Do Alpacas Really Wear Socks? Price Today & AI Analysis

ALPACASSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 20, 2026

$0.0₅5357

Contract

Live

AE7gr74vQqdYhMEGQCdZRZjHn5TovkCJbWwirgDkpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

652

Market cap

$5,357

At a $1M market cap, $ALPACAS would be $0.001000 (187x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is ALPACAS a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 1

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

3.2%5 snipers, 4 bundlers still holding

The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about ALPACAS

3 free answers a day

More tokens on Solana

pibblepibble$0.0₅2848+0.0%MC $2.8K

CYCLECycle$0.0₅1925+0.0%MC $1.9K

LmaocoinLmaocoin$0.0₅2217+0.0%MC $2.2K

LOUIEThe Miracle Duck$0.0₅8128-1.6%MC $7.3K

DLMDog Lives Matter$0.0₅2249+0.0%MC $2.2K

ZECZcash$1,205.6-3.5%MC $123.16M

Do Alpacas Really Wear Socks?: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-20 22:47 UTC

Holder addresses

191

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$47,700.07

How concentrated is Do Alpacas Really Wear Socks? ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 191 addresses (2026-06-20 22:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Do Alpacas Really Wear Socks??: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Do Alpacas Really Wear Socks? liquidity falling?: As of 2026-06-20 22:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $47,700.07. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-20 22:47 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 20, 10:47 PM UTC

FDV

$182,427

Liquidity

$47,700.07

Holders

191

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

ALPACAS (Do Alpacas Really Wear Socks?) is an extremely new PumpSwap meme token on Solana (mint: AE7gr74vQqdYhMEGQCdZRZjHn5TovkCJbWwirgDkpump) with a total supply of ~1B tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$182K–$193K. The token sat dormant with only 2 holders from late May through mid-June 2026, then exploded to 191 holders within roughly 48 hours. The 24h price change of +1,057% is accompanied by extreme sell pressure (81% of volume is sells), shallow liquidity ($47.7K), and no verified contract, social links, or description. This is a very high-risk, speculative micro-cap meme token in its earliest stage.

Key points

Extreme 24h price surge of +1,057% from a near-zero base
Token was dormant for ~30 days with only 2 holders before sudden activation on June 18
Holder base grew 99% in 7 days (from 2 to 191), almost entirely via swaps (183/191)
Severe sell-side dominance: 81% sell pressure, 785 sells vs 265 buys in 24h
No social links, no description, unverified contract — minimal transparency

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token is trading at ~$0.000182 after a +1,057% 24h pump. OHLC data shows the price peaked near $0.000193 (candle [1] low field appears inverted — likely a data anomaly; the highest close observed is ~$0.000053 in candle [2]) with the most recent candles showing a sharp spike and partial retracement. Sell pressure at 81% and 785 sells vs 265 buys strongly suggest continued distribution. Short-term direction is bearish with high probability of mean reversion toward the $0.000030–$0.000050 range.

Target low

$0.000020

Target high

$0.000053

Support: $0.000032 (repeated open/close cluster in candles [8]–[11]), $0.000022 (candle [16] level), $0.000019 (candle [17] base)
Resistance: $0.000053 (candle [2]/[3] close/high cluster), $0.000063 (candle [3] high), $0.000081 (candle [9] low — likely spike high)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

Without social presence, verified contract, or utility, sustaining price above pump levels is unlikely. The token's 30-day dormancy followed by a sudden pump-and-distribute pattern is a classic low-cap meme lifecycle. Unless new catalysts emerge (listings, community growth, social media traction), price is likely to retrace toward pre-pump levels near $0.000019–$0.000022.

Catalysts

Any social media viral moment or influencer mention could re-ignite buying
New exchange listing or aggregator visibility
Broader Solana meme coin market rally
Failure to develop community would accelerate decline

Bullish factors

Explosive 24h price appreciation of +1,057% signals strong initial speculative interest
Holder count grew from 2 to 191 in ~48 hours, showing rapid community formation
PumpSwap listing provides accessible on-chain liquidity
Mutable=false metadata reduces one vector of rug risk

Bearish factors

81% sell pressure (67.94K sell volume vs 15.92K buy volume in 24h)
785 sells vs only 265 buys — sellers outnumber buyers nearly 3:1
No social links, no description, unverified contract — near-zero transparency
Token was dormant for ~30 days with only 2 holders before sudden activation
Shallow liquidity of only $47.7K makes large exits highly impactful
Top holder concentration data unavailable — distribution unknown
FDV of ~$182K–$193K is entirely speculative with no fundamental backing

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the token's extreme youth (effectively launched June 18, 2026), absence of fundamental data (no description, no socials, no verified contract), highly anomalous OHLC data (some candles show L > H which may indicate data feed issues), and the unpredictable nature of micro-cap meme tokens. The 1,057% 24h move makes any price target highly speculative.

ALPACAS call history

Full track record →

Jun 20bearish@ $0.000182

24h+77.0%

7d+142.5%

30d-64.6%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: AE7gr7...pump
Total Supply: 999,999,848.945102 ALPACAS

Key Risks

30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump is a classic pre-coordinated launch pattern
81% sell pressure with 320 sellers vs 80 buyers — active distribution in progress
No social links, no description, unverified contract — near-zero project transparency
Top holder concentration data unavailable — cannot assess true distribution

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

17 hourly candles are available spanning June 19–20, 2026. Note: several candles exhibit L > H values (e.g., candle [1]: H=0.0000527, L=0.0001933; candle [8]: H=0.0000322, L=0.0000612; candle [9]: H=0.0000322, L=0.0000810), which are physically impossible and suggest a data feed anomaly where High and Low fields may be swapped in the source. Analysis proceeds treating the larger value as the true high and smaller as the true low. The overall picture shows a base around $0.000019–$0.000022 (candles [16]–[17]), a gradual grind up through $0.000032–$0.000039 (candles [8]–[14]), a spike to ~$0.000063–$0.000081 intraday, and the most recent candle closing near $0.000046 with high volume (8,778 USD). The price has not held its spike highs.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term trend is up from the $0.000019 base (candle [17]) to current ~$0.000046–$0.000053 range — a multi-hundred-percent move. However, the short-term (last 2–3 candles) shows a failure to hold the spike high near $0.000081 and a retracement, indicating short-term distribution and downward pressure.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

19%

Sell

81%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000045 (recent candle [1] close and candle [3] close cluster)

Major support

$0.000019–$0.000022 (candle [16]–[17] base, pre-pump origin)

Immediate resistance

$0.000053 (candle [2] high / candle [5]–[6] close area)

Major resistance

$0.000081 (candle [9] spike high — likely the 24h peak)

The $0.000032 level acted as a consolidation zone across candles [8]–[11] and represents a key intermediate support. A break below $0.000032 would open the path to the pre-pump base near $0.000019–$0.000022. Resistance at $0.000053 has been tested multiple times; a sustained break above would target the spike high near $0.000081.

Notable patterns

Climax volume spike in candle [2] ($40K volume) followed by declining volume — classic pump exhaustion
Failure to hold spike highs (~$0.000081) with price retracing to $0.000046 — bearish rejection
Multi-candle consolidation at $0.000032 (candles [8]–[11]) acting as prior resistance now potential support
Possible inverted candle data (L > H in multiple candles) — data quality concern
Base-building pattern from $0.000019 to $0.000022 over candles [16]–[17] before breakout

Liquidity

$47,700.07

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is extremely shallow at $47.7K on a single PumpSwap pool (HCGVhwaU61UWipP9Ngamg2Rnd3L4XGdMzrTZT7JJeonR). With an FDV of ~$182K–$193K, the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 25%, which is low and means even moderate-sized sells will cause significant price impact. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $67.94K in sell volume vs $15.92K in buy volume represents a net outflow of ~$52K. Sellers (320 unique) outnumber buyers (80 unique) by 4:1. Slippage risk is high — any position larger than a few hundred dollars will face meaningful slippage given the shallow pool depth. The token trades exclusively on PumpSwap with no other venues, concentrating all liquidity risk in a single pool.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,848.945102 ALPACAS

FDV

$182,426.68

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
+1,057% price move in 24 hours from a near-zero base. Extreme volatility in both directions is expected. The token can lose 80%+ of its value as quickly as it gained it.
Liquidityhigh
Only $47.7K total liquidity on a single PumpSwap pool. High slippage on any meaningful position. A single large seller could collapse the price significantly.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump is a classic pre-coordinated launch pattern
81% sell pressure with 320 sellers vs 80 buyers — active distribution in progress
No social links, no description, unverified contract — near-zero project transparency
Top holder concentration data unavailable — cannot assess true distribution
Shallow $47.7K liquidity makes price extremely vulnerable to large sells
Single trading venue (PumpSwap) with no diversified liquidity
Token is only ~2 days old with no track record
Mint/freeze authority status unconfirmed

Mitigating factors

Mutable=false metadata reduces post-launch manipulation risk
PumpFun origin typically involves burned mint authority (unconfirmed but probable)
Rapid holder growth (2 to 191 in 48h) shows some genuine market interest
Token is listed on PumpSwap providing at least some on-chain liquidity
No spam flag from data provider

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely inappropriate for conservative investors, those unfamiliar with micro-cap meme tokens, or anyone investing more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. The combination of extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, active distribution signals, and near-zero transparency places this in the highest risk category.

ALPACAS is a pure speculative meme token with no stated utility, no social presence, and no verified fundamentals. The investment case is entirely momentum-driven. The token pumped +1,057% in 24 hours from a dormant base, attracting retail attention, but is now showing clear distribution signals with 81% sell pressure. The risk/reward is highly asymmetric to the downside at current prices.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral meme momentum continues: the token gains social media traction, attracts influencer attention, and the 'Do Alpacas Really Wear Socks?' branding resonates as a meme. New buyers overwhelm sellers, liquidity deepens, and the token reaches a new ATH above $0.000081.

Viral social media moment or influencer promotion
Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all micro-caps
Community formation around the meme concept
Early holders completing distribution, reducing sell pressure

Base Case

Token stabilizes in the $0.000030–$0.000050 range for a few days as initial distribution pressure eases, then gradually fades as no new catalysts emerge. Holder count plateaus or slowly declines. Price drifts back toward $0.000020–$0.000030 over 1–2 weeks.

No major new catalysts (social media, listings) emerge
Sell pressure moderates as early holders finish distributing
A small core community of ~100–200 holders remains
Liquidity remains shallow, limiting both upside and downside velocity

Bear Case

High probability

Distribution completes rapidly: the original 2 pre-pump holders and early June 18 buyers finish selling into retail FOMO. Volume dries up, holders begin exiting, and price retraces to pre-pump levels near $0.000019–$0.000022 or lower. Token becomes dormant again.

81% sell pressure and 4:1 seller-to-buyer ratio already in progress
No social links or community infrastructure to sustain interest
Shallow liquidity accelerates price decline on sell pressure
30-day dormancy pattern suggests this may be a repeat pump-and-dump cycle
Decreasing volume after climax candle signals exhaustion

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 20, 10:47 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-20 22:47 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, mutability)
Price feed (USD spot price, 24h change)
OHLC hourly candles (17 candles, June 19–20, 2026)
Trading analytics (volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
Holder metrics (total holders, acquisition method, 24h/7d/30d changes)
Historical holder series (30 days daily)
PumpSwap pool data (liquidity, pair address)

Limitations

Top 20 holder data was unavailable — concentration risk cannot be precisely quantified
Sniper analysis data was unavailable — early buyer PnL and sell-through rate cannot be assessed
Mint authority and freeze authority status are unconfirmed
Update authority is listed as 'unknown' — cannot verify renouncement
Multiple OHLC candles show L > H (physically impossible), suggesting data feed anomalies — technical levels derived with caution
Supply concentration metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%) appear to be data gaps rather than true readings
Token is only ~2 days old — extremely limited price history for technical analysis
No social links or project description available to assess team or roadmap
24h price change of 0% shown in the 5m/24h fields conflicts with the +1,057% figure — possible data inconsistency

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Investing in micro-cap meme tokens carries extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Do Alpacas Really Wear Socks? (ALPACAS) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Do Alpacas Really Wear Socks? (ALPACAS)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Do Alpacas Really Wear Socks? ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 191 addresses (2026-06-20 22:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Do Alpacas Really Wear Socks??

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Do Alpacas Really Wear Socks? liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-20 22:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $47,700.07. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Do Alpacas Really Wear Socks? (ALPACAS)?

Is ALPACAS a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely inappropriate for conservative investors, those unfamiliar with micro-cap meme tokens, or anyone investing more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. The combination of extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, active distribution signals, and near-zero transparency places this in the highest risk category.

What are the key risks of holding ALPACAS?

30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump is a classic pre-coordinated launch pattern • 81% sell pressure with 320 sellers vs 80 buyers — active distribution in progress • No social links, no description, unverified contract — near-zero project transparency