fluff

fluff Price Prediction 2026

fluff
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 17, 2026

8Hf1E4bBo7c3kccbWVrpWuZnTJ64tm6nqETTd1RZpump

$0.051658

FDV $1,657

LiveContract:8Hf1E4bBo7c3kccbWVrpWuZnTJ64tm6nqETTd1RZpumpChain:SolanaHolders:147Market cap:$1,657

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about fluff

Report snapshotas of May 17, 05:18 PM
FDV

$3,695

Liquidity

$0

Holders

231

Snipers

45

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

fluff (FLUFF) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana with a medieval cat theme. The token has a total supply of 1,000,000,000 and a fully diluted valuation of approximately $3,695 at the time of analysis. The token experienced a catastrophic -92.8% price drop in the past 24 hours, collapsing from a high of ~$0.000170 to ~$0.0000037. Supply is extremely concentrated, with the top holder (the PumpSwap liquidity pool address) controlling 76.93% of supply. Total holders stand at just 231, and reported liquidity is $0.00, indicating the token is effectively illiquid. This is a very high-risk, speculative micro-cap meme token.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Medieval cat meme theme with social presence (Telegram, Twitter, Website)
Launched via PumpFun/PumpSwap with rapid price discovery and collapse within hours
Extreme supply concentration: top 10 holders control 92.46% of supply
Only 231 total holders — extremely thin community base
Reported on-chain liquidity of $0.00 despite ~$1.35M in 24h combined volume

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token has already collapsed -92.8% in 24 hours, dropping from an intraday high of ~$0.000170 to ~$0.0000037. The most recent hourly candle (17:00 UTC) shows a massive wick down from $0.000166 open to a close of $0.0000037, confirming a near-total price collapse. With $0.00 reported liquidity, any further sell pressure could push the price to near zero. A brief 5-minute bounce of +13.5% was observed but is likely noise in an illiquid market.

Target low$0.0000010
Target high$0.0000070
Support: $0.0000037 (current price / recent close), $0.0000029 (candle [1] low)
Resistance: $0.0000148 (mid-range of candle [1]), $0.0000920 (candle [2] low), $0.000166 (candle [2] high / candle [1] open)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

With only 231 holders, $0 reported liquidity, and a 92.8% single-day collapse, recovery prospects are extremely limited. The holder base was flat at 177 for the entire prior 30-day period before a sudden +54 spike, suggesting the recent activity was a single pump-and-dump event. Without new catalysts, community growth, or liquidity injection, the token is likely to remain near zero or become completely abandoned.

Catalysts
  • Viral social media campaign driving new buyer interest
  • Listing on a centralized exchange (highly unlikely at this market cap)
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all micro-caps
  • Developer-led liquidity injection or token buyback

Bullish factors

  • 5-minute price bounce of +13.5% suggests residual speculative interest
  • 24h buy count (9,208) exceeds sell count (7,709), indicating some buyer participation
  • Social links present (Telegram, Twitter, Website) suggesting some community infrastructure
  • 20 snipers with majority in profit may have already exited, reducing future sell pressure

Bearish factors

  • Price collapsed -92.8% in 24 hours from ~$0.000170 to ~$0.0000037
  • Reported total liquidity is $0.00 — effectively no exit liquidity
  • Top holder (76.93%, likely the PumpSwap LP) dominates supply
  • Top 10 holders control 92.46% of supply — extreme concentration risk
  • Only 231 total holders — minimal community base
  • Holder count was flat at 177 for 30 consecutive days prior to this event
  • 1-hour price change of -97.5% confirms near-total collapse
  • FDV of only ~$3,695 — essentially a dead token by market cap standards
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme volatility, near-zero liquidity ($0.00 reported), only 3 OHLC candles available for technical analysis, and the token's very short observable price history. The data reflects a classic pump-and-dump pattern, making directional prediction beyond 'continued bearish pressure' unreliable.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle [3] (15:00 UTC): O=$0.0000424, H=$0.000148, L=$0.0000367, C=$0.000148 — a strong bullish candle with a large upper body, signaling the initial pump. Candle [2] (16:00 UTC): O=$0.000139, H=$0.000166, L=$0.0000920, C=$0.000166 — continuation of the pump, making a higher high at $0.000166. Candle [1] (17:00 UTC): O=$0.000166, H=$0.000170, L=$0.00000285, C=$0.0000037 — a catastrophic bearish engulfing / crash candle. The high of $0.000170 was the all-time peak, followed by a collapse to a low of $0.00000285, a drop of ~98.3% within a single hour. This is a textbook pump-and-dump pattern: two bullish candles followed by a single devastating crash candle.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 48%Sell 52%

The short-term trend is decisively bearish following the crash candle at 17:00 UTC. The medium-term trend is also bearish given the token's price is now ~97.8% below its intraday peak. There is no observable uptrend structure remaining.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000029 (candle [1] intraday low)
Major$0.0000010 (psychological near-zero floor)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000148 (mid-range of crash candle body)
Major$0.000166–$0.000170 (candle [1] open / all-time high zone)

The only meaningful support is the candle [1] low of ~$0.00000285. Below that, there is no observable price history to anchor support. Resistance levels are derived from the crash candle's open ($0.000166) and the all-time high wick ($0.000170). Given the token's near-zero liquidity, these levels are largely theoretical.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump pattern: two consecutive bullish candles followed by a single catastrophic crash candle
  • Bearish engulfing on candle [1]: opens at the prior close ($0.000166) and closes near zero ($0.0000037)
  • Long upper wick on candle [3] indicating early distribution at the pump peak
  • Higher highs across candles [3] and [2] (classic pump structure) before reversal
  • Dead-cat bounce: +13.5% 5-minute move after a -97.5% 1-hour collapse

Total holders231
24h Δ+23
7d Δ+23
30d Δ+23
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

The +54 holder increase (23% growth) over the past 24 hours correlates directly with the pump event, as new buyers entered during the price spike. However, the 1-hour holder change of -1,267 (-550%) is a severe anomaly — this likely reflects a data artifact or a mass exit/burn event rather than genuine organic holder loss, as the total holder count is only 231. Prior to this event, holders were completely flat at 177 for all 30 days of observable history (April 17 – May 16, 2026), indicating zero organic growth.

Holder data reveals a deeply concerning pattern. For the entire 30-day historical period (April 17 – May 16), holders were frozen at exactly 177 with zero net change on any day. This suggests the token was dormant or inactive for a full month before the May 17 pump event. The sudden +54 holder increase on May 17 coincides with the pump-and-dump, meaning new holders likely bought at or near the top and are now deeply underwater. The reported -1,267 holder change in 1 hour is anomalous and may reflect a data error. Overall, holder growth is not organic and does not signal healthy community development.

Top 10 hold92.46%
Top 100 hold99.54%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

3fMgZDwTjQFZAtorE7zyCvsFhSTf8YG5bqW4zFDMUTTU

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address — matches the trading pair address listed in price data)

76.93%

AxG1rUK1zgyWbCUArezru212izh88PYe6hZZhnpsPxNY

Individual whale / early buyer

3.61%

7yWCw8wAuH7UY6CNCT7vNb4BGUHXC9ZCdSzEMffx1XH2

Individual whale / early buyer

2.79%

B6RPKsKXWfMkXuaQrCFJ8pkPaUDiEYSLPQevnYdoXyzx

Individual whale / early buyer

1.77%

CfVsp5iieBXNKWAUbphtbSfEzYiFCN8bsXV6eoeeYkYN

Individual whale / early buyer

1.65%

Supply concentration is extreme and alarming. The #1 holder at 76.93% is the PumpSwap liquidity pool address (3fMgZDwTjQFZAtorE7zyCvsFhSTf8YG5bqW4zFDMUTTU), which matches the trading pair address listed in the price data. This means the vast majority of token supply is locked in the LP, but with $0.00 reported liquidity value, this LP appears to be effectively empty or worthless. Holders #2 through #10 are individual wallets holding 3.61% down to 0.76%, collectively adding up to ~15.53% of supply. The top 100 holders control 99.54% of supply, leaving only 0.46% distributed among the remaining 131 holders. This is one of the most concentrated distributions observable, consistent with a PumpFun launch where the bonding curve LP holds the majority of tokens.

Liquidity$0.00
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$651,770
Sell$696,100
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers4,788
Unique sellers4,335

The reported total liquidity is $0.00, which is a critical red flag. Despite generating approximately $1.35M in combined 24-hour trading volume (buy: $651.77K, sell: $696.10K), the token has no measurable liquidity depth. This paradox is likely explained by the PumpSwap bonding curve mechanics — volume was generated during the pump phase, but after the price collapse, the LP value has been decimated. With 5,700 unique wallets trading in 24 hours but only 231 current holders, the vast majority of participants have already exited. The net flow is negative (sell volume exceeds buy volume by ~$44K). Slippage risk is extreme — any meaningful sell order would move the price dramatically given the $0 liquidity depth. The market is effectively broken for practical trading purposes.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000 FLUFF
FDV$3,695.22

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a fixed supply of 1,000,000,000 FLUFF with a fully diluted valuation of approximately $3,695 at current prices — an extremely low market cap consistent with a failed or near-dead meme token. The metadata lists the update authority as 'unknown' and the token is marked as 'mutable: false', which is a positive signal suggesting the token metadata cannot be changed. However, mint authority and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the available data, so these cannot be confirmed as renounced. The token was launched via PumpFun (indicated by the 'pump' suffix in the mint address), which typically uses a bonding curve mechanism. The contract is not verified, and while 'possible spam' is flagged as false, the token's behavior (dormant for 30 days, sudden pump-and-dump) is consistent with a coordinated manipulation event. Social links (Telegram, Twitter, Website) exist but their activity level is unknown.

Volatility
high

The token lost -92.8% of its value in 24 hours and -97.5% in 1 hour at its worst point. Three-candle OHLC data shows a pump from $0.0000424 to $0.000170 followed by a crash to $0.00000285 — a range of ~60x within 2 hours. Extreme volatility makes position sizing and risk management nearly impossible.

Liquidity
high

Reported total liquidity is $0.00. Despite $1.35M in 24h volume, there is no measurable exit liquidity. Any holder attempting to sell a meaningful position would face catastrophic slippage or be unable to execute at all.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 92.46% of supply. The #1 holder (PumpSwap LP) holds 76.93%. Holders #2–#5 each hold 1.65%–3.61%. The top 100 control 99.54%. This is an extremely unhealthy distribution that gives a tiny number of wallets total control over price action.

SniperDump
medium

20 snipers were identified, with 14/20 showing positive realized PnL. Most snipers appear to have already sold (high sell-through rate, minimal remaining balances). The primary sniper dump risk has likely already materialized during the 17:00 UTC crash candle. Residual risk from remaining whale holders (#2–#20) persists.

Authority
medium

Mint and freeze authority status are unknown from available data. The token is marked 'mutable: false' which is positive, and the update authority is listed as 'unknown'. The PumpFun launch mechanism typically burns mint authority upon bonding curve completion, but this cannot be confirmed from the provided data.

Key risks

  • Near-zero liquidity ($0.00 reported) makes exit effectively impossible for any meaningful position
  • Extreme supply concentration (top 10 = 92.46%) creates permanent dump overhang
  • Token was dormant for 30+ days before a single pump-and-dump event — suggests coordinated manipulation
  • FDV of only $3,695 — the token is effectively at near-zero value
  • Only 231 holders — insufficient community to sustain any recovery
  • Unverified contract with unknown mint/freeze authority status
  • 1-hour price collapse of -97.5% demonstrates total lack of price stability

Mitigating factors

  • Token metadata is immutable ('mutable: false'), preventing metadata rug
  • Social infrastructure exists (Telegram, Twitter, Website) suggesting some developer presence
  • PumpFun launch mechanism typically provides some baseline tokenomics structure
  • Snipers appear to have largely exited, reducing one source of future sell pressure
  • Buy count (9,208) exceeds sell count (7,709) in 24h, showing some residual buyer interest
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, conservative portfolios, or anyone without deep familiarity with PumpFun meme token mechanics and on-chain risk analysis. The combination of near-zero liquidity, extreme concentration, post-pump price collapse, and minimal holder base makes this one of the highest-risk tokens observable.

fluff (FLUFF) is a PumpFun-launched meme token that has already experienced its primary pump-and-dump cycle. The token launched, pumped ~4x within 2 hours on May 17, 2026, then collapsed -92.8% in 24 hours. With $0 liquidity, 231 holders, and a $3,695 FDV, the token is effectively a failed micro-cap meme coin. Any investment thesis must be purely speculative and based on the possibility of a secondary pump driven by social media virality — not fundamentals.

Bull case (low)

A viral social media moment (Twitter/Telegram) reignites interest in the medieval cat meme narrative, attracting a new wave of buyers. Liquidity is injected by the developer or a whale, enabling price discovery. The token catches a broader Solana meme coin market tailwind and reaches a new local high.

  • Viral social media campaign on Twitter/Telegram
  • Developer-led liquidity injection or marketing push
  • Broader Solana meme season driving speculative capital into micro-caps
  • Low entry price ($0.0000037) creates lottery-ticket appeal for new buyers

Base case

The token stabilizes near its current price of ~$0.0000037 with minimal trading activity. A small community of 200–300 holders remains, with occasional low-volume trades. The token neither recovers meaningfully nor goes completely to zero in the near term, but gradually fades into obscurity over 30–90 days.

  • No new liquidity injection from developer or whales
  • Social channels remain marginally active but fail to drive significant new buyer interest
  • Broader Solana meme market remains neutral, providing no macro tailwind
  • Remaining holders are long-term bag holders unwilling to sell at current prices

Bear case (high)

The token continues to bleed toward zero as the remaining 231 holders gradually exit into the $0 liquidity pool. The developer abandons the project, social channels go silent, and the token becomes completely illiquid and untradeable.

  • $0.00 reported liquidity makes exit impossible and discourages new buyers
  • 30-day dormancy period before the pump suggests no organic development
  • Extreme concentration means any whale exit destroys remaining price
  • FDV of $3,695 is below the threshold of meaningful market interest
  • No verified contract, no confirmed authority renouncements

GeneratedMay 17, 05:18 PM
Data freshnessPrice and OHLC data current as of 2026-05-17T17:00:00.000Z (most recent hourly candle). Holder data current as of analysis time. Historical holder series covers April 17 – May 16, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Solana)
  • PumpSwap DEX price and OHLC data
  • On-chain holder distribution and historical holder series
  • Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
  • Top 20 holder wallet data

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Total sniped USD amounts are 'unknown' for all 20 snipers, limiting precise sniper concentration calculation
  • Sniper current balances are largely 'unknown', preventing exact remaining supply overhang calculation
  • Mint authority and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided — listed as 'unknown'
  • Update authority is listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm renouncement status
  • $0.00 reported liquidity may be a data lag or reporting artifact rather than absolute zero
  • The -1,267 holder change in 1 hour is likely a data anomaly and has been noted but not used as a primary signal
  • No order book depth data available to assess slippage more precisely
  • Token has no verified contract, limiting smart contract risk assessment

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The data presented reflects on-chain conditions at the time of analysis and may change rapidly. Never invest more than you can afford to lose completely. This report is generated from automated on-chain data analysis and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000 FLUFF

Key Risks

Near-zero liquidity ($0.00 reported) makes exit effectively impossible for any meaningful position
Extreme supply concentration (top 10 = 92.46%) creates permanent dump overhang
Token was dormant for 30+ days before a single pump-and-dump event — suggests coordinated manipulation
FDV of only $3,695 — the token is effectively at near-zero value

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

medium confidence
Low risk

20 snipers were identified in the first 1,000 blocks. The majority of snipers are in profit: 14 out of 20 show positive realized PnL percentages, with standout performers at +353.3% (DapzyxB...), +255.1% (2TVj4w...), +234.2% (8c4vNp...), and +70.5% (CodMUW...). Total realized sell proceeds across visible snipers sum to approximately $7,019. Most snipers have fully exited their positions, indicating the smart money has already taken profits. The remaining sniper balances are near zero, suggesting minimal future sell pressure from this cohort specifically. However, the broader whale concentration (top 10 = 92.46%) remains a significant overhang.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.50%
PnL stateMostly In Profit
Sell-through rateHigh
Profit-taking risk
low

Most snipers have sold the majority of their positions (sold amounts range from $3 to $2,944). Only sniper #10 (H21jL1...) retains a $42 balance. Sniper #18 (3KcPSJ...) has $0 balance. The majority have fully exited.

Early buyers (snipers) were predominantly profitable and have largely exited. This confirms the token followed a classic sniper-pump-dump lifecycle. The high sell-through rate among snipers suggests they successfully front-ran retail buyers who entered during the pump phase.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for fluff (fluff)?

The token has already collapsed -92.8% in 24 hours, dropping from an intraday high of ~$0.000170 to ~$0.0000037. The most recent hourly candle (17:00 UTC) shows a massive wick down from $0.000166 open to a close of $0.0000037, confirming a near-total price collapse. With $0.00 reported liquidity, any further sell pressure could push the price to near zero. A brief 5-minute bounce of +13.5% was observed but is likely noise in an illiquid market. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000010 to $0.0000070.

Is fluff a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.4/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, conservative portfolios, or anyone without deep familiarity with PumpFun meme token mechanics and on-chain risk analysis. The combination of near-zero liquidity, extreme concentration, post-pump price collapse, and minimal holder base makes this one of the highest-risk tokens observable.

How are fluff holders trending?

fluff currently has 231 holders and is growing (24h: 23, 7d: 23, 30d: 23). Holder data reveals a deeply concerning pattern. For the entire 30-day historical period (April 17 – May 16), holders were frozen at exactly 177 with zero net change on any day. This suggests the token was dormant or inactive for a full month before the May 17 pump event. The sudden +54 holder increase on May 17 coincides with the pump-and-dump, meaning new holders likely bought at or near the top and are now deeply underwater. The reported -1,267 holder change in 1 hour is anomalous and may reflect a data error. Overall, holder growth is not organic and does not signal healthy community development.

What does sniper activity look like for fluff?

Snipers hold roughly 0.50% of supply with PnL state "mostly_in_profit" and sell-through rate "high". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding fluff?

Near-zero liquidity ($0.00 reported) makes exit effectively impossible for any meaningful position • Extreme supply concentration (top 10 = 92.46%) creates permanent dump overhang • Token was dormant for 30+ days before a single pump-and-dump event — suggests coordinated manipulation

Track fluff