DUMP

DUMPSTR Price Today & AI Analysis

DUMP
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 10, 2026

9bmvoZZphKMmNxVbQ2q8AwvHRwENAYcYMTSK39jaCHDa

$0.000558

+4.75%

FDV $213,855

LiveContract:9bmvoZZphKMmNxVbQ2q8AwvHRwENAYcYMTSK39jaCHDaChain:SolanaHolders:6,036Market cap:$213,855

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about DUMP

Report snapshotas of Jul 10, 07:47 PM
FDV

$304,161

Liquidity

$179,348

Holders

661

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

DUMPSTR (DUMP) is an extremely new Solana SPL token (mint: 9bmvoZZphKMmNxVbQ2q8AwvHRwENAYcYMTSK39jaCHDa) that launched on or around July 10, 2026. The token experienced a catastrophic -81.99% price drop within its first 24 hours, collapsing from a launch price near $0.00247 to $0.000446. The holder base exploded from just 9 wallets (dormant for ~30 days) to 661 within a single day, suggesting a coordinated launch event. Top holder data is unavailable, supply concentration metrics report 0%, and no sniper data exists — all of which severely limit analytical confidence. The token is unverified, mutable authority is not renounced to a burn address, and the description claims utility ('On-Chain Strategy Engine for Solana SPL Arbitrage') that cannot be verified on-chain.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme 24h price collapse of -81.99%, from ~$0.00247 launch price to $0.000446
Holder base grew from 9 to 661 in a single day — dormant for ~30 days prior
Unusually high buy pressure (84.6% of volume) despite severe price decline — possible wash trading or bot activity
Update authority is NOT a burn address; contract is unverified and mutable metadata is false but authority not renounced
Top holder data and supply concentration data are entirely unavailable — major analytical blind spot
No sniper data available; early holder base of only 9 wallets for 30 days is a red flag for stealth accumulation

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token has already shed ~82% of its value in 24 hours. The most recent candles show continued downward pressure: candle [1] closed at $0.000446 vs open of $0.000484 (-7.9%), and candle [2] closed at $0.000485 vs open of $0.000615 (-21.1%). The 5m change is -1.21% and 1h is -6.87%, indicating ongoing selling. Immediate support is thin given shallow liquidity ($179K total). A retest of the $0.000357 low (candle [2] low) or even the $0.000127 low (candle [5]) is plausible.

Target low$0.000127
Target high$0.000524
Support: $0.000357 (candle [2] low), $0.000127 (candle [5] low), $0.000000223 (candle [6] absolute low)
Resistance: $0.000524 (candle [1] high), $0.000649 (candle [2] high), $0.000724 (candle [4] high)

Medium term

bearish
1–14 days

Without verified utility, renounced authorities, or transparent holder data, sustained recovery is unlikely. The token's narrative ('SPL Arbitrage Engine') is unverifiable. If early holders (the original 9 wallets) begin distributing, downward pressure could intensify significantly. Recovery would require new catalysts such as exchange listings, verified utility, or strong community momentum — none of which are evidenced in the current data.

Catalysts
  • Verified on-chain utility deployment
  • Renouncement of update authority to burn address
  • Organic holder growth beyond the initial 24h spike
  • Increased liquidity depth beyond current $179K

Bullish factors

  • High buy volume dominance (84.6% of 24h volume is buys, $372K vs $68K sells)
  • 762 unique buyers in 24h suggests broad initial interest
  • Total liquidity of $179K is non-trivial for a brand-new token
  • Mutable flag is false, suggesting metadata cannot be changed post-mint

Bearish factors

  • Price collapsed -81.99% in 24 hours from launch
  • Token was dormant with only 9 holders for ~30 days before sudden launch activity
  • Update authority (88nUixCD28HccguXGvwHiZaCmd37nwjWxbkMoTGJjVEQ) is not renounced
  • Contract is unverified
  • Top holder data unavailable — cannot assess whale sell risk
  • Candle [6] shows a near-zero wick low ($0.000000223) indicating extreme volatility at launch
  • 6h and 24h price change both show 0% — data inconsistency raises reliability concerns
  • FDV ($304K) is only marginally above total liquidity ($179K) — extremely thin market
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) missing top holder data preventing whale behavior analysis, (2) no sniper data, (3) only 6 hourly candles available for technical analysis, (4) the token is less than 24 hours old with highly anomalous metrics, and (5) the 6h and 24h price change fields both report 0% which is inconsistent with observed OHLC data — suggesting data pipeline issues.

DUMP call history

Full track record →
Jul 10bearish
24h+36.3%
7d+98.7%
30d-29.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Six hourly candles are available (14:00–19:00 UTC, July 10 2026). Candle [6] (14:00) is the launch candle: open $0.002463, high $0.002478, low $0.000000223, close $0.000129 — a massive bearish engulfing/crash candle with a near-zero wick, indicating a dump from launch price. Volume was enormous at $260,859. Candle [5] (15:00): open $0.000129 (near prior close), high $0.000713, low $0.000128, close $0.000364 — a bullish recovery attempt with high volume ($52,632). Candle [4] (16:00): open $0.000364, high $0.000724 (new local high), low $0.000348, close $0.000513 — bullish, higher high. Candle [3] (17:00): open $0.000509, high $0.000618, low $0.000373, close $0.000613 — bullish close near high. Candle [2] (18:00): open $0.000615, high $0.000649, low $0.000357, close $0.000485 — bearish reversal, shooting star-like, close well below open. Candle [1] (19:00): open $0.000484, high $0.000524, low $0.000417, close $0.000446 — continued bearish drift, lower close. Overall pattern: catastrophic launch dump followed by a 3-candle recovery rally (candles [5]–[3]), then a bearish reversal in candles [2]–[1]. Volume is declining sharply from $260K at launch to ~$10K in the most recent candle.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 85%Sell 15%

Short-term trend is down: after a brief 3-candle recovery from the launch crash low, price has resumed declining. The most recent two candles show lower closes and declining volume. Medium-term trend is also down given the -81.99% 24h performance and no established base.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000417 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.000128 (candle [5] low / post-launch floor)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000524 (candle [1] high)
Major$0.000724 (candle [4] high — local recovery peak)

The $0.000128 level represents the post-launch floor established in candle [5] and is the key major support. A break below this level would expose the token to the near-zero wick territory seen at launch. On the upside, $0.000524 is immediate resistance (candle [1] high), with $0.000649–$0.000724 as the recovery range resistance. The launch price zone ($0.00247) is extremely distant and unlikely to be revisited without major catalysts.

Notable patterns

  • Launch crash candle [6]: massive bearish engulfing with near-zero wick low ($0.000000223) — classic pump-and-dump launch signature
  • Candles [5]–[3]: three-candle recovery rally with higher highs (from $0.000128 to $0.000724)
  • Candle [2]: shooting star / bearish reversal — high of $0.000649 rejected, close near midpoint
  • Candles [2]–[1]: lower highs and lower closes — nascent downtrend resumption
  • Declining volume across recovery and decline — no sustained buying conviction
  • Candle [4] formed the highest local high ($0.000724) but failed to hold — false breakout

Total holders661
24h Δ+652
7d Δ+652
30d Δ+652
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is inversely correlated with price in this case: 652 new holders joined during a period of -81.99% price decline. This is atypical and suggests either: (1) buyers are 'buying the dip' aggressively, (2) the high buy volume ($372K, 84.6%) is driven by bots or wash trading rather than genuine new holders, or (3) the holder count metric is capturing wallet fragments from the launch event. The 527 swap-acquired vs 134 transfer-acquired breakdown suggests most new holders entered via DEX swaps.

The historical holder data is stark: exactly 9 holders for 30 consecutive days (June 10 – July 9, 2026) with zero net change on any day. Then on July 10, 2026, the holder count exploded to 661 — a +7,244% increase in a single day. This is a textbook stealth launch pattern. The 30-day dormancy with 9 holders indicates the token was pre-minted and held by insiders before any public activity. The sudden holder explosion coincides with the launch and subsequent price crash. Growth is technically 'accelerating' but this is entirely a launch artifact, not organic growth. The 30d, 7d, and 24h growth figures are all identical (652) because all growth occurred within the last 24 hours.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

Data unavailable

Top holder data not provided by data source

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token — no top 20 holders were returned by the data source, and supply concentration metrics report 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which is almost certainly a data artifact rather than a genuine reflection of distribution. Given the 30-day stealth period with only 9 holders, it is highly probable that supply is extremely concentrated among those original 9 wallets. The reported 0% concentration figures should be treated as unreliable. Distribution health is assessed as 'very_concentrated' based on the circumstantial evidence of the 9-wallet pre-launch period. Without actual holder data, whale sentiment cannot be determined with confidence — classified as 'mixed' to reflect uncertainty.

Liquidity$179,350
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$372,480
Sell$67,980
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers762
Unique sellers198

Total liquidity of $179,350 on a single Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pool (HoLxLKURkaag7bhUCBQk9LEAogp4m5ubnLtcbTo7vVxi) is shallow relative to the 24h trading volume of ~$440K. The FDV of $302,060 is only 1.68x the total liquidity, indicating the market cap is barely supported by the liquidity pool. Slippage risk is high — any significant sell order would move the price materially. The 84.6% buy pressure ($372K buys vs $68K sells) appears bullish on the surface, but must be viewed skeptically: (1) the price still fell -82%, which is inconsistent with genuine buy dominance; (2) the launch candle alone accounted for $260K of volume; (3) bot activity or wash trading cannot be ruled out. The net flow is technically inflow, but the price action tells a different story. With only one liquidity pool and no verified contract, liquidity removal risk is elevated.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply682,609,919.08 DUMP
FDV$304,160.72

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is 682,609,919 DUMP tokens. The FDV at current price is ~$304K. The update authority is 88nUixCD28HccguXGvwHiZaCmd37nwjWxbkMoTGJjVEQ — this is NOT a burn address (which would be 11111111111111111111111111111111 or similar), meaning the token metadata could potentially be updated. However, the 'Mutable: false' flag suggests the metadata itself is frozen. Mint authority and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the data — classified as 'unknown'. The contract is unverified, which means the token program cannot be independently audited. The combination of unverified contract, non-renounced update authority, and unknown mint/freeze authority status creates a medium authority risk. The FDV of ~$304K is extremely small, making this a micro-cap token with correspondingly high manipulation risk.

Volatility
high

Price dropped -81.99% in 24 hours from a launch price of ~$0.00247 to $0.000446. The launch candle had a near-zero wick low ($0.000000223), indicating extreme volatility. The token is less than 24 hours old with only 6 hourly candles of price history.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is $179K on a single AMM pool. FDV ($304K) is only 1.68x liquidity. Any significant sell pressure or liquidity removal would cause catastrophic price impact. Single pool dependency amplifies this risk.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is unavailable, but the 30-day stealth period with exactly 9 holders strongly implies extreme supply concentration among insiders. The reported 0% top-10 concentration is almost certainly a data artifact. True concentration is likely very high.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available, but the 9 pre-launch wallets that held the token dormant for 30 days represent a high dump risk. These wallets likely have a very low cost basis and could be significantly in profit even at current depressed prices, creating strong incentive to sell.

Authority
medium

Update authority (88nUixCD28HccguXGvwHiZaCmd37nwjWxbkMoTGJjVEQ) is not renounced to a burn address. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. Contract is unverified. 'Mutable: false' provides some protection against metadata changes but does not address mint/freeze risks.

Key risks

  • Catastrophic -81.99% price decline within 24 hours of launch
  • 30-day stealth accumulation by 9 wallets before public launch — classic insider dump setup
  • Top holder data entirely unavailable — cannot assess true concentration or whale sell risk
  • Single liquidity pool with only $179K depth — high slippage and removal risk
  • Unverified contract with non-renounced update authority
  • Unknown mint and freeze authority status
  • Inconsistent data: 6h and 24h price change both show 0% despite clear OHLC evidence of large moves
  • Near-zero wick ($0.000000223) in launch candle suggests possible price manipulation at launch
  • FDV of $304K is barely above liquidity — extremely thin market

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable flag is false — metadata cannot be arbitrarily changed
  • 762 unique buyers in 24h suggests some genuine market interest
  • Total liquidity of $179K is non-trivial for a brand-new micro-cap
  • Social links (Twitter, website) exist — some public presence
  • Buy volume dominance (84.6%) could indicate genuine accumulation at depressed prices
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap Solana tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana DeFi mechanics and rug pull patterns. The combination of stealth launch, missing holder data, unverified contract, and catastrophic price action places this in the highest risk category.

DUMPSTR (DUMP) presents an extremely high-risk profile with multiple red flags consistent with a coordinated launch-and-dump scheme. The token was dormant for 30 days with 9 holders, launched with a catastrophic price crash of -82%, and lacks verifiable on-chain utility, renounced authorities, or transparent holder data. While the high buy volume and new holder influx could theoretically support a recovery, the structural risks overwhelmingly dominate. This is a speculative micro-cap token where the probability of further significant losses is high.

Bull case (low)

The token finds a floor near the $0.000128–$0.000357 support zone, the original 9 holders do not dump, genuine community forms around the 'SPL Arbitrage' narrative, and buy pressure (84.6% of volume) translates into sustained price recovery toward the $0.000649–$0.000724 resistance zone.

  • Sustained buy pressure from 762 unique buyers continues
  • Original 9 insider wallets hold rather than distribute
  • Verified utility or product launch generates organic demand
  • Liquidity deepens beyond current $179K
  • Authority renouncement builds community trust

Base case

Price stabilizes in the $0.000200–$0.000450 range with declining volume and holder growth slowing. The token neither recovers significantly nor collapses completely in the near term, but gradually loses relevance as trading activity fades. Long-term value approaches zero without verified utility.

  • Insider wallets partially distribute but do not fully dump
  • Liquidity remains in the pool but does not grow significantly
  • Holder count stabilizes around 600–800 with minimal new inflows
  • No verified product or utility is delivered
  • Token fades into low-activity status within 7–14 days

Bear case (high)

The original 9 pre-launch wallets begin distributing their holdings into the current buy pressure, liquidity is removed from the single AMM pool, and the price collapses toward or below the $0.000128 post-launch floor. A complete rug pull to near-zero is possible.

  • Insider wallets (9 pre-launch holders) dump into buy pressure
  • Liquidity removal from the single Meteora pool
  • Failure to establish verifiable utility
  • Declining volume trend continues (from $260K to $10K in 5 candles)
  • Broader market risk-off sentiment affecting micro-caps

GeneratedJul 10, 07:47 PM
Data freshnessPrice and OHLC data current as of 2026-07-10T19:00:00.000Z (most recent hourly candle). Holder data current as of analysis time. Historical holder series covers June 10 – July 9, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis Solana Token Metadata API (mint: 9bmvoZZphKMmNxVbQ2q8AwvHRwENAYcYMTSK39jaCHDa)
  • Moralis Price API (USD price, 24h change)
  • Moralis OHLC Candles API (6 hourly candles, July 10 2026)
  • Moralis Trading Analytics API (volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Moralis Holder Metrics API (total holders, acquisition method, distribution)
  • Moralis Historical Holders API (30-day daily series)
  • Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pool data (HoLxLKURkaag7bhUCBQk9LEAogp4m5ubnLtcbTo7vVxi)

Limitations

  • Top 20 holder data is entirely unavailable — cannot assess true supply concentration or whale behavior
  • Sniper analysis data is unavailable — early buyer PnL and sell-through rate cannot be determined
  • Only 6 hourly candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • 6h and 24h price change fields both report 0% despite clear OHLC evidence of large moves — possible data pipeline issue
  • Supply concentration metrics report 0% for top 10 and top 100 — likely a data artifact, not genuine distribution
  • Mint authority and freeze authority status not explicitly provided
  • Token is less than 24 hours old — all metrics are subject to extreme volatility and may not be representative
  • The token description claims 'SPL Arbitrage Engine' utility which cannot be verified from on-chain data alone
  • Update authority identity (88nUixCD28HccguXGvwHiZaCmd37nwjWxbkMoTGJjVEQ) not further identified

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly micro-cap tokens on Solana, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in DUMP. All data is sourced from third-party APIs and may contain errors or gaps. Past price action is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decision.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply682,609,919.08 DUMP

Key Risks

Catastrophic -81.99% price decline within 24 hours of launch
30-day stealth accumulation by 9 wallets before public launch — classic insider dump setup
Top holder data entirely unavailable — cannot assess true concentration or whale sell risk
Single liquidity pool with only $179K depth — high slippage and removal risk

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for DUMP. However, the historical holder data reveals a highly suspicious pattern: the token had exactly 9 holders for the entire 30-day period from June 10 to July 9, 2026, with zero net change. This strongly suggests a small group of insiders held the entire supply in stealth for ~30 days before the public launch on July 10. These 9 early wallets are the effective 'smart money' and their behavior is the primary risk factor. Their current PnL state and sell-through rate cannot be determined from available data.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available for this token.

The 9 pre-launch holders represent the highest-risk group. Having held for ~30 days at near-zero activity, they likely accumulated at very low cost basis. The launch price of ~$0.00247 and subsequent crash to $0.000446 means any holder who bought at or near launch is deeply underwater (-82%). The original 9 wallets, however, likely have a much lower cost basis and may still be in profit even at current prices. Their sentiment is unknown but the stealth accumulation pattern is a classic precursor to a coordinated dump.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for DUMPSTR (DUMP)?

The token has already shed ~82% of its value in 24 hours. The most recent candles show continued downward pressure: candle [1] closed at $0.000446 vs open of $0.000484 (-7.9%), and candle [2] closed at $0.000485 vs open of $0.000615 (-21.1%). The 5m change is -1.21% and 1h is -6.87%, indicating ongoing selling. Immediate support is thin given shallow liquidity ($179K total). A retest of the $0.000357 low (candle [2] low) or even the $0.000127 low (candle [5]) is plausible. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000127 to $0.000524.

Is DUMP a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap Solana tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana DeFi mechanics and rug pull patterns. The combination of stealth launch, missing holder data, unverified contract, and catastrophic price action places this in the highest risk category.

How are DUMP holders trending?

DUMPSTR currently has 661 holders and is growing (24h: 652, 7d: 652, 30d: 652). The historical holder data is stark: exactly 9 holders for 30 consecutive days (June 10 – July 9, 2026) with zero net change on any day. Then on July 10, 2026, the holder count exploded to 661 — a +7,244% increase in a single day. This is a textbook stealth launch pattern. The 30-day dormancy with 9 holders indicates the token was pre-minted and held by insiders before any public activity. The sudden holder explosion coincides with the launch and subsequent price crash. Growth is technically 'accelerating' but this is entirely a launch artifact, not organic growth. The 30d, 7d, and 24h growth figures are all identical (652) because all growth occurred within the last 24 hours.

What does sniper activity look like for DUMP?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding DUMP?

Catastrophic -81.99% price decline within 24 hours of launch • 30-day stealth accumulation by 9 wallets before public launch — classic insider dump setup • Top holder data entirely unavailable — cannot assess true concentration or whale sell risk

Track DUMP