SAVAGE

Cyber Savage Price Today & AI Analysis

SAVAGE
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 25, 2026

ATBqqcqKumxQEgLBTbuL5iNMMk7DNPzwKNTi8XVSpump

$0.053555

FDV $3,502

LiveContract:ATBqqcqKumxQEgLBTbuL5iNMMk7DNPzwKNTi8XVSpumpChain:SolanaHolders:452Market cap:$3,502

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about SAVAGE

Report snapshotas of Jul 25, 08:17 AM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$51,110

Holders

1,589

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Cyber Savage (SAVAGE) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana with a total formatted supply of 1 (indicating extreme decimal manipulation or a non-standard supply structure), trading at ~$0.000286 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$274.86K. The token has experienced a dramatic 112.8% price surge in 24 hours, yet exhibits multiple severe red flags: the update authority is unknown and the token is mutable, top holder data is entirely unavailable, supply concentration metrics report 0% for top 10 and top 100 (data anomaly), and historical holder counts were flat at 84 for 30 consecutive days before a sudden spike to 1,589 holders — all within the last hour. This pattern is highly consistent with artificial activity, bot-driven holder inflation, or a coordinated pump scheme.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Total formatted supply of 1 — highly anomalous, likely a decimal/display artifact or intentional obfuscation
Holder count was exactly 84 for 30 straight days, then jumped +1,505 (95%) within a single hour — extreme manipulation signal
Top holder data entirely unavailable — prevents any concentration or whale analysis
Token is mutable with unknown update authority — maximum rug risk from authority perspective
112.8% price pump in 24h with sell pressure (52%) slightly exceeding buy pressure (48%) and more sellers than buyers (4,018 sells vs 3,398 buys)

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token has already pumped 112.8% in 24h and is showing a sharp intra-candle reversal. Candle [1] opened at $0.000186, spiked to $0.000309, then closed at $0.0000318 — a massive wick-down indicating aggressive selling into the pump. Candle [2] then recovered from $0.0000305 to close at $0.000180. The current price of $0.000286 sits near the upper range of recent candles. With sell pressure at 52% and 4,018 sells vs 3,398 buys, short-term downside is the higher-probability outcome. The artificial holder spike adds further instability.

Target low$0.000030
Target high$0.000362
Support: $0.000030 (candle [2] low), $0.000172 (candle [1] low)
Resistance: $0.000309 (candle [1] high), $0.000362 (candle [2] high)

Medium term

bearish
1–30 days

Given the mutable contract with unknown authority, the artificial holder inflation pattern, the absence of top holder data, and the shallow liquidity of only $51.11K, the medium-term outlook is strongly bearish. Tokens with these characteristics on PumpFun typically dump rapidly after the initial pump phase. Without verifiable organic growth or project fundamentals, sustained price appreciation is unlikely.

Catalysts
  • Potential rug pull or authority exploit given mutable token with unknown update authority
  • Holder count normalization as bot wallets exit
  • Continued sell pressure (52%) eroding price
  • Shallow liquidity ($51.11K) amplifying downside moves

Bullish factors

  • Strong 24h price appreciation of +112.8%
  • High transaction volume ($883K+ combined buy/sell in 24h) relative to $51.11K liquidity
  • 2,132 unique buyers in 24h suggesting broad interest
  • Active social presence (Telegram, Twitter, Website)

Bearish factors

  • Sell pressure exceeds buy pressure (52% vs 48%); more sells (4,018) than buys (3,398)
  • Candle [1] shows a severe wick-down from $0.000309 to close at $0.0000318 — dump signal
  • Holder count was flat at 84 for 30 days then spiked +1,505 in 1 hour — artificial inflation
  • Top holder data unavailable — cannot assess concentration or whale behavior
  • Token is mutable with unknown update authority — rug risk
  • Shallow liquidity of $51.11K vs $883K daily volume — extreme slippage risk
  • FDV of $274.86K vs $51.11K liquidity = very thin market depth
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to missing top holder data, anomalous supply metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%), unknown update authority, and the highly irregular holder spike pattern. The two available OHLC candles show extreme intra-candle volatility making price prediction unreliable. The data anomalies suggest possible data feed issues or deliberate obfuscation.

SAVAGE call history

Full track record →
Jul 25bearish
24h-99.0%
7d-99.0%
30d-98.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (07:00 UTC): O=$0.0000318, H=$0.000362, L=$0.0000305, C=$0.000180 — a strong bullish candle with a massive upper wick, suggesting a spike and partial rejection. Candle [1] (08:00 UTC): O=$0.000186, H=$0.000309, L=$0.000172, C=$0.0000318 — a bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern where price opened near the prior close, spiked to $0.000309, then collapsed to close at $0.0000318, erasing nearly all gains. This two-candle sequence shows a classic pump-and-dump wick pattern: rapid spike followed by aggressive sell-off. Current price of $0.000286 is above candle [1]'s close, suggesting a secondary recovery bounce, but the overall pattern remains bearish.

Trend

Short-term
sideways
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 48%Sell 52%

Short-term is highly volatile and effectively sideways given the extreme wicks in both directions. The medium-term trend is bearish given the 30-day stagnation at 84 holders, the pump-and-dump candle pattern, and the sell-heavy order flow.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000172 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.000030 (candle [2] low / near-zero floor)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000309 (candle [1] high)
Major$0.000362 (candle [2] high / all-time high in data)

The $0.000030 level represents the absolute floor seen in the data and acts as major support. Immediate support sits at $0.000172 (candle [1] low). On the upside, $0.000309 is immediate resistance (candle [1] high), with $0.000362 as the major resistance and apparent all-time high within the available data window. Current price of $0.000286 sits in the middle of this range.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish wick on candle [1]: opened $0.000186, spiked to $0.000309, collapsed to close $0.0000318 — classic pump-and-dump candle
  • Hammer/recovery on candle [2]: low of $0.0000305, closed at $0.000180 — partial recovery but with large upper wick suggesting resistance
  • Extreme intra-candle volatility: candle [2] range spans ~1,085% from low to high
  • Volume spike from near-zero to $883K+ in 24h — anomalous activity consistent with coordinated trading

Total holders1,589
24h Δ+95
7d Δ+95
30d Δ+95
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count was completely flat at 84 for the entire 30-day historical period (June 25 – July 24, 2026), then surged +1,505 holders (95% growth) within a single hour on July 25, coinciding with the 112.8% price pump. This is not organic growth — the simultaneous explosion in both price and holder count within one hour, after 30 days of zero movement, is a strong indicator of coordinated bot activity or artificial wallet creation to simulate demand.

The historical holder data is deeply anomalous. For 30 consecutive days (June 25 – July 24), the holder count was exactly 84 with zero net change every single day. Then on July 25, within a single hour, 1,505 new holders appeared — representing a 95% increase in total holders. This pattern is inconsistent with organic adoption. Legitimate tokens show gradual, variable holder growth. A perfectly flat 30-day count followed by an instantaneous +1,505 spike is a hallmark of artificial holder inflation, potentially via airdrop bots, wash trading, or coordinated wallet creation. The holder acquisition data confirms 1,586 of 1,589 holders acquired via swap, with only 3 via transfer and 0 via airdrop — but the timing anomaly remains a critical red flag.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available — data feed returned empty results

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for SAVAGE — the data feed returned no results for the top 20 holders. The supply concentration metrics report 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which is a data anomaly (mathematically impossible for any token with holders). This absence of data is itself a red flag, as it prevents any assessment of whale concentration, insider holdings, or distribution health. The token's total formatted supply of 1 (with 0 decimals) is also highly anomalous and may indicate a non-standard token structure. Distribution is classified as 'very_concentrated' due to the data anomaly and the inability to verify otherwise — the lack of transparency is treated conservatively. The whale distribution data (whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0) further confirms the data feed is not returning meaningful holder classification data.

Liquidity$51,110
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$423,910
Sell$459,900
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers2,132
Unique sellers1,216

Liquidity is critically shallow at $51.11K against a 24h trading volume of ~$883.8K — a volume-to-liquidity ratio of approximately 17.3:1. This means the pool is being turned over more than 17 times per day, creating extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position. The net flow is negative (outflow): sell volume ($459.90K) exceeds buy volume ($423.91K) by ~$35.99K, indicating net capital is leaving the token. While there are more unique buyers (2,132) than sellers (1,216), the higher average sell size suggests larger holders are distributing into retail buy pressure — a classic distribution pattern. The PumpSwap pair (FueSKEc17u3j1Nb9PTFQfPS6kVo9JhUb8hPPKZ3PkVm7) is the sole liquidity venue, meaning there is no alternative market depth. Any large sell order will face severe price impact.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (formatted, 0 decimals) — highly anomalous; likely a display artifact or non-standard token structure
FDV$274,860

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token's metadata presents multiple red flags. The total formatted supply is 1 with 0 decimals, which is mathematically inconsistent with 1,589 holders and $274.86K FDV — this strongly suggests a data display issue or deliberate obfuscation of the true supply structure. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the token is marked as 'mutable', meaning the token's metadata and potentially its behavior can be changed by whoever holds the update authority. This represents maximum authority risk. Neither mint authority nor freeze authority status can be confirmed as renounced given the 'unknown' update authority. The contract is unverified. The combination of mutable token, unknown authority, unverified contract, and anomalous supply data creates a high rug risk profile from an authority perspective.

Volatility
high

112.8% price surge in 24h with intra-candle swings of over 1,000% (candle [2] range: $0.0000305 to $0.000362). Extreme volatility makes position sizing and exit timing nearly impossible.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $51.11K against $883.8K daily volume (17:1 ratio). Any position above a few hundred dollars will face severe slippage. Single liquidity venue on PumpSwap with no alternative markets.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is entirely unavailable and supply concentration metrics return 0% — a data anomaly that prevents verification. The inability to assess concentration is treated as high risk by default. The token's anomalous supply structure (formatted supply of 1) adds further uncertainty.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available. However, the sudden +1,505 holder spike in 1 hour after 30 days of stagnation suggests coordinated entry that could reverse rapidly. The higher sell volume vs buy volume indicates some early participants may already be distributing.

Authority
high

Token is mutable with unknown update authority. Neither mint nor freeze authority can be confirmed as renounced. Unverified contract. This represents the highest possible authority risk — the token can be modified by an unknown party at any time.

Key risks

  • Mutable token with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or metadata manipulation
  • Artificial holder inflation: +1,505 holders in 1 hour after 30 days of zero growth — strong bot/manipulation signal
  • Top holder data completely unavailable — cannot assess insider or whale concentration
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($51.11K) vs high volume ($883.8K/day) — extreme slippage and exit risk
  • Anomalous total supply of 1 (0 decimals) — possible obfuscation of true tokenomics
  • Net sell pressure: $459.90K sells vs $423.91K buys in 24h — capital outflow
  • Unverified contract on PumpFun — no independent code audit
  • Single liquidity venue (PumpSwap) — no market depth redundancy

Mitigating factors

  • Not flagged as spam by data provider
  • Active social presence (Telegram, Twitter, Website) suggests some community infrastructure
  • 2,132 unique buyers in 24h indicates broad retail interest
  • High transaction count (7,416 total trades in 24h) provides some price discovery
Suitable for: This token is NOT suitable for risk-averse or retail investors. The combination of unknown mutable authority, artificial holder inflation, missing top holder data, anomalous supply structure, and shallow liquidity creates an extremely high-risk profile. Only highly experienced traders with strict stop-losses, minimal position sizes, and full acceptance of total loss should consider any exposure. This token exhibits multiple characteristics commonly associated with pump-and-dump schemes.

SAVAGE presents as a high-risk PumpFun meme token with a 112.8% 24h pump but severe structural red flags including artificial holder inflation, unknown mutable authority, missing top holder data, and critically shallow liquidity. The risk/reward profile is extremely unfavorable for any position held beyond minutes. The token may offer short-term speculative momentum plays for experienced traders, but the fundamental data strongly suggests coordinated manipulation rather than organic growth.

Bull case (low)

Continued momentum pump driven by social media virality and retail FOMO, with the token breaking above $0.000362 resistance and sustaining elevated volume.

  • Active social channels (Telegram, Twitter, Website) could amplify retail FOMO
  • 2,132 unique buyers in 24h shows broad interest that could sustain momentum
  • If the holder spike represents genuine new community members, network effects could drive further price appreciation
  • PumpFun tokens occasionally achieve 10-100x from pump phase before collapsing

Base case

Token experiences continued high volatility with gradual price decay as the pump phase exhausts. Volume declines, holder count normalizes downward, and price settles significantly below current levels within 1–7 days.

  • The +1,505 holder spike is partially artificial and will partially reverse
  • Sell pressure continues to slightly exceed buy pressure
  • No major catalyst (viral social post, exchange listing) emerges to sustain momentum
  • Liquidity remains shallow, amplifying downside moves
  • Update authority does not execute an immediate rug pull but token decays organically

Bear case (high)

Rapid price collapse as coordinated actors exit, bot wallets disappear, and shallow liquidity amplifies the downside. Token returns to pre-pump levels near $0.000030 or lower.

  • Artificial holder inflation (+1,505 in 1 hour) reverses as bot wallets exit
  • Unknown mutable authority executes rug pull or metadata change
  • Sell pressure (52%) continues to exceed buy pressure (48%)
  • Shallow liquidity ($51.11K) means even moderate selling causes severe price impact
  • Historical 30-day stagnation at 84 holders suggests no organic community base

GeneratedJul 25, 08:17 AM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-07-25T08:00 UTC. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — severely limited technical analysis window.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (Mint: ATBqqcqKumxQEgLBTbuL5iNMMk7DNPzwKNTi8XVSpump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (FueSKEc17u3j1Nb9PTFQfPS6kVo9JhUb8hPPKZ3PkVm7)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles, July 25 2026)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
  • Holder distribution and acquisition data
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely constrained
  • Top holder data entirely unavailable — whale map and concentration analysis cannot be completed
  • Sniper data unavailable — smart money signals cannot be assessed
  • Supply concentration metrics return 0% for top 10 and top 100 — data anomaly, likely a feed error
  • Total formatted supply of 1 with 0 decimals is anomalous — true tokenomics unclear
  • Update authority is 'unknown' — cannot confirm or deny authority renouncement
  • Holder spike of +1,505 in 1 hour may reflect data lag or batch processing rather than real-time activity
  • Price % change fields for 5m/1h/6h/24h show inconsistent values (1h/6h/24h all show 0% despite clear price movement) — possible data feed issue
  • No historical price data beyond 2 candles — cannot assess longer-term trends

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The data analyzed contains multiple anomalies and red flags. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. This analysis is based solely on the on-chain data provided and does not account for off-chain developments, team background, or broader market conditions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (formatted, 0 decimals) — highly anomalous; likely a display artifact or non-standard token structure

Key Risks

Mutable token with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or metadata manipulation
Artificial holder inflation: +1,505 holders in 1 hour after 30 days of zero growth — strong bot/manipulation signal
Top holder data completely unavailable — cannot assess insider or whale concentration
Critically shallow liquidity ($51.11K) vs high volume ($883.8K/day) — extreme slippage and exit risk

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper analysis data is available for SAVAGE. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper metrics. The absence of sniper data, combined with the anomalous holder spike (+1,505 holders in 1 hour after 30 days of stagnation at 84), raises concerns about bot-driven activity rather than genuine smart money accumulation. The 2,132 unique buyers in 24h vs only 1,216 unique sellers suggests more wallets are entering than exiting, but the higher sell volume ($459.90K vs $423.91K) indicates those sellers are moving larger positions.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — cannot assess sniper concentration or PnL state.

Unknown — no sniper data available. The 30-day holder stagnation at 84 wallets followed by a sudden +1,505 spike in 1 hour is highly suspicious and may indicate coordinated bot activity rather than organic early buyer accumulation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Cyber Savage (SAVAGE)?

The token has already pumped 112.8% in 24h and is showing a sharp intra-candle reversal. Candle [1] opened at $0.000186, spiked to $0.000309, then closed at $0.0000318 — a massive wick-down indicating aggressive selling into the pump. Candle [2] then recovered from $0.0000305 to close at $0.000180. The current price of $0.000286 sits near the upper range of recent candles. With sell pressure at 52% and 4,018 sells vs 3,398 buys, short-term downside is the higher-probability outcome. The artificial holder spike adds further instability. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000030 to $0.000362.

Is SAVAGE a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is NOT suitable for risk-averse or retail investors. The combination of unknown mutable authority, artificial holder inflation, missing top holder data, anomalous supply structure, and shallow liquidity creates an extremely high-risk profile. Only highly experienced traders with strict stop-losses, minimal position sizes, and full acceptance of total loss should consider any exposure. This token exhibits multiple characteristics commonly associated with pump-and-dump schemes.

How are SAVAGE holders trending?

Cyber Savage currently has 1,589 holders and is growing (24h: 95, 7d: 95, 30d: 95). The historical holder data is deeply anomalous. For 30 consecutive days (June 25 – July 24), the holder count was exactly 84 with zero net change every single day. Then on July 25, within a single hour, 1,505 new holders appeared — representing a 95% increase in total holders. This pattern is inconsistent with organic adoption. Legitimate tokens show gradual, variable holder growth. A perfectly flat 30-day count followed by an instantaneous +1,505 spike is a hallmark of artificial holder inflation, potentially via airdrop bots, wash trading, or coordinated wallet creation. The holder acquisition data confirms 1,586 of 1,589 holders acquired via swap, with only 3 via transfer and 0 via airdrop — but the timing anomaly remains a critical red flag.

What does sniper activity look like for SAVAGE?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding SAVAGE?

Mutable token with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or metadata manipulation • Artificial holder inflation: +1,505 holders in 1 hour after 30 days of zero growth — strong bot/manipulation signal • Top holder data completely unavailable — cannot assess insider or whale concentration

Track SAVAGE