sharkdog Price Today & AI Analysis

sharkdogSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 25, 2026

$0.0₅5883

-3.67% 24h

Contract

Live

8gEtFeKeRt1QREkU51dRih9pQ39PyYpRRZTyLg2v5qFn

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,613

Market cap

$5,591

At a $1M market cap, $SHARKDOG would be $0.001052 (179x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is sharkdog a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 21

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about sharkdog

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

TYLERTyler Durden$0.0₅2318-1.0%MC $2.3K

REGULARSregulars$0.0₅3998-2.4%MC $3.8K

INUCUPWorld Inu Cup$0.0₅2656-1.8%MC $2.7K

wifchiKimchi Wif Hat$0.0₅2074-1.0%MC $2.1K

RUSHRush Trading$0.0₅9710-3.2%MC $9.7K

KimchiAura Final Boss$0.009727-41.3%MC $9.69M

sharkdog: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-25 12:17 UTC

Holder addresses

1,507

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$46,374.33

How concentrated is sharkdog ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,507 addresses (2026-07-25 12:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling sharkdog?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is sharkdog liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-25 12:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $46,374.33. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-25 12:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 25, 12:17 PM UTC

FDV

Liquidity

$46,374.33

Holders

1,507

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

sharkdog (SHARKDOG) is a newly-launched Solana meme token on PumpSwap with a total supply of 1 (likely a fractional/NFT-style token or a display artifact), currently priced at ~$0.000159. The token experienced an extraordinary 572% price spike within 24 hours, accompanied by a massive surge in holders from 53 to 1,507 — almost entirely within the last hour. However, sell pressure is overwhelming (77.4% of volume), liquidity is thin at $46.37K, and the token is unverified with mutable metadata and unknown update authority. These are significant red flags consistent with a pump-and-dump dynamic.

Key points

Total supply of 1 (formatted) — highly unusual, likely a fractional token or data anomaly
572% price spike in 24h with 77.4% sell pressure — classic pump-and-dump pattern
Holder count exploded from 53 to 1,507 in ~1 hour (96% growth in 24h)
Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk present
No top holder data available, supply concentration reported as 0% — data gap raises transparency concerns

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token is in a post-pump distribution phase. Sell pressure accounts for 77.4% of 24h volume ($398.32K sells vs $116.20K buys). The most recent 5-minute change is already -3.39%, and the hourly candle shows a close near the high ($0.000163) after an explosive prior candle that ranged from $0.0000190 to $0.000245. A sharp retracement toward the prior base is likely.

Target low

$0.000019

Target high

$0.000163

Support: $0.000147 (hourly candle low, candle [1]), $0.000019 (hourly candle low, candle [2] — launch base)
Resistance: $0.000163 (hourly candle high, candle [1] — current close), $0.000245 (hourly candle high, candle [2] — spike peak)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Without sustained buy-side demand, new utility, or community development, the token is likely to retrace most of its pump gains. The historical holder base was flat at 53 for 30 days before the sudden spike, suggesting no organic growth prior to the pump event. Thin liquidity ($46.37K) means even moderate selling will cause severe price impact.

Catalysts

Any renewed social media attention could trigger a secondary pump
Whale accumulation at depressed prices could stabilize the floor
Listing on additional venues could bring new buyers
Absence of any of the above will accelerate decline

Bullish factors

572% price appreciation demonstrates strong initial speculative interest
1,507 holders acquired in ~1 hour shows viral traction potential
Active trading with 2,361 unique wallets in 24h indicates broad awareness
PumpSwap listing provides accessible on-chain liquidity

Bearish factors

77.4% sell pressure ($398.32K sells vs $116.20K buys) — heavily skewed to distribution
Liquidity of only $46.37K is extremely thin relative to $398.32K in sell volume
Holder base was completely flat (53 holders) for 30 days prior to pump — no organic growth
Mutable metadata and unknown update authority — rug/manipulation risk
Unverified contract with no description or project documentation
5-minute price already declining -3.39% post-pump peak
Total supply reported as 1 — data anomaly that undermines tokenomics analysis

Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, providing minimal technical history. The token is extremely new, unverified, and lacks top holder transparency. The data anomaly around total supply (reported as 1) further reduces analytical confidence. Predictions are based primarily on volume/pressure ratios and holder trend patterns.

sharkdog call history

Full track record →

Jul 25bearish@ $0.000159

24h+194.3%

7d-86.2%

30d-95.3%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 8gEtFe...5qFn
Total Supply: 1 (formatted) — likely a fractional/sub-unit token; actual raw supply unknown

Key Risks

Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector
Total supply anomaly (reported as 1) — tokenomics are opaque and potentially misleading
77.4% sell pressure with 3:1 seller-to-buyer ratio — active distribution by early holders
Critically thin liquidity ($46.37K) relative to trading volume ($514.52K in 24h)

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (11:00 UTC) was an explosive launch candle: Open $0.0000318, High $0.000245, Low $0.0000190, Close $0.000157 — a massive wick-heavy candle with a close well below the high, indicating strong selling into the pump. Candle [1] (12:00 UTC) opened at $0.000155 (near prior close), reached a high of $0.000163, low of $0.000147, and closed at $0.000163 — a bullish close but on dramatically lower volume (88,299 vs 390,734). The upper wick on candle [2] is a classic 'shooting star' / pump-and-dump signal.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price is technically in an uptrend from the launch base (~$0.0000190) to current ~$0.000163, but the dominant candle [2] shows a massive rejection from the $0.000245 high. The medium-term trend is effectively undefined given only 2 candles of history; classified as sideways pending further data.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

23%

Sell

77%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000147 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.0000190 (candle [2] absolute low — launch base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000163 (candle [1] high / current close)

Major resistance

$0.000245 (candle [2] spike high — all-time high)

The $0.000147 level is the nearest support from the most recent hourly low. A break below this opens a path to the $0.0000190 launch base. On the upside, $0.000163 is the current close/resistance, and $0.000245 is the all-time high spike that was heavily rejected.

Notable patterns

Shooting star / upper wick rejection on candle [2] — bearish reversal signal
Volume climax on candle [2] followed by sharp volume decline on candle [1] — distribution pattern
Price closed well below the high on the launch candle — classic pump-and-dump candle structure
Narrow-range candle [1] after explosive candle [2] — momentum exhaustion

Liquidity

$46,374.33

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $46.37K against a fully diluted valuation of $155.54K — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of only ~30%. More alarmingly, 24h sell volume of $398.32K is 8.6x the total available liquidity, meaning the pool has been churned multiple times over. The net flow is strongly negative (outflow): $398.32K in sells vs $116.20K in buys = net outflow of ~$282K. With 2,216 unique sellers vs only 665 unique buyers (3.3:1 ratio), the market structure is clearly distributional. High slippage risk means any significant sell order will move the price substantially. The PumpSwap pair (4RM2wYs8vaFJF345Tf9CKHqNjyf6ttSKLJiYgdiFWKmV) is the sole liquidity venue.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1 (formatted) — likely a fractional/sub-unit token; actual raw supply unknown

FDV

$155,540

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
572% price increase in 24h followed by immediate -3.39% in 5 minutes. Only 2 hourly candles available, both showing extreme volatility. The launch candle ranged from $0.0000190 to $0.000245 — a 12x intrabar range.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of $46.37K is critically thin. Sell volume of $398.32K in 24h is 8.6x the liquidity pool. Any meaningful exit will cause severe slippage and price impact.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector
Total supply anomaly (reported as 1) — tokenomics are opaque and potentially misleading
77.4% sell pressure with 3:1 seller-to-buyer ratio — active distribution by early holders
Critically thin liquidity ($46.37K) relative to trading volume ($514.52K in 24h)
30-day flat holder base of 53 followed by 1-hour explosion — artificial pump pattern
No top holder data available — zero transparency on concentration
Unverified, undescribed token with no project documentation
Single liquidity venue (PumpSwap) with no diversification

Mitigating factors

Token is not flagged as spam by the data provider
Has a Twitter social link (though unverified)
Active trading with 2,361 unique wallets suggests genuine market interest at some level
PumpSwap listing provides at least some on-chain liquidity and price discovery

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for immediate total loss. This is not an investment — it is a speculative gamble on a likely pump-and-dump.

sharkdog exhibits nearly every hallmark of a pump-and-dump scheme: a 30-day dormant holder base that exploded in one hour, overwhelming sell pressure (77.4%), critically thin liquidity, unknown/mutable authorities, missing top holder data, and an anomalous total supply. The only bullish case is a secondary pump driven by social momentum, which is speculative and time-sensitive. The base and bear cases both point to significant price decline from current levels.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Secondary pump driven by viral social media attention. If the Twitter presence gains traction and new buyers enter faster than current holders exit, a second wave could push price back toward the $0.000245 all-time high or beyond.

Viral social media momentum on Twitter
New whale accumulation at current prices
Broader meme coin market rally lifting all tokens
Coordinated community effort to sustain price

Base Case

Gradual price erosion over 24-72 hours as the initial pump excitement fades. Price stabilizes somewhere between $0.000030–$0.000080 as speculative interest wanes and a small residual holder base remains.

Some buyers hold positions hoping for a secondary pump
Liquidity pool is not fully drained
No rug pull or metadata manipulation occurs
No significant new catalysts emerge to reignite buying

Bear Case

High probability

Rapid collapse back toward launch base. Early holders (who acquired at ~$0.0000190) continue distributing into any remaining buy pressure, draining the thin $46.37K liquidity pool and causing a 85-90% price decline from current levels.

Dominant sell pressure (77.4%) continues or accelerates
Thin liquidity amplifies price impact of each sell
No fundamental value or utility to attract long-term holders
Mutable metadata creates uncertainty that deters new buyers
FOMO buyers from the pump begin to panic-sell at losses

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 25, 12:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-25 12:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (Mint: 8gEtFeKeRt1QREkU51dRih9pQ39PyYpRRZTyLg2v5qFn)
PumpSwap pair data (4RM2wYs8vaFJF345Tf9CKHqNjyf6ttSKLJiYgdiFWKmV)
Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
OHLC candle data (2 hourly candles, 2026-07-25)
Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
Holder acquisition breakdown (swap/transfer/airdrop)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
Top holder data entirely unavailable — whale map cannot be properly constructed
Total supply reported as 1 (formatted) — tokenomics analysis is severely limited
Mint and freeze authority status unknown — rug risk cannot be fully quantified
No sniper data available — early buyer behavior cannot be directly assessed
Update authority field returns 'unknown' — cannot confirm or deny renouncement
Supply concentration metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%) appear to be data artifacts, not genuine figures
Token is less than 24 hours old — all metrics are based on extremely limited history

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially newly-launched meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed shows multiple high-risk indicators consistent with pump-and-dump activity. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Always conduct your own research (DYOR).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is sharkdog a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 21, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell sharkdog?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 21, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is sharkdog ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,507 addresses (2026-07-25 12:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling sharkdog?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is sharkdog liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-25 12:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $46,374.33. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for sharkdog (sharkdog)?

Is sharkdog a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for immediate total loss. This is not an investment — it is a speculative gamble on a likely pump-and-dump.

What are the key risks of holding sharkdog?

Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector • Total supply anomaly (reported as 1) — tokenomics are opaque and potentially misleading • 77.4% sell pressure with 3:1 seller-to-buyer ratio — active distribution by early holders