Cyber Savage Price Today & AI Analysis

SAVAGESolanaAnalysis as of Jul 25, 2026

$0.0₅3436

-6.38% 24h

Contract

Live

ATBqqcqKumxQEgLBTbuL5iNMMk7DNPzwKNTi8XVSpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

423

Market cap

$3,384

At a $1M market cap, $SAVAGE would be $0.001015 (296x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is SAVAGE a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 21

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about SAVAGE

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

QCATQuantum Cat$0.0₅3097+0.0%MC $3.1K

ASTRAAstravault$0.0₅2916+0.0%MC $2.9K

$NO BRAINNo thanks l use Linkedin$0.0₅2160+0.0%MC $2.2K

BEANKiller Bean$0.0₅3167+0.0%MC $3.2K

MUSKCRAFTMUSKCRAFT$0.0₅2424+0.5%MC $2.4K

KimchiAura Final Boss$0.0123-33.9%MC $12.23M

Cyber Savage: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-25 08:17 UTC

Holder addresses

1,589

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$51,109.87

How concentrated is Cyber Savage ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,589 addresses (2026-07-25 08:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Cyber Savage?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Cyber Savage liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-25 08:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $51,109.87. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-25 08:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 25, 08:17 AM UTC

FDV

Liquidity

$51,109.87

Holders

1,589

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Cyber Savage (SAVAGE) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana with a total formatted supply of 1 (indicating extreme decimal manipulation or a non-standard supply structure), trading at ~$0.000286 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$274.86K. The token has experienced a dramatic 112.8% price surge in 24 hours, yet exhibits multiple severe red flags: the update authority is unknown and the token is mutable, top holder data is entirely unavailable, supply concentration metrics report 0% for top 10 and top 100 (data anomaly), and historical holder counts were flat at 84 for 30 consecutive days before a sudden spike to 1,589 holders — all within the last hour. This pattern is highly consistent with artificial activity, bot-driven holder inflation, or a coordinated pump scheme.

Key points

Total formatted supply of 1 — highly anomalous, likely a decimal/display artifact or intentional obfuscation
Holder count was exactly 84 for 30 straight days, then jumped +1,505 (95%) within a single hour — extreme manipulation signal
Top holder data entirely unavailable — prevents any concentration or whale analysis
Token is mutable with unknown update authority — maximum rug risk from authority perspective
112.8% price pump in 24h with sell pressure (52%) slightly exceeding buy pressure (48%) and more sellers than buyers (4,018 sells vs 3,398 buys)

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has already pumped 112.8% in 24h and is showing a sharp intra-candle reversal. Candle [1] opened at $0.000186, spiked to $0.000309, then closed at $0.0000318 — a massive wick-down indicating aggressive selling into the pump. Candle [2] then recovered from $0.0000305 to close at $0.000180. The current price of $0.000286 sits near the upper range of recent candles. With sell pressure at 52% and 4,018 sells vs 3,398 buys, short-term downside is the higher-probability outcome. The artificial holder spike adds further instability.

Target low

$0.000030

Target high

$0.000362

Support: $0.000030 (candle [2] low), $0.000172 (candle [1] low)
Resistance: $0.000309 (candle [1] high), $0.000362 (candle [2] high)

Medium term · 1–30 days

bearish

Given the mutable contract with unknown authority, the artificial holder inflation pattern, the absence of top holder data, and the shallow liquidity of only $51.11K, the medium-term outlook is strongly bearish. Tokens with these characteristics on PumpFun typically dump rapidly after the initial pump phase. Without verifiable organic growth or project fundamentals, sustained price appreciation is unlikely.

Catalysts

Potential rug pull or authority exploit given mutable token with unknown update authority
Holder count normalization as bot wallets exit
Continued sell pressure (52%) eroding price
Shallow liquidity ($51.11K) amplifying downside moves

Bullish factors

Strong 24h price appreciation of +112.8%
High transaction volume ($883K+ combined buy/sell in 24h) relative to $51.11K liquidity
2,132 unique buyers in 24h suggesting broad interest
Active social presence (Telegram, Twitter, Website)

Bearish factors

Sell pressure exceeds buy pressure (52% vs 48%); more sells (4,018) than buys (3,398)
Candle [1] shows a severe wick-down from $0.000309 to close at $0.0000318 — dump signal
Holder count was flat at 84 for 30 days then spiked +1,505 in 1 hour — artificial inflation
Top holder data unavailable — cannot assess concentration or whale behavior
Token is mutable with unknown update authority — rug risk
Shallow liquidity of $51.11K vs $883K daily volume — extreme slippage risk
FDV of $274.86K vs $51.11K liquidity = very thin market depth

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to missing top holder data, anomalous supply metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%), unknown update authority, and the highly irregular holder spike pattern. The two available OHLC candles show extreme intra-candle volatility making price prediction unreliable. The data anomalies suggest possible data feed issues or deliberate obfuscation.

SAVAGE call history

Full track record →

Jul 25bearish@ $0.000286

24h-99.0%

7d-99.0%

30d-98.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: ATBqqc...pump
Total Supply: 1 (formatted, 0 decimals) — highly anomalous; likely a display artifact or non-standard token structure

Key Risks

Mutable token with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or metadata manipulation
Artificial holder inflation: +1,505 holders in 1 hour after 30 days of zero growth — strong bot/manipulation signal
Top holder data completely unavailable — cannot assess insider or whale concentration
Critically shallow liquidity ($51.11K) vs high volume ($883.8K/day) — extreme slippage and exit risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (07:00 UTC): O=$0.0000318, H=$0.000362, L=$0.0000305, C=$0.000180 — a strong bullish candle with a massive upper wick, suggesting a spike and partial rejection. Candle [1] (08:00 UTC): O=$0.000186, H=$0.000309, L=$0.000172, C=$0.0000318 — a bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern where price opened near the prior close, spiked to $0.000309, then collapsed to close at $0.0000318, erasing nearly all gains. This two-candle sequence shows a classic pump-and-dump wick pattern: rapid spike followed by aggressive sell-off. Current price of $0.000286 is above candle [1]'s close, suggesting a secondary recovery bounce, but the overall pattern remains bearish.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term is highly volatile and effectively sideways given the extreme wicks in both directions. The medium-term trend is bearish given the 30-day stagnation at 84 holders, the pump-and-dump candle pattern, and the sell-heavy order flow.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

48%

Sell

52%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000172 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.000030 (candle [2] low / near-zero floor)

Immediate resistance

$0.000309 (candle [1] high)

Major resistance

$0.000362 (candle [2] high / all-time high in data)

The $0.000030 level represents the absolute floor seen in the data and acts as major support. Immediate support sits at $0.000172 (candle [1] low). On the upside, $0.000309 is immediate resistance (candle [1] high), with $0.000362 as the major resistance and apparent all-time high within the available data window. Current price of $0.000286 sits in the middle of this range.

Notable patterns

Shooting star / bearish wick on candle [1]: opened $0.000186, spiked to $0.000309, collapsed to close $0.0000318 — classic pump-and-dump candle
Hammer/recovery on candle [2]: low of $0.0000305, closed at $0.000180 — partial recovery but with large upper wick suggesting resistance
Extreme intra-candle volatility: candle [2] range spans ~1,085% from low to high
Volume spike from near-zero to $883K+ in 24h — anomalous activity consistent with coordinated trading

Liquidity

$51,109.87

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $51.11K against a 24h trading volume of ~$883.8K — a volume-to-liquidity ratio of approximately 17.3:1. This means the pool is being turned over more than 17 times per day, creating extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position. The net flow is negative (outflow): sell volume ($459.90K) exceeds buy volume ($423.91K) by ~$35.99K, indicating net capital is leaving the token. While there are more unique buyers (2,132) than sellers (1,216), the higher average sell size suggests larger holders are distributing into retail buy pressure — a classic distribution pattern. The PumpSwap pair (FueSKEc17u3j1Nb9PTFQfPS6kVo9JhUb8hPPKZ3PkVm7) is the sole liquidity venue, meaning there is no alternative market depth. Any large sell order will face severe price impact.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1 (formatted, 0 decimals) — highly anomalous; likely a display artifact or non-standard token structure

FDV

$274,860

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
112.8% price surge in 24h with intra-candle swings of over 1,000% (candle [2] range: $0.0000305 to $0.000362). Extreme volatility makes position sizing and exit timing nearly impossible.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $51.11K against $883.8K daily volume (17:1 ratio). Any position above a few hundred dollars will face severe slippage. Single liquidity venue on PumpSwap with no alternative markets.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Mutable token with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or metadata manipulation
Artificial holder inflation: +1,505 holders in 1 hour after 30 days of zero growth — strong bot/manipulation signal
Top holder data completely unavailable — cannot assess insider or whale concentration
Critically shallow liquidity ($51.11K) vs high volume ($883.8K/day) — extreme slippage and exit risk
Anomalous total supply of 1 (0 decimals) — possible obfuscation of true tokenomics
Net sell pressure: $459.90K sells vs $423.91K buys in 24h — capital outflow
Unverified contract on PumpFun — no independent code audit
Single liquidity venue (PumpSwap) — no market depth redundancy

Mitigating factors

Not flagged as spam by data provider
Active social presence (Telegram, Twitter, Website) suggests some community infrastructure
2,132 unique buyers in 24h indicates broad retail interest
High transaction count (7,416 total trades in 24h) provides some price discovery

Suitable for

This token is NOT suitable for risk-averse or retail investors. The combination of unknown mutable authority, artificial holder inflation, missing top holder data, anomalous supply structure, and shallow liquidity creates an extremely high-risk profile. Only highly experienced traders with strict stop-losses, minimal position sizes, and full acceptance of total loss should consider any exposure. This token exhibits multiple characteristics commonly associated with pump-and-dump schemes.

SAVAGE presents as a high-risk PumpFun meme token with a 112.8% 24h pump but severe structural red flags including artificial holder inflation, unknown mutable authority, missing top holder data, and critically shallow liquidity. The risk/reward profile is extremely unfavorable for any position held beyond minutes. The token may offer short-term speculative momentum plays for experienced traders, but the fundamental data strongly suggests coordinated manipulation rather than organic growth.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued momentum pump driven by social media virality and retail FOMO, with the token breaking above $0.000362 resistance and sustaining elevated volume.

Active social channels (Telegram, Twitter, Website) could amplify retail FOMO
2,132 unique buyers in 24h shows broad interest that could sustain momentum
If the holder spike represents genuine new community members, network effects could drive further price appreciation
PumpFun tokens occasionally achieve 10-100x from pump phase before collapsing

Base Case

Token experiences continued high volatility with gradual price decay as the pump phase exhausts. Volume declines, holder count normalizes downward, and price settles significantly below current levels within 1–7 days.

The +1,505 holder spike is partially artificial and will partially reverse
Sell pressure continues to slightly exceed buy pressure
No major catalyst (viral social post, exchange listing) emerges to sustain momentum
Liquidity remains shallow, amplifying downside moves
Update authority does not execute an immediate rug pull but token decays organically

Bear Case

High probability

Rapid price collapse as coordinated actors exit, bot wallets disappear, and shallow liquidity amplifies the downside. Token returns to pre-pump levels near $0.000030 or lower.

Artificial holder inflation (+1,505 in 1 hour) reverses as bot wallets exit
Unknown mutable authority executes rug pull or metadata change
Sell pressure (52%) continues to exceed buy pressure (48%)
Shallow liquidity ($51.11K) means even moderate selling causes severe price impact
Historical 30-day stagnation at 84 holders suggests no organic community base

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 25, 08:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-25 08:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (Mint: ATBqqcqKumxQEgLBTbuL5iNMMk7DNPzwKNTi8XVSpump)
PumpSwap pair data (FueSKEc17u3j1Nb9PTFQfPS6kVo9JhUb8hPPKZ3PkVm7)
Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles, July 25 2026)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
Holder distribution and acquisition data
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 2 OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely constrained
Top holder data entirely unavailable — whale map and concentration analysis cannot be completed
Sniper data unavailable — smart money signals cannot be assessed
Supply concentration metrics return 0% for top 10 and top 100 — data anomaly, likely a feed error
Total formatted supply of 1 with 0 decimals is anomalous — true tokenomics unclear
Update authority is 'unknown' — cannot confirm or deny authority renouncement
Holder spike of +1,505 in 1 hour may reflect data lag or batch processing rather than real-time activity
Price % change fields for 5m/1h/6h/24h show inconsistent values (1h/6h/24h all show 0% despite clear price movement) — possible data feed issue
No historical price data beyond 2 candles — cannot assess longer-term trends

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The data analyzed contains multiple anomalies and red flags. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. This analysis is based solely on the on-chain data provided and does not account for off-chain developments, team background, or broader market conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Cyber Savage (SAVAGE) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 21, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Cyber Savage (SAVAGE)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 21, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Cyber Savage ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,589 addresses (2026-07-25 08:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Cyber Savage?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Cyber Savage liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-25 08:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $51,109.87. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Cyber Savage (SAVAGE)?

Is SAVAGE a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is NOT suitable for risk-averse or retail investors. The combination of unknown mutable authority, artificial holder inflation, missing top holder data, anomalous supply structure, and shallow liquidity creates an extremely high-risk profile. Only highly experienced traders with strict stop-losses, minimal position sizes, and full acceptance of total loss should consider any exposure. This token exhibits multiple characteristics commonly associated with pump-and-dump schemes.

What are the key risks of holding SAVAGE?

Mutable token with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or metadata manipulation • Artificial holder inflation: +1,505 holders in 1 hour after 30 days of zero growth — strong bot/manipulation signal • Top holder data completely unavailable — cannot assess insider or whale concentration