APEZCAT

apeonzcat Price Today & AI Analysis

APEZCATSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 22, 2026

Price

$0.056465

-86.87% 24h · FDV $6,265

Contract

Live
8scSC6m9Y2YDH5hRxvmVPLHUctzyRceh6oYV27pRpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,328

Market cap

$6,265

More tokens on Solana

ZCATZCATAnonymous Cat$0.0961-20.0%MC $93.07MMUMUMicron Technology - Backpack Securities$1,049.9+3.0%MC $5.42MStampStampZcash Shielded Assets$0.000621-94.7%MC $614.9KUSELESSUSELESSUSELESS COIN$0.2768+7.1%MC $276.50MTROLLTROLLTROLL$0.0552+3.1%MC $55.14MANTFUNANTFUNAntFun$0.009311-88.3%MC $82.61M

apeonzcat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-22 20:15 UTC

Holder addresses

1,328

Top 10 supply share

26.36%

Reported liquidity

$4,075.00
How concentrated is apeonzcat ownership?
As of 2026-09-22 20:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 26.36% of supply. It reports 1,328 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling apeonzcat?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-22 20:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,471,296.00 in buys and $1,456,086.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is apeonzcat liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -89.62%, from $39,261.42 (2026-09-22 19:00 UTC) to $4,074.68 (2026-09-22 20:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-22 20:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-22 19:00 UTC$39,261.42
2026-09-22 20:00 UTC$4,074.68

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about APEZCAT

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 22, 08:16 PM UTC

FDV

$6,265

Liquidity

$4,075.00

Holders

1,328

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

APEZCAT (apeonzcat) is a newly-launched Solana memecoin trading on PumpSwap with a tiny FDV of ~$6.26K and total liquidity of just $4.08K. Available OHLC data captures a violent pump-and-dump: price spiked over 100x intra-hour to a high of ~$0.000828 before collapsing ~87% in 24 hours to ~$0.0000065. Critical risk inputs — mint/freeze authority status, sniper wallet data, and holder history/classification — are all unavailable, meaning this analysis is built on a partial data set and carries significant uncertainty.

Key points

  • Extreme, confirmed pump-and-dump price pattern within a two-hour window (100x+ spike, then ~87-94% collapse)
  • Razor-thin liquidity ($4.08K) relative to reported 24h trading volume (~$2.93M combined) and FDV (~$6.26K)
  • Top-10 holders control 26.36% of supply per current snapshot, but no historical or classification data exists to assess whether this is healthy or concerning
  • Mint/freeze authority, verified contract, and sniper data are all unknown/unavailable, leaving major fundamental risk questions unanswered

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48 hours

bearish

Following an ~87% 24h decline and a -94% 1h collapse from intra-day highs, the token is likely to remain volatile and range near current depressed levels (~$0.0000065) unless a fresh liquidity or demand catalyst emerges. The +29.5% 5m uptick could represent a minor dead-cat bounce rather than a sustained recovery.

Target low

$0.0000031

Target high

$0.0000090

Support

$0.0000031 (candle 2 low), $0.0000065 (current price)

Resistance

$0.0000070 (candle 1 opening level), $0.000614 (candle 1 close, distant resistance)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

bearish

Absent verified fundamentals (unknown mint/freeze authority, no holder history, no sniper visibility) and with liquidity as thin as $4.08K, the medium-term outlook leans bearish to neutral at best, with high risk of further decay in price and liquidity typical of failed pump-and-dump memecoins.

Catalysts

  • Any confirmation (positive or negative) of mint/freeze authority status could swing sentiment sharply
  • Liquidity additions or removals by the deployer/LPs
  • Renewed social media attention around the 'apeonzcat' meme crossover concept
  • Continued thin liquidity making the token vulnerable to further sharp drawdowns or manipulation

Bullish factors

  • Balanced 24h buy/sell volume (50.3%/49.7%) shows some two-sided market participation
  • 1,456 unique buyers in 24h indicates non-trivial retail interest
  • Small +29.5% 5m bounce suggests some near-term dip-buying

Bearish factors

  • -86.87% 24h and -94.16% 1h price declines signal severe loss of momentum
  • Extremely thin $4.08K liquidity heightens manipulation and further crash risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status is an unresolved red flag
  • No sniper/holder history data to confirm healthy distribution or rule out insider dumping
  • Classic pump-and-dump candle pattern observed in the only two candles available

Confidence: low. Only two hourly OHLC candles and no historical holder or sniper data were provided, severely limiting the ability to construct a reliable technical or fundamental forecast. The extreme volatility already observed (100x+ intra-candle swings) further undermines forecast reliability for a token this new and thinly traded.

APEZCAT call history

Full track record →

Sep 22bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
8scSC6...pump
Total Supply
969,091,701.02 APEZCAT

Key Risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($4.08K) relative to trading volume and FDV, making the token highly susceptible to slippage and price manipulation
  • Confirmed pump-and-dump style price action with a ~-87% 24h decline and a -94% 1h collapse from an intra-day high
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer
  • No sniper or wallet classification data available, obscuring visibility into bot activity or coordinated dumping

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles were provided. Candle 1 (19:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000696, spiked to a high of $0.000637, and closed near the high at $0.000614 on volume of ~2.51M — a massive, likely bot/launch-driven vertical move (roughly 88x from open to close intra-candle). Candle 2 (20:00 UTC) opened at $0.000614, spiked further to an all-time high of $0.000828, then collapsed to a low of $0.00000313 before closing at $0.00000646 on volume of ~459K — a near-total round-trip retracement erasing almost the entire prior gain within a single hour.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Price action shows an extreme pump-and-dump pattern: a rapid multi-hundred-percent spike followed by an even sharper crash back to near the original starting price within roughly two hours. The 24h change of -86.87% and 1h change of -94.16% confirm the token is currently in a violent downtrend after topping out.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000031 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.0000031 (candle 2 low, near pre-pump levels)

Immediate resistance

$0.000614 (candle 1 close / candle 2 open)

Major resistance

$0.000828 (candle 2 all-time high)

With only two candles of data, support/resistance levels are provisional. The current price (~$0.00000646) sits just above the candle 2 low of ~$0.0000031, essentially back near where the move began (~$0.00000696 open of candle 1). The prior highs ($0.000614–$0.000828) now represent extremely distant resistance levels that would require a 100x+ move to retest, and likely reflect an illiquid spike rather than sustainable price discovery.

Notable patterns

  • Vertical pump candle followed by a near-full round-trip reversal (classic pump-and-dump / rug-style wick)
  • Extreme high-low range within single hourly candles (over 100x intra-candle range in candle 1 and ~266x in candle 2), consistent with thin liquidity and possible bot/sniper-driven price discovery
  • Current price closing near the level where the move originated, effectively erasing the entire rally

Liquidity

Liquidity

$4,075.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of only $4.08K against a 24h traded volume of roughly $2.93M combined (buy+sell) is an extreme mismatch — implying liquidity has been recycled hundreds of times over the day and/or that reported volume includes significant wash or bot-driven activity relative to the tiny pool. Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.3% buy vs 49.7% sell), and buyer/seller counts are similarly balanced (1,456 buyers vs 1,313 sellers), suggesting no strong net directional flow despite the massive price collapse. With only ~$4K of liquidity backing a token that has FDV of ~$6.26K, slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade is high, and the pool is vulnerable to being drained or manipulated by a single mid-size trade.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

969,091,701.02 APEZCAT

FDV

$6,265

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price moved from a low of ~$0.0000031 to a high of ~$0.000828 and back down to ~$0.0000065 within two hourly candles; 24h change is -86.87% and 1h change is -94.16%. This is extreme, near-unprecedented volatility even by memecoin standards.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $4.08K against an FDV of $6.26K and reported 24h volumes near $2.93M combined, indicating a very thin, easily manipulated pool with high slippage for any non-trivial trade size.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control 26.36% of supply per the current snapshot. Top-100 concentration and wallet classifications (team/insider/exchange) are unavailable, so the full concentration picture and whether these are genuine dispersed holders or coordinated wallets cannot be assessed.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($4.08K) relative to trading volume and FDV, making the token highly susceptible to slippage and price manipulation
  • Confirmed pump-and-dump style price action with a ~-87% 24h decline and a -94% 1h collapse from an intra-day high
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer
  • No sniper or wallet classification data available, obscuring visibility into bot activity or coordinated dumping
  • Top-10 holders control over a quarter (26.36%) of supply with no visibility into their identity or intent
  • Very low FDV (~$6.26K) typical of extremely early-stage, speculative, low-credibility launches

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.3% vs 49.7%), suggesting the crash was not driven by one-sided panic dumping alone but by broad two-sided trading activity
  • A large number of unique buyers (1,456) and sellers (1,313) participated in the last 24h, indicating some organic trading interest rather than a single actor controlling all flow
  • Project has basic social presence (Twitter, website) listed in metadata

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand memecoin dynamics and can tolerate total loss of capital. It is unsuitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to independently verify contract authorities before trading.

APEZCAT is a micro-cap memecoin (FDV ~$6.26K) that just experienced an extreme pump-and-dump cycle, spiking over 100x intra-hour before collapsing ~87% in 24 hours. Data gaps around mint/freeze authorities, sniper wallets, and historical holder trends make this a high-uncertainty, high-risk speculative asset that should not be evaluated as a stable investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the token stabilizes post-crash and attracts renewed organic buying interest (evidenced by balanced 24h buy/sell volume and over 1,400 unique buyers), it could see a short-term relief bounce, especially given the +29.5% 5m move suggesting some dip-buying activity.

  • Balanced 24h buy (50.3%) and sell (49.7%) volume suggests residual two-sided interest rather than pure capitulation
  • Meme crossover concept ('apeonzcat') may attract speculative attention if socials gain traction
  • Large number of unique daily buyers (1,456) shows some breadth of participation

Base Case

Given the data gaps and the severity of the observed crash, the most likely near-term outcome is continued high volatility and price discovery at a much lower level than the spike highs, with the token trading as a highly speculative, thinly-traded micro-cap.

  • No new material catalysts (e.g., authority renouncement confirmation, liquidity injection) emerge in the near term
  • Trading volume continues to be dominated by short-term speculators rather than long-term holders
  • Liquidity remains thin, keeping the token prone to sharp swings in either direction

Bear Case

High probability

The extreme pump-and-dump pattern, paired with razor-thin $4.08K liquidity and unknown mint/freeze authority status, points to a high probability of further collapse, rug risk, or the token fading into illiquidity/irrelevance.

  • -86.87% 24h decline and -94.16% 1h decline indicate a severe, likely unrecoverable flush
  • Total liquidity of only $4.08K makes the token trivial to manipulate or drain further
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and unverified contract status leave open the possibility of malicious deployer action
  • No sniper or holder-history data to rule out bot-driven or insider-coordinated dumping

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 22, 08:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-22 20:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (name, symbol, supply, description, social links)
  • USD price and 24h/1h/5m percentage change data
  • Two hourly OHLC candles (most recent available)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, liquidity, FDV)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count and top-10 concentration only)

Limitations

  • Only two hourly OHLC candles were available, insufficient for robust technical analysis or reliable support/resistance identification
  • No sniper wallet data was available, preventing assessment of sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No historical holder data was available, preventing assessment of holder growth trends, accumulation/distribution, or whale classification
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and spam-flag status were all unknown, leaving a major rug-risk gap unaddressed
  • Reported 24h volume ($2.93M combined) vastly exceeds total liquidity ($4.08K), suggesting possible data anomalies, wash trading, or extremely high pool turnover that could not be independently verified

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (authority status, sniper activity, holder history). Token descriptions and metadata originate from the token creator and may be misleading or promotional. Extreme volatility and thin liquidity observed in this token indicate very high risk of substantial or total loss. Independent due diligence and verification of contract authorities is strongly recommended before any transaction.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is apeonzcat ownership?

As of 2026-09-22 20:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 26.36% of supply. It reports 1,328 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling apeonzcat?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-22 20:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,471,296.00 in buys and $1,456,086.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is apeonzcat liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -89.62%, from $39,261.42 (2026-09-22 19:00 UTC) to $4,074.68 (2026-09-22 20:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for apeonzcat (APEZCAT)?

Following an ~87% 24h decline and a -94% 1h collapse from intra-day highs, the token is likely to remain volatile and range near current depressed levels (~$0.0000065) unless a fresh liquidity or demand catalyst emerges. The +29.5% 5m uptick could represent a minor dead-cat bounce rather than a sustained recovery. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.0000031 to $0.0000090.

Is APEZCAT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 92/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand memecoin dynamics and can tolerate total loss of capital. It is unsuitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to independently verify contract authorities before trading.

What are the key risks of holding APEZCAT?

Extremely thin liquidity ($4.08K) relative to trading volume and FDV, making the token highly susceptible to slippage and price manipulation • Confirmed pump-and-dump style price action with a ~-87% 24h decline and a -94% 1h collapse from an intra-day high • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer

← Back to all predictions

Track APEZCAT