows the token sat dormant at just 21 holders for the entire prior 30-day period, with 895 of its 916 current holders acquired within the last 24 hours. Liquidity is very shallow at $60.79K, top holder concentration data is unavailable, and no sniper data exists. The token exhibits all hallmarks of a very early-stage, high-risk pump event.

Key points

Explosive 797.9% price surge in 24 hours from a near-zero base
Token was completely dormant for 30+ days with only 21 holders before today's pump
895 out of 916 total holders (98%) acquired within the last 24 hours
Very shallow liquidity of only $60.79K against $345.7K FDV — a 5.7x FDV/liquidity ratio
No verified contract, no social links, no description — minimal project transparency
Mutable=false metadata is a minor positive, but update authority is unknown

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has already surged ~797.9% in 24 hours and is showing near-balanced buy/sell pressure (49.6% buy vs 50.4% sell) with sell transactions outnumbering buys 3,452 vs 2,284. The 1-hour candle shows a high of $0.000410 with a close of $0.000357, suggesting some rejection at the top. With shallow liquidity ($60.79K) and 895 new holders acquired in the last 24 hours, profit-taking pressure is likely to intensify. Short-term downside risk is elevated.

Target low

$0.000035

Target high

$0.000410

Support: $0.000277 (1h candle low), $0.000035 (prior 24h open/base)
Resistance: $0.000394 (14:00 candle high), $0.000410 (15:00 candle high — recent peak)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Given the token's 30-day dormancy prior to this pump, absence of any project fundamentals, social links, or description, and extremely thin liquidity, sustaining the current price level is unlikely without continued speculative inflows. Most pump-and-dump patterns on PumpSwap resolve with 80–95% retracements from peak. A return toward pre-pump levels near $0.000035 is the base expectation unless new catalysts emerge.

Catalysts

Continued speculative retail inflow if the token gains social media traction
Any project announcement or utility reveal (currently none exist)
Broader Solana meme coin market rally
Whale accumulation at current levels (no data to support this currently)

Bullish factors

797.9% price surge demonstrates strong initial speculative demand
1,137 unique buyers in 24 hours shows broad retail participation
Sell volume only marginally exceeds buy volume (50.4% vs 49.6%), suggesting buying pressure has not fully collapsed
Holder count grew from 21 to 916 in 24 hours — rapid community formation

Bearish factors

Token was dormant for 30+ days with only 21 holders — no organic growth history
Liquidity of $60.79K is extremely shallow relative to $345.7K FDV
Sell transactions (3,452) significantly outnumber buy transactions (2,284)
No project description, social links, or verified contract
Update authority is unknown — potential rug risk
Top holder concentration data unavailable — distribution health unknown
Price % change shown as 0% for 5m, 6h, and 24h in analytics (data inconsistency) raises data reliability concerns

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: only 2 hourly OHLC candles available for technical analysis, no sniper data, no top holder data, no project description or social links, and the extreme recency of the price move. The token's behavior is driven entirely by speculative momentum with no fundamental anchor.

HOUSEM call history

Full track record →

Jul 17bearish@ $0.000346

24h-97.6%

7d-98.8%

30d-99.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: AZ1fow...pump
Total Supply: 1,000,000,000 HOUSEM

Key Risks

Token was dormant for 30+ days with 21 holders — pump appears coordinated rather than organic
Liquidity of $60.79K is critically insufficient to support $345.73K FDV without severe slippage
Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed
Update authority unknown — mint/freeze authority renouncement unconfirmed

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available. Candle [2] (14:00 UTC) was the explosive breakout candle: O=$0.0000351, H=$0.000395, L=$0.0000349, C=$0.000325 — a massive bullish candle with a range of ~10x from low to high, closing near the upper third. Volume was enormous at $697,633. Candle [1] (15:00 UTC) opened at $0.000319, reached a new high of $0.000410, but closed at $0.000357 on much lower volume ($78,133). The second candle shows a higher high ($0.000410 vs $0.000395) but lower volume and a close below the high — a potential shooting star / bearish wick pattern suggesting exhaustion at the top.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically up given the explosive breakout candle, but with only 2 candles and the token dormant for 30 days prior, the medium-term trend is effectively sideways/unknown. The second candle's bearish wick at the high is an early warning sign of potential reversal.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000277 (15:00 candle low)

Major support

$0.000035 (pre-pump base, 14:00 candle low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000394–$0.000395 (14:00 candle high)

Major resistance

$0.000410 (15:00 candle high — all-time high)

The all-time high of $0.000410 is the only meaningful resistance. Below current price, $0.000277 is the nearest support from the 15:00 candle low. A break below $0.000277 would open a path back toward the pre-pump base near $0.000035. The gap between $0.000035 and $0.000277 is essentially air — there is no established support structure in this zone given the token's dormancy.

Notable patterns

Explosive breakout candle (14:00): near-10x range from low to high in a single hour
Bearish wick / shooting star signal on 15:00 candle: higher high but close well below the high
Volume exhaustion: 88.8% volume decline from candle 1 to candle 2
Bullish-to-bearish divergence: price made higher high while volume collapsed
Gap structure: no price history between $0.000035 and $0.000277 — no support in this zone

Liquidity

$60,785.41

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $60.79K against a $345.73K FDV — a ratio of approximately 5.7x FDV to liquidity. This means any meaningful sell order will cause severe slippage. The 24h trading volume of ~$799.9K ($396.44K buy + $403.46K sell) is approximately 13x the total liquidity pool, indicating extremely high turnover relative to depth. Net flow is marginally negative (sell volume $403.46K vs buy volume $396.44K), confirming slight selling pressure dominance. Notably, while unique buyers (1,137) exceed unique sellers (996), sell transactions (3,452) far outnumber buy transactions (2,284) — suggesting sellers are executing more frequent, smaller transactions, which is consistent with distribution behavior. The PumpSwap pair (5Z8zi47YaJE3ARqb8GiE39joXKjQXjnf3fsLnEtvV8fz) is the sole liquidity venue, creating single-point-of-failure risk.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 HOUSEM

FDV

$345,728.57

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
797.9% price increase in 24 hours from a near-zero base. Only 2 hourly candles of price history exist. Extreme volatility is inherent to this asset class and this specific token's behavior.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $60.79K. 24h volume of ~$800K is 13x the liquidity pool. Any position of meaningful size will face severe slippage on exit. Single DEX venue (PumpSwap) with no alternative liquidity.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Token was dormant for 30+ days with 21 holders — pump appears coordinated rather than organic
Liquidity of $60.79K is critically insufficient to support $345.73K FDV without severe slippage
Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed
Update authority unknown — mint/freeze authority renouncement unconfirmed
No project description, social links, or verified contract — zero fundamental backing
895 of 916 holders (98%) entered in the last 24 hours at elevated prices — mass exit risk
Sell transactions (3,452) outnumber buy transactions (2,284) by 51% — distribution pattern
Volume exhaustion signal: 88.8% drop in hourly volume from peak candle

Mitigating factors

Mutable: false metadata reduces risk of metadata manipulation
1,137 unique buyers in 24 hours shows genuine retail interest, not just bot activity
Near-balanced buy/sell volume (49.6%/50.4%) suggests the pump has not fully collapsed yet
FDV of $345.73K is relatively low — limited absolute dollar downside compared to larger caps
PumpSwap listing provides some baseline of legitimacy over pure OTC trading

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced traders with a very high risk tolerance who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in micro-cap meme token trading. Position sizing should be minimal (well under 1% of portfolio). This is not an investment — it is a speculative trade with casino-level risk.

HOUSEM is a high-risk speculative meme token that experienced a sudden 797.9% pump after 30+ days of complete dormancy. There is no fundamental investment thesis — no utility, no team transparency, no community history, and no project description. The only thesis is purely momentum-based speculation. The risk/reward is extremely asymmetric to the downside for new entrants at current prices.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued momentum and viral spread: If the token gains social media traction (Twitter/Telegram), the pump continues to attract new buyers, and the FDV expands toward $1M–$5M range before a correction. Early 24h buyers who entered near $0.000035–$0.000100 could see further gains.

Viral social media spread driving FOMO buying
Broader Solana meme coin market in risk-on mode
Original 21 holders choosing to hold rather than sell, reducing supply pressure
New whale accumulation at current levels

Base Case

Short-term consolidation followed by gradual decline: The token consolidates in the $0.000200–$0.000350 range for 24–72 hours as momentum fades, then gradually declines toward $0.000050–$0.000100 over the following week as new buyer interest wanes and early holders continue distributing.

No major new catalysts emerge (no viral social media, no exchange listing)
Liquidity remains thin and does not significantly increase
Early holders gradually distribute rather than dumping all at once
Broader Solana market remains neutral

Bear Case

High probability

Rapid pump-and-dump collapse: The original 21 holders and early pump participants sell into the retail FOMO, liquidity is insufficient to absorb selling pressure, and the price collapses 80–95% back toward pre-pump levels near $0.000035. The 895 new holders are left holding near-worthless tokens.

Original 21 holders selling concentrated positions into thin liquidity
Volume exhaustion already visible (88.8% hourly volume decline)
Sell transactions already outnumber buy transactions (3,452 vs 2,284)
No fundamental support to prevent price collapse
Shallow liquidity ($60.79K) amplifies downside moves

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 17, 03:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-17 15:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (Mint: AZ1fowC7PCS4rKJCY7UFuDqwvGNRRxzJj9BQxiHfpump)
PumpSwap pair data (5Z8zi47YaJE3ARqb8GiE39joXKjQXjnf3fsLnEtvV8fz)
Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles, 2026-07-17 14:00–15:00 UTC)
24-hour trading analytics
Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
Holder acquisition and distribution data

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely limited
Top holder data entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
No sniper data available — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
Update authority listed as 'unknown' — authority renouncement cannot be confirmed
Supply concentration shows 0% for top10/top100 — likely a data gap, not genuine distribution
No project description, social links, or team information available
Price % change fields show 0% for 5m/6h/24h despite obvious price movement — possible data inconsistency in source
Token is extremely new to active trading — all patterns are based on <2 hours of price history

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in HOUSEM. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is The Black House ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 916 addresses (2026-07-17 15:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling The Black House?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is The Black House liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-17 15:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $60,785.41. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for The Black House (HOUSEM)?

Is HOUSEM a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced traders with a very high risk tolerance who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in micro-cap meme token trading. Position sizing should be minimal (well under 1% of portfolio). This is not an investment — it is a speculative trade with casino-level risk.

What are the key risks of holding HOUSEM?

Token was dormant for 30+ days with 21 holders — pump appears coordinated rather than organic • Liquidity of $60.79K is critically insufficient to support $345.73K FDV without severe slippage • Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed