ABIGAIL

ABIGAIL Price Prediction 2026

ABIGAIL
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 26, 2026

AHU883pC5dkm5RwrbhxYy8VndCRv2KrM3LhxWqaBpump

$0.051578

FDV $1,577

LiveContract:AHU883pC5dkm5RwrbhxYy8VndCRv2KrM3LhxWqaBpumpChain:SolanaHolders:76Market cap:$1,577

More tokens on Solana

BIGTROUT

BIGTROUT

The Big Trout

$0.0517643.8%
MC $1.8K
HOE

HOE

Horizon of Eternity

$0.0518240.0%
MC $1.8K
ACTGAY

ACTGAY

Act I: The Gay Prophecy

$0.0514900.0%
MC $1.5K
SANA

SANA

サーナ

$0.0513450.0%
MC $1.3K
CRINGE

CRINGE

CRINGELORD

$0.0515720.0%
MC $1.6K
arc

arc

AI Rig Complex

$0.060614.9%
MC $60.63M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about ABIGAIL

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of May 26, 07:17 PM
FDV

$2,496

Liquidity

$0

Holders

161

Snipers

42

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

ABIGAIL (ABIGAIL) is a Pump.fun-launched meme/character token on Solana with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens and a fully diluted valuation of approximately $2,496. The token has experienced a catastrophic 95.17% price decline in the past 24 hours, collapsing from a recent high of ~$0.0000589 to the current price of ~$0.00000250. On-chain data reveals extreme supply concentration (top holder controls 84.08% of supply via the PumpSwap liquidity pair address), zero reported liquidity, and a holder base of only 161 wallets. The token exhibits all hallmarks of a high-risk micro-cap speculative asset with significant red flags.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme supply concentration: top 10 holders control 97.18% of supply
84.08% of supply sits in the PumpSwap pair address (DWgTwX6neVwCUPMnCDioq5UtSHx9FgaBPymG3XTGekV7), suggesting most supply is locked in the liquidity pool or has been dumped there
Token launched on Pump.fun (mint suffix 'pump'), indicating a bonding-curve origin with migration to PumpSwap
Catastrophic 95.17% 24h price decline with sell pressure dominating (51.9% sell vs 48.1% buy)
Holder count surged from 31 (stable for 30 days) to 161 in the last 24h, coinciding with the price spike and subsequent crash
20 identified snipers, majority in profit, suggesting early buyers extracted value at the expense of later entrants

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
24–72 hours

The token has already collapsed 95.17% in 24 hours from a high of ~$0.0000589 to ~$0.00000250. With zero reported liquidity, only 161 holders, sell pressure dominating (51.9%), and most snipers already in profit and having sold, further downside or complete illiquidity is the most probable short-term outcome. A brief dead-cat bounce is possible given the 5m change of -4.44% suggesting continued selling, but no structural support exists.

Target low$0.000000500
Target high$0.000005000
Support: $0.000002402 (candle [1] low), $0.000000500 (psychological floor near zero)
Resistance: $0.000033763 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close), $0.000048629 (candle [2] open), $0.000058869 (candle [3] high — all-time high in data)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

With $0.00 reported liquidity, a FDV of only ~$2,496, 161 holders, and no verified contract or renounced authorities, the medium-term outlook is deeply bearish. The token is likely to become illiquid or effectively worthless unless a coordinated community effort drives new buyers — which is highly unlikely given the structural damage from the initial dump.

Catalysts
  • Any viral social media moment could temporarily spike price given tiny market cap
  • New liquidity injection by the project team
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifting all micro-caps

Bullish factors

  • Tiny FDV (~$2,496) means even small capital inflows could produce large percentage gains
  • 24h buyer count (2,772) significantly exceeds current holder count (161), suggesting many buyers already exited — selling pressure may be exhausted
  • Some snipers still hold positions (wallets 7, 9, 10 show remaining balances), indicating not all early money has exited
  • Token migrated to PumpSwap, suggesting it passed the Pump.fun bonding curve threshold

Bearish factors

  • 95.17% price collapse in 24 hours — catastrophic destruction of value
  • Zero reported total liquidity — effectively illiquid
  • Top holder (84.08%) is the PumpSwap pair address, indicating extreme concentration risk
  • Top 10 holders control 97.18% of supply
  • Holder base of only 161 wallets — extremely thin community
  • Most snipers (17 of 20) realized profits, meaning early money has largely exited
  • No verified contract, unknown update authority
  • Historical holder count was flat at 31 for 30 days prior to the pump — no organic growth
  • 1h price change of -97.75% confirms ongoing freefall
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extremely thin liquidity ($0.00 reported), tiny holder base (161 wallets), missing sniper cost-basis data, unknown mint/freeze authority status, and the token's very recent and volatile trading history spanning only a few hours of meaningful price action.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle [3] (17:00 UTC): O=$0.0000338, H=$0.0000589, L=$0.0000338, C=$0.0000507 — a bullish candle with a strong upper wick suggesting initial buying momentum. Candle [2] (18:00 UTC): O=$0.0000486, H=$0.0000486, L=$0.0000395, C=$0.0000338 — a bearish engulfing/red candle with no upper wick, open equals high, indicating immediate sell pressure from the open; volume spiked to $1,041,024. Candle [1] (19:00 UTC): O=$0.0000338, H=$0.0000338, L=$0.00000240, C=$0.00000250 — a catastrophic crash candle; open equals high (bearish from the start), price collapsed 92.9% intracandle to a low of $0.00000240, closing near the low at $0.00000250. Volume dropped to $88,809, suggesting the dump was fast and liquidity dried up immediately.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 48%Sell 52%

The 3-candle sequence shows a clear pump-and-dump pattern: a brief spike to $0.0000589 followed by two consecutive bearish candles with accelerating sell pressure. The current price of $0.00000250 is 95.7% below the 3-candle high. Both short and medium-term trends are firmly bearish with no technical reversal signals present.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000002402 (candle [1] intracandle low)
Major$0.000000500 (psychological near-zero floor)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000033763 (candle [1] open = candle [2] close)
Major$0.000058869 (candle [3] all-time high in dataset)

The only meaningful support is the candle [1] low of $0.00000240, which is barely below the current price of $0.00000250 — the token is trading at the absolute bottom of its known range. All prior price levels ($0.0000338, $0.0000486, $0.0000589) now serve as overhead resistance. A recovery to even the $0.0000338 level would require a ~13x move from current price.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump pattern: sharp spike followed by immediate collapse across 3 candles
  • Bearish engulfing: candle [2] opens at its high and closes below candle [3] close
  • Crash candle [1]: open equals high (bearish gap), 92.9% intracandle collapse, close near low
  • Volume climax at dump peak (candle [2]: $1.04M) followed by volume exhaustion (candle [1]: $88.8K)
  • No higher highs or accumulation pattern — single spike with no base formation

Total holders161
24h Δ+130
7d Δ+130
30d Δ+130
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

Holder count was flat at 31 for the entire 30-day historical period (Apr 26 – May 25, 2026), then surged to 161 (+130, +419%) in the last 24 hours — perfectly coinciding with the price pump and subsequent crash. This is a classic pump-driven holder spike, not organic growth. The 1h holder change of -658 (-410%) is anomalous and likely a data artifact or reflects rapid wallet turnover during the crash.

The historical holder data shows 31 holders with zero net change for 30 consecutive days (Apr 26 – May 25, 2026), indicating the token was dormant or in a pre-launch state. The sudden jump to 161 holders in the last 24 hours is entirely correlated with the trading event (pump and dump). The 7d and 30d growth figures both equal the 24h figure (+130), confirming all growth occurred in a single day. Growth is not accelerating in any meaningful organic sense — it is a one-time event spike. The -658 holder change in the last 1 hour is highly suspicious and may indicate data inconsistency or mass exit of temporary holders post-crash.

Top 10 hold97.18%
Top 100 hold100.51%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

DWgTwX6neVwCUPMnCDioq5UtSHx9FgaBPymG3XTGekV7

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address — confirmed as the trading pair in price data)

84.08%

3cXRtfv9dqtp1aznMnaiyaUAjGMXP9P9rWpMXzfM6dAK

Individual whale / early holder

3.63%

5sESsngg8Q5bnDF7cewJLaRBR7hGasCLKozacRKKUd7j

Individual whale / early holder

3.08%

6bvZxaAd6xwDLjg3czkirqe3YmqirBPPU3W8k9w37Y6Z

Individual whale / early holder

2.31%

5qSMpL6CFKb4HS9cx4PzJuPtyZQKYgdes9Jd5r6suBzm

Individual holder / shark

0.99%

Supply distribution is extremely concentrated. The #1 holder (84.08%) is the PumpSwap pair address DWgTwX6neVwCUPMnCDioq5UtSHx9FgaBPymG3XTGekV7 — this is the liquidity pool itself, meaning 84% of supply is technically 'in the pool' but with $0.00 reported liquidity, this is effectively stranded or represents the token side of a drained pool. Holders #2–#4 control 3.63%, 3.08%, and 2.31% respectively — these are likely early buyers or team wallets. The top 10 collectively hold 97.18% of supply, and top 100 hold 100.51% (slight rounding artifact). With only 161 total holders, distribution is dangerously concentrated. The overall sentiment is distributing, as evidenced by the sell-heavy trading session and sniper exits.

Liquidity$0.00
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$585,560
Sell$631,060
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers2,772
Unique sellers3,060

Total reported liquidity is $0.00, which is the most critical red flag in this analysis. Despite $1.216M in combined 24h volume ($585.56K buys + $631.06K sells), the pool appears to have been drained or the liquidity measurement reflects post-dump state. The net flow is negative (outflow): sell volume exceeds buy volume by ~$45.5K, and unique sellers (3,060) outnumber unique buyers (2,772). The fact that 2,772 unique buyers participated but only 161 holders remain suggests the vast majority of buyers sold within the same session. Slippage risk is extreme — with $0 liquidity, any meaningful trade would move the price dramatically or fail entirely. The token is effectively illiquid at current state.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000 ABIGAIL
FDV$2,496.26

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is 1,000,000,000 tokens (1 billion), standard for Pump.fun launches. The FDV is $2,496.26 at current price — an extremely low valuation reflecting the post-crash state. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is not verified. Mutable is set to 'false', which is a positive signal suggesting token metadata cannot be changed. However, mint authority and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the data — these cannot be confirmed as renounced. The 'pump' suffix in the mint address confirms Pump.fun origin. Rug risk from authorities is classified as unknown due to insufficient data, but the unverified contract and unknown authority status are concerning. The token description ('cozy character-led token... cute enough to remember, clean enough to trust') is generic meme-token marketing language with no substantive utility claims.

Volatility
high

95.17% price decline in 24 hours. 1h change of -97.75%. The token experienced a full pump-and-dump cycle within approximately 3 hours of trading data, representing extreme volatility.

Liquidity
high

$0.00 reported total liquidity on PumpSwap. Despite $1.2M in 24h volume, the pool appears drained. Any position cannot be reliably exited without catastrophic slippage.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 97.18% of supply. The #1 holder (PumpSwap pair) holds 84.08%. Holders #2–#4 each hold 2–4%, creating extreme dump risk if any large holder sells.

SniperDump
high

20 identified snipers, 17 of whom realized positive PnL (up to +149.7%). High sell-through rate confirms most sniper capital has already exited. Remaining sniper balances are near-zero ($0–$4), suggesting the dump has largely occurred but ongoing pressure from remaining holders is possible.

Authority
medium

Update authority is unknown. Contract is not verified. Mutable is false (positive). Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The Pump.fun launch mechanism provides some standardization, but unknown authority status prevents full clearance.

Key risks

  • Complete illiquidity — $0.00 reported liquidity makes exit impossible at scale
  • 97.18% supply concentration in top 10 holders creates permanent dump overhang
  • Unverified contract with unknown mint/freeze authority
  • Token has already lost 95.17% of value — further decline to near-zero is probable
  • Only 161 holders — insufficient community to sustain price or generate organic demand
  • Historical holder stagnation (31 holders for 30 days) suggests no pre-existing community
  • All trading activity appears to be a single pump-and-dump event with no follow-through

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable=false prevents metadata manipulation
  • Token successfully migrated from Pump.fun bonding curve to PumpSwap (passed graduation threshold)
  • FDV of ~$2,496 is so low that even minimal new capital could produce large % moves
  • Sell pressure may be exhausted given 2,772 unique buyers vs 161 remaining holders
  • Token has social links (Telegram, Twitter, website) suggesting some project infrastructure
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of invested capital. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. Current state suggests the token is effectively at end-of-life unless significant new capital and community development occurs.

ABIGAIL is a Pump.fun-launched meme token that has undergone a classic pump-and-dump cycle, losing 95.17% of its value in 24 hours. The investment case is overwhelmingly negative: zero liquidity, extreme concentration, a tiny holder base of 161 wallets, and smart money (snipers) having already exited at profit. The only speculative bull case rests on the token's near-zero valuation acting as a lottery ticket for viral social media attention.

Bull case (low)

Viral social media revival: The token's character-based branding and existing social infrastructure (Telegram, Twitter, website) attract a new wave of buyers. New liquidity is injected, the holder base expands significantly, and the ~$2,496 FDV acts as a springboard for outsized percentage gains on minimal capital.

  • Viral meme or influencer promotion on Twitter/Telegram
  • New liquidity provision by team or whales
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally
  • Exhaustion of sell pressure creating a vacuum for buyers

Base case

Prolonged illiquidity and slow decay: The token trades sporadically at near-zero prices with minimal volume. A small number of holders remain, occasionally generating micro-volume spikes. The token neither recovers meaningfully nor attracts enough attention to pump again. FDV drifts toward $0–$500 over the next 30 days.

  • No new significant liquidity injection
  • No viral social media catalyst
  • Remaining 161 holders gradually exit or hold dormant positions
  • Solana meme-coin market remains competitive with thousands of alternatives

Bear case (high)

Complete collapse to zero: With $0 liquidity, 161 holders, and no organic community growth over 30 days prior to the pump, the token fails to attract new buyers. Remaining holders gradually sell or abandon positions. The token becomes permanently illiquid and worthless.

  • Zero liquidity prevents meaningful trading
  • 97.18% supply concentration creates permanent overhead pressure
  • No utility or fundamental value proposition
  • Smart money has already exited — no informed buyers remain
  • Historical 30-day stagnation at 31 holders suggests no real community

GeneratedMay 26, 07:17 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 19:00–19:30 UTC on May 26, 2026. OHLC data covers only 3 hourly candles (17:00–19:00 UTC). Price and holder data are near-real-time.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (Mint: AHU883pC5dkm5RwrbhxYy8VndCRv2KrM3LhxWqaBpump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (DWgTwX6neVwCUPMnCDioq5UtSHx9FgaBPymG3XTGekV7)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 candles, 17:00–19:00 UTC May 26 2026)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buyer/seller counts, price changes)
  • Top 20 holder distribution data
  • 30-day historical holder series (daily)
  • Sniper analysis (20 wallets, first 1000 blocks)
  • Token metadata (name, symbol, decimals, supply, FDV, social links)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Sniper cost basis (USD sniped) is unknown for all 20 snipers — PnL percentages cannot be fully validated
  • Sniper token balances are unknown for most wallets — concentration calculation is estimated
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may reflect data lag or pool drain; actual tradeable liquidity unclear
  • Mint authority and freeze authority status are unknown — rug risk from authorities cannot be fully assessed
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm renouncement
  • Historical holder data shows only 30 days and was flat at 31 for the entire period — limited baseline
  • The -658 holder change in 1h is likely a data artifact and has been noted but not used as primary signal
  • Top 100 concentration of 100.51% is a rounding artifact in source data

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The analyst has no position in ABIGAIL. Past price action is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decision.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000 ABIGAIL

Key Risks

•Complete illiquidity — $0.00 reported liquidity makes exit impossible at scale
•97.18% supply concentration in top 10 holders creates permanent dump overhang
•Unverified contract with unknown mint/freeze authority
•Token has already lost 95.17% of value — further decline to near-zero is probable

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

medium confidence
Low risk

Of 20 identified snipers, 17 show positive realized PnL percentages ranging from +1.6% to +149.7%, with only 1 sniper (8FG69Z2LSzqzTNmuuchLo4zeiX96XSq7tzVfSYknNnDK) showing a loss (-7.9%). Three snipers show 0% realized PnL with small remaining balances ($0–$4), suggesting they are still holding near-worthless positions. The sell-through rate is high — the majority of snipers have already sold their positions. Total sniper cost basis is unknown (sniped USD amounts not provided), but realized profits are confirmed across most wallets. Sniper concentration as a percentage of total supply cannot be precisely calculated due to missing balance data, but given only 161 current holders and 20 snipers, snipers likely represented a meaningful early share. The smart money has largely exited.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration2.00%
PnL stateMostly In Profit
Sell-through rateHigh
Profit-taking risk
low

Top sniper (CBoKT2eteDiokehKuRfWfE7Caf7A4GBtn3YFEbDfu3DM) sold $2,801; sniper 20 (5LgtdXfkiUMcJbuvJXgVp8wAr51ZmffM7oeXoqDUcza5) sold $750 at +149.7% PnL. Combined top 2 snipers extracted ~$3,551 in realized gains.

Negative — early buyers (snipers) have predominantly sold their positions at profit, extracting value from the token. The high sell-through rate and positive PnL across 17/20 snipers indicates the pump was orchestrated or at minimum exploited by informed early entrants who exited before the collapse.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for ABIGAIL (ABIGAIL)?

The token has already collapsed 95.17% in 24 hours from a high of ~$0.0000589 to ~$0.00000250. With zero reported liquidity, only 161 holders, sell pressure dominating (51.9%), and most snipers already in profit and having sold, further downside or complete illiquidity is the most probable short-term outcome. A brief dead-cat bounce is possible given the 5m change of -4.44% suggesting continued selling, but no structural support exists. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000000500 to $0.000005000.

Is ABIGAIL a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.4/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of invested capital. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. Current state suggests the token is effectively at end-of-life unless significant new capital and community development occurs.

How are ABIGAIL holders trending?

ABIGAIL currently has 161 holders and is growing (24h: 130, 7d: 130, 30d: 130). The historical holder data shows 31 holders with zero net change for 30 consecutive days (Apr 26 – May 25, 2026), indicating the token was dormant or in a pre-launch state. The sudden jump to 161 holders in the last 24 hours is entirely correlated with the trading event (pump and dump). The 7d and 30d growth figures both equal the 24h figure (+130), confirming all growth occurred in a single day. Growth is not accelerating in any meaningful organic sense — it is a one-time event spike. The -658 holder change in the last 1 hour is highly suspicious and may indicate data inconsistency or mass exit of temporary holders post-crash.

What does sniper activity look like for ABIGAIL?

Snipers hold roughly 2.00% of supply with PnL state "mostly_in_profit" and sell-through rate "high". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding ABIGAIL?

Complete illiquidity — $0.00 reported liquidity makes exit impossible at scale • 97.18% supply concentration in top 10 holders creates permanent dump overhang • Unverified contract with unknown mint/freeze authority

← Back to all predictions

Track ABIGAIL