SF

Spam Folder Price Today & AI Analysis

SFSolanaAnalysis as of Oct 15, 2026

Price

$0.052662

-93.80% 24h

Contract

Live
ABRTMgNqADDX1ZJWrCxXrVw6kUsgcAu62pUN8Tompump

Chain

Holders

799

Market cap

$2,583

At a $1M market cap, $SF would be $0.001031 (387x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Ask Unhosted AI about SF

3 free answers a day

More tokens on Solana

Spam Folder: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-10-15 05:15 UTC

Holder addresses

799

Top 10 supply share

4.28%

Reported liquidity

$2,400.00
How concentrated is Spam Folder ownership?
As of 2026-10-15 05:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 4.28% of supply. It reports 799 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Spam Folder?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-10-15 05:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,079,344.00 in buys and $1,064,320.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Spam Folder liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -92.72%, from $33,014.55 (2026-10-15 04:00 UTC) to $2,403.59 (2026-10-15 05:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-10-15 05:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-10-15 04:00 UTC$33,014.55
2026-10-15 05:00 UTC$2,403.59

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Report snapshot

as of Oct 15, 05:15 AM UTC

FDV

$2,583

Liquidity

$2,400.00

Holders

799

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Spam Folder (SF) is a pump.fun-origin token on PumpSwap that has collapsed ~93.8% in the last hour/24h (5m: -97.9%). FDV is about $2.58K with only $2.40K liquidity, despite $1.08M buy and $1.06M sell volume in 24h. Extremely fragile.

Key points

  • Price crashed from a $0.000242 hourly high to $0.00000266
  • Liquidity ($2.40K) roughly equals FDV ($2.58K)
  • Volume of ~$2.1M vastly exceeds liquidity
  • Top-10 hold only 4.28% across 799 holder addresses, but mint/freeze authority and sniper data are unavailable

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24h

bearish

After a ~98% 5-minute collapse, price is near the hourly low of 0.0000025. Further downside or illiquid chop is likely; any bounce would be thin and unreliable.

Target low

$0.0000010

Target high

$0.000008

Support

$0.0000025, $0.0000010

Resistance

$0.0000030, $0.000155, $0.000201

Medium term · 1-4 weeks

bearish

With liquidity of $2.4K and a crashed price, recovery is unlikely without a major catalyst; the token may go dormant.

Catalysts

  • New liquidity added
  • Renewed social promotion
  • Further sell-off draining the pool

Bullish factors

  • Buy pressure 50.4% in 24h
  • Top-10 share low at 4.28%
  • Mean-reversion bounce possible from extreme oversold levels

Bearish factors

  • -93.8% in 1h and 24h
  • -97.9% in 5m
  • Liquidity of only $2.40K
  • Failed spike to $0.000242
  • Authority status unknown

Confidence: low. Only two hourly candles are available, price action is extreme, and several data fields are missing.

SF call history

Full track record →

Oct 15bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
ABRTMg...pump
Total Supply
970,462,931.36

Key Risks

  • Extreme price collapse
  • Negligible liquidity
  • Authority status unverified
  • No sniper or wallet data

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Candle 1 (04:00) opened at 0.00000296, spiked to a high of 0.000241741 and closed at 0.000155903 (a roughly 52x pump). Candle 2 (05:00) opened at 0.000155903, reached a high of 0.000200943, dumped to a low of 0.0000025 and closed at 0.00000266, a ~98% loss with a long upper wick.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

A parabolic spike was followed by a full retracement, which is a classic pump-and-dump profile. Only two candles are available, so the medium-term view is limited.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000025

Major support

$0.0000010 (estimated; no historical data below)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000030

Major resistance

$0.000155–$0.000242

Levels come from only two candles. The high zone is far above the current price and unlikely to be revisited soon.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic spike then complete retrace
  • Long upper wicks on both candles
  • Full-body bearish candle in hour 2

Liquidity

Liquidity

$2,400.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity of $2.40K is tiny versus ~$2.1M of 24h volume. There were 8,190 buys and 7,245 sells. Even small trades will move price sharply and exits are difficult. Volume balance does not offset the crash.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

970,462,931.36

FDV

$2.58K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    -93.8% in 1h and -97.9% in 5m, with a 52x spike followed by a full retrace.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Only $2.40K liquidity, which is about equal to the FDV.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Top-10 share is 4.28% across 799 addresses, but top-100 data and wallet classifications are unavailable, so concentration cannot be fully assessed.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extreme price collapse
  • Negligible liquidity
  • Authority status unverified
  • No sniper or wallet data
  • Pump-and-dump profile

Mitigating factors

  • Top-10 share of 4.28% is low
  • Active trading with 2,174 buyers and 2,044 sellers in 24h

Suitable for

Suitable only for speculators who can afford a total loss. Not suitable for most investors.

A post-crash micro-cap with negligible liquidity. The risk/reward is poor and the data is limited.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A speculative bounce from oversold levels as new buyers return and liquidity grows.

  • Renewed promotion
  • Added liquidity
  • Mean reversion

Base Case

Price chops at very low levels with low volume and high slippage.

  • No new liquidity
  • Volume decays from current levels

Bear Case

High probability

Continued bleed toward zero as liquidity drains and volume fades.

  • Failed pump
  • Thin liquidity
  • Unverified authorities

Analysis details

Generated

Oct 15, 05:15 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-10-15 05:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata
  • Price data
  • 2 hourly OHLC candles
  • Trading analytics
  • Holder aggregates (Codex snapshot)

Limitations

  • No sniper data
  • No mint/freeze authority data
  • No holder history or wallet classification
  • Only 2 candles

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Informational analysis only, not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Spam Folder ownership?

As of 2026-10-15 05:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 4.28% of supply. It reports 799 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Spam Folder?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-10-15 05:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,079,344.00 in buys and $1,064,320.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Spam Folder liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -92.72%, from $33,014.55 (2026-10-15 04:00 UTC) to $2,403.59 (2026-10-15 05:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Spam Folder (SF)?

After a ~98% 5-minute collapse, price is near the hourly low of 0.0000025. Further downside or illiquid chop is likely; any bounce would be thin and unreliable. Short-term outlook is bearish (24h), with a target range of $0.0000010 to $0.000008.

Is SF a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 94/100. Suitable only for speculators who can afford a total loss. Not suitable for most investors.

What are the key risks of holding SF?

Extreme price collapse • Negligible liquidity • Authority status unverified

← Back to all predictions

Questions about SF?