GMEBAY Price Today & AI Analysis

Q: Can I sell GMEBAY?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

Q: Is GMEBAY a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token dynamics and are prepared to lose 100% of invested capital. Absolutely not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. Position sizing should be minimal (e.g., <0.1% of portfolio) if engaging at all.

GMEBAYSolanaAnalysis as of May 1, 2026

$0.0₅4327

Contract

Live

8n58q3pUr7VK3jhCXfx75rPLiygRWLuSSiyxP7aapump

Chain

Solana

Holders

203

Market cap

$4,326

At a $1M market cap, $GMEBAY would be $0.001000 (231x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is GMEBAY a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 28

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

2.5%1 sniper, 1 bundler still holding

Creator holds

2.5%

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about GMEBAY

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

WINDOWS7PCThe Windows 7 PC System$0.0₅2508+0.0%MC $2.5K

MSTRMicroStrategy$0.0₆8501+0.0%MC $69.5K

AliunAliun$0.0₅2246+0.0%MC $2.2K

Jimothy911Jimothy 9.11$0.0₅4801+0.0%MC $4.7K

MBITMBIT$0.0₅2450-3.5%MC $2.4K

DUBBLEDubble$0.001277+2674.5%MC $1.26M

GMEBAY: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-01 23:19 UTC

Holder addresses

776

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$24,052.99

How concentrated is GMEBAY ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 776 addresses (2026-05-01 23:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling GMEBAY?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is GMEBAY liquidity falling?: As of 2026-05-01 23:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $24,052.99. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-01 23:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 1, 11:19 PM UTC

FDV

$71,680

Liquidity

$24,052.99

Holders

776

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

GMEBAY (8n58q3pUr7VK3jhCXfx75rPLiygRWLuSSiyxP7aapump) is a Solana meme token themed around a fictional acquisition of eBay by GameStop Corp. Launched on PumpSwap, it carries a fully diluted valuation of ~$71.7K (on-chain analytics show $135.25K FDV) with ~$24K in total liquidity. The token experienced a sharp spike in the last 24 hours — holders surged from 61 to 776 (+92%) — but sell pressure is overwhelming at 82.3% of volume. The token is unverified, has unknown update authority, and exhibits classic pump-and-dump risk patterns.

Key points

Meme narrative tied to a fictional GME/EBAY corporate acquisition
Explosive 24h holder growth (+715 holders, +92%) concentrated almost entirely in the last hour (+481)
Severe sell-side dominance: 82.3% sell pressure ($336.87K sell vs $72.66K buy volume)
Very low liquidity ($24.05K) relative to trading volume, creating extreme slippage risk
20 snipers identified in first 1000 blocks, majority in profit — elevated dump risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token spiked from ~$0.0000323 to a high of ~$0.000256 within the last two hourly candles before closing at $0.0000717 — a sharp rejection from the high. With 82.3% sell pressure, 5,777 sells vs 1,462 buys, and only $24K liquidity, further downside is the most probable near-term outcome. The 5m and 1h changes are marginally positive (+2.4% and +0.7%), suggesting a brief consolidation, but the structural sell imbalance is dominant.

Target low

$0.0000323

Target high

$0.000120

Support: $0.0000494 (candle [1] low), $0.0000323 (candle [2] open / prior base)
Resistance: $0.000120 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close), $0.000159 (candle [1] high), $0.000256 (candle [2] all-time high)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Without a sustained narrative catalyst or significant new liquidity inflows, the token is likely to bleed back toward its pre-pump base. The meme concept (GME acquiring EBAY) has no fundamental backing. Holder growth was almost entirely concentrated in a single hour, suggesting coordinated activity rather than organic adoption. Sniper profits are largely unrealized or partially taken — continued distribution is expected.

Catalysts

Viral social media pickup of the GME/EBAY narrative
Broader Solana meme season momentum
New liquidity pool additions or CEX listing (highly unlikely at this FDV)
Sniper and whale sell-off completing, allowing price stabilization

Bullish factors

20.2% 24h price gain despite heavy sell pressure
Holder count surged +92% in 24h, indicating viral attention
Meme narrative (GME/EBAY) has proven retail appeal in past cycles
Some snipers still holding (e.g., sniper #15 holds $107, sniper #19 holds $97), suggesting not all early buyers have exited

Bearish factors

82.3% sell pressure — 5,777 sells vs 1,462 buys in 24h
Only $24.05K total liquidity — any moderate sell order causes severe slippage
Price closed well below the session high ($0.000256 high → $0.0000717 close = -72% from peak)
Holder growth almost entirely in last 1 hour (+481 of +715 total 24h gain) — likely bot/coordinated activity
Unverified contract, unknown update authority, mutable=false but authority unknown
FDV of only ~$71.7K with no real utility or roadmap

Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, providing extremely limited price history. The 30-day holder data shows the token was dormant at 61 holders until a sudden spike. Sniper USD amounts are unknown, making precise supply-side pressure calculations impossible. Confidence is low due to data sparsity and extreme volatility.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 8n58q3...pump
Total Supply: 999,996,657.06

Key Risks

Extreme sell pressure (82.3% of volume) with shallow $24K liquidity — price collapse risk is immediate
Sniper distribution ongoing — early buyers with 100–370%+ profits continue to sell into retail demand
Holder surge (+481 in 1 hour) may reflect bot activity or coordinated pump, not organic adoption
Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for supply manipulation cannot be ruled out

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (22:00 UTC): O=$0.0000332, H=$0.000256, L=$0.0000323, C=$0.000120 — a massive bullish spike with a long upper wick, closing near the midpoint of the range. Volume was extremely high at $338.7K. Candle [1] (23:00 UTC): O=$0.000118, H=$0.000160, L=$0.0000490, C=$0.0000717 — opened near candle [2]'s close, failed to sustain momentum, closed near the low with a long upper wick. Volume dropped sharply to $54.5K. The two-candle pattern shows a classic pump-and-dump: explosive spike followed by immediate rejection and close near session lows. The bearish engulfing / shooting star structure on candle [1] is a strong reversal signal.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is clearly bearish — price peaked at $0.000256 and has since rejected to $0.0000717, a -72% drawdown from the spike high within 2 hours. Medium-term is sideways/unknown given the token was dormant for 30 days prior to this event.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

18%

Sell

82%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000494 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.0000323 (candle [2] low / pre-pump base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000120 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close)

Major resistance

$0.000256 (candle [2] all-time high spike)

The $0.0000494 level is the most recent swing low and first line of defense. A break below it opens the door to the pre-pump base at $0.0000323. On the upside, $0.000120 is the first meaningful resistance (prior close), with $0.000159 and $0.000256 as progressively stronger resistance levels from the spike wicks.

Notable patterns

Shooting star / bearish engulfing on candle [1] — strong reversal signal after spike
Pump-and-dump two-candle structure: explosive spike followed by immediate rejection
Volume climax on candle [2] with 84% volume drop on candle [1] — classic distribution signature
Long upper wicks on both candles indicate strong selling pressure at higher prices
Price closed in the lower quartile of candle [1]'s range — bearish close

Liquidity

$24,052.99

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $24.05K on a single PumpSwap pool (7Czaej8qJ2mJepfuTV7nVFnhanYyBoYEYQZYL45uVqKY). The 24h trading volume of ~$409.5K is approximately 17x the total liquidity — an extreme ratio that guarantees severe slippage on any meaningful order. The sell-to-buy ratio is stark: 5,777 sells vs 1,462 buys, with 1,871 unique sellers vs 520 unique buyers. Net flow is heavily outbound. The FDV of $135.25K (per analytics) vs $24.05K liquidity means the token is extremely illiquid relative to its implied market cap. Any whale exit from the top non-LP holders (3.88% = ~38.8M tokens) would likely move price 30–50%+ given current depth. Market health is poor.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,996,657.06

FDV

$71,679.61

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved from $0.0000323 to $0.000256 (+692%) and back to $0.0000717 (-72% from high) within 2 hours. Extreme intraday volatility with only 2 candles of history available.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $24.05K against $409K+ in 24h volume. The liquidity-to-volume ratio of ~1:17 guarantees severe slippage. A single whale exit could drain the pool.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme sell pressure (82.3% of volume) with shallow $24K liquidity — price collapse risk is immediate
Sniper distribution ongoing — early buyers with 100–370%+ profits continue to sell into retail demand
Holder surge (+481 in 1 hour) may reflect bot activity or coordinated pump, not organic adoption
Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for supply manipulation cannot be ruled out
No verified contract, no utility, no roadmap — pure speculative meme with fictional narrative
Token was dormant for 30+ days before spike — suggests coordinated launch timing

Mitigating factors

Mutable=false metadata reduces risk of rug via metadata manipulation
LP pool holds 13.97% of supply, providing some baseline liquidity
Not flagged as spam by Moralis
Some snipers still holding suggests not all early buyers have exited simultaneously
Meme narrative (GME/EBAY) has demonstrated retail appeal in past market cycles

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token dynamics and are prepared to lose 100% of invested capital. Absolutely not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. Position sizing should be minimal (e.g., <0.1% of portfolio) if engaging at all.

GMEBAY is a high-risk, low-FDV meme token that experienced a coordinated pump event on May 1, 2026. The token has no utility, no verified contract, and no fundamental value proposition beyond its meme narrative. The risk/reward profile is extremely unfavorable at current prices given the overwhelming sell pressure, shallow liquidity, and active sniper distribution. The only viable thesis is a short-term speculative trade on meme momentum, which carries very high probability of loss.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral meme momentum drives sustained retail FOMO, pushing price back toward the $0.000159–$0.000256 spike range. New liquidity enters the pool, reducing slippage risk. The GME/EBAY narrative gains traction on social media (Twitter/X, Reddit), attracting a new wave of buyers that absorbs sniper and whale selling pressure.

Viral social media spread of GME/EBAY acquisition meme
Broader Solana meme season with elevated retail participation
New market makers or liquidity providers entering the pool
Sniper selling completing, removing overhead supply pressure

Base Case

Price consolidates in the $0.0000494–$0.000120 range over the next 24–72 hours as initial pump excitement fades. Volume declines significantly. Holder count stabilizes around 700–900 as weak hands exit and a small speculative community remains. The token gradually bleeds lower over 7–30 days without a new catalyst, eventually returning to near-zero activity.

No major new social media catalyst emerges
Sniper and whale selling continues at a moderate pace
Liquidity remains thin, preventing large price recoveries
Broader Solana meme market remains neutral to bearish

Bear Case

High probability

Sell pressure continues to dominate, price breaks below $0.0000494 support and retests the pre-pump base at $0.0000323 or lower. Whale and sniper distribution overwhelms thin liquidity, causing a rapid price collapse of 50–90% from current levels. Holder count stabilizes or declines as speculative buyers exit.

82.3% sell pressure with no signs of reversal
Only $24K liquidity cannot absorb continued distribution
Snipers with 100–370% unrealized gains continuing to sell
No fundamental catalyst to sustain price above pump levels
Token dormant for 30+ days prior — no established community

Analysis details

Generated

May 1, 11:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-01 23:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Moralis on-chain token metadata API
PumpSwap DEX trading analytics
On-chain holder metrics and historical holder series
OHLC price candles (hourly, USD)
Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
Top 20 holder wallet data
Supply concentration metrics (top 10 / top 100)

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
Sniper USD amounts sniped are all listed as 'unknown' — precise sniper concentration % cannot be calculated
Sniper token balances are largely 'unknown' — remaining supply overhang from snipers cannot be quantified
Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are all unknown — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
No social media data or sentiment metrics available beyond description text
Token has only 30 days of holder history, with 29 days of dormancy — limited baseline for trend analysis
FDV discrepancy between metadata ($71,679.61) and trading analytics ($135,250) — likely reflects different price snapshots

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total capital loss. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GMEBAY a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell GMEBAY?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is GMEBAY ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 776 addresses (2026-05-01 23:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling GMEBAY?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is GMEBAY liquidity falling?

As of 2026-05-01 23:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $24,052.99. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for GMEBAY (GMEBAY)?

Is GMEBAY a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token dynamics and are prepared to lose 100% of invested capital. Absolutely not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. Position sizing should be minimal (e.g., <0.1% of portfolio) if engaging at all.

What are the key risks of holding GMEBAY?

Extreme sell pressure (82.3% of volume) with shallow $24K liquidity — price collapse risk is immediate • Sniper distribution ongoing — early buyers with 100–370%+ profits continue to sell into retail demand • Holder surge (+481 in 1 hour) may reflect bot activity or coordinated pump, not organic adoption