Rizzmas Price Today & AI Analysis

Q: Can I sell Rizzmas?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

Q: Is Rizzmas a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can afford to lose their entire investment. It is NOT suitable for conservative investors, income-seeking investors, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token risks. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

RizzmasSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 16, 2026

$0.0₅1295

+4.65% 24h

Contract

Live

85cQsFgbi8mBZxiPppbpPXuV7j1hA8tBwhjF4gKW6mHg

Chain

Solana

Holders

129,821

Market cap

$643,005

At a $10M market cap, $RIZZMAS would be $0.0₄2015 (15.6x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is Rizzmas a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 28

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about Rizzmas

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

UAPUAP$0.0₄1314-2.0%MC $13.1K

TTPTrendTrader Pro$0.000160-5.7%MC $156.5K HhaMSTRhaMSTR$0.0₄4865-20.4%MC $48.6K

vampvamp$0.0₄4149-0.7%MC $39.9K

SUPERCORESUPERCORE$0.0₄2415+0.6%MC $23.3K

ZECZcash$1,257.52-3.2%MC $129.17M

Rizzmas: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-16 19:47 UTC

Holder addresses

131,965

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$121,517.48

How concentrated is Rizzmas ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 131,965 addresses (2026-06-16 19:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Rizzmas?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Rizzmas liquidity falling?: As of 2026-06-16 19:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $121,517.48. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-16 19:47 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 16, 07:47 PM UTC

FDV

$195,952

Liquidity

$121,517.48

Holders

131,965

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Rizzmas (RIZZMAS) is a Solana-based meme token with a holiday/internet-slang theme, trading at approximately $0.000000395 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$195K. The token has experienced a severe 24-hour price crash of ~64-67%, driven by overwhelming sell pressure (80.7% of 24h volume). With 131,965 holders, the token has a broad holder base but is in a persistent declining trend. The top 2 wallets alone control ~41.7% of supply, representing extreme concentration risk. Mint authority has NOT been renounced (mutable metadata, non-burn update authority), adding rug risk.

Key points

Meme token with holiday/internet-culture branding (Rizzmas)
Large holder base of ~132K wallets suggesting prior viral distribution
Extreme top-2 wallet concentration (~41.7% combined)
Severe 24h price crash of ~64-67% with 80.7% sell pressure
Metadata is mutable with a non-renounced update authority — elevated rug risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-72 hours

bearish

The token has crashed ~64-67% in 24 hours with sell pressure at 80.7%. The most recent candle (candle [2]) shows a catastrophic wick from ~$1.11e-6 down to ~$2.22e-7 before closing at ~$4.07e-7, indicating a massive dump event. Current price ~$3.95e-7 is near the recent low. With holders declining and sell pressure dominating, further downside is likely in the short term unless a reversal catalyst emerges.

Target low

$2.2e-7

Target high

$5.5e-7

Support: $3.86e-7 (candle [1] low), $2.22e-7 (candle [2] wick low — major crash low)
Resistance: $5.5e-7 (mid-range between crash low and pre-crash level), $1.03e-6 (pre-crash consolidation zone, candles [3]-[22])

Medium term · 7-30 days

bearish

Holder count has been declining for 30 consecutive days (from 133,156 to 131,965, a loss of ~1,191 holders or ~0.9%). The rate of decline has been accelerating in recent days (85 lost on June 15 vs. ~17-18/day in mid-May). Combined with the severe price crash, mutable metadata, and concentrated supply, the medium-term outlook is bearish unless significant new catalysts or community activity emerge.

Catalysts

Viral social media campaign reviving meme interest
Broader Solana meme coin market rally
Large wallet distribution reducing concentration
New exchange listing or partnership announcement

Bullish factors

Large existing holder base of ~132K wallets provides potential for community revival
5m and 1h price changes are slightly positive (+0.56%, +2.19%), suggesting very short-term stabilization
Total liquidity of $121.52K provides some depth relative to FDV of $195K
Active social presence (Twitter, Telegram, Discord, website)

Bearish factors

Severe 24h price crash of ~64-67%
80.7% sell pressure in 24h ($64.89K sell vs $15.48K buy volume)
Holder count declining for 30 consecutive days, accelerating recently
Top 2 wallets hold ~41.7% of supply — extreme dump risk
Metadata is mutable with non-renounced update authority
Pre-crash price (~$1.03-1.14e-6) was ~2.6x current price — significant value destruction

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the highly speculative nature of meme tokens, the absence of sniper data, the extreme volatility shown in the OHLC data (a single candle showing a ~78% intra-hour swing), and the mutable/non-renounced contract status which introduces unpredictable rug risk.

Rizzmas call history

Full track record →

Jun 16bearish@ $3.95e-7

24h+31.3%

7d+2.1%

30d-10.7%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 85cQsF...6mHg
Total Supply: 496,416,734,310 RIZZMAS

Key Risks

Extreme supply concentration: top wallet holds 24.98%, top 2 hold ~41.7% — single-wallet dump could be catastrophic
Mutable metadata with non-renounced update authority — rug risk vector remains open
Persistent 30-day holder decline accelerating — retail interest fading
80.7% sell pressure in 24h with a 4.2:1 sell-to-buy volume ratio

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 22-hour OHLC series reveals two distinct phases. Candles [22] through [3] (June 15 20:00 to June 16 16:00) show a tight consolidation band between approximately $1.02e-6 and $1.14e-6 with very low volume (mostly under 300 USD/hour), indicating a period of low-activity price stability. Candle [2] (June 16 18:00) is the pivotal event: it opened at ~$1.108e-6, reached a high of ~$1.110e-6, then crashed to a low of ~$2.22e-7 before closing at ~$4.07e-7 — a massive bearish engulfing/crash candle with a volume spike of $83,561 (by far the largest in the series). Candle [1] (June 16 19:00) shows a narrow range ($3.86e-7 to $4.04e-7) with very low volume ($284), suggesting post-crash stabilization with minimal buying interest.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Both short-term and medium-term trends are clearly bearish following the catastrophic dump in candle [2]. The pre-crash consolidation was sideways, but the violent breakdown has established a new, much lower price range. No recovery structure has formed yet.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

19%

Sell

81%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$3.86e-7 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$2.22e-7 (candle [2] wick low — the crash floor)

Immediate resistance

$4.07e-7 (candle [2] close / recent high)

Major resistance

$1.03e-6 (pre-crash consolidation base, candles [16]-[22])

The token has broken decisively below its multi-hour consolidation range of ~$1.02-1.14e-6. The crash low of ~$2.22e-7 represents the major support floor. Immediate resistance is the post-crash close at ~$4.07e-7. A recovery back to the pre-crash zone (~$1.03e-6) would require a ~2.6x move from current levels, which appears unlikely without a major catalyst.

Notable patterns

Massive bearish crash candle [2]: opened at $1.108e-6, crashed to $2.22e-7 low, closed at $4.07e-7 — a ~78% intra-hour range
Post-crash doji/narrow range in candle [1]: very tight range ($3.86e-7 to $4.04e-7) with minimal volume — indecision/exhaustion
Pre-crash sideways consolidation (candles [3]-[22]): 19 consecutive hours of near-flat price action with negligible volume, suggesting accumulation or distribution before the dump
Volume climax on crash candle: $83,561 vs. typical <$1,000/hour — classic capitulation or coordinated dump signature

Liquidity

$121,517.48

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of $121.52K against an FDV of $195.15K gives a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~62%, which appears reasonable on the surface but is misleading given the shallow depth. The 24h net flow is heavily negative: $64.89K in sells vs $15.48K in buys — a 4.2:1 sell-to-buy ratio. With only 114 unique buyers vs 125 unique sellers and 578 buys vs 611 sells, the market is clearly in distribution mode. The single Raydium pair (HGRvEZF83Hm2x5HoVx9ec2cBiAjTmWFHK6VCUPLH4yDY) means all liquidity is concentrated in one pool, amplifying slippage risk. Any large sell order from the top wallet (24.98% of supply) would be catastrophic for the pool. Slippage risk is assessed as high.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

496,416,734,310 RIZZMAS

FDV

$195,952

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
The token crashed ~64-67% in a single 24-hour period, with a single candle showing a ~78% intra-hour range. Extreme volatility is inherent to this asset class and this token specifically.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of $121.52K in a single Raydium pool. High slippage risk for any meaningful position size. A large sell from the top wallet (24.98% of supply) would drain the pool.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme supply concentration: top wallet holds 24.98%, top 2 hold ~41.7% — single-wallet dump could be catastrophic
Mutable metadata with non-renounced update authority — rug risk vector remains open
Persistent 30-day holder decline accelerating — retail interest fading
80.7% sell pressure in 24h with a 4.2:1 sell-to-buy volume ratio
Single liquidity pool on Raydium — no diversified liquidity
Meme token with no fundamental utility — value entirely speculative and sentiment-driven
Severe 24h price crash of ~64-67% already occurred — further downside possible

Mitigating factors

Large existing holder base of ~132K wallets provides community foundation
Active social media presence (Twitter, Telegram, Discord, website)
Verified contract flag (though this does not guarantee safety)
Total liquidity ($121.52K) is substantial relative to FDV ($195K)
Very short-term price stabilization signals (5m: +0.56%, 1h: +2.19%)

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can afford to lose their entire investment. It is NOT suitable for conservative investors, income-seeking investors, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token risks. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

Rizzmas is a high-risk Solana meme token that has experienced a catastrophic 24h price crash of ~64-67%, driven by overwhelming sell pressure from concentrated holders. The token has a large but declining holder base, mutable metadata with non-renounced authority, and extreme supply concentration in the top wallets. The investment case is almost entirely speculative, dependent on meme virality and community revival.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Community revival and meme virality drive renewed retail interest, causing a short-squeeze-like recovery toward pre-crash levels (~$1.03e-6), representing a ~2.6x gain from current levels.

Viral social media campaign on Twitter/Telegram reviving Rizzmas meme
Broader Solana meme coin market bull run lifting all meme tokens
Large wallet (top 2) ceasing distribution and beginning accumulation
New exchange listing or influencer promotion

Base Case

Price stabilizes in the $3.0e-7 to $5.0e-7 range with low volume and continued slow holder attrition, as the token enters a prolonged low-activity phase typical of post-peak meme tokens.

Top wallets do not aggressively dump remaining holdings
Liquidity pool remains intact
No major positive or negative catalysts emerge
Holder decline continues at ~40-60/day pace

Bear Case

High probability

Continued distribution from top wallets, accelerating holder decline, and loss of community interest drive the price toward the crash low of ~$2.22e-7 or lower, representing a further ~44% decline from current levels.

Top wallet (24.98%) begins selling its position
Holder decline accelerates post-crash as retail loses confidence
Mutable metadata exploited for rug pull
Broader meme coin market downturn
Liquidity pool drained by large sells

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 16, 07:47 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-16 19:47 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (Mint: 85cQsFgbi8mBZxiPppbpPXuV7j1hA8tBwhjF4gKW6mHg)
Raydium DEX pair data (HGRvEZF83Hm2x5HoVx9ec2cBiAjTmWFHK6VCUPLH4yDY)
22-hour OHLC candle data (hourly, USD)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
Top 20 holder distribution data
30-day daily historical holder metrics
Token price feed (USD and WSOL-denominated)

Limitations

No sniper data available — smart money/early buyer analysis is incomplete
Freeze authority status not explicitly provided in metadata
Top holder wallet classifications are inferred, not confirmed (no on-chain contract verification for each address)
Only 22 hours of OHLC data available — longer-term technical analysis is limited
Meme token valuation is inherently speculative and not amenable to fundamental analysis
Update authority wallet (72x3Eo99X44zweqUZNFJh9NzXPL462dxK1WbiE8ZJ8CS) not further investigated for identity

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Meme tokens carry extreme risk of total loss. Past price action does not predict future performance. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. The analyst has no position in this token.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Rizzmas a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Rizzmas?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Rizzmas ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 131,965 addresses (2026-06-16 19:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Rizzmas?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Rizzmas liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-16 19:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $121,517.48. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Rizzmas (Rizzmas)?

Is Rizzmas a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can afford to lose their entire investment. It is NOT suitable for conservative investors, income-seeking investors, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token risks. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

What are the key risks of holding Rizzmas?

Extreme supply concentration: top wallet holds 24.98%, top 2 hold ~41.7% — single-wallet dump could be catastrophic • Mutable metadata with non-renounced update authority — rug risk vector remains open • Persistent 30-day holder decline accelerating — retail interest fading