LIMITUS Price Today & AI Analysis

LMTSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 25, 2026

$0.0₄3572

-2.86% 24h

Contract

Live

86t88w3MKT38HChTBKBwEeb1RW1MeTceaW68qY2Vpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

7,844

Market cap

$29,646

At a $1M market cap, $LMT would be $0.001205 (33.7x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is LMT a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 22

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about LMT

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

BANGBangBros$0.0₅2708-1.5%MC $2.7K

MarsCoinMarsCoin$0.0₅6845-1.8%MC $6.7K

HEISENBERGHeisenberg$0.0₅3479-0.2%MC $3.4K

BUNKManhattan Project$0.0₅2903+0.6%MC $2.9K

holyshitholy shit$0.0₅4910-3.0%MC $4.9K

YMBYou Missed Bitches$0.000816+1645.4%MC $813.1K

LIMITUS: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-25 15:17 UTC

Holder addresses

8,211

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$62,262.37

How concentrated is LIMITUS ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 8,211 addresses (2026-07-25 15:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling LIMITUS?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is LIMITUS liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-25 15:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $62,262.37. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-25 15:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 25, 03:17 PM UTC

FDV

$272,482

Liquidity

$62,262.37

Holders

8,211

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

LIMITUS (LMT) is a Solana-based token (mint: 86t88w3MKT38HChTBKBwEeb1RW1MeTceaW68qY2Vpump) with a stated AI/Web3 platform narrative. The token has experienced an extraordinary 1,081% price surge in 24 hours, rising from ~$0.000028 to ~$0.000328. However, this spike is accompanied by severe red flags: 86.4% sell pressure, extremely shallow liquidity ($62.26K total), highly concentrated supply (top 10 hold 59.74%), and a holder base that was essentially flat for the prior 30 days before a sudden +1,163 holder spike in 24 hours. The token trades on Raydium and has a fully diluted valuation of only $272.48K.

Key points

Extreme 24h price surge of +1,081% with very low absolute price ($0.000328)
Holder count jumped +1,163 (+14%) in 24 hours after 30 days of near-zero growth
Top single holder controls 36.24% of supply (~300.8M tokens)
Total liquidity of only $62.26K creates extreme slippage risk
86.4% sell pressure vs 13.6% buy pressure in 24h trading

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–72 hours

bearish

The token has surged ~1,082% in 24 hours on extremely thin liquidity ($62.26K) with 86.4% sell pressure. The OHLC data shows candle [1] has an anomalous L < O (L: $0.000242 > O: $0.0000406 — data appears inverted/erratic), and volume collapsed from $10,142 in hour 14 to $163 in hour 15, signaling exhaustion. A sharp mean-reversion or dump is the most probable short-term outcome.

Target low

$0.000028

Target high

$0.000450

Support: $0.000037 (recent OHLC low base), $0.000028 (pre-pump level)
Resistance: $0.000242 (candle [1] high), $0.000450 (extension target if momentum resumes)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

Without sustained buy-side volume, meaningful liquidity depth, and a reduction in top-holder concentration, the token is unlikely to sustain elevated prices. The 30-day holder stagnation prior to the pump suggests organic demand was absent. Medium-term outlook is bearish unless a genuine catalyst (exchange listing, product launch) emerges.

Catalysts

Exchange listing or major partnership announcement
Reduction in top-holder concentration through distribution
Significant liquidity injection into the Raydium pool
Broader Solana memecoin/AI narrative rally

Bullish factors

Massive 24h price momentum (+1,081%) could attract momentum traders
Holder count growing rapidly (+1,163 in 24h) suggests new interest
AI/Web3 narrative is currently popular in crypto markets
Token is verified and not flagged as spam

Bearish factors

86.4% sell pressure in 24h ($9.46K sells vs $1.49K buys)
Extremely shallow liquidity ($62.26K total) — large orders will cause severe slippage
Top holder controls 36.24% of supply — single-entity dump risk is critical
Top 10 holders control 59.74% — highly concentrated
30 days of near-zero holder growth before the pump suggests manufactured activity
FDV of only $272.48K limits institutional interest
Update authority not renounced (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM)

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 4 hourly OHLC candles available, (2) apparent data anomalies in candle L/H fields, (3) extreme volatility making price targets unreliable, and (4) no sniper data available to assess early-buyer behavior.

LMT call history

Full track record →

Jul 25bearish@ $0.000328

24h-80.4%

7d-86.0%

30d-87.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 86t88w...pump
Total Supply: 830,114,747.54 LMT

Key Risks

Single largest non-LP holder could dump 4.49%+ of supply at any time
86.4% sell pressure indicates active distribution into the pump
Liquidity of $62.26K is insufficient to support the current $272K FDV without severe slippage
30 days of flat holder growth followed by sudden +14% spike is a classic pump-and-dump pattern

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 4 hourly candles are available (12:00–15:00 UTC on 2026-07-25). Candle [4] (12:00): O=$0.0000371, H=$0.0000388, L=$0.0000371, C=$0.0000388 — small bullish candle, tight range, very low volume ($14). Candle [3] (13:00): O=$0.0000406, H=$0.0000406, L=$0.0000406, C=$0.0000371 — doji/bearish candle, flat open/high, close below open, low volume ($631). Candle [2] (14:00): O=$0.0000371, H=$0.0000406, L=$0.0000842, C=$0.0000406 — NOTE: L > H which is anomalous data; volume spiked to $10,142 suggesting the major price action occurred here. Candle [1] (15:00): O=$0.0000406, H=$0.0000406, L=$0.000242, C=$0.0000371 — again L > H anomaly; volume collapsed to $163. The OHLC data appears to have L and H fields swapped in candles [1] and [2], making pattern analysis unreliable. The current price ($0.000328) is far above all candle values, suggesting the major pump occurred outside this 4-candle window or the data is incomplete/delayed.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically upward given the 1,081% 24h price surge, but the move appears parabolic and unsustainable given sell pressure dominance. Medium-term trend was sideways/declining for 30 days prior to this event.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

14%

Sell

86%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000037 (recent OHLC candle base)

Major support

$0.000028 (pre-pump price level)

Immediate resistance

$0.000450 (psychological extension level)

Major resistance

$0.000242 (anomalous candle spike high)

Support levels are derived from the OHLC candle lows around $0.000037. The pre-pump price (~$0.000028, inferred from 24h $ change of $0.000300 subtracted from current $0.000328) represents major support. Resistance is thin given the shallow liquidity.

Notable patterns

Parabolic price spike (+1,081% in 24h) — classic pump pattern
Volume exhaustion: 98.4% volume drop from peak candle to latest candle
Anomalous OHLC data (L > H in candles [1] and [2]) — data quality concern
Sell pressure dominance (86.4%) during price spike — distribution signal
Holder count spike coinciding with price pump — possible coordinated activity

Liquidity

$62,262.37

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $62,260 total on the Raydium pair (38256B3SrJ8NTd4q9HgJjowGmSVw357f457Wqf5HS8h7). With an FDV of $272,480, the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 22.8%, which is low. Any sell order above a few hundred dollars will cause significant price impact. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $9,460 in sells vs $1,490 in buys (86.4% sell pressure), representing a net outflow of ~$7,970. Despite equal numbers of unique buyers and sellers (28 each), sell volume is 6.3x buy volume, indicating sellers are transacting in larger sizes. Only 42 unique wallets traded in 24h, confirming thin market participation. The combination of shallow liquidity, dominant sell pressure, and low unique wallet count makes this market highly susceptible to manipulation and rapid price collapse.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

830,114,747.54 LMT

FDV

$272,482.47

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Token has surged 1,081% in 24 hours from a very low base price. Such extreme volatility is characteristic of pump-and-dump schemes or highly speculative micro-cap tokens. Price could retrace 80-95% rapidly.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $62,260. Any sell order of meaningful size will cause severe slippage. Exiting a position of even $1,000 could move the price by 1-2% or more. This is a critical risk for anyone holding a significant position.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Single largest non-LP holder could dump 4.49%+ of supply at any time
86.4% sell pressure indicates active distribution into the pump
Liquidity of $62.26K is insufficient to support the current $272K FDV without severe slippage
30 days of flat holder growth followed by sudden +14% spike is a classic pump-and-dump pattern
Update authority not renounced — metadata could theoretically be altered
Mint/freeze authority status unconfirmed
Token launched via pump.fun infrastructure — associated with high-risk speculative launches
No sniper data available — early buyer behavior unknown

Mitigating factors

Token metadata is set to 'Mutable: false', limiting metadata manipulation
Contract is verified and not flagged as spam
Largest holder (36.24%) appears to be the Raydium liquidity pool, not a dumping wallet
Token has social links (Reddit, Twitter, website) suggesting some project presence
8,211 total holders provides some distribution breadth

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand pump-and-dump dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of executing rapid exits on thin liquidity. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than a trivial speculative amount.

LIMITUS (LMT) presents as a high-risk speculative micro-cap token that has experienced a parabolic pump of 1,081% in 24 hours. The fundamental data does not support the price action: liquidity is critically shallow ($62.26K), sell pressure dominates (86.4%), supply is highly concentrated, and holder growth was flat for 30 days before the pump. The AI/Web3 narrative may attract speculative interest, but there is no on-chain evidence of genuine adoption or utility driving this price move.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Momentum continuation: The AI/Web3 narrative attracts broader attention, new liquidity enters the Raydium pool, and the token achieves a viral social media moment that sustains buying pressure. Holder count continues to grow organically, and the project delivers a tangible product milestone.

Viral social media traction for the AI/Web3 narrative
Significant new liquidity injection into the trading pair
Exchange listing announcement
Broader Solana ecosystem bull run

Base Case

Partial retracement and consolidation: The token retraces 50-70% from peak levels as early buyers take profits, then consolidates at a higher level than pre-pump if some new holders remain. Price stabilizes in the $0.000080–$0.000150 range pending any genuine project developments.

Some portion of new holders are genuine believers who hold through the retracement
Liquidity pool remains intact and is not withdrawn
No major whale dumps in the near term
Project team provides updates that maintain community interest

Bear Case

High probability

Pump-and-dump collapse: Large holders distribute into the pump, liquidity is withdrawn, and the price retraces 80-95% to pre-pump levels (~$0.000028 or lower). The sudden holder spike proves to be FOMO buyers who become exit liquidity.

86.4% sell pressure already dominant during the pump
Top holders with round-number balances begin distributing
Liquidity too shallow to absorb selling pressure
30-day flat holder history suggests no organic demand base
No confirmed product or utility driving the price action

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 25, 03:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-25 15:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (mint: 86t88w3MKT38HChTBKBwEeb1RW1MeTceaW68qY2Vpump)
Raydium DEX trading pair data (pair: 38256B3SrJ8NTd4q9HgJjowGmSVw357f457Wqf5HS8h7)
OHLC hourly candle data (4 candles, 2026-07-25 12:00–15:00 UTC)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and distribution data (8,211 total holders)
Top 20 holder addresses and balances
30-day historical daily holder count series
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 4 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
OHLC candle data appears to have L and H fields anomalously swapped in candles [1] and [2]
No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and concentration cannot be assessed
Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly confirmed in provided data
Holder classification (whale/shark/dolphin etc.) uses platform-defined thresholds not disclosed
Top holder address classification (LP pool vs. treasury) is inferred, not confirmed
Current price ($0.000328) is significantly above all OHLC candle values, suggesting data gap or delay
No order book depth data available to precisely quantify slippage
Project fundamentals (actual product, team, roadmap) cannot be verified from on-chain data alone

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in LMT. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is LIMITUS (LMT) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 22, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell LIMITUS (LMT)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 22, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is LIMITUS ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 8,211 addresses (2026-07-25 15:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling LIMITUS?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is LIMITUS liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-25 15:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $62,262.37. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for LIMITUS (LMT)?

Is LMT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand pump-and-dump dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of executing rapid exits on thin liquidity. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than a trivial speculative amount.

What are the key risks of holding LMT?

Single largest non-LP holder could dump 4.49%+ of supply at any time • 86.4% sell pressure indicates active distribution into the pump • Liquidity of $62.26K is insufficient to support the current $272K FDV without severe slippage