EYEZ Price Today & AI Analysis

EYEZSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 17, 2026

$0.0₅4303

Contract

Live

7u1KL6tSGHCmvjq1Cgo4XUnHhEnUPPVRXUd4b2p9pump

Chain

Solana

Holders

124

Market cap

$4,302

At a $1M market cap, $EYEZ would be $0.001000 (232x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is EYEZ a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 28

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about EYEZ

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

WinstonWinston$0.0₅3066+0.0%MC $3.1K

GunnerSofthearted Gunner$0.0₅3037+0.0%MC $2.9K

₽Pokémon Dollar$0.0₅2264+0.0%MC $2.2K

XDAOXDAO$0.0₅1907+0.0%MC $1.9K

FraudeFraude$0.0₅2143+0.0%MC $2.1K

ZECZcash$1,276.76+3.7%MC $130.88M

EYEZ: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-17 22:17 UTC

Holder addresses

1,032

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$43,238.47

How concentrated is EYEZ ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,032 addresses (2026-06-17 22:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling EYEZ?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is EYEZ liquidity falling?: As of 2026-06-17 22:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $43,238.47. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-17 22:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 17, 10:17 PM UTC

FDV

$170,076

Liquidity

$43,238.47

Holders

1,032

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

EYEZ (EYEZ) is an ultra-early-stage Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap with a mint address ending in 'pump', indicating a pump.fun origin. The token has a fully diluted valuation of ~$164–170K and total liquidity of only $43.24K. It experienced a dramatic 139% price surge in the last 24 hours, but the data reveals several significant anomalies: the holder count jumped from 6 to 1,032 in a single day (99% growth in 1h/24h/7d/30d all identical), top holder concentration data is zeroed out, and the OHLC candles show extreme intra-hour volatility with a near-total price collapse in candle [1]. These anomalies suggest either a data indexing lag, a very recent launch event, or potential manipulation. The token is unverified, has unknown update authority, and carries very high risk.

Key points

Extreme 139% 24h price surge on very thin $43.24K liquidity
Holder count exploded from 6 to 1,032 in a single snapshot — all growth attributed to the last hour
OHLC candle [1] shows a catastrophic close at $0.0000167 from an open of $0.000140 — a ~88% intra-hour crash
No top holder data available and supply concentration reported as 0% — data anomaly
No sniper data available
Pump.fun origin with unverified contract and unknown update authority

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The OHLC data reveals extreme intra-hour volatility. Candle [1] (most recent) opened at $0.000140, spiked to $0.000177, then crashed to close at $0.0000167 — an ~88% intra-hour collapse. Candle [2] then recovered from $0.0000167 to close at $0.000130. The current price of $0.000170 sits near the candle [1] high. With only $43.24K in liquidity and 51.2% sell pressure dominating, the short-term outlook is bearish. A retest of the $0.0000167 low is plausible.

Target low

$0.0000167

Target high

$0.000177

Support: $0.0000167 (candle [1] and [2] low), $0.000100 (candle [1] intra-hour low)
Resistance: $0.000140 (candle [1] open / candle [2] high), $0.000177 (candle [1] all-time high in window)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

The token spent 30 days with only 6 holders before a sudden explosion to 1,032. This pattern is consistent with a very recent launch or coordinated activity. Without sustained organic holder growth, meaningful utility, or deeper liquidity, medium-term price appreciation is unlikely. The thin liquidity pool means any significant sell pressure will cause outsized price drops.

Catalysts

Sustained organic holder growth beyond the initial 1,032
Liquidity pool deepening above $100K
Verified contract and renounced authorities
Broader Solana meme coin market rally

Bullish factors

139% 24h price surge demonstrates speculative demand
3,430 buy transactions vs 3,051 sells — more buy events
1,546 unique buyers vs 990 unique sellers in 24h
Rapid holder growth from 6 to 1,032 could signal viral momentum

Bearish factors

Extremely thin liquidity at $43.24K — high slippage risk
51.2% sell volume pressure exceeds buy volume
OHLC candle [1] shows ~88% intra-hour price collapse
Holder data anomalies suggest possible data manipulation or wash trading
No top holder transparency — concentration data zeroed out
Unverified contract, unknown update authority
30 days of near-zero activity (6 holders) before sudden spike

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to multiple data anomalies: zeroed-out concentration metrics, identical holder growth across all timeframes (1h/24h/7d/30d all showing +1,026), missing top holder data, missing sniper data, and only 2 OHLC candles available. The price change fields for 5m/1h/6h/24h show contradictory values (5m: +41% but 1h/6h/24h: 0%). These inconsistencies make reliable price modeling impossible.

EYEZ call history

Full track record →

Jun 17bearish@ $0.000170

24h-96.4%

7d-97.5%

30d-97.7%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 7u1KL6...pump
Total Supply: 999,999,977.25

Key Risks

Extreme liquidity thinness ($43.24K) — high slippage and price manipulation risk
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority — potential rug pull vectors
Holder data anomalies (0% concentration, no top holder list) — lack of transparency
OHLC data shows ~88% intra-hour price collapse — evidence of pump-and-dump dynamics

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available. Candle [2] (21:00 UTC): O=$0.0000167, H=$0.000140, L=$0.0000167, C=$0.000130, V=334,148 — a strong bullish candle with a massive lower wick, suggesting a capitulation low followed by aggressive buying. Candle [1] (22:00 UTC): O=$0.000140, H=$0.000177, L=$0.000100, C=$0.0000167, V=262,748 — this candle is deeply bearish: it opened at the prior close, made a new high of $0.000177, then collapsed ~88% to close at $0.0000167. This is a classic 'shooting star' or 'bearish engulfing' pattern at the top of a rapid move, signaling a potential exhaustion/dump. The current price of $0.000170 is significantly above the candle [1] close, suggesting either a data lag in the candle feed or a rapid recovery after the close.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Downtrend

With only 2 candles available, trend analysis is severely limited. The two candles show a violent pump-and-dump pattern within a 2-hour window. The medium-term context (30 days of 6 holders) suggests no established uptrend. The current price near the candle [1] high while the candle closed near its low creates a contradictory signal — likely reflecting data feed timing issues.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

49%

Sell

51%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000100 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.0000167 (candle [1] and [2] absolute low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000140 (candle [1] open / candle [2] high)

Major resistance

$0.000177 (candle [1] all-time high in available data)

The $0.0000167 level has been tested twice (as candle [2] open/low and candle [1] close) making it a critical support. A break below this level would suggest complete capitulation. The $0.000177 level represents the only observable all-time high and acts as major resistance. The current price of $0.000170 is dangerously close to this resistance with very thin liquidity to support it.

Notable patterns

Shooting star / bearish engulfing in candle [1] — price made new high then collapsed ~88% intra-hour
Double bottom at $0.0000167 (candle [2] low = candle [1] close)
Extreme wick-to-body ratio in both candles indicating high manipulation risk
Volume declining from candle [2] to candle [1] during price spike — bearish divergence

Liquidity

$43,238.47

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

The liquidity pool on PumpSwap (pair EAmmNeE9Q3PjDDtgfqpaouxnyoSnuU8GLAY8C7TA5U9y) holds only $43.24K in total liquidity against a 24h trading volume of ~$600K — a volume-to-liquidity ratio of approximately 14:1. This is extremely thin and means even modest trades will cause significant price impact. The FDV of ~$164-170K is nearly 4x the liquidity, further highlighting the fragility of the market. Net flow is slightly negative (sell volume $307.12K > buy volume $293K), indicating marginal outflow pressure. While unique buyers (1,546) outnumber unique sellers (990), the higher average sell size suggests larger holders are distributing into retail buy pressure. Slippage risk is high for any position above a few hundred dollars.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,977.25

FDV

$164,190–$170,076

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
The token experienced an ~88% intra-hour price collapse in candle [1] and a 139% 24h gain. The 5m price change of +41% while 1h/6h/24h show 0% indicates extreme short-term volatility. This level of volatility is consistent with pump-and-dump dynamics.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $43.24K against ~$600K in 24h volume. The volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~14:1 means the pool is being churned at an unsustainable rate. Any significant sell order will cause severe price impact and slippage.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme liquidity thinness ($43.24K) — high slippage and price manipulation risk
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority — potential rug pull vectors
Holder data anomalies (0% concentration, no top holder list) — lack of transparency
OHLC data shows ~88% intra-hour price collapse — evidence of pump-and-dump dynamics
30 days of dormancy followed by sudden activity — suspicious launch pattern
Unverified contract on pump.fun platform
51.2% sell volume pressure with larger average sell sizes
No sniper data — early holder behavior completely opaque

Mitigating factors

Token metadata marked as 'mutable: false' — reduces post-launch metadata manipulation risk
More unique buyers (1,546) than sellers (990) in 24h — some genuine retail interest
More buy transactions (3,430) than sell transactions (3,051) — active trading community
'Possible spam: false' flag from data provider
Social links present (telegram, twitter, website) — some community infrastructure

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced degenerate traders who fully understand pump.fun mechanics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions in real-time. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme coin risks. Position sizes should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket only).

EYEZ is a high-risk, ultra-speculative pump.fun meme token with a ~$164K FDV and only $43.24K in liquidity. The token exhibits multiple red flags including data anomalies, unknown authorities, extreme intra-hour volatility, and a suspicious 30-day dormancy period before sudden activity. The only bullish case rests on continued speculative momentum in the Solana meme coin ecosystem. The bear case — which is the most probable — involves a rapid price collapse as early holders distribute into retail demand.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral meme momentum drives sustained holder growth and liquidity deepening. The 'EYEZ' brand gains traction on social media, attracting a community that pushes the FDV toward $1M+ (a ~6x from current levels). Authorities are confirmed renounced, contract is verified, and the token graduates from pump.fun dynamics into a legitimate meme coin.

Viral social media traction on Twitter/Telegram
Sustained organic holder growth beyond 1,032
Liquidity pool deepening to $200K+
Confirmed renounced authorities reducing rug risk
Broader Solana meme coin market rally

Base Case

EYEZ experiences continued high volatility with multiple pump-and-dump cycles typical of pump.fun tokens. The price oscillates between $0.0000167 and $0.000177 for a short period before gradually declining as early holders exit. The token stabilizes at a fraction of its current price with a small but persistent community.

Trading activity continues at reduced volume over the next 1-7 days
No major liquidity removal event in the short term
Holder count grows modestly to 2,000-5,000 but concentration remains high
Price settles in the $0.00003–$0.00008 range within 2 weeks

Bear Case

High probability

Early holders and/or the deployer dump their positions into the current retail buying frenzy. The thin $43.24K liquidity pool is unable to absorb sell pressure, causing a rapid price collapse of 80-95% from current levels. The token becomes dormant again or is abandoned.

Unknown large holder concentration dumping into retail
Liquidity pool drain or removal by deployer
Sell volume already exceeding buy volume ($307K vs $293K)
OHLC candle [1] already showed an ~88% intra-hour collapse — pattern may repeat
No fundamental value or utility to sustain price

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 17, 10:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-17 22:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Moralis token metadata API
PumpSwap on-chain pair data (EAmmNeE9Q3PjDDtgfqpaouxnyoSnuU8GLAY8C7TA5U9y)
Hourly OHLC candle feed (2 candles)
24h trading analytics aggregator
Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
Holder distribution and concentration metrics
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 2 OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
Top 20 holder list returned empty — whale map analysis severely limited
Supply concentration metrics (top10, top100) reported as 0% — likely a data indexing anomaly
Sniper analysis endpoint returned no data — smart money signals cannot be assessed
Holder growth metrics show identical values across 1h/24h/7d/30d — suggests data anomaly or indexing lag
Update authority listed as 'unknown' — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
Price change fields for 1h/6h/24h show 0% despite 139% 24h change being reported elsewhere — contradictory data
Token is very newly active — most metrics lack historical baseline for comparison
No verified contract — on-chain code cannot be audited

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. All data is sourced from third-party APIs and may contain errors, lags, or anomalies as noted. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. Never invest more than you can afford to lose completely. Always conduct your own due diligence and verify on-chain data independently before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is EYEZ a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell EYEZ?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is EYEZ ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,032 addresses (2026-06-17 22:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling EYEZ?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is EYEZ liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-17 22:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $43,238.47. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for EYEZ (EYEZ)?

Is EYEZ a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced degenerate traders who fully understand pump.fun mechanics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions in real-time. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme coin risks. Position sizes should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket only).

What are the key risks of holding EYEZ?

Extreme liquidity thinness ($43.24K) — high slippage and price manipulation risk • Unknown mint/freeze/update authority — potential rug pull vectors • Holder data anomalies (0% concentration, no top holder list) — lack of transparency