febu's girlfriend Price Today & AI Analysis

Three hourly candles are available (17:00–19:00 UTC on 2026-07-15). Candle 3 (17:00): O=$0.0000315, H=$0.0000418, L=$0.0000243, C=$0.0000398 — a bullish candle with a lower wick showing buying support. Candle 2 (18:00): O=$0.0000387, H=$0.0000387, L=$0.0000305, C=$0.0000315 — a bearish candle, close near the low, indicating selling pressure dominated. Candle 1 (19:00): O=$0.0000315, H=$0.0000387, L=$0.0000387 [NOTE: L > H in raw data — likely a data anomaly; treating H=$0.0000387 as the range top], C=$0.0000387 — appears to close at the high, suggesting a brief recovery. Volume spiked dramatically in candle 2 (111,722 vs ~14,000 in candles 1 and 3), indicating the sell-off was the highest-volume event. The current price of $0.000141 is far above all three candle values, suggesting the most recent price action (post-candle 1) represents a continuation pump not yet captured in these candles.

Short-term trend is technically upward given the 474% 24h surge, but the medium-term picture (30 days of flatline at 48 holders) is sideways/dormant. The current uptrend is driven by a single explosive event rather than sustained accumulation, making it fragile.

Key Price Levels

The available OHLC data only covers a narrow range ($0.000024–$0.000042), well below the current price of $0.000141. This means the current price has no established technical support from prior candles — it is in uncharted territory for this token's recent history. A retracement toward the $0.000031–$0.000042 zone is technically plausible if selling continues.

The historical holder data reveals a striking pattern: exactly 48 holders for every single day from 2026-06-15 through 2026-07-14 — 30 consecutive days of zero change. Then, in a single 24-hour window, holders exploded from 48 to 739 (+691, +1,439%). This is not organic growth — it is a sudden activation event. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical to the 24h figure, confirming all growth occurred in one burst. Acquisition method shows 730 of 739 holders acquired via swap (vs 9 via transfer), consistent with retail traders buying into the pump. The 1h holder change of +218 (+29%) suggests the pump was still attracting new buyers at the time of data capture. This pattern is a hallmark of pump-and-dump schemes where early holders pump the price to attract retail, then distribute.

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token — no top 20 holders were returned, and supply concentration metrics show 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which is almost certainly a data gap rather than a genuine reflection of distribution. This opacity is itself a red flag. Without knowing who holds the supply, it is impossible to assess insider exit risk, whale concentration, or whether the original 48 holders (who held through 30 days of dormancy) are concentrated in a few wallets. The 'distribution: whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0' classification further confirms the data provider has no holder size breakdown available. Investors should treat this as high concentration risk by default given the unknown state.

Liquidity is critically shallow at $46.19K against an FDV of $141.25K — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of only ~32.7%. This means any meaningful sell order will cause severe slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: sell volume ($110.10K) is 1.91x buy volume ($57.52K), and unique sellers (908) outnumber unique buyers (557) by 63%. Total 24h volume of ~$167.6K is 3.6x the total liquidity pool, indicating extremely high turnover relative to depth. The pair is on PumpSwap (3fZeg1QzmXvCWGkPQXbKmGdxHcTxt5TyFyZUgSidJaXX). Market health is poor — the token is in active distribution with insufficient liquidity to support the current price if selling accelerates.

The token has a standard PumpFun supply of 1,000,000,000 (1 billion) tokens with 6 decimals. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is unverified. The token is marked as 'mutable: false' which is a mild positive signal (metadata cannot be changed), but mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data. The token was launched via PumpFun (mint address ends in 'pump') and has migrated to PumpSwap, which typically implies the bonding curve completed. PumpFun tokens that complete the bonding curve generally have liquidity locked, but this cannot be verified from the provided data. The absence of a description and unverified contract status are negative signals. Rug risk from authorities is classified as unknown due to insufficient data.

fibi (febu's girlfriend) is a PumpFun meme token exhibiting a textbook pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days of complete dormancy followed by a single-day 474% price explosion with dominant sell pressure (65.7%). The original 48 holders appear to be distributing into 691 new retail buyers attracted by FOMO. With only $46.19K in liquidity, no top holder data, and an unverified contract, the risk profile is extremely high. There is no fundamental value proposition — this is a pure speculative meme token.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed suggests very high risk of a pump-and-dump scheme. Never invest more than you can afford to lose. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. This analysis is based solely on the on-chain data provided and may not reflect all relevant information.