MEMEMAN

MEMEMAN Price Today & AI Analysis

MEMEMANSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 19, 2026

Price

$0.000191

+309.84% 24h · FDV $190,630

Contract

Live
9gaMApmv31oRKEqBmdyooYi5wpzAahi9h85VeHVFUW2Y

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,538

Market cap

$190,630

More tokens on Solana

BOMEBOMEBOOK OF MEME$0.000949-0.4%MC $65.37MXCryptoXCryptoXCrypto$0.044478-3.0%MC $42.7KFLEXFLEXReflex Monster$0.000501+960.6%MC $481.5KOPENAIOPENAIOpenAI PreStock$1,619.32+5.9%MC $3.08MLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONGLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONGLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG$0.000289+481.8%MC $288.9KZECZECZcash$1,568.94+8.3%MC $160.58M

MEMEMAN: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-19 21:15 UTC

Holder addresses

1,538

Top 10 supply share

30.77%

Reported liquidity

$20,790.00
How concentrated is MEMEMAN ownership?
As of 2026-09-19 21:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 30.77% of supply. It reports 1,538 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling MEMEMAN?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-19 21:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $582,027.00 in buys and $560,378.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is MEMEMAN liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -29.82%, from $33,425.22 (2026-09-19 20:00 UTC) to $23,459.20 (2026-09-19 21:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-19 21:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-19 20:00 UTC$33,425.22
2026-09-19 21:00 UTC$23,459.20

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about MEMEMAN

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 19, 09:16 PM UTC

FDV

$190,630

Liquidity

$20,790.00

Holders

1,538

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

MEMEMAN (MEMEMAN) is a newly-launched Solana meme token trading on a Raydium CPMM pool (pair CYXdxbm3...z1Mg) with a fully diluted valuation of ~$190.6K and extremely thin liquidity of only ~$20.79K. The token has shown extreme intraday volatility (24h change reported at +309.8%, but the two available hourly candles show a spike to $0.00053 followed by a crash back to ~$0.0000051 and partial recovery to ~$0.00019), indicative of a highly speculative, likely very early-stage or freshly launched pump-and-dump-prone asset. Holder base sits at 1,538 addresses with top-10 wallets controlling ~30.8% of supply. Critical data such as mint/freeze authority status, holder history, sniper wallet activity, and wallet classifications are unavailable, materially limiting confidence in this assessment.

Key points

  • Extremely low liquidity (~$20.79K) relative to a ~$190.63K FDV, implying high slippage and fragile price support
  • Massive intra-hour price swings (candle 1 ranged from O:$0.0000054 to H:$0.00053 to C:$0.000349; candle 2 fell to C:$0.000191) signaling erratic, possibly manipulated price action
  • Top-10 holders control ~30.8% of supply — a meaningful but not extreme concentration, though full distribution/whale behavior cannot be verified
  • No sniper data, no mint/freeze authority verification, and no holder history available, leaving major rug/authority risks fully unknown rather than mitigated

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Extreme volatility dominates recent price action: the token spiked to an hourly high of $0.00053 then collapsed to a low of $0.0000051 within the same hour, before closing near $0.000349, and the following hour closed lower again at $0.000191 (a 5m change of -14.9%). This pattern is characteristic of a pump followed by heavy profit-taking/dumping. With liquidity only ~$20.79K, any moderate sell order can move price sharply, and the immediate trend is downward from the recent peak.

Target low

$0.00009

Target high

$0.00035

Support

$0.0000051 (candle 1 intraday low), $0.0000995 (candle 2 intraday low)

Resistance

$0.000349 (candle 1 close), $0.000531 (candle 1 high, all-time high in dataset)

Medium term · 3-14 days

neutral

Without holder history, authority verification, or sustained volume trend data beyond 24h, medium-term direction cannot be reliably forecast. The token's survival depends heavily on whether liquidity is deepened and whether sell pressure (currently 49.1% of 24h volume) stabilizes or accelerates. Given the shallow liquidity pool and single 24h data point, this should be treated as highly speculative with no durable trend established.

Catalysts

  • Potential liquidity additions or removal (rug risk) given unresolved authority status
  • Continued retail/meme momentum via social channels (Twitter, website) could drive renewed buy pressure
  • Whale behavior from top-10 holders (30.8% of supply) — any coordinated selling could crash price further

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume ($582.03K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($560.38K), a marginal net positive pressure (50.9% vs 49.1%)
  • Unique 24h buyers (3,936) outnumber sellers (3,072), suggesting more distinct wallets are entering than exiting
  • Active social presence (Twitter, website) may sustain speculative interest

Bearish factors

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$20.79K) makes the token highly susceptible to slippage and price manipulation
  • Candle data shows a violent pump-and-dump pattern within a single hour (low $0.0000051 to high $0.00053)
  • 5m price change of -14.86% signals immediate downward momentum after the analyzed period
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or rug pull
  • No sniper or holder-history data to confirm organic distribution versus insider/early-buyer dumping

Confidence: low. Only two hourly candles are available, sniper and holder-history data are completely absent, and mint/freeze authority status is unverified. The 24h % change figure appears to reflect a single volatile pump-dump cycle rather than a stable trend, making any price projection highly uncertain.

MEMEMAN call history

Full track record →

Sep 19bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
9gaMAp...UW2Y
Total Supply
999,987,039.53 (formatted)

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$20.79K) relative to FDV (~$190.63K) and 24h volume (~$1.14M), creating high slippage and price-manipulation potential
  • Violent, wick-dominated price action within single hourly candles suggests possible pump-and-dump dynamics rather than organic price discovery
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the risk of supply inflation or wallet freezing
  • No sniper wallet data available to assess whether early buyers are positioned to dump on retail

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (20:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000054, spiked to a high of $0.000531, dropped to a low of $0.0000051, and closed at $0.000349 — a massive wick-dominated candle indicative of a sharp pump followed by partial dump, on volume of $940K. Candle 2 (21:00 UTC) opened at $0.000349 (prior close), rallied to $0.000449, then fell to a low of $0.0000995, closing at $0.000191 — again a large range with the close well below the high, on reduced volume of $336K. This is a classic volatile launch/pump pattern with long upper and lower wicks, not a clean trend.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price action shows two consecutive candles closing below their intra-candle highs, with the second candle closing lower than the first (~$0.000349 → ~$0.000191), suggesting fading momentum after an initial spike. With only two candles, a medium-term trend cannot be established; price should be considered range-bound/uncertain pending more data.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000995 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.0000051 (candle 1 low, effective floor observed)

Immediate resistance

$0.000349 (candle 1 close / candle 2 open)

Major resistance

$0.000531 (candle 1 high, session peak)

Price is currently trading (~$0.000191) between the candle-2 low ($0.0000995) and immediate resistance near the prior close ($0.000349). A break above $0.000349 would target the session high near $0.000531, while failure to hold $0.0000995 could see a retest of the extreme low near $0.0000051, though such a low likely reflects a liquidity-driven wick rather than a stable support level.

Notable patterns

  • Long-wick pump-and-dump candle (candle 1: low $0.0000051 to high $0.000531 within one hour)
  • Lower high / lower close sequence between candle 1 (close $0.000349) and candle 2 (close $0.000191), suggesting bearish follow-through
  • Declining volume between the two candles (~64% drop), a sign of waning momentum

Liquidity

Liquidity

$20,790.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of only ~$20.79K against a 24h trading volume exceeding $1.14M (buy + sell) implies the pool is turning over dozens of times its depth daily — a hallmark of shallow-liquidity, high-slippage trading conditions where even modest trades can cause outsized price impact, consistent with the extreme candle wicks observed. Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced ($582.03K vs $560.38K, 50.9%/49.1%), and unique buyers (3,936) modestly exceed unique sellers (3,072), suggesting broad but not overwhelmingly one-sided participation. This balance, combined with a shallow pool, explains the wild intra-hour price swings despite roughly even aggregate flow.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,987,039.53 (formatted)

FDV

$190.63K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Observed hourly candles show swings from a low of $0.0000051 to a high of $0.000531 within a single hour, and a 5-minute change of -14.86% at the most recent snapshot. This level of volatility is extreme even for meme tokens.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only ~$20.79K against 24h volume over $1.14M, meaning the pool cannot absorb moderate-sized trades without severe price impact; this shallow depth directly enables the observed extreme wicks.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holder addresses control ~30.8% of supply. This is a real but not disclosed as coming from insider or team wallets specifically — no wallet classification data exists, so the true nature of this concentration (team, exchange, community whales) is unknown, and this figure should be treated cautiously.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$20.79K) relative to FDV (~$190.63K) and 24h volume (~$1.14M), creating high slippage and price-manipulation potential
  • Violent, wick-dominated price action within single hourly candles suggests possible pump-and-dump dynamics rather than organic price discovery
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the risk of supply inflation or wallet freezing
  • No sniper wallet data available to assess whether early buyers are positioned to dump on retail
  • Top-10 holder concentration of ~30.8% combined with thin liquidity means a small number of wallets could materially move price
  • No historical holder data exists to confirm organic, sustained community growth versus a fleeting speculative spike

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($582.03K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($560.38K), and unique buyers (3,936) outnumber sellers (3,072), indicating some genuine two-sided demand
  • Token has an active social presence (Twitter, website), which may support continued community engagement
  • Holder base of 1,538 addresses suggests some degree of distribution beyond a handful of wallets, though this cannot be independently verified as healthy without history

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. Given shallow liquidity, unresolved authority risk, and extreme volatility, this token is unsuitable for risk-averse investors, retirement/long-horizon allocations, or any position sizing beyond small, disposable speculative capital.

MEMEMAN presents a classic high-risk, low-liquidity Solana meme token profile: a dramatic reported 24h price surge (+309.8%) driven by wick-heavy, low-liquidity candle action, near-balanced but very high buy/sell volume relative to a tiny $20.79K liquidity pool, and multiple critical data gaps (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history). Any thesis here is inherently speculative and should be sized accordingly.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If genuine community/social momentum (leveraging its Twitter and website presence) continues to attract new unique buyers (3,936 in 24h vs 3,072 sellers) faster than sellers exit, and if liquidity providers add meaningfully more depth to the Raydium CPMM pool, the token could stabilize above current support (~$0.0000995) and attempt to retest the session high near $0.000531.

  • Sustained or growing social media engagement driving fresh buyer inflow
  • Liquidity providers adding depth to reduce slippage and stabilize price
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market risk-on sentiment lifting speculative tokens generally

Base Case

Absent new catalysts, MEMEMAN likely continues to exhibit erratic, low-liquidity-driven price swings with no clear directional trend, trading opportunistically between the observed support (~$0.0000995–$0.0000051) and resistance (~$0.000349–$0.000531) zones while volume gradually normalizes or fades further.

  • No material liquidity injection or removal occurs in the near term
  • No confirmation is obtained on mint/freeze authority status, keeping rug risk an open unknown
  • Retail speculative interest neither meaningfully accelerates nor collapses in the immediate term

Bear Case

High probability

Given the extreme volatility already observed (a single-hour range from $0.0000051 to $0.000531), declining volume between candles (~64% drop), and a -14.86% 5-minute move at the most recent data point, the token could continue its downward slide, especially if any of the top-10 holders (30.8% of supply) or unverified insiders begin distributing into the thin $20.79K liquidity pool.

  • Shallow liquidity amplifying any sell pressure into sharp price declines
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status raising rug-pull or supply-inflation risk
  • Fading volume and momentum suggesting the initial pump has already peaked
  • Lack of sniper/holder-history data preventing confirmation of organic vs. manufactured demand

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 19, 09:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-19 21:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • Raydium CPMM pair pricing data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 most recent candles)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Codex holder aggregate snapshot (holder count, top-10 concentration)

Limitations

  • Only two hourly OHLC candles were available, preventing robust trend or pattern analysis
  • No sniper wallet data was provided, so sniper concentration, PnL, and dump risk are entirely unknown
  • No historical holder-count data exists, so holder growth trends and price correlation cannot be assessed
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and verified-contract status are all unresolved, leaving rug-pull risk unquantified
  • No wallet classification data exists, so whale/notable-holder behavior (accumulating vs. distributing) cannot be determined
  • 24h % change figures appear derived from a single volatile pump-dump cycle rather than a stable multi-day trend, reducing predictive reliability

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, much of which is incomplete or unverified. Cryptocurrency markets, and meme tokens in particular, are highly volatile and speculative; investors should conduct their own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past price action is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is MEMEMAN ownership?

As of 2026-09-19 21:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 30.77% of supply. It reports 1,538 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling MEMEMAN?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-19 21:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $582,027.00 in buys and $560,378.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is MEMEMAN liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -29.82%, from $33,425.22 (2026-09-19 20:00 UTC) to $23,459.20 (2026-09-19 21:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for MEMEMAN (MEMEMAN)?

Extreme volatility dominates recent price action: the token spiked to an hourly high of $0.00053 then collapsed to a low of $0.0000051 within the same hour, before closing near $0.000349, and the following hour closed lower again at $0.000191 (a 5m change of -14.9%). This pattern is characteristic of a pump followed by heavy profit-taking/dumping. With liquidity only ~$20.79K, any moderate sell order can move price sharply, and the immediate trend is downward from the recent peak. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.00009 to $0.00035.

Is MEMEMAN a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. Given shallow liquidity, unresolved authority risk, and extreme volatility, this token is unsuitable for risk-averse investors, retirement/long-horizon allocations, or any position sizing beyond small, disposable speculative capital.

What are the key risks of holding MEMEMAN?

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$20.79K) relative to FDV (~$190.63K) and 24h volume (~$1.14M), creating high slippage and price-manipulation potential • Violent, wick-dominated price action within single hourly candles suggests possible pump-and-dump dynamics rather than organic price discovery • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the risk of supply inflation or wallet freezing

← Back to all predictions

Track MEMEMAN