sharkdog

sharkdog Price Today & AI Analysis

sharkdog
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 25, 2026

8gEtFeKeRt1QREkU51dRih9pQ39PyYpRRZTyLg2v5qFn

$0.057413

-3.99%

FDV $7,046

LiveContract:8gEtFeKeRt1QREkU51dRih9pQ39PyYpRRZTyLg2v5qFnChain:SolanaHolders:1,722Market cap:$7,046

More tokens on Solana

MemesAI

MemesAI

MemesAI

$0.0001283.1%
MC $128.0K
Flea

Flea

Flea The Claynosaur

$0.0566473.4%
MC $6.6K
CASHLESS

CASHLESS

CASHLESS

$0.0531045.9%
MC $3.1K
blockfirm

blockfirm

blockfirm

$0.0422811.5%
MC $21.8K
BlueBuck

BlueBuck

Blue Buck

$0.0542740.2%
MC $4.3K
RAY

RAY

Raydium

$1.192.6%
MC $659.62M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about sharkdog

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 25, 12:17 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$46,374

Holders

1,507

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

sharkdog (SHARKDOG) is a newly-launched Solana meme token on PumpSwap with a total supply of 1 (likely a fractional/NFT-style token or a display artifact), currently priced at ~$0.000159. The token experienced an extraordinary 572% price spike within 24 hours, accompanied by a massive surge in holders from 53 to 1,507 — almost entirely within the last hour. However, sell pressure is overwhelming (77.4% of volume), liquidity is thin at $46.37K, and the token is unverified with mutable metadata and unknown update authority. These are significant red flags consistent with a pump-and-dump dynamic.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Total supply of 1 (formatted) — highly unusual, likely a fractional token or data anomaly
572% price spike in 24h with 77.4% sell pressure — classic pump-and-dump pattern
Holder count exploded from 53 to 1,507 in ~1 hour (96% growth in 24h)
Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk present
No top holder data available, supply concentration reported as 0% — data gap raises transparency concerns

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token is in a post-pump distribution phase. Sell pressure accounts for 77.4% of 24h volume ($398.32K sells vs $116.20K buys). The most recent 5-minute change is already -3.39%, and the hourly candle shows a close near the high ($0.000163) after an explosive prior candle that ranged from $0.0000190 to $0.000245. A sharp retracement toward the prior base is likely.

Target low$0.000019
Target high$0.000163
Support: $0.000147 (hourly candle low, candle [1]), $0.000019 (hourly candle low, candle [2] — launch base)
Resistance: $0.000163 (hourly candle high, candle [1] — current close), $0.000245 (hourly candle high, candle [2] — spike peak)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Without sustained buy-side demand, new utility, or community development, the token is likely to retrace most of its pump gains. The historical holder base was flat at 53 for 30 days before the sudden spike, suggesting no organic growth prior to the pump event. Thin liquidity ($46.37K) means even moderate selling will cause severe price impact.

Catalysts
  • Any renewed social media attention could trigger a secondary pump
  • Whale accumulation at depressed prices could stabilize the floor
  • Listing on additional venues could bring new buyers
  • Absence of any of the above will accelerate decline

Bullish factors

  • 572% price appreciation demonstrates strong initial speculative interest
  • 1,507 holders acquired in ~1 hour shows viral traction potential
  • Active trading with 2,361 unique wallets in 24h indicates broad awareness
  • PumpSwap listing provides accessible on-chain liquidity

Bearish factors

  • 77.4% sell pressure ($398.32K sells vs $116.20K buys) — heavily skewed to distribution
  • Liquidity of only $46.37K is extremely thin relative to $398.32K in sell volume
  • Holder base was completely flat (53 holders) for 30 days prior to pump — no organic growth
  • Mutable metadata and unknown update authority — rug/manipulation risk
  • Unverified contract with no description or project documentation
  • 5-minute price already declining -3.39% post-pump peak
  • Total supply reported as 1 — data anomaly that undermines tokenomics analysis
Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, providing minimal technical history. The token is extremely new, unverified, and lacks top holder transparency. The data anomaly around total supply (reported as 1) further reduces analytical confidence. Predictions are based primarily on volume/pressure ratios and holder trend patterns.

sharkdog call history

Full track record →
Jul 25bearish
24h+194.3%
7d-86.2%
30d-95.3%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (11:00 UTC) was an explosive launch candle: Open $0.0000318, High $0.000245, Low $0.0000190, Close $0.000157 — a massive wick-heavy candle with a close well below the high, indicating strong selling into the pump. Candle [1] (12:00 UTC) opened at $0.000155 (near prior close), reached a high of $0.000163, low of $0.000147, and closed at $0.000163 — a bullish close but on dramatically lower volume (88,299 vs 390,734). The upper wick on candle [2] is a classic 'shooting star' / pump-and-dump signal.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 23%Sell 77%

Short-term price is technically in an uptrend from the launch base (~$0.0000190) to current ~$0.000163, but the dominant candle [2] shows a massive rejection from the $0.000245 high. The medium-term trend is effectively undefined given only 2 candles of history; classified as sideways pending further data.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000147 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.0000190 (candle [2] absolute low — launch base)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000163 (candle [1] high / current close)
Major$0.000245 (candle [2] spike high — all-time high)

The $0.000147 level is the nearest support from the most recent hourly low. A break below this opens a path to the $0.0000190 launch base. On the upside, $0.000163 is the current close/resistance, and $0.000245 is the all-time high spike that was heavily rejected.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / upper wick rejection on candle [2] — bearish reversal signal
  • Volume climax on candle [2] followed by sharp volume decline on candle [1] — distribution pattern
  • Price closed well below the high on the launch candle — classic pump-and-dump candle structure
  • Narrow-range candle [1] after explosive candle [2] — momentum exhaustion

Total holders1,507
24h Δ+96
7d Δ+96
30d Δ+96
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder explosion from 53 to 1,507 (+1,454 holders, +96%) occurred almost entirely within the last hour (+1,172 in 1h, +78%), perfectly coinciding with the 572% price spike. This is a strong positive correlation between price pump and holder acquisition, but it is characteristic of FOMO-driven entry rather than organic community growth.

The historical holder data reveals a deeply concerning pattern: the holder count was completely flat at exactly 53 for the entire 30-day period from June 25 to July 24, 2026 — zero net change across 30 consecutive days. Then, within a single hour on July 25, 1,172 new holders appeared, bringing the total to 1,507. This is not organic growth — it is a sudden influx of speculative buyers attracted by the price pump. The 30-day stagnation followed by a single-hour explosion is a textbook pump-and-dump holder acquisition pattern. The 7d and 30d growth figures both show 96% because the growth is entirely concentrated in the last ~1 hour.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token — the API returned no top holders. The supply concentration metrics report top10=0% and top100=0%, which is almost certainly a data artifact rather than a genuine reflection of distribution (a total supply of 1 formatted unit makes standard concentration metrics meaningless). The absence of holder transparency is itself a red flag. Given the token's total supply is reported as 1 (formatted), it is possible this is a fractional token where the entire supply is held by one or a very small number of addresses, making the whale map critically important but unfortunately unavailable. Investors should treat the lack of holder data as a significant transparency risk.

Liquidity$46,370
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$116,200
Sell$398,320
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers665
Unique sellers2,216

Liquidity is critically shallow at $46.37K against a fully diluted valuation of $155.54K — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of only ~30%. More alarmingly, 24h sell volume of $398.32K is 8.6x the total available liquidity, meaning the pool has been churned multiple times over. The net flow is strongly negative (outflow): $398.32K in sells vs $116.20K in buys = net outflow of ~$282K. With 2,216 unique sellers vs only 665 unique buyers (3.3:1 ratio), the market structure is clearly distributional. High slippage risk means any significant sell order will move the price substantially. The PumpSwap pair (4RM2wYs8vaFJF345Tf9CKHqNjyf6ttSKLJiYgdiFWKmV) is the sole liquidity venue.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (formatted) — likely a fractional/sub-unit token; actual raw supply unknown
FDV$155,540

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The tokenomics of sharkdog are highly anomalous. The total supply is reported as 1 (formatted with 0 decimals), which is extremely unusual for a meme token. This could indicate: (1) a display/API artifact, (2) a token with 0 decimals where 1 raw unit = 1 token, or (3) a fractional NFT-style token. The FDV of $155.54K at a price of $0.000159 implies a much larger raw supply than '1', suggesting the formatted supply figure is misleading or the decimals field is incorrect. Mint and freeze authority status are both unknown — the update authority field returns 'unknown' rather than a specific address or the burn address, so renouncement cannot be confirmed. The metadata is marked as mutable (Mutable: true), which means the token creator retains the ability to modify token metadata — a meaningful rug risk vector. The contract is unverified and has no description. These factors collectively represent high tokenomics-related risk.

Volatility
high

572% price increase in 24h followed by immediate -3.39% in 5 minutes. Only 2 hourly candles available, both showing extreme volatility. The launch candle ranged from $0.0000190 to $0.000245 — a 12x intrabar range.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of $46.37K is critically thin. Sell volume of $398.32K in 24h is 8.6x the liquidity pool. Any meaningful exit will cause severe slippage and price impact.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is entirely unavailable. Total supply is reported as 1 (formatted), suggesting extreme concentration in a tiny number of wallets. The 30-day flat holder count of 53 prior to the pump implies a very small, concentrated early holder base.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, but the trading pattern (7,911 sells vs 2,560 buys, 2,216 sellers vs 665 buyers) strongly implies early holders are dumping on new entrants. The 3:1 seller-to-buyer ratio is a strong dump signal.

Authority
high

Metadata is mutable (Mutable: true). Update authority is unknown — cannot confirm renouncement. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. Unverified contract. These factors leave the door open for rug pulls, metadata manipulation, or supply inflation.

Key risks

  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector
  • Total supply anomaly (reported as 1) — tokenomics are opaque and potentially misleading
  • 77.4% sell pressure with 3:1 seller-to-buyer ratio — active distribution by early holders
  • Critically thin liquidity ($46.37K) relative to trading volume ($514.52K in 24h)
  • 30-day flat holder base of 53 followed by 1-hour explosion — artificial pump pattern
  • No top holder data available — zero transparency on concentration
  • Unverified, undescribed token with no project documentation
  • Single liquidity venue (PumpSwap) with no diversification

Mitigating factors

  • Token is not flagged as spam by the data provider
  • Has a Twitter social link (though unverified)
  • Active trading with 2,361 unique wallets suggests genuine market interest at some level
  • PumpSwap listing provides at least some on-chain liquidity and price discovery
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for immediate total loss. This is not an investment — it is a speculative gamble on a likely pump-and-dump.

sharkdog exhibits nearly every hallmark of a pump-and-dump scheme: a 30-day dormant holder base that exploded in one hour, overwhelming sell pressure (77.4%), critically thin liquidity, unknown/mutable authorities, missing top holder data, and an anomalous total supply. The only bullish case is a secondary pump driven by social momentum, which is speculative and time-sensitive. The base and bear cases both point to significant price decline from current levels.

Bull case (low)

Secondary pump driven by viral social media attention. If the Twitter presence gains traction and new buyers enter faster than current holders exit, a second wave could push price back toward the $0.000245 all-time high or beyond.

  • Viral social media momentum on Twitter
  • New whale accumulation at current prices
  • Broader meme coin market rally lifting all tokens
  • Coordinated community effort to sustain price

Base case

Gradual price erosion over 24-72 hours as the initial pump excitement fades. Price stabilizes somewhere between $0.000030–$0.000080 as speculative interest wanes and a small residual holder base remains.

  • Some buyers hold positions hoping for a secondary pump
  • Liquidity pool is not fully drained
  • No rug pull or metadata manipulation occurs
  • No significant new catalysts emerge to reignite buying

Bear case (high)

Rapid collapse back toward launch base. Early holders (who acquired at ~$0.0000190) continue distributing into any remaining buy pressure, draining the thin $46.37K liquidity pool and causing a 85-90% price decline from current levels.

  • Dominant sell pressure (77.4%) continues or accelerates
  • Thin liquidity amplifies price impact of each sell
  • No fundamental value or utility to attract long-term holders
  • Mutable metadata creates uncertainty that deters new buyers
  • FOMO buyers from the pump begin to panic-sell at losses

GeneratedJul 25, 12:17 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of analysis time. OHLC data covers 2 hourly candles ending 2026-07-25T12:00Z. Historical holder data covers 2026-06-25 to 2026-07-24 (30 days). Sniper data unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Mint: 8gEtFeKeRt1QREkU51dRih9pQ39PyYpRRZTyLg2v5qFn)
  • PumpSwap pair data (4RM2wYs8vaFJF345Tf9CKHqNjyf6ttSKLJiYgdiFWKmV)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • OHLC candle data (2 hourly candles, 2026-07-25)
  • Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
  • Holder acquisition breakdown (swap/transfer/airdrop)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top holder data entirely unavailable — whale map cannot be properly constructed
  • Total supply reported as 1 (formatted) — tokenomics analysis is severely limited
  • Mint and freeze authority status unknown — rug risk cannot be fully quantified
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior cannot be directly assessed
  • Update authority field returns 'unknown' — cannot confirm or deny renouncement
  • Supply concentration metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%) appear to be data artifacts, not genuine figures
  • Token is less than 24 hours old — all metrics are based on extremely limited history

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially newly-launched meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed shows multiple high-risk indicators consistent with pump-and-dump activity. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Always conduct your own research (DYOR).

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (formatted) — likely a fractional/sub-unit token; actual raw supply unknown

Key Risks

•Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector
•Total supply anomaly (reported as 1) — tokenomics are opaque and potentially misleading
•77.4% sell pressure with 3:1 seller-to-buyer ratio — active distribution by early holders
•Critically thin liquidity ($46.37K) relative to trading volume ($514.52K in 24h)

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper analysis data is available for sharkdog. The absence of sniper data means early-buyer concentration and PnL state cannot be assessed. However, the broader trading analytics paint a concerning picture: 7,911 sell transactions vs 2,560 buy transactions in 24h, with 2,216 unique sellers vs 665 unique buyers. This 3:1 seller-to-buyer ratio strongly implies early entrants are distributing to late buyers.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available for this token.

Likely distributing — the 3:1 ratio of sellers to buyers (2,216 vs 665) and 77.4% sell volume dominance suggests early holders who acquired at the $0.0000190 launch base are aggressively taking profits at current prices near $0.000159.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for sharkdog (sharkdog)?

The token is in a post-pump distribution phase. Sell pressure accounts for 77.4% of 24h volume ($398.32K sells vs $116.20K buys). The most recent 5-minute change is already -3.39%, and the hourly candle shows a close near the high ($0.000163) after an explosive prior candle that ranged from $0.0000190 to $0.000245. A sharp retracement toward the prior base is likely. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000019 to $0.000163.

Is sharkdog a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for immediate total loss. This is not an investment — it is a speculative gamble on a likely pump-and-dump.

How are sharkdog holders trending?

sharkdog currently has 1,507 holders and is growing (24h: 96, 7d: 96, 30d: 96). The historical holder data reveals a deeply concerning pattern: the holder count was completely flat at exactly 53 for the entire 30-day period from June 25 to July 24, 2026 — zero net change across 30 consecutive days. Then, within a single hour on July 25, 1,172 new holders appeared, bringing the total to 1,507. This is not organic growth — it is a sudden influx of speculative buyers attracted by the price pump. The 30-day stagnation followed by a single-hour explosion is a textbook pump-and-dump holder acquisition pattern. The 7d and 30d growth figures both show 96% because the growth is entirely concentrated in the last ~1 hour.

What does sniper activity look like for sharkdog?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding sharkdog?

Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector • Total supply anomaly (reported as 1) — tokenomics are opaque and potentially misleading • 77.4% sell pressure with 3:1 seller-to-buyer ratio — active distribution by early holders

← Back to all predictions

Track sharkdog