GMEBAY

GMEBAY Price Today & AI Analysis

GMEBAY
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 1, 2026

8n58q3pUr7VK3jhCXfx75rPLiygRWLuSSiyxP7aapump

$0.056615

+12.80%

FDV $6,614

LiveContract:8n58q3pUr7VK3jhCXfx75rPLiygRWLuSSiyxP7aapumpChain:SolanaHolders:226Market cap:$6,614

More tokens on Solana

TinyWorld

TinyWorld

Tiny World Builder

$0.0565840.8%
MC $6.6K
Chameleon

Chameleon

Meccha Chameleon

$0.0411294.3%
MC $11.3K
BODUKE

BODUKE

Bo Duke

$0.0555708.2%
MC $5.6K
Clawd

Clawd

Clawd

$0.0414927.8%
MC $12.2K
SERIOUS

SERIOUS

Serious Cat

$0.0551747.6%
MC $5.2K
STONK

STONK

STONK

$0.303648.5%
MC $258.92M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about GMEBAY

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of May 1, 11:19 PM
FDV

$71,680

Liquidity

$24,053

Holders

776

Snipers

31

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

GMEBAY (8n58q3pUr7VK3jhCXfx75rPLiygRWLuSSiyxP7aapump) is a Solana meme token themed around a fictional acquisition of eBay by GameStop Corp. Launched on PumpSwap, it carries a fully diluted valuation of ~$71.7K (on-chain analytics show $135.25K FDV) with ~$24K in total liquidity. The token experienced a sharp spike in the last 24 hours — holders surged from 61 to 776 (+92%) — but sell pressure is overwhelming at 82.3% of volume. The token is unverified, has unknown update authority, and exhibits classic pump-and-dump risk patterns.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Meme narrative tied to a fictional GME/EBAY corporate acquisition
Explosive 24h holder growth (+715 holders, +92%) concentrated almost entirely in the last hour (+481)
Severe sell-side dominance: 82.3% sell pressure ($336.87K sell vs $72.66K buy volume)
Very low liquidity ($24.05K) relative to trading volume, creating extreme slippage risk
20 snipers identified in first 1000 blocks, majority in profit — elevated dump risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token spiked from ~$0.0000323 to a high of ~$0.000256 within the last two hourly candles before closing at $0.0000717 — a sharp rejection from the high. With 82.3% sell pressure, 5,777 sells vs 1,462 buys, and only $24K liquidity, further downside is the most probable near-term outcome. The 5m and 1h changes are marginally positive (+2.4% and +0.7%), suggesting a brief consolidation, but the structural sell imbalance is dominant.

Target low$0.0000323
Target high$0.000120
Support: $0.0000494 (candle [1] low), $0.0000323 (candle [2] open / prior base)
Resistance: $0.000120 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close), $0.000159 (candle [1] high), $0.000256 (candle [2] all-time high)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Without a sustained narrative catalyst or significant new liquidity inflows, the token is likely to bleed back toward its pre-pump base. The meme concept (GME acquiring EBAY) has no fundamental backing. Holder growth was almost entirely concentrated in a single hour, suggesting coordinated activity rather than organic adoption. Sniper profits are largely unrealized or partially taken — continued distribution is expected.

Catalysts
  • Viral social media pickup of the GME/EBAY narrative
  • Broader Solana meme season momentum
  • New liquidity pool additions or CEX listing (highly unlikely at this FDV)
  • Sniper and whale sell-off completing, allowing price stabilization

Bullish factors

  • 20.2% 24h price gain despite heavy sell pressure
  • Holder count surged +92% in 24h, indicating viral attention
  • Meme narrative (GME/EBAY) has proven retail appeal in past cycles
  • Some snipers still holding (e.g., sniper #15 holds $107, sniper #19 holds $97), suggesting not all early buyers have exited

Bearish factors

  • 82.3% sell pressure — 5,777 sells vs 1,462 buys in 24h
  • Only $24.05K total liquidity — any moderate sell order causes severe slippage
  • Price closed well below the session high ($0.000256 high → $0.0000717 close = -72% from peak)
  • Holder growth almost entirely in last 1 hour (+481 of +715 total 24h gain) — likely bot/coordinated activity
  • Unverified contract, unknown update authority, mutable=false but authority unknown
  • FDV of only ~$71.7K with no real utility or roadmap
Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, providing extremely limited price history. The 30-day holder data shows the token was dormant at 61 holders until a sudden spike. Sniper USD amounts are unknown, making precise supply-side pressure calculations impossible. Confidence is low due to data sparsity and extreme volatility.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (22:00 UTC): O=$0.0000332, H=$0.000256, L=$0.0000323, C=$0.000120 — a massive bullish spike with a long upper wick, closing near the midpoint of the range. Volume was extremely high at $338.7K. Candle [1] (23:00 UTC): O=$0.000118, H=$0.000160, L=$0.0000490, C=$0.0000717 — opened near candle [2]'s close, failed to sustain momentum, closed near the low with a long upper wick. Volume dropped sharply to $54.5K. The two-candle pattern shows a classic pump-and-dump: explosive spike followed by immediate rejection and close near session lows. The bearish engulfing / shooting star structure on candle [1] is a strong reversal signal.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 18%Sell 82%

Short-term trend is clearly bearish — price peaked at $0.000256 and has since rejected to $0.0000717, a -72% drawdown from the spike high within 2 hours. Medium-term is sideways/unknown given the token was dormant for 30 days prior to this event.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000494 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.0000323 (candle [2] low / pre-pump base)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000120 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close)
Major$0.000256 (candle [2] all-time high spike)

The $0.0000494 level is the most recent swing low and first line of defense. A break below it opens the door to the pre-pump base at $0.0000323. On the upside, $0.000120 is the first meaningful resistance (prior close), with $0.000159 and $0.000256 as progressively stronger resistance levels from the spike wicks.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing on candle [1] — strong reversal signal after spike
  • Pump-and-dump two-candle structure: explosive spike followed by immediate rejection
  • Volume climax on candle [2] with 84% volume drop on candle [1] — classic distribution signature
  • Long upper wicks on both candles indicate strong selling pressure at higher prices
  • Price closed in the lower quartile of candle [1]'s range — bearish close

Total holders776
24h Δ+92
7d Δ+92
30d Δ+92
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The explosive holder growth (+715 holders in 24h, with +481 in the last hour alone) directly correlates with the price spike observed in the two available OHLC candles. The token was dormant at 61 holders for the entire 30-day historical period prior to this event, suggesting the holder surge is entirely driven by the pump event rather than organic adoption. The correlation is high but likely reflects speculative entry rather than genuine community building.

The historical holder data reveals the token sat at a flat 59–62 holders for the entire month of April 2026, with zero net growth on most days. The sudden surge to 776 holders (+715, +92%) occurred almost entirely within the last 24 hours — and critically, +481 of those holders joined in the last hour alone. This extreme acceleration is a hallmark of viral meme pump events. The acquisition method breakdown (769 via swap, 7 via transfer, 0 via airdrop) confirms these are market buyers, not airdrop recipients. However, the concentration of growth in a single hour raises concerns about bot activity or coordinated wallet creation. The holder distribution (whales=165, sharks=82, dolphins=314, fish=110, octopus=62) shows a surprisingly high whale count relative to total holders, which is atypical and may indicate large-position holders entering during the spike.

Top 10 hold34.22%
Top 100 hold78.54%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

7Czaej8qJ2mJepfuTV7nVFnhanYyBoYEYQZYL45uVqKY

DEX liquidity pool — this address matches the PumpSwap pair address listed in the price data (Pair: 7Czaej8qJ2mJepfuTV7nVFnhanYyBoYEYQZYL45uVqKY)

13.97%

3aobgJJDNT8Y1HCTuo6rxv2Y7cauSDJjKDw8eH1eKRPk

Individual whale — large position, no contract indicators, likely early buyer or team-adjacent wallet

3.88%

Lwqn5cNpQvM56Q9hiasERTtnANU8eSLN6Hdwb6ELzrD

Individual whale — mid-tier holder, acquisition method unknown

2.49%

GRRiSkTjMn7HLxd5wSPvvE2UENCmyHMGonFPM8XLCRqG

Individual whale — similar profile to holder #3

2.45%

8n5Ef61Gg7RNPrNDJGPP6wWZVy7qiWm2tmrpgcXaDMyE

Individual whale — may be project treasury or early insider given proximity to mint address naming convention

2.31%

The top 10 holders control 34.22% of supply, and the top 100 control 78.54% — indicating a concentrated distribution. Critically, the #1 holder (13.97%) is the PumpSwap liquidity pool address, which is expected and not a concern in itself. Excluding the LP, the next largest holder controls 3.88% of supply. Holders #2 through #10 each hold between 1.54% and 3.88%, suggesting a cluster of individual whales or early buyers who accumulated during the pre-pump dormant phase. The high whale count (165 classified as whales out of 776 total holders) relative to total holders is unusual and warrants caution. With 78.54% of supply in the top 100 wallets and only $24K liquidity, coordinated selling by even a few top holders could be catastrophic for price.

Liquidity$24,050
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$72,660
Sell$336,870
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers520
Unique sellers1,871

Liquidity is critically shallow at $24.05K on a single PumpSwap pool (7Czaej8qJ2mJepfuTV7nVFnhanYyBoYEYQZYL45uVqKY). The 24h trading volume of ~$409.5K is approximately 17x the total liquidity — an extreme ratio that guarantees severe slippage on any meaningful order. The sell-to-buy ratio is stark: 5,777 sells vs 1,462 buys, with 1,871 unique sellers vs 520 unique buyers. Net flow is heavily outbound. The FDV of $135.25K (per analytics) vs $24.05K liquidity means the token is extremely illiquid relative to its implied market cap. Any whale exit from the top non-LP holders (3.88% = ~38.8M tokens) would likely move price 30–50%+ given current depth. Market health is poor.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,996,657.06
FDV$71,679.61

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a total supply of ~1 billion tokens (999,996,657.06) with 6 decimals, consistent with standard PumpFun/PumpSwap launches. The FDV is $71,679.61 at current price. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is unverified. The token is marked as mutable=false, which is a positive signal (metadata cannot be changed), but mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from available data. The token is not flagged as spam but is also not verified. The description references a fictional corporate acquisition (GameStop buying eBay), which is purely a meme narrative with no fundamental backing. No vesting schedules, team allocations, or tokenomics documentation are available. The 'pump' suffix in the mint address (8n58q3pUr7VK3jhCXfx75rPLiygRWLuSSiyxP7aapump) confirms this was launched via PumpFun infrastructure.

Volatility
high

Price moved from $0.0000323 to $0.000256 (+692%) and back to $0.0000717 (-72% from high) within 2 hours. Extreme intraday volatility with only 2 candles of history available.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $24.05K against $409K+ in 24h volume. The liquidity-to-volume ratio of ~1:17 guarantees severe slippage. A single whale exit could drain the pool.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 34.22% of supply; top 100 control 78.54%. Excluding the LP pool (13.97%), the next largest holder controls 3.88%. High whale count (165 of 776 holders) relative to total holders.

SniperDump
high

20 snipers identified in first 1,000 blocks. 14 of 20 have already sold, with realized PnLs of 56–371%. Remaining snipers with open positions (e.g., $97, $107 balances) represent ongoing dump risk. Total known sniper sell proceeds exceed $14K.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown' — cannot confirm if mint or freeze authority has been renounced. Token is unverified. Mutable=false is a positive signal but insufficient to fully mitigate authority risk without confirmed renouncement.

Key risks

  • Extreme sell pressure (82.3% of volume) with shallow $24K liquidity — price collapse risk is immediate
  • Sniper distribution ongoing — early buyers with 100–370%+ profits continue to sell into retail demand
  • Holder surge (+481 in 1 hour) may reflect bot activity or coordinated pump, not organic adoption
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for supply manipulation cannot be ruled out
  • No verified contract, no utility, no roadmap — pure speculative meme with fictional narrative
  • Token was dormant for 30+ days before spike — suggests coordinated launch timing

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable=false metadata reduces risk of rug via metadata manipulation
  • LP pool holds 13.97% of supply, providing some baseline liquidity
  • Not flagged as spam by Moralis
  • Some snipers still holding suggests not all early buyers have exited simultaneously
  • Meme narrative (GME/EBAY) has demonstrated retail appeal in past market cycles
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token dynamics and are prepared to lose 100% of invested capital. Absolutely not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. Position sizing should be minimal (e.g., <0.1% of portfolio) if engaging at all.

GMEBAY is a high-risk, low-FDV meme token that experienced a coordinated pump event on May 1, 2026. The token has no utility, no verified contract, and no fundamental value proposition beyond its meme narrative. The risk/reward profile is extremely unfavorable at current prices given the overwhelming sell pressure, shallow liquidity, and active sniper distribution. The only viable thesis is a short-term speculative trade on meme momentum, which carries very high probability of loss.

Bull case (low)

Viral meme momentum drives sustained retail FOMO, pushing price back toward the $0.000159–$0.000256 spike range. New liquidity enters the pool, reducing slippage risk. The GME/EBAY narrative gains traction on social media (Twitter/X, Reddit), attracting a new wave of buyers that absorbs sniper and whale selling pressure.

  • Viral social media spread of GME/EBAY acquisition meme
  • Broader Solana meme season with elevated retail participation
  • New market makers or liquidity providers entering the pool
  • Sniper selling completing, removing overhead supply pressure

Base case

Price consolidates in the $0.0000494–$0.000120 range over the next 24–72 hours as initial pump excitement fades. Volume declines significantly. Holder count stabilizes around 700–900 as weak hands exit and a small speculative community remains. The token gradually bleeds lower over 7–30 days without a new catalyst, eventually returning to near-zero activity.

  • No major new social media catalyst emerges
  • Sniper and whale selling continues at a moderate pace
  • Liquidity remains thin, preventing large price recoveries
  • Broader Solana meme market remains neutral to bearish

Bear case (high)

Sell pressure continues to dominate, price breaks below $0.0000494 support and retests the pre-pump base at $0.0000323 or lower. Whale and sniper distribution overwhelms thin liquidity, causing a rapid price collapse of 50–90% from current levels. Holder count stabilizes or declines as speculative buyers exit.

  • 82.3% sell pressure with no signs of reversal
  • Only $24K liquidity cannot absorb continued distribution
  • Snipers with 100–370% unrealized gains continuing to sell
  • No fundamental catalyst to sustain price above pump levels
  • Token dormant for 30+ days prior — no established community

GeneratedMay 1, 11:19 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of ~2026-05-01T23:00 UTC. OHLC data covers only 2 hourly candles. Historical holder data covers 30 days (April 1 – April 30, 2026) with the most recent spike reflected in the 24h/1h metrics.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics
  • On-chain holder metrics and historical holder series
  • OHLC price candles (hourly, USD)
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
  • Top 20 holder wallet data
  • Supply concentration metrics (top 10 / top 100)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Sniper USD amounts sniped are all listed as 'unknown' — precise sniper concentration % cannot be calculated
  • Sniper token balances are largely 'unknown' — remaining supply overhang from snipers cannot be quantified
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are all unknown — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
  • No social media data or sentiment metrics available beyond description text
  • Token has only 30 days of holder history, with 29 days of dormancy — limited baseline for trend analysis
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($71,679.61) and trading analytics ($135,250) — likely reflects different price snapshots

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total capital loss. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,996,657.06

Key Risks

•Extreme sell pressure (82.3% of volume) with shallow $24K liquidity — price collapse risk is immediate
•Sniper distribution ongoing — early buyers with 100–370%+ profits continue to sell into retail demand
•Holder surge (+481 in 1 hour) may reflect bot activity or coordinated pump, not organic adoption
•Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for supply manipulation cannot be ruled out

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

medium confidence
High risk

Of 20 snipers identified in the first 1,000 blocks, the majority are in profit and have been actively selling. 14 of 20 snipers have recorded realized sales. Realized PnL percentages range from -0.0% to +371.7%, with the median sniper well in profit. The high sell-through rate and strong realized gains indicate early buyers have been systematically distributing into retail demand. Sniper balances are largely unknown (listed as 'unknown'), but several show $0 balance, confirming full exits. A few snipers still hold positions ($25, $97, $107, $1), representing residual risk of further selling.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateMostly In Profit
Sell-through rateHigh
Profit-taking risk
high

Sniper USD amounts sniped are unknown; however, of 20 identified snipers, 14 have sold portions of their positions. Notable sellers include sniper #12 (sold $7,186, +203.1% PnL), sniper #10 (sold $1,276, +56.6%), sniper #11 (sold $1,153, +172.1%), sniper #7 (sold $1,224, +130.6%), and sniper #9 (sold $910, +106.3%). Total known sell proceeds from snipers exceed $14,000.

Early buyers (snipers) are predominantly in profit and actively distributing. The top sniper by proceeds (sniper #12) realized +203.1% profit on $7,186 in sales. Multiple snipers achieved 100–370%+ returns. Sentiment among early buyers is one of profit-taking and exit, not accumulation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for GMEBAY (GMEBAY)?

The token spiked from ~$0.0000323 to a high of ~$0.000256 within the last two hourly candles before closing at $0.0000717 — a sharp rejection from the high. With 82.3% sell pressure, 5,777 sells vs 1,462 buys, and only $24K liquidity, further downside is the most probable near-term outcome. The 5m and 1h changes are marginally positive (+2.4% and +0.7%), suggesting a brief consolidation, but the structural sell imbalance is dominant. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000323 to $0.000120.

Is GMEBAY a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token dynamics and are prepared to lose 100% of invested capital. Absolutely not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. Position sizing should be minimal (e.g., <0.1% of portfolio) if engaging at all.

How are GMEBAY holders trending?

GMEBAY currently has 776 holders and is growing (24h: 92, 7d: 92, 30d: 92). The historical holder data reveals the token sat at a flat 59–62 holders for the entire month of April 2026, with zero net growth on most days. The sudden surge to 776 holders (+715, +92%) occurred almost entirely within the last 24 hours — and critically, +481 of those holders joined in the last hour alone. This extreme acceleration is a hallmark of viral meme pump events. The acquisition method breakdown (769 via swap, 7 via transfer, 0 via airdrop) confirms these are market buyers, not airdrop recipients. However, the concentration of growth in a single hour raises concerns about bot activity or coordinated wallet creation. The holder distribution (whales=165, sharks=82, dolphins=314, fish=110, octopus=62) shows a surprisingly high whale count relative to total holders, which is atypical and may indicate large-position holders entering during the spike.

What does sniper activity look like for GMEBAY?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "mostly_in_profit" and sell-through rate "high". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding GMEBAY?

Extreme sell pressure (82.3% of volume) with shallow $24K liquidity — price collapse risk is immediate • Sniper distribution ongoing — early buyers with 100–370%+ profits continue to sell into retail demand • Holder surge (+481 in 1 hour) may reflect bot activity or coordinated pump, not organic adoption

← Back to all predictions

Track GMEBAY